Renin and the complications of acute myocardial infarction

Global Longitudinal Strain May Be the One that Appropriately Identifies Candidates of ICD Implantation

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) significantly contributes to an elevated risk of sudden cardiac death. Primary prevention is implemented by using an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, all of the HCM patients do not really need ICD therapy. Providing a superior index for ICD indication compared with the current indices like ejection fraction is essential to differentiate high-risk patients efficiently. The present study assessed the potential of global longitudinal strain (GLS) for the differentiation of HCM patients based on their need for ICD shocks. Patients with HCM were considered in four defined centers between March and June 2021. Those with previous ICD implantation or current candidates for ICD therapy were included in the study. Participants were subjected to speckle-tracking echocardiography, and GLS as well as some other echocardiographic parameters were recorded. Afterwards, data from implanted ICDs were extracted. Patients who received ICD shocks (appropriate) due to ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) were categorized in group A. The remaining patients were constituted group B who received inappropriate shocks, i.e., other than VT/VF. Overall, 34 patients were found eligible to participate with a mean age of 62 ± 16.1 years including 64.7% of males. Among a variety of echocardiographic parameters, GLS was the sole one that was significantly higher in group A compared with that in group B. Our findings revealed that only GLS could predict fatal arrhythmias. To substantiate, the odds of VT were raised by 43% with a single increase in GLS unit. GLS showed the highest accuracy for ICD indication among HCM patients and, therefore, could be a solid and early criterion to predict the incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias. In this regard, identifying appropriate HCM patients with respect to their need for ICD therapy is feasible.

Heart rhythm complexity analysis in patients with inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Heart rhythm complexity (HRC), a subtype of heart rate variability (HRV), is an important tool to investigate cardiovascular disease. In this study, we aimed to analyze serial changes in HRV and HRC metrics in patients with inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 1 year postinfarct and explore the association between HRC and postinfarct left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment. We prospectively enrolled 33 inferior STEMI patients and 74 control subjects and analyzed traditional linear HRV and HRC metrics in both groups, including detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) and multiscale entropy (MSE). We also analyzed follow-up postinfarct echocardiography for 1 year. The STEMI group had significantly lower standard deviation of RR interval (SDNN), and DFAα2 within 7 days postinfarct (acute stage) comparing to control subjects. LF power was consistently higher in STEMI group during follow up. The MSE scale 5 was higher at acute stage comparing to control subjects and had a trend of decrease during 1-year postinfarct. The MSE area under scale 1-5 showed persistently lower than control subjects and progressively decreased during 1-year postinfarct. To predict long-term postinfarct LV systolic impairment, the slope between MSE scale 1 to 5 (slope 1-5) had the best predictive value. MSE slope 1-5 also increased the predictive ability of the linear HRV metrics in both the net reclassification index and integrated discrimination index models. In conclusion, HRC and LV contractility decreased 1 year postinfarct in inferior STEMI patients, and MSE slope 1-5 was a good predictor of postinfarct LV systolic impairment.

What Strain Analysis Adds to Diagnosis and Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients

Heart failure (HF) is a common disease that requires appropriate tools to correctly predict cardiovascular outcomes. Echocardiography represents the most commonly used method for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction and a cornerstone in the detection of HF, but it fails to procure an optimal level of inter-observer variability, leading to unsatisfactory prediction of cardiovascular outcomes. In this review, we discuss emerging clinical tools (global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle, the right ventricle, and the left atrium) that permitted an improvement in the diagnosis and ameliorated the risk stratification across different HF phenotypes. The review analyzes the speckle-tracking contributions to the field, discussing the limitations and advantages in clinical practice.

Myocardial strain to identify benefit from beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aims

Not all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) benefit equally from beta‐blockers. Previous studies suggest that myocardial strain that reflects myocardial deformation may have a better prognostic value than the left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to evaluate the differential effect of beta‐blockers according to the global longitudinal strain (GLS) in patients with HFrEF.

