Aldosterone Assays: An Urgent Need for Improvement

Primary aldosteronism - a multidimensional syndrome

Primary aldosteronism is a common cause of hypertension and is a risk factor for cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality, via mechanisms mediated by both hypertension and direct insults to target organs. Despite its high prevalence and associated complications, primary aldosteronism remains largely under-recognized, with less than 2% of people in at-risk populations ever tested. Fundamental progress made over the past decade has transformed our understanding of the pathogenesis of primary aldosteronism and of its clinical phenotypes. The dichotomous paradigm of primary aldosteronism diagnosis and subtyping is being redefined into a multidimensional spectrum of disease, which spans subclinical stages to florid primary aldosteronism, and from single-focal or multifocal to diffuse aldosterone-producing areas, which can affect one or both adrenal glands. This Review discusses how redefining the primary aldosteronism syndrome as a multidimensional spectrum will affect the approach to the diagnosis and subtyping of primary aldosteronism.

Developing an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for detecting aldosterone in human plasma

BACKGROUND

Accurately measuring plasma aldosterone concentration is difficult but meaningful for primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis.

METHODS

In this study, we developed an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for plasma aldosterone detection, evaluated its performance according to guidelines issued by CLSI, including detection limit, linearity, precision, and compared it with chemiluminescence immunoassay. Then, a reference range of plasma aldosterone in young people was established by using this method.

RESULTS

The lower limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 10 pg/ml. The mean recovery rates of analyte added to serum were 100.07-102.05% in different concentrations. The linearity range was 20-2000 pg/ml. Inter-assay CVs were 2.20-3.97% at aldosterone concentrations of 65.66-854.75 pg/ml. The regression equation of UPLC-MS/MS (x) and chemiluminescence immunoassay (y) was y = 1.002x + 65.854 (r = 0.9456, n = 237). The reference range of plasma aldosterone detected by UPLC-MS/MS was 11.30-363.82 pg/ml in young people in South China, and there was no statistically significant difference in plasma aldosterone concentration between two genders.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, UPLC-MS/MS can rapidly and accurately detect plasma aldosterone and is appropriate for clinical application.

An isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference measurement procedure for aldosterone measurement in human plasma

Accurate quantitation of aldosterone is clinically important in standardized testing for primary aldosteronism. The results are often variable when performed by clinical immunoassays. To standardize and ensure the accuracy of clinical systems, reference measurement procedures (RMPs) with higher metrological order are required. A simple and reliable isotope dilution LC-IDMS/MS-based measurement procedure for human plasma aldosterone has been developed. This method involved plasma spiked with a deuterium-labelled internal standard, equilibrated for 0.5 h, and extracted by liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) without derivatization. Aldosterone and its structural analogues were baseline separated with a C18-packed UHPLC column with gradient elution within 7 min. The signal intensity variability and measurement imprecision were reduced by bracketing calibration during plasma aldosterone value assignment. The limit of detection (LoD) was 19.4 pmol/L with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) > 3. The lowest limit of quantification (LLoQ) was 27.7 pmol/L (S/N > 10 and CV < 10.0%). LLE was performed with 1 mL of n-hexane/ethyl acetate (3:2, v/v), and the extraction recovery was determined to be 92.15 ± 3.54%. The imprecisions were ≤ 3.18% for samples at 124.8, 867.0, and 2628.5 pmol/L. The recoveries were 98.11-101.61%. The relative bias between this candidate RMP and the established RMP was 2.76-1.89%. The linearity response ranged from 27.7 to 2774.4 pmol/L with R² = 0.999. The method performance met the requirements of RMPs (≤ 5% total CV and ≤ 3% bias). Furthermore, the developed method was applied to evaluate immunoassays through 41 patient sample comparisons. The calibration and measurement capability (CMC) of this method were also evaluated by measuring these samples. The candidate RMP can serve as an accurate reference baseline for routine methods and can be used for value assignment for reference materials. Selected ion chromatograms by LC-MS/MS using a C18 column for aldosterone and its structural analogues.

