Real-time detection of insulin-like growth factor-1 stimulation of the MAC-T bovine mammary epithelial cell line

Characterization of an epithelial cell line from bovine mammary gland

Elucidation of the bovine mammary gland's unique characteristics depends on obtaining an authentic cell line that will reproduce its function in vitro. Representative clones from bovine mammary cell populations, differing in their attachment capabilities, were cultured. L-1 cells showed strong attachment to the plate, whereas H-7 cells detached easily. Cultures established from these clones were nontumorigenic upon transplantation to an immunodeficient host; they exhibited the epithelial cell characteristics of positive cytokeratin but not smooth muscle actin staining. Both cell lines depended on fetal calf serum for proliferation. They exhibited distinct levels of differentiation on Matrigel in serum-free, insulin-supplemented medium on the basis of their organization and beta-lactoglobulin (BLG) secretion. H-7 cells organized into mammospheres, whereas L-1 cells arrested in a duct-like morphology. In both cell lines, prolactin activated phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription, Stat5-a regulator of milk protein gene transcription, and of PHAS-I-an inhibitor of translation initiation in its nonphosphorylated form. De novo synthesis and secretion of BLG were detected in differentiated cultures: in L-1 cells, BLG was dependent on lactogenic hormones for maximal induction but was less stringently controlled than was beta-casein in the mouse CID-9 cell line. L-1 cells also encompassed a near-diploid chromosomal karyotype and may serve as a tool for studying functional characteristics of the bovine mammary gland.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 regulation of IGF-I is altered in an acidic extracellular environment

While extracellular acidification within solid tumors is well-documented, how reduced pH impacts regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has not been studied extensively. Because IGF-I receptor binding is affected by IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), we examined how pH impacted IGFBP-3 regulation of IGF-I. IGF-I binding in the absence of IGFBP-3 was diminished at reduced pH. Addition of IGFBP-3 reduced IGF-I cell binding at pH 7.4 but increased surface association at pH 5.8. This increase in IGF-I binding at pH 5.8 corresponded with an increase in IGFBP-3 cell association. This, however, was not due to an increase in affinity of IGFBP-3 for heparin at reduced pH although both heparinase III treatment and heparin addition reduced IGFBP-3 enhancement of IGF-I binding. An increase in IGF-I binding to IGFBP-3, though, was seen at reduced pH using a cell-free assay. We hypothesize that the enhanced binding of IGF-I at pH 5.8 is facilitated by increased association of IGFBP-3 at this pH and that the resulting cell associated IGF-I is IGFBP-3 and not IGF-IR bound. Increased internalization and nuclear association of IGF-I at pH 5.8 in the presence of IGFBP-3 was evident, yet cell proliferation was reduced by IGFBP-3 at both pH 5.8 and 7.4 indicating that IGFBP-3-cell associated IGF-I does not signal the cell to proliferate and that the resulting transfer of bound IGF-I from IGF-IR to IGFBP-3 results in diminished proliferation. Solution binding of IGF-I by IGFBP-3 is one means by which IGF-I-induced proliferation is inhibited. Our work suggests that an alternative pathway exists by which IGF-I and IGFBP-3 both associate with the cell surface and that this association inhibits IGF-I-induced proliferation.

IGF-I stimulation of extracellular acidification is not linked to cell proliferation for autocrine cells

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) increases extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), a measure correlated with proliferation for nonautocrine cells. To evaluate the effect of autocrine IGF-I secretion on cell responsiveness, a cell line that secretes IGF-I was tested. SV40-lGF-I cells also registered concentration-dependent increases in ECAR; however, unlike the parental cell line, signal attenuation upon repeat challenges was not evident. Furthermore, SV40-IGF-I cells did not proliferate in response to IGF-I. We investigated if lack of proliferation was due to differences in the protocols of the assays ([3H]thymidine incorporation and microphysiometry). We identified three key differences in the protocols: surface substrate, cell density, and fluid residence time. We found no increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation for cells on either tissue-culture plastic or polycarbonate transwells. Control levels of [3H]thymidine incorporation were cell-density-dependent, but IGF-I did not increase proliferation at any density studied. Finally, we investigated IGF-I stimulation for cells under microphysiometer flow conditions and found no proliferative response to IGF-I. We found that the cells do respond to IGF-I with increased amino acid uptake. These data suggest that IGF-I signaling is operational in the SV40-IGF-I cells, but the transduction pathway for IGF-I-induced proliferation is compromised, despite the fact that these cells respond to fetal bovine serum with increased growth. Ongoing studies are focused on identifying which elements in the signaling cascade are altered by autocrine secretion of IGF-I.