Methods and results

Of the 4312 patients in the Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Acute Heart Failure registry, we included 2126 HFrEF patients whose data on beta‐blocker use and GLS were available. Patients were categorized into two groups: one group of patients had GLS ≥ 10%, and the other group had GLS < 10%. The primary outcome was 5 year all‐cause mortality according to beta‐blocker use. Of the 2126 patients with HFrEF, 526 (24.7%) and 1600 (75.3%) patients had GLS ≥ 10% and <10%, respectively. Overall, 1399 patients (65.8%) received beta‐blockers, and 864 (40.6%) patients died during the 5 year follow‐up. Beta‐blocker use was associated with improved survival in patients with GLS < 10% in both the inverse probability treatment‐weighted (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.83, P < 0.001) and Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.81; P < 0.001). However, beta‐blocker use was not associated with better survival in patients with GLS ≥ 10% in the inverse probability treatment‐weighted and Cox regression analyses (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Beta‐blocker use appears to be associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and GLS < 10%, but this is not the case in patients with GLS ≥ 10%. Therefore, GLS may be used to identify patients who have attenuated benefits from beta‐blockers in HFrEF.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03513653 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03513653).

Global longitudinal strain for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure

AIMS

Currently, the ejection fraction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)] is the main criterion used for implanting implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention. However, many of ICD receivers would not have an event and do not have any gains from the device. Consequently, improving the discrimination strategies is needed. Here, we aimed at assessing the role of global longitudinal strain (GLS) for such purpose.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy cases characterized by LVEF ≤ 40% with a previously implanted ICD were enrolled. LVEF and GLS amounts were evaluated using 3D echocardiography. The occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias was checked by analysing the ICD history. Mean follow-up period of patients was 1.8 ± 0.6 years. There was a significant difference in the amount of GLS in arrhythmic cases compared with non-arrhythmic ones (-6.97 ± 3.06 vs -11.82 ± 4.25; P < 0.001). This difference was found in both ischaemic and dilated cardiomyopathy groups. A GLS below -10 cm/s could predict the occurrence of a ventricular event by 90% specificity and 72.2% sensitivity (area under the curve = 0.84, P < 0.001). While 27.39 (69.2%) patients with GLS below -10 cm/s had a ventricular event, only 3.31 (9.6%) of the patients with GLS above -10 had an event) P < 0.001). Those patients with a GLS ≥ 17 cm/s never experienced a ventricular arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

Global longitudinal strain is a more accurate predictor of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with reduced LVEF. Whether it may help in selecting more appropriate patients for ICD implantation or not should be evaluated within a randomized trial in the future.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade for cardiovascular disease prevention

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a significant role in pathophysiology of multiple disease states. RAAS blockade is beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, stroke, and diabetic renal disease. RAAS blockade with the combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has demonstrated conflicting results in recent clinical trials. This article reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use, their combination, and the role of aldosterone blockers and direct renin inhibitors in patients at risk, and makes recommendations for their use in the prevention of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for cardiovascular diseases: current status

Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) results in vasoconstriction, muscular (vascular and cardiac) hypertrophy and fibrosis. Established arterial stiffness and cardiac dysfunction are key factors contributing to subsequent cardiovascular and renal complications. Blockade of RAAS has been shown to be beneficial in patients with hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, chronic systolic heart failure, stroke and diabetic renal disease. An aggressive approach for more extensive RAAS blockade with combination of two commonly used RAAS blockers [ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)] yielded conflicting results in different patient populations. Combination therapy is also associated with more side effects, in particular hypotension, hyperkalaemia and renal impairment. Recently published ONTARGET study showed ACEI/ARB combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects without any increase in benefit. The Canadian Hypertension Education Program responded with a new warning: 'Do not use ACEI and ARB in combination'. However, the European Society of Cardiology in their updated heart failure treatment guidelines still recommended ACEI/ARB combo as a viable option. This apparent inconsistency among guidelines generates debate as to which approach of RAAS inhibition is the best. The current paper reviews the latest evidence of isolated ACEI or ARB use and their combination in cardiovascular diseases, and makes recommendations for their prescriptions in specific patient populations.

Captopril in acute myocardial infarction: beneficial effects on infarct size and arrhythmias

It is known from experiments that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors can limit infarct size. In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study, 22 patients were given 1.5-2.0 mg captopril/h i.v., while 24 patients were given placebo. Medication was started between 2 and 18 h from the onset of infarction. The two groups were matched for age, infarct location, and time of intervention. With the exception of one patient in either group, all were concurrently given nitroglycerin. The necrosis parameters were provided by the quantitative measurement of the QRS complex. The Q wave decreased with captopril treatment (-0.003 mV), but increased with placebo (+0.14 mV, p < 0.05). The number of ventricular premature beats at 24 h from the start of treatment was 25/h with placebo, and 9/h with captopril (p < 0.02). Ventricular fibrillation occurred seven times in the placebo group, but did not occur in the captopril group. The creatine kinase infarct weight was 59 gram-equivalents (gEq) with placebo, and 45 gEq with captopril (p = NS). Mean arterial pressure was reduced by 12 mmHg with captopril treatment. The results show a beneficial effect of captopril on infarct size and electrical instability, over and above the effect of standard management with nitroglycerin and thrombolysis.