Analytical bias of automated immunoassays for six serum steroid hormones assessed by LC-MS/MS

Introduction

There is a growing amount of evidence showing the significant analytical bias of steroid hormone immunoassays, but large number of available immunoassays makes conduction of a single comprehensive study of this issue hardly feasible. Aim of this study was to assess the analytical bias of six heterogeneous immunoassays for serum aldosterone, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), testosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (OHP) and progesterone using the liquid chromatography coupled to the tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Materials and methods

This method comparison study included 49 serum samples. Testosterone, DHEAS, progesterone and cortisol immunoassays were performed on the Abbott Architect i2000SR or Alinity i analysers (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, USA). DiaSorin’s Liaison (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) and DIAsource’s ETI-Max 3000 analysers (DIAsource ImmunoAssays, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium) were chosen for aldosterone and OHP immunoassay testing, respectively. All immunoassays were evaluated against the LC-MS/MS assay relying on the commercial kit (Chromsystems, Gräfelfing, Germany) and LCMS-8050 analyser (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Analytical biases were calculated and method comparison was conducted using weighted Deming regression analysis.

Results

Depending on the analyte and specific immunoassay, mean relative biases ranged from -31 to + 137%. Except for the cortisol, immunoassays were positively biased. For none of the selected steroids slope and intercept 95% confidence intervals simultaneously contained 0 and 1, respectively.

Conclusions

Evaluated immunoassays failed to satisfy requirements for methods’ comparability and produced significant analytical biases in respect to the LC-MS/MS assay, especially at low concentrations.

Migration from RIA to LC-MS/MS for aldosterone determination: Implications for clinical practice and determination of plasma and urine reference range intervals in a cohort of healthy Belgian subjects

Background

Aldosterone measurement is critical for diagnosis of primary aldosteronism and disorders of the renin-angiotensin system. We developed an LC-MS/MS method for plasma and urinary aldosterone and compared it to our RIA method. We present a reference interval study for a Belgian population.

Methods

68 plasma and 23 urine samples were assayed for as part of a method comparison. For the reference interval study, we enrolled 282 healthy Caucasian volunteers (114 Male: mean age 35 ± 11 y and 168 Female: mean age 42 ± 13 y). A subset of 139 healthy volunteers agreed to a 24-h urine collection. For the method validation, 5 plasma and 8 urine pools were run in triplicate and quadruplicate, respectively, on 3 different days.

Results

Between-run imprecision (CV) was 2.8-5.1% for plasma and 4.5-8.6% for urine, except at the low urine concentration of 2.99 nmol/L where a CV of 15.4% was observed. The limit of quantitation was 0.04 nmol/L for plasma and 6.65 nmol/L for urine. Recoveries, based on spiking experiments into natural matrix, did not differ significantly from 100%. Regression comparisons showed that, on average, RIA generated results were 59% and 11% higher than LC-MS/MS for plasma and urine, respectively. The MS reference interval we propose for plasma aldosterone is 0.07 nmol/L-0.73 nmol/L for women and 0.04 nmol/L-0.41 nmol/L for men. No gender difference was observed for urine aldosterone. The reference interval was determined to be <60.94 nmol/day.

Conclusions

The LC-MS/MS method was validated and reference intervals for plasma and urine were established. A significant bias between RIA and LC-MS/MS was noted.

Molecular genetic studies in a case series of isolated hypoaldosteronism due to biosynthesis defects or aldosterone resistance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hypoaldosteronism is associated with either insufficient aldosterone production or aldosterone resistance (pseudohypoaldosteronism). Patients with aldosterone defects typically present with similar symptoms and findings, which include failure to thrive, vomiting, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis. Accurate diagnosis of these clinical conditions therefore can be challenging. Molecular genetic analyses can help to greatly clarify this complexity. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the clinical and genetic characteristics of patients with aldosterone defects due to biosynthesis defects or aldosterone resistance.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We investigated the clinical and molecular genetic features of 8 consecutive patients with a clinical picture of aldosterone defects seen in our clinics during the period of May 2015 through October 2017. We screened CYP11B2 for aldosterone synthesis defects and NR3C2 and the three EnaC subunits (SCNN1A, SCNN1B and SCNN1G) for aldosterone resistance.

RESULTS

We found 4 novel and 2 previously reported mutations in the genes CYP11B2, NR3C2, SCNN1A and SCNN1G in 9 affected individuals from 7 unrelated families.

