Fluticasone/Salmeterol combination confers benefits in people with asthma who smoke

GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

The Impact of Corticosteroids on Human Airway Smooth Muscle Contractility and Airway Hyperresponsiveness: A Systematic Review

Classically, the effects elicited by corticosteroids (CS) are mediated by the binding and activation of cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors (GR). However, several of the non-genomic effects of CS seem to be mediated by putative non-classic membrane receptors characterized by pharmacological properties that are different from those of classic cytosolic GR. Since pre-clinical findings suggest that inhaled CS (ICS) may also regulate the bronchial contractile tone via putative CS membrane-associate receptors, the aim of this review was to systematically report and discuss the impact of CS on human airway smooth muscle (ASM) contractility and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Current evidence indicates that CS have significant genomic/non-genomic beneficial effects on human ASM contractility and AHR, regardless of their anti-inflammatory effects. CS are effective in reducing either the expression, synthesis or activity of α-actin, CD38, inositol phosphate, myosin light chain kinase, and ras homolog family member A in response to several pro-contractile stimuli; overall these effects are mediated by the genomic action of CS. Moreover, CS elicited a strong bronchorelaxant effect via the rapid activation of the Gsα-cyclic-adenosine-monophosphate-protein-kinase-A pathway in hyperresponsive airways. The possibility of modulating the dose of the ICS in a triple ICS/long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist fixed-dose combination supports the use of a Triple MAintenance and Reliever Therapy (TriMART) in those asthmatic patients at Step 3-5 who may benefit from a sustained bronchodilation and have been suffering from an increased parasympathetic tone.

Asthma and Tobacco Smoking

Asthma is a prevalent chronic pulmonary condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Tobacco smoking is implicated in asthma pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Smokers display increased prevalence and incidence of asthma, but a causal association cannot be claimed using existing evidence. Second-hand smoking and passive exposure to tobacco in utero and early life have also been linked with asthma development. Currently, approximately one-fourth of asthma patients are smokers. Regular smokers with asthma might display accelerated lung function decline and non-reversible airflow limitation, making their distinction from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients challenging. Asthma patients who smoke typically have uncontrolled disease, as shown by increased symptoms, more exacerbations and impaired quality of life. On the other hand, smoking cessation improves lung function and asthma severity. Thus, asthma patients and their caregivers should be actively questioned about their smoking status at each medical encounter, and smoking cessation ought to be strongly encouraged both for patients with asthma and their close contacts. Smokers with asthma should be provided with comprehensive smoking cessation interventions on top of other anti-asthma medications.

Cigarette Smoking and Asthma

Globally, around half the adult asthma population are current or former cigarette smokers. Cigarette smoking and asthma interact to induce an "asthma-smoking phenotype(s)," which has important implications for diagnosis, pathogenic mechanisms, and management. The lack of progress in understanding the effects of smoking on adults with asthma is due in part to their exclusion from most investigative studies and large clinical trials. In this review, we summarize the adverse clinical outcomes associated with cigarette smoking in asthma, highlight challenges in diagnosing asthma among cigarette smokers with chronic respiratory symptoms, particularly in older individuals with a long-standing smoking history, and review pathogenic mechanisms involving smoking- and asthma-related airway inflammation, tissue remodeling, corticosteroid insensitivity, and low-grade systemic inflammation. We discuss the key components of management including the importance of smoking cessation strategies, evidence for the effectiveness of the Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations on treatment in cigarette smokers, and the role of treatable traits such as type 2 eosinophilic airway inflammation. Lastly, we provide an algorithm to aid clinicians to manage current and former smokers with asthma. In the future, controlled and pragmatic trials in real-world populations should include cigarette smokers with asthma to provide an evidence base for treatment recommendations.

