1
|
Takagawa Y, Suzuki M, Seto I, Azami Y, Machida M, Takayama K, Sulaiman NS, Nakasato T, Kikuchi Y, Murakami M, Honda M, Teranishi Y, Kono K. Proton beam reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer patients with prior pelvic irradiation. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:379-386. [PMID: 38604182 PMCID: PMC11115468 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to report the feasibility of proton beam reirradiation for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with prior pelvic irradiation. The study population included patients who were treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) for LRRC between 2008 and December 2019 in our institution. Those who had a history of distant metastases of LRRC, with or without treatment, before reirradiation, were excluded. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Ten patients were included in the present study. The median follow-up period was 28.7 months, and the median total dose of prior radiotherapy (RT) was 50 Gy (range, 30 Gy-74.8 Gy). The median time from prior RT to reirradiation was 31.5 months (range, 8.1-96.6 months), and the median reirradiation dose was 72 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (range, 56-77 Gy). The 1-year/2-year OS, PFS and LC rates were 100%/60.0%, 20.0%/10.0% and 70.0%/58.3%, respectively, with a median survival time of 26.0 months. Seven patients developed a Grade 1 acute radiation dermatitis, and no Grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity was recorded. Grade ≥ 3 late toxicity was recorded in only one patient, who had developed a colostomy due to radiation-related intestinal bleeding. Reirradiation using PBT for LRRC patients who had previously undergone pelvic irradiation was feasible. However, the indications for PBT reirradiation for LRRC patients need to be considered carefully due to the risk of severe late GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Takagawa
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Ichiro Seto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yusuke Azami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masanori Machida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kanako Takayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Nor Shazrina Sulaiman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Nakasato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kikuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michitaka Honda
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yasushi Teranishi
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koji Kono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isabelle Choi J, Wojcieszynski A, Amos RA, Giap H, Apisarnthanarax S, Ashman JB, Anand A, Perles LA, Williamson T, Ramkumar S, Molitoris J, Simone CB, Chuong MD. PTCOG Gastrointestinal Subcommittee Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancies Consensus Statement. Int J Part Ther 2024; 11:100019. [PMID: 38757077 PMCID: PMC11095104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiotherapy delivery in the definitive management of lower gastrointestinal (LGI) tract malignancies is associated with substantial risk of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, dermatologic, and hematologic toxicities. Advanced radiation therapy techniques such as proton beam therapy (PBT) offer optimal dosimetric sparing of critical organs at risk, achieving a more favorable therapeutic ratio compared with photon therapy. Materials and Methods The international Particle Therapy Cooperative Group GI Subcommittee conducted a systematic literature review, from which consensus recommendations were developed on the application of PBT for LGI malignancies. Results Eleven recommendations on clinical indications for which PBT should be considered are presented with supporting literature, and each recommendation was assessed for level of evidence and strength of recommendation. Detailed technical guidelines pertaining to simulation, treatment planning and delivery, and image guidance are also provided. Conclusion PBT may be of significant value in select patients with LGI malignancies. Additional clinical data are needed to further elucidate the potential benefits of PBT for patients with anal cancer and rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Richard A. Amos
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Huan Giap
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Smith Apisarnthanarax
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Aman Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Luis A. Perles
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Jason Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael D. Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mori S, Bhattacharyya T, Furuichi W, Tohyama N, Nomoto A, Shinoto M, Takiyama H, Yamada S. Comparison of dosimetries of carbon-ion pencil beam scanning, proton pencil beam scanning and volumetric modulated arc therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023; 64:162-170. [PMID: 36403118 PMCID: PMC9855328 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
We compared the dose distributions of carbon-ion pencil beam scanning (C-PBS), proton pencil beam scanning (P-PBS) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for locally recurrent rectal cancer. The C-PBS treatment planning computed tomography (CT) data sets of 10 locally recurrent rectal cancer cases were randomly selected. Three treatment plans were created using identical prescribed doses. The beam angles for C-PBS and P-PBS were identical. Dosimetry, including the dose received by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) (D95%), dose to the 2 cc receiving the maximum dose (D2cc), organ at risk (OAR) volume receiving > 15Gy (V15) and > 30Gy (V30), was evaluated. Statistical significance was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean PTV-D95% values were > 95% of the volume for P-PBS and C-PBS, whereas that for VMAT was 94.3%. However, PTV-D95% values in P-PBS and VMAT were < 95% in five and two cases, respectively, due to the OAR dose reduction. V30 and V15 to the rectum/intestine for C-PBS (V30 = 4.2 ± 3.2 cc, V15 = 13.8 ± 10.6 cc) and P-PBS (V30 = 7.3 ± 5.6 cc, V15 = 21.3 ± 13.5 cc) were significantly lower than those for VMAT (V30 = 17.1 ± 10.6 cc, V15 = 55.2 ± 28.6 cc). Bladder-V30 values with P-PBS/C-PBS (3.9 ± 4.8 Gy(RBE)/3.0 ± 4.0 Gy(RBE)) were significantly lower than those with VMAT (7.9 ± 8.1 Gy). C-PBS provided superior dose conformation and lower OAR doses compared with P-PBS and VMAT. C-PBS may be the best choice for cases in which VMAT and P-PBS cannot satisfy dose constraints. C-PBS could be another choice for cases in which VMAT and P-PBS cannot satisfy dose constraints, thereby avoiding surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichiro Mori
