TIPS Is Not Associated with a Higher Risk of Developing HCC in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Is Associated With Better Waitlist Management of Liver Transplant Candidates With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) reduces portal hypertension complications. Its impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We evaluated 42,843 liver transplant candidates with HCC from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2002-2022). 4,484 patients with and without TIPS were propensity score-matched 1:3. Analysing wait-list changes in total tumor volume, HCC count, and alpha-fetoprotein levels, and assessing survival from listing and transplantation; TIPS correlated with a decreased nodule count (-0.24 vs. 0.04, p = 0.028) over a median wait period of 284 days (IQR 195-493) and better overall survival from listing (95.6% vs. 91.5% at 1 year, p < 0.0001). It was not associated with changes in tumor volume (0.28 vs. 0.11 cm³/month, p = 0.58) and AFP (14.37 vs. 20.67 ng/mL, p = 0.42). Post-transplant survival rates (91.8% vs. 91.7% at 1 year, p = 0.25) and HCC recurrence (5.1% vs. 5.9% at 5 years, p = 0.14) were similar, with a median follow-up of 4.98 years (IQR 2.5-8.08). While TIPS was associated with a reduced nodule count and improved waitlist survival, it did not significantly impact HCC growth or aggressiveness. These findings suggest potential benefits of TIPS in HCC management, but further studies need to confirm TIPS safety.

Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the Liver Transplant Setting

Liver transplantation is currently the only curative therapy for patients with liver cirrhosis. Not all patients in the natural course of the disease will undergo transplantation, but the majority of them will experience portal hypertension and its complications. In addition to medical and endoscopic therapy, a key role in managing these complications is played by the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Some indications for TIPS placement are well-established, and they are expanding and broadening over time. This review aims to describe the role of TIPS in managing patients with liver cirrhosis, in light of liver transplantation. As far as it is known, TIPS placement seems not to affect the surgical aspects of liver transplantation, in terms of intraoperative bleeding rates, postoperative complications, or length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit. However, the placement of a TIPS "towards transplant" can offer advantages in terms of ameliorating a patient's clinical condition at the time of transplantation and improving patient survival. Additionally, the TIPS procedure can help preserve the technical feasibility of the transplant itself. In this context, indications for TIPS placement at an earlier stage are drawing particular attention. However, TIPS insertion in decompensated patients can also lead to serious adverse events. For these reasons, further studies are needed to make reliable recommendations for TIPS in the pre-transplant setting.

Risks and benefits of TIPS in HCC and other liver malignancies: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-validated treatment option for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in the context of liver cirrhosis. Its high efficacy and safety in the management of treatment-refractory ascites and variceal bleeding have been extensively proven. Contraindications for TIPS include severe right heart failure, hepatic encephalopathy, and sepsis. However, the role of liver malignancy in TIPS is debatable. Mostly, primary liver malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) emerge from advanced liver diseases. Coexisting portal hypertension in HCC often results in limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Previous studies have shown that TIPS implantation in patients with HCC is technically feasible and is usually not associated with major adverse events. Furthermore, TIPS may help in bridging the time to liver transplantation in early HCC and allow for locoregional treatment in advanced HCC. However, several studies suggest that seeding tumour cells to the lungs by TIPS placement might worsen the prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

TIPS placement in patients with coexisting liver malignancy remains a case-by-case decision, and there is no profound evidence allowing general recommendations. This review aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview of the potential risks and benefits of TIPS placement in patients with liver malignancies.

