Lung volume reduction surgery: a survey on the European experience

[Emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery--a case report]

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been proposed as a palliative therapy in severe emphysema, with good results in lung function improvement, exercise capacity and quality of life. The authors present a case report of a 34 years old man with severe, heterogeneous lung emphysema submit to bilateral LVRS in 2000 January. Pre-surgical conditions, clinical and radiological evolution after surgery and for a 30 months follow up were analysed. Based on a literature revision, some technical aspects of LVRS, selection criteria and comparative study of medical and surgical therapy were discussed.

Anaesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery is a surgical treatment for severe emphysema that is increasing in popularity. The aim is to reverse the hyperexpansion of the lungs that leads to expiratory airflow limitation, compromises the diaphragm and chest wall mechanics, and tamponades the right ventricle. Optimal patient selection has not yet been established, but it has become clear that those patients with the most severe disease have an unacceptably high surgical mortality. The anaesthetic management of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery requires a good understanding of both the pathophysiology of the disease and the surgical procedure. It is important for the anaesthetist and the surgeon to work closely, supported by a large multidisciplinary team. Excellent analgesia is essential to a successful outcome; whether this is best provided by thoracic epidural is as yet unclear.

Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to improve lung function, exercise performance, and quality of life in highly selected individuals with severe emphysema; however, major questions regarding the efficacy and long-term outcomes of LVRS still remain unanswered. Pending the results of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Australian and New Zealand LVRS Database was created to audit local clinical practice and patient outcomes.

AIMS

To review patient selection, surgical activity, and patient outcomes related to LVRS in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

Prospective data were voluntarily submitted by hospitals performing LVRS in Australia and New Zealand. Preoperative, surgical, perioperative, and follow-up variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 15 hospitals regarding 529 patients. Mean age (+/- SD) at surgery was 63 +/- 7 years. Preoperatively, FEV(1) was 29 +/- 9% predicted, total lung capacity (TLC) was 138 +/- 20% predicted, residual volume (RV) was 250 +/- 64% predicted, and 6-min walk (6MW) distance was 327 +/- 111 m. There has been a reduction in the overall number of cases and hospitals performing LVRS since 1999. Improvements in lung function following LVRS (ie, FEV(1) increase of 38%, RV decrease of 27%, TLC decrease of 17%) and exercise capacity (ie, 6MW distance increase of 24%) appear to be maintained for approximately 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

LVRS continues to be performed in Australia and New Zealand, predominantly in large tertiary teaching hospitals with similar outcomes to those described in the literature. It remains difficult to capture long-term lung function and survival outcomes in this population. Ongoing audit and RCTs are both required to resolve the confusion that still shrouds this procedure.

Influence of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on health related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of LVRS has been questioned in the absence of trials comparing it with pulmonary rehabilitation, the prevailing standard of care in COPD. Patients with heterogeneous emphysema are more likely to benefit from volume reduction than those with homogeneous disease. Disease specific quality of life is a responsive interpretable outcome that enables health professionals to identify the magnitude of the effect of an intervention across several domains.

METHODS

Non-smoking patients aged <75 years with severe COPD (FEV(1) <40% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC <0.7), hyperinflation, and evidence of heterogeneity were randomised to surgical or control groups after pulmonary rehabilitation and monitored at 3 month intervals for 12 months with no crossover between the groups. The primary outcome was disease specific quality of life as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). Treatment failure was defined as death or functional decline (fall of 1 unit in any two domains of the CRQ). Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function and exercise capacity.

RESULTS

LVRS resulted in significant between group differences in each domain of the CRQ at 12 months (change of 0.5 represents a small but important difference): dyspnoea 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.6; p<0.0001); emotional function 1.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.1; p<0.0001); fatigue 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6; p<0.0001); mastery 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.5; p<0.0001). In the control group one of 27 patients died and 16 experienced functional decline over 12 months. In the surgical group four of 28 patients died and three experienced functional decline (hazard ratio = 3.1 (95% CI 1.3 to 7.6; p=0.01). Between group improvements (p<0.05) in lung volumes, flow rates, and exercise were sustained at 12 months (RV -47% predicted (95% CI -71 to -23; p=0.0002); FEV(1) 0.3 l (95% CI 0.1 to 0. 5; p=0.0003); submaximal exercise 7.3 min (95% CI 3.9 to 10.8; p<0.0001); 6 minute walk 66 metres (95% CI 32 to 101; p=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

In COPD patients with heterogeneous emphysema, LVRS resulted in important benefits in disease specific quality of life compared with medical management, which were sustained at 12 months after treatment.

Health-related quality of life after lung volume reduction surgery

Many studies have demonstrated short-term physiologic benefits and improvements in various measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). However, LVRS involves short-term risks of morbidity, disability, and mortality. Few reports describe the long-term effects of LVRS on patients with emphysema. Rational decision making about LVRS depends on whether the expected improvement in quality of life from LVRS outweighs the expected disability and morbidity and the potential mortality from the procedure. This report describes the HRQOL and survival outcomes of patients with emphysema after LVRS.

Psychiatric issues in pulmonary disease

This article has attempted to provide an overview of the clinical literature regarding the psychological issues facing patients with pulmonary disease, depending on when the illness begins in the life span, because different developmental tasks are disrupted. Patients must contend with side effects of medication that may mimic or exacerbate psychiatric disorders. The main drug interactions for psychiatrists to be aware of in this patient population occur between rifampin, or theophylline and psychotropic medications. In lung transplant recipients on cyclosporine therapy, the antidepressant drug nefazadone may cause increased cyclosporine levels. Psychiatrists must be aware of the risks, benefits, and survival statistics; educate patients; and ascertain whether the patient is competent to make medical decisions regarding treatment procedures.