Exhaled nitric oxide daily evaluation is effective in monitoring exposure to relevant allergens in asthmatic children

Using FeNO Measurement in Clinical Asthma Management

Asthma is a common and heterogeneous disease, characterised by lower airway inflammation and airflow limitation. Critical factors in asthma management include establishing an accurate diagnosis and ensuring appropriate selection and dosage of anti-inflammatory therapies. The majority of asthma patients exhibit type 2 (T2) inflammation, with increased interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13 signalling, often with associated eosinophilia. Identifying lower airway eosinophilia with sputum induction improves asthma outcomes, but is time consuming and costly. Increased T2-inflammation leads to upregulation of nitric oxide (NO) release into the airway, with increasing fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) reflecting greater T2-inflammation. FeNO can be easily and quickly measured in the clinic, offering a point of care surrogate measure of the degree of lower airway inflammation. FeNO testing can be used to help confirm an asthma diagnosis, to guide inhaled corticosteroid therapy, to assess adherence to treatment, and to aid selection of appropriate biologic therapy. However, FeNO levels may also be influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors other than asthma, including nasal polyposis and cigarette smoking, and must be interpreted in the broader clinical context rather than viewed in isolation. This review discusses the clinical application of FeNO measurement in asthma care, from diagnosis to treatment selection, and describes its place in current international expert guidelines.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in the management of asthma: a position paper of the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS) and Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Asthma prevalence in Italy is on the rise and is estimated to be over 6% of the general population. The diagnosis of asthma can be challenging and elusive, especially in children and the last two decades has brought evidences that asthma is not a single disease but consists of various phenotypes. Symptoms can be underestimated by the patient or underreported to the clinician and physical signs can be scanty. Usual objective measures, like spirometry, are necessary but sometimes not significant. Despite proper treatment, asthma can be a very severe condition (even leading to death), however new drugs have recently become available which can be very effective in its control. Since asthma is currently thought to be caused by inflammation, a direct measure of the latter can be of paramount importance. For this purpose, the measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FE_NO) has been used since the early years of the current century as a non-invasive, easy-to-assess tool useful for diagnosing and managing asthma. This SIP-IRS/SIAAIC Position Paper is a narrative review which summarizes the evidence behind the usefulness of FE_NO in the diagnosis, management and phenotypization of asthma.

Practical Approach to Children Presenting with Eosinophila and Hypereosinophilia

Eosinophilia is not a rare finding in clinical practice, and often poses problems in terms of etiologic research and differential diagnosis. Peripheral eosinophilia is defined by a blood eosinophil count > 500 cells/μL. It is classified into mild (500-1500 cells/μl), moderate (1500-5000 cells/μl) and severe for an eosinophil count > 5000 cells /μl. The term "hypereosinophilia" defines a condition characterized by a blood eosinophil count >1500 cells/μl in at least two consecutive tests made with a minimum of a 4-week interval. The causes of eosinophilia are various, and can be summarized by the acronym "APLV" which refers to Allergic disorders, Parasitic infections, Leukemia/ Lymphomas (and solid tumors) and Vasculitis-Immunodeficiency diseases, with allergic disorders and parasitic infections representing the most commonly identified causes. Allergic disorders are usually associated with mild eosinophilia, whereas values >20.000 cell/μl are highly suggestive for myeloproliferative disorders. Eosinophils may also be directly responsible for organ damage, mainly at cardiac, pulmonary and cutaneous level, deriving from the release of the granule products, of lipidic mediators and cytokines. Therefore, in the physician's approach to a patient with persistent hypereosinophilia, it is also important to investigate the presence of organ involvement. In this review, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for children presenting with either blood eosinophilia or hypereosinophilia. This algorithm focuses on the patient's history and clinical manifestations as the first step and the level and persistence of blood eosinophilia as the second, and this can help the physician to identify patients presenting with an elevated blood eosinophil count that need further laboratory or instrumental investigations.

Setting reference values for exhaled nitric oxide: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The values obtained when the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is measured are affected by several factors that are specific to the individual patient, making interpretation difficult, especially in the initial assessment of patients with respiratory symptoms.

METHODS

Systematic review of studies on FeNO reference values and individual-specific factors that influence them.