- Corresponding author. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Quantum Life and Medical Science Directorate, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, Inageku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan. Office: 81-43-251-2111; Fax: 81-43-284-0198; e-mail:
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, 14, MAR(E-W), DH Block (Newtown), Action Area I, Newtown, Kolkata, West Bengal 700160, India
| | - Wataru Furuichi
- Accelerator Engineering Corporation, Inage-Ku, Chiba, 263-0043, Japan
| | - Naoki Tohyama
- Division of Medical Physics, Tokyo Bay Makuhari Clinic for Advanced Imaging, Cancer Screening, and High-Precision Radiotherapy, Mihama-ku, Chiba, 261-0024m Japan
| | - Akihiro Nomoto
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Takiyama
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, QST Hospital, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Preoperative short-course radiation therapy with PROtons compared to photons in high-risk RECTal cancer (PRORECT): Initial dosimetric experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 39:100562. [PMID: 36582423 PMCID: PMC9792362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by full-dose systemic chemotherapy is an established treatment modality in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Until recently, SCRT has been exclusively delivered with photons. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may minimize acute toxicity, which in turn likely impacts favorably on the tolerability to subsequent chemotherapy. The aim of this study is a dosimetric comparison between SCRT with photons and protons in the randomized phase II trial PRORECT (NCT04525989). Materials and methods From June 2021 to June 2022, twenty consecutive patients with LARC have been treated according to study protocol. For each patient, both a VMAT and a PBT treatment plans have been generated and compared pairwise. Results Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis revealed that SCRT with protons significantly reduced radiation dose to pelvic organs at risk including bladder, bones, and bowel in comparison to SCRT with photons. Photon and proton treatment plans had equivalent conformity and homogeneity indexes. Conclusion Preoperative SCRT with protons offers a significant reduction of radiation dose to normal tissues compared with current photon-based radiotherapy technique. Demonstrated dosimetric advantages may translate into measurable clinical benefits in patients with LARC. Clinical implications of the dosimetric superiority of SCRT with protons will be presented in the coming reports from the PRORECT trial.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kobeissi JM, Simone CB, Hilal L, Wu AJ, Lin H, Crane CH, Hajj C. Proton Therapy in the Management of Luminal Gastrointestinal Cancers: Esophagus, Stomach, and Anorectum. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122877. [PMID: 35740544 PMCID: PMC9221464 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation treatment plays a major role in the management of luminal gastrointestinal cancers, mainly esophageal and anorectal cancers. There is a growing interest in the application of protons for gastrointestinal cancers, mainly owing to its dosimetric characteristics in decreasing dose to nearby organs at risk. We present here an up-to-date comprehensive review of the dosimetric and clinical literature on the use of proton therapy in the management of luminal gastrointestinal cancers. Abstract While the role of proton therapy in gastric cancer is marginal, its role in esophageal and anorectal cancers is expanding. In esophageal cancer, protons are superior in sparing the organs at risk, as shown by multiple dosimetric studies. Literature is conflicting regarding clinical significance, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that protons yield similar or improved oncologic outcomes to photons at a decreased toxicity cost. Similarly, protons have improved sparing of the organs at risk in anorectal cancers, but clinical data is much more limited to date, and toxicity benefits have not yet been shown clinically. Large, randomized trials are currently underway for both disease sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana M. Kobeissi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1007, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Lara Hilal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1007, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
