Antithrombotic therapy in patients with saphenous vein and internal mammary artery bypass grafts

Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND

Morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure is high, and this predisposes them to thrombotic complications, including stroke and thromboembolism, which in turn contribute to high mortality. Oral anticoagulants (e.g. warfarin) and antiplatelet agents (e.g. aspirin) are the principle oral antithrombotic agents. Many heart failure patients with sinus rhythm take aspirin because coronary artery disease is the leading cause of heart failure. Oral anticoagulants have become a standard in the management of heart failure with atrial fibrillation. However, a question remains regarding the appropriateness of oral anticoagulants in heart failure with sinus rhythm. This update of a review previously published in 2012 aims to address this question.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of oral anticoagulant therapy versus antiplatelet agents for all-cause mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events and risk of major bleeding in adults with heart failure (either with reduced or preserved ejection fraction) who are in sinus rhythm.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated the searches in September 2015 on CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE and Embase. We searched reference lists of papers and abstracts from cardiology meetings and contacted study authors for further information. We did not apply any language restrictions. Additionally, we searched two clinical trials registers: ClinicalTrials.gov (www.ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal apps.who.int/trialsearch/) (searched in July 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing antiplatelet therapy versus oral anticoagulation in adults with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm. Treatment had to last at least one month. We compared orally administered antiplatelet agents (aspirin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, dipyridamole) versus anticoagulant agents (coumarins, warfarin, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed the risks and benefits of antithrombotic versus antiplatelet therapy using relative measures of effects, such as risk ratios (RR), accompanied with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The data extracted included data relating to the study design, patient characteristics, study eligibility, quality, and outcomes. We used GRADE criteria to assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

This update identified one additional study for inclusion, adding data for 2305 participants. This addition more than doubled the overall number of patients eligible for the review. In total, we included four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 4187 eligible participants. All studies compared warfarin with aspirin. One RCT additionally compared warfarin with clopidogrel. All included RCTs studied patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Analysis of all outcomes for warfarin versus aspirin was based on 3663 patients from four RCTs. All-cause mortality was similar for warfarin and aspirin (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.13; 4 studies; 3663 participants; moderate quality evidence). Oral anticoagulation was associated with a reduction in non-fatal cardiovascular events, which included non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, peripheral arterial embolism (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.00; 4 studies; 3663 participants; moderate quality evidence). The rate of major bleeding events was twice as high in the warfarin groups (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.78; 4 studies; 3663 participants; moderate quality evidence). We generally considered the risk of bias of the included studies to be low.Analysis of warfarin versus clopidogrel was based on a single RCT (N = 1064). All-cause mortality was similar for warfarin and clopidogrel (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.21; 1 study; 1064 participants; low quality evidence). There were similar rates of non-fatal cardiovascular events (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.45; 1 study; 1064 participants; low quality evidence). The rate of major bleeding events was 2.5 times higher in the warfarin group (RR 2.47, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.91; 1 study; 1064 participants; low quality evidence). Risk of bias for this study can be summarised as low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence from RCTs to suggest that neither oral anticoagulation with warfarin or platelet inhibition with aspirin is better for mortality in systolic heart failure with sinus rhythm (high quality of the evidence for all-cause mortality and moderate quality of the evidence for non-fatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding events). Treatment with warfarin was associated with a 20% reduction in non-fatal cardiovascular events but a twofold higher risk of major bleeding complications (high quality of the evidence). We saw a similar pattern of results for the warfarin versus clopidogrel comparison (low quality of the evidence). At present, there are no data on the role of oral anticoagulation versus antiplatelet agents in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with sinus rhythm. Also, there were no data from RCTs on the utility of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants compared to antiplatelet agents in heart failure with sinus rhythm.

