1
|
Esperto F, Prata F, Antonelli A, Alloni R, Campanozzi L, Cataldo R, Civitella A, Fiori C, Ghilardi G, Guglielmelli E, Minervini A, Muto G, Rocco B, Sighinolfi C, Pang KH, Simone G, Tambone V, Tuzzolo P, Scarpa RM, Papalia R. Bioethical implications of robotic surgery in urology: a narrative review. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:700-710. [PMID: 34308607 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04240-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic technologies are being increasingly implemented in healthcare, including urology, holding promises for improving medicine worldwide. However, these new approaches raise ethical concerns for professionals, patients, researchers and institutions that need to be addressed. The aim of this review is to investigate the existing literature related to bioethical issues associated with robotic surgery in urology, in order to identify current challenges and make preliminary suggestions to ensure an ethical implementation of these technologies. METHODS We performed a narrative review of the pertaining literature through a systematic search of two databases (PubMed and Web of Science) in August 2020. RESULTS Our search yielded 76 articles for full-text evaluation and 48 articles were included in the narrative review. Several bioethical issues were identified and can be categorized into five main subjects: 1) robotic surgery accessibility; 2) safety; 3) gender gap; 4) costs and 5) learning curve. 1) Robotic surgery is expensive, and in some health systems may lead to inequality in healthcare access. In more affluent countries the national distribution of several robotic platforms may influence the centralization of robotic surgery, therefore potentially affecting oncological and functional outcomes in low-volume centers. 2) There is a considerable gap between surgical skills and patients' perception of competence, leading to ethical consequences on modern healthcare. Published incidence of adverse events during robotic surgery in large series is between 2% and 15%, which does not significantly differ amongst open or laparoscopic approaches. 3) No data about gap differences in accessibility to robotic platforms were retrieved from our search. 4) Robotic platforms are expensive but a key reason why hospitals are willing to absorb the high upfront costs is patient demand. It is possible to achieve cost-equivalence between open and robotic prostatectomy if the volume of centers is higher than 10 cases per week. 5) A validated, structured curriculum and accreditation has been created for robotic surgery. This allows acquisition and development of basic and complex robotic skills focusing on patient safety and short learning curve. CONCLUSIONS Tech-medicine is rapidly moving forward. Robotic approach to urology seems to be accessible in more affluent countries, safe, economically sustainable, and easy to learn with an appropriate learning curve for both sex. It is mandatory to keep maintaining a critical rational approach with constant control of the available evidence regarding efficacy, efficiency and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Esperto
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy -
| | - Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Rossana Alloni
- Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Campanozzi
- Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Practice, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rita Cataldo
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Section, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Civitella
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Ghilardi
- Institute of Philosophy of Scientific and Technological Practice, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Eugenio Guglielmelli
- Laboratory of Biomedical Robotics and Biomicrosystems, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Muto
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Gradenigo University, Turin, Italy
| | - Bernardo Rocco
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Chiara Sighinolfi
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Karl H Pang
- Academic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah AA, Bandari J, Pelzman D, Davies BJ, Jacobs BL. Diffusion and adoption of the surgical robot in urology. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2151-2157. [PMID: 34159097 PMCID: PMC8185660 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.11.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, robotic surgery has become a mainstay in hospital systems around the world. Leading this charge has been Intuitive Surgical Inc.’s da Vinci robotic system (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Through its innovative technology and unique revenue model, Intuitive has installed 4,986 robotic surgical systems worldwide in the last two decades. The rapid rate of adoption and diffusion of the surgical robot has been propelled by many important industry-specific factors. In this review, we propose a model that explains the successful adoption of robotic surgery due to its three core groups: the surgeon, the hospital administrator, and the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup A Shah
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jathin Bandari
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel Pelzman
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin J Davies
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bruce L Jacobs
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Omil-Lima DO, Gupta K, Calaway AC, Zell MA. Historical Considerations and Surgical Quality Improvement in Robotic Prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2020; 48:35-44. [PMID: 33218592 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic prostatectomy was technically challenging and not widely adopted. Robotics led to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive prostatectomy, which has been used heavily, supplanting the open and traditional laparoscopic approach. The benefits of robotic prostatectomy are disputed. Data suggest that robotic prostatectomy outcomes have improved over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danly O Omil-Lima
- Urology Institute, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| | - Karishma Gupta
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Adam C Calaway
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Zell
- Urology Institute-University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pucheril D, Fletcher SA, Chen X, Friedlander DF, Cole AP, Krimphove MJ, Fields AC, Melnitchouk N, Kibel AS, Dasgupta P, Trinh QD. Workplace absenteeism amongst patients undergoing open vs. robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, and partial colectomy. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1644-1650. [PMID: 32291540 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07547-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is controversy regarding the widespread uptake of robotic surgery across several surgical disciplines. While it has been shown to confer clinical benefits such as decreased blood loss and shorter hospital stays, some argue that the benefits of this technology do not outweigh its high cost. We performed a retrospective insurance-based analysis to investigate how undergoing robotic surgery, compared to open surgery, may impact the time in which an employed individual returns to work after undergoing major surgery. METHODS We identified a cohort of US adults with employer-sponsored insurance using claims data from the MarketScan database who underwent either open or robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy/myomectomy, and partial colectomy from 2012 to 2016. We performed multiple regression models incorporating propensity scores to assess the effect of robotic vs. open surgery on the number of absent days from work, adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline absenteeism. RESULTS In a cohort of 1157 individuals with employer-sponsored insurance, those undergoing open surgery, compared to robotic surgery, had 9.9 more absent workdays for radical prostatectomy (95%CI 5.0 to 14.7, p < 0.001), 25.3 for hysterectomy/myomectomy (95%CI 11.0-39.6, p < 0.001), and 29.8 for partial colectomy (95%CI 14.8-44.8, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: For the three major procedures studied, robotic surgery was associated with fewer missed days from work compared to open surgery. This information helps payers, patients, and providers better understand some of the indirect benefits of robotic surgery relative to its cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pucheril
