Evaluation of transesophageal echocardiography as a diagnostic and therapeutic aid in a critical care setting

Transesophageal echocardiography-associated gastrointestinal injuries: systematic review and pooled rates of gastrointestinal injuries

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) injuries are associated with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) complications. We reviewed rates and various types of complications with GI injuries. A comprehensive literature search using five databases was conducted. Pooled rates were calculated for overall injuries, pooled GI complications, lacerations, and perforations with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 26 studies involving 55,319 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of adverse events was 0.51% (95% CI 0.3% to 0.7%). Bleeding was the most commonly reported adverse event, followed by dysphagia and lacerations. The highest rate of adverse events was observed in liver transplant patients (1.35%), followed by critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (1.1%), hospitalized patients (1.1%), patients undergoing intraoperative TEE (0.7%), and those undergoing cardiac procedures (0.67%). The pooled complication rate for bleeding was 0.17% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.3%), while odynophagia/dysphagia had a rate of 0.27% (95% CI -0.1% to 0.5%) and lacerations had a rate of 0.12% (95% CI -0.1% to 0.5%). A subgroup analysis comparing variceal and nonvariceal cohorts from three studies showed no significant difference in bleeding rates. Our study findings showed a low risk of esophageal injury in patients undergoing TEE.

Transesophageal Echocardiography vs. Transthoracic Echocardiography for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is an infection of the inner layers of the heart, seen often in intravenous drug users and patients with valvular lesions or prosthetic heart valves. This entity has high mortality and morbidity. The most common causative microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus. In this comprehensive literature review, we focused on both Staphylococcus aureus infections, i.e., methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis, demographics, use of transthoracic echocardiogram and/or transesophageal echocardiogram for diagnostics, and treatments. Although clinical criteria are relevant, transesophageal echocardiogram plays a vital role in establishing and identifying the presence of infective endocarditis and its local complications, with higher sensitivity in patients with prosthetic valves. The antibiotic selection posed a great challenge for clinicians due to antibiotic resistance and the aggressive nature of Staphylococcus aureus. Early diagnosis of infective endocarditis, when suspected, and effective management by a multispecialty team can improve the outcome for the patients.

ISHLT consensus document on lung transplantation in patients with connective tissue disease: Part II: Cardiac, surgical, perioperative, operative, and post-operative challenges and management statements

Patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) present unique surgical, perioperative, operative, and postoperative challenges related to the often underlying severe pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation-supported consensus document on lung transplantation in patients with CTD standardization addresses the surgical challenges and relevant cardiac involvement in the perioperative, operative, and postoperative management in patients with CTD.

Transesophageal echocardiography instead or in addition to transthoracic echocardiography in evaluating haemodynamic problems in intubated critically ill patients

Background

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) performed by intensivists is increasingly used in critically ill patients. However, TEE is usually not the preferred monitoring tool, especially when transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) appears to have addressed the clinical problems. As a result, it remains largely unknown whether TEE is a clinically valuable replacement or supplement for TTE as a primary tool in evaluating haemodynamic problems in critically ill surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic value of TEE instead or in addition to TTE in critically ill surgical patients with hemodynamic instability.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted. A total of 68 consecutive patients were enrolled from December 2016 to February 2018. TEE was routinely performed in addition to TTE, and the imaging data from TTE and TEE were successively disclosed to two different primary physicians, who reported any resulting changes in management. The two physicians were required to reach a consensus if there was any disagreement. The results of the additional TEE examination were compared with the clinical findings and TTE information. The image quality of TTE views was classified as a good (score 2), suboptimal (score 1) or poor view (score 0). According to the scores of TTE images, the patients were divided into two groups: patients with adequate TTE views (score ≥6) and inadequate TTE views (score <6).

Results

The results of additional TEE examination were classified into four categories. TEE failed to provide additional information about the initial diagnosis and therapy (class 1) in 26 patients (38.2%). Of the remaining 42 patients (61.8%), TEE instead or in addition to TTE revealed new findings or led to significant changes in therapy, as TTE supplied inadequate information. TEE used in addition to TTE led to a new diagnosis without therapeutic implications (class 2) in 11 patients (16.2%) and made a major clinical contribution leading to a therapeutic change (class 3) in 23 patients (33.8%). TEE used instead of TTE determined the diagnosis and therapy in 8 patients (11.8%) whose haemodynamic problems could not be addressed by TTE (class 4). In total, TEE had critical therapeutic benefits (class 3 and 4) that was not provided by TTE in 31 patients (45.6%). Of particular concern was that TEE had a higher proportion of therapeutic benefits to patients with inadequate TTE views than those with adequate TTE views (54.3% vs. 27.3%, P=0.036).

Conclusions

TEE as a feasible clinical tool is useful for critically ill surgical patients with hemodynamic instability, especially for the patients with inadequate TTE views. TEE instead or in addition to TTE could provide valuable information for diagnosis, which may bring significant therapeutic benefits.

Hemodynamic monitoring using trans esophageal echocardiography in patients with shock

Circulatory shock is a life-threatening condition responsible for inadequate tissue perfusion. The objectives of hemodynamic monitoring in this setting are multiple: identifying the mechanisms of shock (hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, obstructive); choosing the adequate therapeutic intervention, and evaluating the patient's response. Echocardiography is proposed as a first line tool for this assessment in the intensive care unit. As compared to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE), trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers a better echogenicity and is the best way to evaluate deep anatomic structures. The therapeutic implication of TEE leads to frequent changes in clinical management. It also allows depicting sources of inaccuracy of thermodilution-based hemodynamic monitoring. It is a semi invasive tool with a low rate of complications. The first step in the hemodynamic evaluation of shock is to characterize the mechanisms of circulatory failure among hypovolemia, vasoplegia, cardiac dysfunction, and obstruction. Echocardiographic evaluation includes evaluation of LV systolic and diastolic function, as well as RV function, pericardium, measure of stroke volume and cardiac output, and evaluation of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. TEE can be used as a semi-continuous monitoring tool and can be repeated before and after therapeutic interventions (vasopressors, inotropes, fluid therapy, specific treatment such as pericardial effusion evacuation) to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of therapeutic interventions. In conclusion, TEE plays an important role in the management of circulatory failure when TTE is not enough to answer to the questions, although it is not a continuous tool of monitoring. TEE results must be integrated in a global evaluation, the first step being clinical examination. Whether TEE-directed therapy and close hemodynamic monitoring of shock has an impact on outcome remains debated.

