Digital PCR: A Sensitive and Precise Method for KIT D816V Quantification in Mastocytosis

High burden of clonal mast cell disorders and hereditary α-tryptasemia in patients who need Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

In patients who require venom immunotherapy (VIT), there is a need to identify underlying mast cell (MC) disorders since these may affect the risk and severity of future sting reactions and the long-term effectiveness of VIT.

METHODS

1319 individuals with Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) who needed VIT from referral centers in Slovenia, Austria, Croatia, and Poland underwent examination for KIT p.D816V in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) using a highly sensitive PCR test and tryptase genotyping by digital droplet PCR. We also included 183 control individuals with large local reactions (LLRs) to Hymenoptera stings and with asymptomatic sensitization to Hymenoptera venoms.

RESULTS

285 of 1319 individuals recommended for VIT (21.6%) were positive for KIT p.D816V in PBL, preferably those who present with severe reaction (33.9% [n = 207 of 610] with Ring-Messmer grade 3-4 vs. 11% [n = 78 of 709] with Grade 1-2; p < .0001), whereas only 1.3% (n = 2 of 152) of controls with LLR and none with asymptomatic sensitization (n = 31) had KIT p.D816V. KIT p.D816V allelic burden was higher in those with severe reaction (median 0.018% [n = 207] in Grade 3-4 vs. 0.001% [n = 78] in Grade 1-2; p < .0001), and the majority had normal baseline serum tryptase levels (69% [n = 196 of 285]). All KIT p.D816V-positive individuals (n = 41) who underwent bone marrow (BM) biopsy were found to have underlying clonal diseases, principally BM mastocytosis. HαT was also associated with severe HVA and symptoms (p < .01), and remarkably, 31.0% (n = 31 of 100) were found to have concomitant KIT p.D816V. Concomitant HαT and KIT p.D816V showed an additive effect, and having both was associated with the highest risk for severe HVA, even higher than having either HαT or KIT p.D816V alone (OR = 3.8; p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

By employing prospective universal tryptase genotyping and examination for KIT p.D816V in PBL in large HVA populations, we have demonstrated a high burden of clonal MC disorders and HαT in patients who require VIT.

Underlying systemic mastocytosis in patients with unexplained osteoporosis: score proposal

BACKGROUND

A score to predict the association between unexplained osteoporosis and an underlying systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at identifying criteria able to predict the diagnosis of SM without skin involvement and provide an indication for bone marrow (BM) assessment.

METHODS

We included 139 adult patients with unexplained osteoporosis and suspected SM. After BM evaluation, 63 patients (45.3 %) were diagnosed with SM, while the remaining 76 patients (54.7 %) negative for clonal mast cell (MC) disorders, constituted our control group. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified three independent predictive factors: age (<54 years: +1 point, >64 years: -1 point), serum basal tryptase (sBT) levels >19 ng/mL (+2 points) and vertebral fractures (+2 points).

RESULTS

These variables were used to build the OSTEO-score, able to predict the diagnosis of SM before BM assessment with a sensitivity of 73.5 % and a specificity of 67.1 %. Patients with a score < 3 had a lower probability of having SM compared to patients with a score ≥ 3 (28.5 % and 71.4 %, respectively, p < 0.0001). When sBT levels were corrected for the presence of hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HαT) using the BST calculater (https://bst-calculater.niaid.nih.gov/) recently published [1,2], the sensitivity of ΗαT-adjusted OSTEO-score increased to 87.8 %, and the specificity reached 76.1 %. Also, the positive predictive value of a score ≥ 3 increased to 85.2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to validate these results and characterize the role of tryptase genotyping in patients with unexplained osteoporosis in reducing the risk of misdiagnosing patients with SM. Our proposed scoring model allows the identification of patients with the highest probability of having SM, avoiding unnecessary BM studies.

SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Current and Emerging Therapies for Systemic Mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous myeloid neoplasm, characterized by clonal proliferation of mast cells (MCs) in ≥ 1 extracutaneous organs, including the bone marrow (BM) and gastrointestinal tract. Aberrant MC proliferation is driven by mutation KIT D816V in ≈90-95% of SM patients. Indolent SM (ISM) is the most common SM subtype with various symptoms that can be severe. Advanced SM (AdvSM) has markedly poor prognosis. The advent of KIT inhibitors, targeting mutant KIT and neoplastic MCs, led to a paradigm shift in SM management and markedly improved outcomes. Midostaurin inaugurated the era of KIT inhibitors and was approved for AdvSM in 2017. Avapritinib is the first highly potent and selective inhibitor of KIT D816V that was approved to treat AdvSM and symptomatic ISM (platelets ≥ 50 × 109/L), in the US, in 2021 and 2023, respectively. Pooled analysis of the EXPLORER and PATHFINDER studies, assessing avapritinib in AdvSM, demonstrated rapid and profound reductions (≥ 50%) in markers of MC burden, high response rates (71-75%), and prolonged survival. In the PIONEER study, avapritinib significantly and rapidly improved symptoms/quality of life, and reduced markers of MC burden in ISM patients. The investigational agents bezuclastinib and elenestinib are highly potent and selective inhibitors of KIT D816V with minimal blood-brain barrier penetration. Bezuclastinib reduced markers of MC burden by ≥ 50% in ≈50% of AdvSM patients and ≈90-100% of nonAdvSM patients and reduced symptoms (≥ 50%) in the APEX and SUMMIT studies, respectively. Elenestinib demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy in reducing MC burden markers and improved symptoms in ISM patients in the HARBOR study.

