Adverse effect of propranolol on airway function in nonasthmatic chronic obstructive lung disease

Rare complication - skin atrophy - after systemic conservative therapy of infantile hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Hemangiomas, also called infantile hemangiomas (IH) or hemangiomas of infancy are the most frequently seen benign vascular tumors of infancy. Different types of hemangiomas are described in the literature. The current approach is to assess the risk and, if needed, first line treatment is to initiate systemic propranolol.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 3-month-old Caucasian female patient was brought as an outpatient. The main complaint was an infantile hemangioma in the facial area, which as per the parents' story appeared within a week of birth like a small reddish line and it rapidly grew. Systemic propranolol was proposed as a first-line treatment and the adverse effects were explained. The parents, afraid of the side effects, wanted to explore other possibilities such as topical timolol, however, since it had no effect, propranolol was initiated in the end. Hemangioma was completely reduced in size; however, a skin defect was detected. As per the dermatologist's counsel, topical cream was initiated. The skin defect was reduced but not fully healed. The child is still being monitored periodically.

CONCLUSION

After successful treatment of hemangioma, we identified a skin defect, which was very similar to steroid-induced skin atrophy. However, we cannot attribute this to a single factor. The only thing that can be concluded is that the subject needs a thorough studying, since rate of infantile hemangioma is high, and pediatricians need a clear management strategy of how to approach skin atrophy after successfully treating the hemangioma itself.

Beta-blocker therapy in patients with COPD: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis with multiple treatment comparison

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are associated with reduced mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease but are often under prescribed in those with concomitant COPD, due to concerns regarding respiratory side-effects. We investigated the effects of beta-blockers on outcomes in patients with COPD and explored within-class differences between different agents.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Medline for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of beta-blocker exposure versus no exposure or placebo, in patients with COPD, with and without cardiovascular indications. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association of beta-blocker therapy with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), and a network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of individual beta-blockers on FEV1. Mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and quality of life outcomes were narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

We included 23 observational studies and 14 RCTs. In pooled observational data, beta-blocker therapy was associated with an overall reduced risk of AECOPD versus no therapy (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.85). Among individual beta-blockers, only propranolol was associated with a relative reduction in FEV1 versus placebo, among 199 patients evaluated in RCTs. Narrative syntheses on mortality, all-cause hospitalization and quality of life outcomes indicated a high degree of heterogeneity in study design and patient characteristics but suggested no detrimental effects of beta-blocker therapy on these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The class effect of beta-blockers remains generally positive in patients with COPD. Reduced rates of AECOPD, mortality, and improved quality of life were identified in observational studies, while propranolol was the only agent associated with a deterioration of lung function in RCTs.

Chemical Intuition in Drug Design and Discovery

The medicinal chemist plays the most important role in drug design, discovery and development. The primary goal is to discover leads and optimize them to develop clinically useful drug candidates. This process requires the medicinal chemist to deal with large sets of data containing chemical descriptors, pharmacological data, pharmacokinetics parameters, and in silico predictions. The modern medicinal chemist has a large number of tools and technologies to aid him in creating strategies and supporting decision-making. Alongside with these tools, human cognition, experience and creativity are fundamental to drug research and are important for the chemical intuition of medicinal chemists. Therefore, fine-tuning of data processing and in-house experience are essential to reach clinical trials. In this article, we will provide an expert opinion on how chemical intuition contributes to the discovery of drugs, discuss where it is involved in the modern drug discovery process, and demonstrate how multidisciplinary teams can create the optimal environment for drug design, discovery, and development.

Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocker therapy has a proven mortality benefit in patients with hypertension, heart failure and coronary artery disease, as well as during the perioperative period. These drugs have traditionally been considered contraindicated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of cardioselective beta-blockers on respiratory function of patients with COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (derived from systematic searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) was carried out to identify randomised blinded controlled trials from 1966 to May 2005. We did not exclude trials on the basis of language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, blinded, controlled trials of single dose or longer duration that studied the effects of cardioselective beta-blockers on the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or symptoms in patients with COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data from the selected articles, reconciling differences by consensus. Two interventions studied were the administration of beta-blocker, given either as a single dose or for longer duration, and the use of beta2-agonist given after the study drug.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies of single-dose treatment and 9 of treatment for longer durations, ranging from 2 days to 12 weeks, met selection criteria. Cardioselective beta-blockers, given as a single dose or for longer duration, produced no change in FEV1 or respiratory symptoms compared to placebo, and did not affect the FEV1 treatment response to beta2-agonists. A subgroup analysis revealed no change in results for those participants with severe chronic airways obstruction or for those with a reversible obstructive component.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Cardioselective beta-blockers, given to patients with COPD in the identified studies did not produce adverse respiratory effects. Given their demonstrated benefit in conditions such as heart failure, coronary artery disease and hypertension, cardioselective beta-blockers should not be routinely withheld from patients with COPD.

Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocker therapy has a proven mortality benefit in patients with hypertension, heart failure and coronary artery disease, as well as during the perioperative period. These drugs have traditionally been considered contraindicated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of cardioselective beta-blockers on respiratory function of patients with COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL was performed using the Cochrane Airways Group registry to identify randomised blinded controlled trials from 1966 to May 2001. The search was completed using the terms: asthma*, bronchial hyperreactivity*, respiratory sounds*, wheez*, obstructive lung disease* or obstructive airway disease*, and adrenergic antagonist*, sympatholytic* or adrenergic receptor block*. We did not exclude trials on the basis of language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, blinded, controlled trials of single dose or longer duration that studied the effects of cardioselective beta-blockers on the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or symptoms in patients with COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data from the selected articles, reconciling differences by consensus. Two interventions studied were the administration of beta-blocker, given either as a single dose or for longer duration, and the use of beta2-agonist given after the study drug.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies of single-dose treatment and 8 of treatment for longer duration, ranging from 2 days to 12 weeks, met selection criteria. Cardioselective beta-blockers produced no statistically significant change in FEV1 or respiratory symptoms compared to placebo, given as a single dose (Weighted Mean Difference -2.05% [95% Confidence interval, -6.05 to 1.96%]) or for longer duration (WMD -2.55% [95% CI, -5.94 to 0.84]), and did not significantly affect the FEV1 treatment response to beta2-agonists. Exacerbations and hospitalizations were recorded in all trials, but none occurred during the periods of study, in either group. A subgroup analysis revealed no significant change in results for those participants with severe chronic airways obstruction or for those with a reversible obstructive component.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that cardioselective beta-blockers, given to patients with COPD do not produce a significant short-term reduction in airway function or in the incidence of COPD exacerbations. However, the trials were small and of short duration. Given their demonstrated benefit in conditions such as heart failure, coronary artery disease and hypertension, cardioselective beta-blockers should be considered for patients with COPD, but administered with careful monitoring since data concerning long term administration and their effects during exacerbations are not available.

Drug-induced pulmonary disease

Drug-induced disease of any system or organ can be associated with high morbidity and mortality, and it is tremendously costly to the health care of our country. More than 100 medications are known to affect the lungs adversely, including the airways in the form of cough and asthma, the interstitium with interstitial pneumonitis and noncardiac pulmonary edema, and the pleura with pleural effusions. Patients commonly do not even know what medications they are taking, do not bring them to the physician's office for identification, and usually do not relate over-the-counter medications with any problems they have. They assume that all nonprescription drugs are safe. Patients also believe that if they are taking prescription medications at their discretion, meaning on an as-needed basis, then these medications are also not important. This situation stresses just how imperative it is for the physician to take an accurate drug history in all patients seen with unexplained medical situations. Cardiovascular drugs that most commonly produce a pulmonary abnormality are amiodarone, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and beta-blockers. Pulmonary complications will develop in 6% of patients taking amiodarone and 15% taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, with the former associated with interstitial pneumonitis that can be fatal and the latter associated with an irritating cough that is not associated with any pathologic or physiologic sequelae of consequence. The beta-blockers can aggravate obstructive lung disease in any patient taking them. Of the antiinflammatory agents, acetylsalicyclic acid can produce several different airway and parenchymal complications, including aggrevation of asthma in up to 5% of patients with asthma, a noncardiac pulmonary edema when levels exceed 40 mg/dl, and a pseudosepsis syndrome. More than 200 products contain aspirin. Low-dose methotrexate is proving to be a problem because granulomatous interstitial pneumonitis develops in 5% of those patients receiving it. This condition occurs most often in patients receiving the drug for rheumatoid arthritis, but it has been reported in a few patients receiving it for refractory asthma. Chemotherapeutic drug-induced lung disease is almost always associated with fever, thus mimicking opportunistic infection, which is the most common cause of pulmonary complications in the immunocompromised host. However, in 10% to 15% of patients, the pulmonary infiltrate is due to an adverse effect from a chemotherapeutic agent. This complication is frequently fatal even when recognized early.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Is xamoterol safe in chronic airflow obstruction?

We have demonstrated in a group of 10 patients with CAO that treatment with xamoterol (200 mg b.i.d. for 7 days) did not alter lung function or respiratory symptoms. These results suggest that xamoterol can be used to treat mild heart failure in patients with CAO.