Impact of goal directed basic echocardiography on diagnostic and therapeutic management in an ICU of cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have evaluated the impact in diagnosis and therapeutic management of basic transthoracic echocardiography in postoperated cardiac surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of basic transthoracic echocardiography in the management of this kind of patients.

DESIGN

Over an 18-month period, we prospectively studied all patients admitted to a university hospital Intensive Care Unit following heart surgery. We evaluated clinically all of them to establish a diagnosis and an initial treatment. We performed basic transthoracic echocardiography for a diagnosis evaluation that was compared with clinical diagnosis. If they differed, we assessed to change treatment and evaluate the therapeutic response. We performed a descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

We included 136 patients and performed 203 echocardiographies. Transthoracic echocardiography differed of initial diagnosis in 101 (49.8%) echocardiographies. In 56 of these echocardiographies (55.44%), we could give an alternative diagnosis with a change in the treatment in 30patients (53,6%). We found clinical improvement in 26 patients (86.76%) in the following 30-60minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Basic transthoracic echocardiography is useful in diagnostic and therapeutic management of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. We could not confirm the clinical diagnosis in half of the performed echocardiographies. In most patients in whom we observe a change in the diagnosis due to echocardiography, we observed a clinical improvement after changing the treatment.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Critical Care Transesophageal Echocardiography vs Cardiology-Led Echocardiography in ICU Patients

BACKGROUND

Critical care transesophageal echocardiography (ccTEE) performed by intensivists is increasingly used to investigate cardiorespiratory failure in the ICU. Validation of the accuracy of TEE in the hands of intensivists remains largely unknown. The goal of this study was to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of ccTEE.

METHODS

This study was a two-center, retrospective comparison between TEE studies performed and interpreted by intensivists and cardiology-led TEE or transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed and/or interpreted by cardiologists. The study period was December 2012 to December 2016 for all consecutive ICU patients who received an initial ccTEE and either a cardiology TEE or TTE within 72 h. Using the cardiology-conducted examination as the gold standard, we reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ccTEE.

RESULTS

Comparisons between ccTEE and cardiology TEE/TTE performed yielded 56 patients (five ccTEE vs cardiology TEE and 51 ccTEE vs cardiology TTE). The comparison between ccTEE and cardiology TEE showed 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for the primary diagnosis and other major findings. For the combined ccTEE and cardiology TEE/TTE comparison, there was a high sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV/accuracy for the primary diagnosis (90%-100% range), as well as other major diagnoses (88%-100% range).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that ccTEE has a high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy compared with the gold standard cardiology TEE or TTEs in critically ill patients, when performed by advanced echocardiogram-trained/experienced intensivists.

Better With Ultrasound: Transesophageal Echocardiography

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a safe and minimally invasive tool that can routinely provide high-quality anatomic and hemodynamic information in the severely ill. Despite its potential for frontline acute care clinicians, TEE use has typically been reserved for diagnostic experts in the cardiac-surgical milieu. With the continued evolution of point-of-care ultrasound into increasingly sophisticated domains, TEE has gained steady uptake in many nontraditional environments for both advanced echocardiographic assessment as well as answering more goal directed, fundamental questions. This article introduces the workings of the TEE transducer, presents a systematic approach to a goal-directed hemodynamic assessment, and includes a series of illustrative figures and narrated video presentations to demonstrate the techniques described.

Impact of Critical Care Transesophageal Echocardiography in Medical-Surgical ICU Patients: Characteristics and Results From 274 Consecutive Examinations

OBJECTIVE

Critical care echocardiography has become an integral tool in the assessment and management of critically ill patients. Critical care transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers diagnostic reliability, superior image quality, and an expanded diagnostic scope to transthoracic echocardiography. Despite its favorable attributes, TEE use in North American intensive care units (ICUs) remains relatively undescribed. In this article, we seek to characterize the feasibility, indications, and clinical impact of a critical care TEE program.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care, academic critical care program consisting of 2 hospitals in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive critical care TEE examinations on ICU patients performed between December 2012 and December 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Consecutive critical care TEE studies on ICU patients from December 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, were reviewed. The TEEs performed on cardiac surgery patients and those without reports were excluded. Examination details, including indications, complications, examination complexity (number of views, Doppler techniques), and clinical recommendations were aggregated and analyzed. Two hundred seventy-four TEE studies were performed by 38 operators. Common indications for TEE studies were hemodynamic instability (45.2%), assessment for infective endocarditis (22.2%), and cardiac arrest (20.1%). A change in patient management was proposed following 79.5% of TEE studies. Thirty-eight percent of TEE studies were performed during evening hours or on weekends. There were no mechanical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observational data support intensivist-performed TEE as being safe and therapeutically influential across a broad range of indications. Our program's demonstrated feasibility and impact may act as a model for TEE adoption in other North American ICUs.