RESULTS

From 3739 references, 15 studies were included. Four studies included children and adolescents. In nine studies, samples were selected from the general population. Most studies reported objective measures for atopy (nine studies), but not for smoking status (one). Significant determinants of FeNO values reported were age and height (seven studies), atopy (six), smoking (four), weight (four), sex (three) and race (three). Additional factors were included in eight studies. R2 was reported in only five studies. The logarithmic transformation of FeNO was inadequately described in seven studies.

CONCLUSION

There are several equations for FeNO reference values that may be used in clinical practice, although the factors they include and the statistical methods they use vary considerably. We recommend the development of standard methods for the evaluation of normal FeNO data and that reference equations should be formulated based on a predetermined physiological model.

Seasonal changes in nasal cytology in mite-allergic patients

Background

House dust mites (HDMs) are a major cause of allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma worldwide. Recent studies suggested that the allergen load presents seasonal modifications, giving rise to seasonal variation in nasal inflammation and symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate by nasal cytology whether nasal inflammation in mite-allergic patients changes with the seasons of the year.

Methods

The study included 16 patients (seven males and nine females, mean age 38.1 years) with persistent AR caused by monosensitization to HDMs. Nasal cytology was performed in all patients once monthly for 1 year.

Results

Nasal cytology showed that the cells most commonly detected in the nasal mucosa were neutrophils. During the period from October to April, a peak in the number of neutrophils and also the presence of significant numbers of eosinophils, mast cells, and lymphocytes/plasma cells were found, which shows the occurrence of more intense inflammation during these months.

Conclusion

Nasal cytology provides useful data in detecting nasal inflammation and its association with the clinical stage of AR. The seasonal variations in nasal cytology are likely to be induced by the fluctuations in the HDM allergen that have been uncovered in recent investigations.

Hydrogen peroxide content and pH of expired breath condensate from patients with asthma and COPD

BACKGROUND

Oxidative stress is implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Analysis of the expired breath condensate (EBC) has been suggested to provide non-invasive inflammatory markers that reflect oxidative stress in the airways.

OBJECTIVE

The present study attempts to elucidate whether the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels and pH values in EBC may be useful as biomarkers of the activity or severity of asthma and COPD.

METHODS

We measured the H2O2 levels and pH values using a derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites exhalation test kit (Diacron) and a pH analyser, respectively, in EBC obtained using an EcoScreen from 29 patients with asthma, 33 with COPD, and 33 healthy individuals (all non-smokers). We then examined the relationships among oxidative stress and the asthma control test (ACT) or COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, pulmonary function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and the extent of low attenuation areas on HRCT.

RESULTS

The H2O2 levels were elevated and pH was lower in both asthma (H2O2; 8.75 ± 0.88 μM, p < 0.01, pH; 7.14 ± 0.07, p < 0.05) and COPD (H2O2; 7.44 ± 0.89 μM, p < 0.01, pH; 6.87 ± 0.10, p < 0.01) compared with control subjects (H2O2; 3.42 ± 0.66 μM, pH; 7.35 ± 0.04). Neither the H2O2 levels nor pH correlated with the ACT scores and FeNO in asthma patients. Neither the H2O2 levels nor pH significantly correlated with the pulmonary function in asthma and COPD. However, the CAT scores significantly correlated with the H2O2 levels in patients with COPD (r = 0.52, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that oxidative stress is involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and COPD and that the H2O2 levels in EBC might reflect the health status in COPD.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in children with acute exacerbation of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has a utility as a diagnostic or predictive maker in acute exacerbations of asthma in children.

DESIGN

Analysis of data collected in a pediatric asthma cohort.

SETTING

Pediatric Chest Clinic of a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A cohort of children with asthma was followed up every 3 months in addition to any acute exacerbation visits. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) and FENO were obtained at all visits. We compared the FENO values during acute exacerbations with those at baseline and those during the follow up.

RESULTS

243 asthmatic children were enrolled from August 2009 to December 2011 [mean (SD) follow up - 434 (227) days]. FENO during acute exacerbations was not different from FENO during follow up; however, FENO was significantly higher than personal best FENO during follow up (P < 0.0001). FENO during acute exacerbation did not correlate with the severity of acute exacerbation (P=0.29). The receiver operating characteristics curve for FENO as a marker for acute exacerbation had an area under the curve of 0.59. Cut-off of 20 ppb had a poor sensitivity (44%) and specificity (68.7%) for acute exacerbation.

CONCLUSIONS

FENO levels during acute exacerbation increase from their personal best levels. However, no particular cut off could be identified that could help in either diagnosing acute exacerbation or predicting its severity.

