1
|
Lim AH, Ab Rahman N, Nasarudin SNS, Velvanathan T, Fong MCC, Mohamad Yahaya AH, Sivasampu S. A comparison between antibiotic utilisation in public and private community healthcare in Malaysia. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:79. [PMID: 38172715 PMCID: PMC10762925 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are two parallel systems in Malaysian primary healthcare services: government funded public primary care and privately-owned practices. While there have been several studies evaluating antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian public healthcare, there is a lack of literature on the use of antibiotics in the private sector. There is a dire need to evaluate the more recent performance of public vs. private community healthcare in Malaysia. As such, this study aimed at measuring and comparing the utilisation of antibiotics in the public and private community healthcare sectors of Malaysia in 2018-2021. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian primary care for the period of 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 using the nationwide pharmaceutical procurement and sales data from public and private health sectors. Rates of antibiotic utilisation were reported as Defined Daily Doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) and stratified by antibiotic classes. The secondary analysis included proportions of AWaRe antibiotic category use for each sector and proportion of antibiotic utilisation for both sectors. RESULTS The overall national antibiotic utilisation for 2018 was 6.14 DID, increasing slightly to 6.56 DID in 2019, before decreasing to 4.54 DID in 2020 and 4.17 DID in 2021. Private primary care antibiotic utilisation was almost ten times higher than in public primary care in 2021. The public sector had fewer (four) antibiotic molecules constituting 90% of the total antibiotic utilisation as compared to the private sector (eight). Use of Access antibiotics in the public sector was consistently above 90%, while use of Access category antibiotics by the private sector ranged from 64.2 to 68.3%. Although use of Watch antibiotics in the private sector decreased over the years, the use of Reserve and 'Not Recommended' antibiotics increased slightly over the years. CONCLUSION Antibiotic consumption in the private community healthcare sector in Malaysia is much higher than in the public sector. These findings highlight the need for more rigorous interventions targeting both private prescribers and the public with improvement strategies focusing on reducing inappropriate and unnecessary prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Huili Lim
- Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
| | - Norazida Ab Rahman
- Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Siti Nur Su'aidah Nasarudin
- Pharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Tineshwaran Velvanathan
- Pharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Mary Chok Chiew Fong
- Pharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Abdul Haniff Mohamad Yahaya
- Pharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Sheamini Sivasampu
- Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiee SF, Joo LK, Eng PN, Simon Sumeh A, Jantim A, Shanmuganathan S, Muniandy SR. At the Heart of the Community: Implementation of Echocardiographic Screening for Rheumatic Heart Disease in Primary Care Facilities of Northern Borneo Island. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241233178. [PMID: 38420774 PMCID: PMC10906056 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241233178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a potentially life-threatening condition that causes long-standing public health concerns. Echocardiography is a reliable diagnostic and screening technique for many cardiovascular conditions, including RHD. It is commonly used in tertiary care facilities worldwide but less so in the community setting. The primary aim of this study was to introduce and elaborate on the echocardiographic screening for RHD that was implemented by a Malaysian primary care clinic in Penampang district, Sabah. We also set out to present the uptake of the service in its initial years of establishment, as well as the challenges faced. METHODS In the first part of this study, document reviews were conducted to compile relevant information about the conceptualization and implementation of this service. Following that, we also obtained secondary data on the echocardiographic screening service from its first implementation in April 2020 until May 2021 to examine the uptake and the patient profile. RESULTS From April 2020 to May 2021, a total of 189 echocardiographic screening was conducted by primary care doctors using handheld ultrasound. Of the 189 children screened, 19 (10.1%) were found to have cardiac anomalies and were referred for a formal echocardiogram. Upon follow-up, 8 were detected with mild mitral regurgitation and referred to the nearest tertiary hospital for further management. CONCLUSION Based on our review, the echocardiographic screening for RHD among children conducted by the Penampang Health Clinic was deemed successful. Echocardiogram service provided by primary care centers located in suburban and rural areas is highly beneficial for patients with poor access to specialized health care services because they stay far away from tertiary care facilities. Tapping into family medicine physicians located closer to communities to conduct echocardiographic screening and review the results can improve the detection of cardiac anomalies requiring further investigation. With the success of this project, echocardiographic services in the primary healthcare setting can be expanded by garnering the necessary collaborative efforts and consistent support from various stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lim Kai Joo
- Penampang District Health Office, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Pee Nai Eng
- Penampang District Health Office, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Aini Simon Sumeh
- Penampang District Health Office, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Anisah Jantim
- Penampang District Health Office, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
| | - Selvanaayagam Shanmuganathan
- Penampang District Health Office, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
- The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Siva Rao Muniandy
