Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: A scoping review

Artifical intelligence in surgery: ethical considerations in the light of social trends in the perception of health and medicine

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine and surgery is currently predicted to be very promising. However, AI has the potential to change the doctor's role and the doctor-patient relationship. It has the potential to support people's desires for health, along with the potential to nudge or push people to behave in a certain way. To understand these potentials, we must see AI in the light of social developments that have brought about changes in how medicine's role, in a given society, is understood. The trends of 'privatisation of medicine' and 'public-healthisation of the private' are proposed as a contextual backdrop to explain why AI raises ethical concerns different from those previously caused by new medical technologies, and which therefore need to be addressed specifically for AI.

Machine learning and deep learning for the diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis- a scoping review

Background and objectives

Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) are novel technologies that can facilitate early diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and predict better patient-specific treatments. We aim to provide the current update on their use at different stages of AS diagnosis and treatment, describe different types of techniques used, dataset descriptions, contributions and limitations of existing work and ed to identify gaps in current knowledge for future works.

Methods

We curated the data of this review from the PubMed database. We searched the full-text articles related to the use of ML/DL in the diagnosis and treatment of AS, for the period 2013-2023. Each article was manually scrutinized to be included or excluded for this review as per its relevance.

Results

This review revealed that ML/DL technology is useful to assist and promote early diagnosis through AS patient characteristic profile creation, and identification of new AS-related biomarkers. They can help in forecasting the progression of AS and predict treatment responses to aid patient-specific treatment planning. However, there was a lack of sufficient-sized datasets sourced from multi-centres containing different types of diagnostic parameters. Also, there is less research on ML/DL-based AS treatment as compared to ML/DL-based AS diagnosis.

Conclusion

ML/DL can facilitate an early diagnosis and patient-tailored treatment for effective handling of AS. Benefits are especially higher in places with a lack of diagnostic resources and human experts. The use of ML/DL-trained models for AS diagnosis and treatment can provide the necessary support to the otherwise overwhelming healthcare systems in a cost-effective and timely way.

Recommended Requirements and Essential Elements for Proper Reporting of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Tools in Biomedical Research and Scientific Publications

Essential elements required for proper use of artificial intelligence machine learning tools in biomedical research and scientific publications include (1) explanation justifying why a machine learning approach contributes to the purpose of the study; (2) description of the adequacy of the data (input) to produce the desired results (output); (3) details of the algorithmic (i.e., computational) approach including methods for organizing the data (preprocessing); the machine learning computational algorithm(s) assessed; on what data the models were trained; the presence of bias and efforts to mitigate these effects; and the methods for quantifying the variables (features) most influential in determining the results (e.g., Shapley values); (4) description of methods, and reporting of results, quantitating performance in terms of both model accuracy and model calibration (level of confidence in the model's predictions); (5) availability of the programming code (including a link to the code when available-ideally, the code should be available); (6) discussion of model internal validation (results applicable and sensitive to the population investigated and data on which the model was trained) and external validation (were the results investigated as to whether they are generalizable to different populations? If not, consideration of this limitation and discussion of plans for external validation, i.e., next steps). As biomedical research submissions using artificial intelligence technology increase, these requirements could facilitate purposeful use and comprehensive methodological reporting.

Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

As large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly integrated into different aspects of health care, questions about the implications for medical academic literature have begun to emerge. Key aspects such as authenticity in academic writing are at stake with artificial intelligence (AI) generating highly linguistically accurate and grammatically sound texts.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare human-written with AI-generated scientific literature in orthopedics and sports medicine.

METHODS

Five original abstracts were selected from the PubMed database. These abstracts were subsequently rewritten with the assistance of 2 LLMs with different degrees of proficiency. Subsequently, researchers with varying degrees of expertise and with different areas of specialization were asked to rank the abstracts according to linguistic and methodological parameters. Finally, researchers had to classify the articles as AI generated or human written.

RESULTS

Neither the researchers nor the AI-detection software could successfully identify the AI-generated texts. Furthermore, the criteria previously suggested in the literature did not correlate with whether the researchers deemed a text to be AI generated or whether they judged the article correctly based on these parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary finding of this study was that researchers were unable to distinguish between LLM-generated and human-written texts. However, due to the small sample size, it is not possible to generalize the results of this study. As is the case with any tool used in academic research, the potential to cause harm can be mitigated by relying on the transparency and integrity of the researchers. With scientific integrity at stake, further research with a similar study design should be conducted to determine the magnitude of this issue.