Exhaled nitric oxide in pediatrics: what is new for practice purposes and clinical research in children?

Fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) is universally considered an indirect marker of eosinophilic airways inflammation, playing an important role in the physiopathology of childhood asthma. Advances in technology and standardization have allowed a wider use of FeNO in clinical practice in children from the age of four years. FeNO measurements add a new dimension to the traditional clinical tools (symptoms scores, lung function tests) in the assessment of asthma. To date a number of studies have suggested a possible use of FeNO in early identification of exacerbation risk and in inhaled corticosteroids titration. The aim of this paper is to address practical issues of interest to paediatric clinicians who are attempting to use FeNO measurements as an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis and management of childhood airway diseases.

Environmental effects on fractional exhaled nitric oxide in allergic children

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation in asthma and respiratory allergy. Environmental factors, especially indoor and outdoor air quality, may play an important role in triggering acute exacerbations of respiratory symptoms. The authors have reviewed the literature reporting effects of outdoor and indoor pollutants on FeNO in children. Although the findings are not consistent, urban and industrial pollution-mainly particles (PM(2.5) and PM(10)), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), and sulfur dioxide (SO(2))-as well as formaldehyde and electric baseboard heating have been shown to increase FeNO, whilst ozone (O(3)) tends to decrease it. Among children exposed to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) with a genetic polymorphisms in nitric oxide synthase genes (NOS), a higher nicotine exposure was associated with lower FeNO levels. Finally, although more studies are needed in order to better investigate the effect of gene and environment interactions which may affect the interpretation of FeNO values in the management of children with asthma, clinicians are recommended to consider environmental exposures when taking medical histories for asthma and respiratory allergy. Further research is also needed to assess the effects of remedial interventions aimed at reducing/abating environmental exposures in asthmatic/allergic patients.

An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications

BACKGROUND

Measurement of fractional nitric oxide (NO) concentration in exhaled breath (Fe(NO)) is a quantitative, noninvasive, simple, and safe method of measuring airway inflammation that provides a complementary tool to other ways of assessing airways disease, including asthma. While Fe(NO) measurement has been standardized, there is currently no reference guideline for practicing health care providers to guide them in the appropriate use and interpretation of Fe(NO) in clinical practice.

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based guidelines for the interpretation of Fe(NO) measurements that incorporate evidence that has accumulated over the past decade.

METHODS

We created a multidisciplinary committee with expertise in the clinical care, clinical science, or basic science of airway disease and/or NO. The committee identified important clinical questions, synthesized the evidence, and formulated recommendations. Recommendations were developed using pragmatic systematic reviews of the literature and the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

The evidence related to the use of Fe(NO) measurements is reviewed and clinical practice recommendations are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of chronic inflammatory airway disease including asthma, conventional tests such as FEV(1) reversibility or provocation tests are only indirectly associated with airway inflammation. Fe(NO) offers added advantages for patient care including, but not limited to (1) detecting of eosinophilic airway inflammation, (2) determining the likelihood of corticosteroid responsiveness, (3) monitoring of airway inflammation to determine the potential need for corticosteroid, and (4) unmasking of otherwise unsuspected nonadherence to corticosteroid therapy.

Fluctuation phenotyping based on daily fraction of exhaled nitric oxide values in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), a marker of airway inflammation, has been proposed to be useful for asthma management, but conclusions are inconsistent. This might be due to the failure of mean statistics to characterize individual variability in Feno values, which is possibly a better indicator of asthma control than single measurements.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized fractal fluctuations in daily Feno values over time and the relationship between Feno values and symptom scores. We investigated whether these are associated with asthma severity, control, and exacerbation risk.

METHODS

Daily Feno values and symptom scores over 192 days in 41 atopic asthmatic children from the Childhood Asthma Respiratory Inflammatory Status Monitoring study were analyzed. Two methods of time-series analysis were used: detrended fluctuation analysis to quantify fractal patterns in fluctuations in daily Feno values (α value) and cross-correlation to quantify the strength of the relationship between daily Feno values and symptom scores. The associations of α values and cross-correlation with markers of asthma severity and control were assessed by means of regression analysis.

