A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Intensity-modulated proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated ARC therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A long-term, multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Data evaluating the impact of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) on survival among nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients are limited. This study aims to elucidate the survival benefits and toxicity profiles of IMPT compared to modern photon therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), over an extended follow-up period.

METHODS

We analyzed data from NPC patients recorded in the Chang Gung Research Database. This analysis focused on individuals who received definitive radiotherapy, either IMPT or VMAT therapy, from 2016 to 2021. Patients with distant metastasis or concurrent other malignancies were excluded. We performed 1:1 matching based on stage, year of diagnosis, and age (± 10 years). Oncological outcomes and toxicities were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. For sensitivity analysis, we employed inverse probability of treatment weighting and additional 1:2 matching.

RESULTS

Out of a 1,202 NPC patients' cohort, 276 were selected from a subset of 294 who received IMPT and matched with an equivalent number of patients receiving VMAT. IMPT was associated with improved oncological outcomes after matching, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.15-0.62) for all-cause mortality and an aHR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99) for disease recurrence. Additionally, IMPT was linked to a reduced incidence of feeding tube placement, with an aHR of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.55). Competing risk and sensitivity analyses corroborated these trends, though the significance for disease recurrence was not consistent.

CONCLUSION

IMPT was associated with significantly better overall survival outcomes and a lower incidence of dysphagia compared to VMAT in NPC patients. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Current Status and Future Directions of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma

The growing interest in proton therapy (PT) in recent decades is justified by the evidence that protons dose distribution allows maximal dose release at the tumor depth followed by sharp distal dose fall-off. But, in the holistic management of head and neck cancer (HNC), limiting the potential of PT to a mere dosimetric advantage appears reductive. Indeed, the precise targeting of PT may help evaluate the effectiveness of de-escalation strategies, especially for patients with human papillomavirus associated-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Furthermore, PT could have potentially greater immunogenic effects than conventional photon therapy, possibly enhancing both the radiotherapy (RT) capability to activate anti-tumor immune response and the effectiveness of immunotherapy drugs. Based on these premises, the aim of the present paper is to conduct a narrative review reporting the safety and efficacy of PT compared to photon RT focusing on NPC and OPC. We also provide a snapshot of ongoing clinical trials comparing PT with photon RT for these two clinical scenarios. Finally, we discuss new insights that may further develop clinical research on PT for HNC.

Quality of life in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving IMRT vs IMPT: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients may experience symptom distress and depression during and after radiation therapy, which negatively impacts quality of life (QOL). We sought to identify trajectories of symptom distress, depression, social support, and QOL in patients with NPC receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

METHODS

A multicenter prospective longitudinal study recruited NPC patients from two leading medical centers in Taiwan. The 121 NPC patients were followed from before RT (T0), at 4 weeks after beginning RT (T1), at 6 weeks of RT or the end of treatment (T2), and at 4 weeks post-RT (T3). Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify the factors related to QOL.

RESULTS

Patients' symptom distress and depression increased from T0, peaked at T2, and decreased at T3. Physical-QOL and psychosocial-QOL decreased from T0 to T2, then increased by T3. Patients who had early-stage cancer, received a lower RT dose, had less symptom distress, and had less depression were more likely to have better QOL. Greater physical-QOL was associated with IMPT receipt, higher education level, early cancer stage, lower radiation dose, less symptom distress, and less depression. Patients who had good physical performance, received a lower radiation dose, had less symptom distress, and had less depression were more likely to have better psychosocial-QOL.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose, symptom distress, and depression were the most important factors affecting QOL in patients with NPC. Understanding the factors associated with the trajectory of QOL can guide care during radiation treatment.

An Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes and Associated Factors in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Cancer Center in the United Arab Emirates

Background and objective Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents a complex epidemiological pattern influenced by demographic characteristics, risk factors such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and smoking. Understanding the clinical profile and optimizing treatment strategies for NPC requires comprehensive analyses of these factors. In light of this, this study aimed to analyze the epidemiological patterns, histological characteristics, and treatment outcomes of NPC patients diagnosed and treated at a single center from 2016 to 2023. Materials and methods This retrospective study was conducted at Tawam Hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), focusing on patients diagnosed with NPC. It involved the analysis of patient age distribution to identify epidemiological patterns, histological examination to classify NPC types according to WHO guidelines, and evaluation of treatment outcomes based on induction chemotherapy regimens and concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocols. The effectiveness of various chemotherapy combinations, particularly cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (Cis+5FU), was assessed alongside the integration of advanced radiotherapy techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Results In this study of 41 NPC patients, the age distribution varied widely, ranging from 10 to 74 years, with a mean age of >40 years. There was a significant male predominance (82.93%). Most patients were non-smokers (68.29%) and did not consume alcohol (92.68%), and there was a high prevalence of EBV positivity (100%). At diagnosis, 80.49% had no metastases. The primary treatment was chemotherapy induction, with a 73.17% uptake and a 92.68% completion rate, leading to a 65.85% complete response (CR) rate. No significant association was found between smoking status and treatment response (p=0.7657). Pathologically, non-keratinizing undifferentiated squamous carcinoma was the most common variant (75.61%). The Cis+5FU regimen was the most frequently employed method (56.67%), associated with a 76.47% CR rate. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 87.80% of patients, with the weekly Cis regimen being the most used one (56.09%), resulting in a significant CR rate. Combining radiation therapy with concurrent and induction chemotherapy yielded high CR rates (RT+cCT: 66.66%, RT+cCT+iCT: 80%). Survival analysis revealed the highest 36-month survival rate (46.43%) in the RT+cCT+iCT group, suggesting a potential benefit from incorporating induction chemotherapy into the treatment regimen. Conclusions This study illustrates the impact of demographic variables, EBV infection, and smoking on the development and treatment outcomes of NPC. It points to the success of customized chemotherapy and advanced radiotherapy strategies. Yet, it is limited by its retrospective nature and single-center focus, and hence we recommend multicentric studies to broaden the applicability of the results and improve NPC treatment approaches for varied patient groups.

Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams?

PURPOSE

Noncoplanar plans (NCPs) are commonly used for proton treatment of bilateral head and neck (HN) malignancies. NCP requires additional verification setup imaging between beams to correct residual errors of robotic couch motion, which increases imaging dose and total treatment time. This study compared the quality and robustness of NCPs with those of coplanar plans (CPs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Under an IRB-approved study, CPs were created retrospectively for 10 bilateral HN patients previously treated with NCPs maintaining identical beam geometry of the original plan but excluding couch rotations. Plan robustness to the inter-fractional variation (IV) of both plans was evaluated through the Dose Volume Histograms (DVH) of weekly quality assurance CT (QACT) sets (39 total). In addition, delivery efficiency for both plans was compared using total treatment time (TTT) and beam-on time (BOT).

RESULTS

No significant differences in plan quality were observed in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage (D95) or organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (p > 0.4 for all CTVs and OARs). No significant advantage of NCPs in the robustness to IV was found over CP, either. Changes in D95 of QA plans showed a linear correlation (slope = 1.006, R2  > 0.99) between NCP and CP for three CTV data points (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) in each QA plan (117 data points for 39 QA plans). NCPs showed significantly higher beam delivery time than CPs for TTT (539 ± 50 vs. 897 ± 142 s; p < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed for BOT.

CONCLUSION

NCPs are not more robust to IV than CPs when treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams. CPs showed plan quality and robustness similar to NCPs while reduced treatment time (∼6 min). This suggests that CPs may be a more efficient planning technique for bilateral HN cancer proton therapy.

Current Radiotherapy Considerations for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Radiotherapy is the primary treatment modality for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Successful curative treatment requires optimal radiotherapy planning and precise beam delivery that maximizes locoregional control while minimizing treatment-related side effects. In this article, we highlight considerations in target delineation, radiation dose, and the adoption of technological advances with the aim of optimizing the benefits of radiotherapy in NPC patients.

