Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge

Loss of bronchoprotection with ICS plus LABA treatment, β-receptor dynamics, and the effect of alendronate

BACKGROUND

Loss of bronchoprotection (LOBP) with a regularly used long-acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonist (LABA) is well documented. LOBP has been attributed to β2-adrenergic receptor (B2AR) downregulation, a process requiring farnesylation, which is inhibited by alendronate.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether alendronate can reduce LABA-associated LOBP in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-treated patients.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design, proof-of-concept trial. Seventy-eight participants with persistent asthma receiving 250 μg of fluticasone twice daily for 2 weeks were randomized to receive alendronate or placebo while initiating salmeterol for 8 weeks. Salmeterol-protected methacholine challenges (SPMChs) and PBMC B2AR numbers (radioligand binding assay) and signaling (cyclic AMP ELISA) were assessed before randomization and after 8 weeks of ICS plus LABA treatment. LOBP was defined as a more than 1 doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value.

RESULTS

The mean doubling dose reduction in SPMCh PC20 value was 0.50 and 0.27 with alendronate and placebo, respectively (P = .62). Thirty-eight percent of participants receiving alendronate and 33% receiving placebo had LOBP (P = .81). The after/before ICS plus LABA treatment ratio of B2AR number was 1.0 for alendronate (P = .86) and 0.8 for placebo (P = .15; P = .31 for difference between treatments). The B2AR signaling ratio was 0.89 for alendronate (P = .43) and 1.02 for placebo (P = .84; P = .44 for difference). Changes in lung function and B2AR number and signaling were similar between those who did and did not experience LOBP.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find evidence that alendronate reduces LABA-associated LOBP, which relates to the occurrence of LOBP in only one third of participants. LOBP appears to be less common than presumed in concomitant ICS plus LABA-treated asthmatic patients. B2AR downregulation measured in PBMCs does not appear to reflect LOBP.

Mast cells in asthma--state of the art

Mast cells (MCs) play a central role in tissue homoeostasis, sensing the local environment through numerous innate cell surface receptors. This enables them to respond rapidly to perceived tissue insults with a view to initiating a co-ordinated programme of inflammation and repair. However, when the tissue insult is chronic, the ongoing release of multiple pro-inflammatory mediators, proteases, cytokines and chemokines leads to tissue damage and remodelling. In asthma, there is strong evidence of ongoing MC activation, and their mediators and cell-cell signals are capable of regulating many facets of asthma pathophysiology. This article reviews the evidence behind this.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction update-2016

The first practice parameter on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) was published in 2010. This updated practice parameter was prepared 5 years later. In the ensuing years, there has been increased understanding of the pathogenesis of EIB and improved diagnosis of this disorder by using objective testing. At the time of this publication, observations included the following: dry powder mannitol for inhalation as a bronchial provocation test is FDA approved however not currently available in the United States; if baseline pulmonary function test results are normal to near normal (before and after bronchodilator) in a person with suspected EIB, then further testing should be performed by using standardized exercise challenge or eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH); and the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical interventions (omega-3 fatty acids) has been challenged. The workgroup preparing this practice parameter updated contemporary practice guidelines based on a current systematic literature review. The group obtained supplementary literature and consensus expert opinions when the published literature was insufficient. A search of the medical literature on PubMed was conducted, and search terms included pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and therapy (both pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical) of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction or exercise-induced asthma (which is no longer a preferred term); asthma; and exercise and asthma. References assessed as relevant to the topic were evaluated to search for additional relevant references. Published clinical studies were appraised by category of evidence and used to document the strength of the recommendation. The parameter was then evaluated by Joint Task Force reviewers and then by reviewers assigned by the parent organizations, as well as the general membership. Based on this process, the parameter can be characterized as an evidence- and consensus-based document.

Bidirectional Counterregulation of Human Lung Mast Cell and Airway Smooth Muscle β2 Adrenoceptors

Human lung mast cells (HLMCs) play a central role in asthma pathogenesis through their relocation to the airway smooth muscle (ASM) bundles. β2 adrenoceptor (β2-AR)-agonists are used to relieve bronchoconstriction in asthma, but may reduce asthma control, particularly when used as monotherapy. We hypothesized that HLMC and human ASM cell (HASMC) responsiveness to β2-AR agonists would be attenuated when HLMCs are in contact with HASMCs. Cells were cultured in the presence of the short-acting β2-agonist albuterol, and the long-acting β2-agonists formoterol and olodaterol. Constitutive and FcεRI-dependent HLMC histamine release, HASMC contraction, and β2-AR phosphorylation at Tyr(350) were assessed. Constitutive HLMC histamine release was increased in HLMC-HASMC coculture and this was enhanced by β2-AR agonists. Inhibition of FcεRI-dependent HLMC mediator release by β2-agonists was greatly reduced in HLMC-HASMC coculture. These effects were reversed by neutralization of stem cell factor (SCF) or cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1). β2-AR agonists did not prevent HASMC contraction when HLMCs were present, but this was reversed by fluticasone. β2-AR phosphorylation at Tyr(350) occurred within 5 min in both HLMCs and HASMCs when the cells were cocultured, and was inhibited by neutralizing SCF or CADM1. HLMC interactions with HASMCs via CADM1 and Kit inhibit the potentially beneficial effects of β2-AR agonists on these cells via phosphorylation of the β2-AR. These results may explain the potentially adverse effects of β2-ARs agonists when used for asthma therapy. Targeting SCF and CADM1 may enhance β2-AR efficacy, particularly in corticosteroid-resistant patients.

Mast cells in airway diseases and interstitial lung disease

Mast cells are major effector cells of inflammation and there is strong evidence that mast cells play a significant role in asthma pathophysiology. There is also a growing body of evidence that mast cells contribute to other inflammatory and fibrotic lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This review discusses the role that mast cells play in airway diseases and highlights how mast cell microlocalisation within specific lung compartments and their cellular interactions are likely to be critical for their effector function in disease.

Are inhaled longacting β2 agonists detrimental to asthma?

Possible adverse effects of adrenergic bronchodilators in asthma have been the subject of discussion for more than half a century, with recent intense debate about the safety of longacting β agonists (LABAs). In this Debate, we consider the issues of bronchodilator and bronchoprotective tolerance resulting from the frequent use of bronchodilators, which is noted particularly with shortacting drugs, but has also been shown to occur quicker and to a greater extent with LABAs. Increased allergen responsiveness and masking allowing inflammation to increase, while symptoms and lung function remain apparently controlled, have also been observed. Studies in which LABAs were used as monotherapy were associated with increased mortality. However, several studies have shown the benefits of adding LABAs to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Meta-analyses of asthma clinical trials involving LABAs showed that, when given with mandatory ICS, LABAs were not associated with an increased risk of death, intubations, or hospital admission for exacerbations when compared with use of the same dose of ICS only. Withdrawal of LABA therapy once symptom control is achieved is often associated with subsequent loss of symptom control. When used for appropriate indications, LABAs should be combined with ICS in one inhaler so that monotherapy is not possible.

