1
|
Zavras AG, Acosta JR, Holmberg KJ, Semenza NC, Jayamohan HR, Cheng BC, Altman DT, Sauber RD. Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2024:S1529-9430(24)00267-5. [PMID: 38843960 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Clinical trials have demonstrated that cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an effective and safe alternative treatment to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disc disease in the appropriately indicated patient population. Various devices for CDA exist, differing in the level of device constraint. PURPOSE To investigate outcomes following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus CDA stratified based on the level of device constraint: Constrained, Semiconstrained, and Unconstrained. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE 2,932 CDA patients (979 Constrained, 1,214 Semiconstrained, 739 Unconstrained) and 2,601 ACDF patients from 41 studies that compared outcomes of patients undergoing CDA or ACDF at a single level at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes of interest included the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), index and adjacent segment reoperation rates, range of motion (ROM), high-grade heterotopic ossification (HO, McAfee Grades 3/4), and patient-reported outcomes (NDI/VAS). METHODS CDA devices were grouped based on the degrees of freedom (DoF) allowed by the device, as either Constrained (3 DoF), Semiconstrained (4 or 5 DoF), or Unconstrained (6 DoF). A random effects network meta-analysis was conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD) and log relative risk (RR) were used to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively. RESULTS Semiconstrained (p=.03) and Unconstrained CDA (p=.01) demonstrated a significantly lower risk for ASD than ACDF. All levels of CDA constraint demonstrated a significantly lower risk for subsequent adjacent segment surgery than ACDF (p<.001). Semiconstrained CDA also demonstrated a significantly lower risk for index level reoperation than both ACDF and Constrained CDA (p<.001). Unconstrained devices retained significantly greater ROM than both Constrained and Semiconstrained CDA (p<.001). As expected, all levels of device constraint retained significantly greater ROM than ACDF (p<.001). Constrained and Unconstrained devices both demonstrated significantly lower levels of disability on NDI than ACDF (p=.02). All levels of device constraint demonstrated significantly less neck pain than ACDF (p<.05), while Unconstrained CDA had significantly less arm pain than ACDF (p=.02) at final follow-up greater than 2 years. CONCLUSION Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, particularly the unconstrained and semiconstrained designs, appears to be more effective than ACDF in reducing the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and the need for further surgeries, while also allowing for greater range of motion and better patient-reported outcomes. Less constrained CDA conferred a lower risk for index level reoperation, while also retaining more range of motion than more constrained devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jonathan R Acosta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kyle J Holmberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas C Semenza
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Boyle C Cheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel T Altman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ryan D Sauber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortiz-Babilonia CD, Gupta A, Cartagena-Reyes MA, Xu AL, Raad M, Durand WM, Skolasky RL, Jain A. The Statistical Fragility of Trials Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:708-714. [PMID: 37368958 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE To assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative cervical pathology by using fragility indices. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA RCTs comparing these surgical approaches have shown that CDA may be equivalent or even superior to ACDF due to better preservation of normal spinal kinematics. MATERIALS AND METHODS RCTs reporting clinical outcomes after CDA versus ACDF for degenerative cervical disc disease were evaluated. Data for outcome measures were classified as continuous or dichotomous. Continuous outcomes included: Neck Disability Index, overall pain, neck pain, radicular arm pain, and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Dichotomous outcomes included: any adjacent segment disease (ASD), superior-level ASD, and inferior-level ASD. The fragility index (FI) and continuous FI (CFI) were determined for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The corresponding fragility quotient (FQ) and continuous FQ were calculated by dividing FI/CFI by sample size. RESULTS Twenty-five studies (78 outcome events) were included. Thirteen dichotomous events had a median FI of 7 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-10], and the median FQ was 0.043 (IQR: 0.035-0.066). Sixty-five continuous events had a median CFI of 14 (IQR: 9-22) and a median continuous FQ of 0.145 (IQR: 0.074-0.188). This indicates that, on average, altering the outcome of 4.3 patients out of 100 for the dichotomous outcomes and 14.5 out of 100 for continuous outcomes would reverse trial significance. Of the 13 dichotomous events that included a loss to follow-up data, 8 (61.5%) represented ≥7 patients lost. Of the 65 continuous events reporting the loss to follow-up data, 22 (33.8%) represented ≥14 patients lost. CONCLUSION RCTs comparing ACDF and CDA have fair to moderate statistical robustness and do not suffer from statistical fragility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos D Ortiz-Babilonia
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Puerto Rico, PR
| | - Arjun Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey, NJ
| | | | - Amy L Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Micheal Raad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Wesley M Durand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richard L Skolasky
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Amit Jain
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller AK, Zakko P, Park DK, Chang VW, Schultz L, Springer K, Hamilton TM, Abdulhak MM, Schwalb JM, Nerenz DR, Aleem IS, Khalil JG. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Database. Spine J 2024; 24:791-799. [PMID: 38110089 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are established surgical options for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, and cervical degenerative disc disease. However, current literature does not demonstrate a clear superiority between ACDF and CDA. PURPOSE To investigate procedural and patient-reported outcomes of ACDF and CDA among patients included in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) database. DESIGN Retrospective study of prospectively collected outcomes registry data. PATIENT SAMPLE Individuals within the MSSIC database presenting with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or cervical spondylosis refractory to typical conservative care undergoing primary ACDF or CDA from January 4, 2016, to November 5, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES Perioperative measures (including surgery length, length of stay, return to OR, any complications), patient-reported functional outcomes at 2-year follow-up (including return to work, patient satisfaction, PROMIS, EQ-5D, mJOA). METHODS Patients undergoing ACDF were matched 4:1 with those undergoing CDA; propensity analysis performed on operative levels (1- and 2- level procedures), presenting condition, demographics, and comorbidities. Initial comparisons performed with univariate testing and multivariate analysis performed with Poisson generalized estimating equation models clustering on hospital. RESULTS A total of 2,208 patients with ACDF and 552 patients with CDA were included. Baseline demographics were similar, with younger patients undergoing CDA (45.6 vs 48.6 years; p<.001). Myelopathy was more frequent in ACDF patients (30% vs 25%; p=.015). CDA was more frequently planned as an outpatient procedure. Length of stay was increased in ACDF (1.3 vs 1.0 days; p<.001). Functional outcomes were similar, with comparable proportions of patients meeting minimal clinically important difference thresholds in neck pain, arm pain, PROMIS, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. After multivariate regression, no significant differences were seen in surgical or functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates similar outcomes for those undergoing ACDF and CDA at 2 years. Previous meta-analyses of CDA clinical trial data adhere to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria required by clinical studies; this registry data provides "real world" clinical outcomes reflecting current practices for ACDF and CDA patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex K Miller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health East William Beaumont University Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.
| | - Philip Zakko
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health East William Beaumont University Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA
| | - Daniel K Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health East William Beaumont University Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 586 Pioneer Dr., Rochester, MI 48309, USA
| | - Victor W Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Lonni Schultz
- Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative, 3A Ford Pl., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Kylie Springer
- Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative, 3A Ford Pl., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Travis M Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Muwaffak M Abdulhak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative, 3A Ford Pl., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Jason M Schwalb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative, 3A Ford Pl., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - David R Nerenz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative, 3A Ford Pl., Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Ilyas S Aleem
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jad G Khalil
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health East William Beaumont University Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd., Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 586 Pioneer Dr., Rochester, MI 48309, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Núñez JH, Escudero B, Montenegro JD, Jiménez-Jiménez MJ, Martínez-Peña J, Surroca M, Bosch-García D. [Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2024; 68:T168-T178. [PMID: 37995814 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study. RESULTS Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91° was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty. CONCLUSION In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Núñez
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain; Unidad de Columna, Artro-Esport, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - B Escudero
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain
| | - J D Montenegro
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain
| | - M J Jiménez-Jiménez
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain
| | - J Martínez-Peña
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain
| | - M Surroca
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain
| | - D Bosch-García
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), Spain; Grup Traumatologic de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Núñez JH, Escudero B, Montenegro JD, Jiménez-Jiménez MJ, Martínez-Peña J, Surroca M, Bosch-García D. Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2024; 68:168-178. [PMID: 37423383 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study. RESULTS Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty. CONCLUSION In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Núñez
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España; Unidad de Columna, Artro-Esport, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, España.
