1
|
Wilson S, Tolley C, Mc Ardle R, Beswick E, Slight SP. Key Considerations When Developing and Implementing Digital Technology for Early Detection of Dementia-Causing Diseases Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e46711. [PMID: 37606986 PMCID: PMC10481214 DOI: 10.2196/46711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes using digital technologies to accelerate global attainment of health and well-being. This has led to a growth in research exploring the use of digital technology to aid early detection and preventative interventions for dementia-causing diseases such as Alzheimer disease. The opinions and perspectives of health care professionals must be incorporated into the development and implementation of technology to promote its successful adoption in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore health care professionals' perspectives on the key considerations of developing and implementing digital technologies for the early detection of dementia-causing diseases in the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS Health care professionals with patient-facing roles in primary or secondary care settings in the NHS were recruited through various web-based NHS clinical networks. Participants were interviewed to explore their experiences of the current dementia diagnostic practices, views on early detection and use of digital technology to aid these practices, and the challenges of implementing such interventions in health care. An inductive thematic analysis approach was applied to identify central concepts and themes in the interviews, allowing the data to determine our themes. A list of central concepts and themes was applied systematically to the whole data set using NVivo (version 1.6.1; QSR International). Using the constant comparison technique, the researchers moved backward and forward between these data and evolving explanations until a fit was made. RESULTS Eighteen semistructured interviews were conducted, with 11 primary and 7 secondary care health care professionals. We identified 3 main categories of considerations relevant to health care service users, health care professionals, and the digital health technology itself. Health care professionals recognized the potential of using digital technology to collect real-time data and the possible benefits of detecting dementia-causing diseases earlier if an effective intervention were available. However, some were concerned about postdetection management, questioning the point of an early detection of dementia-causing diseases if an effective intervention cannot be provided and feared this would only lead to increased anxiety in patients. Health care professionals also expressed mixed opinions on who should be screened for early detection. Some suggested it should be available to everyone to mitigate the chance of excluding those who are not in touch with their health care or are digitally excluded. Others were concerned about the resources that would be required to make the technology available to everyone. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the need to design digital health technology in a way that is accessible to all and does not add burden to health care professionals. Further work is needed to ensure inclusive strategies are used in digital research to promote health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wilson
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Tolley
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Riona Mc Ardle
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Beswick
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah P Slight
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zeyen P, Sannemann L, Bohr L, Escher C, Müller T, Ramírez A, Rostamzadeh A, Jessen F. [Brain health services: individual dementia risk profiling at the Cologne Alzheimer Prevention Center]. DER NERVENARZT 2023; 94:392-399. [PMID: 36881112 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-023-01451-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to current knowledge approximately 30-40% of all cases of dementia can be attributed to modifiable risk factors. As a result, dementia prevention and the concept of brain health are becoming increasingly relevant. RESEARCH QUESTION The requirements for brain health services and their implementation are discussed and the Cologne Alzheimer Prevention Center (KAP) of the University Hospital Cologne is described as an example. MATERIAL AND METHODS In addition to a report on international brain health initiatives, the main activities of the KAP are presented. A program for individual risk profiling and risk communication is provided, which was piloted in the KAP in the context of the "Individual risk profiling for Alzheimer's disease and dementia prevention (INSPIRATION)" study. The prevalence of risk factors in a cognitively healthy sample aged 50-86 years (n = 162) with interest in dementia prevention is presented. RESULTS The most common risk factors were non-Mediterranean diet, obesity, subjective poor sleep quality and increased stress. Based on these results, preventive interventions can be developed that are adapted to the individual risk profile as a personalized medicine approach. DISCUSSION Structures such as the KAP can provide individual risk factor assessment and personalized dementia prevention. The efficacy of this approach on dementia risk reduction needs to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Zeyen
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Lena Sannemann
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Lara Bohr
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Claus Escher
- Klinik für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen und Gerontopsychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Bonn/Köln, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Theresa Müller
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.,Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Alfredo Ramírez