CRACM/Orai ion channel expression and function in human lung mast cells

BACKGROUND

Influx of extracellular Ca(2+) into human lung mast cells (HLMCs) is essential for the FcεRI-dependent release of preformed granule-derived mediators and newly synthesized autacoids and cytokines. However, the identity of the ion channels underlying this Ca(2+) influx is unknown. The recently discovered members of the CRACM/Orai ion channel family that carries the Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) current are candidates.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the expression and function of CRACM channels in HLMCs.

METHODS

CRACM mRNA, protein, and functional expression were examined in purified HLMCs and isolated human bronchus.

RESULTS

CRACM1, -2, and -3 mRNA transcripts and CRACM1 and -2 proteins were detectable in HLMCs. A CRACM-like current was detected following FcεRI-dependent HLMC activation and also in HLMCs dialyzed with 30 μM inositol triphosphate. The Ca(2+)-selective current obtained under both conditions was blocked by 10 μM La(3+) and Gd(3+), known blockers of CRACM channels, and 2 distinct and specific CRACM-channel blockers-GSK-7975A and Synta-66. Both blockers reduced FcεRI-dependent Ca(2+) influx, and 3 μM GSK-7975A and Synta-66 reduced the release of histamine, leukotriene C(4), and cytokines (IL-5/-8/-13 and TNFα) by up to 50%. Synta-66 also inhibited allergen-dependent bronchial smooth muscle contraction in ex vivo tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of CRACM channels, a CRACM-like current, and functional inhibition of HLMC Ca(2+) influx, mediator release, and allergen-induced bronchial smooth muscle contraction by CRACM-channel blockers supports a role for CRACM channels in FcεRI-dependent HLMC secretion. CRACM channels are therefore a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of asthma and related allergic diseases.

Mast cells in lung inflammation

Mast cells play an important role in the lung in both health and disease. Their primary role is to initiate an appropriate program of inflammation and repair in response to tissue damage initiated by a variety of diverse stimuli. They are important for host immunity against bacterial infection and potentially in the host immune response to non small cell lung cancer. In situations of ongoing tissue damage, the sustained release of numerous pro-inflammatory mediators, proteases and cytokines, contributes to the pathophysiology of lung diseases such as asthma and interstitial lung disease. A key goal is the development of treatments which attenuate adverse mast cell function when administered chronically to humans in vivo. Such therapies may offer a novel approach to the treatment of many life-threatening diseases.

Role of arformoterol in the management of COPD

Formoterol is a beta2-agonist that has both short and long acting bronchodilator effects. Beta2-agonists used as bronchodilators have been synthesized as racemates that comprise (R,R) and (S,S)-enantiomers. Compounds that are beta2-selective derive their bronchodilator effect from an interaction between the (R,R)-enantiomer and the beta2-adrenoceptor. Arformoterol is the (R,R)-enantiomer and is distinguished from the more commonly used racemic (RR/S,S)-diasteriomer of formoterol. Overall literature on the use of arformoterol in COPD is very preliminary. There is some in vitro data that demonstrate significant bronchodilation and inhibition of inflammation with arformoterol, and these effects may be more pronounced than those caused by racemic formoterol. There are limited clinical trial data that demonstrate that arformoterol produces significant improvement in lung function in COPD; however, many of the subjects involved had marked baseline airway reversibility. Arformoterol has been very well tolerated in clinical trials and could potentially be used only once every 24 hours (due to its prolonged effect). It can only be given in nebulized form. Arformoterol can potentially be given with other inhaled medications.

Beta2-agonists and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, and individuals with this disease respond to a range of physiological and chemical insults that are otherwise innocuous to healthy subjects, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are characteristic of the asthma phenotype. BHR can be increased following exposure to environmental allergens in suitably sensitized individuals, pollutants, and certain viruses and can also be exacerbated by exposure to certain drugs, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and beta-blockers. Although beta2-agonists administered acutely remain the treatment for the symptoms of asthma, paradoxically, regular treatment with these drugs can result in an increase in BHR, and this has been suggested to contribute to the increase in asthma morbidity and mortality that has been reported by numerous investigators. This article highlights our current understanding of this phenomenon and examines the potential mechanisms responsible for this effect.

Beta2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma

Beta2-agonists taken immediately before exercise provide significant protection against exercise- induced asthma (EIA) in most patients. However, when they are taken daily, there are some negative aspects regarding severity, control, and recovery from EIA. First, there is a significant minority (15-20%) of asthmatics whose EIA is not prevented by beta2-agonists, even when inhaled corticosteroids are used concomitantly. Second, with daily use, there is a decline in duration of the protective effect of long-acting beta2-agonists. Third, if breakthrough EIA occurs, recovery of lung function is slower in response to a beta2-agonist, and additional doses are often required to achieve pre-exercise values. If a person who takes a beta2-agonist daily experiences problems with exercise, then the physician should consider changing the treatment regimen to achieve better control of EIA. These problems likely result from desensitization of the beta2-receptor on the mast cell, which enhances mediator release, and on the bronchial smooth muscle, which enhances the bronchoconstrictor response and delays recovery from EIA. These effects are reversed within 72 h after cessation of a beta2-agonists. The important clinical question is: Are we actually compromising the beneficial effects of beta2-agonists on the prevention and recovery from EIA by prescribing them daily? Patients with EIA need to ensure that their doses of inhaled corticosteroid or other anti-inflammatory therapy are optimized so that, if necessary, a beta2-agonist can be used intermittently as prophylactic medication with greater confidence in the outcome.

Effect of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol therapy on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels in patients with pollen-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

There has been concern that in allergic asthmatic patients there might be an interactive effect on inflammation between regular salmeterol use and exposure to allergens, resulting in increased airway responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) levels in allergic asthmatic patients concomitantly taking inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Forty-two asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to treatment with fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (n=21) or fluticasone propionate alone (n=21). Spirometry, the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20), the adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) PC20, and ENO levels were measured before and at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Changes in the methacholine PC20, the AMP PC20, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. No significant changes in the AMP PC20 were observed among the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and fluticasone propionate groups during natural pollen exposure. However, a significant increase in the methacholine PC20 was observed in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group (P = .03) and in the fluticasone propionate group (P = .04); ENO concentrations decreased significantly in both groups during natural allergen exposure (P = .009 and .005).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pollen-induced asthma, treatment with either fluticasone propionate or fluticasone propionate-salmeterol is associated with significant reductions in methacholine responsiveness and ENO concentrations, even during natural pollen exposure. Furthermore, at least in patients with mild asthma, natural allergen exposure and the regular use of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO levels and airway responsiveness than natural allergen exposure and fluticasone propionate use alone.