Baroreflex sensitivity and neurohormonal activation in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between baroreflex sensitivity and neurohormonal activation in patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Baroreflex sensitivity, plasma noradrenaline, atrial natriuretic factor, endothelin-1, and plasma renin activity were measured in 37 male patients about 10 days after their first myocardial infarction, and in 15 healthy controls. Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed from the regression line relating the change in RR interval to the change in systolic blood pressure following an intravenous bolus injection of phenylephrine. The measurements were repeated after a follow up of three months.

RESULTS

There was a significant inverse correlation between baroreflex sensitivity and plasma noradrenaline measured before hospital discharge (r = -0.43, P < 0.01). Patients with increased plasma noradrenaline (> or = 2SD above the mean of the age matched control group) had significantly lower baroreflex sensitivity than patients with normal plasma noradrenaline (8.7 (SD 4.6) v 12.1 (6.1) ms/mm Hg, P < 0.05). The change in baroreflex sensitivity during the follow up showed a significant inverse correlation with the change of plasma noradrenaline (r = -0.450, P < 0.01). Furthermore, when patients with increased plasma noradrenaline before hospital discharge were analysed separately, baroreflex sensitivity at three months in patients in whom plasma noradrenaline had decreased to normal values was significantly higher than in patients in whom plasma noradrenaline had remained increased (14.6 (5.7) v 8.1 (8.1) ms/mm Hg, P < 0.05). On the other hand, baroreflex sensitivity was not related to the levels of plasma atrial natriuretic factor, plasma endothelin-1, or plasma renin activity. Neither was any relationship found between change in baroreflex sensitivity and change in plasma atrial natriuretic factor, endothelin-1, or plasma renin activity during the follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The impairment baroreflex sensitivity after myocardial infarction was associated with increased concentration of plasma noradrenaline, that is, sympathetic activation, but not with plasma atrial natriuretic factor, endothelin-1, or plasma renin activity. Baroreflex sensitivity provides information about cardiac vagal control as well as about the balance of cardiac sympathetic-parasympathetic regulation.

Early and late angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in acute myocardial infarction

Studies in animals and humans have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors can prevent or at least attenuate ventricular dilation and remodeling following acute myocardial infarction (MI) and can improve subsequent left ventricular dysfunction, a strong predictor of survival. The question as to which patients will benefit most from ACE inhibitor therapy and the optimal timing of administration of such intervention after the onset of symptoms is still matter of debate, even if it is hypothesized that a greater benefit in terms of remodeling prevention may occur after early administration. However, while it is currently accepted that patients with asymptomatic postinfarctual left ventricular dysfunction can benefit from long-term administration of an ACE inhibitor when therapy is started late, the usefulness of an early administration is still to be clarified. In this setting, the question of early versus late ACE inhibitor treatment has to be related to the different evolving pattern of myocardial infarction with regard to the different degrees of postinfarction ventricular dysfunction and neurohormonal activation, whose extent could influence the effect of ACE inhibition. For example, not all patients with acute MI show progressive ventricular dilation. Early dilation is frequent in patients with anterior localization of necrosis, whereas it is usually not relevant in patients with acute inferior MI. Thus, different postinfarction patterns may differently influence the clinical success of therapeutic interventions, which can be instituted at various stages following acute MI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cardiopulmonary receptor and arterial baroreceptor reflexes after acute myocardial infarction

The baroreceptor-heart rate reflex in human is impaired 2 days after a myocardial infarction but it improves 10 days after the acute coronary event. This study investigated whether (1) the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex improvement takes the reflex back to normal, and (2) the cardiopulmonary reflex is affected by myocardial infarction. In subjects studied 8 to 11 days after a transmural anterior or inferior myocardial infarction the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex sensitivity (slope of the linear regression between negative neck chamber pressures and lengthenings in RR interval) was similar to that seen in control subjects (-6.2 +/- 0.8 vs -6.0 +/- 0.6 ms/mm Hg, mean +/- SEM) and did not change when reassessed 10 days later. In contrast, the cardiopulmonary reflex sensitivity (changes in forearm vascular resistance induced by changing central venous pressure through nonhypotensive lower body suction and leg raising) was markedly less in subjects studied 8 to 11 days after myocardial infarction than in control subjects; the reduction amounted to 58.1 +/- 8% (p less than 0.01). The cardiopulmonary reflex sensitivity greatly improved when reassessed 28 to 45 days later. Thus, the baroreflex is normal about 10 days after myocardial infarction. This condition markedly impairs the cardiopulmonary reflex, but the impairment is also transient.

