Total Body Irradiation using VMAT (RapidArc): A Planning Study of a novel treatment delivery method

A novel AP/PA total body irradiation technique using abutting IMRT fields at extended SSD

PURPOSE

To develop a Total Body Irradiation (TBI) technique using IMRT at extended SSD that can be performed in any size Linac room.

METHODS

Patients studied were placed on a platform close to the floor, directly under the gantry with cranial-caudal axis parallel to the gantry rotation plane and at SSD ∼200 cm. Two abutting fields with the same external isocenter at gantry angles of ±21˚, collimator angle of 90˚, and field size of 25 × 40 cm2 are employed for both supine and prone positions. An iterative optimization algorithm was developed to generate a uniform dose at the patient mid-plane with adequate shielding to critical organs such as lungs and kidneys. The technique was validated in both phantom and patient CT images for treatment planning, and dose measurement and QA were performed in phantom.

RESULTS

A uniform dose distribution in the mid-plane within ±5% of the prescription dose was reached after a few iterations. This was confirmed with ion-chamber measurements in phantom. The mean dose to lungs and kidneys can be adjusted according to clinical requirements and can be as low as ∼25% of the prescription dose. For a typical prescription dose of 200 cGy/fraction, the total MU was ∼2400/1200 for the superior/inferior field. The overall treatment time for both supine/prone positions was ∼54 min to meet the maximum absorbed dose rate criteria of 15 cGy/min. IMRT QA with portal dosimetry shows excellent agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a promising TBI technique using abutting IMRT fields at extended SSD. The patient is in a comfortable recumbent position with good reproducibility and less motion during treatment. An additional benefit of this technique is that full 3D dose distribution is available from the TPS with a DVH summary for organs of interest. The technique allows precise sparing of lungs and kidneys and can be executed in any linac room.

Improved organ sparing using auto-planned Stanford volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation technique

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dosimetric differences between auto-planned volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) technique and two-dimensional radiotherapy using anterior-posterial/posterio-anterial beams (2D AP/PA) TBI technique.

METHODS

Ten pediatric patients treated with VMAT-TBI on Varian c-arm linac were included in this study. VMAT-TBI plans were generated using our in-house developed and publicly shared auto-planning scripts. For each VMAT-TBI plan, a 2D AP/PA plan was created replicating the institution's clinical setup with the patient positioned at extended source to skin distance (SSD) with a compensator to account for differences in patient thickness, 50% transmission daily lung blocks, and electron chest wall boosts prescribed to 50% of the photon prescription. Clinically relevant metrics were analyzed and compared between the VMAT and 2D plans.

RESULTS

All VMAT-TBI plans achieved planned target volume (PTV) D90% ≥ 100% of prescription. VMAT-TBI PTV D90% significantly increased (7.1% ± 2.9%, p < .001) compared to the 2D technique, whereas no differences were observed in global Dmax (p < .2) and PTV V110% (p < .4). Compared to the 2D plans, significant decreases in the Dmean to the lungs (-25.6% ± 11.5%, p < .001) and lungs-1 cm (-34.1% ± 10.1%, p < .001) were observed with the VMAT plans. The VMAT technique also enabled decrease of dose to other organs: kidneys Dmean (-32.5% ± 5.0%, p < .001) and lenses Dmax (-5.3% ± 8.1%, p = .03); and in addition, for 2 Gy prescription: testes/ovaries Dmean (-41.5% ± 11.5%, p < .001), brain Dmean (-22.6% ± 5.4%, p = .002), and thyroid Dmean (-18.2% ± 16.0%, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Superior lung sparing with improved target coverage and similar global Dmax were observed with the VMAT plans as compared to 2D plans. In addition, VMAT-TBI plans provided greater dose reductions in gonads, kidneys, brain, thyroid, and lenses.

The Stanford VMAT TBI Technique

PURPOSE

In this work, we describe the technical aspects of the XXX VMAT TBI technique, compare it to other VMAT TBI techniques, and share our initial experience.

METHODS

From September 2019 to August 2021, 35 patients were treated with VMAT TBI at our institution. Treatment planning was performed using in-house developed automated planning scripts. Organ sparing depended on the regimen: myeloablative (lungs, kidneys, and lenses); non-myeloablative with benign disease (lungs, kidneys, lenses, gonads, brain, and thyroid). Quality assurance was performed using EPID portal dosimetry and Mobius3D. Robustness was evaluated for the first ten patients by performing local and global isocenter shifts of 5 mm. Treatment was delivered using IGRT for every isocenter and every fraction. In-vivo measurements were performed on the matchline between the VMAT and AP/PA fields and on the testes for the first fraction.

