How Well Do Laboratories Follow Guidelines on Cardiac Markers? The Cardiac Marker Guideline Uptake in Europe Study

Implementation of high sensitivity troponin into routine clinical practice - results of the extended CARdiac MArkers guideline uptake in Europe group (CARMAGUE) survey

BACKGROUND

Measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) by a high sensitivity method is now the recommended strategy for the detection of myocardial injury. An international survey was undertaken to assess how this has been implemented.

METHODS

A questionnaire based around 14 domains on cardiac biomarkers was distributed electronically with the aid of professional societies accessed by a web link within the invitation. Results were returned electronically then extracted into a relational database for analysis.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 663 laboratories across 76 countries ranging from 1 to 69 largest country. The majority of responses (79.6%) came from the European area. Responses were grouped into broad geographic areas for analysis. Most responses came from hospitals providing a local and regional service of which the majority provided angioplasty. cTn measurement was the dominant biomarker. The majority of laboratories include creatine kinase (CK) in their cardiac profile and approximately 50% also offer the MB isoenzyme of CK. The majority of laboratories (91.9%) measure cTn by a high sensitivity method. Sex specific reference ranges were typically implemented for cardiac troponin I but not for cardiac troponin T. The preferred unit of measurement was nanograms/L. A structured decision-making pathway utilising high sensitivity cTn measurement was used by 83.3% of laboratories who responded. Single sample rule out is common but the majority used serial sampling strategy based on measurement on admission and three hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of cTn by a high sensitivity method is now well established internationally, the use of rapid diagnostic protocols lags behind.

How Well Do Laboratories Adhere to Recommended Guidelines for Cardiac Biomarkers Management in Europe? The CArdiac MARker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) Study of the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine Task Group on Cardiac Markers

BACKGROUND

The CARdiac MARker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CAMARGUE) program is a multi-country audit of the use of cardiac biomarkers in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

An email link to a web-based questionnaire of 30 multiple-choice questions was distributed via the professional societies in Europe.

RESULTS

374 questionnaires were returned from 39 countries, the majority of which were in northern Europe with a response rate of 8.2%-42.0%. The majority of the respondents were from hospitals with proportionately more responses from central hospitals than district hospitals. Cardiac troponin was the preferred cardiac biomarker, evenly split between cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Aspartate transaminase and lactate dehydrogenase are no longer offered as cardiac biomarkers. Creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme, and myoglobin continue to be offered as part of the cardiac biomarker profile in approximately on 50% of respondents. There is widespread utilization of high sensitivity (hs) troponin assays. The majority of cTnT users measure hs-cTnT. 29.5% of laboratories measure cTnI by a non-hs method but there has been substantial conversion to hs-cTnI. The majority of respondents used ng/L and use the 99th percentile as the upper reference limit (71.9% of respondents). A range of diagnostic protocols are in use.

CONCLUSIONS

There is widespread utilization of hs troponin methods. A significant minority do not use the 99th percentile as recommended and there is, as yet, little uptake of very rapid diagnostic strategies. Education of laboratory professionals and clinicians remains a priority.

High sensitivity, contemporary and point-of-care cardiac troponin assays: educational aids developed by the IFCC Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Bio-Markers

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) formed a Task Force on the Application of Cardiac Bio-markers (TF-CB) in 2008, re-designated in 2018 as a committee (C-CB), to produce educational materials on cardiac biomarkers. Established in June 2017, definitive tables covering the majority of high-sensitivity, contemporary and point-of-care (POC) cTn assays have been developed by the C-CB and are available on the IFCC website. These tables provide extensive information about assays' analytical characteristics and encompass information on diagnostic discriminants, particularly the 99th percentiles, as provided by the manufacturers.

