A Comparison of Prognostic Scores (Mayo, UK-PBC, and GLOBE) in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of Saroglitazar Magnesium in Cholestatic Cirrhosis With Hepatic Impairment and Participants With Renal Impairment

Saroglitazar magnesium, a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, currently in Phase III for treating primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), was evaluated for its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, safety, and pharmacodynamics in participants with cholestatic liver disease (CLD) across different levels of hepatic impairment (HI) and participants with severe renal impairment (RI). Three PK studies comparing saroglitazar with healthy controls were conducted: Study 1 involved daily oral doses of 1 or 2 mg for 4 weeks in 12 PBC cirrhosis participants with mild or moderate HI; Study 2 assessed single-dose PK (2 or 4 mg) in eight non-cirrhotic CLD participants; Study 3 evaluated single-dose PK (2 mg) in eight participants with severe RI. On day 1, saroglitazar exposure increased by 14.6-42% in mild HI vs. normal, but by day 28, levels were similar, indicating no accumulation. In moderate HI, exposure was significantly increased by 50.4-85% on days 1 and 28, with 34-46% lower clearance despite a similar half-life. The moderate HI group had a 59% higher exposure than the non-cirrhotic group. Saroglitazar (1 and 2 mg) reduced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels by 17-40% after 4 weeks in participants with abnormal baseline ALP. Single-dose PK in non-cirrhotic CLD (2 and 4 mg) and severe RI (2 mg) was comparable to matched controls without significant safety issues. Overall, saroglitazar (1 and 2 mg) was safe and well-tolerated in cholestatic cirrhosis with mild HI and participants with severe RI without major PK changes. Moderate HI increased exposure and decreased clearance without any safety concerns.

The External Validation of GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores for Predicting Ursodeoxycholic Acid Treatment Response in a Large U.S. Cohort of Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients

Background: The cornerstone treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but many patients exhibit an incomplete response, leading to disease progression. Risk prediction models like the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores hold promise for patient stratification and management. We aimed to independently assess the predictive accuracy of these risk scores for UDCA response in a prospective U.S. cohort. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a U.S. liver center, monitoring UDCA-treated PBC patients over a one-year follow-up. We evaluated the predictive efficacy of the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores for UDCA treatment response, comparing them to the Paris II criteria. Efficacy was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses, followed by prognostic performance evaluation via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: We evaluated 136 PBC patients undergoing UDCA therapy. Based on the Paris II criteria, patients were categorized into UDCA full-response and non-response groups. The GLOBE score identified a non-responder rate of 18% (p = 0.205), compared to 20% (p = 0.014) with the Paris II criteria. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for age and biochemical markers, showed that both the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were strongly associated with treatment response (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.95) for the GLOBE score and 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99) for the UK-PBC risk score. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that GLOBE and UK-PBC scores effectively predict UDCA treatment response in PBC patients. The early identification of patients at risk of an incomplete response could improve treatment strategies and identify patients who may need second-line therapies.

Prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis

Aim: Evaluating prognostic scores' utility in predicting ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) biochemical response (BR) and long-term liver-related complications in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. Patients & methods: This retrospective single-center study included 50 predominantly female PBC patients (median age: 56) on UDCA treatment. BR was defined by Paris II criteria. Liver-related complications during a median 76-month follow-up were assessed. APRI, ALBI, Mayo, GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were calculated. Results: 64% achieved BR, while 40% experienced liver-related complications. All scores showed good BR prediction (concordance statistics: 0.76-0.94) and excellent negative predictive values for 5-year liver complications (concordance statistics: 0.73-0.89). Conclusion: Implementing these scores in clinical practice is encouraged due to their effectiveness in predicting BR- and liver-related events.