| | - Christopher H. Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA; (A.J.W.); (C.H.C.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taunk N. The role of proton therapy in gynecological radiation oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:414-420. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is an external beam radiotherapy modality that offers potentially similar efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with photon radiotherapy due to little to no exit dose of radiation beyond the intended target. Improvements in radiotherapy from two-dimensional, to three-dimensional, to intensity-modulated radiation therapy have offered comparable to improved efficacy of radiation therapy with progressive reductions in toxicity. Proton beam therapy may offer further improvements, with multiple dosimetric studies demonstrating potential reductions in exposure of normal tissue to radiation, particularly bowel and bone marrow. Proton beam therapy offers avenues for dose escalation or re-irradiation, which were previously not feasible with photon radiotherapy. Although early clinical data generally demonstrate safety, feasibility, and efficacy in a few series, prospective clinical trials are limited and needed to better define who might benefit from proton therapy. In this review, we discuss the history, dosimetry, available clinical data, and technical needs to deliver high-quality proton therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chuter R, Glassborow E, Speight R, Clarke M, Murray L, Radhakrishna G, Lavin V, Aspin L, Aldred M, Gregory S, Richardson J, Handley J. A treatment planning comparison of photon stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and proton beam therapy for the re-irradiation of pelvic cancer recurrence. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:78-83. [PMID: 35243036 PMCID: PMC8881531 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who experience a pelvic cancer recurrence in or near a region that received initial radiotherapy, typically have few options for treatment. Organs at risk (OAR) have often reached their dose constraint limits leaving minimal dose remaining for standard re-irradiation (reRT). However, photon based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been utilised for reRT with promising initial results although meeting OAR constraints can be challenging. Proton beam therapy (PBT) could offer an advantage. MATERIALS AND METHODS SABR plans used for treatment for ten pelvic reRT patients were dosimetrically compared to PBT plans retrospectively planned using the same CT and contour data. PBT plans were created to match the CTV dose coverage of SABR treatment plans with V100% ≥95%. An 'as low as reasonably achievable' approach was taken to OAR tolerances with consideration of OAR dose from the initial radiation (using equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). RESULTS Dosimetric comparison of relevant OAR statistics showed a decrease in OAR dose using PBT over SABR in all patients, with equivalent target coverage. The largest statistically significant reduction was seen for the colon D0.5 cm3 with a median reduction from 13.1 Gy to 5.9 Gy. There were statistically significant dose reductions in the median dose to small bowel, sacral plexus and cauda equina. CONCLUSION PBT has the potential for significant dose reductions for OARs in the pelvic reRT setting compared to SABR. However, it remains unclear if the magnitude of these OAR dose reductions will translate into clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Chuter
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Heath, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - E. Glassborow
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - R. Speight
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - M. Clarke
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - L. Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G. Radhakrishna
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - V. Lavin
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - L. Aspin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - M Aldred
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - S Gregory
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - J. Richardson
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Heath, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - J. Handley
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rønde HS, Kallehauge JF, Kronborg CJS, Nyvang L, Rekstad BL, Hanekamp BA, Appelt AL, Guren MG, Spindler KLS. Intensity modulated proton therapy planning study for organ at risk sparing in rectal cancer re-irradiation. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1436-1439. [PMID: 34264785 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1953139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - J F Kallehauge
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - C J S Kronborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L Nyvang
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - B L Rekstad
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - B A Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - A L Appelt
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, and Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K L S Spindler
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Optimization of Field Design in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer with Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy: How Many Fields Are Needed to Account for Rectal Distension Uncertainty? Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100749. [PMID: 34646968 PMCID: PMC8498733 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Preoperative chemoradiation represents the standard of care in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Robustness is often compromised in the setting of proton beam therapy owing to the sensitivity of proton particles to tissue heterogeneity, such as with intestinal gas. The ideal beam arrangement to mitigate the anatomic uncertainty caused by intestinal gas is not well defined. Methods and Materials We developed pencil beam scanning plans using (1) 1-beam posteroanterior (PA) plans, (2) 2-beam with right and left posterior oblique (RPO and LPO) plans, (3) 3-beam with PA and opposed lateral plans, and (4) 5-beam with PA, RPO, LPO, and opposed lateral plans. We created 12 plans with robustness optimization and ran a total of 60 plan evaluations for varying degrees of intestinal gas distension to evaluate which plans would maintain clinical goals to the greatest degree. Results A single PA beam resulted in considerable loss of target coverage to the clinical target volume prescribed 50 Gy (volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose [V100%] < 90%) with rectal distension ≥3 cm in diameter in the short axis. In contrast, the other field designs maintained coverage with up to 5 cm of distension. On plans generated based on a 5-cm distended rectum with air medium, the 1-beam, 3-beam, and 5-beam arrangements resulted in loss of target coverage (V100% < 90%) with rectal contraction ≤3 cm, whereas the 2-beam arrangement maintained coverage to as low as 2 cm. On plans generated based on a 3-cm distension of the rectum, both the 2-beam and 3-beam arrangements maintained V100% > 90% even with collapsed rectum to as low as 1 cm, simulating a patient treatment scenario without any rectal gas. Conclusions A single PA beam should be avoided when using proton beam therapy for rectal cancer. RPO/LPO and PA/opposed lateral arrangements may both be considered; RPO/LPO is favored to reduce integral dose and avoid beams traversing the hips. In patients for whom the plan CT has rectal distension of ≥3 cm, resimulation or strategies to reduce intestinal gas should be strongly considered.