1
|
Cuq J, Lapoirie M, Plotton I, Fraison E, Neuville P, Oriol S. [Transmasculine people: Gender affirming hormonal therapy, sexual and reproductive health prevention and care, a medical review and follow-up suggestions]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2024; 52:710-719. [PMID: 39097191 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
Transmasculine individuals have a poor access to health care, mostly regarding the sexual and reproductive health. Despite a lack of official guidelines, they need a gynecological follow-up, the aim of this review was to describe it. The present study involved an exhaustive search of MEDLINE, 68 articles were included to analyze the impact of hormonal therapy, prevention, and care regarding sexual and reproductive health of transmasculine individuals. Despite a lack of solid data, the global literature agrees that transmasculine individuals require sexual and reproductive health care. Care must be adapted to each pathway and may be impacted by gender-affirming care. The cancer risk does not seem to be increased in this population, particularly in relation to hormonal therapy. Prevention programs do not differ from those offered to cis women in the absence of gender-affirming surgeries. Transmasculine individuals require follow-up and care adapted to their needs and their pathways. Healthcare professionals must be trained to provide such care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Cuq
- Hospices civils de Lyon, université Claude-Bernard, Lyon, France.
| | - Marion Lapoirie
- Service de médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Ingrid Plotton
- Service de médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Eloise Fraison
- Service de médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor J, Hall R, Langton T, Fraser L, Hewitt CE. Care pathways of children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 2024; 109:s57-s64. [PMID: 38594052 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of children and adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria/incongruence are being referred to specialist gender services. However, little is currently known about the proportions accessing different types of care and treatment following referral. AIM This systematic review examines the range of care pathways of children/adolescents (under 18) referred to specialist gender or endocrinology services. METHODS Database searches were performed (April 2022), with results assessed independently by two reviewers. Peer-reviewed articles providing data for numbers of children and/or adolescents at referral/assessment and their treatment pathways were included. A narrative approach to synthesis was used and where appropriate proportions were combined in a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS 23 studies across nine countries were included, representing 6133 children and/or adolescents with a median age at assessment of 14-16 and overall a higher percentage of birth-registered females. Of those assessed, 36% (95% CI 27% to 45%) received puberty suppression, 51% (95% CI 40% to 62%) received masculinising or feminising hormones, 68% (95% CI 57% to 77%) received puberty suppression and/or hormones and 16% (95% CI 10% to 24%) received surgery. No study systematically reported information about the full pathway or psychological care received by children/adolescents. Follow-up in many studies was insufficient or unclear. Reasons for discontinuation were rarely provided. CONCLUSIONS Prospective studies with long-term follow-up reporting information about the full range of pathways are needed to understand what happens to children and adolescents referred to specialist gender services. Information about provision of psychological care is needed considering high rates of psychosocial difficulties in this population. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021289659.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Taylor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ruth Hall
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Trilby Langton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lorna Fraser
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stanley JR, Ratnapalan S. Patient education and counselling of fertility preservation for transgender and gender diverse people: A scoping review. Paediatr Child Health 2024; 29:231-237. [PMID: 39045475 PMCID: PMC11261822 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxad050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To examine patient education, counselling practices, decision aids, and education resources related to fertility preservation for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth and young adults. Methods A scoping review was conducted using a comprehensive literature search (Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed Medline, OVID Embase, Ovid PsychoINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) conducted from 1806 to October 21, 2022. Inclusion criteria involved abstracts and articles on patient education, counselling, decision aids or education resources regarding fertility preservation for TGD youth and adults. Results Of 1,228 identified articles and abstracts, only six articles met inclusion criteria. Three key themes were identified: (1) patient education and counselling practices (n = 4), with majority of patients receiving fertility preservation counselling at their respective centres; (2) decision aids and strategies for clinicians on fertility preservation for TGD individuals (n = 2) and; (3) patient education resources (n = 1). There was a paucity of literature on decision aids and patient education resources. Conclusions This study highlights the need to further develop and evaluate decision aids for healthcare providers and patient education resources, including eLearning modules, around fertility preservation for TGD individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua R Stanley
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Savithiri Ratnapalan
- Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steininger J, Knaus S, Kaufmann U, Ott J, Riedl S. Treatment trajectories of gender incongruent Austrian youth seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1258495. [PMID: 38774227 PMCID: PMC11106449 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1258495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to describe the treatment trajectories of Austrian children and adolescents with gender incongruence seeking gender-affirming medical care. Methods Patients who presented with gender incongruence at the pediatric outpatient clinic for differences in sex development at a large university hospital in Austria from January 2008 to December 2022 were included in a retrospective chart review, and analyzed regarding referral numbers, patient characteristics, treatment trajectories, fertility preservation, and legal gender marker changes. Results Of 310 eligible patients, 230 (74.2%) were assigned female at birth (AFAB), and 80 (25.8%) were assigned male at birth (AMAB). The number of referrals increased steeply from 2008 to 2018, whereafter it stabilized at around 50 per year. At the time of initial presentation, the median age of patients was 15.6 years (IQR 14.3-16.8). AMAB individuals tended to be younger (median 14.9 years, IQR 13.9-16.8) than AFAB individuals (median 15.8 years, IQR 14.4-16.8; p= 0.012). 207 (66,8%) completed the assessment process and were eligible for gender affirming medical treatment (GAMT). Of those, 89% (186/207) commenced gender affirming hormone therapy in the pediatric outpatient clinic (79/186 received GnRHa monotherapy, 91/186 GnRHa and sex steroids, and 16/186 sex steroid monotherapy). Of the 54 AMAB individuals receiving GAMT, 6 (11.1%) completed fertility preservation prior to therapy initiation. Only 1/132 AFAB adolescents receiving GAMT completed fertility preservation. Chest masculinization surgery was performed in 22 cases (16.7%), and breast augmentation in two cases (3.7%) between the ages of 16 and 18. Changes in legal gender marker were common, with 205 individuals (66.1%) having changed their legal gender marker. Conclusion This is the first time that treatment trajectories, fertility preservation rates, and changes of legal gender marker have been described in Austrian adolescents with gender incongruence seeking GAMT. The majority received GAMT and changed their legal gender marker, while gender affirming surgery rates were low, and utilization of fertility preservation treatment options was rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jojo Steininger
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sarah Knaus
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrike Kaufmann
- Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Ott
- Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Riedl
- Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Anna Kinderspital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
White J, Jackson A, Druce I, Gale J. Oocyte cryopreservation and reciprocal in vitro fertilization in a transgender man on long term testosterone gender-affirming hormone therapy: a case report. F S Rep 2024; 5:111-113. [PMID: 38524208 PMCID: PMC10958692 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To report a successful case of oocyte cryopreservation and subsequent in vitro fertilization (IVF) in a transgender male receiving continued testosterone gender-affirming hormone therapy, followed by reciprocal embryo transfer (ET). Design A case report of a rare case of fertility preservation in a transgender man with concomitant use of testosterone therapy for 4 years before and during ovarian stimulation. Setting Private fertility clinic with university affiliation. Patients A 26-year-old transgender man undergoing oocyte cryopreservation before gender-affirming surgery. Interventions Fertility preservation using oocyte cryopreservation and IVF with reciprocal fresh ET into a cisfemale partner. Main Outcome Measures Successful oocyte cryopreservation, oocyte thawing, and reciprocal IVF cycle. Results Oocyte cryopreservation of 29 mature oocytes. Sixteen mature oocytes survived the thaw, and 12 were fertilized with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A fresh ET of an advanced blastocyst resulted in a clinical pregnancy and live birth. Conclusions Fertility preservation with oocyte cryopreservation or IVF with embryo cryopreservation is feasible for patients on continued long-term testosterone gender-affirming therapy. Future studies on egg quality and reproductive outcomes are required. Our case report demonstrates a promising outcome in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin White
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Fertilty Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Fertilty Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irena Druce
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenna Gale
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Fertilty Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kimmins S, Anderson RA, Barratt CLR, Behre HM, Catford SR, De Jonge CJ, Delbes G, Eisenberg ML, Garrido N, Houston BJ, Jørgensen N, Krausz C, Lismer A, McLachlan RI, Minhas S, Moss T, Pacey A, Priskorn L, Schlatt S, Trasler J, Trasande L, Tüttelmann F, Vazquez-Levin MH, Veltman JA, Zhang F, O'Bryan MK. Frequency, morbidity and equity - the case for increased research on male fertility. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:102-124. [PMID: 37828407 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00820-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Currently, most men with infertility cannot be given an aetiology, which reflects a lack of knowledge around gamete production and how it is affected by genetics and the environment. A failure to recognize the burden of male infertility and its potential as a biomarker for systemic illness exists. The absence of such knowledge results in patients generally being treated as a uniform group, for whom the strategy is to bypass the causality using medically assisted reproduction (MAR) techniques. In doing so, opportunities to prevent co-morbidity are missed and the burden of MAR is shifted to the woman. To advance understanding of men's reproductive health, longitudinal and multi-national centres for data and sample collection are essential. Such programmes must enable an integrated view of the consequences of genetics, epigenetics and environmental factors on fertility and offspring health. Definition and possible amelioration of the consequences of MAR for conceived children are needed. Inherent in this statement is the necessity to promote fertility restoration and/or use the least invasive MAR strategy available. To achieve this aim, protocols must be rigorously tested and the move towards personalized medicine encouraged. Equally, education of the public, governments and clinicians on the frequency and consequences of infertility is needed. Health options, including male contraceptives, must be expanded, and the opportunities encompassed in such investment understood. The pressing questions related to male reproductive health, spanning the spectrum of andrology are identified in the Expert Recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kimmins
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- The Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- The Département de Pathologie et Biologie Cellulaire, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christopher L R Barratt
- Division of Systems Medicine, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Hermann M Behre