Evaluation of intensivist basic training in transthoracic echocardiography in the postoperative period of heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography can significantly change the management of many critical patients, and is being incorporated into many Intensive Care Units (ICU). Very few studies have examined the feasibility and impact of intensivists performing basic transthoracic echocardiography upon the management of critical patients after cardiac surgery. The present study therefore evaluates the quality of acquisition and accuracy of intensivist interpretation of basic transthoracic echocardiograms in the postoperative period of heart surgery.

METHODS

Over an 8-month period we prospectively studied 148 patients within 24h after admission to a university hospital ICU following heart surgery. We performed basic transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate ventricular function, pericardial effusion, hypovolemia and mitral regurgitation. Cohen's Kappa was used to compare transthoracic echocardiograms obtained by intensivists with basic versus advanced training. Concordance on image acquisition and interpretation was evaluated.

RESULTS

We analyzed data of adequate transthoracic echocardiograms in 148 patients (92.5%). Apical four-chamber view and advanced trainees obtained better quality images. Concordance was good for right and left ventricular function (kappa=0.7±0.14 and 0.87±0.05, respectively), and moderate for the remaining parameters. Interpretation concordance between basic and advanced training intensivists was good (kappa=0.73±0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensivists with basic training in echocardiography are capable of performing and interpreting echocardiograms in most patients during the postoperative period of heart surgery.

Quest for the holy grail: Assessment of echo-derived dynamic parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Background:

Acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a potentially devastating event often presenting with a plethora of hemodynamic fluctuations requiring meticulous fluid management. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of newer dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as Delta down (DD), superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVCCI), and aortic velocity time integral variability (VTIAoV) in patients with SAH undergoing neurosurgery.

Materials and Methods:

Fifteen individuals with SAH undergoing surgery for intracranial aneurysmal clipping were enrolled in this prospective study. Postinduction, vitals, anesthetic parameters, and the study variables were recorded as the baseline. Following this, patients received a fluid bolus of 10 ml/kg of colloid over 20 min, and measurements were repeated postfluid loading. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using Student's t-test, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The predictive ability of variables for fluid responsiveness was determined using Pearson's coefficient analysis (r).

Results:

There were 12 volume responders and 3 nonresponders (NR). DD >5 mm Hg was efficient in differentiating the responders from NR (P < 0.05) with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 85%, respectively, with a good predictive ability to identify fluid responders and NR; r = 0.716. SVCCI of >38% was 100% sensitive and 95% specific in detecting the volume status and in differentiating the responders from NR (P < 0.05) and is an excellent predictor of fluid responsive status; r = 0.906. VTIAoV >20% too proved to be a good predictor of fluid responsiveness, with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 90%, respectively, with a predictive power; r = 0.732.

Conclusion:

Our study showed that 80% of patients presenting with aSAH for intracranial aneurysm clipping were fluid responders with normal hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure. Among the variables, SVCCI >38% appears to be an excellent predictor followed by VTIAoV >20% and DD >5 mmHg in assessing the fluid status in this population.

Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Intensive Care Unit

Transesophageal echocardiography provides unique diagnostic capabilities, allowing for a very precise look at the structure and hemodynamics of the human heart. It is minimally invasive and portable, and quickly diagnoses sudden hemodynamic changes in intensive care patients. It provides invaluable and precise information about myocardial dysfunction and intracardiac volume status. It can diagnose dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction, infrequent but serious complication of aortic valve replacement, septal myectomy, or mitral valve repair. Transesophageal echocardiography examination can exclude cardiac tamponade and intracardiac source of embolization, and it offers the ability to visualize native or prosthetic valves and assesses their function in the postoperative period. It is helpful in diagnosing endocarditis and the presence of intracardiac masses. In the diagnosis of blunt chest trauma, transesophageal echocardiography offers a fast and safe look at ascending and descending aorta and pericardial effusion, facilitating future decisions about patient management. In patients with postoperative hypoxia, it can exclude intracardiac shunt. Finally, in heart transplants or in managing patients with mechanical heart assist devices, transesophageal echocardiography is an invaluable tool in assessing progress of treatment and complications arising from the procedures. With the introduction of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography probes, technology, and experienced personnel, transesophageal echocardiography becomes the extension of the physical examination in the intensive care unit. This example is one of only a few whereby technology brings the physician closer to the patient.

Early hemodynamic assessment and treatment of elderly patients in the medical ICU

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze differences in the initial hemodynamic assessment and its impact on the treatment in patients aged 80 years or older compared to younger patients during the first 6 h after admission to the medical intensive care unit (ICU).

RESULTS

We analyzed 615 consecutive patients admitted to the medical ICU of which 124 (20%) were aged 80 years or more. The older group had a significantly higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score, an overall mortality in the ICU and a presence of pre-existing cardiac disease. Both groups did not differ in the presence of shock and shock types on admission. In 57% of older and in 56% of younger patients, transthoracic echocardiography was performed with a higher therapeutic impact in the older patients. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 3% of the patients in both groups for specific diagnostic problems. Early reassessment with transthoracic echocardiography was necessary in 5% of the older and in 6% of the younger patients and resulted in a change of the treatment in one third of the patients. Continuous invasive hemodynamic monitoring was used in 11% of the older and in 10% of the younger patients and resulted in a therapeutic change in 71% of the older and in 64% of the younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients aged 80 years or older represent 20% of all admissions to the medical ICU. Once admitted the older patients were similarly hemodynamically assessed as the younger ones with a similar impact on the treatment.

Safety of transesophageal echocardiography during extracorporeal life support

INTRODUCTION:

Use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has significantly increased in critically ill patients refractory to medical management. ECLS requires systemic anticoagulation to avoid thromboembolic complications and superimposed coagulopathies are common. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is frequently employed to assess cannula position and cardiac function during extracorporeal therapy. The goal of this study was to assess whether TEE probe insertion and removal in systemically anticoagulated ECLS patients was safe compared to patients without ECLS and normal coagulation studies.