Minimal tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone combination on allergene challenge

In order to assess whether the administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (50/250 mcg by Diskus) for 1 week induces tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge, a single-blind, cross-over study was carried out. We studied nine subjects (eight men and one woman; mean age+/-SD: 31.3+/-11.0 yr) with mild intermittent allergic asthma, never treated with regular beta2-agonists or inhaled corticosteroids. In a previous allergen challenge all subjects had shown a positive early airway response (EAR) to allergen. They underwent allergen challenge after 1-week treatment with placebo and a single dose of placebo immediately before allergen challenge (T1), or 1-week treatment with placebo and a single dose of salmeterol/fluticasone immediately before allergen challenge (T2), or 1-week treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone combination bid and a single dose of salmeterol/fluticasone immediately before allergen challenge (T3). EAR was evaluated both as maximum decrease in FEV1 (MaxDeltaFEV1 %) after allergen challenge and as area under FEV1 -time curve. MaxDeltaFEV1 % during allergen challenge protected by placebo (T1) was significantly greater than MaxDeltaFEV1 % during allergen challenges protected by single dose of salmeterol/fluticasone (T2) and by salmeterol/fluticasone 1-week treatment (T3). No difference was found in MaxDeltaFEV1 % between T2 and T3. The same results were observed also after computing the area under the curve for each challenge. When individually considered, all subjects were protected against EAR (protection index > or = 80%) at T2, while at 3 seven out of nine subjects were still protected against EAR. In conclusion, the simultaneous administration of salmeterol and fluticasone in the same device prevents in almost 80% of examined subjects the development of tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge. This observation may contribute to explain the positive interaction between inhaled beta2-agonists and corticosteroids in the long-term treatment of asthma.

Clinical practice guidelines: medical follow-up of patients with asthma--adults and adolescents

The follow-up of patients with asthma should focus on asthma control (disease course over a number of weeks).

Long-acting beta2-agonists: comparative pharmacology and clinical outcomes

Salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists). They both provide excellent bronchodilating and bronchoprotective effects in patients with asthma but their are some differences between these two long-acting beta(2)-agonists in vitro and in vivo. Formoterol has a greater potency and intrinsic activity than salmeterol, which can become especially apparent at higher doses than that clinically recommended, and in contracted bronchi. Long-term use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists can induce tolerance, which can be partially reversed with corticosteroids. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have some anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, but data in vivo are less convincing. Compared with doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids improves symptom control in patients with asthma and reduces both the exacerbation rate of asthma and hospital admission rate. No enhanced airway responsiveness or loss of perception of dyspnea has been observed with the use of inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists. Monotherapy with long-acting beta(2)-agonists is not recommended.

Beta2-adrenoceptor regulation of the K+ channel iKCa1 in human mast cells

Human mast cells express the intermediate conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel iKCa1, which opens following IgE-dependent activation. This results in cell membrane hyperpolarization and potentiation of both Ca2+ influx and degranulation. Mast cell activation is attenuated following exposure to beta2-adrenoceptor agonists such as salbutamol, an effect postulated to operate via intracellular cyclic AMP. In this study, we show that salbutamol closes iKCa1 in mast cells derived from human lung and peripheral blood. Salbutamol (1-10 microM) inhibited iKCa1 currents following activation with both anti-IgE and the iKCa1 opener 1-EBIO, and was reversed by removing salbutamol or by the addition of the selective beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist and inverse agonist ICI 118551. Interestingly, ICI 118551 consistently opened iKCa1 in quiescent cells, suggesting that constitutive beta2-receptor signaling suppresses channel activity. Manipulation of intracellular cAMP, Galphai, and Galphas demonstrates that the beta2-adrenergic effects are consistent with a membrane-delimited mechanism involving Galphas. This is the first demonstration that gating of the iKCa1 channel is regulated by a G protein-coupled receptor and provides a clearly defined mechanism for the mast cell "stabilizing" effect of beta2-agonists. Furthermore, the degree of constitutive beta2-receptor "tone" may control the threshold for human mast cell activation through the regulation of iKCa1.

Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future

The safety and efficacy of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) taken intermittently for the prevention of exercise-induced asthma (EIA) in children is well established. However, the safety and efficacy of LABAs taken twice daily, either alone or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids, for the prevention of EIA is not as clear because of issues of tolerance (defined as being less responsive to the influence of LABAs). There have been many observations on short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (SABAs) and EIA that should have alerted us to the potential for tolerance and desensitization to occur with LABAs. For example, we expected that the use of LABAs for EIA would overcome the problem of the short duration of protection of SABAs, and to some extent they have. The protective period of a LABA is two to three times longer in duration than that of a SABA. However, when a LABA is taken daily it is apparent that the duration of its protective effect is reduced and there is a risk of EIA occurring well within the 12-hour administration schedules. Furthermore, daily use of LABAs attenuates the bronchodilator effect of SABAs, an effect that is greater the more severe the bronchoconstriction. This 'tolerance' increases both the time and the amount of therapy that is needed to recover from bronchoconstriction, and thus, could potentially impact on the success of rescue therapy should severe EIA occur. The daily use of LABAs also increases the sensitivity of the bronchial smooth muscle to contractile agents. This increase in sensitivity is almost equivalent to the extent to which inhaled corticosteroids reduce sensitivity to the same contractile agents. The increased sensitivity to contractile agents may occur either by a reduction in the inhibitory effect of beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists on release of mediators from mast cells or by a direct effect on the bronchial smooth muscle. These unwanted effects of LABAs are not necessarily reduced by concomitant treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. As the number of children being treated with LABAs increases, it is predicted that problems with breakthrough EIA will also increase. We need to know the percentage of children taking a LABA daily who are requiring either extra doses of a beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to prevent (or reverse) EIA or other provocative stimuli. If this percentage is significant then we may need to reconsider the position of LABAs in the treatment of children with asthma who regularly perform strenuous physical activity.

LPS-induced bronchoalveolar neutrophilia; effects of salmeterol treatment

Salmeterol has earlier been reported to have immune modulating effects on Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neutrophilic inflammation in rodents. The aim of this study was to explore whether 3 weeks regular treatment with inhaled Salmeterol would have a protective effect against neutrophilia, following an LPS inhalation as assessed by bronchoscopy with bronchial wash (BW) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in healthy subjects. Fifteen volunteers all underwent bronchoscopies with bronchial wash and BAL on three occasions, each being 3 h after inhalation provocation. The initial inhalation was with saline (dilutant) as a reference and the two following with LPS 50 microg diluted in saline. After the saline inhalation the subjects were randomised to treatment with Salmeterol 50 microg twice daily and placebo in a double-blind double-dummy crossover design. Compared to saline inhalation, the LPS inhalations resulted in a two-fold increase in neutrophils both in BW and BAL, respectively (P < or = 0.01). The neutrophilia was present irrespective of the LPS inhalation was preceded by placebo or Salmeterol. This experimental study could not confirm any modulating effect of Salmeterol on LPS-induced airway neutrophilia.

One week treatment with salmeterol does not prevent early and late asthmatic responses and sputum eosinophilia induced by allergen challenge in asthmatics

Salmeterol is an effective long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator, able to inhibit, as a single dose, asthmatic responses induced by several stimuli including allergen, and the subsequent increase in sputum eosinophilia. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects of salmeterol persisted after 1 week of continuous treatment, or whether a loss of the bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol can occur over time. We investigated in a cross-over double blind placebo-controlled study, the protective effect of 1 week treatment with salmeterol on allergen-induced early and late responses and the associated airway inflammation in 15 atopic asthmatic subjects. Eosinophil percentage and Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) concentration in peripheral blood and in hypertonic saline induced sputum were measured at baseline and 24 h after allergen inhalation. Salmeterol partially inhibited early asthmatic response, but it did not inhibit late asthmatic response in comparison with placebo. Salmeterol did not inhibit also the increase in sputum eosinophils percentage 24 h after allergen inhalation (E%, median: 22.7 and 15%, after placebo and after salmeterol respectively, p=n.s. between two post-allergen sputum samples). Also, the increase in blood eosinophils and both sputum and serum ECP at 24 h after allergen challenge was not affected by salmeterol pre-treatment. In conclusion, 1 week treatment with salmeterol causes a loss of its protective effect on allergen-induced airway bronchoconstriction, and does not prevent the subsequent increase in sputum and serum eosinophilic markers.

Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol in mild untreated asthmatics

The aim of this study was to assess the distribution of the occurrence of tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge in a large sample of asthmatic subjects. We investigated 53 subjects (45 male and eight female), mean age 24+/-8.2 years, with mild intermittent asthma, in stable phase of the disease, never previously treated with regular beta2-agonists. All subjects with a previous positive early airway response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge underwent, in double blind randomized, cross-over manner, three further allergen challenges: after placebo (T0), after a single dose (50 microg) of inhaled salmeterol (T1), and after regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 microg bid) for 1 week (T2). All subjects showed an EAR after placebo treatment (T0), and were completely protected against EAR by the single dose of salmeterol (T1). After 1-week regular treatment with salmeterol (T2). 24 out of 53 subjects (45%) were still protected, whereas 29 subjects (55%) showed a significant EAR. The distribution of the response to allergen challenge, which was quite homogeneous at T0 and T1, showed considerable heterogeneity at T2. Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge can be observed in a large group of previously untreated mild asthmatic subjects. This phenomenon is heterogeneously distributed, with some subjects still showing a complete protection similar to that obtained after a single dose of salmeterol and others showing a response similar to that obtained after placebo. The reason of this heterogeneity needs to be elucidated.

Benefit-risk assessment of long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma

The use of a regular long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists; LABA) is now established in asthma guidelines as the preferred option for second-line controller therapy in addition to inhaled corticosteroids. This has been driven by data showing beneficial effects of LABAs on exacerbation rates, in turn suggesting a putative corticosteroid-sparing effect. As LABAs are devoid of any clinically meaningful anti-inflammatory activity in vivo, their effects on exacerbations are presumably due to a diurnal stabilising effect on airway smooth muscle. LABAs have marked effects on symptoms and lung function, and this may make it difficult to assess anti-inflammatory control with inhaled corticosteroids when used in a combination inhaler such as fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol. The use of fixed-dose combination inhalers is in many respects counter-intuitive to conventional teaching regarding flexible dosage titration with inhaled corticosteroids. It would therefore seem prudent first to gain optimal control of inflammation with inhaled corticosteroids before considering adding a LABA. Increasing the dosage of inhaled corticosteroids will have a relatively greater effect on exacerbations than on symptoms and lung function, whereas the converse applies when adding a LABA. Another option is to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist, which confers additional anti-inflammatory activity and is as effective on exacerbations as adding a LABA. Despite in vitro and ex vivo data showing a ligand-independent effect of LABAs on glucocorticoid receptor activation, clinical data do not indicate any relevant synergy between LABAs and inhaled corticosteroids when used together in the same inhaler. In particular, there is no evidence of potentiation by LABAs of the in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of inhaled corticosteroids that would suggest any genuine corticosteroid-sparing activity. Nonetheless, the data support the additive effects of inhaled corticosteroids and LABAs when used together due to their separate effects on inflammation and smooth muscle, respectively. Tolerance with LABAs is a predictable pharmacological phenomenon that occurs despite concomitant therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. Moreover, cross-tolerance also develops to short-acting beta2-agonists used for protection against bronchoconstrictor stimuli as a result of LABA-induced down-regulation, desensitisation and prolonged occupancy of beta2-adrenoceptors. The exact role of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphism in determining tolerance with LABAs requires further prospective clinical studies evaluating long-term effects on outcomes such as exacerbations in patients with relevant genotypes and haplotypes. The next decade will provide challenging issues for clinicians with respect to defining further the role of LABAs as add-on controller therapy, particularly in evaluating the long-term effects of combination inhalers on inflammatory outcomes and airway remodelling.

A comparison of salmeterol and formoterol in attenuating airway responses to short-acting beta2-agonists

In vitro data suggest that salmeterol, contrary to formoterol, can partly antagonise the effect of short-acting beta(2)-agonist rescue medication. To explore whether this occurs in vivo, we compared the effects of increasing doses (200-3200 microg) of fenoterol on the recovery of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction as well as PD(20) methacholine in 23 asthmatic patients, during two-week treatment periods with placebo, and standard doses of salmeterol or formoterol in a double blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Salmeterol showed a slightly higher propensity for the development of bronchodilator tolerance. The recovery of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction was more complete during regular use of formoterol relative to salmeterol. During regular use of both long-acting beta(2)-agonists the bronchoprotective efficacy of fenoterol was attenuated, but this was more pronounced during salmeterol than during formoterol. The mean maximum increase in PD(20) metacholine after the highest dose of fenoterol was 3.97 DD during placebo, 2.47 DD during formoterol (p<0.001) and 1.81 DD during salmeterol treatment (p<0.001). We conclude that in asthmatic patients the efficacy of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists can be significantly attenuated during regular use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists. In this respect, differences were observed between salmeterol and formoterol that may represent the expression of partial antagonism by salmeterol.

The role of the mast cell in asthma: a reassessment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interest in the role of the mast cell in bronchial asthma has waxed and waned over several decades, but there is now compelling evidence that mast cells make an important contribution to the pathophysiology of this disease. This review will discuss current advances in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mast cells, but not T cells or eosinophils, localize within the bronchial smooth muscle bundles in patients with asthma but not in normal individuals or those with eosinophilic bronchitis. Smooth muscle mast cell density correlates significantly with indices of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and is likely to be an important factor determining the asthmatic phenotype. Tryptase induces proliferation in human airway smooth muscle, and the recently identified transmembrane form induces the development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mice. IL-4 and IL-13, known mast cell products, also induce bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the mouse, in the absence of an inflammatory response. There are therefore several pathways by which the close approximation of mast cells with airway smooth muscle cells might lead to disordered smooth muscle function. Mast cells also infiltrate the airway mucous glands in patients with asthma, showing features of degranulation, and a positive correlate with the amount of mucus obstructing the airway lumen. Taken together these observations suggest that mast cells also play an important role in regulating mucous gland secretion.

SUMMARY

The development of potent and specific inhibitors of mast cell secretion, which remain active when administered long term to asthmatic airways, should offer a novel approach to the treatment of asthma.

Effect of salmeterol on seasonal changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide in pollen-sensitive asthmatic subjects

OBJECTIVE

Using a model of natural allergen exposure, we examined the effect of regular treatment with salmeterol on allergen-induced changes in airway responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide (ENO).

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.

SETTING

Specialist allergy unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Asthmatic patients sensitized to pollen allergens were randomly allocated to monotherapy with salmeterol (n = 14) or placebo (n = 13).

INTERVENTIONS

Salmeterol, 25 micro g, and placebo inhalers, two puffs bid, for 6 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Spirometry, the level of a provocative concentration of a substance (methacholine) causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)), the PC(20) level for adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), and ENO were measured before the pollen season and were repeated at the height of the pollen season after 6 weeks of treatment with salmeterol or placebo.