Increase in FeNO Levels Following IL5/IL5R-Targeting Therapies in Severe Asthma: A Case Series

Purpose

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin-5 (IL5) and its receptor (IL5R), used for severe asthma treatment, reduce eosinophils to almost complete depletion. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a surrogate marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is expected to decrease after their initiation. Our center noticed increased FeNO levels in a few patients in whom anti-IL5/IL5R therapy was initiated. Limited data are available on the kinetics of T2 inflammation biomarkers after initiation of a biologic in that population. This study aims to identify if a subgroup of severe asthma patients experiences increased FeNO levels after initiation of anti-IL5/IL5R therapy and to describe their clinical characteristics.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective case series of 5 patients on Benralizumab (4M:1F) and 8 on Mepolizumab (5M:3F) who showed a significant increase in FeNO (>20% AND >25 ppb) following initiation of an anti-IL5/IL5R treatment. Clinical data, expiratory flows, and inflammation were extracted from the patients’ chart at initiation of treatment (T₀), 3 months (T₁) and 12 months (T₂) post-treatment. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results

In patients treated with Benralizumab, the increase in FeNO was observed between T₀ and T₁ (mean delta = 82 ± 72 ppb) with a subsequent decrease (N = 3). In most patients taking Mepolizumab (N = 6), the FeNO increase was observed between T₁ and T₂ (mean delta = 57 ± 35 ppb). Under treatment, no Benralizumab patient experienced asthma exacerbation while two on Mepolizumab did. All patients had a significant decrease in blood eosinophils.

Conclusion

Although initiation of anti-IL5/IL5R may cause a transient rise in FeNO levels in a subgroup of patients, it does not appear to affect clinical outcomes. A compensatory mechanism involving other inflammatory pathways such as IL13 or IL4, both involved in FeNO production, could theoretically explain these findings. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the actual underlying mechanisms.

The use of the mannitol test as an outcome measure in asthma intervention studies: a review and practical recommendations

BACKGROUND

The mannitol test is an indirect bronchial challenge test widely used in diagnosing asthma. Response to the mannitol test correlates with the level of eosinophilic and mast cell airway inflammation, and a positive mannitol test is highly predictive of a response to anti-inflammatory treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. The response to mannitol is a physiological biomarker that may, therefore, be used to assess the response to other anti-inflammatory treatments and may be of particular interest in early phase studies that require surrogate markers to predict a clinical response. The main objectives of this review were to assess the practical aspects of using mannitol as an endpoint in clinical trials and provide the clinical researcher and respiratory physician with recommendations when designing early clinical trials.

METHODS

The aim of this review was to summarise previous uses of the mannitol test as an outcome measure in clinical intervention studies. The PubMed database was searched using a combination of MeSH and keywords. Eligible studies included intervention or repeatability studies using the standard mannitol test, at multiple timepoints, reporting the use of PD₁₅ as a measure, and published in English.

RESULTS

Of the 193 papers identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and data from these are discussed in detail. Data on the mode of action, correlation with airway inflammation, its diagnostic properties, and repeatability have been summarised, and suggestions for the reporting of test results provided. Worked examples of power calculations for dimensioning study populations are presented for different types of study designs. Finally, interpretation and reporting of the change in the response to the mannitol test are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanistic and practical features of the mannitol test make it a useful marker of disease, not only in clinical diagnoses, but also as an outcome measure in intervention trials. Measuring airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol provides a novel and reproducible test for assessing efficacy in intervention trials, and importantly, utilises a test that links directly to underlying drivers of disease.

[Asthma 2020 Nursing Consensus Document]

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease which presents with a risk of exacerbations. Good patient management and continuous monitoring are crucial for good disease control, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are essential for proper treatment. Nurses specialised in asthma can contribute to the correct management of asthmatic patients. They play a key role in diagnostic tests, administration of medication, and patient follow-up and education. This consensus arose from the need to address an aspect of asthma management that does not appear in the specific recommendations of current guidelines. This document highlights and updates the role of specialized nurses in the care and management of asthma patients, offering conclusions and practical recommendations with the aim of improving their contribution to the treatment of this disease. Proposed recommendations appear as the result of a nominal consensus which was developed during 2019, and validated at the beginning of 2020.

Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma Outcomes

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by variable airflow obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and airway inflammation. Evidence suggests that air pollution has a negative impact on asthma outcomes in both adult and pediatric populations. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the effect of various outdoor and indoor pollutants on asthma outcomes, their burden on its management, as well as to highlight the measures that could result in improved asthma outcomes. Traffic-related air pollution, nitrogen dioxide and second-hand smoking (SHS) exposures represent significant risk factors for asthma development in children. Nevertheless, a causal relation between air pollution and development of adult asthma is not clearly established. Exposure to outdoor pollutants can induce asthma symptoms, exacerbations and decreases in lung function. Active tobacco smoking is associated with poorer asthma control, while exposure to SHS increases the risk of asthma exacerbations, respiratory symptoms and healthcare utilization. Other indoor pollutants such as heating sources and molds can also negatively impact the course of asthma. Global measures, that aim to reduce exposure to air pollutants, are highly needed in order to improve the outcomes and management of adult and pediatric asthma in addition to the existing guidelines.

Randomized controlled trial of triple versus dual inhaler therapy on small airways in smoking asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Smoking worsens underlying asthma inflammation and also induces resistance to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Small airways dysfunction measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) is associated with worse control.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effects on small airways of adding long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) alone or with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) to ICS in asthmatic smokers.

METHODS

Sixteen current smokers were enrolled: mean age 44 year, FEV1 84%, FEF25-75 47%, R5 158%, ACQ 1.69, 20 pack year . Patients were converted to a reference ICS as HFA-BDP during initial run-in at median dose of 800 µg/day. Open label olodaterol 5 µg od (OLO) or olodaterol 5 µg/tiotropium 5 µg od (OLO/TIO) was added to HFA-BDP for median duration of 3 weeks in a randomized cross over design, including run-in and washout periods on HFA-BDP. IOS and spirometry were measured after each treatment (BDP/OLO/TIO or BDP/OLO) and at baseline after run-in and washout (BDP).

RESULTS

After chronic dosing, IOS outcomes at trough except for R20 were all significantly improved with OLO/TIO compared to OLO. For the primary end-point of total airway resistance (as R5), the mean difference (95%CI) at trough was 0.06 (0.015-0.10) kPa/l/s, peripheral airways resistance (as R5-R20) 0.03 (0.003-0.06) kPa/l/s, peripheral lung reactance area (as AX) 0.38 (0.08-0.68) kPa/l and resonant frequency (as RF) 2.28 (0.45-4.12) Hz. FEF25-75 at trough was also better with OLO/TIO vs TIO: 0.93 (0.86 - 0.95) l/s while FEV1 was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS/LABA/LAMA was superior to ICS/LABA on trough small airway outcomes in asthma patients who smoke.

Asthma and Corticosteroid Responses in Childhood and Adult Asthma

Corticosteroids are the most effective treatment for asthma; inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the first-line treatment for children and adults with persistent symptoms. ICSs are associated with significant improvements in lung function. The anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroids are mediated by both genomic and nongenomic factors. Variation in the response to corticosteroids has been observed. Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and genetic features may be used to predict response to ICSs. The existence of multiple mechanisms underlying glucocorticoid insensitivity raises the possibility that this might indeed reflect different diseases with a common phenotype.

Scottish consensus statement on the role of FeNO in adult asthma

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is the only available point of care test to assess type-2 inflammation in asthma. In making a diagnosis of asthma, FeNO should be used together with blood eosinophils and spirometry, alongside a history. Raised FeNO in conjunction with blood eosinophilia are treatable traits of type 2 inflammation in asthma, which in turn may guide personalised management. A FeNO suppression test can be used to assess adherence and device use with ICS therapy. Furthermore FeNO may be used to provide feedback to patients in response to ICS, especially when spirometry is normal. FeNO may facilitate appropriate referral to secondary care for more definitive specialist investigations. In summary, FeNO is cost effective in the diagnosis and management of asthma and should be incorporated into primary and secondary care as part of routine clinical practice.

Challenges in the management of asthma associated with smoking-induced airway diseases

INTRODUCTION

Smoking-induced airway diseases such as chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and small airway dysfunction contribute to the chronic respiratory symptoms experienced by adults with asthma, including those with spirometric chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), termed asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Drug treatment of symptomatic smokers with asthma or ACO is uncertain due to their exclusion from most clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes evidence for the efficacy of small molecule drugs used in the clinic to treat current and former smokers with a diagnostic label of asthma or ACO. Other therapeutic interventions are reviewed, including smoking cessation and biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials and observational studies suggest that smoking cessation and approved drugs used to treat non-smokers with asthma produce clinical benefits in smokers with asthma or ACO, although the overall quality of evidence is low. The efficacy of some treatments for asthma is altered in current smokers, including reduced responsiveness to short-term inhaled corticosteroids and possibly improved responsiveness to leukotriene receptor antagonists. Preliminary findings suggest that low-dose theophylline, statins, and biologics, such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab, may improve clinical outcomes in smokers with asthma or ACO. Improved phenotyping and endotyping of asthma and smoking-induced airway diseases should lead to better targeted therapies.