RESULTS

The lungs, lungs-1cm, and kidneys D_mean were consistently spared to 57.6±4.4%, 40.7±5.5%, and 70.0±9.9% of the prescription dose, respectively. Gonadal sparing (D_mean=0.69±0.13 Gy) was performed for all patients with benign disease. The average PTV D_1cc was 120.7±6.4% for all patients. The average Gamma passing rate for the VMAT plans was 98.1±1.6% (criteria of 3%/2mm). Minimal differences were observed between Mobius3D- and EclipseAAA-calculated PTV D_mean (0.0±0.3%) and lungs D_mean (-2.5±1.2%). Robustness evaluation showed that the PTV D_max and lungs D_mean are insensitive to small positioning deviations between the VMAT isocenters (1.1±2.4% and 1.2±1.0%, respectively). The average matchline dose measurement indicated patient setup was reproducible (96.1±4.5% relative to prescription dose). Treatment time, including patient setup and beam-on, was 47.5±9.5 min.

CONCLUSIONS

The XXX VMAT TBI technique, from simulation to treatment delivery, was presented and compared to other VMAT TBI techniques. Together with publicly shared autoplanning scripts, our technique may provide the gateway for wider adaptation of this technology and the possibility of multi-institutional studies in the cooperative group setting.

Feasibility study of volumetric modulated arc therapy with Halcyon™ linac for total body irradiation

Background

The use of total body irradiation (TBI) with linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been steadily increasing. Helical tomotherapy has been applied in TBI and total marrow irradiation to reduce the dose to critical organs, especially the lungs. However, the methodology of TBI with Halcyon™ linac remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether VMAT with Halcyon™ linac can be clinically used for TBI.

Methods

VMAT planning with Halcyon™ linac was conducted using a whole-body computed tomography data set. The planning target volume (PTV) included the body cropped 3 mm from the source. A dose of 12 Gy in six fractions was prescribed for 50% of the PTV. The organs at risk (OARs) included the lens, lungs, kidneys, and testes.

Results

The PTV D_98%, D_95%, D_50%, and D_2% were 8.9 (74.2%), 10.1 (84.2%), 12.6 (105%), and 14.2 Gy (118%), respectively. The homogeneity index was 0.42. For OARs, the D_mean of the lungs, kidneys, lens, and testes were 9.6, 8.5, 8.9, and 4.4 Gy, respectively. The V_12Gy of the lungs and kidneys were 4.5% and 0%, respectively. The D_max of the testes was 5.8 Gy. Contouring took 1–2 h. Dose calculation and optimization was performed for 3–4 h. Quality assurance (QA) took 2–3 h. The treatment duration was 23 min.

Conclusions

A planning study of TBI with Halcyon™ to set up VMAT-TBI, dosimetric evaluation, and pretreatment QA, was established.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01959-3.

Practice patterns of pediatric total body irradiation techniques: A Children's Oncology Group survey

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine current practice patterns in pediatric total body irradiation (TBI) techniques among xxx member institutions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between Nov 2019 and Feb 2020 a questionnaire, containing 52 questions related to the technical aspects of TBI was sent to medical physicists at 152 xxx institutions. The questions were designed to obtain technical information on commonly used TBI treatment techniques. Another set of 9 questions related to the clinical management of patients undergoing TBI was sent to 152 xxx member radiation oncologists at the same institutions.

RESULTS

Twelve institutions were excluded because TBI was not performed in their institutions. A total of 88 physicists from 88 institutions (63% response rate) and 96 radiation oncologists from 96 institutions responded (69% response rate). The AP/PA technique was the most common (49 institutions - 56%); 44 institutions (50%) used the lateral technique and 14 institutions (16%) used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)/Tomotherapy. Mid-plane dose rates of 6-15 cGy/min were most commonly used. The most common specification for lung dose was the mid lung dose for both AP/PA (71%) and lateral (63%) techniques. All physician responders agreed with the need to refine current TBI techniques and 79% supported the investigation of new TBI techniques to further lower the lung dose.

CONCLUSION

There is no consistency in the practice patterns, methods for dose measurement and reporting of TBI doses among xxx institutions. The lack of a standardization precludes meaningful correlation between TBI doses and clinical outcomes including disease control and normal tissue toxicity. The xxx radiation oncology discipline is currently undertaking several steps to standardize the practice and dose reporting of pediatric TBI using detailed questionnaires and phantom-based credentialing for all xxx centers.

