The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

A novel endoscopic posterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion technique: Feasibility and biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cervical decompression and fusion, the primary surgical techniques for treating degenerative cervical myelopathy, is traditionally performed using interbody fusion through an anterior approach. There are no reported cases of cage placement performed via a posterior cervical approach under endoscopy. This study investigates a novel posterior interbody fusion technique using a newly designed split cage and validates its feasibility through computer simulations.

METHODS

Anatomical parameters of the posterior cervical safe area (PCSA) were analyzed, and a split interbody fusion cage was designed based on the anatomical parameters for endoscopic posterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion (Endo-PCDIF) surgery. Based on a validated intact C3-C7 cervical model, decompression-alone and Endo-PCDIF models were established via simulating operations, and comparisons were conducted among these models regarding the range of motions (ROMs), displacement, and stress distribution under the different motion conditions.

RESULTS

PCSA is surrounded by the dural sac, nerve roots, vertebral artery, and pedicle. Ideal operating space for Endo-PCDIF was achieved by grinding the partial osseous structure. After performing decompression-alone, ROMs at the operational segment increased significantly compared to the pre-operation (80%, 12%, 34%, 24%, 25%, and 10%). Endo-PCDIF reduced ROMs at the operational segment by 49%, 32%, 46%, 42%, 52%, and 39% compared to the decompression-alone. The split cage exhibited minimal displacement and no abnormal stress distribution was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PCSA is a crucial surgical pathway for operation at ventral area of dural sac during posterior cervical endoscopy. Endo-PCDIF effectively maintained stability at the operational segment and reduced the biomechanical influence result in adjacent segments.

Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: Are We Finally There? A Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness Against Non-microscopic Discectomy, Microdiscectomy and Tubular Discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional microdiscectomy (MD), tubular discectomy (MED), and open non-microscopic discectomy (OD) Despite significant technological advancements in endoscopic techniques over the past decade, it is not yet clear whether FELD offers a definitive advantage over traditional methods.

PURPOSE

This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of available publications to assess whether the superiority of endoscopic treatment over traditional open and minimally invasive endoscopic surgical techniques can be more conclusively established. The central question driving this meta-analysis was: Are we finally there?

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Meta-analysis study included adult patients (≥18 years old) with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) without concurrent lumbar spinal stenosis METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials published between 2013 and 2024. The quality of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Included studies reported on at least one of the following outcomes: (1) adverse effects, (2) operative parameters, (3) bed and hospital stay, and (4) clinical indices (postoperative values). Mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare treatment effects between FELD and MD, MED, or OD.

RESULTS

FELD demonstrated several advantages, particularly in short-term pain (within 6 months postoperatively) relief and faster patient (length of bed stay 1-2 days) mobilization, while maintaining comparable risks of recurrence, reoperation, and complications relative to traditional techniques. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the data and a limited number of prospective trials.

CONCLUSIONS

More well-designed, prospective randomized trials are necessary, with a focus on radiological outcomes and comprehensive cost analyses including societal costs. Only through such robust data can we determine whether FELD truly represents a new gold standard for lumbar discectomy. Are we finally there? We are certainly closer, but much remains to be addressed.

Clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) in treating patients with symptomatic cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with single-segment symptomatic CSR treated between January 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into PECD and ACDF groups based on the surgical approach. Patient demographics, operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, complications, postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, neck dysfunction index (NDI), arm and neck visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared and analyzed. The learning curve of the PECD group was assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The PECD group had shorter operative time, smaller incision length, less estimated intraoperative bleeding, lower total hospitalization costs, and shorter postoperative hospital stays compared to the ACDF group (P < 0.05). Postoperative NDI, arm VAS, and neck VAS scores improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups during the same period (P > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the PECD and ACDF groups in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, complications, or surgical success rates (P > 0.05). As more cases accumulated, a trend toward shorter operative times was observed in the PECD group. When grouped according to the learning curve, with the 23rd case as the cutoff point, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the learning phase and proficient phase groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PECD is a safe and effective procedure for treating single-segment CSR, offering clinical outcomes comparable to ACDF. PECD has a notable learning curve, requiring beginners to perform 23 cases to reach proficiency. However, longer operative times do not negatively impact preclinical outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (EELF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a prospective observational study