Extrafine compared to non-extrafine particle inhaled corticosteroids in smokers and ex-smokers with asthma

BACKGROUND

Smoking is as prevalent in asthmatics as in the general population. Asthmatic smokers benefit less from inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) than non-smoking asthmatics, possibly due to more smoking-induced small airways disease. Thus targeting small airways may be important in treating asthmatic (ex-)smokers. We hypothesized that extrafine particle ICS improve small airways function more than non-extrafine particle ICS in asthmatic (ex-)smokers.

METHODS

We performed an open-label, randomized, three-way cross-over study comparing extrafine beclomethasone (HFA-QVAR) to non-extrafine beclomethasone (HFA-Clenil) and fluticasone (HFA-Flixotide) in 22 smokers and 21 ex-smokers with asthma (?5 packyears).

RESULTS

Improvement from baseline in PD₂₀ adenosine after using QVAR, Clenil or Flixotide was 1.04 ± 1.71, 1.09 ± 2.12 and 0.94 ± 1.97 doubling doses, mean ± standard deviation (SD), respectively. The change from baseline in R₅-R₂₀ at PD₂₀ adenosine after using QVAR, Clenil or Flixotide was ?0.02 ± 0.27, 0.02 ± 0.21, and ?0.02 ± 0.31 kPa sL^?1, mean ± SD, respectively. The change in PD₂₀ adenosine and R₅-R₂₀ at PD₂₀ adenosine were neither statistically significant different between QVAR and Clenil (p = 0.86 and p = 0.82) nor between QVAR and Flixotide (p = 0.50 and p = 0.96).

CONCLUSION

Similar effectiveness in improving small airways function was found for extrafine and non-extrafine particle ICS treatment for asthmatic smokers and ex-smokers.

Asthma and smoking-induced airway disease without spirometric COPD

Due to the high prevalence rates of cigarette smoking and asthma, current and ex-smokers frequently develop chronic airway disease without spirometric evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), either alone or associated with asthma. This review considers the classification, clinical outcomes, inflammatory and imaging variables, phenotypes, and management of current and ex-smokers with airway disease without COPD, focusing on overlaps in those with and without asthma. These individuals have more respiratory symptoms, worse quality of life, increased exacerbation rates, reduced lung function and more comorbidities than never-smokers with asthma or healthy never-smokers. As well as clinical features, airway inflammatory and structural changes in smoking-induced airway disease without COPD overlap with those found in smokers with asthma. Cigarette smoking is associated with worse clinical outcomes in some phenotypes of asthma. Management involves public health measures to control exposure to tobacco smoke, personal advice on smoking cessation and the use of appropriate targeted therapies, although evidence is limited on their effectiveness. Understanding the mechanisms, natural history and management of current and ex-smokers with asthma and smoking-induced airway disease without COPD is a priority for future research.

Smoking cessation strategies for patients with asthma: improving patient outcomes

Smoking is common in adults with asthma, yet a paucity of literature exists on smoking cessation strategies specifically targeting this subgroup. Adverse respiratory effects from personal smoking include worse asthma control and a predisposition to lower lung function and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Some data suggest that individuals with asthma are more likely than their non-asthmatic peers to smoke regularly at an earlier age. While quit attempts can be more frequent in smokers with asthma, they are also of shorter duration than in non-asthmatics. Considering these asthma-specific characteristics is important in order to individualize smoking cessation strategies. In particular, asthma-specific information such as "lung age" should be provided and longer-term follow-up is advised. Promising emerging strategies include reminders by cellular phone and web-based interventions using consumer health informatics. For adolescents, training older peers to deliver asthma education is another promising strategy. For smokers who are hospitalized for asthma, inpatient nicotine replacement therapy and counseling are a priority. Overall, improving smoking cessation rates in smokers with asthma may rely on a more personalized approach, with the potential for substantial health benefits to individuals and the population at large.

