Rapid effect of inhaled ciclesonide in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Eosinophilic Asthma: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Horizons

Asthma is a prevalent chronic non-communicable disease, affecting approximately 300 million people worldwide. It is characterized by significant airway inflammation, hyperresponsiveness, obstruction, and remodeling. Eosinophilic asthma, a subtype of asthma, involves the accumulation of eosinophils in the airways. These eosinophils release mediators and cytokines, contributing to severe airway inflammation and tissue damage. Emerging evidence suggests that targeting eosinophils could reduce airway remodeling and slow the progression of asthma. To achieve this, it is essential to understand the immunopathology of asthma, identify specific eosinophil-associated biomarkers, and categorize patients more accurately based on the clinical characteristics (phenotypes) and underlying pathobiological mechanisms (endotypes). This review delves into the role of eosinophils in exacerbating severe asthma, exploring various phenotypes and endotypes, as well as biomarkers. It also examines the current and emerging biological agents that target eosinophils in eosinophilic asthma. By focusing on these aspects, both researchers and clinicians can advance the development of targeted therapies to combat eosinophilic pathology in severe asthma.

Effects of inhaled JAK inhibitor GDC-4379 on exhaled nitric oxide and peripheral biomarkers of inflammation

BACKGROUND

Janus Kinases (JAKs) mediate activity of many asthma-relevant cytokines. GDC-0214, an inhaled small molecule JAK1 inhibitor, has previously been shown to reduce fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in patients with mild asthma, but required an excessive number of inhalations.

AIM

To assess whether GDC-4379, a new inhaled JAK inhibitor, reduces FeNO and peripheral biomarkers of inflammation.

METHODS

This study assessed the activity of GDC-4379 in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study in patients with mild asthma. Participants included adults (18-65y) with a diagnosis of asthma for ≥6 months, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁)> 70% predicted, FeNO >40 ppb, using as-needed short-acting beta-agonist medication only. Four sequential, 14-day, ascending-dose cohorts (10 mg QD, 30 mg QD, 40 mg BID, and 80 mg QD) of 12 participants each were randomized 2:1 to GDC-4379 or placebo. The primary activity outcome was percent change from baseline (CFB) in FeNO to Day 14 compared to the pooled placebo group. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers, including blood eosinophils, serum CCL17, and serum CCL18, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 48 enrolled participants, the mean age was 25 years and 54% were female. Median (range) FeNO at baseline was 79 (41-222) ppb. GDC-4379 treatment led to dose-dependent reductions in FeNO. Compared to placebo, mean (95% CI) percent CFB in FeNO to Day 14 was: -6 (-43, 32) at 10 mg QD, -26 (-53, 2) at 30 mg QD, -55 (-78, -32) at 40 mg BID and -52 (-72, -32) at 80 mg QD. Dose-dependent reductions in blood eosinophils and serum CCL17 were also observed. Higher plasma drug concentrations corresponded with greater FeNO reductions. No serious AEs occurred. The majority of AEs were mild to moderate. The most common AEs were headache and oropharyngeal pain. Minor changes in neutrophils were noted at 80 mg QD, but were not considered clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild asthma, 14-day treatment with GDC-4379 reduced FeNO levels and peripheral biomarkers of inflammation. Treatment was well tolerated without any major safety concerns.

AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY

ACTRN12619000227190.

Step-up and step-down approaches in the treatment of asthma

Introduction: Significant intraindividual and temporal variability in symptom control is a feature of asthma that requires careful monitoring and the need to periodically review and adjust therapy. Both NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA offer helpful algorithms for a stepping approach to asthma.Areas covered: The problems arisen in applying the stepwise approach to the treatment of asthma proposed by NHLBI/NAEPP and GINA algorithms and their possible alternatives.Expert opinion: The current therapeutic stepping approach to asthma, which takes into account lung function, symptoms and quality of life, is certainly useful, but it does not consider the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, patient's overestimation or underestimation of the severity of the disease and differences in the opinions on the level of asthma control required between patients and physicians and also between physicians in both primary care and specialist settings are common and may negatively affect asthma control and future risks. A reassessment of the conventional stepping approach to management of asthma is now needed. A pragmatic approach that sets therapeutic goals for each individual and associates them with the treatable traits of asthma which, when therapeutically targeted, will in many cases help to achieve the goals, seems more reasonable than the present stepping approach.

Direct and indirect bronchoprovocation tests in dose-response studies of inhaled corticosteroids: Past, present, and future directions

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are a mainstay of treatment in eosinophilic asthma. Many studies have explored the dose-response effect of different formulations of ICS through direct or indirect bronchoprovocation testing. Such studies are important for investigating efficacy and identifying the relative potency between formulations. However, lack of consistency in methods and designs has hindered the comparability of study findings. This review discusses current knowledge of the dose-response, or lack thereof, of different formulations of ICS through direct and indirect bronchoprovocation testing. The strengths and weaknesses of past studies inform recommendations for future methodological considerations in this field, such as utilizing a randomized double-blind crossover design, enrolling participants likely to respond to ICS therapy, and carefully selecting treatment durations and washout periods to assess incremental improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness while reducing the likelihood of a carryover effect.

Inhaled JAK inhibitor GDC-0214 reduces exhaled nitric oxide in patients with mild asthma: A randomized, controlled, proof-of-activity trial

BACKGROUND

The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway mediates the activity of many asthma-relevant cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-13. GDC-0214 is a potent, inhaled, small-molecule JAK inhibitor being developed for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether GDC-0214 reduces fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), a JAK1-dependent biomarker of airway inflammation, in patients with mild asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 proof-of-activity study in adults with mild asthma and Feno higher than 40 parts per billion (ppb). Subjects were randomized 2:1 (GDC-0214:placebo) into 4 sequential ascending-dose cohorts (1 mg once daily [QD], 4 mg QD, 15 mg QD, or 15 mg twice daily). All subjects received 4 days of blinded placebo, then 10 days of either active drug or placebo. The primary outcome was placebo-corrected percent reduction in Feno from baseline to day 14. Baseline was defined as the average Feno during the blinded placebo period. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (mean age, 28 years; 54% females) were enrolled. Mean Feno at baseline across all subjects was 93 ± 43 ppb. At day 14, placebo-corrected difference in Feno was -23% (95% CI, -37.3 to -9) for 15 mg QD and -42% (95% CI, -57 to -27.4) for 15 mg twice daily. Higher plasma exposure was associated with greater Feno reduction. No dose-limiting adverse events, serious adverse events, or treatment discontinuations occurred. There were no major imbalances in adverse events or laboratory findings, or evidence of systemic JAK inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

GDC-0214, an inhaled JAK inhibitor, caused dose-dependent reductions in Feno in mild asthma and was well tolerated without evidence of systemic toxicity.

Implications of Glycopeptide and Lipopeptide Antibiotics on Asthma Exacerbations in a Patient With Hyper-IgE Syndrome and Chronic Severe Asthma: A Case Report

Objective: To review and consider the immunomodulatory ramifications of glycopeptide and lipopeptide antibiotics in a patient with severe asthma, hyper-immunoglobulin E (IgE) syndrome, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Case Summary: A 36-year-old male patient with a pertinent past medical history of hyper-IgE syndrome, severe asthma, and osteonecrosis of the jaw attributed to steroid use initially presented to the emergency department, where imaging of the jaw suggested an infectious process. Following months of vancomycin therapy as an outpatient, the patient was switched to daptomycin to facilitate once-daily infusions. Following this change, the patient experienced significantly less asthma exacerbations and fewer admissions to the hospital for asthma-related issues. Discussion: Though daptomycin is associated with eosinophilia, and this patient’s eosinophil counts did increase while on the drug, an inverse relationship developed concerning the number of hospital admissions for asthma exacerbations. A review of the literature indicates that select glycopeptides, such as vancomycin, have pro-inflammatory effects, while other related drugs, such as the lipopeptide daptomycin, may not result in clinical manifestations of an inflammatory process. Tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6 have been implicated in this process. This patient may have been particularly susceptible to the effects of the glycopeptides due to his diagnosis of hyper-IgE syndrome, which has been independently associated with reactive airway diseases. Conclusion: Cytokine migration and activation by select glycopeptide and lipopeptide antibiotics warrant consideration from clinicians when determining the most appropriate treatment regimens. Further research is required to elucidate whether the pro-inflammatory properties of vancomycin warrant a change in first-line therapy to daptomycin in select cases.

Onset of action of inhaled glucocorticoids on bronchial and alveolar nitric oxide output

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) is a marker of airway inflammation. Measuring F_ENO at multiple flow rates enables calculation of NO parameters: bronchial NO output (J _awNO), bronchial wall (C _awNO) and alveolar (C _ANO) NO concentrations, and bronchial diffusion factor of NO (D _awNO). F_ENO is known to rapidly reduce after the commencement of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment. However, little is known on the effect of ICS on the other NO parameters. We assessed (1) the onset of action of ICS treatment on the NO parameters and (2) whether the changes in bronchial NO output are due to changes in bronchial wall NO concentration or diffusion factor. F_ENO and other NO parameters were measured at baseline and after 1, 3 and 7 d of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate 250 μg b.i.d. in 23 allergic children with a history of asthma-like symptoms. There was a decrease in J _awNO (from 680 (244/1791) (median (1st/3rd quartile)) to 357 (165/753) pl s^-1, p < 0.001) and F_ENO₅₀( from 13.8 (7.5/35) to 8.3 (5.36/17.0) ppb, p < 0.001) in 3 d from the first dose of ICS. Also, C _awNO seemed to reduce after 3 d (from 171 (89/328) to 79 (54/157) ppb, p = 0.041), while D _awNO remained unchanged. Furthermore, C _ANO reduced during the 7 d treatment (from 3.0 (2.0/5.0) to 2.3 (1.9/2.6) ppb, p = 0.004). ICS treatment reduced F_ENO₅₀ and J _awNO rapidly and the decline was caused by decreased bronchial wall NO concentration while bronchial NO diffusion factor remained unchanged. These findings suggest that C _awNO could be a more specific marker of airway inflammation and treatment response than J _awNO or F_ENO₅₀, which are both determined also by D _awNO that seems to be resistant to the treatment with ICS.

Airway mechanical compression: its role in asthma pathogenesis and progression

The lung is a mechanically active organ, but uncontrolled or excessive mechanical forces disrupt normal lung function and can contribute to the development of disease. In asthma, bronchoconstriction leads to airway narrowing and airway wall buckling. A growing body of evidence suggests that pathological mechanical forces induced by airway buckling alone can perpetuate disease processes in asthma. Here, we review the data obtained from a variety of experimental models, including in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo approaches, which have been used to study the impact of mechanical forces in asthma pathogenesis. We review the evidence showing that mechanical compression alters the biological and biophysical properties of the airway epithelium, including activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway, overproduction of asthma-associated mediators, goblet cell hyperplasia, and a phase transition of epithelium from a static jammed phase to a mobile unjammed phase. We also define questions regarding the impact of mechanical forces on the pathology of asthma, with a focus on known triggers of asthma exacerbations such as viral infection.

Distinct functions of eosinophils in severe asthma with type 2 phenotype: clinical implications

Asthma is commonly recognized as a heterogeneous condition with a complex pathophysiology. With advances in the development of multiple medications for patients with asthma, most asthma symptoms are well managed. Nevertheless, 5% to 10% of adult asthmatic patients (called severe asthma) are in uncontrolled or partially controlled status despite intensive treatment. Especially, severe eosinophilic asthma is one of the severe asthma phenotypes characterized by eosinophilia in sputum/blood driven by type 2 immune responses. Eosinophils have been widely accepted as a central effector cell in the lungs. Some evidence has demonstrated that persistent eosinophilia in upper and lower airway mucosa contributes to asthma severity by producing various mediators including cytokines, chemokines and granule proteins. Moreover, extracellular traps released from eosinophils have been revealed to enhance type 2 inflammation in patients with severe asthma. These novel molecules have the ability to induce airway inf lammation and hyperresponsiveness through enhancing innate and type 2 immune responses. In this review, we highlight recent insight into the function of eosinophil extracellular traps in patients with severe asthma. In addition, the role of eosinophil extracellular vesicles in severe asthma is also proposed. Finally, current biologics are suggested as a potential strategy for effective management of severe eosinophilic asthma.

Loss of bronchoprotection with ICS plus LABA treatment, β-receptor dynamics, and the effect of alendronate

BACKGROUND

Loss of bronchoprotection (LOBP) with a regularly used long-acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) is well documented. LOBP has been attributed to β2-adrenergic receptor (B2AR) downregulation, a process requiring farnesylation, which is inhibited by alendronate.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether alendronate can reduce LABA-associated LOBP in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-treated patients.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, proof-of-concept trial. Seventy-eight participants with persistent asthma receiving 250 μg of fluticasone twice daily for 2 weeks were randomized to receive alendronate or placebo while initiating salmeterol for 8 weeks. Salmeterol-protected methacholine challenges (SPMChs) and PBMC B2AR numbers (radioligand binding assay) and signaling (cyclic AMP ELISA) were assessed before randomization and after 8 weeks of ICS plus LABA treatment. LOBP was defined as a more than 1 doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value.

RESULTS

The mean doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value was 0.50 and 0.27 with alendronate and placebo, respectively (P = .62). Thirty-eight percent of participants receiving alendronate and 33% receiving placebo had LOBP (P = .81). The after/before ICS plus LABA treatment ratio of B2AR number was 1.0 for alendronate (P = .86) and 0.8 for placebo (P = .15; P = .31 for difference between treatments). The B2AR signaling ratio was 0.89 for alendronate (P = .43) and 1.02 for placebo (P = .84; P = .44 for difference). Changes in lung function and B2AR number and signaling were similar between those who did and did not experience LOBP.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find evidence that alendronate reduces LABA-associated LOBP, which relates to the occurrence of LOBP in only one third of participants. LOBP appears to be less common than presumed in concomitant ICS plus LABA-treated asthmatic patients. B2AR downregulation measured in PBMCs does not appear to reflect LOBP.

Anti-inflammatory duration of action of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol trifenatate in asthma: a cross-over randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol trifenatate (FF/VI) is an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combination with a prolonged bronchodilator duration of action. We characterised the time-course of onset and offset of airway anti-inflammatory action of FF/VI, as assessed by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and compared this to the bronchodilator duration of action.

METHODS

A single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study was undertaken in 28 steroid-naïve adults with asthma. Participants with an FEV1 ≥ 60% predicted, reversible airway disease, and FeNO > 40 ppb received FF/VI 100/25 mcg or placebo once daily for 14 days. FeNO and peak expiratory flow were measured twice-daily during treatment and during a 21-day washout period. FEV1 was measured for five days from treatment cessation. The primary outcome measure was FeNO change from baseline ratio for 21 days following treatment cessation.

RESULTS

In the 27 subjects who completed the study, median (range) baseline FeNO was 87 ppb (42-212). FF/VI 100/25 mcg reduced FeNO by day 3, ratio FF/VI versus placebo 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.86) with the maximum reduction occurring at day 14, 0.32 (0.27-0.37). Following cessation of treatment FeNO remained suppressed for 18 days, ratio on day 18 0.77 (0.59-1.00), whereas improvements in FEV1 and peak flow were maintained for 3 to 4 days post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-inflammatory duration of action of FF/VI is consistent with the high glucocorticoid receptor affinity and long lung retention of fluticasone furoate. The anti-inflammatory effect of FF/VI was of greater duration than its bronchodilator effect in adults with mild asthma. Funding GlaxoSmithKline (201499).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov registry number NCT02712047 .

Glucocorticosteroids

Glucocorticosteroids are the most effective anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma but are relatively ineffective in COPD. Glucocorticoids are broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory drugs that suppress inflammation via several molecular mechanisms. Glucocorticoids suppress the multiple inflammatory genes that are activated in asthma by reversing histone acetylation of activated inflammatory genes through binding of ligand-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GR) to coactivator molecules and recruitment of histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) to the activated inflammatory gene transcription complex (trans-repression). At higher concentrations of glucocorticoids GR homodimers interact with DNA recognition sites to activate transcription through increased histone acetylation of anti-inflammatory genes and transcription of several genes linked to glucocorticoid side effects (trans-activation). Glucocorticoids also have post-transcriptional effects and decrease stability of some proinflammatory mRNAs. Decreased glucocorticoid responsiveness is found in patients with severe asthma and asthmatics who smoke, as well as in all patients with COPD. Several molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance have now been identified which involve phosphorylation and other post-translational modifications of GR. HDAC2 is markedly reduced in activity and expression as a result of oxidative/nitrative stress and pi3 kinase-δ inhibition, so that inflammation is resistant to the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids. Dissociated glucocorticoids and selective GR modulators which show improved trans-repression over trans-activation effects have been developed to reduce side effects, but so far it has been difficult to dissociate anti-inflammatory effects from adverse effects. In patients with glucocorticoid resistance alternative anti-inflammatory treatments are being investigated as well as drugs that may reverse the molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance.

Association between fraction of exhaled nitrous oxide, bronchodilator response and inhaled corticosteroid type

BACKGROUND

Fraction of exhaled nitrous oxide (FeNO) is a known marker of airway inflammation and a topic of recent investigation for asthma control in children.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship among FeNO and bronchodilator response measured by spirometry and types of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

METHODS

A one-year review of children tested with spirometry and FeNO in a regional pediatric asthma centre was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 183 children were included (mean [± SD] age 12.8 ± 2.8 years). Fluticasone was used most commonly (n=66 [36.1%]), followed by ciclesonide (n=50 [27.3%]). Most children (n=73 [39.9%]) had moderate persistent asthma. Increased FeNO was associated with percent change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after bronchodilator adjusted for allergic rhinitis, parental smoking and ICS type (B=0.08 [95% CI 0.04 to 0.12]; P<0.001). Similarly, FeNO was associated with percent change in forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the pulmonary volume (FEF25-75) after bronchodilator adjusted for parental smoking and ICS type (B=0.13 [95% CI 0.01 to 0.24]; P=0.03). FeNO accounted for only 16% and 9% of the variability in FEV1 and FEF25-75, respectively. Mean-adjusted FeNO was lowest in fluticasone users compared with no ICS (mean difference 18.6 parts per billion [ppb] [95% CI 1.0 to 36.2]) and there was no difference in adjusted FeNO level between ciclesonide and no ICS (5.9 ppb [95% CI -9.0 to 20.8]).

CONCLUSION

FeNO levels correlated with bronchodilator response in a regional pediatric asthma centre. However, FeNO accounted for only 16% and 9% of the variability in FEV1 and FEF25-75, respectively. Mean adjusted FeNO varied according to ICS type, suggesting a difference in relative efficacy between ICS beyond their dose equivalents.

Variability of methacholine bronchoprovocation and the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in mild asthma

BACKGROUND

The methacholine challenge test quantifies airway hyper-responsiveness, which is measured by the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in forced expiration volume in 1 second (PC20). The dose-response effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on PC20 has been inconsistent and within-patient variability of PC20 is not well established.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of high- vs low-dose ICS on PC20 and within-patient variability in those with repeated measurements of PC20.

METHODS

A randomized, double-masked, crossover trial was conducted in patients with asthma on controller medications with PC20 of 8 mg/mL or lower (n = 64) to evaluate the effect of high-dose (1,000 μg/d) vs low-dose (250 μg/d) fluticasone for 4 weeks on PC20. In addition, the variability of PC20 was assessed in participants who underwent 2 or 3 PC20 measurements on the same dose of ICS (n = 27) over a 4-week interval.

RESULTS

Because there was a significant period effect, dose comparison of the change in PC20 was assessed in the first treatment period. There was no significant difference in the change in PC20 for high- vs low-dose ICS (39% vs 30% increase, respectively; P = .87). The within- and between-participant variances for log PC20 were 0.84 and 0.96, respectively, with an intra-class correlation of 0.53, and 37% of participants had more than 2 doubling dose changes in PC20 in those with repeated measurements.

CONCLUSION

The effect of ICS on PC20 is not dose dependent at fluticasone levels of 250 and 1,000 μg/d. Interpersonal variability for PC20 is large. A lack of precise measurements should be taken into account when interpreting any change in PC20.

Cytokines: monitors of disease severity for the clinic

BACKGROUND

Cytokines communicate between the cells of the immune system and its targets to maintain homeostasis after injury or pathogenic events. They are involved in almost any pathological situation imaginable.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the importance of cytokines as biomarkers in current preclinical (aetiopathogenic, development of new therapies) and clinical studies (diagnosis, disease severity, prognosis and response to therapy).

METHOD/RESULTS

A Medline search with the query 'cytokine' AND 'biomarker' AND a variable for a variety of biomedical fields, followed by deeper-level searches, demonstrated the immense popularity of cytokines as biomarkers in almost any biomedical field.

CONCLUSION

As cytokines are not disease-specific they do not serve as single diagnostic biomarkers. The strength of the cytokines resides in monitoring disease severity, prognosis and response to treatment.

Ciclesonide versus other inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of asthma maintenance treatment in children. Particularly among parents, there is concern about the safety of ICS as studies in children have shown reduced growth. Small-particle-size ICS targeting the smaller airways have improved lung deposition and effective asthma control might be achieved at lower daily doses.Ciclesonide is a relatively new ICS. This small-particle ICS is a pro-drug that is converted in the airways to an active metabolite and therefore with potentially less local (throat infection) and systemic (reduced growth) side effects. It can be inhaled once daily, thereby possibly improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of ciclesonide compared to other ICS in the management of chronic asthma in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Register of trials with pre-defined terms. Additional searches of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE and Clinical study results.org were undertaken. Searches are up to date to 7 November 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled parallel or cross-over studies were eligible for the review. We included studies comparing ciclesonide with other corticosteroids both at nominally equivalent doses or lower doses of ciclesonide.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies were included in this review (3256 children, 4 to 17 years of age). Two studies were published as conference abstracts only. Ciclesonide was compared to budesonide and fluticasone.Ciclesonide compared to budesonide (dose ratio 1:2): asthma symptoms and adverse effect were similar in both groups. Pooled results showed no significant difference in children who experience an exacerbation (risk ratio (RR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 6.43). Both studies reported that 24-hour urine cortisol levels showed a statistically significant decrease in the budesonide group compared to the ciclesonide group.Ciclesonide compared to fluticasone (dose ratio 1:1): no significant differences were found for the outcome asthma symptoms. Pooled results showed no significant differences in number of patients with exacerbations (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.21) and data from a study that could not be pooled in the meta-analysis reported similar numbers of patients with exacerbations in both groups. None of the studies found a difference in adverse effects. No significant difference was found for 24-hour urine cortisol levels between the groups (mean difference 0.54 nmol/mmol, 95% CI -5.92 to 7.00).Ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:2) was assessed in one study and showed similar results between the two corticosteroids for asthma symptoms. The number of children with exacerbations was significantly higher in the ciclesonide group (RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.35 to 9.47). No significant differences were found in adverse effects (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.14) and 24-hour urine cortisol levels (mean difference 1.15 nmol/mmol, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.23).The quality of evidence was judged 'low' for the outcomes asthma symptoms and adverse events and 'very low' for the outcome exacerbations for ciclesonide versus budesonide (dose ratio 1:1). The quality of evidence was graded 'moderate' for the outcome asthma symptoms, 'very low' for the outcome exacerbations and 'low' for the outcome adverse events for ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:1). For ciclesonide versus fluticasone (dose ratio 1:2) the quality was rated 'low' for the outcome asthma symptoms and 'very low' for exacerbations and adverse events (dose ratio 1:2).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in asthma symptoms, exacerbations and side effects of ciclesonide versus budesonide and fluticasone could be neither demonstrated nor refuted and the trade-off between benefits and harms of using ciclesonide instead of budesonide or fluticasone is unclear. The resource use or costs of different ICS should therefore also be considered in final decision making. Longer-term superiority trials are needed to identify the usefulness and safety of ciclesonide compared to other ICS. Additionally these studies should be powered for patient relevant outcomes (exacerbations, asthma symptoms, quality of life and side effects). There is a need for studies comparing ciclesonide once daily with other ICS twice daily to assess the advantages of ciclesonide being a pro-drug that can be administered once daily with possibly increased adherence leading to increased control of asthma and fewer side effects.

Severe asthma: advances in current management and future therapy

Effective treatment of severe asthma is a major unmet need because patients' symptoms are not controlled on maximum treatment with inhaled therapy. Asthma symptoms can be poorly controlled because of poor adherence to controller therapy, and this might be addressed by using combination inhalers that contain a corticosteroid and long-acting β(2)-agonist as reliever therapy in addition to maintenance treatment. New bronchodilators with a longer duration of action are in development, and recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of a long-acting anticholinergic bronchodilator in addition to β(2)-agonists in patients with severe asthma. Anti-IgE therapy is beneficial in selected patients with severe asthma. Several new blockers of specific mediators, including prostaglandin D(2), IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, are also in clinical trials and might benefit patients with subtypes of severe asthma. Several broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory therapies that target neutrophilic inflammation are in clinical development for the treatment of severe asthma, but adverse effects after oral administration might necessitate inhaled delivery. Macrolides might benefit some patients with infection by atypical bacteria, but recent results are not encouraging, although there could be an effect in patients with predominant neutrophilic asthma. Corticosteroid resistance is a major problem in patients with severe asthma, and several molecular mechanisms have been described that might lead to novel therapeutic approaches, including drugs that could reverse this resistance, such as theophylline and nortriptyline. In selected patients with severe asthma, bronchial thermoplasty might be beneficial, but thus far, clinical studies have not been encouraging. Finally, several subtypes of severe asthma are now recognized, and in the future, it will be necessary to find biomarkers that predict responses to specific forms of therapy.

