Nonprescription bronchodilator medication use in asthma

Over-the-Counter Bronchodilators Use Among Asthmatic Patients in Al-Medina Al-Monawwara

Asthma is a prevalent chronic disease that affects a significant number of individuals worldwide. Proper diagnosis and assessment of asthma patients are crucial before determining the appropriate inhaler for them. Many asthmatic patients self-medicate with over-the-counter (OTC) inhaled and orally taken bronchodilators, leading to overuse and serious adverse effects. This study aims to identify the extent of OTC bronchodilator usage in the Al-Medina Al-Monawwara region. and urge health authorities to address the issue and prevent potential side effects arising from the overuse of bronchodilators. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among individuals with asthma residing in the Al-Medina Al-Monawwara region of Saudi Arabia. The study encompassed multiple hospitals. It was carried out between September 2021 and February 2023, utilizing a convenience sampling method. A total of 419 participants were included in the study; the majority of them, 362 (86.4%), reported being prescribed asthma inhalers at least once in their lives, while 57 (13.6%) always used asthma inhalers without a prescription. However, most of our participants reported having a prescription for their short-acting bronchodilators, with 46.3% always obtaining them with a prescription and the remaining obtaining them over the counter. The current study indicates that the use of OTC Bronchodilators increases the risk of significant ER visits; this observation is quite concerning as the increasing use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) might indicate less asthma control and more SABA overuse; further research is needed to address the issue of short-acting bronchodilators overuse.

SABINA: An Overview of Short-Acting β2-Agonist Use in Asthma in European Countries

INTRODUCTION

Globally, individuals with asthma tend to overrely on short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) and underuse inhaled corticosteroids, thereby undertreating the underlying inflammation. Such relief-seeking behavior has been reinforced by long-standing treatment guidelines, which until recently recommended SABA-only use for immediate symptom relief. We aimed to describe the current burden of SABA use among European individuals with asthma within the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) program.

METHODS

Prescription and/or dispensing data during 2006-2017 from electronic medical records and/or national patient registries in the United Kingdom (UK), Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden were analyzed. Individuals aged at least 12 years old with a current asthma diagnosis and no other chronic respiratory conditions were included. Asthma treatment step and severity were based on treatment guidelines in use in each individual country. The proportion of individuals prescribed SABA was measured during a 12-month period. SABA overuse was defined as at least three SABA canisters per year.

RESULTS

More than one million individuals with asthma were included across five European countries. Overall, the majority of individuals were over 45 years of age, except in Sweden (mean age 27.6 years) where individuals aged over 45 years were excluded to avoid a potential chronic obstructive pulmonary disease co-diagnosis. The study population was predominantly female (55-64%), except in the UK (46%). The prevalence of SABA overuse was 9% in Italy, 16% in Germany, 29% in Spain, 30% in Sweden, and 38% in the UK. In the UK, SABA overuse was greater in individuals with moderate-to-severe asthma versus individuals with mild asthma (58% versus 27%, respectively), while SABA overuse was similar in individuals with both mild (9-32%) and moderate-to-severe (8-31%) asthma in the other European countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study from the SABINA program show that SABA overuse (at least three canisters per year) is common across Europe, despite the different healthcare and reimbursement policies of each country.

Understanding reliever overuse in patients purchasing over-the-counter short-acting beta2 agonists: an Australian community pharmacy-based survey

OBJECTIVES

Overuse of asthma relievers is associated with significant adverse consequences. This study aimed to better understand the population purchasing and using short-acting beta agonists (SABA) over the counter (OTC); and compare the demographic, clinical and behavioural characteristics of those who overuse SABA with those who do not.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Real-world cross-sectional observational study in community pharmacy.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 412 participants ≥16 years requesting SABA OTC, 289 were SABA overusers (used SABA more than twice per week in the past 4 weeks).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Reliever use, Global Initiative for Asthma-defined control, healthcare utilisation, patterns of preventer use.