Reliability of artificial intelligence in predicting total knee arthroplasty component sizes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to investigate the reliability of AI predictive models of intraoperative implant sizing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Four databases were searched from inception till July 2023 for original studies that studied the reliability of AI prediction in TKA. The primary outcome was the accuracy ± 1 size. This review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS criteria.

RESULTS

A total of four observational studies comprised of at least 34,547 patients were included in this review. A mean MINORS score of 11 out of 16 was assigned to the review. All included studies were published between 2021 and 2022, with a total of nine different AI algorithms reported. Among these AI models, the accuracy of TKA femoral component sizing prediction ranged from 88.3 to 99.7% within a deviation of one size, while tibial component sizing exhibited an accuracy ranging from 90 to 99.9% ± 1 size.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the potential of AI as a valuable complement for planning TKA, exhibiting a satisfactory level of reliability in predicting TKA implant sizes. This predictive accuracy is comparable to that of the manual and digital templating techniques currently documented in the literature. However, future research is imperative to assess the impact of AI on patient care and cost-effectiveness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023446868.

Enhanced deep learning model enables accurate alignment measurement across diverse institutional imaging protocols

BACKGROUND

Achieving consistent accuracy in radiographic measurements across different equipment and protocols is challenging. This study evaluates an advanced deep learning (DL) model, building upon a precursor, for its proficiency in generating uniform and precise alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs irrespective of institutional imaging differences.

METHODS

The enhanced DL model was trained on over 10,000 radiographs. Utilizing a segmented approach, it separately identified and evaluated regions of interest (ROIs) for the hip, knee, and ankle, subsequently integrating these regions. For external validation, 300 datasets from three distinct institutes with varied imaging protocols and equipment were employed. The study measured seven radiologic parameters: hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, weight-bearing line ratio, joint line obliquity angle, and lateral distal tibial angle. Measurements by the model were compared with an orthopedic specialist's evaluations using inter-observer and intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Additionally, the absolute error percentage in alignment measurements was assessed, and the processing duration for radiograph evaluation was recorded.

RESULTS

The DL model exhibited excellent performance, achieving an inter-observer ICC between 0.936 and 0.997, on par with an orthopedic specialist, and an intra-observer ICC of 1.000. The model's consistency was robust across different institutional imaging protocols. Its accuracy was particularly notable in measuring the hip-knee-ankle angle, with no instances of absolute error exceeding 1.5 degrees. The enhanced model significantly improved processing speed, reducing the time by 30-fold from an initial 10-11 s to 300 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhanced DL model demonstrated its ability for accurate, rapid alignment measurements in full-leg radiographs, regardless of protocol variations, signifying its potential for broad clinical and research applicability.

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Regenerative Orthopedics: A Paradigm Shift in Patient Care

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into regenerative orthopedics heralds a paradigm shift in clinical methodologies and patient management. This review article scrutinizes AI's role in augmenting diagnostic accuracy, refining predictive models, and customizing patient care in orthopedic medicine. Focusing on innovations such as KeyGene and CellNet, we illustrate AI's adeptness in navigating complex genomic datasets, cellular differentiation, and scaffold biodegradation, which are critical components of tissue engineering. Despite its transformative potential, AI's clinical adoption remains in its infancy, contending with challenges in validation, ethical oversight, and model training for clinical relevance. This review posits AI as a vital complement to human intelligence (HI), advocating for an interdisciplinary approach that merges AI's computational prowess with medical expertise to fulfill precision medicine's promise. By analyzing historical and contemporary developments in AI, from the foundational theories of McCullough and Pitts to sophisticated neural networks, the paper emphasizes the need for a synergistic alliance between AI and HI. This collaboration is imperative for improving surgical outcomes, streamlining therapeutic modalities, and enhancing the quality of patient care. Our article calls for robust interdisciplinary strategies to overcome current obstacles and harness AI's full potential in revolutionizing patient outcomes, thereby significantly contributing to the advancement of regenerative orthopedics and the broader field of scientific research.

Patients' Views on AI for Risk Prediction in Shared Decision-Making for Knee Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Interview Study

BACKGROUND

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making around knee replacement surgery is increasing, and this technology holds promise to improve the prediction of patient outcomes. Ambiguity surrounds the definition of AI, and there are mixed views on its application in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to explore the understanding and attitudes of patients who underwent knee replacement surgery regarding AI in the context of risk prediction for shared clinical decision-making.

