Comparison of risks of arterial thromboembolic events and glaucoma with ranibizumab and aflibercept intravitreous injection: A nationwide population‐based cohort study

Systemic Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Associated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic events between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and sham injections.

DESIGN

Random-effects meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2005 to August 2023. Our inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on systemic arteriovenous events for standard dose intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for any indication.

RESULTS

A total of 20 RCTs reporting on 12,833 eyes were included. There was no significant difference in the risk of any thrombotic event between bevacizumab 1.25 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (Risk ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.52-1.75, P = .89). There was no significant difference between bevacizumab and ranibizumab when restricting to arterial thrombotic events (RR= 0.88, 95% CI = 0.60-1.30, P = .53) or venous thrombotic events (RR = 1.99, 95% CI =86 0.68-5.82], P = .21). The risk of arterial thrombotic events was similar between aflibercept and bevacizumab (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.60-2.07, P = .74), between aflibercept and ranibizumab (RR= 0.77, 95% CI = 0.49-1.21, P = .26), between brolucizumab and aflibercept (RR= 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.38, P = .27), and between aflibercept and faricimab (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.43-2.17, P = .93). Compared to sham, neither dose of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 0.3 mg) showed a higher risk of arterial thrombotic events.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a similar risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic adverse events between anti-VEGF agents and between ranibizumab and sham injections.

A Pharmacovigilance Study of Drug-Induced Glaucoma Utilizing the Japanese Adverse Event Reporting System

Purpose

Clinically, glaucoma is a serious problem because it is asymptomatic until a relatively late stage in most cases, which can lead to delays in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The purpose of this study was to clarify the rank-order of the association of glaucoma with the causative drugs using a spontaneous reporting system database.

Methods

Data were extracted from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (Japan). Based on reports of glaucoma caused by all drugs, we calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for glaucoma.

Results

Among 609 reports of adverse events corresponding to glaucoma (46%, women), the most frequently implicated drug were steroids (prednisolone, betamethasone sodium phosphate, triamcinolone acetonide, and fluorometholone), pregabalin, ranibizumab, crizotinib, tacrolimus hydrate, darbepoetin alfa, and foscarnet sodium hydrate. Among 207 reports involved in angle-closure glaucoma (86%, women), anticholinergic drug and antidepressants ranked high and showed signals. Signals were also detected in bromazepam (ROR, 69.7; 95% CI, 30.9-157.5), oral brotizolam (ROR, 16.6; 95% CI, 6.18-44.8), and oral milnacipran hydrochloride (ROR, 22.8; 95% CI, 8.46-61.4) for angle-closure glaucoma.

Conclusion

A national pharmacovigilance database enabled us to identify the drugs that frequently induce glaucoma. The likelihood of the reporting of glaucoma varied among the drugs, which should be used carefully in clinical practice to avoid it.

Risk analysis for patients with arterial thromboembolic events after intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept injections

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been increasingly applied in the treatment of retinal neovascular diseases. Concerns have arisen that these intravitreal agents may be associated with a potential risk of arterial thromboembolic (ATE) events. We conducted a retrospective, nationwide population-based cohort study to analyze the risks for ATE events in patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) or intravitreal aflibercept (IVA). Data (2011-2018) were obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify the risk factors for ATEs. Of the total 3,469 patients, 1393 and 2076 patients received IVR and IVA, respectively. In our result, 38 ATEs occurred within 6 months after IVR or IVA. The risk of ATEs was lower in patients receiving IVR than in those receiving IVA (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.66). Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) exhibited a higher risk of ATEs than did those without CAD (aHR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.41-8.53). The risk of ATEs was higher in patients with an event of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or ischemic stroke (IS) within 6 months prior to index IVI than in those without recent AMI/IS events (aHR, 23.8; 95% CI, 7.35-77.2 and IS: aHR, 290.2; 95% CI, 103.1-816.4). In conclusion, compared with IVA, IVR was associated with a lower risk of ATEs. When strategies for anti-VEGF agents are devised, risk factors, such as CAD and a history of AMI or IS within 6 months should be considered. Further large-scale studies are warranted to elucidate the safety of anti-VEGF injections.

Risk of Intraocular Pressure Increase With Intravitreal Injections of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors: A Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Intraocular pressure increase (IOPi) after intravitreal injections of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) might be different among different VEGFis (bevacizumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of IOPi among new users of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in nondiabetic patients in Tuscany, Italy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Tuscan regional administrative database was used to identify subjects with a first VEGFi intravitreal injection between 2011 and 2020, followed to first incidence of IOPi. Diabetic subjects, those with pre-existing IOPi, or previous use of dexamethasone implants were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression analyses (intention-to-treat and as treated) were conducted to evaluate risk of IOPi among aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, adjusting for potential confounding variables. IOPi was defined as the first record of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9-CM) code 365 or use of 2 glaucoma drugs dispensations within 180 days of each other.

RESULTS

We identified 6585 new users of VEGFis: 1749 aflibercept, 1112 bevacizumab, and 3724 ranibizumab. Women made up 60% of the cohort, with a mean age of 73.6 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for incident IOPi, compared with aflibercept, was higher for bevacizumab (HR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.64-2.95) and ranibizumab users (HR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.46-2.42), respectively. The HRs remained robust after exclusion of patients with proxy of retinal vascular occlusion. As treated analysis confirmed such results (bevacizumab: HR = 3.76, 95% CI = 2.30-6.17; ranibizumab: HR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.62-3.82).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found an increased risk of IOPi among nondiabetic patients with ranibizumab and bevacizumab compared with aflibercept. Future studies are needed to validate these findings.