| | - B Escudero
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España
| | - J D Montenegro
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España
| | - M J Jiménez-Jiménez
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España
| | - J Martínez-Peña
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España
| | - M Surroca
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España
| | - D Bosch-García
- Unidad de Columna Vertebral, Servicio de Traumatología y Cirugía Ortopédica, Hospital Universitario de Mutua Terrassa, Tarrasa (Barcelona), España; Grup Traumatologic de Catalunya, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Satin AM, Rogers-LaVanne MP, Guyer RD, Zigler JE, Blumenthal SL, Shellock JL, Ohnmeiss DD, Derman PB. Letter to the editor regarding, "Long-term results of the NECK trial-implanting a disc prosthesis after cervical anterior discectomy cannot prevent adjacent segment disease: five-year clinical follow-up of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial" by Goedmakers et al. Spine J 2024; 24:387-388. [PMID: 38246700 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Satin
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA.
| | | | - Richard D Guyer
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA; Center for Disc Replacement, Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Jack E Zigler
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA; Center for Disc Replacement, Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Scott L Blumenthal
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA; Center for Disc Replacement, Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Jessica L Shellock
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA; Center for Disc Replacement, Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Donna D Ohnmeiss
- Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Peter B Derman
- Texas Back Institute, 6020 W. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Plano, TX, 75093 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zavras AG, Federico VP, Butler AJ, Nolte MT, Dandu N, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Relative Efficacy of Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty Devices and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Pathology: A Network Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2024; 14:322-346. [PMID: 37099726 PMCID: PMC10676167 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231172982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. OBJECTIVE This study sought to compare patient-reported outcomes, success, complications, and radiographic outcomes directly and indirectly between different cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) devices and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS Patients of prospective randomized controlled trials of 1-level cervical TDA with a minimum of 2 years follow up were identified in the literature. A frequentist network meta-analysis model was used to compare each outcome across the different TDA devices included and ACDF using the mixed effect sizes. RESULTS 15 studies were included for quantitative analysis, reporting the outcomes of 2643 patients with an average follow-up was 67.3 months (range: 24-120 months), 1417 of whom underwent TDA and 1226 of whom underwent ACDF. Nine TDA devices were compared to ACDF, including the Bryan, Discover, Kineflex, M6, Mobi-C, PCM, Prestige ST, ProDisc-C, and Secure-C cervical prostheses. Several devices outperformed ACDF for certain outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm, Physical Component Score of the Short-Form Health Survey (SF PCS), neurological success, satisfaction, index-level secondary surgical interventions (SSI), and adjacent level surgeries. Cumulative ranking of each intervention assessed demonstrated the highest performance with the M6 prosthesis (P = .70), followed by Secure-C (P = .67), PCM (P = .57), Prestige ST (P = .57), ProDisc-C (P = .54), Mobi-C (P = .53), Bryan (P = .49), Kineflex (P = .49), Discover (P = .39), and ACDF (P = .14). CONCLUSION Cervical TDA was found to be superior on most outcomes assessed in the literature of high-quality clinical trials. While most devices demonstrated similar outcomes, certain prostheses such as the M6 were found to outperform others across several outcomes assessed. These findings suggest that the restoration of near-normal cervical kinematics may lead to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G. Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent P. Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander J. Butler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Navya Dandu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W. Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sasso WR, Ye J, Foley DP, Vinayek S, Sasso RC. 20-year Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:1-6. [PMID: 37644726 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. OBJECTIVE To compare clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) at 20 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Concern for adjacent-level disease after ACDF prompted the development of CDA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy were randomized to either BRYAN CDA or ACDF for a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial. At 20 years, patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain, neck disability index (NDI), and reoperation rates, were analyzed. RESULTS Follow-up rate was 91.3%. Both groups showed significantly better NDI, VAS arm pain, and VAS neck pain scores at 20 years versus preoperative scores. Comparing CDA versus ACDF, there was no difference at 20 years in mean scores for NDI [11.1 (SD 14.1) vs. 19.9 (SD 17.2), P =0.087], mean VAS arm pain [0.9 (SD 2.4) vs. 2.3 (SD 2.8), P =0.095], or mean VAS neck pain [1.2 (SD 2.5) vs. 2.9 (3.3), P =0.073]. There was a significant difference between CDA versus ACDF groups in the change in VAS neck pain score between 10 and 20 years [respectively, -0.4 (SD 2.5) vs. 1.5 (SD 2.5), P =0.030]. Reoperations were reported in 41.7% of ACDF patients and 10.0% of CDA patients ( P =0.039). CONCLUSIONS Both CDA and ACDF are effective in treating cervical radiculopathy with sustained improvement in NDI, VAS neck and VAS arm pain at 20 years. CDA demonstrates lower reoperation rates than ACDF. There were no failures of the arthroplasty device requiring reoperation at the index level. The symptomatic nonunion rate of ACDF was 4.2% at 20 years. Despite a higher reoperation rate in the CDA group versus ACDF group, there was no difference in the 20-year NDI, VAS Neck, and VAS arm pain scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willa R Sasso
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - David P Foley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Foreman M, Patel A, Nguyen A, Foster D, Orriols A, Lucke-Wold B. Management Considerations for Total Intervertebral Disc Replacement. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:125-136. [PMID: 37777178 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
The burden of disease regarding lumbar and cervical spine pain is a long-standing, pervasive problem within medicine that has yet to be resolved. Specifically, neck and back pain are associated with chronic pain, disability, and exorbitant health care use worldwide, which have only been exacerbated by the increase in overall life years and chronic disease. Traditionally, patients with significant pain and disability secondary to disease of either the cervical or lumbar spine are treated via fusion or discectomy. Although these interventions have proved curative in the short-term, numerous longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of traditional management have reported severe impairment of normal spinal range of motion, as well as postoperative complications, including neurologic injury, radiculopathy, osteolysis, subsidence, and infection, paired with less than desirable reoperation rates. Consequently, there is a call for innovation and improvement in the treatment of lumbar and cervical spine pain, which may be answered by a modern technique known as intervertebral disc arthroplasty, or total disc replacement (TDR). Thus, this review aims to describe the management strategy of TDR and to explore updated considerations for its use in practice, both to help guide clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Foreman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
| | - Aashay Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Devon Foster
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Adrienne Orriols
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chughtai M, Rajan P, Emara AK, Grits D, Ng M, Talpur W, Pelle DW, Savage JW, Mroz T. Perioperative outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: no difference between orthopaedic and neurologic surgeons. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2023; 9:390-397. [PMID: 38196728 PMCID: PMC10772662 DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Given differences in residency training background, there has been increasing interest in characterizing differential outcomes between orthopaedic surgeons (OS) and neurosurgeons (NS) with regards to outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). This study aimed to assess if there were differences in perioperative outcomes of CDA between OS and NS. Methods Patients who underwent a single-level CDA between 2012 and 2019 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology codes. The patients were subsequently stratified into those who underwent CDA with OS versus NS, and propensity score-matched to adjust for differences in patient characteristics. Differences were assessed in medical and surgical complications, as well as operative time and healthcare utilization parameters [reoperations, readmissions, and lengths-of-stay (LOS)]. Results A total of 2,148 patients were identified (NS: n=1,395; OS: n=753). After 1:1 propensity score matching (n=741 each), there were no differences in characteristics between patients who underwent CDA by OS versus NS (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in any of the medical or surgical complications between the two groups (P>0.05 for each). There was a significant difference in the operative time between NS and OS (103.7±36.18 vs. 98.75±36.69 minutes; P=0.009). There were no significant differences in readmissions, reoperations, or LOS between the two groups (P>0.05 for each). Conclusions There were no differences in medical or surgical complications, as well as in reoperations, readmissions, and LOS in patients who underwent a single-level CDA between OS and NS. There was a statistically significant shorter operative time of four minutes for OS as compared to NS, which is unlikely to have clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morad Chughtai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Prashant Rajan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ahmed K. Emara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Grits
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mitchell Ng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Wasif Talpur