METHODS:

Eighty-seven separate TEE examinations in 53 adult ECLS patients were analyzed. Detailed complication profiles were logged for each patient from initiation through discontinuation of ECLS. Routine coagulation testing was recorded within two hours prior to the TEE exams. Controls consisted of age- and gender-matched patients undergoing perioperative TEE without ECLS and normal coagulation (N=87).

RESULTS:

Overall TEE-associated morbidity in ECLS patients was 2.3% and consisted of minor oropharyngeal bleeding (2/87 TEE exams) exclusively. The patients presenting with oropharyngeal bleeding received heparin for anticoagulation and had two or more abnormal coagulation studies at the time of TEE. Seventy-nine percent of ECLS patients received intravenous heparin infusions, 6.8% argatroban and 3.4% epoprostenol. Ten-point-eight percent of patients were not anticoagulated at the time of TEE because of pre-existing bleeding complications and/or deranged plasmatic coagulation profiles. No major complications (e.g., esophageal perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, accidental extubation) were recorded in either group.

CONCLUSIONS:

TEE remained safe in critically ill patients under ECLS, despite systemic anticoagulation, during probe insertion, manipulation and removal. TEE-related complications pertained solely to oropharyngeal bleeding amenable to conservative management.

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in the Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE

In light of point-of-care ultrasonography's (POCUS) recent rise in popularity, assessment of its impact on diagnosis and treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is of key importance.

METHODS

Ultrasound examinations were collected through an ultrasound reporting software in 6 multidisciplinary ICU units from 3 university hospitals in Canada and the United States. This database included a self-reporting questionnaire to assess the impact of the ultrasound findings on diagnosis and treatment. We retrieved the results of these questionnaires and analyzed them in relation to which organs were assessed during the ultrasound examination.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred and fifteen ultrasound studies were performed on 968 patients. Intensivists considered the image quality of cardiac ultrasound to be adequate in 94.7% compared to 99.7% for general ultrasound ( P < .001). The median duration of a cardiac examination was 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 10) minutes compared to 5 (IQR 8) minutes for a general examination ( P < .001). Overall, ultrasound findings led to a change in diagnosis in 302 studies (24.9%) and to a change in management in 534 studies (44.0%). A change in diagnosis or management was reported more frequently for cardiac ultrasound than for general ultrasound (108 [37.1%] vs 127 [16.5%], P < .001) and (170 [58.4%] vs 270 [35.1%], P < .001). Assessment of the inferior vena cava for fluid status emerged as the critical care ultrasound application associated with the greatest impact on management.

CONCLUSION

Point-of-care ultrasonography has the potential to optimize care of the critically ill patients when added to the clinical armamentarium of the intensive care physician.

Hemodynamic assessment in the contemporary intensive care unit: a review of circulatory monitoring devices

The assessment of the circulating volume and efficiency of tissue perfusion is necessary in the management of critically ill patients. The controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization has led to a new wave of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, including echocardiographic and Doppler imaging, pulse wave analysis, and bioimpedance. This article reviews the principles, advantages, and limitations of these technologies and the clinical contexts in which they may be clinically useful.

Utility of ultrasound in the ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of ultrasound in the acute care setting has become more common in recent years. However, it still remains underutilized in the perioperative management of critical patients. In this review, we aim to increase the awareness of ultrasound as an important diagnostic modality that can be used in the perioperative period to improve patient care. Our main focus will be in describing the diagnostic uses of ultrasound to identify cardiac, pulmonary, airway and vascular diseases commonly encountered in acute care settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

We find that ultrasound can be used in a quick fashion to assess a haemodynamically unstable patient. Protocols are available to use ultrasound as a part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ultrasound can help in deciding fluid vs. pressor treatment by evaluating the inferior vena cava and other cardiac structures.Lung ultrasound can not only help in diagnosing pneumothoracies and effusions but also look at lung recruitment and diaphragmatic movement, hence can aid in deciding extubation strategies. This modality can be utilized for confirmation of endotracheal tube.Recent interest in axillary vein cannulation with ultrasound guidance has gained some momentum.

SUMMARY

This article covers the recent developments and literature available on point of care ultrasound and its utilization in the perioperative period. We have not covered some other important uses of ultrasound such as abdominal examination looking at the aorta and other abdominal organs. This was beyond the scope of this article.

Prospective assessment of a score for assessing basic critical-care transthoracic echocardiography skills in ventilated critically ill patients

Background

We studied a score for assessing basic transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) skills exhibited by residents who examined critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study in the 16 residents who worked in our medical-surgical ICU between 1 May 2008 and 1 November 2009. The residents received theoretical teaching (two hours) then performed supervised TTEs during their six-month rotation. Their basic TTE skills in mechanically ventilated patients were evaluated after one (M1), three (M3), and six (M6) months by two experts, who used a scoring system devised for the study. After scoring, residents gave their hemodynamic diagnosis and suggested a treatment.

Results

The 4 residents with previous TTE skills obtained a significantly higher total score than did the 12 novices at M1 (18 (16 to 19) versus 13 (10 to 15), respectively, P = 0.03). In the novices, the total score increased significantly during training (M1, 13 (10 to 14); M3, 15 (12 to 16); and M6, 17 (15 to 18); P < 0.001) and correlated significantly with the number of supervised TTEs (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001). In the overall population, agreement with experts regarding the diagnosis and treatment was associated with a significantly higher total score (17 (16 to 18) versus 13 (12 to 16), P = 0.002). A total score ≥ 19/20 points had 100% specificity (95% confidence interval, 79 to 100%) for full agreement with the experts regarding the diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusions

Our results validate the scoring system developed for our study of the assessment of basic critical-care TTE skills in residents.