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Hospital, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Sarah R Catford
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Geraldine Delbes
- Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Armand-Frappier Sante Biotechnologie, Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael L Eisenberg
- Department of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nicolas Garrido
- IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Brendan J Houston
- School of BioSciences and Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Niels Jørgensen
- Department of Growth and Reproduction, International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Csilla Krausz
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, University Hospital of Careggi Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ariane Lismer
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert I McLachlan
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Monash IVF Group, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suks Minhas
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Imperial, London, UK
| | - Tim Moss
- Healthy Male and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allan Pacey
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lærke Priskorn
- Department of Growth and Reproduction, International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefan Schlatt
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jacquetta Trasler
- Departments of Paediatrics, Human Genetics and Pharmacology & Therapeutics, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Leonardo Trasande
- Center for the Investigation of Environmental Hazards, Department of Paediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank Tüttelmann
- Institute of Reproductive Genetics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Mónica Hebe Vazquez-Levin
- Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de Argentina, Fundación IBYME, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Joris A Veltman
- Biosciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Feng Zhang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Moira K O'Bryan
- School of BioSciences and Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nadgauda AS, Butts S. Barriers to fertility preservation access in transgender and gender diverse adolescents: a narrative review. Ther Adv Reprod Health 2024; 18:26334941231222120. [PMID: 38292918 PMCID: PMC10826369 DOI: 10.1177/26334941231222120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation (FP) involves the cryopreservation of gametes, embryos, and/or gonadal tissue oocytes, for future use in family building. FP as part of a comprehensive approach to care of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals is an understudied topic. Current evidence indicates that gender affirming therapies may increase the risk for infertility. As a result, TGD individuals, including adolescents, should receive counseling regarding FP prior to beginning gender affirming treatment. Many barriers exist to TGD adolescents receiving FP counseling and undergoing FP if desired. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the literature regarding the desire for FP in TGD adolescents, the barriers to TGD adolescents in accessing of FP, and to discuss potential interventions for alleviation of such barriers. A literature search using the following Medical Subject Headings search terms: 'transgender persons' and 'fertility preservation' and 'adolescents' was conducted via searching PubMed. Additional articles were located via reference review. Included articles consist of qualitative and quantitative research and society guidelines. Articles from inception to 1st July 2023 were included. The results of the literature search have been summarized into the format of a narrative review. Key barriers to FP for TGD adolescents include inconsistencies in form and timing of counseling, potential worsening of gender dysphoria with FP treatment, high cost of treatment, limited research on FP outcomes, and legal barriers. Intersectionality between gender identity and other forms of minority status can compound these barriers to FP and healthcare in general. Barriers to TGD adolescents accessing FP are significant. Increased research is needed upon methods to mitigate these barriers. Solutions include increasing uniformity and timing of FP counseling by varying health care providers, advocacy efforts to mitigate legal and financial barriers, increased research efforts in FP outcomes, and increased cultural competency in clinics offering FP care to TGD adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashni S. Nadgauda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reading Hospital – Tower Health, 420 South 5th Avenue, Reading, PA 19611, USA
| | - Samantha Butts
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State – Main Campus, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsonis O, Kopeika J. Clinical management of transgender and non-binary patients in the fertility preservation service: Current evidence. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSGENDER HEALTH 2023; 25:663-680. [PMID: 39465086 PMCID: PMC11500512 DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2023.2284775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
Background: Transgender and non-binary individuals face unique challenges when it comes to fertility preservation (FP). Objective: Despite the growing prevalence of gender dysphoria (GD) and gender transitioning, there is a lack of clear guidelines and consensus on the management of these patients in the FP setting. Clinicians and institutions providing FP services should ensure that they are aware of the needs and circumstances of this underrepresented group of patients and offer them accurate and evidence-based information when counseling and tailoring their FP treatment. Materials and methods: For this scoping review, three major search engines were used. Including Embase, Epistemonikos, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and PubMed. Sources of grey literature were also explored (ResearchGate and Web of Science). The combination of only two keywords [transgender] AND [fertility preservation] was used up to May 2023. Results: The available evidence on clinical management and FP outcomes in transgender patients is limited and mainly originates from case reports or small case series. The main limitation of current FP services for transgender and non-binary individuals is the lack of scientific evidence regarding their care. Discussion: Overall, FP in transgender patients requires individualized and realistic plans, and psychological counseling should be offered. This review aims to provide the latest evidence coming from original studies to facilitate proper counseling and fertility management for these individuals. Conclusions: Inclusive health systems that provide comprehensive reproductive health care to transgender individuals can help them make informed decisions about FP and improve their quality of life. Future research is needed to establish more robust evidence-based guidelines for the management of transgender and non-binary individuals in the FP setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orestis Tsonis
