Modernizing Diabetes Care Quality Measures

1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at https://professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Stakeholders' Perceived Barriers and Successes of Quality Improvement Programs for Patients With Diabetes Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China"

Rasooly et al performed a qualitative evaluation to characterize the experiences of 26 stakeholders with the implementation of diabetes-related quality and performance measures delivered in primary healthcare to patients with diabetes in metropolitan China. Results from this cross-sectional investigation identified relevant gaps in primary care delivery for people with diabetes from one major center in China. As diabetes is a prevalent condition worldwide, lessons learned from this research can be useful to guide, refine, and improve quality measurement evaluations in primary care in China and other countries. In this commentary, we comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the study, suggest future directions, and discuss how lessons learned from this research can be helpful to guide, refine, and improve the quality measurement of diabetes care in other countries.

Diabetic Kidney Disease Prevention Care Model Development

More than one-third of people with diabetes develop diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which substantially increases risks of kidney failure, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypoglycemia, death, and other adverse health outcomes. A multifaceted approach incorporating self-management education, lifestyle optimization, pharmacological intervention, CVD prevention, and psychosocial support is crucial to mitigate the onset and progression of DKD. The American Diabetes Association convened an expert panel to develop the DKD Prevention Model presented herein. This model addresses prevention and treatment, including screening guidelines, diagnostic tools, and management approaches; comprehensive, holistic interventions; well-defined roles for interdisciplinary health care professionals; community engagement; and future directions for research and policy.

Advancing Equity in Diabetes Prevention, Treatment, and Outcomes: Delivering on Our Values

Diabetes inequities exist from diabetes prevention to outcomes and are rooted in the social drivers (determinants) of health. Historical policies such as "redlining" have adversely affected diabetes prevalence, control, and outcomes for decades. Advancing diabetes equity requires multimodal approaches, addressing both individual-level diabetes education, self-management, and treatment along with addressing social needs, and working to improve upstream drivers of health. All individuals affected by diabetes must advocate for policies to advance diabetes equity at the organizational, local, state, and federal levels. Centering diabetes efforts and interventions on equity will improve diabetes treatment and care for all.

Quality Measurement as a Path to High Quality Care Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China"

A rigorous evaluation of the implementation of a diabetes quality measure implementation program across community healthcare clinics in Shanghai, China, where both quality measurement and primary care delivery are relatively recent but centrally supported, identified important concerns about the meaningfulness, feasibility, and accuracy of quality measures that are relevant to all quality measurement programs. These include the importance of stakeholder involvement in measure development and implementation, the need to select measures that accurately and reliably reflect care quality, the link between incentives for improved performance and data manipulation, the necessity for scientific credibility and practical feasibility of the measure, and the assurance that measure performance can be impacted by those being evaluated. In addition to elaborating on these aspects of quality measurement, we also discuss the need for quality measures that are balanced across established domains of quality, are not burdensome to participants, and are transparent, parsimonious, nimble, and oriented around continuous evaluation and improvement.

Advances in the management of type 2 diabetes in adults

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic and progressive cardiometabolic disorder that affects more than 10% of adults worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, disability, and high costs. Over the past decade, the pattern of management of diabetes has shifted from a predominantly glucose centric approach, focused on lowering levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), to a directed complications centric approach, aimed at preventing short term and long term complications of diabetes, and a pathogenesis centric approach, which looks at the underlying metabolic dysfunction of excess adiposity that both causes and complicates the management of diabetes. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in patient centred care for type 2 diabetes, focusing on drug and non-drug approaches to reducing the risks of complications of diabetes in adults. We also discuss the effects of social determinants of health on the management of diabetes, particularly as they affect the treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.

Association of Health-Related Social Needs With Quality and Utilization Outcomes in a Medicare Advantage Population With Diabetes

Importance

Recent research highlights the association of social determinants of health with health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Objective

To examine associations between health-related social needs (HRSNs) and health care quality and utilization outcomes in a Medicare Advantage population with T2D.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study used medical and pharmacy claims data from 2019. An HRSN survey was given between October 16, 2019, and February 29, 2020, to Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of T2D, age of 20 to 89 years, continuous Medicare Advantage enrollment in 2019, and response to the HRSN survey. Data were analyzed between June 2021 and January 2022.

Exposures

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage, diagnosis of T2D, and completion of a survey on HRSNs.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Quality outcomes included diabetes medication adherence, statin adherence, completion of a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) laboratory test in the past 12 months, and controlled HbA1c. Utilization outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, potentially avoidable hospitalization, emergency department discharge, and readmission.

Results

Of the 21 528 Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with T2D included in the study (mean [SD] age, 71.0 [8.3] years; 55.4% women), most (56.9%) had at least 1 HRSN. Among the population with T2D reporting HRSNs, the most prevalent were financial strain (73.6%), food insecurity (47.5%), and poor housing quality (39.1%). In adjusted models, loneliness (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99), lack of transportation (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92), utility insecurity (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98), and housing insecurity (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91) were each associated with lower diabetes medication adherence. Loneliness and lack of transportation were associated with increased emergency visits (marginal effects of 173.0 [95% CI, 74.2-271.9] and 244.6 [95% CI, 150.4-338.9] emergency visits per 1000 beneficiaries for loneliness and transportation, respectively). Food insecurity was the HRSN most consistently associated with higher acute care utilization (marginal effects of 84.6 [95% CI, 19.8-149.4] emergency visits, 30.4 [95% CI, 9.5-51.3] inpatient encounters, and 17.1 [95% CI, 4.7-29.5] avoidable hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with T2D, some HRSNs were associated with care quality and utilization. The results of the study may be used to direct interventions to the social needs most associated with T2D health outcomes and inform policy decisions at the insurance plan and community level.

Immunological profile of diabetic foot ulcers: update review

The most frequent consequence of diabetes mellitus, diabetic foot ulcers frequently do not heal and necessitate lower limb amputation. According to estimates, DFU accounts for 50% to 70% of all lower limb amputations, and 50% of patients with DFU have peripheral artery disease (PAD), which is occasionally brought on by atherosclerosis. Deformity of foot, peripheral artery disease (PAD), loss protective sensation (LOPS), and a history of foot ulcers. Global prevalence for DFUs varies by region. One of the frequent complications of diabetes in poor nations, such as Iraq, is diabetic foot; approximately two-thirds of the patients with diabetes have Diabetic Foot disorder (DFD) in Iraq and this health issue had significant negative social and economic effects. The Saudi Arabia and Bahrain have the highest prevalence rates of DFU; the reported yearly incidence of diabetic foot ulcers ranges from "2.1% to 7.4%". There are three types of diabetic foot ulcers: neuropathic, neuroischaemic, and ischemic. An infected DFU often contains three to five different types of bacteria, including gram-positive aerobes, such as "Staphylococcus sp.", gram-positive anaerobes, gram negative aerobes, gram negative anaerobes, and fungi (Candida spp.). Numerous studies have demonstrated that effective management of DFU can significantly decrease, postpone, or even completely avoid consequences like infection, gangrene, amputation, and death.