Perioperative anesthesiological management of patients with pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a major reason for elevated perioperative morbidity and mortality, even in noncardiac surgical procedures. Patients should be thoroughly prepared for the intervention and allowed plenty of time for consideration. All specialty units involved in treatment should play a role in these preparations. After selecting each of the suitable individual anesthetic and surgical procedures, intraoperative management should focus on avoiding all circumstances that could contribute to exacerbating pulmonary hypertension (hypoxemia, hypercapnia, acidosis, hypothermia, hypervolemia, and insufficient anesthesia and analgesia). Due to possible induction of hypotonic blood circulation, intravenous vasodilators (milrinone, dobutamine, prostacyclin, Na-nitroprusside, and nitroglycerine) should be administered with the greatest care. A method of treating elevations in pulmonary pressure with selective pulmonary vasodilation by inhalation should be available intraoperatively (iloprost, nitrogen monoxide, prostacyclin, and milrinone) in addition to invasive hemodynamic monitoring. During the postoperative phase, patients must be monitored continuously and receive sufficient analgesic therapy over an adequate period of time. All in all, perioperative management of patients with pulmonary hypertension presents an interdisciplinary challenge that requires the adequate involvement of anesthetists, surgeons, pulmonologists, and cardiologists alike.

Core review: physician-performed ultrasound: the time has come for routine use in acute care medicine

The use of ultrasound in the acute care specialties of anesthesiology, intensive care, emergency medicine, and surgery has evolved from discrete, office-based echocardiographic examinations to the real-time or point-of-care clinical assessment and interventions. "Goal-focused" transthoracic echocardiography is a limited scope (as compared with comprehensive examination) echocardiographic examination, performed by the treating clinician in acute care medical practice, and is aimed at addressing specific clinical concerns. In the future, the practice of surface ultrasound will be integrated into the everyday clinical practice as ultrasound-assisted examination and ultrasound-guided procedures. This evolution should start at the medical student level and be reinforced throughout specialist training. The key to making ultrasound available to every physician is through education programs designed to facilitate uptake, rather than to prevent access to this technology and education by specialist craft groups. There is evidence that diagnosis is improved with ultrasound examination, yet data showing change in management and improvement in patient outcome are few and an important area for future research.

Transesophageal Echocardiography–Guided Hemodynamic Assessment and Management

Hemodynamic instability (shock) poses a major challenge in intensive care and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, length of stay, and costs. The purpose of hemodynamic assessment and management is to detect the cause of hemodynamic instability in a given patient, provide actionable information for the physician, and thus help guide the management and resolution of hemodynamic instability. Although transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the gold standard for hemodynamic assessment and management in the cardiac operating room, the invasive nature of conventional TEE has limited its use as a management tool in intensive care. Instead, one has seen a variety of indirect hemodynamic monitors used, despite now well understood limitations as described in a previous Critical Conversation in the July 2011 issue of this journal. Here we describe the use of TEE in intensive care as well as a new TEE system (the ImaCor hTEE system, ImaCor, Garden City, NY) with a miniaturized (approximately nasogastric tube sized), indwelling probe designed specifically for TEE-guided hemodynamic assessment and management in intensive care (hemodynamic TEE).

Echocardiography in the Intensive Care Unit

As ultrasound technology improves and ultrasound availability increases, echocardiography utilization is growing within intensive care units. Although not replacing the often-needed comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation, limited bedside echocardiography promises to provide intensivists with enhanced diagnostic ability and improved hemodynamic understanding of individual patients. Routine and emergency echocardiography within the intensive care unit focuses on identifying and optimizing medically treatable conditions in a timely manner. Methods for such goal-directed assessments are presented.

Prolonged Transesophageal Echocardiography Use in the ICU

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained increasing popularity in the operating room and intensive care settings. The use of TEE can often times diagnose pathology that is missed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE); in addition, it can be used as a guide to continuously monitor a patient’s hemodynamics, along with observing the direct cardiac effects of fluid and vasopressor therapy. We present a case of acute fulminant hepatic failure in the ICU, where TEE allowed a rapid diagnosis. We performed prolonged TEE monitoring (72 hours) of the patient to monitor the patient’s response to therapeutic interventions. We also discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of prolonged TEE placement in the ICU. In addition, particular strategies to optimize the benefit and minimize the risk of this exciting, yet underutilized, technology are discussed.

International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography

Training in ultrasound techniques for intensive care medicine physicians should aim at achieving competencies in three main areas: (1) general critical care ultrasound (GCCUS), (2) "basic" critical care echocardiography (CCE), and (3) advanced CCE. A group of 29 experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and 11 other critical care societies worldwide worked on a potential framework for organizing training adapted to each area of competence. This framework is mainly aimed at defining minimal requirements but is by no means rigid or restrictive: each training organization can be adapted according to resources available. There was 100% agreement among the participants that general critical care ultrasound and "basic" critical care echocardiography should be mandatory in the curriculum of intensive care unit (ICU) physicians. It is the role of each critical care society to support the implementation of training in GCCUS and basic CCE in its own country.

Safety of transesophageal echocardiography

Since its introduction into the operating room in the early 1980s, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained widespread use during cardiac, major vascular, and transplantation surgery, as well as in emergency and intensive care medicine. Moreover, TEE has become an invaluable diagnostic tool for the management of patients with cardiovascular disease in a nonoperative setting. In comparison with other diagnostic modalities, TEE is relatively safe and noninvasive. However, the insertion and manipulation of the ultrasound probe can cause oropharyngeal, esophageal, or gastric trauma. Here, the authors review the safety profile of TEE by identifying complications and propose a set of relative and absolute contraindications to probe placement. In addition, alternative echocardiographic modalities (e.g., epicardial echocardiography) that may be considered when TEE probe placement is contraindicated or not feasible are discussed.

