Impact of Sepsis on Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is among the leading causes of death in the United States, and patients undergoing surgical procedures are at greater risk for infectious complications. The incidence of sepsis and its association with outcomes among patients undergoing surgical procedures in various specialties were investigated. Additionally, the infectious sources and associated primary procedures were reported for sepsis-related deaths.

METHODS

Patients undergoing procedures performed by surgical services at our academic medical center between January 2010 and June 2013 were reviewed. Sepsis was identified by the assignment of related ICD-9-CM billing codes. Patient outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay, and death. A subset of sepsis-related deaths was reviewed further for infectious sources and primary procedure codes.

RESULTS

A total of 25,522 patients underwent a procedure by a surgical service, and sepsis developed in 863 patients (3.38%) during their hospital stays. Overall, patients with sepsis had significantly longer hospital and ICU stays, greater likelihood of ICU admission, and a higher mortality rate. The incidence of sepsis was highest in patients with procedures performed by cardiothoracic surgery (8.39%), trauma/acute care surgery (7.55%), and plastic/reconstructive surgery (5.35%). Sepsis was associated with a significant increase in the mortality rate among vascular surgery, trauma/acute care surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery patients. The most common infectious sources in sepsis-related deaths were pulmonary infections (39.5%), blood stream infections (35.1%), and gastrointestinal infections (31.6%). The procedures associated with the greatest number of sepsis-related deaths were extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, small bowel resection, and insertion of implantable heart-assist systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Sepsis is not an uncommon condition and is associated with longer hospital and ICU stays, greater likelihood of ICU admission, and a higher mortality rate. Accurate benchmarking of sepsis is essential for the development and monitoring of sepsis-reduction quality-improvement initiatives.

Hospital readmission and healthcare utilization following sepsis in community settings

BACKGROUND

Sepsis, the most expensive cause of hospitalization in the United States, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, healthcare utilization patterns following sepsis are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To identify patient-level factors that contribute to postsepsis mortality and healthcare utilization.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS

A retrospective study of sepsis patients drawn from 21 community-based hospitals in Kaiser Permanente Northern California in 2010.

MEASUREMENTS

We determined 1-year survival and use of outpatient and facility-based healthcare before and after sepsis and used logistic regression to identify the factors that contributed to early readmission (within 30 days) and high utilization (≥ 15% of living days spent in facility-based care).

RESULTS

Among 6344 sepsis patients, 5479 (86.4%) survived to hospital discharge. Mean age was 72 years with 28.9% of patients aged <65 years. Postsepsis survival was strongly modified by age; 1-year survival was 94.1% for <45 year olds and 54.4% for ≥ 85 year olds. A total of 978 (17.9%) patients were readmitted within 30 days; only a minority of all rehospitalizations were for infection. After sepsis, adjusted healthcare utilization increased nearly 3-fold compared with presepsis levels and was strongly modified by age. Patient factors including acute severity of illness, hospital length of stay, and the need for intensive care were associated with early readmission and high healthcare utilization; however, the dominant factors explaining variability-comorbid disease burden and high presepsis utilization-were present prior to sepsis admission.

CONCLUSION

Postsepsis survival and healthcare utilization were most strongly influenced by patient factors already present prior to sepsis hospitalization.

Temporal trends, practice patterns, and treatment outcomes for infected upper urinary tract stones in the United States

BACKGROUND

The incidence of infected urolithiasis is unknown, and evidence describing the optimal management strategy for obstruction is equivocal.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the trends of infected urolithiasis in the United States, the practice patterns of competing treatment modalities, and to compare adverse outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A weighted estimate of 396385 adult patients hospitalized with infected urolithiasis was extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1999-2009.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Time trend analysis examined the incidence of infected urolithiasis and associated sepsis, as well as rates of retrograde ureteral catheterization and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for urgent/emergent decompression. Propensity-score matching compared the rates of adverse outcomes between approaches.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Between 1999 and 2009, the incidence of infected urolithiasis in women increased from 15.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-15.6) to 27.6 (27.4-27.8)/100 000); men increased from 7.8 (7.7-7.9) to 12.1 (12.0-12.3)/100000. Rates of associated sepsis increased from 6.9% to 8.5% (p=0.013), and severe sepsis increased from 1.7% to 3.2% (p<0.001); mortality rates remained stable at 0.25-0.20% (p=0.150). Among those undergoing immediate decompression, 113 459 (28.6%), PCN utilization decreased from 16.1% to 11.2% (p=0.001), with significant regional variability. In matched analysis, PCN showed higher rates of sepsis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% CI, 1.52-1.74), severe sepsis (OR: 2.28; 95% CI, 2.06-2.52), prolonged length of stay (OR: 3.18; 95% CI, 3.01-3.34), elevated hospital charges (OR: 2.71; 95%CI, 2.57-2.85), and mortality (OR: 3.14; 95%CI, 13-4.63). However, observational data preclude the assessment of timing between outcome and intervention, and disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1999 and 2009, women were twice as likely to have infected urolithiasis. Rates of associated sepsis and severe sepsis increased, but mortality rates remained stable. Analysis of competing treatment strategies for immediate decompression demonstrates decreasing utilization of PCN, which showed higher rates of adverse outcomes. These findings should be viewed as preliminary and hypothesis generating, demonstrating the pressing need for further study.