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dominic W. Pelle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason W. Savage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Mroz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Muralidharan A, Gong D, Piche JD, Al-Saidi N, Hey HWD, Aleem I. Multilevel Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: Moving Beyond Two Levels. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:363-368. [PMID: 37684714 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) is well-studied for 1-level and 2-level cervical pathology. There is an increasing trend towards its utilization for greater than 2-level disease as an alternative to the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The number of high-level, prospective studies or randomized trials regarding multilevel CDA is limited but continues to grow as the procedure gains popularity. In appropriately indicated patients with multilevel disease caused by disk herniations or spondylosis without extensive facet arthropathy, CDA shows promising results. Multilevel CDA should be avoided in patients with prior spinal trauma, significant degenerative spondylolisthesis with translation, arthrodesis without mobility, severely incompetent facet joints, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, or kyphotic deformity. With overall similar risk profiles to ACDF but lower theoretical rates of pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease, multilevel CDA has been shown to preserve, or perhaps even increase, preoperative cervical range of motion. There are negligible differences in postoperative neck and arm pain, VAS scores, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, and Neck Disability Index scores when comparing multilevel CDA and ACDF. Despite current indications for multilevel CDA largely being based on single and 2-level data, careful patient selection is critical. Expansion of indications can be expected as literature continues to emerge regarding outcomes and complications in multilevel CDA, as well as with improvements in prosthesis design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Davin Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Joshua D Piche
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Neil Al-Saidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Ilyas Aleem
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim LJY, Mazur MD, Dailey AT. Mid-term and Long-term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:339-355. [PMID: 37735768 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare mid-term to long-term outcomes of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA After ACDF to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease, the loss of motion at the index level due to fusion may accelerate adjacent-level disk degeneration. CDA was developed to preserve motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Early-term to mid-term clinical outcomes from RCTs suggest noninferiority of CDA compared with ACDF, but it remains unclear whether CDA yields better mid-term to long-term outcomes than ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs with at least 60 months of follow-up. The risk ratio or standardized mean difference (and 95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS Eighteen reports of 14 RCTs published in 2014-2023 were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the CDA group had a significantly greater improvement in neurological success and Neck Disability Index than the ACDF group. The ACDF group exhibited a significantly better improvement in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary than the CDA group. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the CDA group at 60- and 84-month follow-ups; at 120-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the overall rate of secondary surgical procedures was significantly lower in the CDA group, we did not observe any significant difference at 60-month follow-up between the CDA and ACDF group and appreciated statistically significant lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery at 84-month and 108- to 120-month follow-up. The rate of adverse events and the neck and arm pain scores in the CDA group were not significantly different from those of the ACDF group. CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 5- to 10-year follow-up data, CDA resulted in significantly better neurological success and Neck Disability Index scores and lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, secondary surgical procedures, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery than ACDF. ACDF resulted in improved Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores. However, the CDA and ACDF groups did not exhibit significant differences in overall changes in neck and arm pain scores or rates of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo J Y Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schupper AJ, Boylan AJ, Houten JK. Is Cervical Disk Arthroplasty a Suitable Alternative to Treat Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy? Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:356-362. [PMID: 37684716 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systemic review. OBJECTIVE To understand the role of cervical disk arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) most frequently involves decompression and fusion, but stiffness introduced by the fusion and adjacent segment degeneration remain problems that can result in significant morbidity. Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) is a newer procedure that has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for the management of cervical spine degenerative disk disease, but it has not been traditionally considered as a treatment option for DCM and the use for this indication has not been extensively studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using a search strategy to query all relevant articles on the use of cervical disk arthroplasty in the setting of cervical myelopathy over a 20-year period (2004-2023). This review examines the literature to assess our current understanding of the appropriateness, safety, and value of CDA in the treatment of DCM. RESULTS A total of 844 patients received CDA across the 14 studies that met inclusion criteria, with an average of 60.3±40.4 patients per study (range: 11-152 subjects). Featured studies included 5 (35.7%) prospective studies, of which 2 were randomized. All studies had primary outcome measures of disability and/or pain scores, with the Japanese Orthopedic Association myelopathy score and neck disability index as the most commonly assessed. Four (26.7%) studies compared arthroplasty with arthrodesis. Safety of CDA for DCM was found in all studies with improvement in clinical outcome measurements. CONCLUSION Cervical disk arthroplasty appears to be a safe and effective surgical option in the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Further study is needed to assess if arthroplasty provides clinical improvement in DCM of comparable magnitude and durability as traditional fusion strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Schupper
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nguyen AQ, Credille K, Saifi C. Short-term and Long-term Complications of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:404-410. [PMID: 37752635 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A narrative review. OBJECTIVE This review discusses the short and long-term complications associated with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA CDA is a safe and effective motion-sparing alternative to fusion for the treatment of cervical disc pathology in patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Although CDA offers advantages over fusion within a narrower set of indications, it introduces new technical challenges and potential complications. METHODS A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, was conducted from January 2005 to August 2023 to identify published studies and clinical trials evaluating cervical disc replacement complications and outcomes. RESULTS Short-term complications are primarily related to surgical approach and include dysphagia reported as high as ~70%, laryngeal nerve injury ~0%-1.25%, Horner syndrome ~0.06%, hematoma ~0.01%, gross device extrusion ~0.3%, whereas long-term complications include adjacent segment disease reported at ~3.8%, osteolysis ~44%-64%, heterotopic ossification ~7.3%-69.2%, implant failure ~3.3%-3.7%, and implant wear, which varies depending on design. CONCLUSIONS Approaches for mitigating complications broadly include meticulous dissection, intraoperative techniques, and diligent postoperative follow-up. This review emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding and management of complications to enhance the safety, reproducibility, and success of CDA. As CDA continues to evolve, there remains a critical need for ongoing research to delve deeper into evaluating risk for complications and long-term patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Q Nguyen
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Divi SN, Plantz MA, Tegethoff J, Su BW. Current and Expanded Indications for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Beyond the FDA IDE Studies. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:375-385. [PMID: 37691166 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
The widespread success of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has led to an interest in expanding indications beyond those outlined in the initial Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption studies. Some of these off-label indications currently include 3-level and 4-level CDA, hybrid constructs with adjacent segment anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or corpectomy constructs, pre-existing kyphosis, revision of a failed anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to a CDA, CDA in the setting of significant degenerative disc disease and/or facet joint arthropathy, CDA for congenital cervical stenosis, and CDA in the presence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. This review article will summarize the current literature pertaining to the aforementioned indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srikanth N Divi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Mark A Plantz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Jason Tegethoff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Brian W Su
- California Orthopedics & Spine, Novato, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fransen P, Noriega D, Chatzisotiriou A, Pointillart V. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Baguera C prosthesis: clinical and radiological results of a 10-year follow-up study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:3533-3539. [PMID: 37422768 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07833-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the long-term safety, mobility and complications of cervical total disc arthroplasty with the Baguera®C prosthesis over 10 years. METHODS We included 91 patients treated by arthroplasty for cervical degenerative disc disease. A total of 113 prostheses were implanted (50 one-level, 44 two-level and 19 hybrid constructs). They were assessed for complications, clinically, with NDI and SF-12 questionnaires and by independent radiologists for ROM, HO, disc height and adjacent level degeneration. RESULTS No spontaneous migration, loss of fixation, subsidence, vascular complication or dislocation were observed. The reoperation rate was 1%. About 82.7% of the patients were pain free. About 9.9% were taking occasional grade I painkillers. Motricity and sensitivity were preserved in 98.8% and 96.3%. The NDI showed an average functional disability of 17.58%, 26% lower than preoperatively. The SF-12 scores were close to normal health. The average ROM at the treated level was 7.4°. Motion was preserved in 86.6%. Lack of motion was observed in 13.4%. Grades II and III H0 were present in 53.7% and 31.7%, respectively, Grade IV was present in 13.4%. Motion was preserved in 100% of the grades 0-III. The preoperative adjacent level disc height of 4.3 mm remained stable during all the follow-ups at 4.4 mm and 4.2 mm, respectively, at 5 and 10 years. CONCLUSIONS After 10 years, cervical arthroplasty with the Baguera®C prosthesis presents excellent safety and functional results and low complications. Motion was preserved in 86.6%, with a 7.4° ROM. Although common, HO did not hinder motion. Adjacent disc height preservation confirms some adjacent level degeneration protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Fransen
- CHIREC Delta, Brussels, Belgium.