Lumbar foraminal stenosis can be surgically treated by foraminal decompression or facet joint resection and fusion (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, TLIF). While conventional foraminal decompression poses a risk of segmental instability, the endoscopic approach (extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy, EELF) resects only the ventral part of the facet joint with a horizontal surgical trajectory. A prospective observational study was performed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of EELF versus TLIF. Patients with dominant unilateral radicular pain from lumbar foraminal stenosis at or above L4-5, without severe central stenosis or instability, were included from January 2021 to February 2023. EELF involved sufficient foraminal widening using a reamer, followed by an endoscopic procedure. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain at postoperative 12 months. Among 26 patients in each group, the primary analysis included 23 EELF patients (mean age: 72 ± 8 years) and 22 TLIF patients (mean age: 70 ± 8 years). EELF was significantly more cost-effective (EELF: $15,536.0 ± 4,190.0/QALY vs. TLIF: $32,869.4 ± 5,429.3/QALY, p < .001) and demonstrated shorter operating times, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay (p < .05), with no significant difference in clinical outcomes. Thus, EELF could be a cost-effective and less invasive alternative for treating lumbar foraminal stenosis.

What is the learning curve for endoscopic spine surgery? A comprehensive systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) is rapidly emerging as a viable minimally invasive technique to successfully treat symptomatic degenerative spinal conditions. Widespread adoption has been limited in part due to the learning curve.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the learning curve for uniportal and biportal ESS and compare the 2 techniques.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines.

PATIENT SAMPLE

About 29 studies were included with 18 studies investigating uniportal learning curves and 11 biportal studies. There were 1,493 patients across all uniportal studies. There was a total of 1,005 patients across all biportal studies.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of patients, technique type, patient reported outcomes, complications, operative time before the learning curve threshold, operative time after learning curve threshold, number of cases required to meet threshold, number of surgeons in the study, and cases per surgeon were collected and analyzed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Medline, and Embase from 2000 to present date. Data was extracted by 3 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

The learning curve studies were reviewed and summarized. The overall median number of cases to reach the learning curve threshold was significantly less in uniportal vs biportal studies (20 vs. 37.5, p=.0463). When stratifying by various procedures, there was no significant difference between the techniques with number of cases required or improvement of operative time. Operative time for biportal discectomies decreased by a significantly greater amount vs uniportal. (44.5% vs. 21.4%, p=.0332).

CONCLUSIONS

The learning curve literature for ESS was systematically reviewed and ways to overcome the learning curve were discussed. The overall median number of cases for the learning curve was significantly fewer in uniportal vs biportal but the improvement in operative time was significantly greater with biportal discectomies, typically the entry level procedure by novice surgeons. Overcoming the learning curve for ESS is a critical factor to widespread adoption and understanding it may aid surgeons in progressing to proficiency while mitigating the risk of complications.

Full-Endoscopic Sacroiliac Joint Denervation for Painful Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Prospective 2-Year Clinical Outcomes and Predictors for Improved Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Full-endoscopic sacroiliac joint denervation (FE-SJD) is a novel technique for the management of pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, and outcome predictors of uniportal full-endoscopic sacroiliac joint denervation.

METHODS

From 2019 to 2021, a total of 47 consecutive patients with pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction underwent uniportal FE-SJD through posterior approach by a single fellowship-trained spine surgeon. A retrospective analysis of perioperative parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes were obtained prospectively.

RESULTS

The patient cohort had a mean age of 59.4 ± 14.0 years, with 63.8% females. Symptom duration averaged 62.1 ± 53.7 months. The mean operative time was 57.1 ± 16.8 minutes. All patients were discharged on the same day of surgery. Significant improvement was noted in preoperative visual analog score (back) and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 3, 6, 12 months, and 2 years ( P < .001). Thirty-four patients (72.3%) returned to normal functioning with an average of 82% pain relief and a satisfaction rate of 78.7% at a mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 13.1 months. There were no intraoperative complications. One patient had postoperative right L5 dysesthesia. Seven patients (14.9%) underwent contralateral FE-SJD due to satisfaction with the index procedure but residual pain on the contralateral side. Concomitant lumbar issues correlated with less functional improvement at 2 years ( P = .009).