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sean A Fletcher
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA
| | - Xi Chen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David F Friedlander
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marieke J Krimphove
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Adam C Fields
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, King's College, London, UK
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nabi J, Friedlander DF, Chen X, Cole AP, Hu JC, Kibel AS, Dasgupta P, Trinh QD. Assessment of Out-of-Pocket Costs for Robotic Cancer Surgery in US Adults. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e1919185. [PMID: 31940036 PMCID: PMC6991257 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Expensive technologies-including robotic surgery-experience rapid adoption without evidence of superior outcomes. Although previous studies have examined perioperative outcomes and costs, differences in out-of-pocket costs for patients undergoing robotic surgery are not well understood. OBJECTIVE To assess out-of-pocket costs and total payments for 5 types of common oncologic procedures that can be performed using an open or robotic approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, cross-sectional, propensity score-weighted analysis was performed using deidentified insurance claims for 1.9 million enrollees from the MarketScan database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. The final study sample comprised 15 893 US adults aged 18 to 64 years who were enrolled in an employer-sponsored health plan. Patients underwent either an open or robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, partial colectomy, radical nephrectomy, or partial nephrectomy for a solid-organ malignant neoplasm. Statistical analysis was performed from December 18, 2018, to June 5, 2019. EXPOSURES Type of surgical procedure-robotic vs open. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome of interest was out-of-pocket costs associated with robotic and open surgery. The secondary outcome of interest was associated total payments. RESULTS Among 15 893 patients (11 102 men; mean [SD] age, 55.4 [6.6] years), 8260 underwent robotic and 7633 underwent open procedures; patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy were older than those undergoing open hysterectomy (mean [SD] age, 55.7 [6.7] vs 54.6 [7.2] years), and patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy had more comorbidities than those undergoing robotic radical nephrectomy (≥2 comorbidities, 658 of 861 [76.4%] vs 244 of 347 [70.3%]). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all procedures: -$137.75 (95% CI, -$240.24 to -$38.63) for radical prostatectomy (P = .006); -$640.63 (95% CI, -$933.62 to -$368.79) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$1140.54 (95% CI, -$1397.79 to -$896.54) for partial colectomy (P < .001); -$728.32 (95% CI, -$1126.90 to -$366.08) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$302.74 (95% CI, -$523.14 to -$97.10) for partial nephrectomy (P = .003). The robotic approach was similarly associated with lower adjusted total payments: -$3872.62 (95% CI, -$5385.49 to -$2399.04) for radical prostatectomy (P < .001); -$29 640.69 (95% CI, -$36 243.82 to -$23 465.94) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$38 151.74 (95% CI, -$46 386.16 to -$30 346.22) for partial colectomy; (P < .001); -$33 394.15 (95% CI, -$42 603.03 to -$24 955.20) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$9162.52 (95% CI, -$12 728.33 to -$5781.99) for partial nephrectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found significant variation in perioperative costs according to surgical technique for both patients (out-of-pocket costs) and payers (total payments); the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all studied oncologic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junaid Nabi
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David F. Friedlander
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xi Chen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander P. Cole
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Manufacturers, companies, and health care professionals and organizations use an array of promotional activities to sell and increase market share of their products and services. These activities seek to shape public and clinician beliefs about laboratory testing, the benefits and harms of prescription drugs, and some disease definitions. OBJECTIVE To review the marketing of prescription drugs, disease awareness campaigns, health services, and laboratory tests and the related consequences and regulation in the United States over a 20-year period (1997-2016). EVIDENCE Analysis (1997-2016) of consumer advertising (Kantar Media data for spending and number of ads); professional marketing (IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, Open Payments Data [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services]); regulations and legal actions of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), state attorneys general, and US Department of Justice; and searches (1975-2018) of peer-reviewed medical literature (PubMed), business journals (Business Source Ultimate), and news media (Lexis Nexis) for articles about expenditures, content, and consequences and regulation of consumer and professional medical marketing. Spending is reported in 2016 dollars. FINDINGS From 1997 through 2016, spending on medical marketing of drugs, disease awareness campaigns, health services, and laboratory testing increased from $17.7 to $29.9 billion. The most rapid increase was in direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising, which increased from $2.1 billion (11.9%) of total spending in 1997 to $9.6 billion (32.0%) of total spending in 2016. DTC prescription drug advertising increased from $1.3 billion (79 000 ads) to $6 billion (4.6 million ads [including 663 000 TV commercials]), with a shift toward advertising high-cost biologics and cancer immunotherapies. Pharmaceutical companies increased DTC marketing about diseases treated by their drugs with increases in disease awareness campaigns from 44 to 401 and in spending from $177 million to $430 million. DTC advertising for health services increased from $542 million to $2.9 billion, with the largest spending increases by hospitals, dental centers, cancer centers, mental health and addiction clinics, and medical services (eg, home health). DTC spending on advertising for laboratory tests (such as genetic testing) increased from $75.4 million to $82.6 million, although the number of ads increased more substantially (from 14 100 to 255 300), reflecting an increase in less expensive electronic media advertising. Marketing to health care professionals by pharmaceutical companies accounted for most promotional spending and increased from $15.6 billion to $20.3 billion, including $5.6 billion for prescriber detailing, $13.5 billion for free samples, $979 million for direct physician payments (eg, speaking fees, meals) related to specific drugs, and $59 million for disease education. Manufacturers of FDA-approved laboratory tests paid $12.9 million to professionals in 2016. From 1997 through 2016, the number of consumer and professional drug promotional materials that companies submitted for FDA review increased from 34 182 to 97 252, while FDA violation letters for misleading drug marketing decreased from 156 to 11. Since 1997, 103 financial settlements between drug companies and federal and state governments resulted in more than $11 billion in fines for off-label or deceptive marketing practices. The FTC has acted against misleading marketing by a single for-profit cancer center. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Medical marketing increased substantially from 1997 through 2016, especially DTC advertising for prescription drugs and health services. Pharmaceutical marketing to health professionals accounted for most spending and remains high even with new policies to limit industry influence. Despite the increase in marketing over 20 years, regulatory oversight remains limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Schwartz