RESULTS

The decrease in FEV(1) during the pollen season was significantly larger in the placebo group than in the salmeterol group, the mean difference in the change between the groups being 0.20 L (95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.35; p = 0.047). Changes in PC(20) for methacholine, PC(20) for AMP, and ENO levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. However, a mean (+/- SEM) decrease in the PC(20) for methacholine of -1.0 +/- 0.4 doubling concentrations was observed within the placebo group (p = 0.03), whereas no significant changes were observed within the salmeterol group. A significant decrease in PC(20) for AMP (doubling concentrations) was observed within the placebo group (-2.1 +/- 0.6; p = 0.003) and the salmeterol group (-1.5 +/- 0.4; p = 0.003). ENO concentrations increased significantly among the placebo and the salmeterol groups during natural pollen exposure.

CONCLUSION

These observations indicate that natural allergen exposure and the regular use of salmeterol are not associated with a greater increase in ENO and airway responsiveness than allergen exposure alone.

Beta-agonists

Beta-Agonists are a mainstay of asthma treatment. Short-acting beta-agonists are the most effective bronchodilators for rescue or quick relief of symptoms. Long-acting beta-agonists have a key role in long-term control when added to inhaled corticosteroid therapy, and are especially useful in the control of nocturnal asthma. Both types of beta-agonists may be used in the prophylaxis of exercise-induced asthma with long-acting beta-agonists providing more prolonged protection. beta-Agonists have minimal side effects and are safe when used appropriately.

Antagonism of long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonism

The established place of regular long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists at step 3 in asthma management guidelines has evolved as a consequence of evidence showing additive effects of salmeterol and formoterol on exacerbation rates, resulting in a putative inhaled corticosteroid sparing effect. There is however, evidence to show that although long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists facilitate using a lower dose of inhaled corticosteroid, this may occur at the expense of suboptimal anti-inflammatory control. This is likely to be the case especially with fixed dose combination inhalers where it is not possible to properly titrate anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids without also inadvertently overtreating with unnecessarily high doses of long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists. Most patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma can be adequately controlled on monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroid in low or medium dosage, which is considerably cheaper than concomitant use of a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist. Subsensitivity to long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists is a predictable pharmacological phenomenon which occurs despite concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy and occurs more readily for bronchoprotective than bronchodilator effects. Subsensitivity of salbutamol protection against bronchoconstrictor stimuli occurs in patients receiving concomitant long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, which may be due to beta2-adrenoceptor down-regulation or prolonged receptor occupancy. Prospective large scale long-term studies are required to further define the clinical relevance of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms, to look at clinical control outcomes as well as propensity for subsensitivity. It would therefore make more sense to first of all optimize the dose of anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroid and to then consider adding a long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist for patients who are poorly controlled.

The evolution of beta2-agonists

Beta-agonists have been widely used in the treatment of asthma for many years Although concerns have been expressed over their safety based largely upon epidemics of increased mortality in asthmatics associated with high doses of isoprenaline in the 1960s and fenoterol in the 1970s and 1980s, the specific beta2-agonists are vital drugs in asthma management. The short-acting beta2-agonists have an important prophylactic role in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, and are essential in the emergency treatment of severe asthma. However, little if any benefit seems to be derived from regular use of short-acting beta2-agonists and regular or frequent use can increase the severity of the condition. The development of beta2-agonists with long-acting properties, such as salmeterol and formoterol, has provided advantages over short-acting beta-agonists, such as prolonged bronchodilation, reduced day- and night-time symptoms and improved quality of sleep, and has reduced the requirement for short-acting beta2-agonists as relief medication. Both drugs are well tolerated and, when added to inhaled corticosteroids, produce greater mprovement in lung function than increased steroid dose alone. Because of its rapid onset of action, formoterol also has the potential to be used for as-needed bronchodilator therapy in asthma.

Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge can be partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol regular treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the withdrawal of salmeterol treatment for 3 days (72 h) can restore its bronchoprotective ability on specific bronchial provocative test (sBPT) with allergen, which was completely lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-blind design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated 10 nonsmoking subjects (8 men and 2 women; mean +/- SD age, 24 +/- 8 years) with mild intermittent allergic asthma in the stable phase of the disease, who were never previously treated with regular beta(2)-agonists. Subjects with a previous positive early airway response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge were considered. They underwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg (T(1)), and then underwent sBPT after 1 week of regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol, 50 microg bid (T(2)); after that, they continued inhaled salmeterol treatment for 4 days, and then changed to inhaled salmeterol with placebo (two puffs bid) for 3 days (72 h) and underwent sBPT with allergen after a single dose of salmeterol, 50 microg (T(3)).

RESULTS

EAR to allergen (DeltaFEV(1) > or = 20% with respect to postdiluent value) was completely abolished by a single dose of salmeterol (T(1); protection index [PI] > or = 50% in all subjects), but it was still present after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol (T(2); PI < 50% in all subjects). The maximum FEV(1) percentage fall during sBPT with allergen was significantly lower after withdrawal of regular inhaled salmeterol (T(3)) than after regular treatment with salmeterol (T(2)) (mean, 23% vs 29.5%; range, 4 to 41% vs 18 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05); a similar result was obtained considering the PI of salmeterol on sBPT with allergen (mean, 44% vs 20%; range, 2 to 86% vs - 11 to 49%, respectively; p < 0.05). However, the maximum FEV(1) percentage fall and PI were significantly different in T(3) than after T(1), and only 4 of 10 patients showed in T(3) a PI > or = 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced EAR, completely lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol, may be partially restored by the withdrawal of salmeterol therapy for 3 days (72 h). However, this withdrawal time period is not sufficient to recover the baseline bronchoprotective efficacy of the first dose of salmeterol.

Regular inhaled salbutamol : effect on airway responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate and tolerance to bronchoprotection

OBJECTIVE

Regular treatment with inhaled beta(2)-agonists increases airway responsiveness consistently to indirect bronchoconstrictors (allergen, exercise, hypertonic saline solution, etc) and inconsistently to direct bronchoconstrictors (histamine, methacholine). Studies demonstrating tolerance to beta(2)-agonist bronchoprotection against the indirect bronchoconstrictor adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) have not examined changes in baseline AMP responsiveness. This study assessed the effect of regular salbutamol on AMP and methacholine responsiveness and on tolerance to bronchoprotection.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

University hospital bronchoprovocation laboratory.

PATIENTS

Fourteen atopic asthmatic subjects with FEV(1) > 65% predicted, and methacholine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) < 8 mg/mL.

INTERVENTIONS

Salbutamol, 100 microg, and placebo inhalers, two puffs qid, each for 10 days.

MEASUREMENTS

Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) measured 12 h after blinded inhaler after each treatment period. Methacholine PC(20) and AMP PC(20) repeated 10 min after salbutamol, 200 microg (eight subjects).