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital II, Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohd Ujang IR, Hamidi N, Ab Hamid J, Awang S, Zulkifli NW, Supadi R, Mohamed NE, Sooryanarayana R. The COVID-19 pandemic and disruptions to maternal and child health services in public primary care Malaysia: a retrospective time-series analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e013397. [PMID: 37949498 PMCID: PMC10649372 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Maintaining essential health services, including maternal and child health (MCH), while addressing the pandemic is an enormous task. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the utilisation of MCH services in Malaysian public primary care. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using national administrative data from 1124 public primary care clinics. Eight indicators were selected to measure service utilisation covering antenatal, postnatal, women's health, child health, and immunisation services. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate changes in levels and trends of indicators during four different periods: pre-pandemic (January 2019-February 2020), during pandemic and first lockdown (March-May 2020), after the first lockdown was lifted (June-December 2020) and after the second lockdown was implemented (January-June 2021). RESULTS Most indicators showed no significant trend in monthly utilisation prior to the pandemic. The onset of the pandemic and first lockdown implementation were associated with significant decreasing trends in child health (-19.23%), women's health (-10.12%), antenatal care (-8.10%), contraception (-6.50%), postnatal care (-4.85%) and postnatal care 1-week (-3.52%) indicators. These indicators showed varying degrees of recovery after the first lockdown was lifted. The implementation of the second lockdown caused transient reduction ranging from -11.29% to -25.92% in women's health, contraception, child and two postnatal indicators, but no sustained reducing trend was seen afterwards. Two immunisation indicators appeared unaffected throughout the study period. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted MCH services utilisation in Malaysia. While most MCH services were negatively affected by the lockdown implementation with varying degrees of recovery, infant immunisation showed resilience throughout. This highlights the need for a targeted preparedness plan to ensure the resilience of MCH services in future crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izzatur Rahmi Mohd Ujang
- Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Normaizira Hamidi
- Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Jabrullah Ab Hamid
- Centre for Health Equity Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Samsiah Awang
- Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | | | - Roslina Supadi
- Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Nur Ezdiani Mohamed
- Centre for Healthcare Quality Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, Ministry of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | - Rajini Sooryanarayana
- Family Health Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jamal MH, Abdul Aziz AF, Aizuddin AN, Aljunid SM. Gatekeepers in the health financing scheme: Assessment of knowledge, attitude, practices, and participation of Malaysian private general practitioners in the PeKa B40 scheme. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292516. [PMID: 37847678 PMCID: PMC10581488 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This is cross-sectional research done to assess the readiness of the private Malaysian general practitioners (GPs) for the implementation of the national health financing scheme. The study focused on their levels of knowledge and attitudes towards the types of health financing scheme, gatekeeper roles in the health financing scheme, and their participation in the PeKa B40 scheme. Their acceptance and level of participation in the national health financing scheme (NHFS) were also assessed. A set of self-designed and pre-tested questionnaires focusing on the aforementioned objectives were mailed to the respondents. The selection of respondents was done by stratified random sampling of the GPs in all 14 Malaysian states at both urban and rural levels. Out of a calculated number of 362 GPs targeted, 296 responses were received which represented a response rate of 81.7%. The respondents had a mean age of 50.7 years 165 (55.75%) were males and 131 (44.3%) were females. The rural respondents totalled 158 (53.4%) as compared to those from urban 138 (46.6%) areas. The outcomes observed were that GPs with PeKa B40 provider status, positive attitude towards health financing schemes, gatekeeper roles, and PeKa B40, were strongly associated with their acceptance and level of participation in the NHFS. The GPs possessed a positive attitude and were generally ready to participate in the NHFS, but the lower scores in knowledge levels would require definite education and training plans to further enhance their readiness. More incentives should be given to GPs to enrol as PeKa B40 providers. The results of this study should be strongly considered by the government in the efforts to engage the Malaysian private GPs in the forthcoming NHFS. Most importantly, the role of GPs as gatekeepers needed to be implemented, and the PeKa B40 scheme be greatly improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Husni Jamal
- University of Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
- Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Aznida Firzah Abdul Aziz
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
| | - Azimatun Noor Aizuddin
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
- International Centre for Casemix and Clinical Coding, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Syed Mohamed Aljunid
- International Centre for Casemix and Clinical Coding, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yunus NA, Russell G, Muhamad R, Soh SE, Sturgiss E. The perceptions of healthcare practitioners on obesity management in Peninsular Malaysia: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:744. [PMID: 37430243 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09759-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practitioners' perceptions of patients with obesity and obesity management shape their engagement in obesity care delivery. This study aims to describe practitioners' perceptions, experiences and needs in managing patients with obesity, determine the extent of weight stigma among health practitioners, and identify the factors associated with negative judgment towards patients with obesity. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from May to August 2022 with health practitioners commonly involved in obesity management in Peninsular Malaysia, including doctors in primary care, internal medicine and bariatric surgery, and allied health practitioners. The survey explored practitioners' perceptions, barriers and needs in managing obesity, and evaluated weight stigma using the Universal Measures of Bias - Fat (UMB Fat) questionnaire. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical-related factors associated with higher negative judgment towards patients with obesity. RESULTS A total of 209 participants completed the survey (completion rate of 55.4%). The majority (n = 196, 94.3%) agreed that obesity is a chronic disease, perceived a responsibility to provide care (n = 176, 84.2%) and were motivated to help patients to lose weight (n = 160, 76.6%). However, only 22% (n = 46) thought their patients were motivated to lose weight. The most frequently reported barriers to obesity discussions were short consultation time, patients' lack of motivation, and having other, more important, concerns to discuss. Practitioners needed support with access to multi-disciplinary care, advanced obesity training, financing, comprehensive obesity management guidelines and access to obesity medications. The mean (SD) of the UMB Fat summary score was 2.99 (0.87), with the mean (SD) domain scores ranging between 2.21 and 4.36 (1.06 to 1.45). No demographic and clinical-related factors were significantly associated with negative judgment from the multiple linear regression analyses. CONCLUSION Practitioners in this study considered obesity a chronic disease. While they had the motivation and capacity to engage in obesity management, physical and social opportunities were the reasons for not discussing obesity with their patients. Practitioners needed more support to enhance their capability and opportunity to engage with obesity management. Weight stigma in healthcare settings in Malaysia should be addressed, given the possibility of hindering weight discussions with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nor Akma Yunus
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia.
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
| | - Grant Russell
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosediani Muhamad
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Sze-Ee Soh
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sturgiss
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goh SSL, Lai PSM, Ramdzan SN, Tan KM. Weighing the necessities and concerns of deprescribing among older ambulatory patients and primary care trainees: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:136. [PMID: 37391698 PMCID: PMC10311750 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02084-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing can be a challenging and complex process, particularly for early career doctors such as primary care trainees. To date, there is limited data from patients' and doctors' perspectives regarding the deprescribing of medications in older persons, particularly from developing countries. This study aimed to explore the necessities and concerns of deprescribing in older persons among older ambulatory patients and primary care trainees. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted among patients and primary care trainees (known henceforth as doctors). Patients aged ≥ 60 years, having ≥ 1 chronic disease and prescribed ≥ 5 medications and could communicate in either English or Malay were recruited. Doctors and patients were purposively sampled based on their stage of training as family medicine specialists and ethnicity, respectively. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic approach was used to analyse data. RESULTS Twenty-four in-depth interviews (IDIs) with patients and four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 23 doctors were conducted. Four themes emerged: understanding the concept of deprescribing, the necessity to perform deprescribing, concerns regarding deprescribing and factors influencing deprescribing. Patients were receptive to the idea of deprescribing when the term was explained to them, whilst doctors had a good understanding of deprescribing. Both patients and doctors would deprescribe when the necessity outweighed their concerns. Factors that influenced deprescribing were doctor-patient rapport, health literacy among patients, external influences from carers and social media, and system challenges. CONCLUSION Deprescribing was deemed necessary by both patients and doctors when there was a reason to do so. However, both doctors and patients were afraid to deprescribe as they 'didn't want to rock the boat'. Early-career doctors were reluctant to deprescribe as they felt compelled to continue medications that were initiated by another specialist. Doctors requested more training on how to deprescribe medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheron Sir Loon Goh
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | - Pauline Siew Mei Lai
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
- School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Sunway City, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia.
| | - Siti Nurkamilla Ramdzan
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | - Kit Mun Tan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lim AH, Ab Rahman N, Hashim H, Kamal M, Velvanathan T, Chok MCF, Sivasampu S. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Antibiotic Utilisation in Malaysian Primary Care Clinics: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12040659. [PMID: 37107021 PMCID: PMC10135109 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a dramatic change in the delivery of primary healthcare across the world, presumably changing trends in consultations for infectious diseases and antibiotic use. This study aimed at describing and evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on antibiotic use in public primary care clinics in Malaysia between 2018 and 2021. Data from the nationwide procurement database of systemic antibiotics from public primary care clinics in Malaysia between January 2018 and December 2021 were analysed using interrupted time series analysis. The monthly number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) was calculated and grouped by antibiotic class. The trend of antibiotic utilisation rates had been decreasing by 0.007 DID monthly before March 2020 (p = 0.659). With the introduction of national lockdown due to COVID-19 beginning March 2020, there was a significant reduction in the level of antibiotic utilisation rates of 0.707 (p = 0.022). Subsequently, the monthly trend showed a slight upward change until the end of the study period (p = 0.583). Our findings indicate that there was a significant decrease in antibiotic utilisation for systemic use in primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the preceding years (January 2018–March 2020).
Collapse
|