Prevention of cardioembolic stroke

Cardiac causes of ischemic stroke lead to severe neurological deficits from large intracranial artery occlusion compared to small vessel ischemic stroke. The most common cause of cardioembolic stroke is atrial fibrillation (AF), which has an increasing incidence with age. AF stroke trials demonstrate that anti-coagulation is superior to anti-platelet therapy in terms of ischemic stroke prevention. Recently, warfarin was compared with dabigatran, an oral, direct thrombin inhibitor, and was found to be at least equally effective in reducing ischemic stroke with less intracranial bleeding risk. Future research is investigating other direct thrombin inhibitors as potential alternatives to warfarin, which has a narrow therapeutic index, requires frequent blood monitoring, has multiple drug interactions, and a higher rate of intracranial bleeding. Other causes of cardioembolic stroke include myocardial infarction, left ventricular thrombus, reduced ejection fraction, valvular abnormalities, and endocarditis. Patent foramen ovale is a common finding on echocardiograms in patients with and without stroke (up to 20% of the population), and it is a controversial source of cryptogenic stroke. The best way to prevent cardioembolic stroke remains early detection and treatment of AF, and treating the underlying stroke mechanism. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is an emerging technology and reveals some sources of cardiac embolism missed by echocardiography, and might provide an additional diagnostic tool in investigating cardioembolic stroke.

Clopidogrel provides significantly greater inhibition of platelet activity than aspirin when combined with atorvastatin after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the effects of 2 different antiplatelet agents on platelet activity in patients receiv- ing atorvastatin after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We prospectively randomized 50 patients undergoing CABG into 2 groups; group 1 started to receive atorvastatin (10 mg) plus clopidogrel (75 mg; C + A, n = 25) and group 2 atorvastatin (10 mg) and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; 300 mg, ASA + A, n = 25) daily on postoperative day 1 and continued for 6 months after operation. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation and the expressions of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb, GpIIIa, P-selectin, and fibrinogen (Fg) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) binding to platelets were assessed preoperatively and at postoperative days 7, 90, and 180.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 59.6 +/- 7.6 years, and 82% of the patients were males. The combination of C + A markedly inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with ASA + A at postoperative days 90 and 180 (52% +/- 6.0% vs 56% +/- 7.25% and 19.6% +/- 3.2% vs 37% +/- 4.1%, P = .039 and P = .0001, respectively). The therapy of C + A significantly suppressed the expressions of GpIIIa at postoperative days 7, 90, and 180 (P = .0001, P = .0001, and P = .0001, respectively) and P-selectin at postoperative days 90 and 180 (P = .035 and P = .002, respectively) when compared to ASA + A. The expression of GpIIb was also significantly depressed at postoperative day 180 in group 1 when compared to group 2 (P = .0001). Low-density lipoprotein binding was significantly increased at day 180 postoperatively in both the groups (basal: 42.9% +/- 5.6% vs 45.3% +/- 4.4% and day 180: 60.3% +/- 4.6% vs 61.8% +/- 5.7%, P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that the combination of C + A is more effective than that of ASA + A in inhibiting ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and expression of major platelet receptors after CABG.

Crushed clopidogrel administered via nasogastric tube has faster and greater absorption than oral whole tablets

OBJECTIVES

To compare the absorption of 300 mg clopidogrel administered crushed via nasogastric (NG) tube versus whole tablets taken orally in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND

Earlier antiplatelet therapy has proven benefits in treatment of myocardial infarction and in patients undergoing PCI. Aspirin can be delivered early in crushed form via NG tube after CABG surgery to prevent graft occlusion. If clopidogrel given crushed via NG tube provides faster absorption, it could allow earlier clopidogrel loading.

METHODS

Nine healthy human subjects (34.7 +/- 11.1 years, 5 males) were given 300 mg clopidogrel in crushed form via NG tube with 30 mL water after 8 hours of fasting. Plasma levels of the primary circulating inactive clopidogrel metabolite SR26334 were measured after 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours of dosing. Following >or=2 week washout, same subjects swallowed 300 mg clopidogrel (four 75 mg tablets) after an 8-hour fasting and SR26334 levels were measured at the same time points.