The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in Treating Portal Hypertension in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver cancer is very frequent, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the majority of liver cancer cases. Its growing incidence has been greatly affected by the increasing prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The latter is a new epidemic in our era. In fact, HCC is often generated from noncirrhotic liver and its treatment benefits from surgical and nonsurgical approaches, potentially bridged by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) use. TIPS use is an effective treatment for portal hypertension complications, but its application in patients with HCC and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) remains controversial due to concerns about tumor rupture, dissemination, and increased toxicity. The technical feasibility and safety of TIPS use in HCC patients have been evaluated in several studies. Despite concerns about intraprocedural complications, retrospective studies have shown high success rates and low complication rates in TIPS placement for HCC patients. TIPS use in combination with locoregional treatments, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE), has been explored as a treatment option for HCC patients with portal hypertension. These studies have shown improved survival rates in patients undergoing TIPS in combination with locoregional treatments. However, the efficacy and toxicity of TACE in combination with TIPS use require careful evaluation, as changes in venous and arterial flow can affect treatment outcomes and complications. The results from studies evaluating the impact of TIPS on systemic therapy and surgical options are also promising. In conclusion, the TIPS is a sufficiently safe, useful item available for physicians treating complications of portal hypertension. Moreover, a TIPS can be used in combination with locoregional therapy in HCC patients. Systemic chemotherapy can also benefit of the use of TIPS placement. A complex interplay affects TIPS use with surgery. The latter needs further data. The TIPS is a useful and safe add-on treatment, changing the natural course of HCC progression. Its use is regulated by a sophisticated physiologic and pathophysiologic flow of evidence.

Liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma: is TIPS deleterious? A multicentric retrospective study of the ARCHET research group with propensity score matching

PURPOSE

A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) before the liver transplantation (LT) has been considered a contraindication in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because of the risk of tumour growth. We aimed to assess the impact of TIPS on incidental HCC and oncological outcomes in transplanted patients with pre-existing HCC.

METHODS

All consecutive transplanted patients for cirrhosis who had a previous TIPS with or without HCC were included. Between 2007 and 2014, 1912 patients were transplanted. We included 122 (6.3%) patients having TIPS before LT. A 1:3 matched cohort of 366 patients (18.9%) having LT without previous TIPS was selected using a propensity score. Incidental HCC rate and risk factor of HCC recurrence were evaluated using multivariate analysis with a competing risk model.

RESULTS

Before LT, in the TIPS group, 27 (22.1%) had an HCC vs. 81 (22.1%) in the control group (p = 1). The incidental HCC rate was similar: 10.5% (10/95) in the TIPS group vs. 6.3% (18/285) in the control group (p = 0.17). Recurrence occurred in 1/27 (3.7%) patient in the TIPS group and in 7/81 (8.6%) patients in the control group, without significant difference (p = 0.51). After multivariate regression, patient's gender (p < 0.01) was significantly associated with HCC recurrence while a tumour within Milan criteria (p = 0.01, sHR: 0.17 [0.04; 0.7]) and an incidental HCC (p<0.01) were found to be protector factors against HCC recurrence.

CONCLUSION

TIPS did not worsen the prognosis of transplanted patients for HCC. TIPS should no longer be contraindicated for oncological reasons in patients with HCC waiting for an LT.

Risk Factors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Historical Perspective

Content available: Author Audio Recording.

Feasibility and clinical value of TIPS combined with subsequent antitumor treatment in HCC patients with refractory ascites

Background

Currently, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with refractory ascites (RA) have a very poor prognosis, and there are no effective treatments recommended by the guidelines. A treatment strategy that utilizes a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with subsequent antitumor treatment is explored in this study for its feasibility and clinical value.

Methods

One month after TIPS, the ascites grade and Child-Pugh scores and stages were reassessed to compare changes in the preoperative indicators.

Results

A total of 68 patients from 3 centers were enrolled. After TIPS, the following results were obtained: a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or absent RA response (AR) of 38 [55.9%], 21 [30.9%], and 9 [13.2%], respectively. The control of RA was 86.8%. The median Child–Pugh scores prior to TIPS and one month after TIPS were 8 (IQR 7–9) and 7 (IQR 6–8), respectively. The down, unchanged, and elevated Child–Pugh stages were 26 [38.2%], 36 [53.0%], and 6 [8.8%], respectively. The postoperative Child–Pugh scores were significantly lower than the preoperative (p < 0.001). 92.6% (63/61) of the patients received subsequent anti-tumor treatment opportunities. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 (range, 0.4–49.6) months. The lower postoperative Child-Pugh stage(p = 0.001), downward change of the Child-Pugh stage(p = 0.027), and downward change of the Child-Pugh score (p = 0.002) were independent protected prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion

As a minimally invasive method, TIPS can effectively control ascites and improve Child–Pugh scores and stages. TIPS combined with subsequent anti-tumor therapy is a feasible and effective management for HCC patients with RA.