- The Center for Medicine in the Media, Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Steven Woloshin
- The Center for Medicine in the Media, Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Sponsoring surgeons: An investigation on the influence of the da Vinci robot. Am J Surg 2018; 216:84-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
9
|
Cooperberg MR. How Should a Man with Prostate Cancer Choose his Surgeon? Eur Urol 2018; 73:826-827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
Promotion and marketing of bioidentical hormone therapy on the internet: a content analysis of websites. Menopause 2018; 24:1129-1135. [PMID: 28609391 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the quality of information presented and claims made on websites offering bioidentical hormone therapy (BHT) products or services. METHODS A quantitative content analysis was completed on 100 websites promoting or offering BHT products or services. Websites were identified through Google search engine from September to October 2013. Search terms included "bioidentical hormone therapy" or "bioidentical progesterone," accompanied by "purchase or buy," "service," or "doctors." The Brief DISCERN instrument was used to determine the quality of the health information. RESULTS Websites were from Canada (59%), United States (38%), and other countries (3%). Almost half of the websites originated from medical clinics (47%), and healthcare professionals offering BHT services included physicians (50%), pharmacists (19%), and naturopaths (16%). Majority of websites promoted BHT as custom-compounded formulations (62%), with only 27% indicating that BHT is also commercially available. Websites overall claimed that BHT had less risk compared with conventional hormone therapy (62%). BHT was described as having less breast cancer risk (40%), whereas over a quarter of websites described BHT as "protective" for breast cancer. Websites mainly targeted women (99%), with males mentioned in 62% of websites. Product descriptors used to promote BHT included individualization (77%), natural (70%), hormone imbalance (56%), and antiaging (50%). The mean Brief DISCERN score was 15, indicating lower quality of information. CONCLUSIONS Claims made about BHT on the internet are misleading and not consistent with current professional organizations' recommendations. Understanding how BHT may be promoted on the internet can help healthcare professionals when educating patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Klara K, Kim J, Ross JS. Direct-to-Consumer Broadcast Advertisements for Pharmaceuticals: Off-Label Promotion and Adherence to FDA Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33:651-658. [PMID: 29484575 PMCID: PMC5910340 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4274-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertisements for prescription drugs in the United States are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Off-label promotion, or the advertisement of a drug for an indication not approved by the FDA, is prohibited. Our objective was to examine the presence of off-label promotion in broadcast DTC ads and to assess their adherence to FDA guidelines mandating fair balance in presentation of risks and benefits and prohibiting misleading advertisement claims. METHODS All English-language broadcast DTC ads for prescription drugs that aired in the United States from January 2015 to July 2016 were obtained from AdPharm, an online collection of healthcare advertisements. Ad length was measured and adherence to FDA guidelines was assessed for several categories: key regulatory items, indicators of false or misleading ads, and indicators of fair balance in presentation of risks and benefits. RESULTS Our sample included 97 unique DTC ads, representing 60 unique drugs and 67 unique drug-indication combinations. No ads described drug risks quantitatively, whereas drug efficacy was presented quantitatively in 25 (26%) ads. Thirteen (13%) ads, all for diabetes medications, suggested off-label uses for weight loss and blood pressure reduction. The most commonly advertised drugs were indicated for the treatment of inflammatory conditions (n = 12; 18%), diabetes or diabetic neuropathy (n = 11; 16%), bowel or bladder dysfunction (n = 6; 9%), and infections or allergic reaction (n = 6; 9%). More than three-quarters (n = 51; 76%) advertised drugs to treat chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS Few broadcast DTC ads were fully compliant with FDA guidelines. The overall quality of information provided in ads was low, and suggestions of off-label promotion were common for diabetes medications. The impact of current DTC ads and off-label marketing on patient and prescriber decisions merits further scrutiny.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeanie Kim
- Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, USA
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) at Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) at Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Section of General Internal Medicine and the National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu W, Patil D, Howard DH, Moore RH, Wang H, Sanda MG, Filson CP. Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States. Urology 2018; 117:57-63. [PMID: 29679601 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess adoption of prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the United States and to evaluate factors associated with magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy (MRI-Bx) use. Prior reports have shown improved cancer detection with MRI-Bx vs transrectal ultrasound-guided methods (transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy [TRUS-Bx]). Population-based trends of their use and outcomes have not been previously characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using private insurance claims (2009-2015), we identified men who underwent prostate biopsy. Exposures were biopsy year and geographic region defined by metropolitan statistical area. Outcomes included biopsy type (MRI-Bx, TRUS-Bx, or transperineal biopsy) based on procedure codes and cancer detection based on a new diagnosis for prostate cancer (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] 185). Hierarchical mixed-effects multivariable regression estimated odds of undergoing MRI-Bx. RESULTS We identified 241,681 men (mean age 57.5 ± 5.4 years) who underwent biopsy. The use of MRI-Bx rose rapidly (0.2% in 2009 to 6.5% in 2015, P <.001). Overall, 3429 men underwent MRI before biopsy, more commonly in metropolitan statistical areas (odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.66-2.19). In 2015, nearly 18% of men with prior negative biopsy underwent a prebiopsy MRI. Patients with prior negative biopsies were over 4 times more likely to use MRI guidance (vs no prior biopsies, odds ratio 4.63, 95% confidence interval 4.27-5.02) and had a greater chance of cancer detection with MRI-Bx (25.2%) vs TRUS-Bx (19.7%, P = .010). CONCLUSION Among men undergoing prostate biopsy, prebiopsy prostate MRI utilization was concentrated within urban areas and among patients with prior negative biopsies, where its use was associated with superior cancer detection compared with traditional TRUS-Bx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Liu
