Pre-hospital causes for delayed arrival in acute ischemic stroke before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study at two stroke centers in Egypt

Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted care for non-COVID patients. Performance indicators to monitor acute care, timely reported and internationally accepted, lacked during the pandemic in OECD countries. This study aims to summarize the performance indicators available in the literature to monitor changes in the quality of acute care in OECD countries during the first year and a half of the pandemic (2020-July 2021) and to assess their trends.

METHODS

Scoping review. Search in Embase and MEDLINE (07-07-2022). Acute care performance indicators and indicators related to acute general surgery were collected and collated following a care pathway approach. Indicators assessing identical clinical measures were grouped under a common indicator title. The trends from each group of indicators were collated (increase/decrease/stable).

RESULTS

A total of 152 studies were included. 2354 indicators regarding general acute care and 301 indicators related to acute general surgery were included. Indicators focusing on pre-hospital services reported a decreasing trend in the volume of patients: from 225 indicators, 110 (49%) reported a decrease. An increasing trend in pre-hospital treatment times was reported by most of the indicators (n = 41;70%) and a decreasing trend in survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 61;75%). Concerning care provided in the emergency department, most of the indicators (n = 752;71%) showed a decreasing trend in admissions across all levels of urgency. Concerning the mortality rate after admission, most of the indicators (n = 23;53%) reported an increasing trend. The subset of indicators assessing acute general surgery showed a decreasing trend in the volume of patients (n = 50;49%), stability in clinical severity at admission (n = 36;53%), and in the volume of surgeries (n = 14;47%). Most of the indicators (n = 28;65%) reported no change in treatment approach and stable mortality rate (n = 11,69%).

CONCLUSION

This review signals relevant disruptions across the acute care pathway. A subset of general surgery performance indicators showed stability in most of the phases of the care pathway. These results highlight the relevance of assessing this care pathway more regularly and systematically across different clinical entities to monitor disruptions and to improve the resilience of emergency services during a crisis.

Deciphering the contextual barriers to mainstreaming the implementation of stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital: Findings from the activate mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Each year, stroke-related death and disability claim over 143 million years of healthy life globally. Despite accounting for much of the global stroke burden, acute stroke care in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries remains suboptimal. Thrombolysis, an effective treatment option for stroke, is only received by a minority of stroke patients in these settings.

AIM

To determine the context-specific barriers and facilitators for the implementation of mainstream stroke thrombolysis in a Ghanaian hospital.

METHODS

We employed a mixed-methods approach involving key stakeholders (recipients, providers, and leaders) in the acute stroke care continuum. Surveys were administered to acute stroke patients, and in-depth key informant interviews were conducted with experts in stroke care, including a neurologist, medical director, neurology residents, a stroke nurse, emergency physicians, a radiologist, and a pharmacist. The data collected from these interviews were transcribed and analysed using content analysis with the CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) model as a guiding template. Two independent coders were involved in the analysis process to ensure reliability and accuracy.

RESULTS

The stroke thrombolysis rate over a 6-month period was 0.83% (2 out of 242), with an average door-to-needle time among thrombolyzed patients being 2 hours, 37 minutes. Only 12.8% of patients (31 out of 242) presented within 4.5 hours of stroke symptom onset. The most significant obstacle to the implementation of acute stroke thrombolysis was related to the characteristics of the individuals involved, notably delays in presenting to the hospital among stroke patients due to a lack of knowledge about stroke symptoms and cultural beliefs. Additionally, a significant bottleneck that contributed to the discrepancy between the number of patients who presented within the 4.5-6 hour window and the number of patients who actually received thrombolysis was the inability to pay for the cost of thrombolytic agents. This was followed by challenges in the implementation processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Addressing challenges related to stroke awareness, and financial constraints via multi-level stakeholder engagement, and enactment of stroke protocols are crucial steps in ensuring a successful implementation of a stroke thrombolysis program in a resource-limited setting.

Gender disparity versus equality in acute stroke: a Middle Eastern country hospital-based study

Background

Acute stroke management is well-established in developed countries with no gender difference. Yet, in developing countries there are reports on gender disparity in medical services including stroke services. Egypt, a developing low-middle-income country, heavily populated, in the Middle East is a good example to answer whether acute ischemic stroke service is provided equally to males and females or there is disparity in risk factors, onset to door (OTD), door to needle (DTN), and outcome. The current study was prospective observational analytical hospital-based study, on acute ischemic stroke cases admitted to Nasr city insurance hospital stroke unit between September 2020 and September 2022.