RESULTS

There was no difference between placebo and salbutamol treatment in geometric mean methacholine PC(20) (0.85 mg/mL vs 0.82 mg/mL, p = 0.86) or AMP PC(20) (22 mg/mL vs 17.4 mg/mL, p = 0.21; n = 14). The acute bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol was greater vs. AMP than vs methacholine (5.1 doubling concentrations vs. 3.5 doubling concentrations, p = 0.06) and loss of protective effect of salbutamol (mean +/- SD) was greater vs AMP than vs. methacholine (2.4 +/- 0.33 doubling concentration loss vs 0.8 +/- 0.21 doubling concentration loss, p = 0.008; n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Regular salbutamol (mean +/- SD) treatment did not enhance airway responsiveness to either the indirect bronchoconstrictor AMP or the direct bronchoconstrictor methacholine. Compared to its effect on methacholine, salbutamol had a greater acute protective effect vs AMP and produced greater loss of protection vs AMP when used regularly.

The influence of polymorphism at position 16 of the beta2-adrenoceptor on the development of tolerance to beta-agonist

Polymorphism at position 16 of the beta2-adrenoceptor alters receptor down-regulation in vitro. Our aim was to compare the development of tolerance to beta-agonist in homozygous Gly-16 patients with patients harboring the "wild" genotype (homozygous Arg-16) during regular treatment with salmeterol. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 20 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (10 Gly-16, 10 Arg-16) received 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol 100 microg b.i.d. Thereafter, dose responses to inhaled salbutamol were constructed for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), heart rate, QTc interval, serum potassium and glucose, and finger tremor. The protective effect of salbutamol against adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge was also measured. Salmeterol resulted in a significant reduction in the area under curve (AUC) for FEV1 (p = 0.01), heart rate (p = 0.01), QTc interval (p = 0.01), and tremor (p = 0.05), and in the maximum responses for FEV1 (p = 0.05), heart rate (p = 0.02), and glucose (p = 0.02). The protective effect of salbutamol against AMP was reduced by 3.61 doubling doses (p < 0.001). However, differences between Gly-16 and Arg-16 patients were small and nonsignificant. Thus, although tolerance is influenced in vitro by polymorphism of the beta2-adrenoceptor, the magnitude of between-genotype differences in vivo is unlikely to be significant.

Mast cell tryptase release and asthmatic responses to allergen increase with regular use of salbutamol

BACKGROUND

Increased asthmatic responses to allergen, both early and late, have been demonstrated after regular use of beta(2)-agonists in as few as 7 days. Desensitization of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors on airway mast cells may contribute to this effect by allowing greater release of mast cell mediator on allergen-induced degranulation. Tryptase released from lung mast cells can be measured in serum 1 hour after allergen challenge and serves as a marker of mast cell degranulation.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of regular treatment with salbutamol, a beta(2)-agonist, on mast cell mediator release after allergen challenge and its influence on the early asthmatic response (EAR) and the late allergic response, we measured the EAR, serum tryptase levels, the 7-hour FEV(1), and sputum tryptase levels and cell profiles.

METHODS

We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized cross-over comparison of treatments for 10 days with either a salbutamol metered-dose inhaler (100 microgram, 2 puffs 4 times daily) or a matched placebo inhaler with at least a 7-day washout between treatments. Atopic subjects (n = 14) with mild-to-moderate asthma performed same-dose allergen inhalation tests after both treatments 12 to 15 hours after the last dose of study inhaler. Baseline and 7-hour FEV(1) and the EAR to allergen were measured by using spirometry; venous blood was drawn at 1 hour for analysis of serum tryptase; and sputum was induced and collected at 1 and 7 hours.

RESULTS

Salbutamol treatment resulted in a significantly greater EAR (20% +/- 1.6% [SEM] vs 15% +/- 2.1%; P =.047); increased 1-hour serum tryptase levels (9.09 +/- 1.57 vs 7.52 +/- 1.12 microgram/L; P =. 011); increased proportions of eosinophils in the 7-hour sputum sample (39.1% +/- 5.1% vs 28.4% +/- 4.4%; P <.05); increased proportion of metachromatic cells in the 7-hour sputum sample (4.4% +/- 1.1% vs 2.2% +/- 0.6%; P =.032); and lower 7-hour FEV(1) (2.77 +/- 0.18 vs 2.97 +/- 0.20 L; P =.014). Baseline FEV(1) was not significantly different after salbutamol treatment compared with values after placebo treatment (2.90 +/- 0.20 vs 3.00 +/- 0.19 L; P =.11).

CONCLUSION

Regular 10-day treatment with salbutamol increases the allergen-induced release of mediator from airway mast cells, and this is reflected in an increased EAR to allergen. Late-phase responses to allergen were also enhanced, as demonstrated by decreased 7-hour FEV(1) and increased eosinophilia and percentage of metachromatic cells in the 7-hour sputum sample. Increased allergen-induced mast cell degranulation could, in part, explain the increased asthmatic responses to allergen after beta(2)-agonist treatment and could contribute to the deterioration of asthma control that is associated with regular use of beta(2)-agonist by potentiating allergic inflammation.

Long-acting beta(2)-agonists in management of childhood asthma: A critical review of the literature

This review assesses the evidence regarding the use of long-acting beta(2)-agonists in the management of pediatric asthma. Thirty double-blind, randomized, controlled trials on the effects of formoterol and salmeterol on lung function in asthmatic children were identified. Single doses of inhaled salmeterol or formoterol cause prolonged bronchodilatation (>12 h) and extended bronchoprotection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children, some children achieving full protection for more than 12 h. Heterogeneity in bronchoprotection has been observed, and individual dose-titration may be attempted. The onset of action of formoterol is comparable to salbutamol, while salmeterol has a slower onset of action. Partial tolerance develops when long-acting beta(2)-agonists are used as regular treatment, including cross-tolerance to short-acting beta(2)-agonists. Regular treatment with salmeterol in children with or without corticosteroids provides statistically significant bronchodilatation, but the degree of improvement in lung function or bronchoprotection against exercise and nonspecific irritants is small with regular use. There is no evidence of anti-inflammatory effects from inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonists, which is reflected by unchanged or increased bronchial hyperreactivity and no reduction of exacerbation rates. The evidence does not support a recommendation for long-acting beta(2)-agonists as monotherapy, nor does it support their general use as regular add-on therapy. In conclusion, long-acting beta(2)-agonists provide effective bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection when used as intermittent, single-dose treatment of asthma in children, but not when used as regular treatment. Future studies should examine the positioning of long-acting beta(2)-agonists as an "as needed" rescue medication instead of short-acting beta(2)-agonists for pediatric asthma management.

