Influence of pharmacists and infection control teams or antimicrobial stewardship teams on the safety and efficacy of vancomycin: A Japanese administrative claims database study

Trends in teicoplanin loading dose implementation from 2010 to 2019 and evaluation of safety and efficacy factors: a retrospective cohort study based on a Japanese administrative claims database

BACKGROUND

The loading dose of teicoplanin (TEIC) is recommended for implementation. However, there is significant discrepancy between the dose settings in the package insert and, in the guidelines, and the actual status of loading doses in Japan is unclear. Furthermore, TEIC causes liver injury as side effect. Although the risk of developing liver injury has not been reported to be increased following a loading dose based on the guidelines, there is a lack of reports in large populations. Therefore, we evaluated the trend in the loading dose and factors affecting the efficacy and safety of TEIC administration.

METHODS

A Japanese administrative claims database was used in this study. Trends in loading doses were evaluated in target populations administered TEIC between 2010 and 2019. Patient characteristics were adjusted by propensity score matching based on the guideline group (total dose of 3 days > 1,600 mg) and non-guideline group (≤ 1,600 mg) of the loading dose. Finally, univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting 30-day mortality and liver injury.

RESULTS

A total of 10,030 patients were selected based on these criteria. The proportion of loading doses based on the recommended guidelines showed an increase over time, regardless of the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), but especially so in cases where TDM was implemented, the loading doses were administered in accordance with the recommendations of the guidelines. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed a relationship between drug management and guidance fees (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36‒0.55), a reimbursement indicating pharmacist intervention, and a reduction in 30-day mortality. In addition, loading doses based on the recommended guidelines had no influence on liver injury, and other factors were not significantly associated with increased incidence of liver injury.

CONCLUSION

Thus, this study implies the benefits of pharmacological management as indicated by drug management and guidance fee and supports the implementation of loading doses based on the guideline on TEIC administration.

Impact of Pharmacist-Led Multidisciplinary Team to Attain Targeted Vancomycin Area under the Curved Monitoring in a Tertiary Care Center in Thailand

Vancomycin Area Under the Curve (AUC) monitoring has been recommended to ensure successful clinical outcomes and minimize the risk of nephrotoxicity, rather than traditional trough concentration. However, vancomycin AUC monitoring by a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary team (PMT) has not been well established in Southeast Asia. This study was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital. Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted and received intravenous vancomycin ≥48 h were included. The pre-PMT period (April 2020-September 2020) was defined as a period using traditional trough concentration, while the post-PMT period (October 2020-March 2021) was defined as a period using PMT to monitor vancomycin AUC. The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of the therapeutic target of an AUC/MIC ratio of 400-600. There was a significantly higher rate of achievement of therapeutic target vancomycin AUC during post-PMT period (66.7% vs. 34.3%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in the clinical cure rate (92.4% vs. 69.5%, p < 0.001) and reduction in 30-day ID mortality (2.9% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.017) during the post-PMT period. Our study demonstrates that PMT was effective to help attain a targeted vancomycin AUC, improve the clinical cure rate, and reduce 30-day ID mortality. This intervention should be encouraged to be implemented in Southeast Asia.

Trends in Implementation of Loading Dose of Voriconazole from 2010 to 2019 and Influencing Factors of Loading Dose Based on a Japanese Administrative Claim Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study

A loading dose of voriconazole (VRCZ) is recommended to increase its blood concentration at an early stage. However, the trends in the implementation of the loading dose in VRCZ in Japan has not yet been clarified. In addition, although pharmacists play many important roles in antimicrobial stewardship, the effect of pharmacist intervention on the implementation of a loading dose of VRCZ has not yet been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the implementation of loading dose of VRCZ and the influencing factors of loading dose. This study used an administrative claims database that included patients who received injectable VRCZ between 2010 and 2019. The implementation of loading doses in the VRCZ was evaluated annually. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors influencing loading dose. Overall, 2197 patients were included. The implementation rate of the loading dose remained below 65% throughout the study period. Among medical fees that can be calculated through pharmacist intervention, only the infection prevention and control premium significantly increased the implementation of loading dose of VRCZ (odds ratio: 1.587, 95% confidence interval: 1.053-2.392). In conclusion, antifungal stewardship may have been promoted at medical institutions that established infection prevention and control. In the future, pharmacists will need to intervene more actively from the beginning of VRCZ administration.