CONCLUSION

The long-term clinical results of FE-SJD are favorable. Endoscopic denervation of the dorsal rami branches supplying the sacroiliac joint represents a safe, effective, and durable option to address pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A significant factor that influences outcomes is the presence of concomitant lumbar pathology. Further research is needed to compare this technique with current available treatment options.

Less Is More: Evaluating the Benefits of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

This review aims to explore the evolution, techniques, and outcomes of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) within the field of neurosurgery. We sought to address the increasing burden of spine degeneration in a rapidly aging population and the need for optimizing surgical management. This review explores various techniques in MISS, drawing upon evidence from retrospective studies, case series, systematic reviews, and technological advancements in neurosurgical spine treatment. Various approaches, including endonasal cervical, transoral cervical, transcervical, mini-open/percutaneous, tubular, and endoscopic techniques, provide alternatives for current approaches to a range of spinal pathologies. The main findings of this review highlight potential advantages of MISS over traditional open surgery, including reduced complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved patient outcomes. Our research underscores the importance of adopting MISS techniques to optimize patient care in neurosurgical spine treatment.

Comparative Outcomes of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression, Conventional Subtotal Laminectomy, and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Central Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Spinal stenosis is a prevalent condition; however, the optimal surgical treatment for central lumbar stenosis remains controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes and radiological parameters of 3 surgical.

METHODS

unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression with unilateral biportal endoscopy (ULBD-UBE), conventional subtotal laminectomy (STL), and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 86 patients, divided into ULBD-UBE (n=34), STL (n=24), and MIS-TLIF (n=28) groups. We evaluated demographics and perioperative factors and assessed clinical outcomes using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC). Radiological parameters assessed included lumbar lordosis, L4S1 Cobb angle (L4S1), T12S1 Cobb angle (T12S1), increased cross-sectional dural area (CSA), dynamic angulation (DA), dynamic slip (DS), and development of postoperative instability.

RESULTS

The ULBD-UBE group showed a significantly shorter hospital stay duration and operation time and reduced blood loss than the other groups (p<0.001). ULBD-UBE group showed a trend towards greater VAS and ODI improvement at 1 month and postoperative NIC symptom relief. Radiologically, MIS-TLIF group exhibited lower postoperative DA and DS (p<0.001), indicating higher postoperative stability. Postoperative instability was lower in the ULBD-UBE group (2.9%) than in the STL group (16.7%) and similar to the MIS-TLIF group (0.0%) (p=0.028). The CSA was highest in the MIS-TLIF group (295.5%) compared to that in the other groups (ULBD-UBE, 216.3%; STL, 245.2%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to other procedures, ULBD-UBE is a safe, effective, and viable surgical procedure for treating lumbar central stenosis.

Hybrid Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy Using Robotic Arm and Navigation for Highly Migrated Calcified Disc Herniation

This video provides a step-by-step guide for performing the hybrid endoscopic thoracic discectomy using navigation and robotic arm for addressing high migrated calcified disc herniation. With the development of techniques, endoscopic spine surgery has emerged as a reliable treatment for thoracic myelopathy. This approach offers high-resolution, off-axis visualization of the surgical field. The field is poised to advance further as endoscopic instruments are refined, becoming less invasive and more precise through the integration of navigation and robot-assisted systems. A 62-year-old woman presented to us with chief complaints of both legs weakness. She had difficulty standing and walking after squatted due to weakness in her legs and her Oswestry Disability Index score was 66. On examination her both side knee extension and ankle dorsiflexion were grade 4 without dysesthesia. The imaging examination confirmed the diagnosis of thoracic myelopathy caused by a highly migrated calcified disc herniation at T5-6 level. The patient underwent an endoscopic thoracic discectomy using robotic arm and navigation for addressing highly migrated calcified disc herniation, resulting in an excellent outcome. The continuous development of navigation and robotic systems in endoscopic thoracic surgery enhanced accuracy in surgical incisions and instrument placement, as well as improved efficiency in locating pathology and achieving precise decompression. Endoscopic thoracic discectomy combines full-endoscopy and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) techniques to leverage the benefits of both approaches, including the cross-viewing of full-endoscopy cannula and the use of larger Kerrison rongeurs under UBE.

