Clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with imported donor corneas in eyes of Asian patients; endothelium-in versus endothelium-out method

Risk factors for early graft detachment requiring rebubbling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with imported pre-cut donor tissues

Graft detachment is a common and significant complication in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). We investigated the risk factors of graft detachment requiring rebubbling after DMEK using imported pre-cut donor tissues. The medical records of 48 patients who underwent DMEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) or bullous keratopathy (BK) at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Donor, recipient, and surgical factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Graft detachment requiring rebubbling occurred in 17 (32.7%) eyes. The detachment group exhibited older recipient age (p = 0.006), higher prevalence of diabetes (p = 0.001), and a higher proportion of FED (65%, p = 0.003). Notably, the detachment group demonstrated a significantly lower postoperative 2-h intraocular pressure (IOP) (p = 0.002) and a greater proportion of eyes with IOP <20 mmHg (p < 0.001). Older recipient age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.17), diabetes (OR 23.8, 95% CI 2.61-217), FED surgical indication (OR 6.19, 95% CI 1.74-22.0), lower postoperative 2-h IOP (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38), and postoperative 2-h IOP <20 mmHg (OR 14.0, 95% CI 1.64-119) were associated with increased odds of graft detachment. According to multivariate logistic regression, lower postoperative 2-h IOP (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47) and postoperative 2-h IOP <20 mmHg (OR 25.1, 95% CI 1.05-602) increased the risk of graft detachment. Lower postoperative 2-h IOP, particularly below 20 mmHg, may increase the risk of graft detachment, and diabetes in recipients may pose a higher risk of graft detachment after DMEK.

New forceps free injection technique for delivering descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty preloaded endothelium-in grafts

PURPOSE

To describe a new method for delivering DMEK grafts into the recipient's eye with endothelium inward configuration using a no-forceps injection technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively review 11 patients that underwent DMEK surgery at our institution using a no-forceps injection technique. The graft was preloaded into an intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and connected to an anterior chamber maintainer (ACM). A 5 ml non luer lock syringe was inserted into the other end of the ACM to create a one-flow system. The cartridge was inserted into the posterior end of an injector, and the graft was successfully delivered into the recipient's eye.

RESULT

Twelve eyes of 11 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 9.16 ± 1.3 months. At baseline, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.76 ± 0.13 logMAr and mean endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2619.00 ± 115.89 cells/mm2. At follow-up, BCVA significantly improved to 0.22 ± 0.05 logMAR (p = 0.003). Although we observed a significant reduction in ECD at follow-up (1688 ± 182.20, p = 0.002), our patients lost only 35.69 ± 6.36% of endothelial cells.

CONCLUSION

Our technique can help surgeons safely deliver an endothelium-in graft into the recipient's eye. The method doesn't require the use of a forceps, minimizing the risk of endothelial cell loss or graft damage.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Preloaded Imported Graft

PURPOSE

Although the popularity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is increased, there is still few clinical studies in Korea. In this study, we aimed to report the initial clinical outcomes of DMEK in patients followed up for more than 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 96 eyes that underwent DMEK by a single surgeon for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, or other indications were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative complications, and graft survival.

RESULTS

The postoperative BCVA significantly increased compared to the preoperative BCVA by 59.4% (1.00 ± 0.77 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.67 ± 0.76 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, p < 0.001). The average preoperative ECD was 754 ± 382 cells/mm2, increasing to 1,333 ± 562 cells/mm2 at 3 months (76.8%, p < 0.001), 1,334 ± 632 cells/mm2 at 6 months (76.9%, p < 0.001), 1,121 ± 474 cells/mm2 at 12 months (48.7%, p = 0.024), and 972 ± 458 cells/mm2 at 24 months postoperatively (28.9%, p = 0.445). Compared to 3 months, the ECD declined by 15.9% at 12 months (p = 0.009) and 27.1% at 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.158). The average CCT was 675 ± 113 μm preoperatively, decreasing to 581 ± 102, 574 ± 101, and 594 ± 94 μm at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK, respectively (p < 0.001 between all follow-up time points). Allograft rejection was detected in three (3.1%) and 14 eyes (14.6%) underwent retransplantation at an average of 10.1 ± 8.4 months after DMEK.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is promising for maintaining corneal clarity, low postoperative complication rates, and stable graft longevity.

Risk Factors for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Rejection: Current Perspectives- Systematic Review

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a corneal endothelial transplantation procedure with selective removal of a patient's defective Descemet membrane and endothelium. It is replaced with a healthy donor Descemet membrane and endothelium without a stromal component. Corneal graft rejection can be at the level of epithelium, stroma as well endothelium. DMEK graft rejection is relatively less common than rejection with DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty, and a good outcome may be achieved with prompt management. The clinical picture of DMEK rejection is usually similar to endothelial rejection in Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK), which generally manifests as pain, redness, reduction in visual acuity, stromal edema, endothelial rejection line, keratic precipitates at the back of the cornea and corneal neovascularization. However, more subtle forms of rejection or immune reactions are more common in DMEK compared to DSAEK eyes. Early clinical diagnosis, prompt intervention, and meticulous management safeguard visual acuity and graft survival in these cases. Intensive topical steroids form the mainstay in the management of DMEK rejection. Sometimes, oral or intravenous steroids or other systemic immunomodulators may be required. DMEK graft failure can be primary or secondary, and failure usually requires a second procedure in the form of repeat DMEK or DSEK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). A detailed literature search was performed using search engines such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and Google books, and a comprehensive review on DMEK rejection was found to be lacking. This review is a comprehensive update on the risk factors, pathophysiology, primary and secondary graft failure, recent advances in diagnosis, prevention of rejection, and updates in the management of DMEK rejection. The review also discusses the differential diagnosis of DMEK failure and rejection, prognosis, and future perspectives considering DMEK failure and rejection.

The Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) "Wave Maneuver"

A novel technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft handling and centration without the endothelium touching the posterior part of the anterior chamber (AC), is presented here. It is particularly suitable for vitrectomized eyes, deep AC, and AC intraocular lenses (ACIOLs), potentially reducing surgery time and endothelial cell loss during surgery. This retrospective interventional case series includes 27 eyes with complex ocular pathology. All utilized a “Wave maneuver” to center an early elevated graft without completing graft centration on the bottom of the AC. Successful graft attachment and centration were evaluated intra and post-operatively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and donor endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured pre-operatively, and three and six months post-operatively. DMEK grafts were successfully attached and centered in all cases. No maneuver-related complications were observed intraoperatively. BCVA improved from a pre-operative 0.2 ± 0.63, to 0.43 ± 0.49 and 0.76 ± 0.51 at the three- and six-month follow-ups, respectively (p < 0.01). CCT decreased from a pre-operative 742 ± 118, to 546 ± 87 and 512 ± 67 at three and six months, respectively (p < 0.01). ECD decreased from 2878 ± 419 cells/mm2 to 1153 ± 466 cells/mm2 at three and six months, respectively (p < 0.01). The “Wave maneuver” may be very beneficial in DMEK cases where the AC is either very deep or the bottom of the AC is compromised. The “Wave maneuver” learning curve was brief.