CONCLUSION

Molecular genetic investigations can help confidently diagnose these conditions and clarify the pathogenicity of aldosterone defects. This study may expand the clinical and genetic correlations of defects in aldosterone synthesis or resistance.

Rapid Screening of Primary Aldosteronism by a Novel Chemiluminescent Immunoassay

Measurement of plasma aldosterone and renin concentration, or activity, is useful for selecting antihypertensive agents and detecting hyperaldosteronism in hypertensive patients. However, it takes several days to get results when measured by radioimmunoassay and development of more rapid assays has been long expected. We have developed chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays enabling the simultaneous measurement of both aldosterone and renin concentrations in 10 minutes by a fully automated assay using antibody-immobilized magnetic particles with quick aggregation and dispersion. We performed clinical validation of diagnostic ability of this newly developed assay-based screening of 125 patients with primary aldosteronism from 97 patients with essential hypertension. Results of this novel assay significantly correlated with the results of radioimmunoassay (aldosterone, active renin concentration, and renin activity) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (aldosterone). The analytic sensitivity of this particularly novel active renin assay was 0.1 pg/mL, which was better than that of radioimmunoassay (2.0 pg/mL). The ratio of aldosterone-to-renin concentrations of 6.0 (ng/dL per pg/mL) provided 92.0% sensitivity and 76.3% specificity as a cutoff for differentiating primary aldosteronism from essential hypertension. This novel measurement is expected to be a clinically reliable alternative for conventional radioimmunoassay and to provide better throughput and cost effectiveness in diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism from larger numbers of hypertensive patients in clinical settings.

Hypertension: The role of biochemistry in the diagnosis and management

Hypertension is defined as a persistently elevated blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg. It is an important treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, with a high prevalence in the general population. The most common cause, essential hypertension, is a widespread disease - however, secondary hypertension is under investigated and under diagnosed. Collectively, hypertension is referred to as a "silent killer" - frequently it displays no overt symptomatology. It is a leading risk factor for death and disability globally, with >40% of persons aged over 25 having hypertension. A vast spectrum of conditions result in hypertension spanning essential through resistant, to patients with an overt endocrine cause. A significant number of patients with hypertension have multiple cardiovascular risk factors at the time of presentation. Both routine and specialised biochemical investigations are paramount for the evaluation of these patients and their subsequent management. Biochemical testing serves to identify those hypertensive individuals who are at higher risk on the basis of evidence of dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment, or target organ damage and to exclude identifiable causes of hypertension. The main target of biochemical testing is the identification of patients with a specific and treatable aetiology of hypertension. Information gleaned from biochemical investigation is used to risk stratify patients and tailor the type and intensity of subsequent management and treatment. We review the approach to the biochemical investigation of patients presenting with hypertension and propose a diagnostic algorithm for work-up.

Primary Aldosteronism: Changing Definitions and New Concepts of Physiology and Pathophysiology Both Inside and Outside the Kidney

In the 60 years that have passed since the discovery of the mineralocorticoid hormone aldosterone, much has been learned about its synthesis (both adrenal and extra-adrenal), regulation (by renin-angiotensin II, potassium, adrenocorticotrophin, and other factors), and effects (on both epithelial and nonepithelial tissues). Once thought to be rare, primary aldosteronism (PA, in which aldosterone secretion by the adrenal is excessive and autonomous of its principal regulator, angiotensin II) is now known to be the most common specifically treatable and potentially curable form of hypertension, with most patients lacking the clinical feature of hypokalemia, the presence of which was previously considered to be necessary to warrant further efforts towards confirming a diagnosis of PA. This, and the appreciation that aldosterone excess leads to adverse cardiovascular, renal, central nervous, and psychological effects, that are at least partly independent of its effects on blood pressure, have had a profound influence on raising clinical and research interest in PA. Such research on patients with PA has, in turn, furthered knowledge regarding aldosterone synthesis, regulation, and effects. This review summarizes current progress in our understanding of the physiology of aldosterone, and towards defining the causes (including genetic bases), epidemiology, outcomes, and clinical approaches to diagnostic workup (including screening, diagnostic confirmation, and subtype differentiation) and treatment of PA.