Tumor necrosis factor α promotes clonal dominance of KIT D816V+ cells in mastocytosis: role of survivin and impact on prognosis

ABSTRACT

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is defined by the expansion and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MCs) in the bone marrow (BM) and extracutaneous organs. Most patients harbor a somatic KIT D816V mutation, which leads to growth factor-independent KIT activation and accumulation of MC. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) is a proapoptotic and inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the clonal selection of neoplastic cells. We found that KIT D816V increases the expression and secretion of TNF. TNF expression in neoplastic MCs is reduced by KIT-targeting drugs. Similarly, knockdown of KIT or targeting the downstream signaling cascade of MAPK and NF-κB signaling reduced TNF expression levels. TNF reduces colony formation in human BM cells, whereas KIT D816V+ cells are less susceptible to the cytokine, potentially contributing to clonal selection. In line, knockout of TNF in neoplastic MC prolonged survival and reduced myelosuppression in a murine xenotransplantation model. Mechanistic studies revealed that the relative resistance of KIT D816V+ cells to TNF is mediated by the apoptosis-regulator BIRC5 (survivin). Expression of BIRC5 in neoplastic MC was confirmed by immunohistochemistry of samples from patients with SM. TNF serum levels are significantly elevated in patients with SM and high TNF levels were identified as a biomarker associated with inferior survival. We here characterized TNF as a KIT D816V-dependent cytokine that promotes clonal dominance. We propose TNF and apoptosis-associated proteins as potential therapeutic targets in SM.

Clinical impact of the TPSAB1 genotype in mast cell diseases: A REMA study in a cohort of 959 individuals

BACKGROUND

A close association between hereditary alpha-tryptasemia (HAT) and mast cell (MC) disorders has been previously reported. However, the relationship between HAT and the diagnostic subtypes and clinical features of MC disorders still remains to be established.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of HAT in healthy donors (HD) vs patients with different diagnostic subtypes of MC activation syndromes (MCAS) and mastocytosis, and its relationship with the clinical behavior of the disease.

METHODS

A total of 959 subjects were studied including 346 healthy donors (HD), 464 mastocytosis, and 149 non-clonal MCAS patients. Molecular studies to assess the TPSAB1 genotype were performed, and data on serum baseline tryptase (sBT) and basal MC-mediator release episodes and triggers of anaphylaxis were collected.

RESULTS

HAT was detected in 15/346 (4%) HD versus 43/149 (29%) non-clonal MCAS and 84/464 (18%) mastocytosis cases. Among mastocytosis, HAT was more frequently found in patients with MC-restricted KITD816V (21% vs. 10% among multilineage KITD816V patients; p = .008). Overall, median sBT was higher in cases presenting with HAT (28.9 vs. 24.5 ng/mL; p = .008), while no significant differences in sBT were observed among HAT+ mastocytosis patients depending on the presence of 1 vs. ≥2 extra copies of the α-tryptase gene (44.1 vs. 35.2 ng/mL, p > .05). In turn, anaphylaxis was more frequently observed in HAT+ versus HAT- mastocytosis patients (76% vs. 65%; p = .018), while HAT+ and HAT- patients who did not refer anaphylaxis as the presenting symptom (n = 308) showed a similar prevalence of subsequent anaphylaxis (35% vs. 36%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of HAT in MC disorders varies according to the diagnostic subtype of the disease. HAT does not imply a higher risk (and severity) of anaphylaxis in mastocytosis patients in whom anaphylaxis is not part of the presenting symptoms of the disease.

Predictors of Clonality and Underlying Mastocytosis in Mast Cell Activation Syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mast cell (MC) activation can present with a wide range of symptoms. The mechanisms that cause such activation are varied. One of them is the presence of clonal MCs which is defined, within other possible changes, by the presence of a somatic, activating mutation in the KIT gene. The clinical course and prognosis of patients with this underlying disease may be different from other causes of MC activation (MCA). For this reason, it is important to early diagnose, or at least suspect, which patients with MCA are due to clonal MCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of clonality must be made in a comprehensive manner. However, this paper reviews chronologically each of the stages from the patient's first visit to the doctor's office which can be indicative of clonality: clinical presentation of MCA, physical examination, analytical determinations of tryptase, and/or KIT mutational analysis and bone involvement, among others. The different clonality predictive scores proposed are also reviewed and compared. Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of certainty of MC clonality is the performance of a bone marrow (BM) biopsy, there are clinical symptoms, signs, and biological parameters suggestive of clonality, as well as predictive scores, which can guide (or rule out) an early diagnosis and avoid unnecessary BM biopsies.

Diagnostic Significance of Tryptase for Suspected Mast Cell Disorders

Tryptase has proven to be a very useful and specific marker to demonstrate mast cell activation and degranulation when an acute (i.e., within 4 h after the event) and baseline value (i.e., at least 24 h after the event) are compared and meet the consensus formula (i.e., an increase of 20% + 2). The upper limit of normal determined by the manufacturer is 11.4 ng/mL; however, this boundary has been the subject of debate. According to ECNM and AIM experts, the normal range of baseline tryptase should be 1 to 15 ng/mL. A genetic trait, hereditary alpha tryptasemia, characterized by an increased alpha coding TPSAB1 copy number is associated with a baseline value above 8 ng/mL. Elevated tryptase can also be found in chronic kidney disease, obesity, and hematological neoplasms. A tryptase > 20 ng/mL serves as a minor criterion to diagnose systemic mastocytosis and an increase in tryptase > 20% + 2 during an acute event is a required criterion in the diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome. The goal of this review is to demonstrate the (in)significance of tryptase using some clinical vignettes and to provide a practical guide on how to manage and interpret an elevated tryptase level.

An Unusual Transition from Cutaneous to Systemic Mastocytosis in a Pediatric Patient

Background: Cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) occurs when abnormal mast cells accumulate in the skin, whereas in systemic mastocytosis (SM), accumulation also occurs in other tissues. A transition from CM to SM is an atypical occurrence in pediatric patients. Case Presentation: An 8-month-old female presented with a 3-month history of whole body hyperpigmented macules with a normal serum tryptase level, consistent with a diagnosis of CM. At age 2.5 years, cutaneous lesions increased and repeat serum tryptase levels were elevated. Subsequent positive peripheral blood KIT D816V mutation testing furthered concern for a monoclonal mast cell disorder; therefore, prompting a bone marrow biopsy which was consistent with a diagnosis of SM. Conclusion: Our case depicts the possible transition from CM to SM in a pediatric patient. Despite an initial presentation consistent with a diagnosis of CM, watchful monitoring for signs and symptoms indicative of systemic involvement may be warranted in some pediatric patients.