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fok M, Toh S, Easow J, Fowler H, Clifford R, Parsons J, Vimalachandran D. Proton beam therapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101638. [PMID: 34340196 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Locally advanced rectal cancer is often treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Radiotherapy carries significant risk of toxicity to organs at risk (OAR). Proton beam therapy (PBT) has demonstrated to be effective in other cancers, delivering equivalent dosimetric radiation but with the benefit of improved sparing of OAR. This review compares dosimetric irradiation of OAR and oncological outcomes for PBT versus conventional photon-based radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS An electronic literature search was performed for studies with comparative cohorts receiving proton beam therapy and photon-based radiotherapy for rectal cancer. RESULTS Eight articles with a total of 127 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was significantly less irradiated small bowel with PBT compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (MD -17.01, CI [-24.06, -9.96], p < 0.00001 and MD -6.96, CI [-12.99, -0.94], p = 0.02, respectively). Similar dosimetric results were observed for bladder and pelvic bone marrow. Three studies reported clinical and oncological results for PBT in recurrent rectal cancer with overall survival reported as 43 %, 68 % and 77.2 %, and one study in primary rectal cancer with 100 % disease free survival. CONCLUSION PBT treatment plans revealed significantly less irradiation of OAR for rectal cancer compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy. Trials for recurrent rectal cancer and PBT have shown promising results. There are currently no ongoing clinical trials for primary rectal cancer and PBT. More research is required to validate its potential role in dose escalation, higher complete response rate and organ preservation without increasing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Fok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Steven Toh
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Jeremy Easow
- School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Hayley Fowler
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Rachael Clifford
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK
| | - Jason Parsons
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Clatterbridge Road, Bebington, CH63 4JY, UK
| | - Dale Vimalachandran
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool, L3 9TA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koroulakis A, Molitoris J, Kaiser A, Hanna N, Bafford A, Jiang Y, Bentzen S, Regine WF. Reirradiation for Rectal Cancer Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy: A Single Institutional Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100595. [PMID: 33490730 PMCID: PMC7807140 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reirradiation for rectal cancer (RC) after prior pelvic radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be safe and effective. However, limited data exist for proton therapy (PT), including pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). We hypothesize that PT is safe and feasible for re-treatment and may allow for decreased toxicity and treatment escalation. Methods and materials A single-institution, retrospective, institutional review board–approved analysis of all patients with RC and prior pelvic RT receiving PBS-PT reirradiation was performed. Data on patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were collected. Local progression, progression-free survival, overall survival, and late grade >3 toxicity were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Twenty-eight patients (median follow-up: 28.6 months) received PBS-PT reirradiation between 2016 and 2019, including 18 patients with recurrent RC (median prior dose: 54.0 Gy) and 10 patients with de novo RC and variable prior RT. The median reirradiation dose was 44.4 Gy (range, 16.0-60.0 Gy; 21 of 28 twice daily), and 24 of 28 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Six underwent surgical resection. Three (10.7%) experienced grade 3 acute toxicities, and 1 did not complete RT owing to toxicity. Four (14.2%) had late grade <3 toxicity, including 1 grade 5 toxicity in a patient with a prior RT-related injury. The 1-year local progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 33.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5%-52.9%), 45.0% (95% CI, 26.2%-63.8%), and 81.8% (95% CI, 67.3%-96.3%), respectively. Conclusions This is the largest series using PT for reirradiation for RC and the first study using PBS-PT. Low acute toxicity rates and acceptable late toxicity support PBS-PT as an option for this high-risk patient population, with a need for continued follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Koroulakis
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jason Molitoris
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Adeel Kaiser
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nader Hanna
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrea Bafford
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Surgical Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yixing Jiang