Use of transesophageal echocardiography in burns:a retrospective review

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a useful tool in the evaluation and management of critically ill patients. However, it has not been studied in the burn population. The purpose of this review is to describe the safety and utility of TEE in the management of acute burns. This retrospective review included all acute burn inpatients who underwent TEE during a 5-year period at our regional burn center. TEE board-certified anesthesiologists performed all studies. We reviewed the chart of patients who underwent TEE, the indication for TEE, the effect of TEE on clinical management, and complications resulting from TEE. Seventeen burn patients underwent TEE during the review period. The median age was 45.4 years. Fourteen of 17 patients were men (82%). Median TBSA burn was 43.4%. Seven patients (41%) were on vasopressors or inotropic agents at the time of TEE. The main indications for TEE were hypotension and bacteremia. Findings included hypovolemia, mitral valve vegetation, pulmonary hypertension, pericardial effusion, fluid overload, right heart failure, and normal TEE. Therapeutic changes occurred after TEE in two patients; these included initiation of inotropic support and antibiotics. There were no complications identified in association with TEE. TEE is a safe procedure that serves multiple diagnostic purposes. TEE is being used to better understand the fluid status and cardiac physiology of the critically ill burn patient.

Inadequate visualization and reporting of ventricular function from transthoracic echocardiography after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for inadequate reporting of ventricular function from transthoracic echocardiography after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study of cardiac surgical patients at 1 university hospital.

PATIENTS

The first 300 consecutive patients who had transthoracic echocardiogram within the first 7 days after cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcomes for this study were inadequate visualization of the left ventricle, the right ventricle, or both ventricles. Analysis of data from 300 patients identified inadequate imaging of the left ventricle in 50 (17%) cases, inadequate imaging of the right ventricle in 112 (37%) cases, inadequate imaging of both ventricles in 37 (12%) cases, and inadequate imaging of either the left or right ventricle in 125 (42%) cases. Increasing age, earlier postoperative day, male sex, and median sternotomy were associated with inadequate imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic imaging is often inadequate in patients who have undergone recent cardiac surgery. Patient and surgical characteristics influence reporting of right and left ventricular function.

Is a 4 days transoesophageal training course sufficient to diagnose shock related pathologies?

INTRODUCTION

Echocardiography is a useful tool in patients suffering from shock of unknown origin to evaluate cardiac function and volume status in order to decide on further treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate how well participants could identify function, preload and regional wall motion abnormalities after attending a 4-day transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) seminar.

METHODS

In this prospective educational trial, participants of six TOE seminars from 2005 to 2006 were evaluated. On the basis of seven echocardiographic studies, evaluations by participants concerning cardiac function, preload and regional wall motion were analyzed. Moreover, specific causes of undifferentiated hypotension were to be judged in three cases by the participants.

RESULTS

A total of 115 participants of the TOE seminars from 2005 to 2006 were evaluated. Correct sectional plane was recognized by more than 76% of the participants. Left ventricular function, preload, and regional wall abnormalities were assessed correctly by the participants in 98%, 96%, and 84%, respectively. Moreover, more than 70% of the participants recognized the correct cause of hemodynamic instability.

CONCLUSION

The results of the investigation show that participants of a 4-day TOE seminar can interpret left ventricular function, preload and regional wall motion abnormalities correctly at a very high rate. TOE seminars seem to be effective in teaching basic theoretical knowledge of TOE.

[Echocardiography in the Intensive Care Unit]

The echocardiography can provide important and relevant information and the critically ill patient presents a challenge for the echocardiographer: from limitations in image acquisition to interpretation in the context of rapid physiological and intervention changes. The most frequent reason for requesting an echocardiogram in the ICU is probably to assess left ventricular function. In any case, information of direct relevance for clinical management can in relationship to abnormalities of structure and function can be obtained and used to estimate pulmonary arterial and venous pressures. It can help to investigate the consequences of myocardial ischemia, valvular dysfunction and pericardial disease and detect changes characteristic of specific conditions (e.g. sepsis, pulmonary thromboembolism), although this must be interpreted in the context of each individual patient. The echocardiography also can be used to monitor the therapeutic interventions. The applications of echocardiography in the critical care setting are reviewed, with special emphasis on the assessment of cardiac physiology.

Transesophageal echocardiography and noncardiac surgery

The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for monitoring during cardiac and noncardiac surgery has increased exponentially over the past few decades. TEE has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a monitoring device and a procedural adjunct. The close proximity of the TEE transducer to the heart generates high-quality images of the intracardiac structures and their spatial orientation. The use of TEE in noncardiac and critical care settings is not well studied, and the evidence of the benefits of its use in these settings is lacking. Despite the widespread availability of TEE equipment in US hospitals, less than 30% of anesthesiologists are formally trained in the use of perioperative TEE. In this review, the safety and indications of TEE are reviewed and detailed analysis of the best available evidence in this regard is presented. Landmark trials evaluating the use of TEE and its therapeutic impact in noncardiac surgical setting are critically reviewed. This article details recommendations to familiarize anesthesiologists with TEE technology to exploit it to its fullest potential to achieve better patient monitoring standards and eventually improve outcome. Training of greater numbers of anesthesiologists in TEE is needed to increase awareness of the indications and contraindications. Until relatively inexpensive TEE equipment is available, the initial cost of equipment acquisition remains a significant prohibitive factor limiting its widespread use.

Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS)

Echocardiography is increasingly used in the management of the critically ill patient as a non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring tool. Whilst in few countries specialized national training schemes for intensive care unit (ICU) echocardiography have been developed, specific guidelines for ICU physicians wishing to incorporate echocardiography into their clinical practice are lacking. Further, existing echocardiography accreditation does not reflect the requirements of the ICU practitioner. The WINFOCUS (World Interactive Network Focused On Critical UltraSound) ECHO-ICU Group drew up a document aimed at providing guidance to individual physicians, trainers and the relevant societies of the requirements for the development of skills in echocardiography in the ICU setting. The document is based on recommendations published by the Royal College of Radiologists, British Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Echocardiography and American Society of Echocardiography, together with international input from established practitioners of ICU echocardiography. The recommendations contained in this document are concerned with theoretical basis of ultrasonography, the practical aspects of building an ICU-based echocardiography service as well as the key components of standard adult TTE and TEE studies to be performed on the ICU. Specific issues regarding echocardiography in different ICU clinical scenarios are then described. Obtaining competence in ICU echocardiography may be achieved in different ways - either through completion of an appropriate fellowship/training scheme, or, where not available, via a staged approach designed to train the practitioner to a level at which they can achieve accreditation. Here, peri-resuscitation focused echocardiography represents the entry level--obtainable through established courses followed by mentored practice. Next, a competence-based modular training programme is proposed: theoretical elements delivered through blended-learning and practical elements acquired in parallel through proctored practice. These all linked with existing national/international echocardiography courses. When completed, it is anticipated that the practitioner will have performed the prerequisite number of studies, and achieved the competency to undertake accreditation (leading to Level 2 competence) via a recognized National or European examination and provide the appropriate required evidence of competency (logbook). Thus, even where appropriate fellowships are not available, with support from the relevant echocardiography bodies, training and subsequently accreditation in ICU echocardiography becomes achievable within the existing framework of current critical care and cardiological practice, and is adaptable to each countrie's needs.

The importance of transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosis of pericardial tamponade after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Despite the fact that there is a simple and effective treatment for pericardial tamponade (PCT), delayed diagnosis can cause serious morbidities or even mortality. In this study, we discuss the management and the diagnostic procedures of PCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-two patients with suspected PCT were initially evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and then with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Forty-nine (79%) patients were chosen for surgery after TEE displayed a suspected PCT diagnosis. Patients with suspected PCT were divided into two groups: Early-phase PCT (symptoms developed within 72 hours) and late-phase PCT (symptoms developed after 72 hours).

RESULTS

Thirty-five (56%) patients were in the early phase and 27 (44%) patients were in the late phase. In 13 out of 22 (59%) cases, from both early and late phases, TTE findings showed no PCT, but TEE findings showed a positive PCT diagnosis. All 13 of the cases where TEE was positive after a negative TTE were confirmed by surgery. Overall, the PCT diagnoses in 48 out of 49 patients were confirmed during surgery.

DISCUSSION

The role of echocardiography in PCT diagnosis is shown to be extremely important in some clinical cases, such as in patients during the postoperative period after cardiac surgery. Furthermore, particularly when TTE does not provide complete imaging of the pericardial sac, TEE should be mandatory. We recommend that even patients with a negative diagnosis of PCT from TTE should undergo further evaluation with TEE.

Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure in ventilated patients: a transoesophageal study

Background

Non-invasive evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure has been scarcely studied in critically ill patients. Accordingly, we prospectively assessed the ability of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) Doppler to predict an invasive pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) ≤ 18 mmHg in ventilated patients.

Methods

During two consecutive 3-year periods, TEE Doppler parameters were compared to right heart catheterisation derived PAOP used as reference in 88 ventilated patients, haemodynamically stable and in sinus rhythm (age: 63 ± 14 years; simplified acute physiologic score (SAPS) II: 45 ± 12). During the initial period (protocol A), threshold values of pulsed-wave Doppler parameters to predict an invasive PAOP ≤ 18 mmHg were determined in 56 patients. Derived Doppler values were prospectively tested during the subsequent period (protocol B) in 32 patients.

Results

In protocol A, Doppler parameters had similar area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In protocol B, mitral E/A ≤ 1.4, pulmonary vein S/D > 0.65 and systolic fraction > 44% best predicted an invasive PAOP ≤ 18 mmHg. Lateral E/E' ≤ 8.0 or E/Vp ≤ 1.7 predicted a PAOP ≤ 18 mmHg with a sensitivity of 83% and 80%, and a specificity of 88% and 100%, respectively. Areas under ROC curves of lateral E/E' and E/Vp were similar (0.91 ± 0.07 vs 0.92 ± 0.07: p = 0.53), and not significantly different from those of pulsed-wave Doppler indices.

Conclusion

TEE accurately predicts invasive PAOP ≤ 18 mmHg in ventilated patients. This further increases its diagnostic value in patients with suspected acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Cardiologists use pulmonary artery catheter information to make homogenous treatment decisions

Medical intensivists make heterogenous decisions using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) data in medical intensive care unit patients. The object was to determine if cardiologists given PAC data from critically ill cardiology patients make uniform management choices. A survey questionnaire containing 3 coronary care unit (CCU) clinical vignettes was designed and mailed to board-certified cardiologists who are members of the American College of Cardiology. Twenty board-certified medical intensivists were also asked to complete the vignettes. Each vignette contained PAC data and one-half of the surveys contained echocardiographic (ECHO) information. Every respondent was asked to select 1 of 6 interventions for each vignette. In 2 of 3 vignettes 1 intervention was selected by more than 70% of cardiologists. In the third vignette, 1 intervention was selected by more than 50% of cardiologists. For each vignette, 1 intervention was selected by at least 75% of medical intensivists. There was no significant difference in the distribution of management choices between the ECHO and the non-ECHO subgroups. There is relative homogeneity in selecting an intervention based on PAC data among cardiologists and medical intensivists in CCU patients and is probably due to patient-related factors. The presence of ECHO information did not change the intervention selected. Cardiology patients may represent an ideal group in which to evaluate PAC efficacy.

