Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study

Telehealth counseling plus mHealth intervention for cannabis use in emerging adults: Development and a remote open pilot trial

INTRODUCTION

To improve treatment access for emerging adults with cannabis use disorder (CUD), we developed a telehealth counseling-plus-mHealth intervention and remotely conducted a single-arm open pilot study to preliminarily evaluate its feasibility in primary care.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team including youth developed the intervention using the structure of the MOMENT intervention: two weekly counselor-delivered Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) sessions, then two weeks of smartphone surveys (4 prompted/day) querying socioemotional contexts and cannabis use, with pre-programmed messages on report of personal triggers for use (Ecological Momentary Intervention; EMI). The team adapted the MET for virtual delivery; created material to enhance self-reflection, plan behavior change, and anticipate withdrawal; shortened the sessions; and tested them with five youth actors. EMI messages were created to align with the MET and programmed to minimize repetition. Patients aged 18-25 using recreational cannabis ≥3 days/week were recruited from an urban medical practice. Participants received the intervention and responded to surveys on satisfaction and burden. At baseline, post-intervention, and two months, participants reported behavior change readiness/importance/confidence and cannabis use. EMI engagement was calculated as % days with ≥1 phone survey completed.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible patients enrolled; 79 % used cannabis daily/near-daily and 100 % reported use problems. All completed both MET sessions and responded to EMI surveys. All agreed/strongly agreed that they felt respected by, comfortable with, and trust for the counselor and that the activities and discussion were helpful; all rated the MET sessions as very good/excellent. Technical issues were infrequent and minor. Median EMI engagement was 100 % (≥1 report/day) in each week. Behavior change confidence was higher post-intervention and importance and confidence were higher at two months vs. baseline. By two months, 11 participants had started to change cannabis use; median percent days of use in the past 30 days declined by 27 % and average times of use per use day declined by 28 %. All rated intervention quality as good, very good, or excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Emerging adults were highly satisfied and engaged with a telehealth MET counseling-plus-mHealth EMI intervention for cannabis use and reported higher motivation to change cannabis use and less use post-intervention and at 2-month follow-up.

Motivation to participate and attrition factors in a COVID-19 biobank: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The Biobanque québécoise de la COVID-19 (Quebec Biobank for COVID-19, or BQC19) is a provincial initiative that aims to manage the longitudinal collection, storage, and sharing of biological samples and clinical data related to COVID-19. During the study, BQC19 investigators reported a high loss-to-follow-up rate. The current study aimed to explore motivational and attrition factors from the perspective of BQC19 participants and health care and research professionals.

METHODS

This was an inductive exploratory qualitative study. Using a theoretical sampling approach, a sample of BQC19 participants and professionals were invited to participate via semi-structured interviews. Topics included motivations to participate; participants' fears, doubts, and barriers to participation; and professionals' experiences with biobanking during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with BQC19 participants (n = 23) and professionals (n = 17) from 8 clinical data collection sites. Motivations included the contribution to science and society in crisis, self-worth, and interactions with medical professionals. Reasons for attrition included logistical barriers, negative attitudes about public health measures or genomic studies, fear of clinical settings, and a desire to move on from COVID-19. Motivations and barriers seemed to evolve over time and with COVID-19 trends and surges. Certain situations were associated with attrition, such as when patients experienced indirect verbal consent during hospitalization. Barriers related to human and material resources and containment/prevention measures limited the ability of research teams to recruit and retain participants, especially in the ever-evolving context of crisis.

CONCLUSION

The pandemic setting impacted participation and attrition, either by influencing participants' motivations and barriers or by affecting research teams' ability to recruit and retain participants. Longitudinal and/or biobanking studies in a public health crisis setting should consider these factors to limit attrition.