Home Infliximab Infusions Are Associated With Suboptimal Outcomes Without Cost Savings in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Adverse Events and Compliance Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated With Home- vs Office-Based Biologic Infusions

BACKGROUND

Biologic medications are a common therapy for those with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are limited data on the outcomes of home-based biologic infusions for patients with IBD. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of biologic infusions for IBD patients who receive either home- or office-based administration.

METHODS

Patients receiving infliximab or vedolizumab were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 152 weeks. Survival free of major adverse events including delayed infusion reaction, steroid initiation, drug discontinuation, or IBD-related emergency department visits, admission, and surgery were compared using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Individual adverse events, infusion-.related quality measures, and markers of patient adherence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Adverse event-free survival was greater among those receiving home-based infusion (n = 154) compared with office-based infusion (n = 133). The office infusion cohort had higher rates of delayed infusion reactions (4 vs 0), IBD-related surgery (6 vs 0), and drug discontinuation (44 vs 35); this was a sicker cohort of patients compared with those in the home infusion group. Home infusion patients were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab (71.7% vs 89.3%), obtain labs for drug monitoring (53.2% vs 71.4%), and adhere to routine clinic visits (37.9% vs 58.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The home-based infusion of biologics for IBD appears safe with lower rates of major adverse events compared with office-based infusions. However, those receiving home infusion were less likely to receive correct weight-based dosing for infliximab and were poorly adherent to routine follow-up.

The Cost of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care - How to Make it Sustainable

The rising global prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, underscores the need to examine current and future IBD care costs. Direct health care expenses, including ambulatory visits, hospitalizations, and medications, are substantial, averaging $9,000 to $12,000 per person annually in high-income regions. However, these estimates do not fully account for factors such as disease severity, accessibility, and variability in health care infrastructure among regions. Indirect costs, predominantly stemming from loss in productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and other intangible costs, further contribute to the financial burden of IBD. Despite efforts to quantify indirect costs, many aspects remain poorly understood, leading to an underestimation of their actual impact. Challenges to achieving cost sustainability include disparities in access, treatment affordability, and the absence of standardized cost-effective care guidelines. Strategies for making IBD care sustainable include early implementation of biologic therapies, focusing on cost-effectiveness in settings with limited resources, and promoting the uptake of biosimilars to reduce direct costs. Multidisciplinary care teams leveraging technology and patient-reported outcomes also hold promise in reducing both direct and indirect costs associated with IBD. Addressing the increasing financial burden of IBD requires a comprehensive approach that tackles disparities, enhances access to cost-effective therapeutics, and promotes collaborative efforts across health care systems. Embracing innovative strategies can pave the way for personalized, cost-effective care accessible to all individuals with IBD, ensuring better outcomes and sustainability.

Outcomes for Standardized Home and Hospital-Based Infusions of Infliximab for Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is commonly treated with infliximab in a hospital setting. Utilization of home infusions (HI) is increasing due to insurance mandates, travel time savings, and convenience. We evaluated adverse outcomes (AOs) of infliximab infusions in children with IBD receiving HI compared to hospital-based infusions.

METHODS

Children receiving HI between September 2016 and September 2018 were retrospectively matched based on age, race, ethnicity, sex, and disease type to a cohort receiving infliximab at a hospital-based center. A survival analysis evaluated the hazard ratio for AOs in HI relative to hospital-infused children over 2 years. AOs were defined as discontinuation of therapy for clinically relevant reasons, IBD-related hospitalizations, and emergency department visits.

RESULTS

We included 102 children (51 pairs) (63% male, 91% White, 92% Crohn disease). Disease location, behavior, growth status, and disease severity were similar between the 2 cohorts. Quiescent disease increased from 3% to 93% after 2 years without cohort differences. At baseline, 94% of HI patients and 88% of controls were on 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks as standard maintenance therapy. Within 2 years, only 19% remained on 5 mg/kg and the remainder required increased dosing or decreased interval. The HI cohort had fewer labs obtained ( P < 0.001), though laboratory values, number of clinic visits, and frequency of AOs were similar.

CONCLUSION

Drug durability, AOs, and laboratory values were similar between HI and hospital-based infusions. These findings suggest HI may be as effective as hospital-based infusions, provided a standardized care approach is utilized.

Inflammatory bowel disease patient concerns and experiences on transition to home-based infusions during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC issued guidance advising patients and providers to adopt social distancing practices such as home-based infusions (H-BI).

METHODS

We performed a mixed methods evaluation to summarize perceptions, concerns, and experiences with H-BI among all inflammatory bowel disease patients 18-90 years of age who transitioned to home-based infliximab or vedolizumab infusions between March to July 2020 at a tertiary care center. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an iterative, inductive thematic approach. Baseline characteristics and outcome on safety, COVID-19 transmission, delays in infusions, and H-BI persistence were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 57 participants who transitioned to H-BI, 20 (33%) responded. Four major categories and six major themes related to expectations, experience, perceived safety, and logistical factors were identified. Initial perceptions were mixed, however these resolved. One patient developed COVID-19, one patient experienced an adverse event, 12 (21%) patients experienced an infusion delay, and 6 (11%) patients transitioned from H-BI.

