The role of oral appliances in treating obstructive sleep apnea

Multilevel Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Extended Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term effectiveness of multilevel (tongue and palate) temperature-controlled radiofrequency tissue ablation (TCRFTA) for patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, 2-institution case series. Twenty-nine subjects with mild to moderate OSAS and who were at least 1 year from completion of multilevel TCRFTA were included, representing a subset of subjects who were enrolled in a previously published controlled trial. Exclusion criteria for this extended follow-up study included any additional treatment for OSAS after completion of TCRFTA.

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 23 months. Daytime sleepiness and OSAS-related quality of life were significantly improved at extended follow-up (both P 0.001). Median reaction time testing and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were also significantly improved at long-term follow-up ( P = 0.03 and 0.01). Body mass index was unchanged ( P = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel TCRFTA treatment of mild to moderate OSAS resulted in prolonged improvement in daytime somnolence, OSAS-related quality of life, psychomotor vigilance, and AHI in this group of subjects at extended follow-up.

Impact of upper airway abnormalities on the success and adherence to mandibular advancement device treatment in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Introduction

The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is a option to treat patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

Objective

To assess the influence of upper airway abnormalities on the success of and adherence to MAD in patients with OSAS.

Methods

Prospective study with 30 patients with mild to moderate OSAS and indications for MAD. The protocol included questionnaires addressing sleep and nasal complaints, polysomnography, and upper airway assessment. The analyzed parameters of patients who showed therapeutic success and failure and those who exhibited good and poor treatment adherence were compared.

Results

28 patients completed the protocol; 64.3% responded successfully to treatment with MAD, and 60.7% exhibited good adherence to treatment. Factors associated with greater success rates were younger age (p = 0.02), smaller cervical circumference (p = 0.05), and lower AHI at baseline (p = 0.05). There was a predominance of patients without nasal abnormalities among patients treated successfully compared to those with treatment failure (p = 0.04), which was not observed in relation to adherence. Neither pharyngeal nor facial skeletal abnormalities were significantly associated with either therapeutic success or adherence.

Conclusion

MAD treatment success was significantly lower among patients with nasal abnormalities; however, treatment adherence was not influenced by the presence of upper airway or facial skeletal abnormalities.

Intra- and interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of malocclusion in sleep-disordered breathing

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is often related to malocclusion, and dentists should be able to recognize occlusal changes that may be associated with the development, onset, or persistence of SDB. Although clinical examination is routinely used by specialists in orthodontics and functional jaw orthopedics, differences in diagnosis are very common. Method : Two observers, both dentists specializing in functional jaw orthopedics, examined 56 children aged 7 to 9 years. Intra- and interobserver agreement in identification of functional orthopedic and orthodontic conditions were assessed. Results : Intraobserver agreement was strong for all variables. Interobserver agreement was also strong, except for the variable overbite, which showed good agreement. Conclusion : Diagnostic criteria provide an opportunity for dentists to recognize dental malocclusions that may be associated with sleep-disordered breathing.

Obesity prevention and intervention in dental practice

Dentists have an important role in preventing and detecting oral and systemic diseases because of their diagnostic and screening abilities and the frequency of patient visits. These skills and practice paradigms should be considered in solving the obesity epidemic. The well-described connection between periodontal disease and diabetes is a reason for dentists to intervene in the rise of obesity. Dentists are in a unique position to identify and aid in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a condition associated with obesity and diabetes. Dentists can play a role in raising awareness of overweight status and obesity risk behaviors in children.

[Tongue fixation system for therapy of sleeping disorders. A feasibility study]

INTRODUCTION

Forward displacement of the tongue is a verified principle in the therapy of sleep disorders which prevents the tongue from sinking backwards thus avoiding obstruction of the upper respiratory tract during sleep. In this feasibility study a novel oral appliance which connects to a pin implanted within the tongue was investigated.

METHODS

A new tongue positioning system using previously implanted tongue piercings as a pivot was developed. By pulling the tongue forward the oral device prevents airway obstruction. In our study we fitted 10 subjects who already had the tongue pierced with the developed oral device. The subjects underwent two nights of polysomnography with and without using the tongue positioning system. Wearing comfort and side effects were evaluated using a questionnaire. Moderate alcohol consumption was used to provoke snoring or apnea in the subjects. Tongue positioning with and without the device was visualized with oropharyngeal MRI.

RESULTS

Subjects did not report any discomfort or side effects wearing the device. Subjects showed only moderate snoring or apnea after alcohol consumption and snoring after alcohol consumption was reduced with the device. The average apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) was 0.8/h without the device. Using the device led to an increase of apnea in the subjects. MRI visualization showed that the device did not keep the upper airway space opened by fixing the tongue.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of the tongue positioning system should be improved by a modification which should be investigated in patients with preexisting sleep disorders.