Early intervention with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors during thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of captopril and thrombolysis study. CATS investigators group

The adjunctive use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with thrombolytic therapy early during acute myocardial infarction offers theoretic advantages. In the acute phase, captopril may scavenge free radicals, blunt the catecholamine response, elicit coronary vasodilation, and increase prostacyclin and bradykinin levels. In the chronic phase, ventricular remodeling may be attenuated. At present, a large number of controlled clinical trials mainly focusing on the effects of ACE inhibition in the chronic phase are underway. Only a few studies concentrate on the effect of acute intervention with ACE inhibitors in ischemia-reperfusion, i.e., thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. In April 1990 under auspices of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, a large nationwide acute intervention trial with captopril in 280 patients receiving thrombolytic therapy was started, the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study (CATS). The primary hypothesis of CATS supposes a very early effect of ACE inhibition on evolving myocardial damage due to ischemia and the consequences of early reperfusion. This will be evaluated by serial echocardiography, Holter monitoring and neurohumoral measurements immediately on thrombolysis and during the first year after myocardial infarction.

Activation of neurohumoral systems following acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have indicated that patients with an acute myocardial infarction have marked activation of all neurohumoral systems on admission to the hospital. This activation begins to subside within the first 72 hours so that by 7-10 days, all plasma neurohormones have returned to normal. The only documented exceptions were found to occur in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and overt heart failure, where both plasma renin activity and atrial natriuretic peptide were increased, and in patients with left ventricular dysfunction but no overt heart failure, where only atrial natriuretic peptide was increased. Although these studies suggest that neurohumoral activation rarely occurs at the time of hospital discharge, they were small and may have missed an important subgroup of patients with persistent neurohumoral activation. In the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, 522 patients had plasma neurohumoral levels measured at a mean of 12 days postinfarction. All SAVE patients had left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 40%), but no overt heart failure. In this group of patients, all neurohumoral levels (plasma renin activity, norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and atrial natriuretic peptide) were found to be increased compared with age-matched control subjects. These results indicate that, in fact, a subgroup of patients without overt heart failure has persistent neurohumoral activation at the time of hospital discharge postinfarction, and that this activation involves several neurohumoral systems. Since patients with persistent neurohumoral activation postinfarction are likely those most at risk of developing complications and the ones most likely to benefit from pharmacologic interventions blunting the effects of neurohumoral activation, measurement of predischarge neurohumoral levels may be useful.

Neuroendocrine changes post myocardial infarction: effects of xamoterol

This study reports the effects of the new beta 1 adrenoceptor partial agonist, xamoterol, on neuroendocrine activity after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Fifty-one consecutive patients with AMI were randomized to treatment with xamoterol, 200 mg twice a day, or placebo; patients were also stratified as to whether or not diuretic therapy was given for left ventricular dysfunction. Noradrenaline, plasma renin activity (PRA), and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) were measured over a 10-day period. Noradrenaline concentrations are higher (p less than 0.05) in patients treated with diuretics at the time of admission and fell over the subsequent 10 days (p less than 0.01). Treatment with xamoterol did not affect this noradrenaline response to myocardial infarction. PRA was also significantly higher in the patients treated with diuretics, and there was a nonsignificant trend for xamoterol to blunt the PRA response in these patients. There was no difference in ANF levels between those patients who were treated with diuretics and those who were not; xamoterol did not affect ANF. Thus xamoterol does not further elevate noradrenaline levels as do conventional beta blockers, and it does not activate the renin-angiotensin system as do potent nonselective beta agonists. Furthermore, xamoterol does not increase ANF levels, probably because it is not negatively inotropic. We conclude that xamoterol does not cause deleterious neuroendocrine changes in patients with AMI even in those treated for heart failure.