DISCUSSION

Despite mixed initial perceptions, respondents had a positive experience with most respondents planning to continue H-BI after the pandemic resolves. Several real-world actionable barriers were identified related to scheduling, communication between stakeholders, and nursing quality. No major safety concerns were identified.

Denials, Dilly-dallying, and Despair: Navigating the Insurance Labyrinth to Obtain Medically Necessary Medications for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Increasingly, in the United States, the prescribing of high-cost drugs has become a challenge for physicians and other practitioners. Such drugs are highly regulated by third-party payers (aka insurance), as well as pharmacy benefit managers. Not infrequently, a clinician prescribing a medication will have the payment for the prescription denied by the third-party payer, with the end result being a delay in getting a medically necessary medication to a patient. This article highlights the challenges involved in the prior authorization and denial process, with a focus on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. The article reviews the role of pharmacy benefits managers in restricting access to drugs, and the reasons why denials of medically necessary medications may occur. The article also provides information on how to appeal denials, how to write a letters of medical necessity, and how to conduct a proper peer-to-peer review. Advocacy from patients and clinicians will be important, as we want to reform the process in the future.

An overview of ozanimod as a therapeutic option for adults with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract involving a dysregulated immune response. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is involved in immune cell regulation. S1P-receptor modulators, such as ozanimod, inhibit lymphocyte migration and have therapeutic potential in UC.

AREAS COVERED

Ozanimod is the first S1P-receptor modulator approved for the treatment of UC. It acts as a functional antagonist, causing internalization of S1P receptors on T-cells. Lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes is inhibited, and migration to sites of active inflammation is curtailed. There are several S1P-receptor subtypes, present in various organs, which inform understanding of ozanimod's side-effect profile including bradycardia and macular edema. In this review, the authors discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of ozanimod in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

EXPERT OPINION

The S1P-receptor modulator ozanimod is an oral small molecule with a rapid onset of action and a novel therapeutic mechanism in the treatment of UC. It is an effective treatment both in bio-naïve and bio-exposed patients. Although the safety profile of ozanimod looks favorable, more long-term data are needed. Further studies are required to compare ozanimod to currently available therapies to best define its positioning in UC treatment algorithms.

An IRF1-dependent Pathway of TNFα-induced Shedding in Intestinal Epithelial Cells

BACKGROUND

Shedding of intestinal epithelial cells [IECs] is a potent cause of barrier loss which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. TNFα can induce IEC shedding, but little is known about this process.

METHODS

To investigate the molecular mechanism regulating IEC shedding, mice lacking interferon regulatory factor1 [IRF1], caspase-3, or gasdermin E [GSDME] and their control wild-type [WT] littermates were intravenously injected with tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] to establish an IEC shedding model. A dual-luciferase reporter assay and a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay were used to determine the role of IRF1 in regulating caspase-3 expression.

RESULTS

TNFα administration induced obvious IEC shedding in WT mice, but IRF1-/- and caspase-3-/-mice were completely protected from TNFα-induced IEC shedding. As a critical transcription factor, IRF1 was found to be required for caspase-3 expression in IECs by binding to IRF1-binding sites in the caspase-3 promoter. In WT mice, plasma membrane integrity was disrupted in shed IECs; these cells were swollen and contained GSDME-N terminal [NT] fragments which are responsible for the induction of pyroptosis. However, in GSDME-/- mice, plasma membrane integrity was not disrupted in shed IECs, which were not swollen and did not contain GSDME-NT, indicating that GSDME converted TNFα-induced IEC shedding into a pyroptotic cell death process. In addition, IRF1 deficiency resulted in decreases in mucosal inflammation and mucosal bacteria levels in TNFα-challenged colons.

CONCLUSIONS

IRF1 deficiency maintains intestinal barrier integrity by restricting TNFα-induced IEC shedding.

Home Infusions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are Safe: US Experience and Patient Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Home infusions (HIs) for biologic medications are an option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in the United States. We aimed to describe the population receiving HIs and report patient experience with HIs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Quintiles-IMSLegacy PharMetrics Adjudicated Claims Database from 2010 to 2016 to describe the population receiving infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) HIs and determine predictors for an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. We then administered a cross-sectional survey to IBD Partners Internet-based cohort participants to assess knowledge and experience with infusions.

RESULTS

We identified claims for 11 892 conventional IFX patients, 1573 home IFX patients, 438 conventional VDZ patients, and 138 home VDZ patients. There were no differences in demographics or median charges with IFX home and conventional infusions. Home VDZ infusions had a greater median charge than conventional VDZ infusion. Less than 4% of patients had an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. Charlson comorbidity index > 0 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.77) and Medicaid (OR: 3.01; 95% CI, 1.53-5.94) conferred significantly higher odds of urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. In IBD Partners, 644 IBD patients responded; 56 received HIs. The majority chose HIs to save time and preferred HIs to conventional infusions. Only 2 patients reported an urgent/emergent visit for HI-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

HI appears to be safe in IBD patients receiving IFX and VDZ. However, patients with fewer resources and more comorbidities are at increased risk for an urgent/emergent visit post-HIs. The overall patient experience with HI is positive. Expansion of HIs may result in decreased therapy-related logistic burden for carefully selected patients.