- IM2S, Clinique Médico-chirurgicale orthopédique de Monaco, 10 Avenue d'Ostende, 98000, Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
| | - D Noriega
- St Luc Clinic Thessaloniki, Thessaloníki, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Satin AM, Rogers-LaVanne MP, Derman PB. Cervical Disk Arthroplasty and Range of Motion at 7 Years: Impact on Adjacent Level Degeneration. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:83-89. [PMID: 36823704 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of data collected in a prospective, randomized, noninferiority Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) clinical trial. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of range of motion (ROM) following single-level cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) on the development of radiographic adjacent level degeneration (ALD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The rationale for CDA is that maintenance of index-level ROM will decrease adjacent level stresses and ultimately reduce the development of ALD compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. However, little information is available on the impact of hypermobility on the development of ALD after CDA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Radiographic assessments were evaluated for index-level flexion-extension ROM and ALD. Continuous data was assessed using 1-way analysis of variance. The relationship between ALD progression and ROM was evaluated using χ 2 tests. The α was set at 0.05. RESULTS More ALD progression was observed after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion than CDA ( P =0.002 at the superior and P =0.049 at the inferior level). Furthermore, there was an association between ALD progression and ROM ( P =0.014 at the superior level and P =0.050 at the inferior level) where patients with mid-ROM after CDA experienced the lowest frequency of ALD progression at the superior and inferior levels. Patients with the lowest and highest ROM after CDA experienced a greater increase in ALD score at the inferior level ( P =0.046). Sex and age were associated with ROM groups ( P =0.001 and 0.023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS While maintenance of index-level ROM is protective after CDA, patients with the highest ROM after CDA have similar rates of ALD progression to the lowest ROM and greater increases in ALD compared with mid-ROM after CDA. High ROM after CDA may contribute to ALD progression.
Collapse
|
18
|
Qi M, Xu C, Liu Y, Cao P, Wang X, Chen H, Yuan W. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: a 10-year follow-up study. Spine J 2023; 23:361-368. [PMID: 36481680 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The theoretical advantage of cervical disc arthroplasty includes preserved motion at the cervical level, which may reduce degeneration of the adjacent segments. The long-term follow-up results are still controversial. PURPOSE The present study aimed to retrospectively study the long-term efficacy and complications of cervical disc arthroplasty using a single commercially-available device in a single center. STUDY DESIGN This was a propensity-score matched cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE This study enrolled 148 single-level cervical degenerative disease patients from January 2009 to March 2012. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 39 patients remained in the ACDF or ACDR groups. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were neurological functions (Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores), radiographic evaluations (cervical curvature, operative segment range of motion, degenerative condition of adjacent segments, heterotopic ossification (HO) of the surgical segment), and complications. METHODS NDI and JOA scores were used to evaluate patient neurological functions. Cervical curvature (C2-C7 Cobb angle) and operative segment range of motion (ROM) were compared between the two groups. Grading criteria for osteophyte formation were used to evaluate the degenerative condition of adjacent segments. HO after ACDR was graded according to the McAfee grading method. RESULTS The average follow-up time was 119.3 ±17.2 months. Satisfactory improvements in neurological function were obtained for both the ACDR and ACDF groups. There were no significant differences in VAS or NDI scores between the two groups. In the ACDR group, the ROM of the operative segment increased from 6.7 ±4.3° before the operation to 8.9 ±3.5° on the second day after the operation (p<.001). The ROM of the operative segment was 8.1 ±4.0° at the 1-year follow-up, 7.2 ±3.6° at the 2-year follow-up, 5.7 ±4.5° at the 5-year follow-up and 4.3 ±3.9° at the last follow-up. ASD was more likely to develop in the caudal adjacent segments and progressed with the follow-up time. At the last follow-up, HO was present in 27 patients (69.23%), while high-grade HO (McAfee scores III and IV) was detected in 6 patients (15.38%). CONCLUSIONS Through nearly 10 years of follow-up, ACDR was as effective as ACDF for treating single-level degenerative cervical disc disease. However, HO and the role of ACDR in the protection of ASD remains to be further observed and followed up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Qi
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003
| | - Chen Xu
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003
| | - Yang Liu
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003
| | - Peng Cao
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003
| | - Xinwei Wang
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003
| | - Huajiang Chen
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003.