Attitudes regarding barriers to entry and the learning curve associated with endoscopic decompression-only surgery: an international survey

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Endoscopic spine decompression surgery (ESDS) offers numerous benefits, including reduced tissue damage, smaller incisions, shorter recovery times, and a lower risk of complications. However, its adoption among spine surgeons in the United States has been slow. The reluctance to adopt ESDS can be attributed to factors such as the learning curve, cost of equipment and training, and limited access to necessary resources.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study is to assess attitudes toward barriers to and reasons for not adopting ESDS. A secondary objective is to further identify the learning curves, challenges, and common concerns of surgeons considering ESDS adoption.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

An international survey of fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS).

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 171 fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery voluntarily and anonymously responded to our survey via the RedCap platform. Surgeons were located across the globe, representing six regions.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data on current region of practice, specialty training, time in practice, practice type, and surgical volume was obtained for each surgeon who responded to the survey. Additionally, we obtained data on perceived benefits, barriers to entry, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, with questions focusing on perceived benefits, barriers to adoption, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 171 surgeons responded to the survey, representing six regions: North America (48.0%), Asia Pacific (28.7%), and Europe (11.7%). Respondents were trained in Orthopaedic Surgery (59.1%) and Neurological Surgery (35.7%). Experience varied, with 35.9% having over 20 years in practice. Most respondents were in Private Practice (59.6%) or Academic/University settings (39.2%), with the majority practicing in urban areas (67.8%). Surgeons were categorized into the EG (50.3%) who used endoscopic techniques and the NEG (49.7%) who did not. There were no significant differences in training types or work settings between the groups. For the NEG, 23.5% were exposed to endoscopic techniques during training, and 50.6% received specific training in practice, mainly through formal industry courses (76.7%). The primary barriers to adopting ESDS were lack of training (55.3%), unavailability of equipment (50.6%), and financial concerns. EG surgeons cited minimizing tissue trauma, improved access to foraminal pathology, and minimizing recovery time as critical factors for using ESDS. Challenges included concerns for incomplete decompression and the duration of surgery, with significant variation in perceived difficulty during the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

Despite the recognized benefits of ESDS, barriers such as training deficiencies and equipment costs hinder its widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through enhanced training opportunities and hospital system support could increase the adoption of ESDS, benefiting both surgeons and patients by reducing recovery times and complications.

The evolution and integration of technology in spinal neurosurgery: A scoping review

Spinal disorders pose a significant global health challenge, affecting nearly 5% of the population and incurring substantial socioeconomic costs. Over time, spinal neurosurgery has evolved from basic 19th-century techniques to today's minimally invasive procedures. The recent integration of technologies such as robotic assistance and advanced imaging has not only improved precision but also reshaped treatment paradigms. This review explores key innovations in imaging, biomaterials, and emerging fields such as AI, examining how they address long-standing challenges in spinal care, including enhancing surgical accuracy and promoting tissue regeneration. Are we at the threshold of a new era in healthcare technology, or are these innovations merely enhancements that may not fundamentally advance clinical care? We aim to answer this question by offering a concise introduction to each technology and discussing in depth its status and challenges, providing readers with a clearer understanding of its actual potential to revolutionize surgical practices.

Enhancing Cadaver Labs for Endoscopic Spine Surgery: The Glove as the "Lesion"

OBJECTIVE

We describe a novel yet simple training exercise for residents who are being introduced to endoscopic spine surgery.

METHODS

Prior to residents training on the endoscopic interlaminar approach, the course faculty performed an endoscopic transforaminal approach and inserted a small piece of a surgical glove into the ventral epidural space of a cadaveric torso. The transforaminal approach did not alter the anatomy of the interlaminar approach, so the residents were able to practice as if it were a de novo situation. Placing the small "lesion" provided an exercise to confirm the residents were able to safely access the area and provided practice for them to carefully grasp the "lesion" and remove it. Prior to resident training on the endoscopic transforaminal approach, the course faculty utilized an interlaminar approach to place the "lesion." A questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale of agreement was completed by the residents to assess their experience with the training exercise.

RESULTS

Five residents attended the cadaver lab, and 100% strongly agreed that the cadaver lab provided a realistic representation of the procedure demonstrated, the "lesion" removal added to their educational experience, and they were overall satisfied with the educational session.

CONCLUSIONS

One of the lessons learned with this exercise that we will consider in future courses would be to place a radiodense "lesion" that could be visualized on fluoroscopy and serve as a radiologic target to find. This can help guide the trainee in knowing where to search if the "lesion" is more difficult to find.