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Dattatraya Patil
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - David H Howard
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Renee H Moore
- Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Heqiong Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Martin G Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Christopher P Filson
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Decatur, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Finding the Value of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2018; 60:223-230. [PMID: 28121645 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is indistinctly defined and some cases possess clinical outcomes that are similarly indistinct or excessively costly. Seeking to clarify these issues will offer organized medicine an opportunity to deliver value-based health care. Context (patient, society, and clinician) is critical to finding that clarity, although the clinician context likely offers the best insights into how the ideal of high-value care may be incorporated into minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1445-1453. [PMID: 28986012 PMCID: PMC5666166 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30572-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background There is a scarcity of evidence about the role of patient choice and hospital competition policies on surgical cancer services. Previous evidence has shown that patients are prepared to bypass their nearest cancer centre to receive surgery at more distant centres that better meet their needs. In this national, population-based study we investigated the effect of patient mobility and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption in the National Health Service (NHS) in England, using prostate cancer surgery as a model. Methods We mapped all patients in England who underwent radical prostatectomy between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2014, according to place of residence and treatment location. For each radical prostatectomy centre we analysed the effect of hospital competition (measured by use of a spatial competition index [SCI], with a score of 0 indicating weakest competition and 1 indicating strongest competition) and the effect of being an established robotic radical prostatectomy centre at the start of 2010 on net gains or losses of patients (difference between number of patients treated in a centre and number expected based on their residence), and the likelihood of closing their radical prostatectomy service. Findings Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2014, 19 256 patients underwent radical prostatectomy at an NHS provider in England. Of the 65 radical prostatectomy centres open at the start of the study period, 23 (35%) had a statistically significant net gain of patients during 2010–14. Ten (40%) of these 23 were established robotic centres. 37 (57%) of the 65 centres had a significant net loss of patients, of which two (5%) were established robotic centres and ten (27%) closed their radical prostatectomy service during the study period. Radical prostatectomy centres that closed were more likely to be located in areas with stronger competition (highest SCI quartile [0·87–0·92]; p=0·0081) than in areas with weaker competition. No robotic surgery centre closed irrespective of the size of net losses of patients. The number of centres performing robotic surgery increased from 12 (18%) of the 65 centres at the beginning of 2010 to 39 (71%) of 55 centres open at the end of 2014. Interpretation Competitive factors, in addition to policies advocating centralisation and the requirement to do minimum numbers of surgical procedures, have contributed to large-scale investment in equipment for robotic surgery without evidence of superior outcomes and contributed to the closure of cancer surgery units. If quality performance and outcome indicators are not available to guide patient choice, these policies could threaten health services' ability to deliver equitable and affordable cancer care. Funding National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
| | - Daniel Lewis
- Department of Social and Environment Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walters C, Webb PJ. Maximizing Efficiency and Reducing Robotic Surgery Costs Using the NASA Task Load Index. AORN J 2017; 106:283-294. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2017.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
16
|
Chaudhary MA, Leow JJ, Mossanen M, Chowdhury R, Jiang W, Learn PA, Weissman JS, Chang SL. Patient driven care in the management of prostate cancer: analysis of the United States military healthcare system. BMC Urol 2017; 17:56. [PMID: 28693554 PMCID: PMC5504736 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0247-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient preferences are assumed to impact healthcare resource utilization, especially treatment options. There is limited data exploring this phenomenon. We sought to identify factors associated with patients transferring care for prostatectomy, from military to civilian facilities, and the receipt of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP). Methods Retrospective review of 2006-2010 TRICARE data identified men diagnosed with prostate cancer (ICD-9 185) receiving open radical prostatectomy (ORP; ICD-9: 60.5) or MIRP (ICD-9 60.5 + 54.21/17.42). Patients diagnosed at military facilities but underwent surgery at civilian facilities were defined as “transferring care”. Logistic regression models identified predictors of transferring care for patients diagnosed at military facilities. A secondary analysis identified the predictors of MIRP receipt at civilian facilities. Results Of 1420 patients, 247 (17.4%) transferred care. These patients were more likely to undergo MIRP (OR = 7.83, p < 0.01), and get diagnosed at low-volume military facilities (OR = 6.10, p < 0.01). Our secondary analysis demonstrated that transferring care was strongly associated with undergoing MIRP (OR = 1.51, p = 0.04). Conclusions Patient preferences induced a demand for greater utilization of MIRP and civilian facilities. Further work exploring factors driving these preferences and interventions tailoring them, based on evidence and cost considerations, is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Ali Chaudhary
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey J Leow
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ritam Chowdhury
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wei Jiang
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter A Learn
- Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joel S Weissman
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gershman B, Meier SK, Jeffery MM, Moreira DM, Tollefson MK, Kim SP, Karnes RJ, Shah ND. Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Centralization of Care. J Urol 2017; 198:92-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Gershman
- Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital and Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sarah K. Meier
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Molly M. Jeffery
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Daniel M. Moreira
- Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Simon P. Kim
- Department of Urology, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Nilay D. Shah
- Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wilt TJ, Dahm P. Value of Prostate Cancer Care: New Information on New Therapies Suggest Less is More. Eur Urol 2017; 72:736-737. [PMID: 28571885 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Wilt