Systemic Oxidative Balance Reflects the Liver Disease Progression Status for Primary Biliary Cholangitis (Pbc): The Narcissus Fountain

Biological antioxidant potential (BAP) and Reactive Oxygen Metabolites (dROMs) are two tests complementarily assessing systemic oxidative statuses (SOSs) that are never applied in chronic liver disorders (CLDs). We enrolled 41 ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-naïve Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) patients [age: 58.61 ± 11.26 years; females (F): 39], 40 patients with metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic livers (age: 54.30 ± 11.21; F: 20), 52 patients with HBV (age: 52.40 ± 8.22; F: 34), 50 patients with (age: 56.44 ± 7.79, F: 29), and 10 controls (age: 52.50 ± 9.64; F: 7). Liver fibrosis and the steatosis severity were determined using transient elastography, and the SOS was balanced using d-ROMs and the BAP test. The gene expressions of superoxide dismutase (SOD1; SOD2) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx1) were evaluated using real-time PCR in advanced fibrosis (AF: F3F4) in patients with PBC. In contrast to other CLDs, in PBC the dROMs and BAP levels were, respectively, directly and inversely correlated with hepatic fibrosis (dROMs, R: 0.883; BAP, R: -0.882) and steatosis (dROMs, R: 0.954; BAP, R: -0931) severity (p < 0.0001 all). Patients with PBC also revealed a progressively increasing trend of d-ROMs (F0-F2 vs. F3: p = 0.0008; F3 vs. F4: p = 0.04) and reduction in BAP levels (F0-F2 vs. F3: p = 0.0007; F3 vs. F4 p = 0.04) according to the worsening of liver fibrosis. In AF-PBC, the SOD1, SOD2, and GPx1 expressions were significantly downregulated in patients presenting SOS imbalance (SOD1, p = 0.02; SOD2, p = 0.03; GPx1, p = 0.02). SOS disequilibrium represents a leitmotiv in patients with PBC, perfectly reflecting their liver disease progression status.

The clinical value of the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and alkaline phosphatase-to-platelet ratio in primary biliary cholangitis

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) and alkaline phosphatase-to-platelet ratio (APPR) in the diagnosis and prognosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Clinical and laboratory data were retrospectively collected and analyzed from 92 PBC patients, 92 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), 120 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 124 healthy controls (HCs). We compared the levels of MHR and APPR among the groups with PBC, AIH, CHB and HCs, and analyzed the correlations between MHR and APPR with laboratory indices including aspartate aminotransferase platelet ratio index, fibrosis index based on 4 factors, and Mayo score in PBC. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the diagnostic performance of MHR and APPR for PBC, AIH, and CHB, respectively. MHR and APPR were significantly increased in PBC group than that in AIH, CHB and HCs groups (each P < .05). MHR and APPR were significantly higher in Child class B|C than that in class A in PBC patients. (P < .01, P < .05, respectively). MHR and APPR were positively related to the Mayo score [R = 0.508 (P < .001), R = 0.295 (P = .008), respectively]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of MHR and APPR in diagnosing PBC were 0.764 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.699-0.821, P < .001) and 0.952 (95% CI: 0.915-0.977, P < .001), respectively, and the area under the curve of the combination of both was 0.974 (95% CI: 0.941-0.991, P < .001). MHR and APPR may prove to be useful prognostic biomarkers for PBC, and the combination of MHR and APPR have some clinical diagnostic value of PBC.

Treatment response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment response definitions have been introduced in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, the lack of a gold standard results in heterogeneity in second-line treatment research and clinical practice.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore which UDCA treatment response endpoint serves as the most accurate predictive model of long-term outcome.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of UDCA treatment response endpoints (and corresponding validations) were performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen individual UDCA treatment response endpoints and 96 external validations were found. Barcelona, Paris-1, Paris-2, Rotterdam, Toronto and GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores are currently most robustly validated in external populations. The results show that the continuous models (GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores) serve as the most accurate predictive models. Besides standard UDCA treatment response endpoints, the alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin normalization has been suggested as a new therapeutic target.

CONCLUSIONS

The GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores are the most suitable for the real-world allocation of second-line therapies (obeticholic acid and fibrates). However, in the wake of the recent findings, alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin normalization should be the primary outcome in trial research in PBC.

Prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Due to the chronic progressive disease characteristics of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), patients with advanced PBC should not be ignored. Most prognostic score studies have focused on early stage PBC.

AIM

To compare the prognostic value of various risk scores in advanced PBC to help PBC patients obtain more monitoring and assessment.