An evaluation of a titration strategy for prescription of oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Oral appliances (OAs) are first-line therapy for mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and are being used with increasing frequency. Additionally, best practice of OA titration is unknown. We describe the experience of patients treated with an OA, identify factors that predict treatment success with an OA, and offer a protocol for OA titration.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients seen in a dental sleep clinic between 2002 and 2006. Patients selected for OA treatment underwent baseline polysomnography, were individually fit with an OA, and were instructed to titrate it at home until symptom resolution or discomfort. During follow-up polysomnography, additional titration was performed as needed. Primary outcome was successful treatment, defined as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) <10 events per hour and AHI decrease at least 50% from baseline. Logistic regression models were created to identify associations between patient characteristics and successful treatment. Overall differences in AHI at baseline, after home titration, and after final titration were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, and post hoc comparisons were performed with sign tests, with Bonferroni corrections.

RESULTS

Of 57 subjects treated with an OA, 37 subjects (64.9%) were successfully treated with OA therapy. Of the 49 subjects for whom data were available for AHI after home titration, 27 subjects (55%) achieved successful treatment of OSA by self-titration, without need for further titration during follow-up polysomnography.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of subjects, regardless of OSA severity, are successfully treated with an OA. Men and younger patients were found to be the best responders. The titration protocol for an OA offers a beneficial initial step in the treatment of OSA.

Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep-disordered breathing

Between 1982 and 2006, there were 89 distinct publications dealing with oral appliance therapy involving a total of 3,027 patients, which reported results of sleep studies performed with and without the appliance. These studies, which constitute a very heterogeneous group in terms of methodology and patient population, are reviewed and the results summarized. This review focused on the following outcomes: sleep apnea (i.e. reduction in the apnea/hypopnea index or respiratory disturbance index), ability of oral appliances to reduce snoring, effect of oral appliances on daytime function, comparison of oral appliances with other treatments (continuous positive airway pressure and surgery), side effects, dental changes (overbite and overjet), and long-term compliance. We found that the success rate, defined as the ability of the oral appliances to reduce apnea/hypopnea index to less than 10, is 54%. The response rate, defined as at least 50% reduction in the initial apnea/hypopnea index (although it still remained above 10), is 21%. When only the results of randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled studies are considered, the success and response rates are 50% and 14%, respectively. Snoring was reduced by 45%. In the studies comparing oral appliances to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or to uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), an appliance reduced initial AHI by 42%, CPAP reduced it by 75%, and UPPP by 30%. The majority of patients prefer using oral appliance than CPAP. Use of oral appliances improves daytime function somewhat; the Epworth sleepiness score (ESS) dropped from 11.2 to 7.8 in 854 patients. A summary of the follow-up compliance data shows that at 30 months, 56–68% of patients continue to use oral appliance. Side effects are relatively minor but frequent. The most common ones are excessive salivation and teeth discomfort. Efficacy and side effects depend on the type of appliance, degree of protrusion, vertical opening, and other settings. We conclude that oral appliances, although not as effective as CPAP in reducing sleep apnea, snoring, and improving daytime function, have a definite role in the treatment of snoring and sleep apnea.

Sleep and aging: 2. Management of sleep disorders in older people

The treatment of sleep-related illness in older patients must be undertaken with an appreciation of the physiologic changes associated with aging. Insomnia is common among older people. When it occurs secondary to another medical condition, treatment of the underlying disorder is imperative. Benzodiazepines, although potentially effective, must be used with care and in conservative doses. Daytime sedation, a common side effect, may limit use of benzodiazepines. Newer non-benzodiazepine drugs appear to be promising. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder can be treated with clonazepam, levodopa-carbidopa or newer dopaminergic agents such as pramipexole. Sleep hygiene is important to patients with narcolepsy. Excessive daytime sleepiness can be treated with central stimulants; cataplexy may be improved with an antidepressant. Restless legs syndrome and periodic leg-movement disorder are treated with benzodiazepines or dopaminergic agents such as levodopa-carbidopa and, more recently, newer dopamine agonists. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea includes weight reduction and proper sleep positioning (on one's side), but may frequently necessitate the use of a continuous positive air-pressure (CPAP) device. When used regularly, CPAP machines are very effective in reducing daytime fatigue and the sequelae of untreated obstructive sleep apnea.