Management of Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis and Associated Myeloid Neoplasms

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by neoplastic mast cell-related organ damage and frequently associated with a myeloid neoplasm. The 3 clinical entities that comprise AdvSM are aggressive SM (ASM), SM-associated hematologic neoplasm, and mast cell leukemia. A gain-of-function KIT D816 V mutation is the primary oncogenic driver found in about 90% of all patients with AdvSM. Midostaurin, an oral multikinase inhibitor with activity against KIT D816V, and avapritinib, an oral selective KIT D816V inhibitor are approved for AdvSM.

KIT Mutations and Other Genetic Defects in Mastocytosis: Implications for Disease Pathology and Targeted Therapies

A KIT activating mutation (usually KIT D816V) is detected in neoplastic cells in greater than 90% of indolent patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM). In more advanced variants of SM, additional genetic defects can be found in several myeloid malignancy-related genes, which can be detected by applying next-generation sequencing. Currently, the techniques recommended to detect the KIT D816V mutation and quantify the mutational burden in peripheral blood, bone marrow, or other organs/tissues are allele specific-quantitative PCR or droplet digital PCR. These techniques are useful for diagnosis, prognostication, follow-up and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive agents in patients with SM.

Assessment of Bone Microarchitecture in Patients with Systemic Mastocytosis and its Association with Clinical and Biochemical Parameters of the Disease

Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at high risk of bone deterioration. However, the evaluation of bone microarchitecture in this disease remains unclear. We aimed to assess bone microarchitecture in patients with SM. This was a cross-sectional study of 21 adult patients with SM conducted in a quaternary referral hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. A healthy, age-, weight-, and sex-matched cohort of 63 participants was used to provide reference values for bone microarchitecture, assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Total volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), cortical vBMD, and cortical thickness at the radius were significantly lower in the control group compared with the SM group (all P < 0.001). Patients with aggressive SM had significantly lower trabecular number (Tb.N) (P = 0.035) and estimated failure load (F.load) (P = 0.032) at the tibia compared with those with indolent SM. Handgrip strength was significantly higher in patients who had more Tb.N at the radius (ρ, 0.46; P = 0.036) and tibia (ρ, 0.49; P = 0.002), and lower who had more trabecular separation at the radius (ρ, -0.46; P = 0.035) and tibia (ρ, -0.52; P = 0.016). Strong and positive associations between F.load (ρ, 0.75; P < 0.001) and stiffness (ρ, 0.70; P < 0.001) at the radius, and between F.load at the tibia (ρ, 0.45; P = 0.038) were observed with handgrip strength. In this cross-sectional study, aggressive SM was more susceptible to bone deterioration compared with indolent SM. In addition, the findings demonstrated that handgrip strength was associated with bone microarchitecture and bone strength.

Highly Sensitive Enrichment of Low-Frequency Variants by Hairpin Competition Amplification

Gene mutations are inevitably accumulated in cells of the human body. It is of great significance to detect mutations at the earliest possible time in physiological and pathological processes. However, genotyping low-copy tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients is challenging due to abundant wild DNA backgrounds. One novel strategy to enrich rare mutations at low variant allele fractions (VAFs) with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Sanger sequencing was contrived by introducing artificial hairpins into amplicons to compete with primers, coined as the hairpin competition amplification (HCA) system. The influence imposed by artificial hairpins on primer-binding in a high-temperature PCR system was investigated for the first time in this work, paving the way for the optimization of HCA. HCA differs from the previously reported work in which hairpins are formed to inhibit extension of wild-type DNA using 5-exonuclease-negative polymerase, where the readout is dependent on melting curve analysis after asymmetric PCR. Targeted at six different variants, HCA qPCR and HCA Sanger-enriched mutant DNA at VAFs as low as 0.1 or 0.01% were performed. HCA demonstrated advantages in multiplex reaction and temperature robustness. In profiling gene status from 12 lung cancer ctDNA samples and 16 thyroid cancer FNA DNA samples, HCA demonstrated a 100% concordance rate compared to ddPCR and commercial ARMS kit. HCA qPCR and Sanger sequencing can enrich low-abundance variants with high sensitivity and temperature robustness, presenting a novel and effective tool for precision diagnosis and treatment of rare variant diseases.

Disease Spectrum of Anaphylaxis Disorders

Anaphylaxis results from massive mast cell activation. Mechanisms of mast cell activation may involve IgE- and non-IgE-mediated triggers, clonal mast cell disease, or be idiopathic and may be modified by several factors including but not restricted to hormonal status, stress, heritable factors, mast cell burden, and simultaneous exposure to more than 1 factor. Patients with recurrent anaphylaxis with a nonidentifiable trigger present a particular challenge in diagnosis and management. Presence of clonal disease may be suggested by hypotensive episodes with urticaria and angioedema, and high baseline tryptase levels. A number of scoring systems have been developed to identify patients who are at high risk to have underlying mastocytosis. This review provides an overview of anaphylaxis disorders and our current understanding of their mechanisms of action, evaluation, and management.