METHODS

This study considered patients diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization between 2015 and 2021. The clinical stage was primarily middle and late, and patients usually took ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) after diagnosis. The discriminatory performance of the scores was assessed with concordance statistics at baseline and after 1 year of UDCA treatment. Telephone follow-up was conducted to analyze the course and disease-associated outcomes. The follow-up deadline was December 31, 2021. We compared the risk score indexes between those patients who reached a composite end point of death or liver transplantation (LT) and those who remained alive at the deadline. The combined performance of prognostic scores in estimating the risk of death or LT after 1 year of UDCA treatment was assessed using Cox regression analyses. Predictive accuracy was evaluated by comparing predicted and actual survival through Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

We included 397 patients who were first diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization and received UDCA treatment; most disease stages were advanced. After an average of 6.4 ± 1.4 years of follow-up, 82 patients had died, and 4 patients had undergone LT. After receiving UDCA treatment for 1 year, the score with the best discrimination performance was the Mayo, with a concordance statistic of 0.740 (95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.791). The albumin-bilirubin, GLOBE, and Mayo scores tended to overestimate transplant-free survival. Comparing 7 years of calibration results showed that the Mayo score was the best model.

CONCLUSION

The Mayo, GLOBE, UK-PBC, and ALBI scores demonstrated comparable discriminating performance for advanced stage PBC. The Mayo score showed optimal discriminatory performance and excellent predictive accuracy.

New Treatment Paradigms in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an archetypal autoimmune disease. Chronic lymphocytic cholangitis is associated with interface hepatitis, ductopenia, cholestasis, and progressive biliary fibrosis. People living with PBC are frequently symptomatic, experiencing a quality-of-life burden dominated by fatigue, itch, abdominal pain, and sicca complex. Although the female predominance, specific serum autoantibodies, immune-mediated cellular injury, as well as genetic (HLA and non-HLA) risk factors, identify PBC as autoimmune, to date treatment has focused on cholestatic consequences. Biliary epithelial homeostasis is abnormal and contributes to disease. The impact of cholangiocyte senescence, apoptosis, and impaired bicarbonate secretion enhances chronic inflammation and bile acid retention. First-line therapy is a non-specific anti-cholestatic agent, ursodeoxycholic acid. For those with residual cholestasis biochemically, obeticholic acid is introduced, and this semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor agonist adds choleretic, anti-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory activity. Future PBC licensed therapy will likely include peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) pathway agonists, including specific PPAR-delta agonism (seladelpar), as well as elafibrinor and saroglitazar (both with broader PPAR agonism). These agents dovetail the clinical and trial experience for off-label bezafibrate and fenofibrate use. Symptom management is essential, and encouragingly, PPAR agonists reduce itch; IBAT inhibition (eg, linerixibat) also appears promising for pruritus. For those where liver fibrosis is the target, NOX inhibition is being evaluated. Earlier stage therapies in development include therapy to impact immunoregulation in patients, as well other approaches to treating pruritus (eg, antagonists of MrgprX4). Collectively the PBC therapeutic landscape is exciting. Therapy goals are increasingly proactive and individualized and aspire to rapidly achieve normal serum tests and quality of life with prevention of end-stage liver disease.

The Albumin-Bilirubin Score as a Predictor of Liver-Related Mortality in Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Compensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Although several prognostic scores have been reported to correlate with the prognosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, there are limited tools to predict the prognosis of PBC with compensated cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic performance of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score in PBC patients with compensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of 219 patients with compensated PBC cirrhosis to evaluate the prognostic performance of the ALBI using Cox regression model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

During follow-up, a total of 19 subjects (8.7%) met the primary endpoint of liver-related death or liver transplantation (LT). Patients who died/underwent LT have higher ALBI score (-1.06 vs. -2.06, p < 0.001) at baseline than those who survived. ALBI score (hazard ratio: 15.011, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.045-44.665, p < 0.001) was associated with an increase in liver-related mortality or LT. ALBI score had the best discriminative capacity to predict the 5-year liver-related mortality (area under the ROC curve: 0.871, 95% CI [0.820, 0.913]) compared with other prognostic scores. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-off value of ALBI score was -1.47, with 90.0% sensitivity and 76.6% specificity. Also, the probability of transplant-free survival decreased with increasing ALBI grade (log-rank p = 0.003). The 5-year transplant-free survival rates of patients in grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 were 100.0%, 96.4%, and 89.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ALBI score is a simple and effective predictive factor estimating the clinical outcome of patients with compensated PBC cirrhosis and provides better prognostic performance compared with other prognostic scores.