A 12-year prognosis of adult-onset asthma: Seinäjoki Adult Asthma Study

RATIONALE

Long-term prognosis of adult-onset asthma is poorly known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 12-year prognosis of adult-onset asthma and the factors associated with disease prognosis.

METHODS

Seinäjoki Adult-onset Asthma Study (SAAS) is a 12-year real-life single-center follow-up study of new-onset asthma diagnosed at adult age and treated in primary and specialized care. Remission was defined by no symptoms and no asthma medication use for 6 months. Asthma control was evaluated according to Global Initiative for Asthma 2010. Factors associated with current asthma control were analyzed by multinomial multivariate logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 203 patients (79% of the baseline population) were followed for 12 years. Remission occurred in 6 (3%) patients. In 34% asthma was controlled, in 36% it was partially controlled and in 30% uncontrolled. Uncontrolled asthma was predicted by elevated body-mass index at baseline, smoking (pack-years) and current allergic or persistent rhinitis. Elevated blood eosinophils and good lung function (FEV1) at baseline protected from uncontrolled asthma. In contrast, gender, age at the onset or baseline symptoms (Airways Questionnaire 20) were not significant predictors of uncontrolled disease.

CONCLUSIONS

During a 12-year follow-up, remission of adult-onset asthma was rare occurring in only 3% of patients. The majority of patients (66%) presented either with uncontrolled or partially controlled asthma. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number NCT02733016.

The management of asthmatic smokers

Asthma is still a major public health problem in most countries; new strategies to better control this disease are necessary. Such strategies must include predisposing factors. One of these factors is smoking and a significant fraction of asthmatics are smokers. However, clinical trials studying new drugs or newer therapeutic regimens for asthma generally exclude smokers. Therefore, there is a lack of specific information about the treatment of asthma in smokers. The asthmatic smoker is a special phenotype with important therapeutic and prognostic clinical implications. Any form of tobacco use, especially cigarette smoking, plays an important role in this disease. Asthmatic smokers are prone to several negative outcomes. Smoking cessation results in an improvement of symptoms and pulmonary functioning. Counselling and first-line medications for smoking cessation (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion and varenicline) significantly increase quitting rates. The role of electronic cigarettes in this group of patients has only begun to be studied. The treatment of asthmatics that smoke has characteristics that need must be well understood by clinicians, especially the poor response to corticosteroids. This condition is not universal and physicians should always consider its inclusion in the treatment of these patients. The association of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus a long-acting beta2 adrenegic (LABA) by smoking asthmatics results in more pronounced improvement in several asthma outcomes compared with the use of corticosteroid alone. Inhaled corticosteroids in extra-fine particles associated with LABA may be a new perspective of treatment. Also the use of leukotriene antagonists may become another therapeutic alternative. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the challenges faced by clinicians to control asthma in smokers and to present methods of coping with smoking treatment and avoiding relapses.

Randomized trial of allergen-induced asthmatic response in smokers and non-smokers: effects of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

It is thought that asthmatics who smoke cigarettes respond less well to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy than asthmatics who do not smoke.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of smoking on allergen-induced airway responses in asthmatics treated with ICS.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, crossover study evaluating twice daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 μg, FP 500 μg and placebo, for 7 days, on allergen-induced asthmatic responses in 18 non-smoking and 17 smoking atopic asthmatics (NCT01400906). At 1 h post-morning dose on Day 6, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 ) was measured up to 10 h post-challenge. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), induced sputum cell counts, and responsiveness to methacholine were assessed the following day.