Esmolol and ventilatory function in cardiac patients with COPD

To assess the effects of acute cardioselective beta blockade on ventilatory function in patients with COPD and active cardiac disorders, 50 patients were studied during intravenous infusion of esmolol. All patients had an obstructive ventilatory component on baseline pulmonary function testing, and 58 percent had a significant bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol. Esmolol infusion (8 to 24 mg/min) produced large decreases in heart rate (84 +/- 2 to 69 +/- 2 beats/min, p less than 0.01) and SBP (124 +/- 3 to 106 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). Despite this marked hemodynamic response, there was no significant group effect of beta blockade on pulmonary function. No patient experienced dyspnea or wheezing with acute esmolol infusion; however, three patients (6 percent) developed asymptomatic decreases of FEV1. It is concluded that acute beta blockade with esmolol can be achieved in patients with COPD and cardiac disorders with little risk of bronchospasm.

Increased responsiveness to histamine after propranolol in subjects with asthma nonresponsive to the bronchoconstrictive effect of propranolol

Eight nonsmoking subjects with asthma, nonresponsive to the bronchoconstrictive effect of oral propranolol, were studied. The airway response to increasing concentrations of histamine aerosol was assessed by measuring FEV1. The threshold provocative dose of histamine needed to cause a 20% fall in starting FEV1 (PD20) was measured by log dose-response curve. Histamine challenge was performed in duplicate after premedication with placebo or 40 mg of propranolol on separate days. The mean starting FEV1 did not change significantly after placebo and after propranolol administration. The mean PD20 values after propranolol (0.37 mg/ml and 0.32 mg/ml, respectively, for the first and the second challenge) were significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than mean control PD20 values (1.36 mg/ml and 1.48 mg/ml, respectively, for the first and the second challenge). These results indicate that propranolol increases airway responsiveness to histamine, even in those subjects with asthma in whom propranolol has little bronchoconstrictive effect.

Cardiopulmonary effects of celiprolol and bisoprolol in serotonin-infused cats

The effects of celiprolol and bisoprolol on cardiopulmonary function in serotonin-infused cats were compared. Celiprolol reversed the bronchoconstrictive effect of serotonin at doses greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/kg. Also, decreases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate were noted after administration of 3-10 and 10 mg/kg celiprolol, respectively. In contrast, bisoprolol tended to induce bronchoconstriction. Reductions in mean arterial pressure and heart rate were observed with 1 or 3 mg/kg. Bisoprolol administration at 10 mg/kg was lethal. The unique ability of celiprolol to induce bronchodilation enhances its therapeutic potential.

Effects of single oral doses of bisoprolol and atenolol on airway function in nonasthmatic chronic obstructive lung disease and angina pectoris

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover investigation in 12 patients with non-asthmatic chronic obstructive lung disease and co-existing stable angina pectoris was done to compare two beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocking agents, atenolol 100 mg and bisoprolol 20 mg. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP), heart rate (HR) as well as airway resistance (AWR, and less frequently forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV) were measured in the sitting position before and at various times up to 24 h after drug intake. During the first 4 h both beta-blockers produced a significant reduction in HR in comparison to placebo (p less than 0.01). Atenolol 100 mg significantly increased AWR relative to placebo and bisoprolol (p less than 0.05). After 24 h, a significant reduction in HR (p less than 0.01) could only be demonstrated after bisoprolol, whereas atenolol alone led to a significant elevation in AWR relative to placebo and bisoprolol (p less than 0.05) at that time. It is concluded that bisoprolol appears to have a high degree of beta 1-selectivity, thus providing a wide split between beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor blockade. Bisoprolol in its therapeutic dose range is expected to be relatively safe as regards bronchoconstriction in patients suffering both from hypertension and/or angina pectoris and chronic obstructive lung disease.

Safety and efficacy of alinidine in symptom-free asthmatics

Alinidine is a new bradycardic agent which has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of coronary heart disease. Patients with both coronary heart disease and obstructive lung disease are difficult to treat, because the use of beta-blockers in them is greatly limited by their potential to provoke bronchospasm. Alinidine has no beta-blocking, muscarinic or quinidine-like properties. In a randomized double-blind cross-over study the heart rate reducing effect and safety of alinidine 40 mg p.o. has been examined in 12 symptom-free asthmatics. Alinidine significantly reduced mean heart rate from 81 +/- 10.5 beats/min to 65 +/- 9.7 beats/min two hours after administration. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), vital capacity (CV), airway resistance (Raw), functional residual capacity (FRC), and specific airway conductance (SGaw) were not affected. It is concluded that alinidine did not influence respiratory function in patients with bronchial hypersensitivity.