RESULTS

Plasma SR26334 concentrations peaked earlier after crushed delivery than after oral intake (44 vs. 70 minutes, P = 0.023) and the median peak was 80% higher (13,083 vs. 7,255 ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.021). At 40 minutes, area under the curve was almost twofold greater with NG administration than oral administration (geometric means ratio = 0.5299, 95% CI = 0.28-0.99, P = 0.048), but was similar over the 24-hour period with both administration methods (geometric means ratio = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.84-1.32, P = 0.646).

CONCLUSIONS

A 300 mg loading dose of crushed clopidogrel administered via NG tube provides faster and greater bioavailability than an equal dose taken orally as whole tablets. The clinical benefits of this strategy need to be investigated.

Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and other major cardiac sources of embolism

The frequency of cardioembolic stroke is expected to rise as the general population ages. Much of the increase may be attributed to atrial fibrillation, the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke and one that plays a substantial role in aging adults. Other sources of cardioembolic stroke may include ventricular thrombus from myocardial infarction, heart failure, structural heart defects such as patent foramen ovale (PFO), atrial septal aneurysm, proximal aortic atheroma, valvular heart disease, and endocarditis. Diagnostic studies, such as neuroimaging, ECG, and echocardiography, are helpful in uncovering cardioembolic sources of stroke. Medical therapy is predicated on the underlying mechanism. For example, warfarin may be indicated in certain patients who have atrial fibrillation, atrial, or ventricular thrombi, and PFO with atrial septal aneurysm and cryptogenic stroke in select young patients to prevent stroke. Newer diagnostic technologies, including multidetector CT and cardiac MRI, may be useful to diagnose cardiac causes of stroke when transesophageal echocardiography is indeterminate or cryptogenic stroke is present.

The primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

The following chapter devoted to antithrombotic therapy for chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al in this supplement, CHEST 2008; 133[suppl]:123S-131S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) we recommend daily oral aspirin (75-100 mg) [Grade 1A]. For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend clopidogrel, 75 mg/d (Grade 1A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we suggest discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and those with stable CAD and patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we recommend daily aspirin (75-100 mg) as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). We recommend clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients experiencing ST-segment elevation (STE) and NSTE-ACS (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend clopidogrel as monotherapy (Grade 1A). For long-term treatment after PCI in patients who receive antithrombotic agents such as clopidogrel or warfarin, we recommend aspirin (75 to 100 mg/d) [Grade 1B]. For patients who undergo bare metal stent placement, we recommend the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 4 weeks (Grade 1A). We recommend that patients receiving drug-eluting stents (DES) receive aspirin (325 mg/d for 3 months followed by 75-100 mg/d) and clopidogrel 75 mg/d for a minimum of 12 months (Grade 2B). For primary prevention in patients with moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75-100 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1A).

[Prevention of venous thromboembolism following cardiac, vascular or thoracic surgery]

In the absence of thromboprophylaxis, coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), intrathoracic surgery (thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopy), abdominal aortic surgery and infrainguinal vascular surgery are high-risk surgeries for the development of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). The incidence of VTE following surgery of the intrathoracic aorta, carotid endarterectomy or mediastinoscopy is unknown. Data from the litterature are lacking to draw evidence-based recommandations for venous thromboprophylaxis after these three types of surgeries, and the following guidelines are but experts'opinions (Grade D recommendations). Thromboprophylaxis is recommended after CABG (Grade D), with either subcutaneous (SC) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or SC or intravenous (i.v.) unfractioned heparin (UH) (PTT target = 1.1-1.5 time control value) (both grade D). This may be combined with the use of intermittent pneumatic compression device (Grade B). After valve surgery. The anticoagulation recommended to prevent valve thrombosis is sufficient in order to prevent VTE. We recommend thromboprophylaxis with either LMWH or low dose UH to prevent VTE after aortic or lower limbs infrainguinal vascular surgery (both grade B and D). Vitamine K antagonists (VKA) are not recommended in this indication (Grade D). We recommend thromprophylaxis following intrathoracic surgery via thoracotomy or videoassisted thoracoscopy (grade C). Either subcutaneous LMWH or subcutaneous or i.v. low dose UH may be used (Grade C). Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression device has been demonstrated in a study (grade C). VKA are not recommended (grade D). No further recommendation regarding the duration of thromboprophylaxis after these three types of surgeries can be made.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Saphenous Vein and Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts

This chapter about prevention of coronary artery bypass occlusion is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, starting 6 h after operation over preoperative aspirin (Grade 1A). In patients in whom postoperative bleeding prevents the administration of aspirin at 6 h after CABG, we recommend starting aspirin as soon as possible thereafter (Grade 1C). For patients undergoing CABG, we recommend against addition of dipyridamole to aspirin therapy (Grade 1A). For patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG who are allergic to aspirin, we recommend clopidogrel, 300 mg, as a loading dose 6 h after operation followed by 75 mg/d p.o. (Grade 1C+). In patients who undergo CABG for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we recommend clopidogrel, 75 mg/d for 9 to 12 months following the procedure in addition to treatment with aspirin (Grade 1A). For patients who have received clopidogrel for ACS and are scheduled for CABG, we recommend discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). For patients undergoing CABG who have no other indication for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), we suggest clinicians to not administer VKAs (Grade 2B). For patients undergoing CABG in whom oral anticoagulants are indicated, such as those with heart valve replacement, we suggest clinicians administer VKA in addition to aspirin (Grade 2C). For all patients with coronary artery disease who undergo internal mammary artery (IMA) bypass grafting, we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, indefinitely (Grade 1A). For all patients undergoing IMA bypass grafting without other indication for VKA, we suggest clinicians not use VKA (Grade 2C).

Indirect comparison meta-analysis of aspirin therapy after coronary surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of low and medium dose aspirin therapy after coronary surgery by using an indirect comparison meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, and trial register sites on the internet.

STUDY SELECTION

Outcome was evaluated by angiography and reported as graft occlusion and rate of events in patients. Trials that did not include aspirin as the sole therapy or did not have a placebo control arm were excluded. Articles were assessed for eligibility and quality and grouped according to dosage. The estimated difference in effect of low and medium dose aspirin on graft occlusion was obtained by combining the estimated log relative risks of low dose with placebo and medium dose with placebo.

RESULTS

For graft occlusion, the medium dose trials yielded a relative risk reduction of 45% compared with 26% for the low dose trials. The greater effect in the medium dose trials is summarised by a relative risk ratio of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.52 to 1.06; P = 0.10) for graft occlusion and 0.81 (0.57 to 1.16; P = 0.25) for events in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Medium dose aspirin may more successfully reduce graft occlusion than low dose regimens within the first year after coronary surgery.

The effect of preoperative aspirin-free interval on red blood cell transfusion requirements in cardiac surgical patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare red blood cell transfusion in first-time coronary artery surgery patients who stopped taking aspirin < or = 2 days, 3 to 7 days, or >7 days preoperatively.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

University-affiliated teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients (n = 797) undergoing first-time coronary artery surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass who were not receiving other anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs before surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were divided into 4 groups based on days since last ingestion of aspirin. Blood products transfused in the groups were (aspirin < or =2 days) (n = 140) 2.2 +/- 4 U of red cell concentrate (RCC) (mean +/- SD), 1.4 +/- 3 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and 2.7 +/- 6 U of platelets; (aspirin 3 to 5 days) (n = 255), 1.5 +/- 2 U of RCC, 0.8 +/- 2 U of FFP, and 1.6 +/- 4 U of platelets; (aspirin 6 to 7 days) (n = 215), 1.6 +/- 3 U of RCC, 0.9 +/- 3 U of FFP, and 1.5 +/- 3 U of platelets; and (aspirin >7 days) (n = 187), 1.3 +/- 2 U of RCC; 0.6 +/- 2 U of FFP, and 0.9 +/- 2 U of platelets.

CONCLUSION

Patients who stop taking aspirin < or =2 s preoperatively have increased allogenic red blood cell transfusion requirements perioperatively. Patients who stop taking aspirin 3 to 7 days preoperatively have little or no increased requirement for allogenic red blood cell transfusion.