RESULTS

The late asthmatic response (LAR) was suppressed by FP in smokers and non-smokers; with placebo, the LAR was also attenuated in smokers versus non-smokers (adjusted mean minimum change in FEV1 (L) over 4-10 h [95% CI] in non-smokers: placebo -1.01 [1.31, 0.70], FP 100 μg -0.38 [0.54, 0.22], FP 500 μg -0.35 [0.54-0.22]; and in smokers: placebo -0.63 [0.84, 0.43]; FP 100 μg -0.44 [0.65, 0.23]; FP 500 μg -0.46 [0.59-0.32]). The Early AR was suppressed by FP treatment in non-smokers, but was not impacted in smokers. The reduction in methacholine hyperresponsiveness after FP was greater in non-smokers (1.5- and twofold doubling dose difference from placebo after FP 100 μg and FP 500 μg) than smokers (1.0 and 1.3 difference, respectively). Allergen-induced increases in eNO and sputum eosinophils were lower in smokers than non-smokers and were suppressed in both groups by FP.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Allergen-induced LARs were of a similar amplitude in both smoking and non-smoking atopic asthmatics at the end of ICS treatment, but attenuation of the LAR in smokers was only partly associated with ICS treatment. The marked attenuation of the LAR observed in smokers in the absence of ICS treatment is a novel observation.

Smoking asthma phenotype: diagnostic and management challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The prevalence of active smoking in adults with asthma is similar to the general population. Smoking asthma is associated with poorer disease control, impaired response to corticosteroid therapy, accelerated decline in lung function, and increased rate of healthcare utilization. Current asthma guidelines do not provide specific treatment advice for smoking asthmatic patients. There is an urgent need for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and effective treatment for smoking asthmatic patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

An association between both active and passive smoking and adult-onset asthma is supported by many studies.The asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) has recently gained particular interest and smoking asthmatic patients should be evaluated for ACOS.Treatment regimens for smoking asthma include higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), extrafine particle ICS formulations, antileukotrienes, and combinations of these options.Asthma is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular comorbidities whereas smoking is an additional strong independent risk factor for pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. Tobacco smoking and not asthma per se seems to be the reason of poor prognosis, especially with regard to lung cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality in asthmatic patients.

SUMMARY

Smoking asthma represents a common challenge to the clinician both in terms of diagnosis and management. These aspects have not been thoroughly evaluated and deserve further investigation.

Use of asthma control indicators in measuring inhaled corticosteroid effectiveness in asthmatic smokers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to explore how current research measures the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in smokers with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched for combinations of terms relating to asthma, tobacco use and ICS effectiveness.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The search was limited to articles published between 2004 and 2015, in English language. Studies met inclusion criteria if reporting the use of guideline-based asthma control indicators to measure the therapeutic effects of ICS or ICS combination therapies. This review did not exclude articles based on study design. Data were extracted and summarized to describe how indicators were measured across studies in order to characterize and describe the effects of ICS in smokers.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in this review. Six of these 13 studies used only one indicator to measure asthma control in smokers and ICS was found to improve asthma in only one of six of these studies. Of studies evaluating combination therapy, three of four studies reported a therapeutic benefit to smokers. In these studies of combination therapy multiple indicators of control were measured to assess drug effects.

CONCLUSIONS

To assess the therapeutic benefit of ICS drugs in smokers, multiple indicators should be measured to determine if current therapy is improving asthma control. Asthma therapy should then be adjusted based on the patient's current asthma status. The development of clinical treatment guidelines for asthmatic smokers may help clinicians make best-practice, evidence-based recommendations in order to optimize care for these patients.

Prognosis of new-onset asthma diagnosed at adult age

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common chronic disease, which can affect patients at any age. Recently, cluster analyses have suggested that patients with asthma can be divided into different phenotypes and that the age at the onset of the disease is a critical defining factor. The prognosis of allergic childhood-onset asthma is relatively well known, whereas the prognosis of adult-onset asthma remains unclear.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review to identify studies that evaluated the long-term prognosis of new-onset asthma diagnosed at adult age. Criteria used (set 1) were: 1. adult-onset asthma, 2. physician diagnosed asthma (including objective lung-functions) < 1 year before the first visit, 3. follow-up time of at least 5 years, 4. objective lung function measurements used at follow-up and 5. not a comparative trial. Another set of studies (set 2) with less strict criteria were gathered.

RESULTS

The main result of this systematic review is that the amount of evidence on the prognosis of new-onset asthma diagnosed at adult age is very limited. Only one study (n = 250) fulfilled the criteria (set 1) and it suggests that the five-year prognosis of new-onset asthma diagnosed at adult age may not be favorable, the proportion of patients being in remission was less than 5%. Furthermore, six additional follow-up studies (n = 964) were identified including mainly patients with adult-onset asthma (set 2). These studies had variable endpoints and the results could not be combined.