Comparison of the effects of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide on the ventilatory function of hypertensive patients with asthma and propranolol sensitivity

Previous studies have shown that labetalol, a new alpha- and beta-adrenergic antagonist, is relatively safe for the treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This multicenter study was designed to evaluate its effects in hypertensive patients with asthma and propranolol sensitivity. Hypertension was successfully controlled in 18 of 21 patients who received labetalol in increasing doses, up to 1,200 mg/day. The decrease in mean FEV1 (1.5 percent) two hours after the highest dose of labetalol was not statistically significant, although there was a gradual decline in mean baseline FEV1 during the four-week treatment period. Antihypertensive agents other than adrenergic antagonists should be considered for the management of hypertension in patients with asthma, especially those with marked reversibility of airflow. If treatment with beta-adrenergic antagonists is indicated, labetalol is recommended over other currently available agents.

Influence of cardioselectivity and respiratory disease on pulmonary responsiveness to beta-blockade

The effects on ventilation of the non-selective beta-blocker propranolol, and the relatively cardioselective beta-blocker, metoprolol, were compared in a randomized single-blind crossover study in 16 patients with asthma, bronchitis and emphysema (American Thoracic Society criteria). Group I had "fixed" airways disease with less than 20% improvement in FEV1 following inhaled salbutamol 5 mg by nebuliser. Group II had "reversible" obstruction, greater than 20% improvement. Bronchodilator therapy was withheld for 24 h with the exception of aerosols which were permitted until 12 h before study. After control observations on each of 2 study days, each patient received cumulative doses of propranolol (maximum 170 mg) and metoprolol (maximum 187.5 mg). Ventilatory function (FEV1, FVC, FEV1%) was assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h. In Group I, 2 patients were unable to complete the study. One patient became dizzy with propranolol 70 mg but tolerated metoprolol 187.5 mg. One patient developed wheeze with propranolol 15 mg but tolerated metoprolol 187.5 mg. Metoprolol was tolerated in all 8 patients with "fixed" disease, although FEV1 was reduced by more than 30% in 1 patient. Three patients in Group II did not complete the study because of wheezing following propranolol 10 mg, metoprolol 37.5 mg; propranolol 17.5 mg, metoprolol 37.5 mg; propranolol 45 mg, tolerated metoprolol 187.5 mg respectively. Wheezing responded in all cases to inhaled isoprenaline. The response to either propranolol or metoprolol was unpredictable in patients with "reversible" disease. When wheezing occurred in this group, it developed following small, potentially subtherapeutic doses of each drug. Although metoprolol was better tolerated, the practical benefit of cardioselectivity in those patients with reversible airways disease was negligible.

Comparison of the effects of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide on the ventilatory function of hypertensive patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Labetalol is a new adrenergic antagonist with both alpha- and beta-blocking effects. The effects of labetalol and hydrochlorothiazide on the hypertension and ventilatory function of patients with both hypertension and mild reversible chronic pulmonary disease were compared. In this double-blind study, 20 patients were randomly allocated to receive increasing doses of labetalol (100 to 400 mg three times a day) or hydrochlorothiazide (25 to 50 mg three times a day) over a four-week treatment period. Patients returned at weekly intervals for spirometry baseline, two hours after receiving the medication for the following week, and five minutes after an exercise test. Each treatment reduced the blood pressure significantly and to a comparable degree. There was no significant decrease in ventilatory function two hours after administration of the drug at any visit for either drug. Ventilatory function did not deteriorate significantly following exercise with either drug. With labetalol there was a progressive statistically significant decline in baseline forced expiratory volume in one second from 1,860 +/- 190 ml to 1,685 +/- 190 ml during the four-week study period, although no patient became symptomatic from shortness of breath. We conclude that labetalol is an effective antihypertensive agent that does not adversely effect ventilatory function immediately, but that may lead to a decline in ventilatory function when administered long-term.

Effects of labetalol in hypertensive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Labetalol is a new adrenergic antagonist with both alpha- and beta-blocking effects. To evaluate its usefulness in the treatment of hypertension in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), labetalol was administered in gradually increasing doses to a group of 11 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and COPD with a mild reversible component. Ten patients given hydrochlorothiazide served as control subjects. Blood pressure was controlled in seven of the 11 patients given labetalol and in six of the ten patients given hydrochlorothiazide in dosages up to 1,200 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively. No significant changes occurred in the FEV1 or FEF25-75% two hours after the administration of the maximum dose of either drug or after exercise on the same day. Labetalol was well tolerated in the doses given.