Biomarkers of therapy responsiveness in asthma: pitfalls and promises

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. There is a large inter-individual variability in response to asthma treatment. Most patients respond well to standard therapy; however, a small proportion of the patients remain symptomatic despite treatment with high dosages of corticosteroids. Uncontrolled asthma leads to a decreased quality of life. Therefore, it is important to identify individuals who will respond poorly to standard asthma medication, especially to standard maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, at an early stage. Response to anti-inflammatory therapy is generally monitored by the assessment of clinical symptoms, which only partially correlates with underlying airway inflammation. The identification of specific inflammatory biomarkers might help to guide treatment or predict a corticosteroid response more accurately. Some inflammatory biomarkers are already finding their way into clinical practice (e.g. fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled breath), whereas others are predominantly used as a research tool (e.g. profiles of volatile organic compounds). Currently, there is no inflammatory biomarker used in routine clinical practice to predict a corticosteroid response. More knowledge on the underlying biological mechanism(s) of heterogeneous therapeutic responses could help to identify novel biomarkers. This review will focus on inflammatory patterns and genetic variations that may underlie differences in treatment response in patients with asthma, and will provide an overview of inflammatory biomarkers that could potentially serve as response predictors.

The effect of beclomethasone dipropionate in ultrafine particles on bronchial hyper-reactivity in young children

AIM

Bronchial hyper-reactivity (BHR) provides a tool for asthma diagnosis, assessment of severity and response to treatment. The effect of beclomethasone dipropionate in ultrafine particles (BDP-HFA) on BHR as measured by the adenosine challenge test in young children has not yet been determined. Our aim was to determine the effect of BDP-HFA (100 μg twice daily) on BHR as evaluated by a reduction of 20% from baseline FEV1 (PC20-FEV1) values in young asthmatic children.

METHODS

Twenty-one young children (13 males), mean age 4.95 ± 1.05 years, with partially controlled or controlled asthma completed a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Each child received 4 weeks of treatment with either 100 μg BDP-HFA twice daily or placebo, and after a 2-week washout period the other way around. Primary outcomes were PC20-FEV1 concentration, and the stage number at which FEV1 values dropped by 20%.

RESULTS

Following 4 weeks of treatment, median PC20-FEV1 was 81.28 mg/mL while on BDP-HFA, compared with 9.64 mg/mL on placebo (p < 0.001). The median increase in stages required to achieve PC20 on BDP-HFA compared with placebo was three (95% CI 2.28-4.86).

CONCLUSION

Four weeks of treatment with BDP-HFA resulted in significantly decreased BHR in young children.

Rapid effects of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination inhaler on airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction in asthma: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of a recent fixed combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F) were investigated using non-invasive markers of inflammation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) provocative challenge. The aim was to assess the onset of the anti-inflammatory action of low and high doses and evaluate the suitability of non-invasive assessments to demonstrate dose response.

METHODS

Steroid naïve adult out-patients with mild asthma, sensitive to AMP with baseline exhaled NO > 25 parts per billion entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way, cross-over study. Patients were randomised to low dose (1 actuation) or high dose (4 actuations) extrafine BDP/F 100/6 μg, or placebo administered twice daily on Days 1 and 2 and once in the morning on Day 3 of each period. Exhaled NO was measured pre-dose on Day 1, then 2 and 4 hours post-administration on Day 3. The AMP challenge was performed 4 hours post-administration on Day 3 and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1, L) was measured from 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1. Endpoints were NO at 2 and 4 hours, AMP challenge at 4 hours after the fifth dose on Day 3 and FEV1 area under the curve from 0 to 4 h post-dose on Day 1. Analysis of covariance was performed for NO and FEV1 and analysis of variance for AMP challenge.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were randomised and completed the study. Exhaled NO was significantly lower for both doses of extrafine BDP/F versus placebo at 2 and 4 hours (high dose LS mean difference: -22.5 ppb, p < 0.0001 and -20.5 ppb, p < 0.0001; low dose: -14.1 ppb, p = 0.0006 and -12.1 ppb, p = 0.0043) with a significant dose response (p = 0.0342 and p = 0.0423). Likewise, AMP challenge revealed statistically significant differences between both doses of extrafine BDP/F and placebo (high dose LS mean difference: 4.8 mg/mL, p < 0.0001; low dose: 3.7 mg/mL, p < 0.0001), and a significant dose response (p = 0.0185). FEV1 was significantly improved versus placebo for both doses (high dose LS mean difference: 0.2 L, p = 0.0001; low dose: 0.2 L p = 0.0001), but without a significant dose response.

CONCLUSIONS

The fixed combination inhaler of extrafine BDP/F has early dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects with a rapid onset of bronchodilatation in mild asthmatic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01343745.