Development of a questionnaire to assess dentists' knowledge, opinion, education resources, physician cooperation, and clinical practice regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSAQ-D)

This report describes the construction of a questionnaire to assess dentists' knowledge, opinion, education resources, clinical practice, and physician cooperation regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. The scale development included such steps as generating an item pool, expert review of initial item pool, pilot test, and final test. After the expert review, a total of 78 items made up the pilot test instrument including five demographic (age, year graduated from dental school, gender, years in practice dentistry, and membership of the Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine), 22 knowledge, 15 opinion, 11 education resources, 10 physician cooperation, and 15 clinical practice questions. The pilot test samples were third or fourth year dental school students and dentists from the University of Florida. Nineteen dentists and 26 students returned the survey. Based on the results of item analysis and content review, a total of 70 questions were remained for the final test. The final questionnaire was mailed to 450 dentists who were randomly selected from a list of 10,838 dentists with a Florida license and also delivered to 65 dental school students and postgraduates of the University of Florida. A total of 163 participants including 112 dentists and 51 students and postgraduates responded. The average age was 42.87 years, and most of them are males (77.8%). Only one dentist was a current member of the Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine. The item analysis was performed for five scales. 8 items with poor item difficulty, lower item discrimination, or having big effect on the item consistency were removed from the instrument, and 62 questions were kept for the further evaluation. The reliability coefficient alpha of knowledge, opinion, education resources, physician cooperation, and clinical practice scales was 0.77, 0.86, 0.67, 0.75, and 0.86, respectively. According to the standard from DeVellis (Scale development: theory and applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2003), they were acceptable, or respectable, or even very good.

Effect of a non-adjustable oral appliance on upper airway morphology in obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of oral appliance (OA) on upper airway morphology and its relationship with treatment response in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

METHODS

Symptomatic OSA subjects were recruited. Non-adjustable OA was custom made. Variables examined at baseline and while wearing the device at 2 months included polysomnographic data, computed tomographic measurements of upper airway cross sectional area at level of velopharynx (VA) and hypopharynx (HA), upper airway volume, and cephalometric parameters. Treatment outcome was based on post-treatment apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI).

RESULTS

Forty patients were recruited and 23 (7 women) completed the study. They were middle-aged (49, 40-58 years) (median, interquartile range) and overweight (BMI 26, 23.3-29.5 kg/m2), with moderate OSA (AHI 26.4, 14.1-36). The overall post treatment AHI was 8.4 (2.4-12.5), with 14 (61%) patients showing good response (AHI<10), and the other 9 patients showing moderate response (>50% reduction in AHI but still 10). OA decreased the cross-sectional area of the HA (P=0.046), showed a trend of decreasing the ratio of cross-sectional area of the HA to cross-sectional area of the VA (P=0.053) and significantly increased the overall upper airway volume (P=0.006, n=11). No significant relationship between upper airway parameters and treatment outcome was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

OA altered upper airway morphometry towards a profile consistent with decreased propensity to collapse, which may thus have contributed to improvement of OSA.

Effectiveness of multilevel (tongue and palate) radiofrequency tissue ablation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of multilevel (tongue base and palate) temperature controlled radiofrequency tissue ablation (TCRFTA) for patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The secondary objective is to compare multilevel TCRFTA to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study is a controlled case series of one investigator's experience with multilevel TCRFTA for patients with OSAS. Twenty-two subjects with mild to severe OSAS, without tonsil hypertrophy, completed multilevel TCRFTA (mean 4.8 tongue base and 1.8 palate treatment sessions) and had both pre- and posttreatment polysomnography. Primary outcomes included change from baseline in apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), daytime somnolence, and reaction time testing measured 2 to 3 months after TCRFTA. Secondary outcomes included change in other respiratory parameters, OSAS related quality of life, and upper airway size. Comparison of 18 patients treated with TCRFTA for mild to moderate OSAS (AHI > 5 and < or = 40) is made with 11 matched patients treated with nasal CPAP for mild to moderate OSAS.

RESULTS

Multilevel TCRFTA significantly improved AHI (P = .001), apnea index (P = .02), as well as respiratory and total arousal indices (P = .0002 and P = .01). Significant improvement with moderate or large treatment effect sizes were noted for OSAS related quality of life (P = .01) and daytime somnolence (P = .0001), with a trend toward significant improvement in reaction time testing (P = .06), with mean posttreatment normalization of all three outcome measures. Fifty-nine percent of subjects demonstrated at least a 50% reduction in AHI to less than 20. The targeted upper airway, measured in the supine position, demonstrated a trend toward significant improvement in mean cross sectional area (P = .05) and volume (P = .10). Side effects of TCRFTA were infrequent, mild, and self-limited. No significant correlation between pretreatment parameters and outcome improvement was noted. Nasal CPAP resulted in significant improvement in AHI (P = .0004) to near normal levels, with an associated improvement in OSAS related quality of life (P = .02) and a trend toward significant improvement in daytime somnolence (P = .06). Reaction time testing demonstrated no significant improvement (P = .75). No significant differences were seen for change in AHI, OSAS related quality of life, daytime somnolence, or reaction time testing between multilevel TCRFTA and CPAP.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel (tongue base and palate) TCRFTA is a low-morbidity, office-based procedure performed with local anesthesia and is an effective treatment option for patients with OSAS. On average, abnormalities in daytime somnolence, quality of life, and reaction time testing demonstrated improvement from baseline and were normalized after treatment. Polysomnographic respiratory parameters also demonstrated significant improvement with multilevel TCRFTA.