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Søren Bentzen
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William F Regine
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith T, O'Cathail SM, Silverman S, Robinson M, Tsang Y, Harrison M, Hawkins MA. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicity. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1311-1319. [PMID: 33305093 PMCID: PMC7718547 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) but contemporaneous clinical data are limited. We aimed to evaluate the local control, toxicity, and survival outcomes in a cohort of patients previously treated with neoadjuvant pelvic radiation therapy for nonmetastatic locally recurrent rectal cancer, now treated with SBRT. Methods and Materials Inoperable rectal cancer patients with ≤3 sites of pelvic recurrence and >6 months since prior pelvic radiation therapy were identified from a prospective registry over 4 years. SBRT dose was 30 Gy in 5 fractions, daily or alternate days, using cumulative organ at risk dose constraints. Primary outcome was local control (LC). Secondary outcomes were progression free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and patient reported quality of life scores using the EQ visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) tool. Results Thirty patients (35 targets) were included. Median gross tumor volume size was 14.3 cm3. In addition, 27 of 30 (90%) previously received 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25 of 28 fractions, with 10% receiving an alternative prescription. All patients received the planned reirradiation SBRT dose. The median follow-up was 24.5 months (interquartile range, 17.8-28.8). The 1-year LC was 84.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.6-99) and a 2-year LC was 69% (95% CI, 51.8-91.9). The median progression free survival was 12.1 months (95% CI, 8.6-17.66), and median overall survival was 28.3 months (95% CI, 17.88-39.5 months). No patient experienced >G2 acute toxicity and only 1 patient experienced late G3 toxicity. Patient-reported QoL outcomes were improved at 3 months after SBRT (Δ EQ-VAS, +10 points, Wilcoxon signed-rank, P = .009). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that, for small volume pelvic disease relapses from rectal cancer, reirradiation with 30 Gy in 5 fractions is well tolerated and achieves an excellent balance between high local control rates with limited toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Smith
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Herefordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK
| | - Sean M O'Cathail
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sabrina Silverman
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Herefordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Yatman Tsang
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Herefordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London and University, London, England, UK.,College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
LaRiviere MJ, Santos PMG, Hill-Kayser CE, Metz JM. Proton Therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 33:989-1009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
15
|
Local Therapy Options for Recurrent Rectal and Anal Cancer: Current Strategies and New Directions. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00445-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
16
|
Novel Radiotherapy Technologies in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 34:29-43. [PMID: 31739949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, major technical advances in radiation therapy planning and delivery have made it possible to deliver higher doses to select high-risk volumes. This has helped to expand the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Whereas dose escalation was previously limited by the radiosensitivity of normal tissues within and adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, advances in target delineation, patient immobilization, treatment planning, and image-guided treatment delivery have greatly improved the therapeutic ratio. More conformal radiation modalities can offer further dose optimization to target volumes while sparing normal tissue from toxicity.
Collapse
|
17
|
Moningi S, Ludmir EB, Polamraju P, Williamson T, Melkun MM, Herman JD, Krishnan S, Koay EJ, Koong AC, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Taniguchi C, Das P, Holliday EB. Definitive hyperfractionated, accelerated proton reirradiation for patients with pelvic malignancies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:59-65. [PMID: 31517071 PMCID: PMC6734102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pelvic reirradiation (re-RT) presents challenges due to concerns for late toxicity to tissues-at-risk including pelvic bone marrow (PBM). We routinely utilize a hyperfractionated, accelerated re-RT for recurrent rectal or anal cancer in the setting of prior radiation. We hypothesized that proton beam radiation (PBR) is uniquely suited to limit doses to pelvic non-target tissues better than photon-based approaches. Materials and methods All patients who received hyperfractionated, accelerated PBR re-RT to the pelvis from 2007 to 2017 were identified. Re-RT was delivered twice daily with a 6 h minimum interfraction interval at 1.5 Gray Relative Biological Effectiveness (Gy(RBE)) per fraction to a total dose of 39-45 Gy(RBE). Concurrent chemotherapy was given to all patients. Comparison photon plans were generated for dosimetric analysis. Dosimetric parameters compared using a matched-pair analysis and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Survival analysis was performed Kaplan Meier curves. Results Fifteen patients were identified, with a median prior pelvic RT dose of 50.4 Gy (range 25-80 Gy). Median time between the initial RT and PBRT re-RT was 4.7 years (range 1.0-36.1 years). In comparison to corresponding photon re-RT plans, PBR re-RT plans had lower mean PBM dose, and lower volume of PBM getting 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.033, respectively).With median 13.9 months follow-up after PBR re-RT, five patients had developed local recurrences, and four patients had developed distant metastases. One-year overall survival following PBR re-RT was 67.5% and one-year progression free survival was 58.7%. No patients developed acute or late Grade 4 toxicity. Conclusion PBR re-RT affords improved sparing of PBM compared with photon-based re-RT. Clinically, PBR re-RT is well-tolerated. However, given modest control rates with definitive re-RT without subsequent surgical resection, a multidisciplinary approach should be favored in this setting when feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Moningi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Praveen Polamraju