Clonal mast cell disorders and hereditary α-tryptasemia as risk factors for anaphylaxis

The association between Hymenoptera venom-triggered anaphylaxis (HVA) and clonal mast cell-related disorders (cMCD) has been known for decades. However, recent breakthroughs in peripheral blood screening for KIT p.D816V missense variant have revealed the true extent of this clinical association whilst adding to our understanding of the underlying aetiology. Thus, recent large studies highlighted the presence of KIT p.D816V among 18.2% and 23% of patients with severe Hymenoptera venom-triggered anaphylaxis. A significant proportion of those patients have normal serum basal tryptase (BST) levels, with no cutaneous findings such as urticaria pigmentosa or other systemic findings such as organomegaly that would have suggested the presence of cMCD. These findings of an increased prevalence suggest that the impact of cMCD on anaphylaxis could be clinically underestimated and that the leading question for clinicians could be changed from 'how many patients with cMCD have anaphylaxis?' to 'how many patients with anaphylaxis have cMCD?'. The discovery of hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT)-a genetic trait caused by an increased copy number of the Tryptase Alpha/Beta 1 (TPSAB1) gene-, first described in 2016, is now known to underlie the majority of cases of elevated BST outside of cMCD and chronic kidney disease. HαT is the first common heritable genetic modifier of anaphylaxis described, and it is associated with increased risk for severe HVA (relative risk = 2.0), idiopathic anaphylaxis, and an increased prevalence of anaphylaxis in patients with cMCD, possibly due to the unique activity profile of α/β -tryptase heterotetramers that may potentiate immediate hypersensitivity reaction severity. Our narrative review aims to highlight recent research to have increased our understanding of cMCD and HαT, through recent lessons learned from studying their association with HVA. Additionally, we examined the studies of mast cell-related disorders in food and drug allergy in an effort to determine whether one should also consider cMCD and/or HαT in cases of severe anaphylaxis triggered by food or drugs.

Avapritinib for advanced systemic mastocytosis

Avapritinib, a highly selective inhibitor of KIT D816V, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2021 for treatment of advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) and by the European Medicines Agency in 2022 for AdvSM after prior systemic therapy. The phase 1 EXPLORER and phase 2 PATHFINDER trials demonstrated that avapritinib can elicit complete and durable clinical responses and molecular remission of KIT D816V. Key management challenges relate to the complex mutational landscape of AdvSM, often found with an associated hematologic neoplasm.

Detection of clonal mast cell disease in wasp venom allergic patients with normal tryptase

Background

Clonal mast cell disease (CMD) is an underlying aggravating condition in wasp venom allergy (WVA) which requires a different treatment strategy. CMD is increasingly recognized in patients with normal basal serum tryptase (bsT). However, methods to identify at risk patients have not yet been assessed in large cohorts of WVA patients with normal bsT.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated the reliability of the REMA score in detecting CMD in a cohort of grade IV WVA patients with normal bsT and assessed the added value of other clinical parameters, KIT D816V mutation analysis in peripheral blood (PB) and the diagnosis of hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). All patients had a conclusive bone marrow evaluation that demonstrated or excluded underlying CMD.

Results

In total 35 CMD and 96 non‐CMD patients were included. REMA score had a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI 56%–88%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI 70%–87%) in this cohort. Loss of consciousness during systemic reaction and bsT between 6.3 and 11.4 ng/ml were additional parameters independently associated with CMD. Sensitivity of KIT in PB was relatively low, 56% (95% CI 36%–75%), but had added value as screening method in patients with a low REMA score due to 100% specificity.

Conclusion

The REMA score is a relatively reliable method to detect patients at risk of CMD among WVA patients with normal bsT. KIT mutation analysis in PB could serve as additional screening method in patients with low REMA scores.

Proposed European Competence Network on Mastocytosis-American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases (ECNM-AIM) Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis

Advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM) is characterized by the presence of KIT D816V and other somatic mutations (eg, in SRSF2, ASXL1, and RUNX1) in 95% and 60% to 70% of patients, respectively. The biological and clinical consequences of AdvSM include multilineage involvement (eg, associated hematologic neoplasm) in 60% to 80% of patients, variable infiltration and damage (C-findings) of predominantly bone marrow and visceral organs through affected mast cell (MC) and non-MC lineages, and elevated levels of serum tryptase. Recently, the treatment landscape has substantially changed with the introduction of the multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin and the selective KIT D816V inhibitor avapritinib. In this review, we discuss the evolution of AdvSM response criteria that have been developed to better capture clinical benefit (eg, improved responses and progression-free and overall survival). We propose refined response criteria from European Competence Network on Mastocytosis and American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases investigators that use a tiered approach to segregate the effects of histopathologic (eg, bone marrow MC burden, tryptase), molecular (eg, KIT D816V variant allele frequency), clinical (eg, C-findings), and symptom response on long-term outcomes. These response criteria require evaluation in future prospective clinical trials of selective KIT inhibitors and other novel agents.

Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases

An estimated 20-25% of the population is affected by chronic, non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases. Chronic skin inflammation has many causes. Among the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases are atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, urticaria, lichen planus, and hidradenitis suppurativa, driven by a complex interplay of genetics and environmental factors. Autoimmunity is another important cause of chronic skin inflammation. The autoimmune response may be mainly T cell driven, such as in alopecia areata or vitiligo, or B cell driven in chronic spontaneous urticaria, pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. Rare causes of chronic skin inflammation are autoinflammatory diseases, or rheumatic diseases, such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Whilst we have seen a significant improvement in diagnosis and treatment, several challenges remain. Especially for rarer causes of chronic skin inflammation, early diagnosis is often missed because of low awareness and lack of diagnostics. Systemic immunosuppression is the treatment of choice for almost all of these diseases. Adverse events due to immunosuppression, insufficient therapeutic responses and relapses remain a challenge. For atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, a broad spectrum of innovative treatments has been developed. However, treatment responses cannot be predicted so far. Hence, development of (bio)markers allowing selection of specific medications for individual patients is needed. Given the encouraging developments during the past years, we envision that many of these challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases will be thoroughly addressed in the future.

Standards of Genetic Testing in the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Systemic Mastocytosis in 2022: Recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group

Mastocytosis comprises rare heterogeneous diseases characterized by an increased accumulation of abnormal mast cells in various organs/tissues. The pathogenesis of mastocytosis is strongly linked to the presence of KIT-activating mutations. In systemic mastocytosis (SM), the most frequent mutation encountered is KIT p.D816V, whose presence constitutes one of the minor diagnostic criteria. Different techniques are used to search and quantify the KIT p.D816V mutant; however, allele-specific quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR are today the most sensitive. The analysis of the KIT p.D816V allele burden has undeniable interest for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring. The analysis of non-mast cell hematological compartments in SM is similarly important because KIT p.D816V multilineage involvement is associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, in advanced forms of SM, mutations in genes other than KIT are frequently identified and affect negatively disease outcome and response to therapy. Thus, combined quantitative and sensitive analysis of KIT mutations and next-generation sequencing of other recurrently involved myeloid genes make it possible to better characterize the extent of the affected cellular compartments and additional molecular aberrations, providing a more detailed overview of the complex mutational landscape of SM, in relation with the clinical heterogeneity of the disease. In this article, we report the latest recommendations of the EU-US Cooperative Group presented in September 2020 in Vienna during an international working conference, on the techniques we consider standard to detect and quantify the KIT p.D816V mutant in SM and additional myeloid mutations found in SM subtypes.