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Epithelial Associated Malignancies: Exploring Pathologies and Current Treatments

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of eight known herpesviruses with the potential to infect humans. Globally, it is estimated that between 90-95% of the population has been infected with EBV. EBV is an oncogenic virus that has been strongly linked to various epithelial malignancies such as nasopharyngeal and gastric cancer. Recent evidence suggests a link between EBV and breast cancer. Additionally, there are other, rarer cancers with weaker evidence linking them to EBV. In this review, we discuss the currently known epithelial malignancies associated with EBV. Additionally, we discuss and establish which treatments and therapies are most recommended for each cancer associated with EBV.

Immunotherapy and Modern Radiotherapy Technique for Older Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancer is concurrent chemoradiation or postoperative irradiation with or without chemotherapy. Surgery may not be an option for older patients (70 years old or above) due to multiple co-morbidities and frailty. Additionally, the standard chemotherapy of cisplatin may not be ideal for those patients due to oto- and nephrotoxicity. Though carboplatin is a reasonable alternative for cisplatin in patients with a pre-existing hearing deficit or renal dysfunction, its efficacy may be inferior to cisplatin for head and neck cancer. In addition, concurrent chemoradiation is frequently associated with grade 3-4 mucositis and hematologic toxicity leading to poor tolerance among older cancer patients. Thus, a new algorithm needs to be developed to provide optimal local control while minimizing toxicity for this vulnerable group of patients. Recently, immunotherapy with check point inhibitors (CPI) has attracted much attention due to the high prevalence of program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in head and neck cancer. In patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, CPI has proven to be superior to conventional chemotherapy for salvage. Those with a high PD-L1 expression defined as 50% or above or a high tumor proportion score (TPS) may have an excellent response to CPI. This selected group of patients may be candidates for CPI combined with modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated image-guided radiotherapy (IM-IGRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) or proton therapy if available, which allow for the sparing of critical structures, such as the salivary glands, oral cavity, cochlea, larynx and pharyngeal muscles, to improve the patients' quality of life. In addition, normal organs that are frequently sensitive to immunotherapy, such as the thyroid and lungs, are spared with modern radiotherapy techniques. In fit or carefully selected frail patients, a hypofractionated schedule may be considered to reduce the need for daily transportation. We propose a protocol combining CPI and modern radiotherapy techniques for older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who are not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and have a high TPS. Prospective studies should be performed to verify this hypothesis.

Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges

Simple Summary

Proton therapy is a promising type of radiation therapy used to destroy tumor cells. It has the potential to further improve the outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer since it allows to minimize the radiation dose to vital structures around the tumor, leading to less toxicity. This paper describes the current experience worldwide with proton therapy in head and neck cancer.

Abstract

Proton therapy (PT) is a promising development in radiation oncology, with the potential to further improve outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). By utilizing the finite range of protons, healthy tissue can be spared from beam exit doses that would otherwise be irradiated with photon-based treatments. Current evidence on PT for HNSCC is limited to comparative dosimetric analyses and retrospective single-institution series. As a consequence, the recognized indications for the reimbursement of PT remain scarce in most countries. Nevertheless, approximately 100 PT centers are in operation worldwide, and initial experiences for HNSCC are being reported. This review aims to summarize the results of the early clinical experience with PT for HNSCC and the challenges that are currently faced.

Inequality in Accessibility of Proton Therapy for Cancers and Its Economic Determinants: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Cancer is a leading cause of death in the world, and the estimated new cancer cases were 19 million and the estimated cancer deaths were around 10 million worldwide in 2020. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising treatment for cancers; however, only few patients with cancer received PT due to limited number of PT centers worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Methods and Results

Cross-sectional country level data were collected from publicly available information. Lorenz curves and Gini coefficient were used to assess the inequality in accessing to PT, and zero-inflated Poisson models were used to investigate the determinants of number of PT facilities in each country. The Gini coefficients were 0.96 for PT centers and 0.96 for PT chambers, which indicated high level of inequality. Total GDP had a significant impact on whether a country had a practical PT center, whereas total GDP and GDP per capita had significant impacts on the number of PT centers.

Conclusion

Extremely high inequality exists in accessibility of PT centers among all countries in the world. Economic development was the most important factor determining the adoption of PT; thus, with the growth in global economics, more PT centers can be expected in near future.