Clinical validation for the aldosterone-to-renin ratio and aldosterone suppression testing using simultaneous fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassays

BACKGROUND

As larger numbers of hypertensive patients are screened for primary aldosteronism with the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), automated analyzers present a practical solution for many laboratories. We report the method-specific ARR cutoff determined with direct, automated chemiluminescence immunoassays allowing the simultaneous measurement of plasma aldosterone concentrations (PACs) and plasma renin concentrations (PRCs).

METHODS

Method comparisons to commonly employed assays and tandem mass spectrometry were undertaken. Patients were previously diagnosed based on the local ARR cutoff of 1.2 (ng/dl)/(μIU/ml) in samples collected in upright seated position. Lack of aldosterone suppression in response to salt load to less than 5 ng/dl confirmed primary aldosteronism. For the new assays, the optimal ARR cutoff was established in 152 patients with essential hypertension, 93 with primary aldosteronism and 147 normotensive patients. Aldosterone suppression was assessed in 73 essential hypertensive and 46 primary aldosteronism patients.

RESULTS

PAC and PRC were significantly correlated to values determined with currently available methods (P < 0.001). In patients with primary aldosteronism, patients with essential hypertension and controls, mean (95% confidence interval) PAC was 28.4 (25.4-31.8), 6.4 (5.9-6.9) and 6.2 (5.6-6.9) ng/dl, respectively. In the same groups, PRC was 6.6 (5.6-7.7), 12.9 (11.2-14.8) and 26.5 (22.2-31.5) μIU/ml. An ARR cutoff of 1.12 provided 98.9% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity. Employing the new assay aldosterone suppression confirmed the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension using the cutoff of 5 ng/dl.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that the new assays present a convenient alternative for the measurement of PAC and PRC on a single automated analyzer. Availability of these simultaneous assays should facilitate screening and diagnosis of primary aldosteronism.

Establishment of reference intervals for aldosterone and renin in a Caucasian population using the newly developed Immunodiagnostic Systems specialty immunoassay automated system

BACKGROUND

Measurement of aldosterone and/or renin is essential to aid the differential diagnosis of secondary hypertension, guide strategy for therapeutic management of hypertension and assess adequacy of mineralocorticoid replacement.

AIM

The objective was to establish normative data for aldosterone and renin using the Immunodiagnostic Systems specialty immunoassay system platform in a Caucasian population.

METHODS

Following informed consent, 365 subjects were recruited to this study. Subjects were ambulatory and attended clinic for blood pressure measurement and phlebotomy between the hours of 7:00 and 11:00. Blood pressure was measured according to the 2013 European Society of Hypertension/Cardiology guidelines. The inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, BMI <30 kg/m(2), non-pregnant, blood pressure <140/90, normal electrolytes and kidney function and not taking prescribed/over the counter medications. Ninety-four subjects were excluded based on these criteria. A total of 271 volunteers (females n = 145), aged 18-65 years formed the reference cohort. Blood for aldosterone/renin was collected into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid specimen tubes. Samples were kept at room temperature and transported within 30 min of blood draw to the laboratory for immediate processing (centrifugation, separation and freezing of plasma). Plasma was stored at -20℃ prior to analysis on the Immunodiagnostic Systems specialty immunoassay system instrument.

RESULTS

The established reference intervals in an Irish Caucasian population for renin: females: 6.1-62.7 mIU/L, males: 9.0-103 mIU/L, for aldosterone: females: <138-1179 pmol/L, males: <138-670 pmol/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that reference intervals for aldosterone and renin should be gender specific. These automated immunoassays offer rapid stratification of patients with refractory hypertension and will better facilitate the optimization of therapeutic management.

Method development and validation of liquid chromatography-tandem/mass spectrometry for aldosterone in human plasma: Application to drug interaction study of atorvastatin and olmesartan combination