Results

350 cases were included, 257 males and 93 females. Hypertension was the commonest risk factor 66% males and 81% females P = 0.011, atrial fibrillation was predominant in females P < 0.001, smoking was predominant in males P < 0.001. Median OTD in hours was 8.0 among both genders with minimum zero and maximum 96 h in males compared to minimum 1 and maximum 120 h in females, DTN was around 30 min with no significant difference. Median NIHSS on which rtPA was administered was 12.5 (6-13) in females compared to 10 (6-12) in males. Males who did not receive rtPA had a better mRS on discharge and on 90 days P = 0.01, 0.009, respectively, while there was no significant difference on discharge and 90 days between both genders on receiving rtPA.

Conclusions

No gender disparity was found in DTN, discharge outcome, and 90 days among rtPA recipients. Females tended to have higher NIHSS and relatively delayed presentation to ER with less favorable outcome at discharge and 90 days in case of not receiving rtPA. Encouraging earlier arrival and conducting awareness campaigns for risk factors management is warranted.

Reasons withholding intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in an Indonesian Tertiary Center

Background

Intravenous thrombolysis is the current therapy of choice in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While highly effective, the rate at which the procedure is employed is low. Studies evaluating the causes withholding thrombolytic treatment in developing nations remain scarce. We aim to determine the factors withholding thrombolytic treatment in AIS patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of AIS patients at Siloam Hospitals Lippo Village, Indonesia, in a 10-month period between April 2019 to February 2020. Patient data were collected from the medical records.

Results

One hundred and forty-five cases of AIS were found within a 10-month period (April 2019 to February 2020). Thrombolysis was performed in 6.90% of all patients with AIS (21.28% when adjusted for eligible patients with onset ≤ 4.5 h). Prehospital delay exceeding 4.5 h was the most common cause of withholding thrombolytic treatment (68.28% of patients present above 4.5 h or with unknown onset). Among patients presenting ≤ 4.5 h, causes withholding thrombolysis include clinical improvement (35.14%), mild non-disabling symptoms (32.43%), patient/family refusal (18.92%), extensive infarction (5.41%), seizures at onset (2.7%), as well as history of acute bleeding diathesis (2.7%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (2.7%).

Conclusions

Prehospital delay constitutes the primary obstacle toward receiving thrombolytic therapy for AIS, especially in developing countries. Among patients with onset below 4.5 h, other notable causes include clinical improvement, mild non-disabling symptoms, and patient/family refusal. Of note, the rate of patient/family refusal in our study was much higher compared to previous findings, which may reflect possible socio-economic, communication, or educational issues.

In-Hospital Emergency Treatment Delay Among Chinese Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke: Relation to Hospital Arrivals and Implications for Triage Pathways

Introduction

Timely access to emergency treatment during in-hospital care phase is critical for managing the onset of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), particularly in developing countries. We aimed to explore in-hospital emergency treatment delay and the relation of door-to-needle (DTN) time to ambulance arrivals vs walk-in arrivals.

Methods

Data were collected from 1276 Chinese AIS patients admitted to a general, tertiary-level hospital for intravenous thrombolysis. Information on patients' characteristics and time taken during in-hospital emergency treatment was retrieved from the hospital registry data and medical records. Ambulance arrival was defined as being transported by emergency ambulance services, while walk-in arrival was defined as arriving at hospital by regular vehicle. In-hospital emergency treatment delay occurred when the DTN time exceeded 60 minutes. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to explore the association between hospital arrivals (by ambulance vs by walk-in) and treatment delay after adjustment for age, sex, education, marital status, residence, medical insurance, number of symptoms, clinical severity and survival outcome.

Results

Over half (53.76%) of patients aged over 60 years. Around one-fifth (20.61%) of patients admitted to hospital through emergency ambulance services, while their counterparts arrived by regular vehicle. Overall, the median time taken from the hospital door to treatment initiation was 86.0 minutes. Patients arrived by ambulance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.744, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.185-2.566, p = 0.005), had higher socio-economic status (aOR = 1.821, 95% CI = 1.251-2.650; p = 0.002), or paid out-of-pocket (aOR = 2.323, 95% CI = 1.764-3.060; p < 0.001) had an increased likelihood of in-hospital emergency treatment delays.

Conclusion

In-hospital emergency treatment delay is common in China, and occurs throughout the entire emergency treatment journey. Having a triage pathway involving hospital arrival by ambulance seems to be more likely to experience in-hospital emergency treatment delay. Further efforts to improve triage pathways may require qualitative evidence on provider- and institutional-level factors associated with in-hospital emergency treatment delay.