Montelukast: data from clinical trials in the management of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat asthma, and to discuss the therapeutic role of montelukast as long-term medication and difficulties associated with the management of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (up to May 1999) was conducted to identify relevant English-language publications, including preclinical studies, clinical trials, and recent reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

All available published reports of controlled, clinical trials of montelukast in adults and children with asthma were summarized, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic effects of montelukast.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information on the safety and efficacy of montelukast was evaluated on the basis of patient selection, study design, methodology, and statistical significance as compared with placebo or inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Montelukast is approved for the prophylaxis and chronic treatment of asthma at a dose of 10 mg once daily for adolescents (> or =15 y) and adults and 5 mg once daily for children (6-14 y). In placebo-controlled clinical trials, montelukast significantly improved pulmonary lung function (as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 sec), significantly reduced beta2-agonist use, and significantly improved patient-reported end points in adults and children (> or =6 y) with chronic asthma. In adults, a similar magnitude of improvement in lung function is seen with or without inhaled corticosteroid use; the effects of montelukast may be additive to those of inhaled corticosteroids and permit the reduction of the required dose of inhaled corticosteroids. In cases of exercise-induced asthma (adults and children), montelukast treatment attenuates the fall in pulmonary function following exercise. It attenuates both the early- and late-phase responses of asthma after allergen inhalation. Improvements in asthma control are similar in asthmatic patients who are aspirin-sensitive or not aspirin-sensitive and can be seen within one day of treatment. Tolerance does not develop, and the adverse events do not differ from those of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast is indicated for the prophylaxis of chronic asthma in adults and children (> or =6 y). It may be considered for use as first-line therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma or for additional control in patients who are still symptomatic while receiving treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. It may also be used for additional control in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients. Consideration may be given for using montelukast to allow tapering of the dose of inhaled corticosteroids while maintaining clinical stability. Chronic treatment with montelukast can provide additional control of symptoms during exercise, but inhaled beta2-agonists remain first-line therapy for prophylaxis and treatment.

Therapeutic equivalence of Spiros dry powder inhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler. A bioassay using methacholine

Because chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) contribute to depletion of stratospheric ozone, CFC-containing metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) such as Ventolin and Proventil are being phased out of production. In terms of delivery of albuterol to the lungs, we compared an alternative delivery system, the Spiros dry-powder inhaler (DPI), with Ventolin, using a methacholine challenge-based clinical bioassay. Twenty-four adults and adolescents with asthma completed this double-blind, four-period crossover study. Doses evaluated were one and three actuations each of Spiros and Ventolin (90- and 270-microgram albuterol base). A methacholine challenge (Cockcroft method) was initiated 3 h before and 0.25 h after albuterol. Predose PC(20)FEV(1) values were not significantly different between study days. Postdose PC(20)FEV(1) results met standard bioassay study validity criteria: i.e., a significant dose-response relationship was present (p = 0.0002); tests for deviation from parallelism and overlap of dose-response curves were nonsignificant (p = 0.08, 0.69). By using Finney 2-by-2 bioassay analysis, we estimate that each Spiros actuation delivers 1.12 times as much albuterol to the airways as one Ventolin actuation (90% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.94). There were no significant differences in markers of systemic effects (vital signs, potassium, and blood glucose concentrations). We conclude that Spiros and Ventolin inhalers deliver comparable quantities of albuterol to the airways.

Effect of beta-agonists on production of cytokines by activated T cells obtained from asthmatic patients and normal subjects

Intracellular levels of cAMP were found to regulate T cell activity. We examined whether beta2-agonists altered cytokine production and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation in concanavalin A (ConA)-activated peripheral T cells from asthmatic patients. Procaterol and isoproterenol weakly decreased the ConA-elicited interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 secretion; however, the inhibitory effect of procaterol on the ConA-induced IL-2 secretion was inferior to that of isoproterenol in normal controls and was little in asthmatics. The intracellular accumulation of cAMP by procaterol was not altered compared with that by isoproterenol. Results suggest that there is a qualitative difference between procaterol- and isoproterenol-induced cAMP accumulation in T cells.

Effect of a single dose of salmeterol on the increase in airway eosinophils induced by allergen challenge in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

The long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol is very effective in preventing asthmatic responses to specific stimuli, and this effect could theoretically be due to some anti-inflammatory property in addition to bronchodilator property.

METHODS

The protective effect of a single dose of salmeterol (50 microg) on allergen induced early and late responses and on the associated airway inflammation was investigated in a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study in 11 atopic asthmatic subjects. Eosinophil percentages and concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in peripheral blood and in hypertonic saline induced sputum were measured 24 hours after allergen inhalation.

RESULTS

Salmeterol effectively inhibited both early and late asthmatic responses in comparison with placebo. Salmeterol also inhibited the increase in the percentage of eosinophils in the sputum 24 hours after allergen inhalation (median (range) baseline 6% (1-36), after placebo 31% (5-75), after salmeterol 12% (1-63)). However, the increase in both sputum and serum ECP concentrations 24 hours after allergen challenge was not affected by pretreatment with salmeterol.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of salmeterol inhibits the allergen induced airway responses and the increase in sputum eosinophils after allergen challenge.

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo

BACKGROUND

Regular use of racemic salbutamol results in the partial loss of its bronchoprotective effect. The 2 enantiomers of salbutamol, the bronchodilator R-salbutamol and nonbronchodilator S-salbutamol, are now available.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the effect of regular use of S-salbutamol, R-salbutamol, racemic salbutamol, and placebo on the bronchoprotective effect of a single dose of racemic salbutamol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Eleven of 13 well-controlled beta2 -agonist-free asthmatic subjects completed a double-blind, randomized study comparing racemic salbutamol 2.5 mg, S-salbutamol 1. 25 mg, R-salbutamol 1.25 mg, and diluent placebo nebulized and inhaled 3 times daily for 6 days (>/=6-day washout period). Ten to 12 hours after the last dose, the subjects performed measurement of FEV1, methacholine PC20, and a repeat methacholine PC20 done 1 hour after the first methacholine test and 10 minutes after 2 puffs (200 microgram) of racemic salbutamol administered from a metered-dose inhaler. The primary endpoint was the methacholine PC20 dose shift (Deltalog PC20/log 2) from before to after administration of 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol.

RESULTS

The methacholine dose shift was 3.2 doubling doses (9-fold increase in methacholine PC20 after 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol) during the placebo treatment and was unaltered (3.2) after administration of S-salbutamol. The dose shift was significantly lower after both the R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol treatments (2.2 and 2.6 doubling doses, respectively); there was no significant difference between R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol. There was no treatment effect on baseline FEV1, baseline methacholine PC20, or bronchodilation.

CONCLUSION

Regular treatment with racemic salbutamol or R-salbutamol, but not S-salbutamol, results in a partial loss of bronchoprotection, without loss of bronchodilation, compared with placebo.

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate reverts tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge

STUDY OBJECTIVE

One week of regular treatment with salmeterol can induce tolerance to the protective effect of a beta2-agonist on early airway response to allergen (EAR). The objective was to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids revert tolerance to salmeterol.

STUDY DESIGN

The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve subjects with mild allergic asthma and positive result of specific bronchial provocation test (sBPT) to allergen underwent three sBPTs, separated by 1 week. sBPT was done in all subjects after a single dose (T1) and after 1 week of regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 microg bid) (T2) in order to induce tolerance. Subjects were then randomized to receive either the same dose of salmeterol + beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 500 microg bid) (group 1, n = 6) or placebo + BDP (group 2, n = 6) for 1 week before sBPT (T3).