| | - Wen Yuan
- Spine Center, Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415th Fengyang Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, 200003.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tu TH, Wang CY, Chen YC, Wu JC. Multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty: a review of optimal surgical management and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:372-381. [PMID: 36681966 DOI: 10.3171/2022.11.spine22880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has been recognized as a popular option for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy caused by disc problems that require surgery. There have been prospective randomized controlled trials comparing CDA to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for 1- and 2-level disc herniations. However, the indications for CDA have been extended beyond the strict criteria of these clinical trials after widespread real-world experiences in the past decade. This article provides a bibliometric analysis with a review of the literature to understand the current trends of clinical practice and research on CDA. METHODS The PubMed database was searched using the keywords pertaining to CDA in human studies that were published before August 2022. Analyses of the bibliometrics, including the types of papers, levels of evidence, countries, and the number of disc levels involved were conducted. Moreover, a systematic review of the contents with the emphasis on the current practice of multilevel CDA and complex cervical disc problems was performed. RESULTS A total of 957 articles published during the span of 22 years were analyzed. Nearly one-quarter of the articles (232, 24.2%) were categorized as level I evidence, and 33.0% were categorized as levels I or II. These studies clearly demonstrated the viability and effectiveness of CDA regarding clinical and radiological outcomes, including neurological improvement, maintenance, and preservation of segmental mobility with relatively low risks for several years postoperation. Also, there have been more papers published during the last decade focusing on multilevel CDA and fewer involving the comparison of ACDF. Overall, there was a clustering of CDA papers published from the US and East Asian countries. Based on substantial clinical data of CDA for 1- and 2-level disc diseases, the practice and research of CDA show a trend toward multilevel and complex disease conditions. CONCLUSIONS CDA is an established surgical management procedure for 1- and 2-level cervical disc herniation and spondylosis. The success of motion preservation by CDA-with low rates of complications-has outscored ACDF in patients without deformity. For more than 2-level disc diseases, the surgery shows a trend toward multiple CDA or hybrid ACDF-CDA according to individual evaluation for each level of degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Hsi Tu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Ching-Ying Wang
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Yu-Chun Chen
- 2Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
- 4Big Data Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jau-Ching Wu
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- 3School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Watts CR, Haapala JL. Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparison of 30-Day Population Comorbidities and Perioperative Complications Using 6 Years of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File Data. World Neurosurg 2023; 170:e79-e114. [PMID: 36283651 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File data from 2014 through 2019 were used to compare 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical total disc replacement (cTDR) with respect to: patient demographics, comorbidities, adverse events, and 30-day morbidity rates. METHODS One- and 2-level ACDF and cTDR patients were identified by current procedural terminology codes. Demographics, comorbidities, and adverse events were summarized. Unmatched cohorts were compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables, Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables, and 30-day morbidity using inverse probability of treatment weighted log-binomial regression. RESULTS American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2014 through 2019 Participant Use File datasets represent 4,862,497 unique patients, identifying 13,347 1-level, 6933 2-level ACDF, 3114 1-level, and 862 2-level cTDR patient cohorts. Statistically significant differences between cohorts are extensive: age, sex, race, admission status, patient origin, discharge disposition, emergent surgery, surgical specialty, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, wound class, operative time, hospital LOS, BMI, functional status, smoking, diabetes, dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, dialysis, cancer, steroid use, anemia, bleeding disorders, systemic sepsis, and number of concurrent comorbid conditions. Inverse probability of treatment weighted log-binomial models, demonstrated increased risk of deep venous thrombosis/thrombophlebitis, pulmonary embolism, deep incisional surgical site infection, pneumonia, and unplanned return to operating room associated with ACDF while increased risk of cerebral vascular accident/stroke with neurological deficit and myocardial infarction associated with cTDR. The composite complications outcome favors cTDR over ACDF for 30-day morbidity. No mortalities occurred within the cTDR cohort. CONCLUSIONS Adjusting for demographics and comorbidities; ACDF has a higher average risk of adverse event. When ACDF and cTDR are equipoise, consideration for cTDR may be indicated in populations with higher rates of comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Watts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Park Nicollet, Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA; Health Partners Institute, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takami T, Hara T, Hara M, Inui T, Ito K, Koyanagi I, Mizuno J, Mizuno M, Nakase H, Shimokawa N, Sugawara T, Suzuki S, Takahashi T, Takayasu M, Tani S, Hida K, Kim P, Arai H. Safety and Validity of Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-level Cervical Disc Disease: Initial Two-year Follow-up of the Prospective Observational Post-marketing Surveillance Study for Japanese Patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2022; 62:489-501. [PMID: 36223947 PMCID: PMC9726179 DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) using cervical artificial disc (CAD) has the advantage of maintaining the range of motion (ROM) at the surgical level, subsequently reducing the postoperative risk of adjacent disc disease. Following the approval for the clinical use in Japan, a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was conducted for two different types of CAD, namely, Mobi-C (metal-on-plastic design) and Prestige LP (metal-on-metal design). The objective of this prospective observational multicenter study was to analyze the first 2-year surgical results of the PMS study of 1-level ACDR in Japan. A total of 54 patients were registered (Mobi-C, n = 24, MC group; Prestige LP, n = 30, PLP group). Preoperative neurological assessment revealed radiculopathy in 31 patients (57.4%) and myelopathy in 15 patients (27.8%). Preoperative radiological assessment classified the disease category as disc herniation in 15 patients (27.8%), osteophyte in 6 patients (11.1%), and both in 33 patients (61.1%). The postoperative follow-up rates at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after ACDR were 92.6%, 87.0%, 83.3%, and 79.6%, respectively. In both groups, patients' neurological condition improved significantly after surgery. Radiographic assessment revealed loss of mobility at the surgical level in 9.5% of patients in the MC group and in 9.1% of patients in the PLP group. No secondary surgeries at the initial surgical level and no serious adverse events were observed in either group. The present results suggest that 1-level ACDR is safe, although medium- to long-term follow-up is mandatory to further verify the validity of ACDR for Japanese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Takami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University
| | | | - Masahito Hara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aichi Medical University
| | | | - Kiyoshi Ito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine
| | - Izumi Koyanagi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido Neurosurgical Memorial Hospital
| | - Junichi Mizuno
- Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Center, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital
| | | | | | | | - Taku Sugawara
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Shinsuke Suzuki
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Sendai East Neurosurgical Hospital
| | | | | | - Satoshi Tani
- Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Center, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital
| | - Kazutoshi Hida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Azabu Neurosurgical Hospital
| | - Phyo Kim
- Neurologic Surgery, Symphony Clinic
| | - Hajime Arai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zavras AG, Dandu N, Nolte MT, Butler AJ, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Sullivan TB, Colman MW. Segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:579-587. [PMID: 35453108 DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.spine2281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As an alternative procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) facilitates direct neural decompression and disc height restoration while also preserving cervical spine kinematics. To date, few studies have reported long-term functional outcomes after TDA. This paper reports the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis that investigated how segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative level is maintained with long-term follow-up. METHODS PubMed and MEDLINE were queried for all published studies pertaining to cervical TDA. The methodology for screening adhered strictly to the PRISMA guidelines. All English-language prospective studies that reported ROM preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and/or at long-term follow-up of 5 years or more were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 to test data for statistical heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. The mean differences (MDs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS Of the 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 8 reported the long-term outcomes of 944 patients with an average (range) follow-up of 99.86 (60-142) months and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between preoperative segmental ROM and segmental ROM at 1-year follow-up (MD 0.91°, 95% CI -1.25° to 3.07°, p = 0.410). After the exclusion of 1 study from the comparison between preoperative and 1-year ROM owing to significant statistical heterogeneity according to the sensitivity analysis, ROM significantly improved at 1 year postoperatively (MD 1.92°, 95% CI 1.04°-2.79°, p < 0.001). However, at longer-term follow-up, the authors again found no difference with preoperative segmental ROM, and no study was excluded on the basis of the results of further sensitivity analysis (MD -0.22°, 95% CI -1.69° to -1.23°, p = 0.760). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in ROM from 1 year postoperatively to final long-term follow-up (MD -0.77°, 95% CI -1.29° to -0.24°, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Segmental ROM was found to initially improve beyond preoperative values for as long as 1 year postoperatively, but then ROM deteriorated back to values consistent with preoperative motion at long-term follow-up. Although additional studies with further longitudinal follow-up are needed, these findings further support the notion that cervical TDA may successfully maintain physiological spinal kinematics over the long term.
Collapse
|
23
|
Yeni YN, Azad S, Oravec D, Schildcrout A, Basheer A, Bey MJ, Bartol SW, Chang V. Intervertebral kinematics during neck motion 6.5 years after fusion and artificial disc replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2022; 99:105756. [PMID: 36063742 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement for surgical treatment of cervical spine degeneration was introduced with the notion that motion-preserving approaches would prevent development of adjacent segment disease. Though clinical outcomes favor arthroplasty over the commonly used anterior cervical discectomy with fusion approach, clinical studies confirming the biomechanical basis of these results are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare intervertebral kinematics between arthroplasty and fusion patients 6.5 years post-surgery during physiological motion of the neck. METHODS Using a biplane dynamic X-ray system, computed tomography imaging and model based tracking algorithms, three dimensional intervertebral kinematics were measured during neck axial rotation and extension in 14 patients treated for cervical radiculopathy with fusion (n = 8) or arthroplasty (n = 6). The measurements were performed at 2-year (baseline) and 6.5 year post-surgical time points, with the main interest being in the interaction between surgery types and time points. 3 translations and 3 rotations were investigated for the index (C5C6), and upper- (C4C5) and lower adjacent levels (C6C7). FINDINGS Surgery-time interaction was significant for axial rotation (P < 0.04) and flexion-extension rotation (P < 0.005) in C4C5 during neck axial rotation, left-right translation (P < 0.04) in C5C6 and anterior-posterior translation in C6C7 (P < 0.04) during neck extension. In contrast with the expectations, axial rotation and flexion-extension decreased in C4C5 during neck rotation and anterior-posterior translation decreased in C6C7 during neck extension for fusion. INTERPRETATION The findings do not support the notion that adjacent segment motion increases after fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yener N Yeni
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Sherwin Azad
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA; School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Oravec
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Schildcrout
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Azam Basheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Michael J Bey
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Stephen W Bartol
- Bone and Joint Center, Department of Orthopedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Victor Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Núñez JH, Escudero B, Omiste I, Martínez-Peñas J, Surroca M, Alonzo-González F, Bosch-García D. Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2022:10.1007/s00590-022-03365-1. [PMID: 35986813 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03365-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Compare the outcomes of randomized clinical trials of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. METHODS Nine randomized clinical trials were selected. The clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes were analyzed, including functional and pain scores, range of motion, adjacent segment degeneration, adverse events, and need for reoperation. RESULTS 2664 patients were included in the study. Pooled results indicated that the CDA group had a significantly higher overall success rate (p < 0.001), a higher improvement in the neck disability index (NDI) (p = 0.002), less VAS arm pain (p = 0.01), and better health questionnaire SF-36 physical component (p = 0.01) than ACDF group. Likewise, the pooled results indicated a significantly higher motion rate (p < 0.001), less adjacent syndrome (p < 0.05), and a lower percentage of reoperation (p < 0.001) in the CDA group. There were no significant differences between the CDA and ACDF groups in the neck pain scale (p = 0.11), the health questionnaire SF-36 mental component (p = 0.10), and in adverse events (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION In long-term follow-up, CDA showed a better overall success rate, better improvement in NDI, less VAS arm pain, better health questionnaire SF-36 physical component, a higher motion rate, less adjacent syndrome, and less reoperation rate than ACDF. No significant differences were found in the neck pain scale, SF-36 mental component, and in adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge H Núñez
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
- Spine Unit, Artro-Esport, Centro Médico Teknon, Carrer de Vilana, 12, 08022, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Berta Escudero
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Omiste
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Martínez-Peñas
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Surroca
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Alonzo-González
- Hospital Ceibal de Accidentes Del Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social, Cuidad de Guatemala, Guatemala
| | - David Bosch-García
- Spine Unit, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrassa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
- Grup Traumatologic de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Letter to the Editor Regarding “The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials”. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:457-458. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
26
|
Wellington IJ, Kia C, Coskun E, Torre BB, Antonacci CL, Mancini MR, Connors JP, Esmende SM, Makanji HS. Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9050227. [PMID: 35621505 PMCID: PMC9137579 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9050227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
While spinal disc pathology has traditionally been treated using fusion-based procedures, recent interest in motion-preserving disc arthroplasties has grown. Traditional spinal fusion is associated with loss of motion, alteration of native spine kinematics, and increased risks of adjacent segment disease. The motion conferred by disc arthroplasty is believed to combat these complications. While the first implant designs resulted in poor patient outcomes, recent advances in implant design and technology have shown promising radiographic and clinical outcomes when compared with traditional fusion. These results have led to a rapid increase in the utilization of disc arthroplasty, with rates of cervical arthroplasty nearly tripling over the course of 7 years. The purpose of this review was to discuss the evolution of implant design, the current implant designs utilized, and their associated outcomes. Although disc arthroplasty shows significant promise in addressing some of the drawbacks associated with fusion, it is not without its own risks. Osteolysis, implant migration, and the development of heterotopic ossification have all been associated with disc arthroplasty. As interest in these procedures grows, so does the interest in developing improved implant designs aimed at decreasing these adverse outcomes. Though they are still relatively new, cervical and lumbar disc arthroplasty are likely to become foundational methodologies for the treatment of disc pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J. Wellington
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Cameron Kia
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ergin Coskun
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Barrett B. Torre
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Christopher L. Antonacci
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Michael R. Mancini
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - John P. Connors
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06032, USA; (I.J.W.); (E.C.); (B.B.T.); (C.L.A.); (M.R.M.); (J.P.C.)
| | - Sean M. Esmende
- Department of Orthopedics, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, CT 06106, USA; (S.M.E.); (H.S.M.)