The endothelin system in human saphenous vein graft disease

Saphenous vein graft stenosis is a significant clinical complication for coronary artery bypass patients. Endothelin-1, a peptide synthesised by vascular endothelial cells, is the most potent known vasoconstrictor and has mitogenic properties. Recent advances in our knowledge of endothelin-1 synthesis and endothelin receptor expression and function in normal and atherosclerotic human saphenous vein imply a role for the peptide in the progression of vein graft failure. Manipulation of the endothelin system, by selective receptor antagonism or inhibition of the specific endothelin-converting enzymes may, therefore, represent a novel therapeutic target for treating vein graft disease.

Antiplatelet agents versus control or anticoagulation for heart failure in sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure is high, it predisposes to stroke and thromboembolism which in turn contribute to high mortality in heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

To determine effect of antiplatelet agents when compared to placebo or anticoagulant therapy on death and/or major thromboembolic events in adults with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE). Abstracts from cardiology meetings and reference lists of relevant papers were searched. Authors of studies were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group placebo or controlled trials comparing antiplatelet therapy with control or anticoagulation in adults with chronic heart failure in sinus rhythm. Treatment for at least 1 month. To assess any adverse effects cohort study & non-randomised controlled studies were assessed. Orally administered antiplatelet agents e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, TICLOPIDINE, CLOPIDOGREL, DIPYRIDAMOLE, ASPIRIN compared with anticoagulant agents e.g. COUMARINS, WARFARIN or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. No meta-analyses were performed as no data were available from randomised comparisons. The data extracted included data relating to the complexities of the topic area, such as patient characteristics and concomitant treatments, as well as data relating to study eligibility, quality, and outcomes. Non-randomised studies were used to identify side-effects caused by anticoagulants.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT of warfarin, aspirin versus no antithrombotic therapy was found but no definitive data have yet been published. Three retrospective, non-randomised cohort studies from the V-HeFT, SOLVD and SAVE trials examining the role of ACE inhibitors have examined the role of aspirin therapy +/- anticoagulant therapy in patients with heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The results from these trials were conflicting.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

At present there is no evidence from long term RCTs to recommend use of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm. A possible interaction with ACE inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of aspirin, although this evidence is from retrospective analyses of trial cohorts. There is also no evidence to indicate superior effects from oral anticoagulation, when compared to aspirin, in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm.

A European view on the North American fifth consensus on antithrombotic therapy

An American-Canadian group of experts have, in the November 1998 issue of CHEST, published for the fifth time their recommendations for antithrombotic therapy. This remarkable consensus document was the result of an extensive review of the literature by an interdisciplinary group. Considering the impact of this document on medical practice, also outside North America, a group of European experts reviewed in detail the fifth report, particularly the sections on clinical indications of antithrombotic treatment. The aim was not to indicate the many areas of agreement and to quote literature that has become available since publication of the last consensus documents, but rather to refer to the gray zones of uncertainty and limited number of divergent opinions.

[Practice guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for the use of antithrombotic treatment in cardiology]

The indications for the use of antithrombotic therapy are evolving as new drugs become available or new indications or dosages are recommended for drugs already in use. This document reviews and updates the former one published in 1994. To that end, an exhaustive revision of the literature published in the last 15 years has been undertaken. Following the evidence based medicine dictates, and aiming to select all the relevant publications for each pathology, all studies were selected through MEDLINE, using the specified key words for each subject, and were filtered using the following steps: a) only randomized, controlled studies, meta-analysis, guidelines and review articles were chosen; b) then, the Best-Evidence and Cochrane Collaboration databases were consulted; c) finally, the evidence based medicine validation, relevance and applicability criteria were assessed for each publication. The use of antiaggregants and anticoagulants are given for the following conditions: a) prevention of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism; b) prevention of systemic emboli in patients with lone atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation associated or not with rheumatic heart disease, in patients with biological or mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses and in dilated cardiomyopathy; c) antithrombotic therapy in coronary heart disease and in coronary intervention; d) the interactions with oral anticoagulants and how to control these therapies are also discussed.