Systemic Mastocytosis: Multidisciplinary Approach

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that affect almost exclusively adults and are defined by the proliferation and accumulation of clonal mast cells (MC) in various tissues. Disease subtypes range from indolent to rare aggressive forms. Although SM is classified as a rare disease, it is believed to be likely underdiagnosed. Major signs and symptoms mainly depend on MC activation and less frequent organ infiltration, typical of more aggressive variants. Diagnosis may be challenging, and symptoms can be aspecific and involve several organs. Therefore, it is advisable to refer patients to specialized centers, having sufficient knowledge of the disease, sensitive diagnostic procedures, offering a personalized and multidisciplinary diagnostic approach, including at least hematological, allergological, dermatological, and rheumatological evaluations. A precise and timely diagnosis is required for: a) adequate counseling of patients and their physicians; b) beginning of symptomatic treatment (anti-mediator therapy); c) prevention of severe manifestations of the disease (i.e., recurrent anaphylaxis, osteoporosis, and bone fractures); d) cytoreductive treatment of advanced SM variants. This review summarizes the disease's main manifestations and describes the ideal diagnostic approach for adult patients with suspected SM, giving physicians the main notions for correct patient diagnosis and management. This review also highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in this very complex disease.

Avapritinib for Systemic Mastocytosis

INTRODUCTION

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare myeloid neoplasm driven in ≈95% of cases by activating KIT mutations, usually D816V. SM can be indolent (ISM), smoldering (SSM) and advanced (AdvSM), the latter characterized by organ damage resulting from infiltrating neoplastic mast cells. The vast majority of cases are indolent, with near-normal life expectancy, although symptoms can be severe. AdvSM, comprising aggressive SM, SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm and mast cell leukemia, however, carries a poor prognosis. Avapritinib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of mutant KIT.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of SM, including the current therapeutic landscape, and discuss avapritinib in detail: its chemistry and discovery, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data, current approval status and safety and efficacy profiles in both advanced and non-advanced SM.

EXPERT OPINION

With a response rate of 75% amongst evaluable patients with AdvSM and marked reductions observed in measures of mast cell and disease burden, avapritinib stands out as a highly effective targeted therapy for this mutant KIT-driven disease. Cognitive impairment may occur, and intracranial hemorrhage has been reported, particularly in association with severe thrombocytopenia. Early results in patients with ISM/SSM are encouraging. Avapritinib is now approved in the US for AdvSM.

Routine KIT p.D816V screening identifies clonal mast cell disease in patients with Hymenoptera allergy regularly missed using baseline tryptase levels alone

BACKGROUND

Clonal mast cell disorders and elevated basal serum tryptase (BST) levels with unknown cause(s) are associated with severe Hymenoptera venom-triggered anaphylaxis (HVA). However, some individuals with clonal disease have a normal BST level (<11.4 ng/mL).

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate whether screening for KIT p.D816V in the blood is a useful clinical tool to risk-stratify patients with venom allergy.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 374 patients with Hymenoptera allergy and no overt signs of mastocytosis who were referred to our center during the years 2018 and 2019. KIT p.D816V was determined in their peripheral blood by quantitative PCR, and tryptase genotyping was performed by droplet digital PCR.

RESULTS

In all, 351 patients (93.9%) had normal levels of BST, and KIT p.D816V was detected in 8% of patients (28 of 351), predominantly in patients with the most severe Mueller grade IV anaphylaxis (18.2% [24 of 132] vs 1.8% in patients with lower grades [4 of 88 with grade III and 0 of 131 with other grades]; P < .001). In grade IV patients with a normal BST level, KIT p.D816V was associated with more severe symptoms, including a significantly higher frequency of loss of consciousness (58.3% [14 of 24] vs 34.3% [37 of 108]; P = .03) and absence of skin symptoms (41.7% [10 of 24] vs 15.7% [17 of 108]; P = .004). Among patients with a normal BST level, KIT p.D816V (OR = 10.25 [95% CI = 3.75-36.14]; P < .0001) was the major risk factor associated with severe HVA. Hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) due to increased germline copies of TPSAB1 encoding α-tryptase was the most common cause (65.2% [15 of 23]) of elevated BST level in patients with HVA, and together with KIT p.D816V, it accounted for 90% of BST level elevations (20 of 23) in patients with HVA.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that routine KIT p.D816V screening identifies clonal disease in high-risk patients with HVA who are regularly missed when BST level is used alone.

PATHOGENIC AND DIAGNOSTIC RELEVANCE OF KIT IN PRIMARY MAST CELL ACTIVATION DISORDERS

OBJECTIVE

Mast cell (MC) activation (MCA) defines the mechanism by which certain patients suffer from symptoms due to the effect of a wide range of mediators released from MC upon their activation triggered by different stimuli. When these symptoms are severe and recurrent, the diagnosis of MCA syndrome (MCAS) might be considered. Here we review the relevant aspects related to the pathogenesis of MCAS, with special emphasis on the prevalence and diagnostic relevance of KIT mutations.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched between 1980 and 2021 using the following terms: Mast cell activation syndromes, mast cell activation, anaphylaxis, KIT mutations, KIT D816V, indolent systemic mastocytosis, bone marrow mastocytosis, cutaneous mastocytosis, IgE anaphylaxis and idiopathic anaphylaxis.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Only articles published in English were selected based on their relevance to MCAS and/or severe and recurrent anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

MCAS can be classified in clonal MCAS and non-clonal MCAS depending on the presence vs. absence of an underlying KIT mutation (mostly KIT D816V), respectively. In contrast to clonal MCAS in which MCA is associated with a primary MC disorder (i.e. primary MCAS) such as mastocytosis or monoclonal MCAS, non-clonal MCAS can be secondary to known or unidentified triggers (i.e. secondary and idiopathic MCAS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The clinical heterogeneity and complexity of the molecular assays needed for the study of MCAS patients might lead to misdiagnosis, particularly when patients are evaluated at non-specialized centers. Thus, referral of patients suffering from clinical manifestations suggestive of MCAS to Reference Centers on mastocytosis and MC diseases is strongly recommended.