CONCLUSION

Further follow-up studies that recruit patients with new-onset adult asthma are needed to understand the prognostic factors in adult-onset asthma.

Angiopoietins 1 and 2 in sputum supernatant of optimally treated asthmatics: the effect of smoking

BACKGROUND

Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) is an essential mediator of angiogenesis by establishing vascular integrity, whereas angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) acts as its natural inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the levels of angiopoietins in sputum supernatants of patients with optimally treated asthma and to investigate whether smoking represents a significant covariate on the above possible processes.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with asthma (42 smokers) and 28 healthy subjects (14 smokers) were studied. All subjects underwent lung function tests, bronchial hyper-responsiveness assessment and sputum induction for cell count identification and measurement of Ang-1, Ang-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, TGF-β1, MMP-2, IL-13, Eosinophilic cationic protein and IL-8 in supernatants. Airway vascular permeability (AVP) index was also assessed.

RESULTS

Ang-1 (ng/mL) levels were significantly higher in patients with asthma compared to normal subjects. Smoking significantly increased Ang-1 levels [median, interquartile ranges 24 (13-37) in smoking asthmatics vs 10 (7-14) in nonsmoking asthmatics vs 5·3 (3·7-6·5) and 4·6 (3·8-5·7) in healthy smokers and nonsmokers, respectively, P < 0·001]. Similar results were observed for Ang-2 (pg/mL) [168 (132-203) vs 124 (82-152) vs 94 (78-113) vs 100 (96-108), respectively, P < 0·001]. Regression analysis in the whole study population showed a significant negative association for Ang-1, with AVP index, and MMP-2. Smoking was a significant covariate for both Ang-1 and Ang-2 in asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels are upregulated in patients with optimally treated asthma. Our data support a possible role for smoking in the angiogenetic process in asthma.

Bronchoprovocation tests in asthma: direct versus indirect challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes different bronchoprovocation tests and their merits in diagnosing asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

A new indirect challenge test using dry powder mannitol has been made available and has been systematically validated and tested in different populations.

SUMMARY

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, and its measurement using direct inhalation challenges, particularly with inhaled methacholine or histamine, or indirect challenges using stimuli such as exercise, dry air hyperpnea, distilled water, hypertonic saline and mannitol, and the pharmacological agent adenosine monophosphate is important in establishing a correct diagnosis. Direct challenge tests are sensitive and have a high negative predictive value to exclude asthma. This is particularly true in excluding asthma as a diagnosis in patients with symptoms that suggest asthma, but are caused by another condition. Indirect AHR correlates better with eosinophilic airway inflammation. Therefore, indirect challenge tests are seen as more specific. A newer indirect challenge test that uses a kit containing prepacked capsules of dry powder mannitol in different doses is safe and efficient to use. Indirect challenge tests are superior to direct challenge tests to confirm the presence of asthma.

Passive smoking impairs histone deacetylase-2 in children with severe asthma

Background:

Parental smoking is known to worsen asthma symptoms in children and to make them refractory to asthma treatment, but the molecular mechanism is unclear. Oxidative stress from tobacco smoke has been reported to impair histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) via phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt activation and, thus, to reduce corticosteroid sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate passive smoking-dependent molecular abnormalities in alveolar macrophages (AMs) by comparing passive smoke-exposed children and non-passive smoke-exposed children with uncontrolled severe asthma.

Methods:

BAL fluid (BALF) was obtained from 19 children with uncontrolled severe asthma (10 non-passive smoking-exposed subjects and nine passive smoking-exposed subjects), and HDAC2 expression/activity, Akt/HDAC2 phosphorylation levels, and corticosteroid responsiveness in AMs were evaluated.

Results:

Parental smoking reduced HDAC2 protein expression by 54% and activity by 47%, with concomitant enhancement of phosphorylation of Akt1 and HDAC2. In addition, phosphorylation levels of Akt1 correlated positively with HDAC2 phosphorylation levels and negatively with HDAC2 activity. Furthermore, passive smoke exposure reduced the inhibitory effects of dexamethasone on tumor necrosis factor-α-induced CXCL8 release in AMs. There were relatively higher neutrophil counts and CXCL8 concentrations in BALF and lower Asthma Control Test scores compared with non-passive smoke-exposed children with uncontrolled severe asthma.