- Minneapolis VA Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, the University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Urology Section, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wilt TJ, Dahm P. WITHDRAWN: Value of Prostate Cancer Care: New Information on New Therapies Suggest Less is More. Eur Urol 2017:S0302-2838(17)30402-5. [PMID: 28535949 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.023. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Wilt
- Minneapolis VA Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Urology Section, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Urology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Wei JT, Williamson LD, Ubel PA. Treatment Availability Influences Physicians' Portrayal of Robotic Surgery During Clinical Appointments. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 32:119-125. [PMID: 27153051 PMCID: PMC5289122 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1099502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
In order to empower patients as decision makers, physicians must educate them about their treatment options in a factual, nonbiased manner. We propose that site-specific availability of treatment options may be a novel source of bias, whereby physicians describe treatments more positively when they are available. We performed a content analysis of physicians' descriptions of robotic prostatectomy within 252 appointments at four Veterans Affairs medical centers where robotic surgery was either available or unavailable. We coded how physicians portrayed robotic versus open prostatectomy across specific clinical categories and in the appointment overall. We found that physicians were more likely to describe robotic prostatectomy as superior when it was available [F(1, 42) = 8.65, p = .005]. We also provide initial qualitative evidence that physicians may be shaping their descriptions of robotic prostatectomy in an effort to manage patients' emotions and demand for the robotic technology. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide empirical evidence that treatment availability influences how physicians describe the advantages and disadvantages of treatment alternatives to patients during clinical encounters, which has important practical implications for patient empowerment and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen A Scherr
- a Fuqua School of Business and School of Medicine , Duke University
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- b Departments of Internal Medicine and Psychology , University of Michigan and Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research
| | - John T Wei
- c Department of Urology , University of Michigan
| | | | - Peter A Ubel
- e Fuqua School of Business and Sanford School of Public Policy , Duke University
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Koo K, Yap RL. Trends in Urological Direct-to-Consumer Advertising during Prime-Time Television News Programs. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2017; 4:7-13. [PMID: 37592656 DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to characterize contemporary trends in direct-to-consumer advertising of urological pharmaceutical products on American prime-time television programs. Television is the highest expenditure segment of the consumer drug marketing industry. The extent of advertising in urology and its potential impact on patients are not well understood. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed an indexed database of prime-time news broadcasts on 5 national networks in the United States. The database was queried with the names of 77 urological pharmaceutical products to identify all commercials that aired during a 36-month period between 2010 and 2013. Noncommercial segments were excluded. Descriptive and linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS We analyzed 4,574 broadcasts, representing 3,067.5 hours of prime-time television. A total of 2,068 commercials for 8 products and 4 urological indications were aired, including sildenafil and tadalafil for erectile dysfunction; 2 testosterone products for hypogonadism; fesoterodine, oxybutynin and solifenacin for overactive bladder; and sipuleucel-T for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Commercials for male oriented indications accounted for 90% of the sample. At least 1 urological advertisement was contained in 1,744 broadcasts (38%). The introduction of television marketing for newly approved testosterone supplementation products in 2012 corresponded to strongly linear growth in overall urological advertising, reaching peak levels in 2013. CONCLUSIONS Urological pharmaceutical products have been consistently advertised on television. Commercials have extensively targeted male oriented indications. Viewers of national news programs were exposed to urological advertising during about 40% of broadcasts with steadily increasing exposure since 2012. Providers should be aware of these trends to contextualize demand and monitor prescribing patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Koo
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Ronald L Yap
- Concord Hospital Center for Urologic Care, Concord, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kiani S, Kurian D, Henkin S, Desai P, Brunel F, Poston R. Direct to consumer advertising of robotic heart bypass surgery: effectiveness, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE MARKETING 2016; 10:358-375. [PMID: 28331538 DOI: 10.1108/ijphm-05-2015-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Robotic coronary artery bypass (rCABG) is a relatively novel and less invasive form of surgery. A yearlong direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) campaign was initiated to provide the community with information regarding rCABG, increase awareness and recruit patients. To optimize information content and ensure appropriate messaging for future campaigns, this study aims to analyze the campaign effectiveness and compared service quality perceptions and clinical outcomes, following surgery across DTCA-responder and control groups.
Design/methodology/approach
The institution initiated an rCABG program and one-year DTCA campaign. The authors prospectively documented all rCABG referrals prompted by these ads (DTCA-responder group) and concurrent referrals from medical providers (controls). Groups were compared according to baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, patient satisfaction (HCAHPS survey) and functional capacity at three weeks (Duke Activity Status Index). At six months, both groups were surveyed for patient satisfaction and unmet expectations.
Findings
There were 103 DTCA responders and 77 controls. The subset of responders that underwent rCABG (n = 54) had similar characteristics to controls, except they were younger, less likely to have lung disease or to be scheduled as an urgent case. Both groups had similar 30-day clinical outcomes, functional capacity recovery and overall satisfaction at three weeks. Follow-up interviews at six months and four years revealed that the DTCA group reported more unmet expectations regarding the “size of the skin incisions” and “recovery time” but no concern about “expertise of their surgeon”.
Practical implications
The DTCA campaign was effective at recruiting patients. The specific focus of the ads and narrow timeframe for decision-making about CABG lends confidence that the incremental cases seen during the campaign were prompted primarily by DTCA. However, differences in unmet expectations underscore the need to better understand the impact of message content on patients recruited via DTCA campaigns.
Originality/value
This is one of the first studies to provide real-world direct empirical evidence of patients’ clinical and attitudinal outcomes for DTCA campaigns. Furthermore, the findings contradict prevailing beliefs that DTCA is ineffective for prompting surgical referrals.