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Marcella M Melkun
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Joseph D Herman
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Albert C Koong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Grace L Smith
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Prajnan Das
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poel R, Stuessi Lobmaier A, Andratschke N, Unkelbach J, Tanadini-Lang S, Guckenberger M, Foerster R. Dosimetric comparison of protons vs photons in re-irradiation of intracranial meningioma. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190113. [PMID: 31264474 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Re-irradiation of recurrent intracranial meningiomas represents a major challenge due to dose limits of critical structures and the necessity of sufficient dose coverage of the recurrent tumor for local control. The aim of this study was to investigate dosimetric differences between pencil beam scanning protons (PBS) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photons for intracranial re-irradiation of meningiomas. METHODS Nine patients who received an initial dose >50 Gy for intracranial meningioma and who were re-irradiated for recurrence were selected for plan comparison. A volumetric modulated arc therapy photon and a pencil beam scanning proton plan were generated (prescription dose: 15 × 3 Gy) based on the targets used in the re-irradiation treatment. RESULTS In all cases, where the cumulative dose exceeded 100 or 90 Gy, these high dose volumes were larger for the proton plans. The integral doses were significantly higher in all photon plans (reduction with protons: 48.6%, p < 0.01). In two cases (22.2%), organ at risk (OAR) sparing was superior with the proton plan. In one case (11.1%), the photon plan showed a dosimetric advantage. In the remaining six cases (66.7%), we found no clinically relevant differences in dose to the OARs. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric results of the accumulated dose for a re-irradiation with protons and with photons were very similar. The photon plans had a steeper dose falloff directly outside the target and were superior in minimizing the high dose volumes. The proton plans achieved a lower integral dose. Clinically relevant OAR sparing was extremely case specific. The optimal treatment modality should be assessed individually. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Dose sparing in re-irradiation of intracranial meningiomas with protons or photons is highly case specific and the optimal treatment modality needs to be assessed on an individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,2 Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherer Institute (PSI), Villingen, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Robert Foerster
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fokas E, Gambacorta MA, Rödel C, Valentini V. Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_47-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
20
|
Systematic assessment of clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for reirradiation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:21-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
21
|
Pelvic Reirradiation for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-017-0360-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
22
|
Li YR, Kirk M, Lin L. Proton Therapy for Vaginal Reirradiation. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:320-326. [PMID: 28989947 PMCID: PMC5627360 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-16-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary or recurrent gynecologic cancers in operable patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation are typically treated with surgery based on the risk of late toxicities historically associated with reirradiation. A number of studies have demonstrated that, compared with conventional radiation therapy (RT) using photons, proton therapy (PT) offers dosimetric advantages for patients with gynecologic cancers by reducing radiation dose to healthy tissues. Thereby, we expect that, in appropriately selected cases, PT may reduce long-term treatment-related morbidities without compromising treatment efficacy. Herein, we describe the treatment planning, technique, and long-term follow-up of a patient who was treated with PT for a primary vaginal carcinoma nearly 30 years after a prior course of pelvic RT. Using this case, we illustrate the utility and advantages of PT in the treatment of cancers that occur at less favorable sites, adjacent to normal structures with low radiation tolerance, or in paients with a history of prior irradiation. Additionally, we provide a brief discussion and review of literature of prior case series of pelvic reirradiation, illustrating the value of identifying treatment approaches that can reduce treatment-related morbidities, particularly late treatment toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Rose Li
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maura Kirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lilie Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Plastaras JP, Berman AT, Freedman GM. Special Cases for Proton Beam Radiotherapy: Re-irradiation, Lymphoma, and Breast Cancer. Semin Oncol 2014; 41:807-19. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|