Three-dimensional endoscopy in lumbar spine surgery as a novel approach for degenerative pathologies: a case report

Endoscopic spine surgery has evolved exponentially. However, the two-dimensional (2D) view results in lack of stereoscopic vision and depth perception, contributing to the steep learning curve. This case report recounts a world first trial of a three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic system that converts 2D to 3D images and explores its potential role in the surgical management of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The 3D endoscopic system was used for two patient cases and both 2D and 3D images were displayed side by side and compared. Advantages of the 3D endoscopic system include increased perception of depth, rapid identification of bleeding points, and greater visualization of anatomical details. Field of view and exposure were identical in 2D and 3D views. Limitations include costs and need for additional equipment. Overall, 3D endoscopy improved depth perception, instrument manoeuvrability, and recognition of anatomical details. This case report can guide further research and training in endoscopic spine surgery.

A novel endoscope-port unit for lumbar microendoscopic surgery: a single-center case series review

Minimally invasive spinal surgery has shown benefits not only from a clinical standpoint but also in some cost-effectiveness metrics. Microendoscopic procedures combine optical advantages of endoscopy with the preservation of bimanual surgical maneuvers that are not feasible with full percutaneous endoscopic procedures. TELIGEN is a new endoscopic platform designed to optimize these operations. Our aim was to present a retrospective review of surgical data from the first consecutive cases applying this device in our institution and describe some of its technical details. 25 patients have underwent procedures using this device at our institution to the date, with a mean follow-up of 341.7 ± 45.1 days. 17 decompression-only procedures, including microendoscopic discectomies (MED) and decompression of stenosis (MEDS), with or without foraminotomies (± MEF) and 8 microendoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (ME-TLIF) were performed. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were respectively 58.8 ± 17.4 years and 27.6 ± 5.3 kg/m2. Estimated blood loss (13 ± 4.8, 12.8 ± 6.98 and 76.3 ± 35.02 mL), postoperative length of hospital stay (11.2 ± 21.74, 22.1 ± 26.85 and 80.7 ± 44.60 h), operative time (130.3 ± 58.53, 121 ± 33.90 and 241.5 ± 45.27 min) and cumulative intraprocedural radiation dose (14.2 ± 6.36, 15.4 ± 12.17 and 72.8 ± 12.26 mGy) are reported in this paper for MED ± MEF, MEDS ± MEF and ME-TLIF, respectively. TELIGEN affords an expanded surgical field of view with unique engineered benefits that provide a promissing platform to enhance minimally invasive spine surgery.

A narrative review of endoscopic spine surgery: history, indications, uses, and future directions

Background and Objective

The concept of endoscopic surgery began in the 1930s and has since undergone numerous advancements in both technology and surgical indications. Its main benefit is providing the opportunity to perform surgery while minimizing disruption to surrounding structures. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history, uses, and future directions for spine endoscopic surgery.

Methods

A review of national databases was performing using key terms "endoscopic", "spine" and "surgery" for literature from 1900 to 2023. Studies that aimed to describe the utilities of endoscopic surgeries, associated outcomes, limitations, and future directions were included. Studies that were not in English were excluded.

Key Content and Findings

This review includes a brief overview of the history of endoscopic surgery and its current two main approaches, transforaminal and interlaminar approaches. It then summarizes the main indications and utilization of endoscopic surgery in the lumbar, cervical and thoracic spine, as well as expansion in managing spine tumors, infections, and outpatient surgical cases.

Conclusions

There are many rising indications and uses for endoscopic spine surgery in nearly every aspect of the spine. Compared to conventional spine surgery, there is early evidence showing endoscopic surgery is associated with less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stays, and possibly quicker recovery times. As current trends in spine surgery move towards minimally invasive techniques, it is anticipated that the use of endoscopic surgery will continue to expand.

Trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Republic of Korea: A national study utilizing the national health insurance database

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Republic of Korea (ROK) experienced three epidemic waves in February, August, and November 2020. These waves, combined with the overarching pandemic, significantly influenced trends in spinal surgery. This study aimed to investigate the trends in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery in ROK during the early COVID-19 pandemic, especially in relation to specific epidemic waves. Using the National Health Information Database in ROK, we identified all patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. A joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends in spinal surgeries over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of surgeries decreased following the first and second epidemic waves (p<0.01 and p = 0.34, respectively), but these were offset by compensatory increases later on (p<0.01 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, the third epidemic wave did not lead to a decrease in surgical volume, and the total number of surgeries remained comparable to the period before the pandemic. When compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, average LOH was reduced by 1 day during the COVID-19 period (p<0.01), while mean hospital costs increased significantly from 3,511 to 4,061 USD (p<0.01). Additionally, the transfer rate and the 30-day readmission rate significantly decreased (both p<0.01), while the reoperation rate remained stable (p = 0.36). Despite the impact of epidemic waves on monthly surgery numbers, a subsequent compensatory increase was observed, indicating that surgical care has adapted to the challenges of the pandemic. This adaptability, along with the stable total number of operations, highlights the potential for healthcare systems to continue elective spine surgery during public health crises with strategic resource allocation and patient triage. Policies should ensure that surgeries for degenerative spinal diseases, particularly those not requiring urgent care but crucial for patient quality of life, are not unnecessarily halted.

Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Background: The aging of the population in developing and developed countries has led to a significant increase in the health burden of spinal diseases. These elderly patients often have a number of medical comorbidities due to aging. The need for minimally invasive techniques to address spinal disorders in this elderly population group cannot be stressed enough. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has several proven benefits, such as minimal muscle trauma, minimal bony resection, lesser postoperative pain, decreased infection rate, and shorter hospital stay. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using PubMed. Results: Over the past 40 years, constant efforts have been made to develop newer techniques of spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery is one such subset of MISS, which has all the benefits of modern MISS. Endoscopic spine surgery was initially limited only to the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. With improvements in optics, endoscopes, endoscopic drills and shavers, and irrigation pumps, there has been a paradigm shift. Endoscopic spine surgery can now be performed with high magnification, thus allowing its application not only to lumbar spinal stenosis but also to spinal fusion surgeries and cervical and thoracic pathology as well. There has been increasing evidence in support of these newer techniques of spine surgery. Conclusions: For this report, we studied the currently available literature and outlined the historical evolution of endoscopic spine surgery, the various endoscopic systems and techniques available, and the current applications of endoscopic techniques as an alternative to traditional spinal surgery.

Do nutritional assessment tools (PNI, CONUT, GNRI) predict adverse events after spinal surgeries? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nutritional assessment tools are used to predict outcomes in cancer. However, their utility in patients undergoing spinal surgery is unclear. This review examined if prognostic nutritional index (PNI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) can predict adverse events after spinal surgeries.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Embase were screened by two reviewers for relevant studies up to 26th January 2024. The primary outcome of interest was total adverse events after spinal surgery. Secondary outcomes were surgical site infections (SSI) and mortality.

RESULTS

14 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that while reduced PNI was not associated with an increased risk of SSI there was a significant association between PNI and higher risk of adverse events. Meta-analysis showed that high CONUT was not associated with an increased risk of complications after spinal surgeries. Pooled analysis showed that low GNRI was associated with an increased risk of both SSI and adverse events. Data on mortality was scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

The PNI and GNRI can predict adverse outcomes after spinal surgeries. Limited data shows that high CONUT is also associated with a non-significant increased risk of adverse outcomes. High GNRI was predictive of an increased risk of SSI. Data on mortality is too scarce for strong conclusions.