Profile of ciclesonide for the maintenance treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated synthetic inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of all severities of persistent asthma. It is available as a hydrofluroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler in two strengths, 80 mcg/activation and 160 mcg/activation, with the recommenced dosage being two inhalations twice-daily. It is a prodrug that is converted in the lung to its active form, which possesses 100-fold greater glucocorticoid-receptor-binding affinity than the parent compound. Its relative receptor affinity is similar to budesonide. In clinical studies, ciclesonide was effective in improving pulmonary function, reducing asthma symptoms, and reducing or eliminating the need for oral corticosteroids (OCSs). Patients with severe asthma dependent on OCSs and high doses of ICSs were able to achieve greater asthma control and reduce or even eliminate the use of OCSs when switched to ciclesonide. In comparison with fluticasone propionate and budesonide, ciclesonide was demonstrated to be at least as effective in maintaining pulmonary function and asthma control. In clinical trials, ciclesonide was well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events considered mild or moderate in intensity. It had low systemic bioavailability and no clinically significant hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis suppression at therapeutic doses. Its safety profile establishes ciclesonide as an important addition to the currently available ICSs.

Glucocorticosteroids: current and future directions

Glucocorticoids are the most effective anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma yet are relatively ineffective in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Glucocorticoids suppress inflammation via several molecular mechanisms. Glucocorticoids suppress the multiple inflammatory genes that are activated in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma, by reversing histone acetylation of activated inflammatory genes through binding of ligand-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GR) to co-activator molecules and recruitment of histone deacetylase-2 to the activated inflammatory gene transcription complex (trans-repression). At higher concentrations of glucocorticoids GR homodimers interact with DNA recognition sites to activate transcription through increased histone acetylation of anti-inflammatory genes and transcription of several genes linked to glucocorticoid side effects (trans-activation). Glucocorticoids also have post-transcriptional effects and decrease stability of some pro-inflammatory mRNA species. Decreased glucocorticoid responsiveness is found in patients with severe asthma and asthmatics who smoke, as well as in all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Several molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance have now been identified which involve post-translational modifications of GR. Histone deacetylase-2 is markedly reduced in activity and expression as a result of oxidative/nitrative stress so that inflammation becomes resistant to the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids. Dissociated glucocorticoids and selective GR modulators which show improved trans-repression over trans-activation effects have been developed to reduce side effects, but so far it has been difficult to dissociate anti-inflammatory effects from adverse effects. In patients with glucocorticoid resistance alternative anti-inflammatory treatments are being investigated as well as drugs that may reverse the molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance.

Prolonged protection of the new inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate against AMP hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma

INTRODUCTION

Single-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) induce direct anti-inflammatory effects in asthma thereby improving airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). A novel enhanced-affinity ICS, fluticasone furoate (FF), demonstrated a prolonged duration of action in vitro. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and duration of action of a single dose of FF by studying protection against AHR to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and effects on exhaled nitric oxide (eNO).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-way crossover study (FFA10026) was performed in 24 patients with allergic asthma (mean age 32.8 years, FEV(1) ≥ 70% predicted and PC(20) AMP ≤ 50 mg/ml). Each subject received a single dose of FF 1000 μg, fluticasone proprionate (FP) 1000 μg, or placebo at 2 (FF only), 14 or 26 h prior to AMP challenge and eNO measurement.

RESULTS

FF significantly improved PC(20) AMP compared to placebo, the difference in doubling concentrations being 2.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-3.23), 1.54 (0.48-2.59), and 1.30 (0.26-2.34) at 2, 14 and 26 h. FP improved PC(20) AMP significantly at 14 h compared to placebo, but not at the 26-hour time point, the difference in doubling concentrations being 1.72 (0.70-2.75) and 0.33 (-0.69-1.34). There was no significant effect on eNO after either FF or FP at all time points. FF was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The new inhaled corticosteroid FF, but not FP, demonstrates prolonged protection up to 26 h against AHR to AMP in asthma patients.

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor-mediated IL-6 and CC/CXC chemokines expression in human airway smooth muscle cells: role of MAPKs (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK) and STAT3 pathways

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) plays a pivotal role in allergic diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atopic dermatitis. Enhanced TSLP expression has been detected in asthmatic airways that correlated with both the expression of Th2-attracting chemokines and with disease severity. Although cumulative evidence suggests that human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells can initiate or perpetuate the airway inflammation by secreting a variety of inflammatory cell products such as cytokines and chemokines, the role of TSLP in this pathway is not known. In the current study, we sought to investigate whether HASM cells express the TSLP receptor (TSLPR) and whether it is functional. We first demonstrated that primary HASM cells express the transcript and protein of both TSLPR subunits (TSLPR and IL-7Ralpha). Functionally, TSLPR-mediated HASM activation induced a significant increase in CXC (IL-8/CXCL8), CC (eotaxin-1/CCL11) chemokines, and proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 expression. Furthermore, using biochemical and genetic approaches, we found that TSLP-induced proinflammatory gene expression in HASM involved the transcriptional mechanisms, MAPKs (ERK1/2, p38, and JNK), and STAT3 activation. Finally, TSLPR immunoreactivity in bronchial sections from mild allergic asthmatics suggested the potential in vivo TSLP targeting of HASM. Altogether, our data suggest that the TSLPR-mediated HASM activation induces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokines release that may facilitate inflammatory immune cells recruitment in airways. In addition, it may be inferred that TSLPR is involved in the pathogenesis of allergic asthma through the activation of HASM cells by TSLP.