RESULTS

70.1% of participants were classified as SABA overusers, that is, reporting SABA use more than twice a week within the last 4 weeks, 73.6% reported not using a preventer daily and only 81.6% reported a doctor diagnosis of asthma. SABA overusers were more likely to have moderate-severe nasal symptoms (80.8% vs 63.0%, p<0.001) and a diagnosis of depression (11.1% vs 5.7%, p<0.001), when compared with SABA non-overusers. A higher proportion of SABA overusers had uncontrolled asthma (59.0% vs 15.4%, p<0.001), were more likely to use oral corticosteroids to manage worsening asthma symptoms (26.2% vs 13.5%, p<0.01) and visit the doctor for their asthma in the past 12 months (74.5% vs 62.5%, p<0.01), when compared to SABA non-overusers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study uncovers a hidden population of people who can only be identified in pharmacy with suboptimal asthma, coexisting rhinitis, poor preventer adherence and, in some cases, no asthma diagnosis.

Asthma medications should be available for over-the-counter use: con

The United States Food and Drug Administration recently considered a policy to transfer inhaled short-acting bronchodilators to over-the-counter status if conditions of safe use can be established. The American Thoracic Society filed a comment in opposition to the proposal. This article examines the negative consequences that might result from allowing nonprescription access to bronchodilators and other inhaled asthma medications. Such a proposed policy change conflicts directly with current guidelines for asthma management and would undermine efforts to achieve adequate asthma control in patients. In addition, a policy change to convert asthma medications to over-the-counter status could result in increased costs to patients as well as increased health care costs to society overall due to a worsening of asthma control in the population.

Don't ask, don't tell: parental nondisclosure of complementary and alternative medicine and over-the-counter medication use in children's asthma management

INTRODUCTION

Parent-health care provider (HCP) communication is an important component of pediatric asthma management. Given the high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and over-the-counter (OTC) medication use among this population, it is important to examine parental nondisclosure of these asthma management strategies.

METHOD

One-time interview and 1-year retrospective medical record review with 228 parents of 5- to 12-year-old children with asthma enrolled from six pediatric primary care practices examining parental nondisclosure of CAM and OTC medication use, reasons for nondisclosure, medical record documentation of CAM usage, and association between parent-HCP relationship and nondisclosure.

RESULTS

Seventy-one percent of parents reported using CAM and/or OTC medication for children's asthma management, and 54% of those parents did not disclose usage. Seventy-five percent "did not think" to discuss it. Better parent-HCP relationship led to decreased nondisclosure.

DISCUSSION

HCPs can play an important role in creating an environment where parents feel comfortable sharing information about their children's asthma management strategies in order to arrive at a shared asthma management plan for the child, leading to improved asthma health outcomes.

Response to nonprescription epinephrine inhaler during nocturnal asthma

BACKGROUND

Many health care professionals believe that a nonprescription epinephrine metered-dose inhaler is less effective and shorter acting and has more cardiovascular adverse effects than prescription beta2-agonists.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if increasing the epinephrine dose improves efficacy safely.

METHODS

Eight patients with nocturnal asthma (age range, 20-46 years) were treated in a randomized, crossover manner on 2 different nights while sleeping in a clinical research center. On awakening from asthma symptoms, 2, 4, and 8 actuations of epinephrine or albuterol were administered at 17-minute intervals (14 cumulative actuations). Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), asthma symptoms, and systemic effects were measured before the first dose, during the 9- to 17-minute period after each dose, and 30 minutes after the last dose.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD FEV1 at the onset of symptoms was 45% +/- 11% and 44% +/- 12% predicted before epinephrine and albuterol, respectively, and increased to a maximum of 86% +/- 11% and 93% +/- 10%, respectively (P = .04). Symptoms decreased as FEV1 improved and did not return after either treatment; 6 patients were symptom free after 14 cumulative actuations of epinephrine compared with 6 cumulative actuations of albuterol. Heart rate decreased to 71 +/- 10/min after epinephrine but increased to 92 +/- 14/min after albuterol (P = .001). After the last dose, serum potassium concentration was 3.6 +/- 0.3 micromol/L after epinephrine and 3.2 +/- 0.4 micromol/L after albuterol (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Epinephrine was nearly as effective as albuterol in terminating an acute episode of airway obstruction but without cardiovascular effects in these otherwise healthy young adults.

Alternative therapies among adults with a reported diagnosis of asthma or rhinosinusitis : data from a population-based survey

BACKGROUND

Asthma and rhinosinusitis are common medical conditions among adults. Alternative treatments could have important impacts on health status among those individuals with these conditions, but specific prevalence data for these treatments are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of specific alternative treatment modalities, including herbal agents, ingestion of caffeinated beverages, homeopathy, acupuncture, and massage therapies.

DESIGN

Random population telephone sample.