RESULTS

Daily fluctuations in Feno values exhibited fractal-type long-range correlations. Those subjects receiving higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids at study entry had a significantly lower α value, corresponding to more random fluctuations in Feno values in those with greater inhaled corticosteroid need. The cross-correlation between Feno values and symptom scores was significantly higher in those subjects who had exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluctuation in Feno values and their cross-correlation to symptom scores contains information on asthma severity and control. Methods that quantify the complexity of asthma over time might assist in identifying asthmatic subjects with concordance between eosinophilic inflammation and symptoms and thus increased exacerbation risk.

Allergen exposure modifies the relation of sensitization to fraction of exhaled nitric oxide levels in children at risk for allergy and asthma

BACKGROUND

Studies on airway inflammation, measured as fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), have focused on its relation to control of asthma, but the contribution of allergen exposure to the increase in FENO levels is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated (1) whether FENO levels were increased in children with allergic sensitization or asthma; (2) whether specific allergen exposure increased FENO levels in sensitized, but not unsensitized, children; and (3) whether sedentary behavior increased FENO levels independent of allergen exposures.

METHODS

At age 12 years, in a birth cohort of children with a parental history of allergy or asthma, we measured bed dust allergen (dust mite, cat, and cockroach) by means of ELISA, specific allergic sensitization primarily based on specific IgE levels, and respiratory disease (current asthma, rhinitis, and wheeze) and hours of television viewing/video game playing by means of questionnaire. Children performed spirometric maneuvers before and after bronchodilator responses and had FENO levels measured by using electrochemical detection methods (NIOX MINO).

RESULTS

FENO levels were increased in children with current asthma (32.2 ppb), wheeze (27.0 ppb), or rhinitis (23.2 ppb) compared with subjects without these respective symptoms/diagnoses (16.4-16.6 ppb, P < .005 for all comparisons). Allergic sensitization to indoor allergens (cat, dog, and dust mite) predicted higher FENO levels and explained one third of the variability in FENO levels. FENO levels were highest in children both sensitized and exposed to dust mite. Greater than 10 hours of weekday television viewing was associated with a 0.64-log increase in FENO levels after controlling for indoor allergen exposure, body mass index, and allergic sensitization.

CONCLUSION

Allergen exposures and sedentary behavior (television viewing/video game playing) might increase airway inflammation, which was measured as the FENO.

Hand-held nitric oxide sensor NIOX MINO® for the monitoring of respiratory disorders

Measurements of exhaled nitric oxide have been proposed as a tool to improve the control of asthma and inflammatory airways disease, including the patient's response to anti-inflammatory treatment and to predict loss of control and to monitor compliance with treatment. Several techniques have been used to assess exhaled nitric oxide gas and the majority of studies have used the chemiluminescence method. More recently, a new hand-held electrochemical sensor NIOX MINO(®) has been developed. Here, we will review the use of the NIOX MINO for the study of respiratory disorders.

Monitoring asthma control in children with allergies by soft computing of lung function and exhaled nitric oxide

BACKGROUND

Asthma control is emphasized by new guidelines but remains poor in many children. Evaluation of control relies on subjective patient recall and may be overestimated by health-care professionals. This study assessed the value of spirometry and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements, used alone or in combination, in models developed by a machine learning approach in the objective classification of asthma control according to Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines and tested the model in a second group of children with asthma.

METHODS

Fifty-three children with persistent atopic asthma underwent two to six evaluations of asthma control, including spirometry and FeNO. Soft computing evaluation was performed by means of artificial neural networks and principal component analysis. The model was then tested in a cross-sectional study in an additional 77 children with allergic asthma.

RESULTS

The machine learning method was not able to distinguish different levels of control using either spirometry or FeNO values alone. However, their use in combination modeled by soft computing was able to discriminate levels of asthma control. In particular, the model is able to recognize all children with uncontrolled asthma and correctly identify 99.0% of children with totally controlled asthma. In the cross-sectional study, the model prospectively identified correctly all the uncontrolled children and 79.6% of the controlled children.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft computing analysis of spirometry and FeNO allows objective categorization of asthma control status.

Childhood Asthma Control Test and airway inflammation evaluation in asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

The Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has been proposed as a tool in assessing the level of disease control in asthmatic children. To evaluate the position of C-ACT in the clinical management of asthmatic children, in relationship to the level of airway inflammation as assessed by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and with lung function.

METHODS

A total of 200 asthmatic children were included in the study: 47 children with newly diagnosed asthma ('New') and without any regular controller therapy; and 153 children with previously diagnosed asthma, treated according to GINA guidelines, and evaluated during a scheduled follow-up visit ('Follow-up'). Childhood Asthma Control Test, FeNO and lung function [forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)] were evaluated.