METHODS

This qualitative study involved patients who underwent knee replacement surgery at a tertiary referral center for joint replacement surgery. The participants were selected based on their age and sex. Semistructured interviews explored the participants' understanding of AI and their opinions on its use in shared clinical decision-making. Data collection and reflexive thematic analyses were conducted concurrently. Recruitment continued until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Thematic saturation was achieved with 19 interviews and confirmed with 1 additional interview, resulting in 20 participants being interviewed (female participants: n=11, 55%; male participants: n=9, 45%; median age: 66 years). A total of 11 (55%) participants had a substantial postoperative complication. Three themes captured the participants' understanding of AI and their perceptions of its use in shared clinical decision-making. The theme Expectations captured the participants' views of themselves as individuals with the right to self-determination as they sought therapeutic solutions tailored to their circumstances, needs, and desires, including whether to use AI at all. The theme Empowerment highlighted the potential of AI to enable patients to develop realistic expectations and equip them with personalized risk information to discuss in shared decision-making conversations with the surgeon. The theme Partnership captured the importance of symbiosis between AI and clinicians because AI has varied levels of interpretability and understanding of human emotions and empathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent knee replacement surgery in this study had varied levels of familiarity with AI and diverse conceptualizations of its definitions and capabilities. Educating patients about AI through nontechnical explanations and illustrative scenarios could help inform their decision to use it for risk prediction in the shared decision-making process with their surgeon. These findings could be used in the process of developing a questionnaire to ascertain the views of patients undergoing knee replacement surgery on the acceptability of AI in shared clinical decision-making. Future work could investigate the accuracy of this patient group's understanding of AI, beyond their familiarity with it, and how this influences their acceptance of its use. Surgeons may play a key role in finding a place for AI in the clinical setting as the uptake of this technology in health care continues to grow.

Artifical intelligence use in orthopedics: an ethical point of view

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being utilized in orthopedics practice. Ethical concerns have arisen alongside marked improvements and widespread utilization of AI. Patient privacy, consent, data protection, cybersecurity, data safety and monitoring, bias, and accountability are some of the ethical concerns.

Orthopedic surgeons’ attitudes and expectations toward artificial intelligence: A national survey study

Background/Aim: There is a lack of understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) among orthopedic surgeons regarding how it can be used in their clinical practices. This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of orthopedic surgeons regarding the application of AI in their practices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Turkey among 189 orthopedic surgeons between November 2021 and February 2022. An electronic survey was designed using the SurveyMonkey platform. The questionnaire included six subsections related to AI usefulness in clinical practice and participants’ knowledge about the topic. It also surveyed their acceptance level of learning, concerns about the potential risks of AI, and implementation of this technology into their daily practice Results: A total of 33.9% of the participants indicated that they were familiar with the concept of AI, while 82.5% planned to learn about artificial intelligence in the coming years. Most of the surgeons (68.3%) reported not using AI in their daily practice. The activities of orthopedic associations focused on AI were insufficient according to 77.2% of participants. Orthopedic surgeons expressed concern over AI involvement in the future regarding an insensitive and nonempathic attitude toward the patient (53.5%). A majority of respondents (80.4%) indicated that AI was most feasible in extremity reconstruction. Pelvis fractures were found in the region where the AI system is most needed in the fracture classification (68.7%). Conclusion: Most of the respondents did not use AI in their daily clinical practice; however, almost all surgeons had plans to learn about artificial intelligence in the future. There was a need to improve orthopedic associations’ activities focusing on artificial intelligence. Furthermore, new research including the medical ethics issues of the field will be needed to allay the surgeons’ worries. The classification system of pelvic fractures and sub-branches of orthopedic extremity reconstruction were the most feasible areas for AI systems. We believe that this study will serve as a guide for all branches of orthopedic medicine.

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background

There has been a rapid increase in research applying artificial intelligence (AI) to various subspecialties of orthopaedic surgery, including foot and ankle surgery. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) characterize the topics and objectives of studies using AI in foot and ankle surgery, (2) evaluate the performance of their models, and (3) evaluate their validity (internal or external validation).

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases in December 2022. All studies that used AI or its subsets machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in the setting of foot and ankle surgery relevant to orthopaedic surgeons were included. Studies were evaluated for their demographics, subject area, outcomes of interest, model(s) tested, model(s)' performance, and validity (internal or external).

Results

A total of 31 studies met inclusion criteria: 14 studies investigated AI for image interpretation, 13 studies investigated AI for clinical predictions, and 4 studies were grouped as "other." Studies commonly explored AI for ankle fractures, calcaneus fractures, hallux valgus, Achilles tendon pathologies, plantar fasciitis, and sports injuries. For studies reporting the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), AUCs ranged from 0.64 (poor) to 0.99 (excellent). Two studies (6.45%) reported external validation.

Conclusion

Applications of AI in the field of foot and ankle surgery are expanding, particularly for image interpretation and clinical predictions. Current model performances range from poor to excellent, and most studies lack external validation, demonstrating a need for further research prior to deploying AI-based clinical applications.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Systematic review of artificial intelligence tack in preventive orthopaedics: is the land coming soon?