Systemic Mastocytosis: Molecular Landscape and Implications for Treatment

Over the past decade, we have witnessed significant advances in the molecular characterization of systemic mastocytosis (SM). This has provided important information for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease but has also practically impacted the way we diagnose and manage it. Advances in molecular testing have run in parallel with advances in therapeutic targeting of constitutive active KIT, the major driver of the disease. Therefore, assessing the molecular landscape in each SM patient is essential for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring. This is facilitated by the routine availability of novel technologies like digital PCR and NGS. This review aims to summarize the pathogenesis of the disease, discuss the value of molecular diagnostic testing and how it should be performed, and provide an overview of present and future therapeutic concepts based on fine molecular characterization of SM patients.

Diagnosis of Primary Mast Cell Disorders in Anaphylaxis: Value of KIT D816V in Peripheral Blood

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is frequent in patients suffering from primary mast cell disorders (PMCDs). In patients without mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) and a baseline serum tryptase (bST) less than 30 ng/mL, the diagnosis of PMCD is challenging. In these patients, detection of the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood (PB) has been suggested as screening tool for a PMCD.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated whether KIT D816V in PB can contribute to the decision to perform a bone marrow (BM) biopsy in patients with anaphylaxis without MIS and a bST less than 30 ng/mL.

METHODS

We selected 74 patients with severe anaphylaxis without MIS and a bST less than 30 ng/mL. All underwent a BM biopsy. KIT D816V mutation was quantified in both PB and BM using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR).

RESULTS

Diagnosis of a PMCD was established in 40 patients (54%). Median bST for patients with and without PMCD was, respectively, 9.5 ng/mL (range 4.2-27 ng/mL) and 4.9 ng/mL (range 2.2-20.3 ng/mL) (P <.001). KIT D816V in PB was detected in 16 out of 40 (40%) patients with PMCD. KIT D816V in BM was detected in 22 out of 40 (55%) patients with PMCD.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without MIS and a bST less than < 30 ng/mL who experience anaphylaxis, determination of KIT D816V mutation in PB is of limited help in deciding when to proceed to a BM biopsy. Therefore, KIT D816V in PB mutation analysis should be interpreted together with scoring tools to make a better assessment in identifying patients who should undergo BM biopsy.

Hereditary α tryptasemia is a valid genetic biomarker for severe mediator-related symptoms in mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by expansion of KIT D816V-mutated clonal mast cells in various organs and severe or even life-threatening anaphylactic reactions. Recently, hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) has been described as a common genetic trait with increased copy numbers of the α-tryptase encoding gene, TPSAB1, and associated with an increased basal serum tryptase level and a risk of mast cell activation. The purpose of our study was to elucidate the clinical relevance of HαT in patients with mastocytosis. TPSAB1 germline copy number variants were assessed by digital polymerase chain reaction in 180 mastocytosis patients, 180 sex-matched control subjects, 720 patients with other myeloid neoplasms, and 61 additional mastocytosis patients of an independent validation cohort. α-Tryptase encoding TPSAB1 copy number gains, compatible with HαT, were identified in 17.2% of mastocytosis patients and 4.4% of the control population (P < .001). Patients with HαT exhibited higher tryptase levels than patients without HαT (median tryptase in HαT+ cases: 49.6 ng/mL vs HαT- cases: 34.5 ng/mL, P = .004) independent of the mast cell burden. Hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity reactions and severe cardiovascular mediator-related symptoms/anaphylaxis were by far more frequently observed in mastocytosis patients with HαT than in those without HαT. Results were confirmed in an independent validation cohort. The high prevalence of HαT in mastocytosis hints at a potential pathogenic role of germline α-tryptase encoding TPSAB1 copy number gains in disease evolution. Together, our data suggest that HαT is a novel emerging robust biomarker in mastocytosis that is useful for determining the individual patient´s risk of developing severe anaphylaxis.

Adverse Prognostic Impact of the KIT D816V Transcriptional Activity in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis

In systemic mastocytosis (SM), qualitative and serial quantitative assessment of the KIT D816V mutation is of diagnostic and prognostic relevance. We investigated peripheral blood and bone marrow samples of 161 patients (indolent SM (ISM), n = 40; advanced SM, AdvSM, n = 121) at referral and during follow-up for the KIT D816V variant allele frequency (VAF) at the DNA-level and the KIT D816V expressed allele burden (EAB) at the RNA-level. A round robin test with four participating laboratories revealed an excellent correlation (r > 0.99, R² > 0.98) between three different DNA-assays. VAF and EAB strongly correlated in ISM (r = 0.91, coefficient of determination, R² = 0.84) but only to a lesser extent in AdvSM (r = 0.71; R² = 0.5). However, as compared to an EAB/VAF ratio ≤2 (cohort A, 77/121 patients, 64%) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified an EAB/VAF ratio of >2 (cohort B, 44/121 patients, 36%) as predictive for an advanced phenotype and a significantly inferior median survival (3.3 vs. 11.7 years; p = 0.005). In terms of overall survival, Cox-regression analysis was only significant for the EAB/VAF ratio >2 (p = 0.006) but not for VAF or EAB individually. This study demonstrates for the first time that the transcriptional activity of KIT D816V may play an important role in the pathophysiology of SM.