In the present investigation, a simple and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method was developed for the quantification of aldosterone (ALD) a hormone responsible for blood pressure in human plasma. The developed method was validated and extended for application on human subjects to study drug interaction of atorvastatin (ATSV) and olmesartan (OLM) on levels of ALD. The ALD in plasma was extracted by liquid-liquid extraction with 5 mL dichloromethane/ethyl ether (60/40% v/v). The chromatographic separation of ALD was carried on Xterra, RP-Column C18 (150 mm× 4.6 mm × 3.5 μm) at 30°C followed by four-step gradient program composed of methanol and water. Step 1 started with 35% methanol for first 1 min and changed linearly to 90% in next 1.5 min in Step 2. Step 3 lasted for next 2 min with 90% methanol. The method finally concluded with Step 4 to achieve initial concentration of methanol that is, 35% thus contributing the total method run time of 17.5 min. The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min throughout the process. The developed method was validated for specificity, accuracy, precision, stability, linearity, sensitivity, and recovery. The method was linear and found to be acceptable over the range of 50-800 ng/mL. The method was successfully applied for the drug interaction study of ATSV + OLM in combination against OLM treatment on blood pressure by quantifying changes in levels of ALD in hypertensive patients. The study revealed levels of ALD were significantly higher in ATSV + OLM treatment condition when compared to OLM as single treated condition. This reflects the reason of low effectiveness of ATSV + OLM in combination instead of synergistic activity.

Blood pressure control 1 year after referral to a hypertension specialist

Hypertension is highly prevalent and remains poorly controlled. The purpose of this study was to evaluate blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension 1 year after referral to a hypertension specialist. A retrospective chart review was performed on 158 patients evaluated by a single hypertension specialist between 2005 and 2010 at the Penn Hypertension Program. Patients were included if they had at least 1 year of follow-up and had baseline plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone concentration measured. Drug regimens were adjusted with particular attention to results of renin-aldosterone profiling. Mean BP of the entire cohort decreased from 149/87 mm Hg to 129/78 mm Hg at 1 year (P<.0001), without a significant change in the number of antihypertensive medications. The authors observed that referral to a hypertension specialist was worthwhile and associated with a significant reduction in BP without an increase in the number of BP medications used at 1 year.

Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism is the most common form of secondary hypertension. The detection of primary aldosteronism is of particular importance, not only because it provides an opportunity for a targeted treatment (surgical for APA and medical with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for BAH), but also because it has been extensively demonstrated that patients affected by PA are more prone to cardiovascular events and target organ damage than essential hypertensives. According to the Endocrine Society Guidelines diagnosis of PA is made following a rigorous flow-chart comprising screening, confirmation/exclusion testing and subtype diagnosis. In the present review we describe briefly the published diagnostic strategies of the Guidelines, highlighting new evidence that has become recently available and discuss issues that still need to be addressed by future research.

Measurement of Aldosterone in Human Plasma by Semiautomated HPLC–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Background: Reliable measurement of aldosterone with less interlaboratory variation than RIA would help standardize testing for primary aldosteronism. We set out to validate a high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for aldosterone in human plasma.

Methods: We prepared samples (EDTA plasma, lithium heparin plasma, and serum from separator and plain clot tubes) and measured aldosterone using online HPLC-MS/MS with d7-aldosterone as internal standard. We also analyzed EDTA plasma samples by immunoassay. We established a reference range for HPLC-MS/MS aldosterone by analyzing blood collected midmorning from 97 normotensive seated subjects.

Results: The linear range was 69.4–5548.0 pmol/L (2.5–200 ng/dL) (r2 &gt; 0.994, n = 14). Inter- and intraday analytical recovery and imprecision for quality control samples of 166.4, 1109.6, and 4161.0 pmol/L (6.0, 40.0, and 150.0 ng/dL) were 92.2%–102.0% and &lt;6.3%, respectively (n = 5). The lower limit of quantification was 69.4 pmol/L (2.5 ng/dL), with inter- and intraday analytical recovery and imprecision of 91.4%–94.5% and &lt;9.5% (n = 5). No interferences were observed in plasma from Addison’s disease patients (n = 5). Comparison of collection tubes, using EDTA as the reference, revealed similar aldosterone results. Comparison of HPLC-MS/MS with immunoassay gave an acceptable mean bias (0.83%) but wide range (−44.8% to 39.7%) of differences. HPLC-MS/MS aldosterone concentrations in normotensive subjects ranged from &lt;69.4 to 635.2 pmol/L (&lt;2.5 to 22.9 ng/dL).

Conclusions: This first reported aldosterone method using online HPLC-MS/MS is precise across the clinically relevant range, not influenced by collection tube type, and offers semiautomated sample preparation and high throughput.