Primary biliary cholangitis as a roadmap for the development of novel treatments for cholestatic liver diseases†

The discovery of nuclear receptors and transporters has contributed to the development of new drugs for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases. Particular progress has been made in the development of second-line therapies for PBC. These new drugs can be separated into compounds primarily targeting cholestasis, molecules targeting fibrogenesis and molecules with immune-mediated action. Finally, drugs aimed at symptom relief (pruritus and fatigue) are also under investigation. Obeticholic acid is currently the only approved second-line therapy for PBC. Drugs in the late phase of clinical development include peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, norursodeoxycholic acid and NADPH oxidase 1/4 inhibitors.

Contemporary Epidemiology of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a cholestatic liver disease with potential evolution to liver cirrhosis when left untreated. Despite being rare, PBC has a substantial impact on the quality of life and survival of affected patients. Women are the most diagnosed worldwide; however, male subjects seem to have more aggressive disease and worse prognosis. Changing epidemiologic trends are emerging in PBC, with increasing global prevalence and slight smoothing of sex differences. In this review we present available data on incidence rates and prevalence of PBC worldwide, highlighting geographic differences and factors impacting clinical outcomes.

The effect of serum IL-2 levels on the prognosis of primary biliary cholangitis-related liver failure and the preliminary exploration of its mechanism

Background

In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the levels of serum IL-2 were involved in liver inflammation and immune changes. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of serum IL-2 combined with total bilirubin (TBIL) in liver failure and cytokine changes during the disease.

Methods

A total of 160 PBC patients treated with UDCA were included. Parameters at admission were collected, and the COX regression model was used to predict independent risk factors associated with PBC disease progression. We identified the optimal cut-off values and prognosis effects of serum IL-2 and TBIL based on the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We also analyzed the incidence of liver failure with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. In addition, the changes of cytokines (mainly IL-2) in liver tissues and blood samples from 11 patients with end-stage PBC liver failure and five healthy controls were examined.

Results

Age, IL-2, ALB, γ-GT, ALP, TBIL, Hb, TBA, WBC, and PLT, as well as anti-Sp100, were found to be independent risk factors in PBC patients with liver failure. Patients with decreased serum IL-2 levels and increased TBIL levels have a significantly higher incidence of liver failure and a worse prognosis. Patients with advanced PBC liver failure after liver transplantation exhibited a significant decrease in levels of serum IL-2 and a relatively immunosuppressed status.

Conclusions

The combination of serum IL-2 and TBIL can be a predictor of the progression of liver failure in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, and it is likely to be related to the expression of GM-CSF and G-CSF.

The prognostic value of antibodies to gp210 among patients with primary biliary cholangitis in Northeast China

BACKGROUND

Whether the anti-gp210 antibody can be used as a biomarker in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains controversial.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the association between anti-gp210 antibodies and prognosis in ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated PBC patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 UDCA-treated PBC patients to assess the prognostic value of anti-gp210 antibodies using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients included in our analysis, 50 (27.8%) were anti-gp210 positive, and 130 (72.2%) were anti-gp210 negative. The incidence of liver-related death or transplantation was more common in the anti-gp210 + group (22.0 vs. 9.2%, P=0.022). The five-year transplant-free survival rates of anti-gp210-positive patients vs. anti-gp210-negative patients were 77.0% and 90.3%, respectively. We found that the probability of transplant-free survival was significantly lower in the anti-gp210-positive patients than in the anti-gp210-negative patients (log-rank P=0.004). After adjusting for potential confounders using multivariable Cox regression model, positivity for anti-gp210 antibody (hazard ratio: 4.619, 95% confidence interval: 1.895-11.261, P=0.001) was found to be independently associated with an increase in liver-related mortality or transplantation.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of UDCA-treated PBC patients, positivity for anti-gp210 antibody was independently associated with a higher risk of liver-related death or transplantation.