RESULTS

After a single dose of salmeterol (T1), all subjects were protected against EAR, whereas after 1 week of regular treatment, the protective effect of salmeterol was totally or partially lost (T2). Maximum FEV1 percent fall (MaxdeltaFEV1%) after allergen inhalation was significantly higher at T2 than at T1. All subjects except one of group 1 were protected against EAR after salmeterol + BDP (T3), and MaxdeltaFEV1% at T3 (median, 12%; range, 4 to 6%) was significantly lower than T2 (median, 22%; range, 12 to 43%; p < 0.05 by Wilcoxon test). Subjects of group 2 did not show any significant protection against EAR after placebo + BDP treatment (T3) MaxdeltaFEV1% at T2 (median, 31%; range, 9 to 40%) and T3 (median, 31%; range, 3 to 42%; not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the addition of inhaled BDP partially restored the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge that was lost after 1 week of regular treatment with salmeterol alone. This ability of BDP in reverting tolerance cannot be ascribed to a direct effect of corticosteroids per se on allergen challenge in this group of asthmatics.

The effects of regular inhaled formoterol, budesonide, and placebo on mucosal inflammation and clinical indices in mild asthma

The present study was designed to observe the effects of 8 wk of treatment with formoterol (Foradil) 24 microgram, budesonide 400 microgram, and matched placebo inhaled twice a day on inflammatory indices in the bronchial mucosa of 64 patients with mild atopic asthma. Biopsies were obtained at the start and 1 wk before stopping a 9-wk period of treatment, and inflammatory cell numbers were assessed in the submucosa and epithelium by immunohistochemistry. Regular formoterol significantly reduced the number of submucosal mast cells, with a similar trend for eosinophils but not activated T cells. A subgroup analysis conducted in biopsies with >= 10 eosinophils per mm2 revealed a significant reduction in eosinophil numbers when compared with both pretreatment baseline (p < 0.01) and changes after placebo (p < 0.01). Parallel, but less pronounced, effects were observed on mast cell but not on CD25(+) T cell numbers. There was no effect of any of the three treatments on BAL levels of mast cell or eosinophil mediators. We conclude that regular treatment with inhaled formoterol reduces rather than increases inflammatory cells in the mucosa of asthmatic patients. It is possible that these cellular effects of formoterol may contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of this drug when used regularly in the treatment

Long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists in asthma therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology of the long-acting inhaled beta2-agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, summarize results of their clinical trials, evaluate their safety records, and discuss their roles in the treatment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Preclinical and clinical studies involving salmeterol or formoterol were identified by a MEDLINE search, weekly computerized literature updates, and manual searches. Studies of satisfactory quality were chosen for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Salmeterol and formoterol are potent and selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonists with durations of action >12 h. Their major differences are that formoterol has a rapid onset of action and is a partial agonist of high intrinsic efficacy, whereas salmeterol has a delayed onset and is a partial agonist of low intrinsic efficacy. Twice daily use of either drug results in improved lung function, reduced symptoms, and a better quality of life. These agents protect against exercise-induced asthma for 12 h and eliminate nighttime awakening in most patients. Limited tolerance develops, especially to their bronchoprotective effects, but their improvement of lung function is sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of salmeterol or formoterol provides subjective and objective amelioration of asthma in patients experiencing excessive symptoms or physiologic impairment despite the regular administration of low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (equivalent to approximately 500 microg/d of beclomethasone). Intermittent use of either long-acting beta2-agonist can provide prolonged protection against exercise-induced asthma or nighttime symptoms. Patients should be instructed to continue taking inhaled steroids when long-acting beta2-agonists are administered on a regular schedule and to not take long-acting beta2-agonists between regularly scheduled doses. Used properly, they are effective and safe adjunctive agents in the treatment of asthma.

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol 12 hours after starting twice daily treatment

BACKGROUND

Regular use of salmeterol has been associated with reduced bronchoprotective effect against methacholine as early as 24 hours after initiating treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether loss of the bronchoprotective effect measured one hour after salmeterol could be demonstrated 12 hours following one previous dose.

METHODS

Ten subjects with stable, mild asthma were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study comparing two 2-dose treatment periods: (1) blinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled at bedtime, followed by unblinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled 12 hours later and (2) blinded placebo inhaled at bedtime, followed by unblinded salmeterol 50 microg inhaled 12 hours later. The methacholine PC20 was measured one hour after the morning salmeterol; FEV1 was measured just prior to the morning salmeterol dose and at the start of the methacholine inhalation test.

RESULTS

The mean log methacholine PC20 recorded one hour after a single dose of salmeterol (1.20 +/- 0.17 SE) was significantly higher than the mean log methacholine PC20 recorded after two doses of salmeterol at 12-hour intervals (1.00 +/- 0.16 SE; P = .024). The mean FEV1 12 hours after salmeterol was significantly higher than the mean FEV1 recorded 12 hours after placebo (P = .0017), however, there was no significant difference between the FEV1 recordings one hour after the two unblinded doses of salmeterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction occurs extremely quickly as it is evident 12 hours after starting twice daily treatment.

Airway subsensitivity with long-acting beta 2-agonists. Is there cause for concern?

Regular treatment with both long- and short-acting beta 2-agonists results in tolerance to their bronchoprotective effects, although the relevance of this phenomenon in terms of long term asthma control remains unclear. However, there appears to be no appreciable difference between the 2 long-active beta 2-agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, in their propensity to induce beta 2-adrenoceptor down-regulation and subsensitivity. The degree of subsensitivity appears to be somewhat greater with indirect stimuli such as exercise and allergen challenge, compared with direct stimuli such as histamine and methacholine. This loss of functional antagonism with long-acting beta 2-agonist therapy is partial and is not prevented by concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy. However, the protective effects of inhaled corticosteroids on their own appear to be additive to those of long-acting beta 2-agonists when both drugs are concomitantly administered in the long term. The subsensitivity to bronchoprotection may be of clinical relevance in terms of patients who are inadvertently exposed to indirect bronchoconstrictor stimuli such as allergens or exercise, suggesting that long-acting beta 2-agonists should not be taken on a regular basis for this particular indication. There is a greater tendency for bronchodilator subsensitivity to develop with longer-acting, than with shorter-acting beta 2-agonists, and this may reflect the longer duration of beta 2-adrenoceptor occupancy and consequent downregulation. As with the bronchoprotective effects of long-acting beta 2-agonists, the development of bronchodilator subsensitivity is only partial and occurs regardless of whether patients are taking concomitant inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The long-term bronchodilator action of the long-acting beta 2-agonist itself is maintained within the twice daily administration interval. However, subsensitivity occurs in relation to a blunted response to repeated doses of short-acting beta 2-agonists, as in the setting of an acute asthma attack. There is considerable inter-individual variability in the propensity for downregulation and subsensitivity, which is determined by genetic polymorphism of the beta 2-adrenoceptor. Current international asthma management guidelines suggest that long-acting beta 2-agonists should be used on a regular basis in patients who ware inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroid therapy, so the addition of long-acting beta 2-agonist therapy is an alternative to using higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids. There are, however, concerns that regular long-acting beta 2-agonists might result in masking of inadequately treated inflammation in patients receiving suboptimal inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Physicians should be aware of the airway subsensitivity that develops with long-acting beta 2-agonist therapy, and patients should be warned that they may have to use higher than conventional dosages of short-acting beta 2-agonists to relieve acute bronchoconstriction in order to overcome this effect. In patients receiving an optimised maintenance dose of inhaled corticosteroid, if long-acting beta 2-agonists are to be used on an as required basis, it would seem rational to use formoterol for this purpose, due to its faster onset of action than salmeterol.