Conclusions:

Passive smoking impairs HDAC2 function via PI3K signaling activation, which could contribute to corticosteroid-insensitive inflammation in children with severe asthma. This novel mechanism will be a treatment target in children with severe asthma and stresses the need for a smoke-free environment for asthmatic children.

Integrating evidence for managing asthma in patients who smoke

Cigarette smoking among asthma patients is associated with worsening symptoms and accelerated decline in lung function. Smoking asthma is also characterized by increased levels of neutrophils and macrophages, and greater small airway remodeling, resulting in increased airflow obstruction and impaired response to corticosteroid therapy. As a result, smokers are typically excluded from asthma randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The strict inclusion/exclusion criteria used by asthma RCTs limits the extent to which their findings can be extrapolated to the routine care asthma population and to reflect the likely effectiveness of therapies in subgroups of particular clinical interest, such as smoking asthmatics. The inclusion of smokers in observational asthma studies and pragmatic trials in asthma provides a way of assessing the relative effectiveness of different treatment options for the management of this interesting clinical subgroup. Exploratory studies of possible treatment options for smoking asthma suggest potential utility in: prescribing higher-dose ICS; targeting the small airways of the lungs with extra-fine particle ICS formulations; targeting leukotreines, and possibly also combinations of these options. However, further studies are required. With the paucity of RCT data available, complementary streams of evidence (those from RCTs, pragmatic trials and observational studies) need to be combined to help guide judicious prescribing decisions in smokers with asthma.

Emerging role of long acting muscarinic antagonists for asthma

Acetlycholine is involved in the control of airway smooth muscle constriction and in recruitment of inflammatory cells via neuronal and paracrine effects on muscarinic type 3 receptors. Long acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are well established in guidelines for COPD but are not currently licensed for use in asthma. There are emerging data from key clinical trials to show that LAMA may confer bronchodilator effects and improved control when used in addition to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) alone or in conjunction with long acting β-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA). Further studies in persistent asthmatic patients are required to evaluate ICS sparing effects of LAMA looking particularly at airway hyper-responsiveness and surrogate inflammatory markers, in addition to evaluation of possible synergy between LAMA and LABA when given together. Future possible development of combination inhalers comprising ICS/LAMA or ICS/LAMA/LABA will require long term studies looking at asthma control and exacerbations in both adult and paediatric patients.

Smoking influences response to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of smoking on efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatics.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective/retrospective, controlled studies published up to May 2012 in smokers versus non-smokers with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) were retrieved from PubMed, Highwire and Embase databases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were pulmonary function parameters [FEV(1) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), a.m. PEF (a.m. peak expiratory flow) and p.m. PEF (p.m. peak expiratory flow)]. Secondary outcomes included differential eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood, asthma control questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) and concomitant use of medication. Pooled SMDs (standardized mean differences) were estimated by using a random-effect model and a fixed-effect model based on between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 242 studies identified, ten (N = 4070) met the inclusion criteria (seven of budesonide-based interventions, two of fluticasone and one unknown ICS trial). Both smokers and non-smokers were similar in age and baseline FEV(1). Smoking yielded considerably reduced mean change in FEV(1) [SMD = -0.197, 95% CI: (-0.327, -0.066), p = 0.003], morning PEF [SMD = -0.796, 95% CI: (-1.047, -0.545), p < 0.001], night-time PEF [SMD = -0.501, 95% CI: (-0.797, -0.204), p = 0.001] and post-treatment FEV(1) [SMD = -0.178, 95% CI: (-0.309, -0.046), p = 0.008] and increased use of concomitant medications [SMD = 0.537, 95% CI: (0.166, 0.908), p = 0.005] in smokers, but not non-smokers with asthma, although there was no statistical difference in allergy-related endpoints and asthma score (ACQ-5).

CONCLUSION

Smoking is associated with attenuated response to inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatics. This offers a rationale for persuasion of smoking cessation. Treatment outcomes might be improved by smoking cessation leading to improved lung function and ameliorated symptoms.