Laboratory Medicine is Faced with the Evolution of Medical Practice

Laboratory medicine and clinical medicine are co-dependent components of medicine. Laboratory medicine functions most effectively when focused through a clinical lens. Me dical practice as a whole undergoes change. New drugs, treatments and changes in management strategies are introduced. New techniques, new technologies and new tests are developed. These changes may be either clinically or laboratory initiated, and so their introduction requires dialogue and interaction between clinical and laboratory medicine specialists. Treatment monitoring is integral to laboratory medicine, varying from direct drug measurement to monitoring cholesterol levels in response to treatment. The current trend to »personalised medicine« is an extension of this process with the development of companion diagnostics. Technological innovation forms part of modern laboratory practice. Introduction of new technology both facilitates standard laboratory approaches and permits introduction of new tests and testing strategies previously confined to the research laboratory only. The revolution in cardiac biomarker testing has been largely a laboratory led change. Flexibility in service provision in response to changing clinical practice or evolving technology provides a significant laboratory management challenge in the light of increasing expectations, shifts in population demographics and constraint in resource availability. Laboratory medicine practitioners are adept at meeting these challenges. One thing remains constant, that there will be a constant need laboratory medicine to meet the challenges of novel clinical challenges from infectious diseases to medical conditions developing from lifestyle and longevity.

Identification and Characterization of Cardiac Troponin T Fragments in Serum of Patients Suffering from Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It has been suggested that cTnT is present predominantly in fragmented forms in human serum following AMI. In this study, we have used a targeted mass spectrometry assay and epitope mapping using Western blotting to confirm this hypothesis.

METHODS

cTnT was captured from the serum of 12 patients diagnosed with AMI using an immunoprecipitation technique employing the M11.7 catcher antibody and fractionated with SDS-PAGE. Coomassie-stained bands of 4 patients at 37, 29, and 16 kDa were excised from the gel, digested with trypsin, and analyzed on a Q Exactive instrument set on targeted Selected Ion Monitoring mode with data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for identification. Western blotting employing 3 different antibodies was used for epitope mapping.

RESULTS

Ten cTnT peptides of interest were targeted. By using MS/MS, all of these peptides were identified in the 37-kDa, intact, cTnT band. In the 29- and 16-kDa fragment bands, 8 and 4 cTnT-specific peptides were identified, respectively. Some of these peptides were "semitryptic," meaning that their C-termini were not formed by trypsin cleavage. The C-termini of these semitryptic peptides represent the C-terminal end of the cTnT molecules present in these bands. These results were confirmed independently by epitope mapping.

CONCLUSIONS

Using LC-MS, we have succeeded in positively identifying the 29- and 16-kDa fragment bands as cTnT-derived products. The amino acid sequences of the 29- and 16-kDa fragments are Ser79-Trp297 and Ser79-Gln199, respectively.

How Well Do Laboratories Adhere to Recommended Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Myocardial Infarction: The CARdiac MArker Guidelines Uptake in Europe Study (CARMAGUE)

BACKGROUND

We undertook an assessment of current use of evidence-based guidelines for the use of cardiac biomarkers in Europe (EU) and North America (NA).

METHODS

In 2013–2014 a web-based questionnaire was distributed via NA and EU biochemical societies. Questions covered cardiac biomarkers measured, analytical methods used, decision thresholds, and use of decision-making protocols. Results were collated using a central database and analyzed using comparative and descriptive nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

In EU, returns were obtained from 442 hospitals, 50% central or university hospitals, and 39% from local hospitals from 35 countries with 395/442 (89%) provided an acute service. In NA there were 91 responses (63.7% central or university hospitals, 19.8% community hospitals) with 76/91 (83.5%) providing an acute service. Cardiac troponin was the preferred cardiac biomarker in 99.5% (EU) and 98.7% (NA), and the first line marker in 97.7% (EU) and 97.4% (NA). There were important differences in the choice of decision limits and their derivations. The origin of the information was also significantly different, with EU vs NA as follows: package insert, 61.9% vs 40%; publications, 17.1% vs 15.0%; local clinical or analytical validation choice, 21.0% vs 45.0%; P = 0.0003.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences between EU and NA use of cardiac biomarkers. This probably relates to different availability of assays between EU and NA (such as high-sensitivity troponin assays) and different laboratory practices on assay introduction (greater local evaluation of assay performance occurred in NA).

A national survey of troponin testing and recommendations for improved practice

Background

The introduction of troponin assays with higher analytical sensitivity and enhanced performance has produced new challenges for both laboratory and clinician in the optimal investigation of patients with cardiovascular disease. After some years of collective experience with this new generation of assays, this survey aimed to assess the level of consensus that exists regarding their application.

Methods

A questionnaire was designed, based on a review of published evidence and current opinion, to obtain information on a number of key areas relating to troponin analysis and reporting and was circulated to lead laboratory consultants across the UK and Ireland.