Collapse
|
23
|
Borgmann H, Mager R, Salem J, Bründl J, Kunath F, Thomas C, Haferkamp A, Tsaur I. Robotic Prostatectomy on the Web: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Assessment. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016; 14:e355-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Revised: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
Ramirez D, Ganesan V, Nelson RJ, Haber GP. Reducing Costs for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Three-instrument Technique. Urology 2016; 95:213-5. [PMID: 27320683 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.03.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 03/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe our technique for performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and pelvic lymph node dissection using only 3 robotic instruments to reduce disposable costs associated with the robotic surgical platform. METHODS The financial impact of robotic surgery is real. Whereas the initial capital investment of the robotic platform (including the cost of the device itself and the maintenance contract) is largely fixed, the cost of disposable instrumentation can vary depending on utilization. Herein we describe our technique for 3-instrument robotic radical prostatectomy that may decrease costs by limiting the use of disposable instruments. RESULTS Exclusion of the high-cost energy instruments may reduce operative costs by up to 40%. In addition, using 1 robotic needle driver vs 2 may decrease overall costs by another 12%. At our institution, we have adopted these techniques in cost-efficiency and have gone further by only using 3 instruments during robotic radical prostatectomy. The only 3 instruments necessary to perform a successful RALP are a robotic needle driver, Prograsp forceps, and monopolar scissors. CONCLUSION To improve the value of care while utilizing robotic technology, we must be cognizant of keeping operative costs to a minimum while maintaining positive patient outcomes. We demonstrate here a method to decrease disposable operating room costs while preserving the ability to successfully perform a RALP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ramirez
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| | - Vishnu Ganesan
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ryan J Nelson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stone BV, Forde JC, Levit VB, Lee RK, Te AE, Chughtai B. Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:1761-1766. [PMID: 27209310 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3040-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In July 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety communication regarding serious complications associated with surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse, prompting increased media and public attention. This study sought to analyze internet search activity and news article volume after this FDA warning and to evaluate the quality of websites providing patient-centered information. METHODS Google Trends™ was utilized to evaluate search engine trends for the term "pelvic organ prolapse" and associated terms between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2014. Google News™ was utilized to quantify the number of news articles annually under the term "pelvic organ prolapse." The search results for the term "pelvic organ prolapse" were assessed for quality using the Health On the Net Foundation (HON) certification. RESULTS There was a significant increase in search activity from 37.42 in 2010 to 57.75 in 2011, at the time of the FDA communication (p = 0.021). No other annual interval had a statistically significant increase in search activity. The single highest monthly search activity, given the value of 100, was August 2011, immediately following the July 2011 notification, with the next highest value being 98 in July 2011. Linear regression analysis of news articles per year since the FDA communication revealed r2 = 0.88, with a coefficient of 186. Quality assessment demonstrated that 42 % of websites were HON-certified, with .gov sites providing the highest quality information. CONCLUSIONS Although the 2011 FDA safety communication on surgical mesh was associated with increased public and media attention, the quality of relevant health information on the internet remains of poor quality. Future quality assurance measures may be critical in enabling patients to play active roles in their own healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin V Stone
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - James C Forde
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Valerie B Levit
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Richard K Lee
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Alexis E Te
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Bilal Chughtai
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 425 E 61st Street, 12th floor, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shen C, Tina Shih YC. Therapeutic substitutions in the midst of new technology diffusion: The case of treatment for localized prostate cancer. Soc Sci Med 2016; 151:110-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/09/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
27
|
Deveci S, Gotto GT, Alex B, O'Brien K, Mulhall JP. A survey of patient expectations regarding sexual function following radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2016; 118:641-5. [PMID: 26906935 DOI: 10.1111/bju.13398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the understanding of patients, who had previously undergone radical prostatectomy (RP), about their postoperative sexual function, as clinical experience suggests that some RP patients have unrealistic expectations about their long-term sexual function. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients presenting within 3 months of their open RP or robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were questioned about the sexual function information that they had received preoperatively. Patients were questioned about erectile function (EF), postoperative ejaculatory status, orgasm, and postoperative penile morphology changes. Statistical analyses were performed to assess for differences between patients who underwent open RP vs RALP. RESULTS In all, 336 consecutive patients (from nine surgeons) with a mean (SD) age of 64 (11) years had the survey instrument administered (216 underwent open RP and 120 underwent RALP). There were no significant differences in patient age or comorbidity profiles between the two groups. Only 38% of men had an accurate recollection of their nerve-sparing status. The mean (SD) elapsed time after RP at the time of postoperative assessment was 3 (2) months. RALP patients expected a shorter EF recovery time (6 vs 12 months, P = 0.02), a higher likelihood of recovery back to baseline EF (75% vs 50%, P = 0.01), and a lower potential need for intracavernosal injection therapy (4% vs 20%, P = 0.01). Almost half of all patients were unaware that they were rendered anejaculatory by their surgery. None of the RALP patients and only 10% of open RP patients recalled being informed of the potential for penile length loss (P < 0.01) and none were aware of the association between RP and Peyronie's disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients who have undergone RP have largely unrealistic expectations about their postoperative sexual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serkan Deveci
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. , .,Department of Urology, Medical School of Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey. ,
| | - Geoffrey T Gotto
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Byron Alex
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Keith O'Brien
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Mulhall
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reimbursement for Prostate Cancer Treatment. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00041-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Abstract
Surgical robotic use has grown exponentially in spite of limited or uncertain benefits and large costs. In certain situations, adoption of robotic technology provides value to patients and society. In other cases, however, the robot provides little or no increase in surgical quality, with increased expense, and, therefore, does not add value to health care. The surgical robot is expensive to purchase, maintain and operate, and can contribute to increased consumerism in relation to surgical procedures, and increased reliance on the technology, thus driving future increases in health-care expenditure. Given the current need for budget constraints, the cost-effectiveness of specific procedures must be evaluated. The surgical robot should be used when cost-effective, but traditional open and laparoscopic techniques also need to be continually fostered.