Genetic Regulation of Tryptase Production and Clinical Impact: Hereditary Alpha Tryptasemia, Mastocytosis and Beyond

Tryptase is a serine protease that is predominantly produced by tissue mast cells (MCs) and stored in secretory granules together with other pre-formed mediators. MC activation, degranulation and mediator release contribute to various immunological processes, but also to several specific diseases, such as IgE-dependent allergies and clonal MC disorders. Biologically active tryptase tetramers primarily derive from the two genes TPSB2 (encoding β-tryptase) and TPSAB1 (encoding either α- or β-tryptase). Based on the most common gene copy numbers, three genotypes, 0α:4β, 1α:3β and 2α:2β, were defined as “canonical”. About 4–6% of the general population carry germline TPSAB1-α copy number gains (2α:3β, 3α:2β or more α-extra-copies), resulting in elevated basal serum tryptase levels. This condition has recently been termed hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HαT). Although many carriers of HαT appear to be asymptomatic, a number of more or less specific symptoms have been associated with HαT. Recent studies have revealed a significantly higher HαT prevalence in patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) and an association with concomitant severe Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis. Moreover, HαT seems to be more common in idiopathic anaphylaxis and MC activation syndromes (MCAS). Therefore, TPSAB1 genotyping should be included in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with symptomatic SM, severe anaphylaxis or MCAS.

Mastocytosis

OBJECTIVES

The 2019 Workshop of the Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology received and reviewed cases covering the spectrum of mastocytosis and related diseases, including morphologic mimics, focusing on recent updates and relevant findings for pathologists.

METHODS

The workshop panel reviewed 99 cases of cutaneous and systemic mastocytosis (SM) and SM and associated hematologic neoplasms (SM-AHN).

RESULTS

Despite a common theme of KIT mutation (particularly D816V), mastocytosis is a heterogeneous neoplasm with a wide variety of presentations. This spectrum, including rare subtypes and extramedullary organ involvement, is discussed and illustrated by representative cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In the age of targeted treatment aimed at KIT, the accurate diagnosis and classification of mastocytosis has major implications for therapy and further interventions. Understanding the clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings of mastocytosis is crucial for selecting the proper tests to perform and subsequent arrival at a correct diagnosis in this rare disease.

Laboratory Tests in Diagnosis of Mastocytosis: Literature Review and Case Report

Мastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by abnormal growth and accumulation of mast cells (MCs) in the skin and/or other organ systems. Mastocytosis is a rare disease. The annual incidence is 5-10 cases per 1 million people. However, the majority of cases stay undiagnosed due to the lack of specific tests and a wide variety of clinical features of the disease. In mastocytosis, somatic mutations of KIT gene lead to autocrine dysregulation and constitutive c-KIT activation in the absence of its ligand SCF. Clinical symptoms of the disease are determined by MC mediator release and/or infiltration of tissues by MCs. According to the World Health Organisation classification updated in 2016 mastocytosis is divided to cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), smoldering systemic mastocytosis (SSM), SM with an associated hematologic (non-MC-lineage) neoplasm (SMAHN), aggressive SM (ASM), MC leukemia (MCL) and MC sarcoma (MCS). The CM and ISM prognosis is excellent with (almost) normal life expectancy, unlike aggressive forms (ASM and MCL) with poor prognosis. In this paper the key aspects of clinical features and diagnostic criteria of mastocytosis are discussed. We present a case report of a patient with mastocytosis in the skin following psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy with good response.

Heritable risk for severe anaphylaxis associated with increased α-tryptase-encoding germline copy number at TPSAB1

BACKGROUND

An elevated basal serum tryptase level is associated with severe systemic anaphylaxis, most notably caused by Hymenoptera envenomation. Although clonal mast cell disease is the culprit in some individuals, it does not fully explain this clinical association.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine the prevalence and associated impact of tryptase genotypes on anaphylaxis in humans.

METHODS

Cohorts with systemic mastocytosis (SM) and venom as well as idiopathic anaphylaxis from referral centers in Italy, Slovenia, and the United States, underwent tryptase genotyping by droplet digital PCR. Associated anaphylaxis severity (Mueller scale) was subsequently examined. Healthy volunteers and controls with nonatopic disease were recruited and tryptase was genotyped by droplet digital PCR and in silico analysis of genome sequence, respectively. The effects of pooled and recombinant human tryptases, protease activated receptor 2 agonist and antagonist peptides, and a tryptase-neutralizing mAb on human umbilical vein endothelial cell permeability were assayed using a Transwell system.

RESULTS

Hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT)-a genetic trait caused by increased α-tryptase-encoding Tryptase-α/β1 (TPSAB1) copy number resulting in elevated BST level-was common in healthy individuals (5.6% [n = 7 of 125]) and controls with nonatopic disease (5.3% [n = 21 of 398]). HαT was associated with grade IV venom anaphylaxis (relative risk = 2.0; P < .05) and more prevalent in both idiopathic anaphylaxis (n = 8 of 47; [17%; P = .006]) and SM (n = 10 of 82 [12.2%; P = .03]) relative to the controls. Among patients with SM, concomitant HαT was associated with increased risk for systemic anaphylaxis (relative risk = 9.5; P = .007). In vitro, protease-activated receptor-2-dependent vascular permeability was induced by pooled mature tryptases but not α- or β-tryptase homotetramers.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk for severe anaphylaxis in humans is associated with inherited differences in α-tryptase-encoding copies at TPSAB1.