Results

Completed questionnaires were received from 94 laboratory contacts. Sixty per cent of those who responded had implemented a high-sensitivity troponin assay, with the Roche Cobas troponin T high sensitivity assay the most widely used. It is evident that some confusion remains regarding the definition of high-sensitivity assays and there was considerable variation in practice, even among those using the same manufacturer’s assay.

Conclusions

There is a need for greater consensus in the approach to the clinical utilization of troponin assays with improved sensitivity and it is important that laboratories are fully aware of the capabilities of their assay and provide useful guidance to users. On the basis of survey findings and the existing evidence base, a number of recommendations have been proposed to improve current practice and enhance patient safety.

The clinical and diagnostic performance characteristics of the high sensitivity Abbott cardiac troponin I assay

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine the imprecision profile, 99th percentile and diagnostic efficiency of a new high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay.

METHODS

Total imprecision was assessed by following CLSI protocol EP15-A.14. Serum pools prepared from sera of known high cardiac troponin concentrations were adjusted by dilution with serum considered to be troponin free. Determination of the 99th-percentile reference value examined a fully characterized population that had undergone non-invasive cardiac imaging. Diagnostic accuracy utilised samples from the point of care arm of the RATPAC trial (Randomised Assessment of Treatment using Panel Assay of Cardiac markers), set in the emergency departments of six hospitals. Blood samples were taken on admission and 90min from admission. Diagnosis was based on the universal definition of myocardial infarction utilising laboratory measurements of cardiac troponin performed at the participating sites together with measurements performed in a core laboratory and compared by construction of receiver operator characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Total imprecision was 4%-12.1% with 10% CV of 7ng/L. cTnI was measureable in 99.5% of the samples. Troponin values were influenced by gender but not by age. The 99th percentile was 14.8ng/L (18.1 males, 8.6 females). Progressive filtering of the population reduced the 99th percentile. For the diagnosis of MI on admission the area under the curve was 0.92, statistically indistinguishable from four other assays studied (0.90-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The analytical performance of the new assay meets the criteria for a high sensitivity troponin assay.

Do laboratories follow heart failure recommendations and guidelines and did we improve? The CARdiac MArker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CARMAGUE)

BACKGROUND

Natriuretic peptides (NP) are well-established markers of heart failure (HF). During the past 5 years, analytical and clinical recommendations for measurement of these biomarkers have been published in guidelines. The aim of this follow-up survey was to investigate how well these guidelines for measurement of NP have been implemented in laboratory practice in Europe.

METHODS

Member societies of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine were invited in 2009 to participate in a web-based audit questionnaire. The questionnaire requested information on type of tests performed, decision limits for HF, turn-around time and frequency of testing.

RESULTS

There was a moderate increase (12%) of laboratories measuring NP compared to the initial survey in 2006. The most frequently used HF decision limits for B-type NP (BNP) and N-terminal BNP (NT-proBNP) were, respectively, 100 ng/L and 125 ng/L, derived from the package inserts in 55%. Fifty laboratories used a second decision limit. Age or gender dependent decision limits were applied in 10% (8.5% in 2006). The vast majority of laboratories (80%) did not have any criteria regarding frequency of testing, compared to 33% in 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of NP measurement for HF management was a slow process between 2006 and 2009 at a time when guidelines had just been established. The decision limits were derived from package insert information and literature. There was great uncertainty concerning frequency of testing which may reflect the debate about the biological variability which was not published for most of the assays in 2009.

Sensible use of high-sensitivity troponin assays

The first intracellular Ca(2+)-sensor protein to be described was the troponin complex. Only later it was -discovered that cardiac-specific isoforms of troponin I (cTnI) and troponin T (cTnT) exist, and nowadays, measurement of cardiac troponins is a corner stone in the diagnosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). High-sensitivity (hs-) assays have been developed that can record slightly elevated plasma concentrations of cardiac troponins as early as 3 h after onset of clinical symptoms. International guidelines defined a diagnostic cut-off at cardiac troponin levels corresponding to the 99th percentile of a healthy reference population and require that hs-assays measure this concentration with an interassay coefficient of variation ≤10%. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic and prognostic use of cardiac troponins.