Monitoring of whole-body hyperthermia with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)

Hyperthermia induces tumor cell death by a spectrum of tumor tissue changes. As whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) can cause cardiovascular complications, especially when cardiotoxic cytostatic agents are administered, invasive cardiovascular monitoring during WBH is necessary. WBH requires a great deal of expenditure and bears the risk of severe toxicity. Furthermore cardiovascular stress, alterations of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance are major problems during WBH. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate cardiovascular changes in patients undergoing WBH under general anesthesia using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with special focus on left ventricular function.

METHODS

Hemodynamic parameters were measured with standard monitoring and TEE at defined time points in 20 patients (ASA III) undergoing WBH: M37 (baseline, body temperature: 37 degrees C) after induction of anesthesia, M39 during warming up (39 degrees C), M41.8 at plateau level (41.8 degrees C), M38 during cooling period (38 degrees C).

RESULTS

Invasive monitoring and TEE measurements showed signs of hyperdynamic circulation with significant increase of the heart rate (73.6 +/- 13.7 min(-1) (M37), 104.6 +/- 13.0 min(-1) (M41.8)) and significant decrease of mean blood pressure (74.9 +/- 15.3 mmHg (M37), 65.3 +/- 11.2 mmHg (M41.8)). Cardiac index (CI) nearly doubled and stroke volume index (SVI) increased significantly from M37 to M41.8. Cardiac contractility, fractional area change (FAC) and ejection fraction (EF) increased. At M38 CI, SVI, FAC and EF showed a tendency to decrease compared to M41.8 but remained elevated compared to M37.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing WBH showed typical signs of hyperdynamic circulation without impairment of left ventricle which could be monitored excellently by TEE. We recommend using TEE especially in patients with an increased cardiac risk.

Importance of transesophageal echocardiography in the critically ill and injured patient

Echocardiography, particularly transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), is a vital diagnostic and monitoring imaging modality for the intensivist. The field of echocardiography spans different venues and pathologies, ranging from surface transthoracic echocardiography and portable hand-held echocardiography, to contrast echocardiography, stress echocardiography, and TEE, among others. Numerous investigations have proven the worth of echocardiography, especially TEE, in the critically ill and injured patient, changing lives with the identification of obvious and subtle cardiothoracic diseases. Because this powerful imaging tool is immediately available and portable, crucial delays in diagnosis are not commonplace; rather than echocardiography, TEE, specifically, should be (and is in some institutions) the standard of care and management in assisting the intensivist in diagnosis of a variety of maladies. The effect of TEE technology is quite formidable, and numerous investigations have borne this out. The therapeutic effect of TEE ranges from 10% to 69%, with the majority of investigations falling into the 60% to 65% range. The diagnostic yield of TEE is far greater, approaching 78%. This article will detail the importance of echocardiography, its efficacy, and its high-yield imaging capability, particularly when compared with other imaging modalities, even transthoracic echocardiography.

Bedside echocardiography in the assessment of the critically ill

Advances in ultrasound technology continue to enhance its diagnostic applications in daily medical practice. Bedside echocardiographic examination has become useful to properly trained cardiologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, surgeons, and emergency room physicians. Cardiac ultrasound can permit rapid, accurate, and noninvasive diagnosis of a broad range of acute cardiovascular pathologies. Although transesophageal echocardiography was once the principal diagnostic approach using ultrasound to evaluate intensive care unit patients, advances in ultrasound imaging, including harmonic imaging, digital acquisition, and contrast for endocardial enhancement, has improved the diagnostic yield of transthoracic echocardiography. Ultrasound devices continue to become more portable, and hand-carried devices are now readily available for bedside applications. This article discusses the application of bedside echocardiography in the intensive care unit. The emphasis is on echocardiography and cardiovascular diagnostics, specifically on goal-directed bedside cardiac ultrasonography.

Echocardiography and assessing fluid responsiveness: acoustic quantification again into the picture?

Accurate identification of fluid responsiveness has become an important issue in critically ill patients. Pulse pressure and stroke volume variation have been shown to be reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness. Apart from these two valuable techniques, echo-Doppler offers an interesting alternative for estimating the adequacy of filling. Acoustic quantification is a high-tech tool for delineating the blood-tissue interface on-screen in real time. Cannesson and coworkers utilized this technique in ventilated patients to assess stroke area changes, with the intention being to predict fluid responsiveness.

A Systematic Approach to Substernal Epicardial Echocardiographic Examination

OBJECTIVE

The importance of echocardiography in the perioperative management of cardiac surgical patients is widely appreciated. A modified mediastinal drain has been developed, which allows the introduction of a standard TEE probe in a closed-ended sleeve coupled with the drain to permit epicardial echocardiographic imaging after chest closure (substernal epicardial echocardiography [SEE]). The aim of the present study was to develop a standardized and comprehensive SEE examination sequence to allow repeatable examinations with a single movement of the TEE probe inside the drain.

DESIGN

Prospective observational protocol.

SETTING

Tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-three SEE examinations in 10 patients undergoing elective myocardial revascularization to develop a standard examination sequence.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The examination sequence includes 11 views with all the structures relevant for postoperative monitoring. The entire sequence is performed with a single in-out movement of the transesophageal probe to minimize discomfort to patients and the risk of damaging the tube.

CONCLUSIONS

This new approach to the perioperative monitoring of cardiac surgical patients represents an option for patients in whom TEE is contraindicated or multiple examinations are anticipated because SEE examinations can be performed without the need for sedation in awake patients.