Outcome and characteristics of COVID-19 patients associated with stroke: a multicenter hospital-based study in Egypt

Background

 Nearly 55 percent of patients are said to be affected by the neurological effects of COVID-19. COVID-19 was shown to be related with stroke in 0.9 to 5% of people. It's critical to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. The goal of this study was to look at the outcomes and characteristics of patients who had an acute ischemic stroke due to covid-19 infection.

Results

 The participants in this study were 399 people who had had a stroke. COVID-19 positivity was confirmed in 77 cases, while COVID-19 negativity was confirmed in 322. In the COVID-19 and control groups, the average age of the patients was 65.4 ± 10.2 and 65.3 ± 11.8, respectively. The Covid-19 and control groups had a mean stroke onset of 5.2 ± 2.1 and 5.7 ± 3.8 h, respectively (P = 0.12). There was a high in-hospital mortality rate among patients with COVID-19 with a rate of 11.7% compared to 4.04% among the control group (P = 0.02). At discharge, the number of patients with mRS > 2 was higher (P = 0.001) among the COVID-19. There was a correlation between the mean levels of D-Dimer (r = 0.668, P < 0.001), the severity of COVID-19 (r = 0.802, P < 0.001), and mRS > 2.

Conclusion

Despite receiving equal acute care as non-COVID-19 patients, COVID-19 patients had more severe strokes and had worse outcomes. This includes a high chance of death while in the hospital as well as a significant level of disability. Neurologists should use timely and effective therapies, particularly for patients who are at a higher risk of having a stroke. This includes elderly patients, patients with severe COVID-19, patients with high levels of D-Dimer, and those with high NIHSS.

Global burden of the COVID-19 associated patient-related delay in emergency healthcare: a panel of systematic review and meta-analyses

Background

Apart from infecting a large number of people around the world and causing the death of many people, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have changed the healthcare processes of other diseases by changing the allocation of health resources and changing people’s access or intention to healthcare systems.

Objective

To compare the incidence of endpoints marking delayed healthcare seeking in medical emergencies, before and during the pandemic.

Methods

Based on a PICO model, medical emergency conditions that need timely intervention was selected to be evaluated as separate panels. In a systematic literature review, PubMed was quarried for each panel for studies comparing the incidence of various medical emergencies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Markers of failure/disruption of treatment due to delayed referral were included in the meta-analysis for each panel.

Result

There was a statistically significant increased pooled median time of symptom onset to admission of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients; an increased rate of vasospasm of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage; and perforation rate in acute appendicitis; diabetic ketoacidosis presentation rate among Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus patients; and rate of orchiectomy among testicular torsion patients in comparison of pre-COVID-19 with COVID-19 cohorts; while there were no significant changes in the event rate of ruptured ectopic pregnancy and median time of symptom onset to admission in the cerebrovascular accident (CVA) patients.

Conclusions

COVID-19 has largely disrupted the referral of patients for emergency medical care and patient-related delayed care should be addressed as a major health threat.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-022-00836-2.

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke response times: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 presents a risk for delays to stroke treatment. We examined how COVID-19 affected stroke response times.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify articles covering stroke during COVID-19 that included time metrics data pre- and post-pandemic. For each outcome, pooled relative change from baseline and 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses comparing comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) to non-CSCs.

RESULTS

38 included studies reported on 6109 patients during COVID-19 and 14 637 patients during the pre-COVID period. Pooled increases of 20.9% (95% CI 5.8% to 36.1%) in last-known-well (LKW) to arrival times, 1.2% (-2.9% to 5.3%) in door-to-imaging (DTI), 0.8% (-2.9% to 4.5%) in door-to-needle (DTN), 2.8% (-5.0% to 10.6%) in door-to-groin (DTG), and 19.7% (11.1% to 28.2%) in door-to-reperfusion (DTR) times were observed during COVID-19. At CSCs, LKW increased by 24.0% (-0.3% to 48.2%), DTI increased by 1.6% (-3.0% to 6.1%), DTN increased by 3.6% (1.2% to 6.0%), DTG increased by 4.6% (-5.9% to 15.1%), and DTR increased by 21.2% (12.3% to 30.1%). At non-CSCs, LKW increased by 12.4% (-1.0% to 25.7%), DTI increased by 0.2% (-2.0% to 2.4%), DTN decreased by -4.6% (-11.9% to 2.7%), DTG decreased by -0.6% (-8.3% to 7.1%), and DTR increased by 0.5% (-31.0% to 32.0%). The increases during COVID-19 in LKW (p=0.01) and DTR (p=0.00) were statistically significant, as was the difference in DTN delays between CSCs and non-CSCs (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors during COVID-19 resulted in significantly delayed LKW and DTR, and mild delays in DTI, DTN, and DTG. CSCs experience more pronounced delays than non-CSCs.