Science is the fuel for the engine of technology and clinical practice

Science-Informed Health Policies for Oral and Systemic Health

Oral, dental and craniofacial (ODC) health has a profound impact on general health and welfare throughout life, yet US dentists and physicians operate across misaligned silos. This protracted division limits access to optimal health, supports fee for services, and exacerbates health disparities. Early in the 20th century, the most frequent dental therapy was tooth extraction: removed infected teeth were substituted by prosthetic appliances - commonly, dentures or nothing. Most adults assumed becoming edentulous was a normal corollary of aging. With the discovery of penicillin and other antibiotics, healthcare professionals and policy makers predicted infectious diseases would become irrelevant. However, given numerous health threats, including SARS-CoV-2, HIV, multidrug-resistant bacteria, Zika virus, Ebola virus, and now monkeypox, public and professional awareness of transmissible infectious diseases has never been more evident. Ironically, little attention has been paid to unmet transmissible, infectious, common oral diseases - dental caries and periodontal diseases. Therefore, these persist within "the silent and invisible epidemic". The preventable death of a young boy in 2007 from an infected untreated tooth that produced bacterial meningitis is a profound reminder that our nation has vast inequities in education, health, and welfare. The impact of oral infections on hospital-acquired pneumonia, post-operative infection in cardiac valve surgery, and even academic performances of disadvantaged children displayed through sociodemographic characteristics and access to care determinants also are profound! This paper asserts that current and emerging ODC health knowledge and science will inform health policies and advance equity in access to care, affordable costs, and optimal healthcare outcomes. We recommend that legal and regulatory systems and public health programs be required to ensure health equity. A fair healthcare system that addresses holistic healthcare must be transparent, accessible, integrated and provide a standard of oral healthcare based upon scientific evidence for all people across the lifespan.

How Research Training Will Shape the Future of Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research

This is a critical time in the history of the dental profession for it to fully embrace the responsibility to safeguard its reputation as a learned profession. In this golden era of scientific and technological advances, opportunities abound to create new diagnostics, preventions, treatments, and cures to improve oral health. Dental schools are the largest national resource entrusted with the responsibility to educate, train, and retain oral health researchers who can leverage such technologies and research opportunities that will benefit the profession at large as well as patients. This article reemphasizes the theme that research training and scholarship must be inextricably woven into the environment and culture in dental schools to ensure the future standing of the profession. An overview of the history of support provided by the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research for the training and career development of dentist-scientists is presented. In addition, new data on the outcomes of such investments are presented along with a comparison with other health professions. This overview underscores the need to expand the capacity of a well-trained cadre of oral health researchers through the reengineering of training programs. Such strategies will best prepare future graduates for team science, clinical trials, and translational research as well as other emerging opportunities. The urgent need for national organizations like the American Dental Association, American Dental Education Association, and American Association for Dental Research to create new alliances and novel initiatives to assist dental schools and universities in fulfilling their research mission is emphasized. To ignore such calls for action is to disavow a valuable legacy inherited by the dental profession. This article was written as part of the project "Advancing Dental Education in the 21^st Century."

Our Essential and Endangered Dentist-Scientist Workforce

Future advances in dental medicine rely on a robust and stable pipeline of dentist-scientists who are dedicated to research inspired by the patients' condition. The biomedical research community faces external and internal pressures that have been building over years. This is now threatening the current and future status of basic, translational and patient-oriented research by dentist-scientists who study dental, oral and craniofacial diseases, population sciences, and prevention. The dental academic, research and practicing communities can no longer ignore the warning signs of a system that is under considerable stress. Here, the authors report findings of the Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group, charged by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director, to perform quantitative and qualitative analyses on dentist-scientists by addressing the size, composition and activities of the group, relative to other health professions. From 1999 to 2012, trends in the numbers of grant applications and awards to dentist-scientists point to an overall decline. Disturbing are the low numbers of new investigators who apply for Early Career NIH Programs. While more seasoned dentist researchers enjoy greater success, the average age of first-time funded dentists is 52.7 y for females and 54.6 y for males, with a relatively low number of applications submitted and funded. These new data led the panel to stress the need to expand the capacity of the dentist-scientist workforce to leverage technologies and research opportunities that benefit the profession at-large. Suggestions were made to invest in developing clinical research faculty, including those with foreign degrees, through new training mechanisms. The creation of new alliances between national organizations like the American Association for Dental Research, the American Dental Education Association and the American Dental Association will undoubtedly lead to bold and concerted actions that must be pursued with a sense of urgency. A more supportive culture within dental schools and universities for dentist-scientists is needed, as their success is critical to the future career choices of their mentees. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Advances in dental medicine rely on a pipeline of dentist-scientists who are dedicated to research inspired by the patients' condition. Despite the recent advancement in technology and innovation, the dental community can no longer ignore the various pressures that threaten the future of the dentist-scientist profession. Here, the authors report findings of the Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group of NIH that were published in 2014, and draw attention to the key issues threatening the NIH-funded pool of dentist-scientists.

A curriculum for the new dental practitioner: preparing dentists for a prospective oral health care environment

The emerging concept of prospective health care would shift the focus of health care from disease management to disease prevention and health management. Dentistry has a unique opportunity to embrace this model of prospective and collaborative care and focus on the management of oral health. Academic dentistry must better prepare future dentists to succeed in this new health care environment by providing them with the scientific and technical knowledge required to understand and assess risk and practice disease prevention. Dental schools must consider creating career pathways for enabling future graduates to assume important leadership roles that will advance a prospective oral health care system.