Comparison of the Medium-term Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Discectomy and Fusion with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs) with huge herniation in the left lateral recess or central canal present challenges for oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) or endoscope-assisted OLIF procedures. Currently, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is the primary approach for this issue. This study aims to provide a standardized technical description of the anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion (ALDF) and evaluate the medium-term clinical effectiveness of both ALDF and MIS-TLIF techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on LDDs who underwent ALDF and MIS-TLIF surgery from January 2018 to January 2020. The evaluation encompassed various clinical outcomes, such as the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back pain and leg pain (VAS-back, VAS-leg), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), the 36-item short-form health survey mental component summary (SF-36 MCS), and the physical component summary (SF-36 PCS). Additionally, radiological parameters, including disc height (DH), segmental disk angle (SDA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and cross-sectional area (CSA), were assessed. Data including radiculopathy, estimated blood loss, operation time, time of getting out of bed, fusion rate, and complications were recorded. Student's independent samples t test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the differences between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 47 patients were treated by ALDF and 48 patients were treated by MIS-TLIF. The ALDF group exhibited statistically significant lower estimated blood loss and earlier time of getting out of bed compared to the MIS-TLIF group (p < 0.05). The ALDF group demonstrated lower VAS-back scores and a higher remission rate of low back pain 3 years after the surgery (p < 0.05). During the entire follow-up period, the ALDF group exhibited higher increases in DH and SDA compared to the MIS-TLIF group (p < 0.05). At 6 months, the fusion rate in the ALDF group was significantly higher than in the MIS-TLIF group (p < 0.05). The comparison revealed no statistically significant differences in complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The ALDF could be considered as a viable surgical alternative for the treatment of LDDs that necessitate ventral neural direct decompression. ALDF exhibited favorable medium-term outcomes in patients with LDDs, displaying advantages in facilitating expedited recovery, enhancing radiographic outcomes, and elevating the remission rate of low back pain. Although ALDF presents slightly higher complication rates compared to MIS-TLIF, it does not adversely affect clinical outcomes.

Pushing the Limits of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery-From Preoperative to Intraoperative to Postoperative Management

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery ushered in a new era of spine surgery by minimizing the undue iatrogenic injury, recovery time, and blood loss, among other complications, of traditional open procedures. Over time, technological advancements have further refined the care of the operative minimally invasive spine patient. Moreover, pre-, and postoperative care have also undergone significant change by way of artificial intelligence risk stratification, advanced imaging for surgical planning and patient selection, postoperative recovery pathways, and digital health solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges persist necessitating ongoing research and collaboration to further optimize patient care in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Exoscope Use in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications, Benefits, and Limitations

BACKGROUND

Exoscopes were recently developed as an alternative to the operative microscope (OM) and endoscope for intraoperative visualization during neurosurgery. Prior reviews studying mixed cranial and spinal surgical cohorts reported advantages with exoscope use, including improved ergonomics and teaching. In recent years, there has been an increase in exoscope research, with no updated systematic review focused exclusively on the benefits and limitations of exoscope use in spine surgery. Thus, we sought to systematically synthesize the literature related to exoscope-assisted spine surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies reported between 2010 and September 2023. Data, such as the exoscope model used, procedure types performed, and user observations, were then collected.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met our inclusion criteria, including 481 patients with spine pathologies who underwent a surgical procedure using 1 of 9 exoscope models. The lumbar region was the most frequently operated area (n = 234; 48.6%), and discectomies comprised the most overall procedures (n = 273; 56.8%). All patients benefited clinically. The reported advantages of exoscopes compared with OMs or endoscopes were improved focal distance, surgeon posture, trainee education, compactness, and assistant participation. Other aspects such as stereopsis, illumination, and cost had various observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Exoscopes have advantages compared with OMs or endoscopes during spine surgery. The user learning curve is minimal, and no negative patient outcomes have been reported. However, some aspects of exoscope use necessitate longer term prospective research before exoscopes can be considered a standard tool in the armamentarium of intraoperative visualization strategies.

The Evolution of Spinal Endoscopy: Design and Image Analysis of a Single-Use Digital Endoscope Versus Traditional Optic Endoscope

Spinal endoscopy has evolved significantly since its inception, offering minimally invasive solutions for various spinal pathologies. This study introduces a promising innovation in spinal endoscopy-a single-use digital endoscope designed to overcome the drawbacks of traditional optic endoscopes. Traditional endoscopes, despite their utility, present challenges such as fragility, complex disinfection processes, weight issues, and susceptibility to mechanical malfunctions. The digital endoscope, with its disposable nature, lighter weight, and improved image quality, aims to enhance surgical procedures and patient safety. The digital endoscope system comprises a 30-degree 1000 × 1000 pixel resolution camera sensor with a 4.3 mm working channel, and LED light sources replacing optical fibers. The all-in-one touch screen tablet serves as the host computer, providing portability and simplified operation. Image comparisons between the digital and optic endoscopes revealed advantages in the form of increased field of view, lesser distortion, greater close-range resolution, and enhanced luminance. The single-use digital endoscope demonstrates great potential for revolutionizing spine endoscopic surgeries, offering convenience, safety, and superior imaging capabilities compared to traditional optic endoscopes.