Neuroendocrine activation in acute myocardial infarction

Recent research indicates that neurohormonal responses after myocardial infarction may predict patient outcome, and alteration of this process may change etiologic factors and strengthen positive prognosticators. Because there are clinical similarities between acute myocardial infarction and heart failure, there appears to be justification for a unified treatment approach (i.e., therapies that have proved beneficial in the treatment of myocardial infarction have also showed promise in the treatment of heart failure). Conversely, some therapies that have benefited the patient with heart failure may benefit the patient who has had a myocardial infarction. For example, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been proven to blunt detrimental neurohormonal activity seen after myocardial infarction. These therapies promise to reduce complications and improve survival.

Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction

Neuroendocrine response after acute myocardial infarction (MI) results in activation of the sympathetic nervous system, the renin-angiotensin system, and vasopressin and atrial natriuretic peptide release. The net effect of this response is vasoconstriction, cardiac stimulation and regional flow redistribution that may have a favorable effect in some situations and a deleterious effect in others. The possible adverse effects of vasoconstriction were studied in a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study that evaluated a 48-hour infusion of sodium nitroprusside in the setting of acute MI. In the presence of mild, probably primarily diastolic left ventricular dysfunction, nitroprusside appeared to have an adverse effect on long-term survival. However, in the presence of more severe, probably predominantly systolic dysfunction, nitroprusside had a favorable effect on the prognosis. Therefore, the decision of whether to accept or inhibit neuroendocrine activation in acute MI probably depends on the severity of the disease and the timing of the therapeutic intervals.

Hyperglycemia and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients without diabetes mellitus

The present study assessed the prognostic value of hyperglycemia--a common feature in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)--in 330 nondiabetic patients. Seventy-nine known diabetics and 10 (3%) unknown diabetics--diagnosed before discharge by stable glycosylated hemoglobin greater than 6.9% and by oral glucose tolerance testing--were excluded. Thirty-three (10%) patients died. The mortality rate was higher in women, in patients with anterior AMI, in older patients (greater than 65 years) and in the presence of heart failure. It was highest in patients with cardiogenic shock (24/36 vs 9/294; p less than 0.0001). Admission plasma glucose was significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (163 +/- 60 vs 114 +/- 36 mg/dl; p less than 0.0001). Mortality rate increased with increasing admission plasma glucose: 3% in normoglycemic patients (less than or equal to 120 mg/dl) versus 15% in patients with borderline plasma glucose (121 to 180 mg/dl) versus 43% in hyperglycemic patients (greater than 180 mg/dl) (p less than 0.0001). Multiple regression (stepwise) analysis identified cardiogenic shock, infarct site and age as the major determinants of mortality, while admission plasma glucose failed to reach full statistical significance (p = 0.067). Hyperglycemia was related to all 3 of these independent prognostic factors; when age and infarct site were accounted for, hyperglycemia was significantly associated with heart failure only and this association was characterized by a remarkable mortality rate. In nondiabetic patients with AMI, hyperglycemia is a correlate of heart failure and, therefore, an important factor of prognosis.

Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction

The extent of neuroendocrine activation, its time course, and relation to left ventricular dysfunction and arrhythmias were investigated in 78 consecutive patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. High concentrations of arginine vasopressin were found within six hours of symptoms, even in the absence of myocardial infarction (n = 18). Plasma catecholamine concentrations also were highest on admission, whereas renin and angiotensin II concentrations rose progressively over the first three days, not only in those with heart failure but also in patients with no clinical complications. Heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, and deaths were associated with extensive myocardial infarction, low left ventricular ejection fraction, and persistently high concentrations of catecholamines, renin, and angiotensin II up to 10 days after admission, whereas in uncomplicated cases concentrations had already returned to normal.

Neuroendocrine changes in acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction is associated with complex neuroendocrine changes, including release of arginine vasopressin, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, and activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Arginine vasopressin levels are maximal on admission, and subsequently fall even in patients in whom left ventricular failure develops. Plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine are at their highest on admission and return to the normal range in patients with uncomplicated infarction, but they remain significantly elevated in patients in whom left ventricular failure or late ventricular arrhythmias develop. In contrast to catecholamines and arginine vasopressin, plasma renin and angiotensin levels are within normal limits on admission in patients without complications but increase by the third day. Patients with left ventricular failure already have increased plasma levels of renin and angiotensin on admission, but further marked and persistent increases occur over the following days. All of the aforementioned hormones may interact to cause systemic or coronary vasoconstriction, which may have short-term adverse hemodynamic consequences. Furthermore, increased afterload may result in infarct expansion and left ventricular dilatation, which will impair left ventricular function still further. Interruption of the cycle of vasoconstriction and worsening left ventricular failure by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may reduce the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction.