Exposure to Vedolizumab in IBD Pregnant Women Appears of Low Risk for Mother and Neonate: A First Prospective Comparison Study

Personalised therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

Appropriate Preconception Corticosteroid-Free Remission Period in Pregnant Women With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

In women with inflammatory bowel disease, at least 3 months of preconception corticosteroid-free remission (CFREM) is recommended by experts in current consensus statements. However, data are lacking on the appropriate preconception remission period. We investigated the appropriate preconception CFREM period in women with ulcerative colitis to reduce maternal disease activity and adverse pregnancy outcomes (ie, preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 141 pregnancies in women with ulcerative colitis at 2 institutions. We categorized the patients into 3 subgroups by their preconception CFREM period (≥3 months, >0 to <3 months, and non-CFREM). We also investigated disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum and adverse pregnancy outcomes in each group.

RESULTS

During pregnancy, the rate of active disease was significantly lower in the ≥3 months and >0 to <3 months CFREM groups compared with that in the non-CFREM group (P < .001 and P = .0257, respectively). Postpartum, the rate of active disease was significantly lower in the ≥3 months CFREM group compared with that in the non-CFREM group (P = .0087). The preconception CFREM period of ≥3 months was an independent inhibitory factor for active disease during pregnancy and postpartum (adjusted odds ratio, 0.15; P = .0035; and adjusted odds ratio, 0.33; P = .027, respectively). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were less common in the >3 months CFREM group compared with those in the other groups, but this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A preconception CFREM period of more than 3 months may be appropriate for better maternal and adverse pregnancy outcomes, as recommended in consensus statements.

Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Compared With Anti-TNF in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited data are available on the consequences of prenatal exposure to vedolizumab and ustekinumab. We aimed to compare the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab with that of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

METHODS

Using nationwide, comprehensive data of the EPI-MERES registry, we identified pregnancies in women with IBD in France, exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab between 2014 and 2021. We compared pregnancy outcomes and complications in the offspring according to treatment exposure during pregnancy. We applied a propensity score matching for maternal, IBD, and pregnancy characteristics.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-eight pregnancies exposed to vedolizumab were compared with 1592 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF; 464 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab were compared with 1856 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF. Overall, compared with anti-TNF, neither vedolizumab nor ustekinumab was associated with increased risks of abortion, caesarean section, stillbirth, preterm birth, serious infections, malignancies, or congenital abnormality in children. Women exposed to ustekinumab had an increased risk of small for gestational age births.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF use during pregnancy is reassuring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

IBD and Motherhood: A Journey through Conception, Pregnancy and Beyond

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) presents distinct challenges during pregnancy due to its influence on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes. This literature review aims to dissect the existing scientific evidence on pregnancy in women with IBD and provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical management. A comprehensive search was conducted across scientific databases, selecting clinical studies, systematic reviews, and other pertinent resources. Numerous studies have underscored an increased risk of complications during pregnancy for women with IBD, including preterm birth, low birth weight, neonates small for gestational age, and congenital malformations. Nevertheless, it's evident that proactive disease management before and throughout pregnancy can mitigate these risks. Continuation of IBD treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding is deemed safe with agents like thiopurines, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. However, there's a call for caution when combining treatments due to the heightened risk of severe infections in the first year of life. For small molecules, their use is advised against in both scenarios. Effective disease management, minimizing disease activity, and interdisciplinary care are pivotal in attending to women with IBD. The emphasis is placed on the continual assessment of maternal and infant outcomes and an expressed need for further research to enhance the understanding of the ties between IBD and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

An update on the safety of long-term vedolizumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (Entyvio) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that disrupts the interaction between α4β7 integrin on circulating T-lymphocytes and MAdCAM-1 on the vascular endothelium to prevent their egress to sites of gut inflammation. It has proven therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review assesses the safety profile of vedolizumab from the registration trial programs, open-label extension studies, observational real-world data, and pooled safety analyses. This includes an evaluation of the long-term overall safety in special populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease with a well-established safety profile. No unexpected long-term safety signals have been identified. Safety data in pregnancy, in pediatric and elderly populations, in patients undergoing surgery, and in patients with a prior history of cancer are reassuring. Due to its safety merits, we propose that vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for advanced combination treatment with an anti-cytokine approach using another biologic or novel small molecule inhibitor. This is important in patients with medically refractory IBD, in patients at high risk of developing disease-related complications, or in patients with concomitant uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

The Risks and Benefits of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy During Pregnancy and Postpartum: Maternal, Obstetric, and Neonatal Considerations

Importance

Autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions can lead to multiple adverse maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes, especially if they flare during pregnancy. Although many medications to control these conditions exist, concerns regarding their safety often unnecessarily limit their use.

Objective

We aim to review the current evidence available describing the use of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics in pregnancy and postpartum and understand the impact of their use on the developing fetus and neonate.

Evidence Acquisition

Original research articles, review articles, case series and case reports, and pregnancy guidelines were reviewed.

Results

Multiple retrospective (including 1924 patients) and prospective studies (including 899 patients) of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent use in pregnancy found no significant increase in rates of miscarriage, preterm birth, or congenital anomalies compared with controls. Most societies, including American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, recommend initiation or continuation of TNF-α inhibitors during pregnancy for patients with autoimmune diseases. An increased risk of mild infections in newborns has been reported, although infections requiring hospitalizations are rare. Data suggest that breastfeeding while taking anti-TNF agents is safe for neonates. Less data exist for the use of other mAbs including anticytokine, anti-integrin, and anti-B-cell agents during pregnancy and postpartum.

Conclusions and Relevance

Current evidence suggests that the use of mAbs, particularly anti-TNF agents, is safe in pregnancy and postpartum, without significant adverse effects on the pregnant patient or infant. The benefits of ongoing disease control in pregnant patients result in favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy and breastfeeding

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a peak age of diagnosis before the age of 35 years. Concerns about infertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and heritability of IBD have influenced decision-making for patients of childbearing age and their care providers. The interplay between the complex physiology in pregnancy and IBD can affect placental development, microbiome composition and responses to therapy. Current evidence has shown that effective disease management, including pre-conception counselling, multidisciplinary care and therapeutic agents to minimize disease activity, can improve pregnancy outcomes. This Review outlines the management of IBD in pregnancy and the safety of IBD therapies, including novel agents, with regard to both maternal and fetal health. The vast majority of IBD therapies can be used with low risk during pregnancy and lactation without substantial effects on neonatal outcomes.

Australian inflammatory bowel disease consensus statements for preconception, pregnancy and breast feeding

OBJECTIVE

Because pregnancy outcomes tend to be worse in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than in those without, we aimed to update consensus statements that guide the clinical management of pregnancy in patients with IBD.

DESIGN

A multidisciplinary working group was established to formulate these consensus statements. A modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used, consisting of a literature review, online voting, discussion meeting and a second round of voting. The overall agreement among the delegates and appropriateness of the statement are reported.

RESULTS

Agreement was reached for 38/39 statements which provide guidance on management of pregnancy in patients with IBD. Most medications can and should be continued throughout pregnancy, except for methotrexate, allopurinol and new small molecules, such as tofacitinib. Due to limited data, no conclusion was reached on the use of tioguanine during pregnancy. Achieving and maintaining IBD remission before conception and throughout pregnancy is crucial to optimise maternofetal outcomes. This requires a multidisciplinary approach to engage patients, allay anxieties and maximise adherence tomedication. Intestinal ultrasound can be used for disease monitoring during pregnancy, and flexible sigmoidoscopy or MRI where clinically necessary.

CONCLUSION

These consensus statements provide up-to-date, comprehensive recommendations for the management of pregnancy in patients with IBD. This will enable a high standard of care for patients with IBD across all clinical settings.

Pregnancy and medications for inflammatory bowel disease: An updated narrative review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often diagnosed during the peak reproductive years of young women. Women with active IBD around conception are at a significantly increased risk of disease relapse during pregnancy, which is associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Given these substantial risks, it is prudent that disease remission should ideally be achieved before conception. Unfortunately, some patients may experience a disease flare-up even if they are in a state of remission before pregnancy. Patients must continue their IBD medications to reduce the risk of disease flare and subsequent poor outcomes during the gestational and postpartum periods. When treating IBD flare-ups during pregnancy, the management is quite similar to the therapeutic approach for non-pregnant patients with IBD, including 5-aminosalicylate, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and biologic therapies. While the data regarding the safety of CNIs in pregnant women with IBD is limited, the findings in our recent meta-analysis suggest that CNIs may be safer to use in those with IBD than in solid organ transplant recipients. There are several types of biologics and small-molecule therapies currently approved for IBD, and physicians should thoroughly understand their clinical benefits and safety profiles when utilizing these treatments in the context of pregnancy. This review highlights recent studies, including our systematic review and meta-analysis, and discusses the clinical advantages and safety considerations of biologics and small molecules for pregnant women with IBD.

Pregnancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-A Literature Review

In recent years, we have faced an increasing incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially among young people, affecting them during their reproductive years. The paucity of data and reduced knowledge regarding the evolution of the disease during pregnancy and the adverse effects of the therapy on the mother and infant increase voluntary childlessness in this group of patients. Depending on the type of IBD, severity and surgical or medical management, this can negatively affect the pregnancy. C-sections and the risk of low-birth-weight babies are higher in women with IBD, independent of active/inactive disease, while preterm birth, stillbirth and miscarriage are associated with disease activity. In the last period, medicinal therapy has evolved, and new molecules have been developed for better control of the lesions, but the effect on pregnancy and breastfeeding is still controversial. We conducted this review by studying the literature and recent research in order to have a better image of the practical management of IBD during pregnancy.

Personalize, participate, predict, and prevent: 4Ps in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a complex, immune-mediated, disorder which leads to several gastrointestinal and systemic manifestations determining a poor quality of life, disability, and other negative health outcomes. Our knowledge of this condition has greatly improved over the last few decades, and a comprehensive management should take into account both biological (i.e., disease-related, patient-related) and non-biological (i.e., socioeconomic, cultural, environmental, behavioral) factors which contribute to the disease phenotype. From this point of view, the so called 4P medicine framework, including personalization, prediction, prevention, and participation could be useful for tailoring ad hoc interventions in IBD patients. In this review, we discuss the cutting-edge issues regarding personalization in special settings (i.e., pregnancy, oncology, infectious diseases), patient participation (i.e., how to communicate, disability, tackling stigma and resilience, quality of care), disease prediction (i.e., faecal markers, response to treatments), and prevention (i.e., dysplasia through endoscopy, infections through vaccinations, and post-surgical recurrence). Finally, we provide an outlook discussing the unmet needs for implementing this conceptual framework in clinical practice.

Reported congenital malformations after exposure to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics: A retrospective comparative study in EudraVigilance

AIMS

To evaluate the number and nature of reported congenital malformations (CMs) after intrauterine exposure to non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor biologics (non-TNFi biologics) compared to certolizumab pegol (CZP).

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted in the EudraVigilance (EV) database. A safe biologic (CZP) was considered as the reference group. Odds ratios (ORs) for CMs were calculated for each non-TNFi biologic (including abatacept, anakinra, belimumab, ixekizumab, rituximab, secukinumab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab and vedolizumab), versus CZP (quantitative assessment). Then, CM patterns were reviewed in consultation with a clinical geneticist (qualitative assessment).

RESULTS

ORs were not statistically significant except for belimumab and vedolizumab (similar in magnitude). Except for vedolizumab, no specific CM patterns were observed for the included non-TNFi biologics. Three cases of corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) were identified for vedolizumab (versus none in CZP and other investigated non-TNFi biologics). Two of the CCA cases were associated with other neurological CMs (one cerebral ventriculomegaly with microcephaly and one polymicrogyria). This may indicate that these CCAs are related to undiagnosed genetic alterations or are associated with the underlying maternal disease, although a definite relationship with vedolizumab exposure cannot be ruled out.

CONCLUSION

No special safety signal was identified regarding the occurrence of CMs after exposure to abatacept (n = 64), anakinra (n = 20), belimumab (n = 93), ixekizumab (n = 29), rituximab (n = 57), secukinumab (n = 128), tocilizumab (n = 124) and ustekinumab (n = 215). Regarding observed CCAs in the vedolizumab group (n = 113), no firm conclusions can be made based on available information.

Ustekinumab during pregnancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) often receive biologics to maintain remission during pregnancy.

AIMS

To assess maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with IBD treated with ustekinumab (UST) during pregnancy METHODS: In a multicentre, prospective cohort study, we recruited women with IBD treated with UST during pregnancy between 2019 and 2021. Outcomes were compared among patients treated with UST, anti-tumour necrosis factor α, (anti-TNF) and non-UST, non-anti-TNF therapies. UST-treated patients were matched 1:2 to controls according to age, body mass index and parity. Newborns were followed up to 12 months.

RESULTS

We recruited 129 pregnant patients: UST 27; anti-TNF 52; non-UST, non-anti-TNF 50 (thiopurine or mesalazine 30, no therapy 20); Crohn's disease 25 (96.9%). Overall, pregnancy, neonatal and newborn outcomes were satisfactory, with no significant differences among patients treated with UST, anti-TNF and non-UST non-anti-TNF agents for obstetrical maternal complications [UST 3 (11.5%), anti TNF 12 (23.1%), non UST, non-anti-TNF 4 (8.2%), p = 0.095], pre-term delivery [1 (4.3%), 9 (18.4%), 4 (5.7%), p = 0.133], low birth weight [1 (4.2%), 5 (10.2%), 4 (8.3%), p = 0.679], or first year newborn hospitalisation [2 (9.1%), 4 (8.2%), 3 (6.1%), p = 0.885].

CONCLUSION

Pregnant patients with IBD treated with UST demonstrated favourable pregnancy and neonatal outcomes that were comparable with those in patients treated with anti-TNF or other therapy. Data are reassuring for patients with IBD and their physicians when considering UST during pregnancy.

Vedolizumab Antagonizes MAdCAM-1-Dependent Human Placental Cytotrophoblast Adhesion and Invasion In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Anti-α4β7 (Vedolizumab) treats inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by blocking the interaction between integrin α4β7 on leukocytes and mucosal addressin cell-adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) on the gut endothelium. Women with IBD often require continuing biologic therapy during pregnancy to avoid disease flare. To date, there have been no reports of an increase in adverse events with Vedolizumab use during pregnancy. Notably, integrins play a major role in human placental development during pregnancy. It is unknown whether Vedolizumab disrupts placental cell (cytotrophoblast) invasion and/or adhesion by blocking interactions with MAdCAM-1. We therefore investigated human placental expression of MAdCAM-1, the role of MAdCAM-1/α4β7 interactions in cytotrophoblast invasion/adhesion in vitro, and whether Vedolizumab administration in vivo alters the placental structure.

METHODS

Histological sections of placentas from normal pregnancies were evaluated for MAdCAM-1 expression by immunofluorescence. The impacts of Vedolizumab or anti-integrin β7 on human cytotrophoblast invasion and adhesion were assessed. Histology results from term placentas of 2 patients with IBD receiving Vedolizumab were compared to those of untreated healthy controls.

RESULTS

Placental MAdCAM-1 expression was predominantly associated with invading extravillous cytotrophoblasts at the maternal-fetal interface. Treatment of isolated primary cytotrophoblasts with Vedolizumab or anti-integrin β7 significantly reduced Matrigel invasion, adherence to a MAdCAM-1-coated substrate, and interactions with HuT-78 cells. Placentas from 2 Vedolizumab-treated patients with IBD exhibited pronounced pathologic features as compared to healthy control specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a previously unrecognized role for α4β7 and MAdCAM-1 in human placentation. More clinical and histological data from Vedolizumab-treated pregnant patients will be necessary to determine whether this medication poses any risk to the mother and fetus.

Biologics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Their Safety in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Biologics are used routinely in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but large-scale data reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes among biologic users are lacking. We sought to estimate the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD on biologic therapies.

METHODS

We searched major databases from inception to June 2020 for studies estimating the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in IBD when using biologics (anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF], anti-integrins, and anticytokines). Prevalence and relative risk (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising 6963 patients. Biologic therapy in IBD pregnancies was associated with a pooled prevalence of 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%; I2 = 87.4%) for early pregnancy loss, 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%; I2 = 89.9%) for preterm birth, 0% (95% CI, 0%-0%; I2 = 0%) for stillbirth, 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; I2 = 87.0%) for low birth weight, and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%; I2 = 78.3%) for congenital malformations. These rates are comparable with those published in the general population. In subgroup analyses of a small number of studies, the prevalence of early pregnancy loss and preterm birth were higher in vedolizumab vs anti-TNF users. Meta-regression did not show an association of disease activity or concomitant thiopurine on adverse outcomes. Continued TNF inhibitor use during the third trimester was not associated with risk of preterm birth (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.77-2.60; I2 = 0%), low birth weight (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.80-2.18; I2 = 0%), or congenital malformations (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.47-3.49; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnant IBD women using biologics are comparable with that of the general population. PROSPERO protocol #CRD42019135721.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Safety of vedolizumab during pregnancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Vedolizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, often affecting women of child-bearing age. We aimed to compare maternal and fetal adverse outcomes in pregnancies of women with inflammatory bowel disease exposed to vedolizumab versus those on other treatment.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search through December 2020 looking for studies including outcomes from pregnancies of female inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab. Our primary outcome was a composite of adverse pregnancy-related events in pregnancies of female patients on vedolizumab compared with those of disease-matched controls on other medication regimens. Events of interest included preterm births, early loss of pregnancy, late fetal death, elective termination of pregnancy, and congenital anomalies.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in our review meeting criteria for our primary analysis. Compared with those with no vedolizumab exposure, pregnancies with vedolizumab exposure had an increase in overall adverse pregnancy-related outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-3.13). The vedolizumab group also had increased preterm births (OR 2.16, 95% CI, 1.28-3.66), and early loss of pregnancies (OR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.06-3.01) but no difference in number of live births (OR 0.60, 95%CI, 0.36-1.00), or congenital malformations (OR 1.56, 95% CI, 0.56-4.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review highlights possible concern with the general safety of vedolizumab in pregnancy, as an increase in overall total unfavorable outcomes was observed. Premature births and early loss of pregnancy were also more prevalent in pregnant female patients on vedolizumab. It is possible these findings are confounded by disease activity, and further prospective cohort studies of vedolizumab and pregnancy outcomes are warranted.

Differences in the placental pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab and ustekinumab during pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab demonstrated different placental pharmacokinetics than other immunoglobulin G1 antibodies, leading to lower drug levels in cord blood in contrast to maternal blood at the time of delivery. The placental transfer of ustekinumab seems to have a pattern similar to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. Current evidence on the placental pharmacokinetics of vedolizumab and ustekinumab is limited. We aimed to assess the placental transfer of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

Consecutive women from a prospective observational study who were exposed to ustekinumab or vedolizumab within 2 months prior to conception or during pregnancy were included. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels were measured in maternal and cord blood at the time of delivery.

RESULTS

Drug levels were available in 31 infant-mother pairs (15 exposed to ustekinumab and 16 to vedolizumab). The median maternal and newborn ustekinumab levels were 5.3 mg/l and 10.3 mg/l, respectively (the median infant-to-maternal ratio was 1.7), while the median maternal and cord vedolizumab levels were 7.3 mg/l and 4.5 mg/l (the median infant-to-maternal ratio was 0.66). The ustekinumab levels in cord blood positively correlated with the maternal levels at delivery (ρ = 0.751, p = 0.001). However, no correlation with the timing of the last drug administration was found. In contrast, the vedolizumab levels in cord blood demonstrated significant positive correlation with the maternal levels (ρ = 0.831, p < 0.001) along with the gestational week of the last infusion (ρ = 0.736, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab demonstrated different placental pharmacokinetics, leading to lower drug levels in cord blood compared to maternal blood at delivery; in contrast, the placental transfer of ustekinumab seems to have a pattern similar to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents.

The use of biological agents in pregnant women affected by autoimmune disorders: Why we need more research of this neglected area

Women of childbearing age are largely affected by several autoimmune disorders (the estimates range between 1.5 and 10 per 10,000). The increasing number of effective biological agents has dramatically revolutionized the treatment of these clinical conditions, ameliorating the patient's quality of life. The use of these agents by women during pregnancy is growing to ensure the disease activity control and avoid adverse health outcomes. However, for many newer biological agents, the degree of information concerning their use in pregnancy is often incomplete to perform a conclusive risk assessment on fetal and maternal health given the exclusion of this specific population from pharmacological clinical trials. More recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has confirmed the unacceptable inequities of pharmacological research and medical treatment for pregnant and lactating women, exacerbating the need for filling the gaps of quantitative and qualitative pharmacology data in this sensitive population. ere we summarize (i) what is already known about safety and effectiveness of biological agents in this understudied population (with specific focus on pregnancy-related health outcomes), and what we are going to learn from the on-going studies among pregnant women treated with biological agents; (ii) the methodological and ethical considerations that characterize the pharmacological research in pregnancy, also discussing emerging evidence on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in this clinical setting.

The safety of drugs for inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and breastfeeding: the DUMBO registry study protocol of GETECCU

BACKGROUND

Active disease during conception and pregnancy in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. The use of IBD treatments during pregnancy should be weighed against their adverse effects on the neonate, but longer-term safety data and data on serious infection rates and malignancies postnatally are lacking, particularly for newer drugs, such as tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab.

METHODS

This ongoing, prospective registry study being conducted at 70 centres in Spain is enrolling pregnant women who are ⩾18 years, are at any point in pregnancy up to the end of the second trimester and have a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or unclassified IBD. Patients will receive treatment decided independently by their IBD specialist. Each incident gestation will be followed up through pregnancy and the first 4 years postnatally. Three cohorts will be compared: biologicals exposed, immunomodulatory exposed and non-exposed. The primary endpoint is the risk of severe infection in newborns postnatally up to 4 years of age; other endpoints include serious adverse events (SAEs) such as pregnancy and delivery complications, neonatal SAEs, development [Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ3)], and malignancy incidence, up to 4 years of age. IBD specialists will collect maternal data (baseline/end of each trimester/1 month post-delivery), neonatal birth data, and the SAE and ASQ3 data in children exposed during pregnancy, reported every 3 months by the mother. Statistical analysis will include summary statistics for quantitative variables, comparisons of qualitative variables with significance set at p < 0.025 and a binary logistic regression model to determine the risk factors for severe infections.

RESULTS

Enrolment began in September 2019 and study completion is expected in September 2028.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, controlled study will provide evidence on the long-term safety profile in children after intrauterine and lactation exposure to biological and immunomodulatory IBD treatments, including data on postnatal severe infections, development and malignancies.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03894228.

Safety of New Biologics (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) and Small Molecules (Tofacitinib) During Pregnancy: A Review

Two new biological drugs (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and one small molecule (tofacitinib) have been recently approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, we must be familiar with the safety of these "new" drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. In the present article, we critically review available data on the safety of new biologics (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with special focus on women with inflammatory bowel disease. Bibliographical searches (MEDLINE) up to April 2020 were performed. The timing and mechanisms of placental transfer of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are expected to be similar to anti-TNF agents. Animal studies show no evidence of adverse effects on pre- or post-natal development after administration of vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Just a few studies including patients treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab during pregnancy have been published, reporting uneventful pregnancies in most cases. The clinical programme of both drugs and post-marketing studies showed no new safety concerns. Due to the expected safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab during pregnancy, it may be recommended to plan the final pregnancy dose approximately 8 or 12 weeks, respectively, before the estimated date of delivery. Live vaccines should be avoided for up to a year in children exposed in utero to vedolizumab or ustekinumab unless drug elimination has been documented. Miniscule amounts of vedolizumab and ustekinumab are transferred to breast milk, so breastfeeding is probably safe. There is no evidence of adverse effect of vedolizumab or ustekinumab paternal exposure. Regarding tofacitinib, it is reasonable to assume that this molecule crosses the placenta from the beginning of pregnancy. In animal studies, tofacitinib was feticidal and teratogenic in rats and rabbits, although at exposures many times greater than the standard human dose. Reported outcomes of pregnancy cases identified from tofacitinib randomised controlled trials, post-approval and non-interventional studies, and spontaneous adverse-event reporting appear similar to those observed in the general population. Nevertheless, at present, the use of tofacitinib during pregnancy should be avoided. Although no human studies have reported outcomes of breastfeeding with small molecules such as tofacitinib, this drug is present in lactating rat milk so, at present, breastfeeding should be avoided. Pregnancy among patients with paternal exposure to tofacitinib appears to be safe. In summary, we can conclude that new biologic agents (vedolizumab and ustekinumab) and small molecules (tofacitinib) should be used during pregnancy only if the benefits to the mother outweigh the risks to the mother and unborn child.

The Risk of Adverse Neonatal Outcomes With Maternal Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine pooled incidences and risk factors for these outcomes.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through May 2019 for studies reporting adverse neonatal outcomes in IBD. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The pooled incidence of preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, and infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit was 8.6% (95% CI, 7.0%-10.1%), 8.9% (95% CI, 7.3%-10.5%), 2.1% (95% CI, 1.6%-2.6%), and 4.9% (95% CI, 2.9%-6.9), respectively. Compared with healthy controls, patients with IBD were more likely to deliver infants with low birth weight (<2500 grams; OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.16-6.66) and infants admitted to the intensive care unit (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.83-6.05). Patients with Crohn's disease had an increased incidence of congenital anomalies (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.43-6.42). Among IBD patients, active disease was associated with increased incidence of preterm birth (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.21-3.51), low birth weight (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.54-5.70), and small for gestational age (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.18-5.83). Antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) use during pregnancy was associated with an increased incidence of neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.31-4.45) and low birth weight (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD, particularly with active disease or requiring anti-TNF therapy, may be at increased risk of developing adverse neonatal outcomes.

Use of medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Introduction: The peak age of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurs during childbearing years, therefore management of IBD during pregnancy is a frequent occurrence. Maintenance of disease remission is crucial to optimize pregnancy outcomes, and potential maternal or fetal toxicity from medications must be balanced against the risks of untreated IBD.Areas covered: This review summarizes the literature on safety and use of medications for IBD during pregnancy and lactation.Expert opinion: 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids and thiopurines are safe for use during pregnancy, while methotrexate and tofacitinib should only be used with extreme caution. Anti-TNF agents (except certolizumab), vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib readily traverse the placenta via active transport, therefore theoretically may affect fetal development. Certolizumab only undergoes passive transfer across the placenta, thus has markedly lower cord blood levels making it likely the safest biologic agent for infants. There is reasonable evidence to support the safety of anti-TNF monotherapy and combination therapy during pregnancy and lactation. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are also thought to be safe in pregnancy and lactation, while tofacitinib is generally avoided due to teratogenic effects in animal studies.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease 2020

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a general term for chronic or remitting/relapsing inflammatory diseases of the intestinal tract and generally refers to ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Since 1950, the number of patients with IBD in Japan has been increasing. The etiology of IBD remains unclear; however, recent research data indicate that the pathophysiology of IBD involves abnormalities in disease susceptibility genes, environmental factors and intestinal bacteria. The elucidation of the mechanism of IBD has facilitated therapeutic development. UC and CD display heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management depends on the understanding and tailoring of evidence-based interventions by physicians. In 2020, seventeen IBD experts of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology revised the previous guidelines for IBD management published in 2016. This English version was produced and modified based on the existing updated guidelines in Japanese. The Clinical Questions (CQs) of the previous guidelines were completely revised and categorized as follows: Background Questions (BQs), CQs, and Future Research Questions (FRQs). The guideline was composed of a total of 69 questions: 39 BQs, 15 CQs, and 15 FRQs. The overall quality of the evidence for each CQ was determined by assessing it with reference to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and the strength of the recommendation was determined by the Delphi consensus process. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance for on-site physicians is provided regarding indications for proceeding with the diagnosis and treatment.

Women's Health and Ulcerative Colitis

Although ulcerative colitis affects males and females at similar rates, certain sex-specific differences influence the disease-related risks and experiences of females with ulcerative colitis. This article reviews topics that affect females with ulcerative colitis, including the impact of disease on the menstrual cycle, fertility, child bearing, sexual health, and recommendations for health care maintenance.

Inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy: fertility, complications and treatment

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly diagnosed and treated in the young population. Therefore, it is common that women anticipating or undergoing pregnancy will have to cope with the additional burden of their IBD. Pregnancy in an IBD patient also presents challenges for the practitioner, in that the usual diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium of potential tests and therapies is disrupted. This review covers the implications of IBD for fertility, pregnancy and offspring, and discusses the management of IBD in pregnancy.

Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications.

RESULTS

A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations.

Safety of vedolizumab in the treatment of pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease: a targeted literature review

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) commonly affect women in their childbearing years. Vedolizumab (VDZ) is approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe CD and UC, but there is a knowledge gap regarding its use during pregnancy. This targeted literature review describes available evidence on safety of VDZ in pregnant patients in order to offer physicians a detailed and balanced view on persistent data during their decision-making process for an individualized treatment concept.

METHODS

The search included literature from the MEDLINE database and abstracts of five gastroenterological conferences published until November 2019. Publications were included if pregnancy outcomes in women receiving VDZ or neonatal outcomes in newborns of women previously exposed to VDZ were reported.

RESULTS

Out of 196 initially identified records, 18 publications reporting results of five different studies were identified. In total, for 213 of 284 VDZ-exposed documented pregnancies the following pregnancy outcomes were reported: 167 live births (172 infants due to twin births), 1 stillbirth, 35 miscarriages, 10 elective terminations (1 due to detected Down syndrome). Furthermore, during pregnancy, the following complications were observed: seven cases of (pre) eclampsia, three cases of premature rupture of membranes and one case each of placenta previa, chorioamnionitis, pneumonia, first-trimester bleeding, cholestasis, sepsis, or neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage. Based on 172 infants, 30 preterm deliveries (17.4%), 9 cases of low birth weight (5.2%), 5 infections (2.9%), and 6 cases (3.8%) with congenital anomalies were reported.

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence for safety concerns regarding pregnancy outcomes associated with VDZ therapy. Due to the limited scope of included records, further research is needed to understand the safety profile regarding the use of VDZ during pregnancy.

Patient's profiling for therapeutic management of inflammatory bowel disease: a tailored approach

Introduction: Several biological drugs and a new small molecule are available for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, to date, no reliable predictors of response to treatment have yet been identified. Areas covered: We focused on studies evaluating the therapeutic management of patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases in order to identify any predictive factors of response to drugs and to guide therapeutic decisions based on patient and disease characteristics. Expert opinion: The heterogeneity of literature data, the main retrospective nature of the scientific evidence, and the lack of comparative head-to-head trials are the most relevant limitations for identifying factors predicting drug response. In the near future, a personalized approach to patients with chronic inflammatory diseases will be based on patient's profile to define not only the best drug to use, but also the appropriate follow-up, and the possibility of home care.

IBD in pregnancy: recent advances, practical management

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses complex issues in pregnancy, but with high-quality care excellent pregnancy outcomes are achievable. In this article, we review the current evidence and recommendations for pregnant women with IBD and aim to provide guidance for clinicians involved in their care. Many women with IBD have poor knowledge about pregnancy-related issues and a substantial minority remains voluntarily childless. Active IBD is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, low for gestation weight and fetal loss. With the exception of methotrexate and tofacitinib the risk of a flare outweighs the risk of IBD medication and maintenance of remission from IBD should be the main of care. Most women with IBD will experience a normal pregnancy and can have a vaginal delivery. Active perianal Crohn's disease is an absolute and ileal pouch surgery a relative indication for a caesarean section. Breast feeding is beneficial to the infant and the risk from most IBD medications is negligible.

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Special Populations: Obese, Old, or Obstetric

The epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is progressively evolving impacting the type of patients with IBD we will see in clinical practice. In this review, we discuss specific challenges and solutions in the management of (1) obese, (2) older and (3) obstetric (pregnant) patients with IBD. With the global obesity epidemic, almost 1 in 3 patients with IBD are obese. Obesity is associated with greater difficulty in achieving remission, higher risk of disease relapse and higher burden and costs of hospitalization in patients with IBD. Obese patients also have inferior response to biologic therapy related to altered pharmacokinetics and obesity-mediated chronic inflammation. Surgical management of obese patients with IBD is also challenging. Similar to obesity, the prevalence of IBD in older patients is rising and it is anticipated that almost one-third of patients with IBD will be older than 60 years within the next decade. Older patients present unique diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas, and management of these individuals warrants careful consideration of the risks of disease-related versus treatment-related complications, non-IBD-related extra-intestinal complications (eg, cardiovascular disease, malignancy), in the context of individual values, preferences, functional status and comorbidities. With evolving therapeutics, medical management of IBD surrounding pregnancy continues to be challenging. Overall, the management of pregnant patients requires a pro-active, multidisciplinary approach, with an emphasis on optimal disease control not just during, but prior to pregnancy. This often involves continuation of highly effective therapies, of which the vast majority are safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding, resulting in a reduction of risk of adverse maternal fetal outcomes.

Reproduction and Pregnancy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Management and Treatment Based on Current Guidelines

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affect mainly young population. Therefore, fertility and pregnancy are important clinical issues to be considered. Generally, fertility in IBD patients is not decreased either in males or females when compared to a healthy population. Moreover, drugs used for IBD treatment do not significantly affect fertility in humans. However, prolonged treatment with sulphasalazine may reduce semen quality and cause reversible infertility. Since the disease course and a risk of pregnancy-related complications depend mainly on disease activity at the time of conception, female patients with IBD should plan their pregnancy during a remission phase. Methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and thalidomide are strongly contraindicated during pregnancy. Other medications used for IBD seem to be safe provided that they are administered with caution. In 2015, European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) published its Consensus on Reproduction and Pregnancy in IBD. However, management of IBD during the reproductive age and during pregnancy still remains controversial, since evidence-based data come mostly from retrospective studies. The aim of this paper was to discuss the issue of reproduction and pregnancy in IBD patients based on current ECCO guidelines and literature.

The impact of pregnancy on biologic therapies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Active inflammatory bowel disease during conception and pregnancy has been associated with adverse materno-fetal outcomes. Patients are often unduly concerned about the adverse effects of biologic medications on the growing fetus, however, continuing therapy is advised, with potential risks of therapy outweighed by the risks of active maternal disease. A number of physiological changes associated with pregnancy can alter the absorption, distribution and elimination of these therapies, which may impact on their safety and efficacy. We review the current evidence regarding the effects of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of biologic therapies, as well as drug concentration measurements during pregnancy and at time of delivery. A greater understanding of the impact of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of biologic therapies and the emerging utilisation of drug concentration monitoring during pregnancy may lead to improved materno-fetal outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

The effect of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on pregnancy-related outcomes remains unknown.

AIM

To determine the risk of adverse maternal, placental and obstetric outcomes in IBD METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane library through May 2019 for studies reporting adverse maternal, placental and obstetric outcomes in patients with IBD. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for these outcomes in patients with IBD compared to healthy controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies were included (7917 IBD pregnancies and 3253 healthy control pregnancies). Caesarean delivery was more common in patients with IBD compared to healthy controls (OR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.16-2.77). This remained significant for UC (OR 1.80, 95% CI, 1.21-2.90) but not CD (OR 1.48, 95% CI, 0.94-2.34). Similarly, gestational diabetes occurred more commonly in IBD (OR 2.96, 95% CI, 1.47-5.98). The incidences of placental diseases were 2.0% (95% CI, 0.9%-3.1%) for pre-eclampsia, 3.3% (95% CI, 0%-7.2%) for placental abruption, 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.9%) for placenta previa and 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-0.5%) for chorioamnionitis. Patients with IBD were more likely to experience preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (OR 12.10, 95% CI, 2.15-67.98), but not early pregnancy loss (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.49-5.43). Anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy was not associated with chorioamnionitis (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.16-7.67), early pregnancy loss (OR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.83-2.64) or placenta previa (OR 1.58, 95% CI, 0.30-8.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational diabetes and preterm prelabour rupture of membranes occurs more commonly in patients with IBD, although the incidence of placental diseases remains low.

First-Line Biologics or Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Practical Guide for the Clinician

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treating moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease has become increasingly complex as the array of available biologics increases. Moreover, tofacitinib, the first small molecule approved for IBD, is available for use in ulcerative colitis. Choosing the right biologic, for the right patient, at the right time, can be a confusing and daunting task for clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we summarize the evidence for first-line use of the available biologics by disease state. Special circumstances for consideration including rapidity of action, safety, comparative effectiveness, postoperative Crohn's disease, fertility and pregnancy, and extraintestinal manifestations are discussed. In the moderate-to-severe UC patient, vedolizumab and infliximab are preferred first-line options. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with a penetrating phenotype or with multiple EIMs, infliximab or adalimumab are the preferred first-line agents. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with an inflammatory phenotype, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab are all reasonable options.

Preconception counseling of females with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are commonly diagnosed in women of childbearing age. As such, pregnancy is often encountered in this subset of patients. Management of pregnancy in IBD patients poses numerous challenges as ensuring the safety of the mother and the fetus is required. Disease remission prior to pregnancy is a key determinant of both the course of IBD throughout gestation and pregnancy outcome. Thus, adequate preconception care is of paramount importance in order to achieve optimal maternal and perinatal outcomes and maintain disease quiescence throughout gestation. In addition, preconception care has a major role in improving patient's knowledge, concerns and misbeliefs related to reproductive-health issues among IBD patients. In this review, we discuss the various aspects involved in the preconception care of IBD patients.

Pregnancy outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, anti-TNF or conventional therapy: results of the European CONCEIVE study

BACKGROUND

Women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) often receive biologicals during pregnancy to maintain disease remission. Data on outcome of vedolizumab-exposed pregnancies (VDZE) are sparse.

AIMS

To assess pregnancy and child outcomes of VDZE pregnancies and to compare these results to anti-TNF exposed (TNFE) or both immunomodulatory and biologic unexposed (CON IBD) pregnancies.

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre case-control observational study was performed.

RESULTS

VDZE group included 79 pregnancies in 73 IBD women. The TNFE and CON IBD group included 186 pregnancies (162 live births) in 164 IBD women and 184 pregnancies (163 live births) in 155 IBD women, respectively. At conception, cases more often had active disease ([VDZE: 36% vs TNFE: 17%, P = .002] and [VDZE: 36% vs CON IBD: 24%, P = .063]). No significant difference in miscarriage rates were found between groups (VDZE and TNFE: 16% vs 13%, P = .567; VDZE and CON IBD: 16% vs 10%, P = .216). In live-born infants, median gestational age and birthweight were similar between groups. Median Apgar score at birth was numerically equal. Prematurity was similar in the VDZE group compared to the control groups, even when correcting for disease activity during pregnancy. The frequency of congenital anomalies was comparable between groups as were the percentages of breastfed babies. During the first year of life, no malignancies were reported and infants' infection risk did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

No new safety signal was detected in VDZE pregnancies although larger, prospective studies are required for confirmation.

Effect of biologicals and JAK inhibitors during pregnancy on health-related outcomes in children of women with inflammatory bowel disease

Current guidelines advise to maintain immunomodulators and biologicals in pregnant patients because relapse of inflammatory bowel is associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcome. With the exception of Methotrexate, IBD therapy seems not to be related to an increase of congenital malformations or infections requiring hospitalisation of the babies, although the effect the on the developing immune system of the exposed infants remains unknown. In this review we will focus on the effect of IBD drugs on health-related outcomes in children taking into account possible long-term effects of biologicals and immunomodulators, which are transferred across the placenta.

Anti-trafficking agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the latest developments in the field of anti-trafficking agents (ATAs), a class of therapeutics with growing importance in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) that specifically inhibit steps of immune cell trafficking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several translational and clinical studies have further shaped the knowledge about the mechanisms and effects of the anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab. In parallel, new ATAs like the anti-β7 integrin antibody etrolizumab and the anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody ontamalimab are investigated in phase III clinical trials and might soon increase the therapeutic armamentarium in IBD.

SUMMARY

ATAs have unique mechanisms of action and can meanwhile be considered an indispensable column of IBD therapy. Further efforts are necessary to elucidate complex mechanistic aspects, to exactly define their role in relation to other therapeutic approaches and to identify novel treatment targets as well as biomarkers for personalized medicine.

Maneuvering Clinical Pathways for Ulcerative Colitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have brought about several advances in the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we discuss salient recommendations of recent treatment guidelines; review the efficacy, safety, and real-world data of vedolizumab and tofacitinib; appraise their place vis-à-vis established agents; and consider the newly proposed approaches of risk-stratified and treat-to-target therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Once daily oral mesalamine dosing is equivalent to split dosing in mild-moderate UC. Real-world data are accumulating on the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for moderate to severe UC, while there are few such data on the most recently approved agent, tofacitinib. High-dose infliximab is being investigated for severe UC. New approaches are challenging the established paradigm of selecting therapy based on current disease activity. The risk-stratified approach incorporates long-term risk as well as the current burden of inflammation. The treat-to-target approach aims at improved long-term outcomes by adjusting therapy to resolve intestinal inflammation. The therapeutic options for UC are continually expanding. Risk-stratified therapy and the treat-to-target approach represent paradigm shifts in UC management. Optimal disease control requires an individualized approach that takes into consideration current inflammatory burden, long-term risk, patient preferences, and ongoing assessment of response to treatment.