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.,Klinik für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen und Gerontopsychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Bonn/Köln, Bonn, Deutschland.,Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD), Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Ayda Rostamzadeh
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Frank Jessen
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Bonn/Köln, Bonn, Deutschland.,Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD), Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ball DE, Mattke S, Frank L, Murray JF, Noritake R, MacLeod T, Benham‐Hermetz S, Kurzman A, Ferrell P. A framework for addressing Alzheimer's disease: Without a frame, the work has no aim. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 19:1568-1578. [PMID: 36478657 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Confronting Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves patients, healthcare professionals, supportive services, caregivers, and government agencies interacting along a continuum from initial awareness to diagnosis, treatment, support, and care. This complex scope presents a challenge for health system transformation supporting individuals at risk for, or diagnosed with, AD. The AD systems preparedness framework was developed to help health systems identify specific opportunities to implement and evaluate focused improvement programs. The framework is purposely flexible to permit local adaptation across different health systems and countries. Health systems can develop solutions tailored to system-specific priorities considered within the context of the overall framework. Example metric concepts and initiatives are provided for each of ten areas of focus. Examples of funded projects focusing on screening and early detection are provided. It is our hope that stakeholders utilize the common framework to generate and share additional implementation evidence to benefit individuals with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel E. Ball
- Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Soeren Mattke
- Center for Economic and Social Research University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
| | - Lori Frank
- The New York Academy of Medicine New York New York USA
| | - James F. Murray
- Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Ryoji Noritake
- Health and Global Policy Institute, Grand Cube 3F, Otemachi Financial City Global Business Hub Tokyo Tokyo Japan
| | - Timothy MacLeod
- Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Bridgeable Toronto Ontario USA
| | | | - Alissa Kurzman
- Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- High Lantern Group Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- World Economic Forum New York New York USA
| | - Phyllis Ferrell
- Davos Alzheimer's Collaborative Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indianapolis Indiana USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saunders S, Gregory S, Clement MHS, Birck C, van der Geyten S, Ritchie CW. The European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia Programme: An Innovative Medicines Initiative-funded partnership to facilitate secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease dementia. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1051543. [PMID: 36484017 PMCID: PMC9723139 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1051543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tens of millions of people worldwide will develop Alzheimer's disease (AD), and only by intervening early in the preclinical disease can we make a fundamental difference to the rates of late-stage disease where clinical symptoms and societal burden manifest. However, collectively utilizing data, samples, and knowledge amassed by large-scale projects such as the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI)-funded European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) program will enable the research community to learn, adapt, and implement change. METHOD In the current article, we define and discuss the substantial assets of the EPAD project for the scientific community, patient population, and industry, describe the EPAD structure with a focus on how the public and private sector interacted and collaborated within the project, reflect how IMI specifically supported the achievements of the above, and conclude with a view for future. RESULTS The EPAD project was a €64-million investment to facilitate secondary prevention of AD dementia research. The project recruited over 2,000 research participants into the EPAD longitudinal cohort study (LCS) and included over 400 researchers from 39 partners. The EPAD LCS data and biobank are freely available and easily accessible via the Alzheimer's Disease Data Initiative's (ADDI) AD Workbench platform and the University of Edinburgh's Sample Access Committee. The trial delivery network established within the EPAD program is being incorporated into the truly global offering from the Global Alzheimer's Platform (GAP) for trial delivery, and the almost 100 early-career researchers who were part of the EPAD Academy will take forward their experience and learning from EPAD to the next stage of their careers. DISCUSSION Through GAP, IMI-Neuronet, and follow-on funding from the Alzheimer's Association for the data and sample access systems, the EPAD assets will be maintained and, as and when sponsors seek a new platform trial to be established, the learnings from EPAD will ensure that this can be developed to be even more successful than this first pan-European attempt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Saunders
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Gregory
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Serge van der Geyten
- Janssen Research and Development, Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Craig W. Ritchie
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Brain Health Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|