RESULTS

In New vs Follow-up participants, C-ACT score (P < 0.001), FVC (P < 0.005) and FEV1 (P < 0.05) were significantly lower, and FeNO (P = 0.011) were significantly higher. In New, but not in Follow-up participants, significant correlations were observed between C-ACT score and FeNO (r = -0.51; P < 0.001), FEV1 (r = 0.34; P = 0.022) and FEV1/FVC (r = 0.32; P = 0.03). This lack of correlation in Follow-up visits seemed attributable to dissociation between inadequately controlled asthma by C-ACT ratings with normalization of other measures such as FeNO levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms and expands the concept that C-ACT is complementary to, but not a substitute for, other markers of disease control in asthmatic children, especially in the context of follow-up visits.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide in asthma: an update

In asthma, clinical symptoms and lung function are insensitive in reflecting the underlying airway inflammation, and monitoring of this process has only recently become available. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Fe(NO)) is now recognized as a reliable surrogate marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation and offers the advantage of being completely non-invasive and very easy to obtain. This review summarizes the clinical use of Fe(NO) in asthma. It covers the relationship between Fe(NO) and the underlying eosinophilic inflammation, the pathophysiology and production of Fe(NO), technical aspects of Fe(NO) measurement and potential confounding factors in interpreting levels. Fe(NO) reference values and the role of Fe(NO) in asthma assessment, diagnosis and management are also discussed.

[Atopic dermatitis aggravates the allergic airways inflammation in acute viral bronchiolitis]

INTRODUCTION

Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a putative non-invasive marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation with a good predictive value for allergic asthma in preschool children. The aim of the present study was to compare FeNO after acute viral bronchiolitis (AVB) in children aged less than 2 years without atopic dermatitis (AD) vs those with atopic dermatitis, as well as children with AD without any history of AVB.

METHODS

Forty-two children (mean age +/- SD: 12.3 +/- 5.2 months; range 5.0-23.5; sex-ratio M: F=1.3: 1) were included in this prospective study, > 8 wks after an episode of AVB. The patients' atopic status was assessed both by clinical phenotype and IgE- mediated response to inhaled and/or food allergens. FeNO (ppb) was measured off-line by the chemoluminescence method on samples obtained from gas collected in a balloon during tidal breathing.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the AVB/AD (23.4 +/- 14.3 ppb, n=15) vs the AVB without AD group (13.5 +/- 10. 1 ppb, n=13) or the AD without AVB group (11.0 +/- 8.3 ppb, n=14). Maternal feeding for more than 2 months decreased FeNO by 50%.

CONCLUSION

Atopic children below 2 years with AD produce more NO after AVB than non-atopic children or atopic children without any history of AVB. Maternal feeding decreases FeNO.

The value of FeNO measurement in asthma management: the motion for Yes, it's NO--or, the wrong end of the Stick!

The utility of measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will likely depend on context, being most helpful in moderate and severe asthma, rather than mild asthmatics and community based studies. Atopy on its own is a cause of elevation in FeNO. Adult and paediatric studies have clearly established that measurement of some aspect of airway inflammation is part of state of the art management of asthma, but it is as yet unclear which of several techniques is most useful. The relationship between FeNO and sputum eosinophils is relatively loose, but this does not preclude it being a useful test in clinical practice. In fact, there are only poor correlations between sputum, proximal mucosal, and distal eosinophils, and the importance of these different compartments is unclear. A low FeNO in the setting of supposedly poorly controlled asthma should cast doubt on the diagnosis. We certainly cannot treat an isolated elevation in FeNO, which may be due to a simple viral cold, or constitutional. If FeNO is elevated, particularly if asthma is uncontrolled, it suggests an imbalance between anti-inflammatory therapy and pro-inflammatory environmental influences. Inadequate anti-inflammatory therapy may be due to the prescribed dose being too low; the drug delivery device not being used correctly; or the medication not being taken. Adverse pro-inflammatory environmental influences driving up FeNO include IgE and non-IgE mediated allergen sensitivity in the home, and even in the child's school. Novel technology allows home monitoring of FeNO, but the role of these devices is less clear. Although more data is needed properly to define the role of FeNO measurements in clinical practice, there is sufficient data already published to conclude that 'inflammometry' is an important part of asthma management at the more severe end of the spectrum, and that FeNO measurements are probably the most useful at the moment.