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe and assess the current stage of the artificial intelligence (AI) technology integration in preventive orthopaedics of the knee and hip joints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted in strict compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Literature databases were searched for articles describing the development and validation of AI models aimed at diagnosing knee or hip joint pathologies or predicting their development or course in patients. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and QUADAS-AI tools.

RESULTS

56 articles were found that meet all the inclusion criteria. We identified two problems that block the full integration of AI into the routine of an orthopaedic physician. The first of them is related to the insufficient amount, variety and quality of data for training, and validation and testing of AI models. The second problem is the rarity of rational evaluation of models, which is why their real quality cannot always be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The vastness and relevance of the studied topic are beyond doubt. Qualitative and optimally validated models exist in all four scopes considered. Additional optimization and confirmation of the models' quality on various datasets are the last technical stumbling blocks for creating usable software and integrating them into the routine of an orthopaedic physician.

Automated Artificial Intelligence-Based Assessment of Lower Limb Alignment Validated on Weight-Bearing Pre- and Postoperative Full-Leg Radiographs

The assessment of the knee alignment using standing weight-bearing full-leg radiographs (FLR) is a standardized method. Determining the load-bearing axis of the leg requires time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a novel algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) for the automated assessment of lower limb alignment. In the first stage, a customized mask-RCNN model was trained to automatically detect and segment anatomical structures and implants in FLR. In the second stage, four region-specific neural network models (adaptations of UNet) were trained to automatically place anatomical landmarks. In the final stage, this information was used to automatically determine five key lower limb alignment angles. For the validation dataset, weight-bearing, antero-posterior FLR were captured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperative images were measured by the operating orthopedic surgeon and an independent physician. Postoperative images were measured by the second rater only. The final validation dataset consisted of 95 preoperative and 105 postoperative FLR. The detection rate for the different angles ranged between 92.4% and 98.9%. Human vs. human inter-(ICCs: 0.85−0.99) and intra-rater (ICCs: 0.95−1.0) reliability analysis achieved significant agreement. The ICC-values of human vs. AI inter-rater reliability analysis ranged between 0.8 and 1.0 preoperatively and between 0.83 and 0.99 postoperatively (all p < 0.001). An independent and external validation of the proposed algorithm on pre- and postoperative FLR, with excellent reliability for human measurements, could be demonstrated. Hence, the algorithm might allow for the objective and time saving analysis of large datasets and support physicians in daily routine.

Industry 5.0 in Orthopaedics

Background

Industrial revolutions play a major role in the development of technologies in various fields. Currently, the world is marching towards softwarization and digitalization. There is an emerging need for conversion of Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0 for technological development and implementation of the same in the digital era. In health care, digitalization emerged in Industry 4.0 revolution. To enhance patient care and quality of life, Industry 5.0 plays a major role in providing patient-centric care and customization and personalization of products. The integration of human intelligence with artificial intelligence provides a precise diagnosis and enhances the recovery and functional outcome of the patients.

Materials and methods

In this manuscript, the domains and limitations of Industry 5.0 and further research on Industry 6.0 were elaborated on to bring out technologies in better health care.

Results

Industry 5.0 lessens the work of medical professionals and integrates software-based diagnosis and management. It provides cost-effective manufacturing solutions with limited resources compared to Industry 4.0. Industry 5.0 focuses on SMART and additive manufacturing of implants, and the development of bio-scaffolds, prosthetics, and instruments. In this manuscript, the domains and limitations of Industry 5.0 and further research on Industry 6.0 were elaborated on to bring out technologies in better health care.

Conclusion

'The personalization and customization of products' are the hallmarks of this evolving Industry 5.0 revolution. The major uplifts in various domains of industry 5.0 such as advanced automation, digitalization, collaborative robots, and personalization bring this an inevitable mechano-scientific technological revolution in this current medical era.

Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Radiography Analysis: A Narrative Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is a rapidly growing field. In orthopedics, the clinical implementations of AI have not yet reached their full potential. Deep learning algorithms have shown promising results in computed radiographs for fracture detection, classification of OA, bone age, as well as automated measurements of the lower extremities. Studies investigating the performance of AI compared to trained human readers often show equal or better results, although human validation is indispensable at the current standards. The objective of this narrative review is to give an overview of AI in medicine and summarize the current applications of AI in orthopedic radiography imaging. Due to the different AI software and study design, it is difficult to find a clear structure in this field. To produce more homogeneous studies, open-source access to AI software codes and a consensus on study design should be aimed for.