SETTING

Northern California.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred adults aged 18 to 50 years with self-report of a physician diagnosis of asthma (n = 125) or rhinosinusitis without concomitant asthma (n = 175).

MEASUREMENTS

Structured telephone interviews covering demographics and clinical variables, including the following alternative treatments used in the previous 12 months: herbal agents; caffeine-containing products; homeopathy; acupuncture; aromatherapy; reflexology; and massage.

RESULTS

Any alternative practice was reported by 127 subjects (42%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 48%). Of these, 33 subjects (26%; 95% CI, 21 to 31%) were not current prescription medication users. Herbal use was reported by 72 subjects (24%), caffeine treatment by 54 subjects (18%), and other alternative treatments by 66 subjects (22%). Taking into account demographic variables, subjects with asthma were more likely than those with rhinitis alone to report caffeine self-treatment for their condition (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8%), but herbal use and other alternative treatments did not differ significantly by condition group.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatments are frequent among adults with asthma or rhinosinusitis and should be taken into account by health-care providers and public health and policy analysts.

Safety of over-the-counter inhalers for asthma: report of the council on scientific affairs

The occasional use of over-the-counter (OTC) epinephrine inhalers appears to be safe and effective when used according to labeled instruction by individuals with mild, intermittent asthma. However, gross misuse of these products can cause severe adverse reactions, including death. Limited survey data suggest that approximately 20% of individuals using OTC epinephrine inhalers have mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. According to recent consensus guidelines, these individuals should be under a physician's care and receiving corticosteroid therapy. If these products continue to be marketed, labeling should be strengthened to better educate users about appropriate and inappropriate use of OTC epinephrine inhalers intended for patients with mild, intermittent asthma.

Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in asthma: regular vs as needed treatment

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beta2-adrenergic agonists delivered by inhalation are very widely used in asthma. There has been much controversy of the use and possible consequences of the use of these agents for regular, as opposed as-needed use in asthma.

OBJECTIVES

This review to assessed the clinical trial evidence to test whether using regular use of short-acting beta2-agonists reduced asthma control and pulmonary function; worsened symptoms, airway reactivity and quality of life; and increased the rate of exacerbations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was carried out of the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register using the terms: regular AND [beta agonist OR bronchodilator OR salbutamol OR albuterol Or terbutaline OR isoproterenol OR reproterol OR fenoterol]. Bibliographies of existing trials were searched and primary trial authors and pharmaceutical companies were approached for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which the short-acting beta2-agonist was given regularly in the experimental group, together with an inhaled bronchodilator for relief of symptoms ('rescue use'). The control group consisted of matching placebo inhaled regularly, with an inhaled bronchodilator for as-needed 'rescue use'.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and quality assessments were made by both reviewers. Parallel group and cross-over trials were analysed separately. Where possible data were pooled using a fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 800 abstracts were identified, following a review, 60 papers were requested for full assessment by both reviewers. 34 trials from 30 papers met the entry criteria. Data from 31 outcomes were analyzable. There was little difference between the treatments for nearly all outcomes. In cross-over studies, evening peak flow was better with regular treatment, weighted mean difference (WMD) 13.1 l/min (95% confidence interval 24.3, 1.9). In contrast, the FEV1 was better with as-needed treatment (WMD 157 ml (95% CI: 123, 192). Bronchial hyper reactivity was slightly better in the as-needed group, standardised mean difference 0.23, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.12.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

These results support current guidelines. There is little advantage in using short-acting beta2-agonists regularly, and potentially some small clinical disadvantage.

Ten asthma pearls every primary care physician should know

Asthma is often easily identified and effectively treated. However, presenting symptoms are variable, and many cases of asthma may not be obvious or typical. Since asthma affects about 5% of the US population, primary care physicians should be prepared to identify and manage both atypical and classic types. Atypical symptoms include disturbed sleep, chest tightness, and persistent cough without audible wheezing. Occupational factors should be suspected in all cases of adult-onset asthma. The patient's history and results of simple pulmonary function tests are useful in diagnosing, staging, and managing asthma. A beta 2 agonist delivered by metered-dose inhaler (e.g., albuterol) should provide prompt relief of most exacerbations. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy delivered via a spacer helps prevent exacerbations and has an important role in long-term control of moderate and severe asthma. If symptoms do not improve with the use of standard asthma medications, alternative diagnoses should be considered.