A Step Toward Making VMAT TBI More Prevalent: Automating the Treatment Planning Process

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to automate the treatment planning process for total body irradiation (TBI) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two scripts were developed to facilitate autoplanning: the binary plug-in script automating the creation of optimization structures, plan generation, beam placement, and setting of the optimization constraints and the stand-alone executable performing successive optimizations. Ten patients previously treated in our clinic with VMAT TBI were used to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed autoplanning process. Paired t tests were used to compare the dosimetric indices of the produced auto plans to the manually generated clinical plans. In addition, 3 physicians were asked to evaluate the manual and autoplans for each patient in a blinded retrospective review.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the manual and autoplan global D_max (P < .893), planning target volume V110% (P < .734), kidneys D_mean (P < .351), and bowel D_max (P < .473). Significant decreases in the D_mean to the lungs and lungs-1cm (ie, lungs with 1-cm inner margin) volumes of 5.4% ± 6.4% (P < .024) and 6.8% ± 7.4% (P < .017), respectively, were obtained with the autoplans compared with the manual plans. The autoplans were selected 77% of the time by the reviewing physicians as equivalent or superior to the manual plans. The required time for treatment planning was estimated to be 2 to 3 days for the manual plans compared with approximately 3 to 5 hours for the autoplans.

CONCLUSIONS

Large reductions in planning time without sacrificing plan quality were obtained using the developed autoplanning process compared with manual planning, thus reducing the required effort of the treatment planning team. Superior lung sparing with the same target coverage and similar global D_max were observed with the autoplans as compared with the manual treatment plans. The developed scripts have been made open-source to improve access to VMAT TBI at other institutions and clinics.

A Preliminary Report of Gonadal-Sparing TBI Using a VMAT Technique

Reproductive toxicity is common after total body irradiation (TBI) and has major quality of life implications for patients. In that context, this is the first report of gonadal-sparing volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) TBI, successfully delivered in a boy and a girl with aplastic anemia. Both patients' VMAT TBI plans demonstrated improved gonadal sparing versus simulated conventional 2-dimensional (2D) approach (mean testes dose, 0.45 Gy VMAT vs 0.72 Gy 2D; mean ovary dose, 0.64 Gy VMAT vs 1.47 Gy 2D). Planning target volume coverage was also improved for both cases with the VMAT plan versus conventional 2D plan (2 Gy D90% vs 1.9 Gy D90%, respectively). Given these dosimetric advantages, the present study can serve as a proof-of-concept for further prospective studies evaluating this technique for wider applications in populations receiving TBI.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation: A feasibility study using Pinnacle3 treatment planning system and Elekta Agility™ linac

A study was undertaken to explore the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for total body irradiation (TBI). Five patient plans were created in Pinnacle3 using nine 6 MV photon dynamic arcs. A dose of 12 Gy in six fractions was prescribed. The planning target volume (PTV) was split into four subsections for the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The head and chest beams were optimized together, followed by the abdomen and pelvis beams. The last stage of the planning process involved turning all beams on and performing a final optimization to achieve a clinically acceptable plan. Beam isocenters were shifted by 3 or 5 mm in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions to simulate the effect of setup errors on the dose distribution. Treatment plan verification consisted of ArcCheck measurements compared to calculated doses using a global 3%/3 mm gamma analysis. All five patient plans achieved the planning aim of delivering 12 Gy to at least 90% of the target. The mean dose in the PTV was 12.7 Gy. Mean lung dose was restricted to 8 Gy, and a dose reduction of up to 40% for organs such as the liver and kidneys proved feasible. The VMAT technique was found to be sensitive to patient setup errors particularly in the superior-inferior direction. The dose predicted by the planning system agreed with measured doses and had an average pass rate of 99.2% for all arcs. VMAT was found to be a viable treatment technique for total body irradiation.

Verification of junction dose between VMAT arcs of total body irradiation using a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK phantom

A volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach to total body irradiation (TBI) has recently been introduced at our institution. The planning target volume (PTV) is divided into separate sub-volumes, each being treated with 2 arcs with their own isocentre. Pre-treatment quality assurance of beams is performed on a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK diode array. Measurement of junction regions between VMAT arcs with separate isocentres has previously been performed with point dose ionization chamber measurements, or with films. Translations of the ArcCHECK with respect to a known distance between the adjacent isocentres of two arcs, which are repeated with the ArcCHECK in an inverted position, allows the recording of a junction dose map. A 3%/3 mm global gamma analysis (10% threshold) pass rate for arc junctions were comparable to their component arcs. Dose maps of junction regions between adjacent arcs with different isocentres can be readily measured on a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK diode array.