Collapse
|
30
|
Delto JC, Wayne G, Yanes R, Nieder AM, Bhandari A. Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation. J Endourol 2014; 29:556-60. [PMID: 25333511 DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Since the introduction of robotic surgery for radical prostatectomy, the cost-benefit of this technology has been under scrutiny. While robotic surgery professes to offer multiple advantages, including reduced blood loss, reduced length of stay, and expedient recovery, the associated costs tend to be significantly higher, secondary to the fixed cost of the robot as well as the variable costs associated with instrumentation. This study provides a simple framework for the careful consideration of costs during the selection of equipment and materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two experienced robotic surgeons at our institution as well as several at other institutions were queried about their preferred instrument usage for robot-assisted prostatectomy. Costs of instruments and materials were obtained and clustered by type and price. A minimal set of instruments was identified and compared against alternative instrumentation. A retrospective review of 125 patients who underwent robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer at our institution was performed to compare estimated blood loss (EBL), operative times, and intraoperative complications for both surgeons. Our surgeons now conceptualize instrument costs as proportional changes to the cost of the baseline minimal combination. RESULTS Robotic costs at our institution were reduced by eliminating an energy source like the Ligasure or vessel sealer, exploiting instrument versatility, and utilizing inexpensive tools such as Hem-o-lok clips. Such modifications reduced surgeon 1's cost of instrumentation to ∼40% less compared with surgeon 2 and up to 32% less than instrumentation used by surgeons at other institutions. Surgeon 1's combination may not be optimal for all robotic surgeons; however, it establishes a minimally viable toolbox for our institution through a rudimentary cost analysis. A similar analysis may aid others in better conceptualizing long-term costs not as nominal, often unwieldy prices, but as percent changes in spending. With regard to intraoperative outcomes, the use of a minimally viable toolbox did not result in increased EBL, operative time, or intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION Simple changes to surgeon preference and creative utilization of instruments can eliminate 40% of costs incurred on robotic instruments alone. Moreover, EBL, operative times, and intraoperative complications are not compromised as a result of cost reduction. Our process of identifying such improvements is straightforward and may be replicated by other robotic surgeons. Further prospective multicenter trials should be initiated to assess other methods of cost reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan C Delto
- 1 Department of Urology, Mount Sinai Medical Center , Miami Beach, Florida
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim SP, Gross CP, Smaldone MC, Han LC, Van Houten H, Lotan Y, Svatek RS, Thompson RH, Karnes RJ, Trinh QD, Kutikov A, Shah ND. Perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement by type of radical prostatectomy: results from a privately insured patient population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2014; 18:13-7. [PMID: 25311766 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2014.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Revised: 08/12/2014] [Accepted: 08/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing use of robotic surgery in the United States, the comparative effectiveness and differences in reimbursement of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) and open prostatectomy (ORP) in privately insured patients are unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the differences in perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement in a privately insured patient population who were surgically treated for prostate cancer. METHODS Using a large private insurance database, we identified 17,610 prostate cancer patients who underwent either MIRP or ORP from 2003 to 2010. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, 90-day readmissions rates and hospital reimbursement. Multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate for differences in primary outcomes across surgical approaches. RESULTS Overall, 8981 (51.0%) and 8629 (49.0%) surgically treated prostate cancer patients underwent MIRP and ORP, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing MIRP markedly rose from 11.9% in 2003 to 72.5% in 2010 (P<0.001 for trend). Relative to ORP, MIRP was associated with a shorter median LOS (1.0 day vs 3.0 days; P<0.001) and lower adjusted odds ratio of perioperative complications (OR: 0.82; P<0.001). However, the 90-day readmission rates of MIRP and ORP were similar (OR: 0.99; P=0.76). MIRP provided higher adjusted mean hospital reimbursement compared with ORP (US $19,292 vs. US $17,347; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among privately insured patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, robotic surgery rapidly disseminated with over 70% of patients undergoing MIRP by 2009-2010. Although MIRP was associated with shorter LOS and modestly better perioperative outcomes, hospitals received higher reimbursement for MIRP compared with ORP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S P Kim
- 1] University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Urology Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA [2] Center for Reducing Racial Disparities, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C P Gross
- 1] Yale University, Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT, USA [2] Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - M C Smaldone
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - L C Han
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - H Van Houten
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Y Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - R S Svatek
- Department of Urology, UT Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - R H Thompson
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Urology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - R J Karnes
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Urology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Q-D Trinh
- Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Urologic Surgery, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Kutikov
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - N D Shah
- 1] Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA [2] Mayo Clinic, Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chang SL, Kibel AS, Brooks JD, Chung BI. The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the USA. BJU Int 2014; 115:929-36. [PMID: 24958338 DOI: 10.1111/bju.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the surgeon characteristics associated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) adoption and determine the possible impact of this adoption on practice patterns and cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study with a weighted sample size of 489,369 men who underwent non-RARP (i.e., open or laparoscopic RP) or RARP in the USA from 2003 to 2010 was performed. We evaluated predictors for RARP adoption, defined as performing >50% of annual RP using the robotic approach. Additionally, we identified the resulting changes in prostate cancer surgery practice patterns and expenditures. RESULTS From 2003 to 2010, RARP adoption increased from 0.7% to 42% of surgeons performing RP. High-volume surgeons, defined as performing >24 RPs annually, had statically significantly higher odds of adopting RARP throughout the study period. From 2005 to 2007, adoption was more common among surgeons at teaching (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-3.4), intermediate- (200-399 beds; OR 5.96, 95% CI 1.3-26.5) and large-sized hospitals (≥ 400 beds; OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.4-25.8); after 2007, adoption was more common among surgeons at urban hospitals (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4). RARP adoption was generally associated with increased RP volume, greatest for high-volume surgeons and least for low-volume surgeons (<5 RPs annually). The annual number of surgeons performing RP decreased from about 10,000 to 8200, with the proportion of cases performed by high-volume surgeons increasing from 10% to 45%. RARP was more costly, disproportionally contributing to the 40% increase in annual prostate cancer surgery expenditures. RARP costs generally decreased plateauing at slightly over $10,000, while non-RARP costs increased to nearly $9000 by the end of the study. CONCLUSION There was widespread RARP adoption in the USA between 2003 and 2010, particularly among high-volume surgeons. The diffusion of RARP was associated with a centralisation of care and an increased economic burden for prostate cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Centre for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Centre, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Centre, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dixon PR, Grant RC, Urbach DR. The impact of marketing language on patient preference for robot-assisted surgery. Surg Innov 2014; 22:15-9. [PMID: 24902683 DOI: 10.1177/1553350614537562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is gaining momentum as a new trend in minimally invasive surgery. With limited evidence supporting its use in place of the far less expensive conventional laparoscopic surgery, it has been suggested that marketing pressure is partly responsible for its widespread adoption. The impact of phrases that promote the novelty of robot-assisted surgery on patient decision making has not been investigated. We conducted a discrete choice experiment to elicit preference of partial colectomy technique for a hypothetical diagnosis of colon cancer. A convenience sample of 38 participants in an ambulatory general surgery clinic consented to participate. Each participant made 2 treatment decisions between robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery, with robot-assisted surgery described as "innovative" and "state-of-the-art" in one of the decisions (marketing frame), and by a disclosure of the uncertainty of available evidence in the other (evidence-based frame). The magnitude of the framing effect was large with 12 of 38 subjects (31.6%, P = .005) selecting robot-assisted surgery in the marketing frame and not the evidence-based frame. This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate that words that highlight novelty have an important influence on patient preference for robot-assisted surgery and that use of more neutral language can mitigate this effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David R Urbach
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Isgoren AE, Saitz TR, Serefoglu EC. Erectile Function Outcomes after Robot‐Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Is It Superior to Open Retropubic or Laparoscopic Approach? Sex Med Rev 2014; 2:10-23. [DOI: 10.1002/smrj.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
35
|
Review of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2013; 28:1413-24. [PMID: 24357422 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3342-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
36
|
Knisely JPS, Potters L. Is a half-truth a whole lie? J Oncol Pract 2013; 9:63-4. [PMID: 23633974 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2012.000790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P S Knisely
- North Shore University Hospital, Department of Radiation Medicine, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Prabhu V, Lee T, McClintock TR, Lepor H. Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Rev Urol 2013; 15:161-177. [PMID: 24659913 PMCID: PMC3922321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Many clinically localized prostate cancers that are diagnosed today are low risk, and prevention of disease-specific mortality may only be realized decades after treatment. Radical prostatectomy (RP) may adversely impact health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by causing both transient or permanent urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. In contrast, RP may also improve HRQOL via relief of lower urinary tract symptoms in men suffering from these symptoms prior to surgery. Because the average man treated for prostate cancer has a life expectancy of approximately 14 years, it is imperative to consider the long-term impact of RP on both survival and HRQOL in treatment decision making. This comprehensive literature review examines short-, intermediate-, and long-term HRQOL following RP. In addition, the long-term results of RP are compared with other treatment modalities for treating clinically localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Prabhu
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Ted Lee
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Tyler R McClintock
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Herbert Lepor
- Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shah A, Paly JJ, Efstathiou JA, Bekelman JE. Physician evaluation of internet health information on proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 85:e173-7. [PMID: 23245278 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2012] [Revised: 10/13/2012] [Accepted: 10/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients considering prostate cancer (PCa) treatment options report seeking proton beam therapy (PBT) based in part on information readily available on the Internet. There is, however, potential for considerable variation in Internet health information (IHI). We thus evaluated the characteristics, quality, and accuracy of IHI on PBT for PCa. METHODS AND MATERIALS We undertook a qualitative research study using snowball-purposive sampling in which we evaluated the top 50 Google search results for "proton prostate cancer." Quality was evaluated on a 5-point scale using the validated 15-question DISCERN instrument. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing IHI with the best available evidence. RESULTS Thirty-seven IHI websites were included in the final sample. These websites most frequently were patient information/support resources (46%), were focused exclusively on PBT (51%), and had a commercial affiliation (38%). There was a significant difference in quality according to the type of IHI. Substantial inaccuracies were noted in the study sample compared with best available or contextual evidence. CONCLUSIONS There are shortcomings in quality and accuracy in consumer-oriented IHI on PBT for PCa. Providers must be prepared to educate patients how to critically evaluate IHI related to PBT for PCa to best inform their treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Certificate of need legislation and the dissemination of robotic surgery for prostate cancer. J Urol 2012; 189:80-5. [PMID: 23164388 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2012] [Accepted: 07/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The uncertainty about the incremental benefit of robotic prostatectomy and its higher associated costs makes it an ideal target for state based certificate of need laws, which have been enacted in several states. We studied the relationship between certificate of need laws and market level adoption of robotic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare data from 2003 through 2007 to identify men 66 years old or older treated with prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Using data from the American Health Planning Association, we categorized Health Service Areas according to the stringency of certificate of need regulations (ie low vs high stringency) presiding over that market. We assessed our outcomes (probability of adopting robotic prostatectomy and propensity for robotic prostatectomy use in adopting Health Service Areas) using Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regression models, respectively. RESULTS Compared to low stringency markets, high stringency markets were more racially diverse (54% vs 15% nonwhite, p <0.01), and had similar population densities (886 vs 861 people per square mile, p = 0.97) and median incomes ($42,344 vs $39,770, p = 0.56). In general, both market types had an increase in the adoption and utilization of robotic prostatectomy. However, the probability of robotic prostatectomy adoption (p = 0.22) did not differ based on a market's certificate of need stringency and use was lower in high stringency markets (p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS State based certificate of need regulations were ineffective in constraining robotic surgery adoption. Despite decreased use in high stringency markets, similar adoption rates suggest that other factors impact the diffusion of robotic prostatectomy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Biehn Stewart S, Reed SD, Moul JW. Will the future of health care lead to the end of the robotic golden years? Eur Urol 2012; 65:325-7; discussion 327-8. [PMID: 23116656 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 10/12/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Biehn Stewart
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Judd W Moul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|