Hemodynamic improvement following a single dose of oral phentolamine. Administration in patients with chronic low output cardiac failure

Penile erection and cardiac risk: pathophysiologic and pharmacologic mechanisms

Erection is initiated through the parasympathetic nervous system, activation of which overrides the sympathetic tone that maintains the penis in a nonerectile (flaccid) state. This state is maintained mainly through the release of norepinephrine from penile adrenergic nerves. Norepinephrine contracts the vasculature and cavernosal smooth muscle. Arousal/erection is associated with a decrease of norepinephrine release in the penis, with a release of nitric oxide, and with a reduction in penile smooth muscle tone. It is also associated with minor cardiovascular changes. Heart rate increases by 4-8 beats per minute, on average, and the rate-pressure product and oxygen consumption increase by approximately 25%. There may be no changes in systemic venous norepinephrine concentrations; systemic venous epinephrine concentrations increase by about 60%. Drugs initiating or enhancing erection act by inhibiting norepinephrine-induced contraction (e.g., phentolamine) or by enhancing or directly inducing relaxation of the corpora cavernosa and the penile vasculature (e.g., sildenafil). Despite potentially negative hemodynamic actions when given parenterally, oral phentolamine-in doses required for enhancing erection-appears to produce few cardiovascular adverse effects. The hemodynamic effects of sildenafil are small, even in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the effects of the drug on human myocardium have not been conclusively established, and should be further investigated. As judged by available information, the cardiac risk associated with erection, with or without enhancement of drugs currently used for treatment of erectile dysfunction, is low.

Medical management of chronic heart failure: inotropic, vasodilator, or inodilator drugs?

On the basis of pathophysiologic mechanisms, the medical therapy of today for chronic heart failure is reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the vasodilator drugs and the inotropic drugs are presented. Finally, the therapeutic value of the inodilator drugs, which combine the central myocardial effects of positive inotropic agents with those of peripheral vasodilators, is discussed. In particular, the orally available dopaminergic agents, such as ibopamine, which interact with beta-receptors in the heart (mediating a positive inotropic effect) as well as with dopaminergic receptors in the peripheral vessels (mediating a systemic vasodilator effect) and in the kidneys (potentiating the natriuretic effect of diuresis), seem to be an advancement in the modern medical therapy of chronic heart failure. Data are shown during long-term treatment with ibopamine, in which the sustained clinical benefit in heart failure was not diminished, despite a decrease of the adrenergic receptors in blood cells. Dopamine plasma concentration was permanently normalized during long-term treatment. The discrepancy between clinical improvement and the measured adrenergic downregulation may be due to the interference of the inodilator with neurohormonal systems at multiple sites and is probably independent of receptor activation. It is suggested that the biosynthesis of noradrenaline is improved by increasing intracellular dopamine transport.

Hemodynamic effects of continuous infusion of AR-C 239 in left ventricular failure

AR-C 239 is a new specific alpha 1 antagonist drug with an action similar to that of prazosin. In dogs it appears to be specific for the alpha 1 adrenoreceptor. AR-C 239 was tested in 11 patients (49 +/- 11 years old) with left heart failure, who had not received any previous treatment. The drug was infused intravenously with a stepwise increase in dose, producing three stable plasma concentration plateaus: 10 +/- 2, 51 +/- 3, and 138 +/- 55 ng/ml. Hemodynamic data were collected at time T0 before drug infusion, and half-way through each infusion. Blood pressures and cardiac output were recorded using a Millar microtip manometer (left ventricle), a Swan-Ganz catheter (pulmonary artery), and a femoral catheter, connected to a Syscomoram computer system which calculated the following parameters: work, resistances, tension-time index and contractility indices. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes were obtained from cineangiograms performed 30 min before drug infusion and at the end of the third infusion plateau. AR-C 239 produces a dose-dependent fall in systemic blood pressure (r = 0.539, n = 33, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Vasodilator and inotropic drugs for the treatment of chronic heart failure: distinguishing hype from hope

During the past 10 years, more than 80 orally active vasodilator and inotropic agents have been tested in the clinical setting to evaluate their potential utility in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the initial reports of all of these drugs suggested that each represented a major therapeutic advance, only three agents--digoxin, captopril and enalapril--have produced consistent long-term hemodynamic and clinical benefits in these severely ill patients. Most of the other drugs that have been tested have not (to date) distinguished themselves from placebo therapy in large-scale, controlled trials, even though these agents produce hemodynamic effects that closely resemble those seen with digitalis and the converting-enzyme inhibitors. These observations suggest that the hemodynamic derangements that characteristically accompany the development of left ventricular dysfunction cannot be considered to be the most important pathophysiologic abnormality in chronic heart failure. Although cardiac contractility is usually depressed in this disease, positive inotropic agents do not consistently improve the clinical status of these patients. Similarly, although the systemic vessels are usually markedly constricted, drugs that ameliorate this vasoconstriction do not consistently relieve symptoms, enhance exercise capacity or prolong life. Hence, correction of the central hemodynamic abnormalities seen in heart failure may not necessarily provide a rational basis for drug development, and future advances in therapy are likely to evolve only by attempting to understand and modify the basic physiologic derangements in this disorder.