Recent Advances in the Molecular Biology of Systemic Mastocytosis: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy

In recent years, molecular characterization and management of patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) have greatly benefited from the application of advanced technologies. Highly sensitive and accurate assays for KIT D816V mutation detection and quantification have allowed the switch to non-invasive peripheral blood testing for patient screening; allele burden has prognostic implications and may be used to monitor therapeutic efficacy. Progress in genetic profiling of KIT, together with the use of next-generation sequencing panels for the characterization of associated gene mutations, have allowed the stratification of patients into three subgroups differing in terms of pathogenesis and prognosis: i) patients with mast cell-restricted KIT D816V; ii) patients with multilineage KIT D816V-involvement; iii) patients with "multi-mutated disease". Thanks to these findings, new prognostic scoring systems combining clinical and molecular data have been developed. Finally, non-genetic SETD2 histone methyltransferase loss of function has recently been identified in advanced SM. Assessment of SETD2 protein levels and activity might provide prognostic information and has opened new research avenues exploring alternative targeted therapeutic strategies. This review discusses how progress in recent years has rapidly complemented previous knowledge improving the molecular characterization of SM, and how this has the potential to impact on patient diagnosis and management.

Importance of Adequate Diagnostic Workup for Correct Diagnosis of Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate epidemiologic features and diagnostic pitfalls of advSM in Germany.

METHODS

Therefore, 140 patients from a single German reference center of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis between 2003 and 2018 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients' median age was 68 years (range, 26-86 years), and male versus female ratio was 2:1. An elevated serum tryptase, a KIT D816 mutation, and additional somatic mutations, for example, in SRSF2, ASXL1, or RUNX1, were identified in 95%, 91%, and 74% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 3.5 years (range, 0.03-14.3 years; male vs female 2.6 vs 4.2 years; P = .02). Two categories of misdiagnoses were identified in 51 of 140 (36%) patients: First, systemic mastocytosis (SM) was overlooked in 28 of 140 (20%) patients primarily diagnosed with various subtypes of myeloid neoplasms. Second, 23 of 140 (16%) patients were diagnosed with supposed progression from indolent SM to advSM; however, combination of an elevated KIT D816V variant allele frequency in peripheral blood (n = 22), monocytosis (n = 9), eosinophilia (n = 6), and/or mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1, or RUNX1 (n = 10) suggest that distinct signs of potential advSM were overlooked in virtually all patients. Based on locally diagnosed patients in an area of 2.5 million inhabitants, but obviously without considering more, yet unrecognized cases, the incidence and prevalence of advSM is at least 0.8 and 5.2, respectively, per 1 million inhabitants.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate analyses of tryptase levels, bone marrow morphology, and genetics in patients with myeloid neoplasms or SM would help to prevent the significant underdiagnosis of advSM.

New developments in diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of advanced systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) has greatly benefited from the broad application of precision medicine techniques to hematolymphoid neoplasms. Sensitive detection of the recurrent KIT D816V mutation and use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels to profile the genetic landscape of SM variants have been critical adjuncts to the diagnosis and subclassification of SM, and development of clinical-molecular prognostic scoring systems. Multilineage KIT involvement and multimutated clones are characteristic of advanced SM (advSM), especially SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (AHN). A major challenge is how to integrate conventional markers of mast cell disease burden (percentage of bone marrow mast cell infiltration and serum tryptase levels) with molecular data (serial monitoring of both KIT D816V variant allele frequency and NGS panels) to lend more diagnostic and prognostic clarity to the heterogeneous clinical presentations and natural histories of advSM. The approval of the multikinase/KIT inhibitor midostaurin has validated the paradigm of KIT inhibition in advSM, and the efficacy and safety of second-generation agents, such as the switch-control inhibitor ripretinib (DCC-2618) and the D816V-selective inhibitor avapritinib (BLU-285) are being further defined in ongoing clinical trials. Looking forward, perhaps the most fruitful marriage of the advances in molecular genetics and treatment will be the design of adaptive basket trials that combine histopathology and genetic profiling to individualize treatment approaches for patients with diverse AHNs and relapsed/refractory SM.

Molecular quantification of tissue disease burden is a new biomarker and independent predictor of survival in mastocytosis

A high allele burden of the KIT D816V mutation in peripheral blood or bone marrow aspirates indicates multi-lineage hematopoietic involvement and has been associated with an aggressive clinical course of systemic mastocytosis. Since mast cells are substantially underrepresented in these liquid specimens, their mutation burden likely underestimates the tumor burden of the disease. We used a novel previously validated digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for KIT D816V analysis to systematically analyze the mutation burden in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow tissue sections of 116 mastocytosis patients (91 with indolent and 25 with advanced systemic mastocytosis), and to evaluate for the first time the clinical value of the tissue mutation burden as a novel biomarker. The KIT D816V mutation burden in the tissue was significantly higher and correlated better with bone marrow mast cell infiltration (r=0.68 vs. 0.48) and serum tryptase levels (r=0.68 vs. 0.58) compared to that in liquid specimens. Furthermore, the KIT D816V tissue mutation burden was: (i) significantly higher in advanced than in indolent systemic mastocytosis (P=0.001); (ii) predicted survival of patients in multivariate analyses independently; and (iii) was significantly reduced after response to cytoreductive therapy. Finally, digital PCR was more sensitive in detecting KIT D816V in bone marrow sections of indolent systemic mastocytosis patients than melting curve analysis after peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping (97% vs. 89%; P<0.05). In summary, digital PCR-based measurement of KIT D816V mutation burden in the tissue represents a novel biomarker with independent prognostic significance that can also be employed for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in systemic mastocytosis.

Digital PCR—An Emerging Technology with Broad Applications in Microbiology

BACKGROUND

The PCR and its variant, quantitative PCR (qPCR), have revolutionized the practice of clinical microbiology. Continued advancements in PCR have led to a new derivative, digital PCR (dPCR), which promises to address certain limitations inherent to qPCR.

CONTENT

Here we highlight the important technical differences between qPCR and dPCR, and the potential advantages and disadvantages of each. We then review specific situations in which dPCR has been implemented in clinical microbiology and the results of such applications. Finally, we attempt to place dPCR in the context of other emerging technologies relevant to the clinical laboratory, including next-generation sequencing.

SUMMARY

dPCR offers certain clear advantages over traditional qPCR, but these are to some degree offset by limitations of the technology, at least as currently practiced. Laboratories considering implementation of dPCR should carefully weigh the potential advantages and disadvantages of this powerful technique for each specific application planned.