Acute effects of beclomethasone on hyperpnea-induced bronchoconstriction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess whether a single high dose of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) could blunt mast cell activation and bronchoconstriction after eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH).

METHODS

In this model of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), seven athletes with EIB and eight untrained subjects with mild asthma performed two EVH tests 5.5 h apart on the same day; the first challenge after inhalation of a placebo aerosol and the second 4 h after inhalation of BDP (1500 microg). Prechallenge and postchallenge pulmonary function and urinary excretion of the mast cell mediator 9alpha, 11beta-prostaglandin (PG) F2 were followed, as well as urinary excretion of the bronchoconstrictor leukotriene (LT) E4.

RESULTS

The EVH-induced bronchoconstriction was inhibited by BDP in both groups (P < 0.001): in athletes, mean +/- SEM percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 22% +/- 4% after placebo versus 13% +/- 3% after BDP; in subjects with asthma, 23% +/- 4% after placebo versus 14 +/- 3% after BDP. This inhibition of airway response was associated with a significant reduction in the urinary excretion of 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (P = 0.039) and LTE4 (P = 0.003) in both groups. Significant correlations were found between the percent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and the increase in urinary excretion of both mediators 9alpha,11beta-PGF2 (r = 0.544, P = 0.002) and LTE4 (r = 0.380, P = 0.038) after EVH.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a single dose of BDP has an acute protective effect on the bronchial response to hyperpnea in both untrained subjects with asthma and athletes with EIB. This effect was associated with decreased excretion of urinary mediators, suggesting that BDP blunted the mast cell activation.

Inhaled Corticosteroids

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective controllers of asthma. They suppress inflammation mainly by switching off multiple activated inflammatory genes through reversing histone acetylation via the recruitment of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2). Through suppression of airway inflammation ICS reduce airway hyperresponsiveness and control asthma symptoms. ICS are now first-line therapy for all patients with persistent asthma, controlling asthma symptoms and preventing exacerbations. Inhaled long-acting β₂-agonists added to ICS further improve asthma control and are commonly given as combination inhalers, which improve compliance and control asthma at lower doses of corticosteroids. By contrast, ICS provide much less clinical benefit in COPD and the inflammation is resistant to the action of corticosteroids. This appears to be due to a reduction in HDAC2 activity and expression as a result of oxidative stress. ICS are added to bronchodilators in patients with severe COPD to reduce exacerbations. ICS, which are absorbed from the lungs into the systemic circulation, have negligible systemic side effects at the doses most patients require, although the high doses used in COPD has some systemic side effects and increases the risk of developing pneumonia.

Exhaled nitric oxide in pediatric asthma

Exhaled nitric oxide can now be measured in a clinical setting as a noninvasive, reproducible, facile, point-of-service test to measure airway inflammation, a central component of asthma that had not been assessed previously. An excellent surrogate marker of steroid-responsive eosinophilic airway inflammation, it serves to identify steroid-sensitive asthmatic patients and enables clinical monitoring of the response to steroid therapy and titration of the dose. Standardization of methodology and technological advances, such as the recent availability of handheld analyzers, individualized patient cards to store serial test measurements, and the assignment of coding procedural terminology, make this a necessary adjunct to clinical and functional assessment of airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in ambulatory pediatric and adult asthma practices.

Rescue treatment in asthma. More than as-needed bronchodilation

International guidelines recommend the use of rapid-onset inhaled beta(2)-agonists alone for symptom relief in all asthmatic patients. However, recent clinical trials have shown that the "as-required," or PRN, use of inhaled combinations of a corticosteroid and a rapid-onset beta(2)-agonist provides clinical advantages over the traditional PRN inhaled rapid-onset beta(2)-agonists alone in patients with different degrees of asthma severity. Asthma symptoms are associated not only with bronchoconstriction but also with increased airway inflammation. Inhaled beta(2)-agonists have a rapid onset of bronchodilator action that is mainly mediated by a relaxing effect on airway smooth muscle. Inhaled corticosteroids also have rapid clinical effects that can suppress lower airway inflammation, and there is a rapid synergistic potentiation of the antiinflammatory effect of corticosteroids and of the bronchodilatory action of beta(2)-agonists when the two drugs are given simultaneously. On the basis of this emerging evidence, we propose that the current rescue use of rapid-onset inhaled beta(2)-agonists alone should now be replaced by an inhaled rapid-acting beta(2)-agonist combined with a corticosteroid as preferred PRN strategy. We conclude with a call for clinical trials aimed to test the superiority of this approach in all degrees of asthma severity in a real-world setting in addition to any of the regular treatments recommended by international guidelines. In the future it might even be possible to control asthma entirely with PRN combination inhalers without maintenance therapy, at least in patients with less severe disease.

The cytokine network in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are very common inflammatory diseases of the airways. They both cause airway narrowing and are increasing in incidence throughout the world, imposing enormous burdens on health care. Cytokines play a key role in orchestrating the chronic inflammation and structural changes of the respiratory tract in both asthma and COPD and have become important targets for the development of new therapeutic strategies in these diseases.