- Specialty Doctor in Assisted Conception, Fertility Preservation Service, Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Julia Kopeika
- Consultant Gynaecologist and Subspecialist in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Lead of the Fertility Preservation Service, Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stolk THR, Asseler JD, Huirne JAF, van den Boogaard E, van Mello NM. Desire for children and fertility preservation in transgender and gender-diverse people: A systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 87:102312. [PMID: 36806443 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The decision to pursue one's desire for children is a basic human right. For transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, gender-affirming care may alter the possibilities to fulfill one's desire for children due to the impact of this treatment on their reproductive organs. We systematically included 76 studies of varying quality describing the desire for children and parenthood; fertility counseling and utilization; and fertility preservation options and outcomes in TGD people. The majority of TGD people expressed a desire for children. Fertility preservation utilization rates were low as there are many barriers to pursue fertility preservation. The most utilized fertility preservation strategies include oocyte vitrification and sperm banking through masturbation. Oocyte vitrification showed successful outcomes, even after testosterone cessation. Sperm analyses when banking sperm showed a lower quality compared to cis male samples even prior to gender-affirming hormone treatment and an uncertain recovery of spermatogenesis after discontinuing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T H R Stolk
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J D Asseler
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - J A F Huirne
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - E van den Boogaard
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - N M van Mello
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Walton E, Abhari S, Tangpricha V, Futral C, Mehta A. Family Planning and Fertility Counseling Perspectives of Gender Diverse Adults and Youth Pursuing or Receiving Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy. Urology 2023; 171:244-250. [PMID: 36404476 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe family planning and fertility counseling perspectives of reproductive-age gender diverse adults and youth pursuing gender affirming hormone therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a cross sectional survey study of gender diverse adults and youth pursuing or receiving gender affirming hormone therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were parental desire and priorities for fertility preservation. RESULTS Fifty-seven individuals (46 adults and 11 youths) completed the survey; 51% were transgender women, 35% were transgender men, and 14% identified as non-binary. 32 participants expressed interest in (n = 15, 26%) or uncertainty about (n = 18, 32%) future parenthood. 48% of participants had considered gamete cryopreservation, but only 7% each previously completed or planned to pursue this fertility option; 67% cited cost as a barrier. Participants with interest in or uncertainty about future parenthood were more likely to consider cryopreservation (P <.001) or stopping hormones for fertility preservation (P <.001). 58% of respondents reported discussing fertility preservation with a health care provider with lower rates among youth participants (P = .017). From a family planning perspective, 58% of respondents described counseling as adequate; 23% described it as inadequate and 19% reported not receiving any counseling. Participants who endorsed strong or uncertain parental desire were more likely to report inadequate counseling (P = .016). CONCLUSION Gender diverse individuals interested in or undecided about future parenthood were more likely to consider cryopreservation and report inadequate family planning counseling. Therefore, current counseling practices may be insufficient and referral to a fertility specialist should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Walton
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sina Abhari
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vin Tangpricha
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipids, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Akanksha Mehta
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fertility Preservation and Reproductive Potential in Transgender and Gender Fluid Population. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092279. [PMID: 36140377 PMCID: PMC9496568 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The gender diverse and transgender community is a minor patient group that is encountered with increasing frequency in the clinical setting, attributed to the improved awareness and access to medical facilities. Partial impairment to permanent elimination of fertility potential and outcomes depending on the treatment modality usually is a result of gender-affirming therapy, which includes both hormone therapy and surgical intervention. Although seldom conducted in the clinical field, transgender patients should be counseled on their fertility preservation options prior to medical and surgical gender transition. There is relatively limited data and clinical information regarding fertility preservation for transgender individuals. Current treatment regimens are based on protocols from fertility preservation after oncological treatments. Major barriers for the transgender population exist due to the lack of information provided and clinical narrative that is not familiar to the physician or health care provider, although there are various options for fertility preservation. A deeper understanding of this clinical agenda and the mandatory processes will ultimately result in a much more comprehensive and specific care for transgender individuals who are in great need for fertility counseling or treatment options that concern fertility preservation. In this review, current clinical approaches will be summarized and fertility preservation options along with ongoing and future clinical trials in fertility preservation for transgender individuals will be thoroughly reviewed.
Collapse
|