Near infrared imaging system for preventing blood vision obstruction in endoscopy

Spinal endoscopy procedure is commonly used in the diagnosis and treatment of various health problems and is effective. Bleeding is one of the most common complications of spinal endoscopy procedures. Blood vision obstruction (BVO), that is, obstruction of the endoscopic camera lens caused by the accumulation of blood in the surgical field, is a serious problem in endoscopic procedures. This study presents what we believe to be a new approach to addressing BVO with external multispectral imaging. The study was completed using a BVO simulation model, and the results reveal that this technology can be used to effectively overcome BVO and provide clear images of the anatomy, enabling more effective diagnosis and treatment. This technique may enable improvement of the outcomes of endoscopic procedures and could have far-reaching implications in the field of endoscopy.

The Effectiveness of Vertebral Height Restoration Based on the Vertebroplasty Procedure Used to Treat Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Whether the use of a balloon or stent in vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures, such as balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or vertebral body stenting (VBS), actually contributes to the restoration of postoperative vertebral height is unclear. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), BKP, and VBS in the correction of collapsed vertebrae in patients with painful vertebral fractures.

METHODS

The cases studied involved 34 vertebrae in 28 patients treated with PVP, 43 vertebrae in 38 patients treated with BKP, and 20 vertebrae in 20 patients treated with VBS at Izinkai Takeda General Hospital. Changes in the vertebral height and local kyphosis angle were measured based on standing lumbar radiographs before and after surgery and were compared among the treatment groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in changes in the height of the anterior wall, middle body, or posterior wall of the treated vertebrae among the 3 treatment groups. The same was true for changes in the local kyphosis angle. The effectiveness of vertebral height restoration depended heavily upon preoperative vertebral instability in all the treatment groups. Correction loss due to balloon deflation effect or balloon sinking was noted with VBS or BKP.

CONCLUSION

BKP and VBS have the advantage of reducing the risk of extravertebral leakage of injected bone cement, but they have a disadvantage in that they are no more effective than PVP in restoring collapsed vertebrae despite the use of a balloon or metal stent.

The Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review, and Future Perspective

Lumbar interbody fusion stands as a preferred surgical solution for degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The procedure primarily aims to establish lumbar segment stability, directly addressing patient symptoms associated with spinal complications. Traditional open surgery, though effective, is linked with notable morbidities and extended recovery time. To mitigate these concerns, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has garnered significant popularity, presenting an appealing alternative with numerous benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma, decreased blood loss, and expedited recovery. Among MIS procedures, full endoscopic spinal surgery, characterized by its minimal invasiveness, holds the potential to further minimize morbidities while enhancing surgical outcomes. Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, a novel procedure within this paradigm, has gained attention for offering advantages comparable to those of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. However, the safety, efficacy, and associated surgical techniques and instrument design of this method continue to be subjects of ongoing debate. This paper critically reviews current evidence on the safety, efficacy, and advantages of endoscopic lumbar spinal interbody fusion, examining whether it could indeed supersede existing mainstream techniques.

Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Preliminary Analysis of L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Outcomes in Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

A preliminary report from a single institution, noninferiority, prospective randomized controlled trial is conducted to determine the effectiveness of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) versus microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) for the treatment of L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

This prospective, noncrossover, randomized controlled trials was conducted at a single neurosurgical center. Patients with symptomatic radiculopathy or intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by LDH were enrolled from July 2016 to July 2021. The study compared the effectiveness of microscopic and full-endoscopic discectomy procedures. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index scores, radiologic measurements, endurance time of walking, and satisfaction rate.

RESULTS

Of 37 assessed patients, both IELD and MLD groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores for pain over time, with no significant difference between them. For secondary outcomes, the IELD group had a shorter hospital stay and reduced blood loss but a longer operation time than the MLD group. Radiographic evaluations showed no change compared to preoperative data. Patient satisfaction and recovery rates were slightly higher for the MLD group, but both groups were comparable in most evaluations, with complications being minimal.

CONCLUSION

The IELD was noninferior in improving the intensity of back and leg pain and functional disability, compared to the MLD. Additionally, the IELD showed no difference in clinical outcomes for patients in terms of radiographic results and patient satisfaction rates. The results of this research preliminarily demonstrate that the IELD could be considered an effective alternative to MLD for L5-S1 central or paracentral LDH.