| | - Heeren S. Makanji
- Department of Orthopedics, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, CT 06106, USA; (S.M.E.); (H.S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carrera DA, Ricks CB. Catastrophic delayed cervical arthroplasty failure: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY: CASE LESSONS 2022; 3:CASE21731. [PMID: 36209405 PMCID: PMC9379625 DOI: 10.3171/case21731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is an increasingly used alternative to fusion for symptomatic cervical disc disease. While more studies have suggested favorability of CDR over fusion procedures, limited data exist regarding implant fatigability. Here, the authors present a unique and previously unreported failure of the M6-C prosthesis causing spinal cord injury. OBSERVATIONS A 49-year-old female with history of cervical degenerative disease and prior C4–7 M6-C arthroplasty presented 9 years later after a minor fall from standing. She endorsed bilateral hand numbness ascending to forearms and shoulders, with dysesthesias and weakness. Imaging showed fractured arthroplasty penetrating the spinal cord. Revision surgery found a ruptured arthroplasty annulus with metal piece piercing the spinal cord. Partial C4 and C5 corpectomy was performed to remove the integrated fins of the arthroplasty and inspect the cord and dura. This was reconstructed with a corpectomy cage and plate. The patient made an excellent recovery, with improvement in her weakness and resolution of her sensory symptoms. LESSONS Possibility of fatigue-related failures presenting years after implantation have only been infrequently reported but can be catastrophic for patients. The authors encourage further discussions in this area, increased counseling with patients, and recommend a patient registry to better document adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego A. Carrera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Christian B. Ricks
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zavras AG, Sullivan TB, Singh K, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system. Spine J 2022; 22:353-369. [PMID: 34419625 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) is an alternative procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion that facilitates neural decompression while both preserving motion of the spinal unit and decreasing the risk for degenerative changes at adjacent segments. However, due to its more recent introduction in clinical practice and low complication rates, the modes by which TDA may fail remain to be described. PURPOSE This study sought to identify the modes and frequencies of cervical TDA failure in order to propose a novel classification system. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort and systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent single or two-level TDA for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy at a single institution and in the literature of medium and large prospective studies. OUTCOME MEASURES Cervical TDA failure, defined as subsequent surgical intervention at the index segment. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent single or two-level TDA for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy at a single institution to identify the potential implant failure modes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective data in the literature was then performed to further supplement failure mode identification and to describe the rates at which the various failure types occurred. Statistical analysis included between-group comparisons of Non-Failed and Failed patients and frequencies of each failure type among Failed patients. RESULTS A retrospective review at our institution of 169 patients (201 levels) identified eight failures, for a failure rate of 4.7%. Additionally, seven patients were revised who had the primary surgery at an outside institution. The systematic review of 3976 patients (4525 levels) identified 165 (4.1%) additional failures. Using this data, six primary failure types were classified, with several subtypes. These include recurrent or persistent index-level stenosis (Type I); migration (Type II) presenting as gross extrusion (A) or endplate failure with subsidence/acute fracture (B); instability (Type III) due to mechanical loosening (A), septic loosening (B), or device fracture (C); device motion loss (Type IV) such as "locking" of the device in kyphosis; implantation error (Type V) due to malposition (A) or improper sizing (B); and wear (Type VI) either without osteolysis (A) or with wear-particle-induced osteolysis (B). Stenosis (Type I) was the most common mode of failure found both through retrospective review and in the literature. CONCLUSIONS Cervical TDA fails through six primary mechanisms. While rates of certain failures requiring subsequent surgical intervention are low, it is possible that these complications may become more prevalent upon further longitudinal observation. Thus, future application and validation of this classification system is warranted to evaluate how failure frequencies change over time and with larger patient samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Thomas Barrett Sullivan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Frank M Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Toci GR, Canseco JA, Patel PD, Divi SN, Goz V, Shenoy K, Sherman MB, Hilibrand AS, Donnally CJ. The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. World Neurosurg 2022; 160:e537-e548. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
30
|
Michalopoulos GD, Bhandarkar AR, Jarrah R, Yolcu YU, Alvi MA, Ghaith AK, Sebastian AS, Freedman BA, Bydon M. Hybrid surgery: a comparison of early postoperative outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 36:575-584. [PMID: 34715670 DOI: 10.3171/2021.7.spine21478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hybrid surgery (HS) is the combination of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) at different levels in the same operation. The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative variables, 30-day postoperative outcomes, and complications of HS in comparison with those of CDA and ACDF. METHODS The authors queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) registry for patients who underwent multilevel primary HS, CDA, and ACDF for degenerative disc disease from 2015 to 2019. The authors compared these three operations in terms of 30-day postoperative outcomes, specifically readmission and reoperation rates, discharge destination, and complications. RESULTS This analysis included 439 patients who underwent HS, 976 patients who underwent CDA, and 27,460 patients who underwent ACDF. Patients in the HS and CDA groups were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and myelopathy was less often the indication for surgery compared with patients who underwent ACDF. For the HS group, the unplanned readmission rate was 0.7%, index surgery-related reoperation rate was 0.3%, and nonroutine discharge rate was 2.1%. Major and minor complications were also rare, with rates of 0.2% for each. The mean length of stay in the HS group was 1.5 days. The association of HS with better outcomes in univariate analysis was not evident after adjustment for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS The authors found that HS was noninferior to ACDF and CDA in terms of early postoperative outcomes among patients treated for degenerative disc disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgos D Michalopoulos
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Archis R Bhandarkar
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,3Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; and
| | - Ryan Jarrah
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yagiz Ugur Yolcu
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mohammed Ali Alvi
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Abdul Karim Ghaith
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arjun S Sebastian
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brett A Freedman
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- 1Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.,2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Alvarez CE, Saal-Zapata G, Rodríguez-Varela R, Ginocchio F, Pacussich C. Safety and Effectiveness of the Flexible Cervical Implant: Preliminary Short-Term Clinical Results. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e122-e127. [PMID: 34687929 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Flexible Cervical Implant in 1- or 2-level cervical segments. METHODS Retrospective data collection was carried out on consecutive patients who underwent the implantation of the Flexible Cervical Implant in a local private health institution. Demographics, clinical pictures, magnetic resonance images, x-ray images, technical considerations, and postoperative clinical results were reviewed. RESULTS Twelve patients were treated with 15 implants. The mean age was 57.5 years (range 28-81), and 6 patients were males. The most common level was C5/C6 (7 cases). Radicular pain was the main symptom in all patients. Short-term postoperative clinical outcomes showed improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The median VAS score for radicular pain improved from 6 to 2 (P < 0.001), whereas the median NDI showed a significant improvement from 25 to 5 (P < 0.001). No implant-related complications were reported. The mean follow-up was 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed Flexible Cervical Implant was safe and effective in terms of morbidity and improvement in clinical outcomes. This new cervical artificial disk is promising, and further long-term clinical and radiologic follow-up is needed to determine its benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E Alvarez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clínica Alvarez, Miraflores, Lima, Perú.
| | - Giancarlo Saal-Zapata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, La Victoria, Lima, Perú
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
The first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) was issued in 2007. Since then, 8 more artificial discs have been granted FDA approval for single-level CTDR. Two of these have also been approved for 2-level CTDR. All devices are indicated for levels C3 to C7 for symptomatic patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy caused by disc herniation or spondylosis unresponsive to conservative management. Trials have shown noninferiority of CTDR compared with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in their overall success. Hybrid surgery and CTDR of 3 or more levels are not FDA approved.
Collapse
|
33
|
Nunley P, Schouwen KFV, Stone M. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Indications and Technique. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 32:419-424. [PMID: 34538468 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Cervical total disc replacement devices have been marketed in the United States (US) since 2007, with abundant level 1 evidence published on the treatment. Adherence to the strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and the surgical technique training of the US clinical trials remains the consistent and conservative approach to patient selection and implantation technique. However, patient selection and surgical technique remain debated among US surgeons as the published data and available cervical total disc replacements continue to grow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierce Nunley
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, 1500 Line Avenue, Suite 200, Shreveport, LA 71101, USA.
| | | | - Marcus Stone
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, 1500 Line Avenue, Suite 200, Shreveport, LA 71101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Price RL, Coric D, Ray WZ. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Complications and Complication Avoidance. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 32:473-481. [PMID: 34538473 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) has gained popularity over the last 2 decades. It is a motion-preserving option to ACDF and is becoming more popular with patients and surgeons alike. Understanding complications that are unique to CTDR is crucial to performing successful, durable surgery. Careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique are key to reducing complications associated with the surgery. Patient's should be followed closely after surgery with routine flexion/extension x-rays for early detection of any complications that may occur. Most complications can be observed with close follow-up. However, it is incumbent on the surgeon to recognize when revision surgery is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Price
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8057, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110, USA; Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Carolinas Neurosurgical and Spine Associates, 225 Baldwin Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
| | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8057, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Parish JM, Asher AM, Coric D. Adjacent-Segment Disease Following Spinal Arthroplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2021; 32:505-510. [PMID: 34538476 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Intuitively, the introduction of artificial discs into spinal surgery offered the promise of reducing the incidence of adjacent segment (AS) reoperation compared with fusion. Several early clinical studies reported nonstatistically significant differences in AS disease between total disc replacement and fusion. Given the relatively low rate of AS reoperation (∼1%-2% per year) following fusion, any appropriately powered study designed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference compared with arthroplasty would require thousands of patients and/or long-term follow-up (>5 years). Therefore, these differences only become apparent with large study size or meta-analyses and longer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Parish
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
| | - Anthony M Asher
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, 225 Baldwin Avenue, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA; Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wang H, Wang X, Liu H, Meng Y, Guo Y, Hong Y. Risk Factors for High-Grade Heterotopic Ossification After Total Disc Replacement: A Single-Center Experience of 394 Cases. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:852-861. [PMID: 34382657 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following total disc replacement (TDR). High-grade HO is a clinically relevant complication, however, only a few studies have evaluated risk factors for high-grade HO. OBJECTIVE To evaluate potential risk factors for HO and high-grade HO and their impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent TDR or hybrid surgery (HS) with Prestige-LP (Medtronic), Discover (Depuy), and Prodisc-C (Synthes). Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Visual Analogue Scale, and Neck Disability Index scores. Radiological variables, including preoperative ossification, global and segmental range of motion (ROM), HO, and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 394 patients were evaluated. HO and high-grade HO occurred in 67.77% and 11.17% patients, respectively. Preoperative ossification was significantly associated with the occurrence of HO (P < .001, OR: 3.507, 95%CI: 2.211-5.562) and high-grade HO (P = .019, OR: 2.176, 95%CI: 1.137-4.166). The ROM of replacement levels and C2-7 were significantly lower in the high-grade HO group compared to those without high-grade HO: (3.80° vs 10.18°, P < .001) and (42.81° vs 54.00°, P < .001), respectively. The incidence of ASD was significantly higher in patients with high-grade HO than those without high-grade HO (22.73% vs 11.14%, P = .048). CONCLUSION Preoperative ossification was identified as a potential risk factor for HO and high-grade HO. Patients with high-grade HO had limited ROM of replacement levels and the cervical spine and had a high incidence of ASD compared to those without high-grade HO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yang Meng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yingjun Guo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ying Hong
- Department of Anesthesia and Operation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim K, Hoffman G, Bae H, Redmond A, Hisey M, Nunley P, Jackson R, Tahernia D, Araghi A. Ten-Year Outcomes of 1- and 2-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty From the Mobi-C Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:497-505. [PMID: 33372218 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short- and mid-term studies have shown the effectiveness of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) to treat cervical disc degeneration. OBJECTIVE To report the 10-yr outcomes of a multicenter experience with cervical arthroplasty for 1- and 2-level pathology. METHODS This was a prospective study of patients treated with CDA at 1 or 2 contiguous levels using the Mobi-C® Cervical Disc (Zimmer Biomet). Following completion of the 7-yr Food and Drug Administration postapproval study, follow-up continued to 10 yr for consenting patients at 9 high-enrolling centers. Clinical and radiographic endpoints were collected out to 10 yr. RESULTS At 10 yr, patients continued to have significant improvement over baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI), neck and arm pain, neurologic function, and segmental range of motion (ROM). NDI and pain outcomes at 10 yr were significantly improved from 7 yr. Segmental and global ROM and sagittal alignment also were maintained from 7 to 10 yr. Clinically relevant adjacent segment pathology was not significantly different between 7 and 10 yr. The incidence of motion restricting heterotopic ossification at 10 yr was not significantly different from 7 yr for 1-level (30.7% vs 29.6%) or 2-level (41.7% vs 39.2%) patients. Only 2 subsequent surgeries were reported after 7 yr. CONCLUSION Our results through 10 yr were comparable to 7-yr outcomes, demonstrating that CDA with Mobi-C continues to be a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients with 1- or 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kee Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California
| | | | - Hyun Bae
- The Spine Institute, Santa Monica, California
| | | | | | | | - Robert Jackson
- Orange County Neurosurgical Associates, Laguna Hills, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Joaquim AF, Lee NJ, Riew KD. Revision Surgeries at the Index Level After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty - A Systematic Review. Neurospine 2021; 18:34-44. [PMID: 33819934 PMCID: PMC8021828 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040454.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To perform a systematic literature review on revision surgeries at the index level after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) failure.
Methods A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Prospective studies on patients who required a secondary surgery after CDA failure were included for analysis. The minimum follow-up for these studies was 5 years.
Results Out of 864 studies in the original search group, a total of 20 studies were included. From a total of 4,087 patients, 161 patients required a reoperation at the index level. A total of 170 surgeries were performed, as some patients required multiple surgeries. The most common secondary procedures were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (68%, N = 61) and posterior cervical fusion (15.5%, N = 14), followed by other reoperation (13.3%, N = 12). The associated outcomes for those who required a revision surgery were rarely mentioned in the included literature.
Conclusion The long-term revision rate at the index level of failed CDA surgery was 3.9%, with a minimum 5-year follow-up. ACDF was the most commonly performed procedure to salvage a failed CDA. Some patients who required a new surgery after CDA failure may require a more extensive salvage procedure and even subsequent surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan J Lee
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| | - K Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Divi SN, Reyes AA, Goyal DKC, Phillips FM, Zigler J. 2021 Position Statement From the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery on Cervical and Lumbar Disc Replacement. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:37-46. [PMID: 33900955 DOI: 10.14444/8004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory D Schroeder
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ariana A Reyes
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dhruv K C Goyal
- Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Frank M Phillips
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Virk S, Phillips F, Khan S, Qureshi S. A cross-sectional analysis of 1347 complications for cervical disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Spine J 2021; 21:265-272. [PMID: 32966907 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has increased in popularity over the past decade based on published outcomes from FDA IDE studies with narrowly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A low rate of complications was noted in these studies. The broader complication profile for CDR in widespread clinical practice has yet to be described. PURPOSE To outline the complications reported to the FDA regarding commonly used CDR products STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective database review PATIENT SAMPLE: Nationwide database of reported complications related to CDR products from patients across the country OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications related to CDR METHODS: We queried the MAUDE database and Alternative Summary Reporting (ASR) data files submitted between January 2005 to March 2020. The complications listed for seven FDA-approved CDR implants were analyzed. The entries in the databases were cataloged for complication type, date of entry, source of report, and whether the investigation was "complete". Reports that had too little information to extract relevant data were excluded. RESULTS There were 1,517 entries identified in the MAUDE database. After removal of duplicate entries and entries without sufficient information, there were 1,347 entries analyzed. The top five complications were (1) migration of implant (338 entries, 25.2%) (2) insertion problem/failure (312 entries, 23.3%) (3) neck pain (203 entries, 15.2%) (4) heterotopic ossification (108 entries, 8.1%) and (5) radiculopathy (90 entries, 8.1%). The number of analyzed implant-related MAUDE entries and most common implant-related complication for each implant was 209 entries for insertion problem/failure for Mobi-C; 158 entries for migration of implant for ProDisc-C; 154 entries for insertion problem/failure for Bryan cervical disc; 130 entries for migration of implant for Prestige cervical disc; 49 entries for migration of implant for PCM cervical disc; 12 entries for migration of implant for M6 and 10 entries for migration of implant for Secure-C. Only 263 entries (19.5%) were deemed "complete". Most entries were from the manufacturer/company representative/distributor (923 entries, 70%). There were no entries related to cervical disc replacement devices within the ASR data. CONCLUSIONS The MAUDE database highlights complications related to CDR implants that may not be emphasized in currently published studies. It is important to understand this broad complication profile for CDR to ensure safe utilization of this new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohrab Virk
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Northwell Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Great Neck, NY.
| | - Frank Phillips
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Safdar Khan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sheeraz Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lanman TH, CuÉllar JM. Restoration of Spinal Motion: Conversion of Anterior Cervical Fusion With Pseudarthrosis to Artificial Disc Replacement. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:483-487. [PMID: 32986567 DOI: 10.14444/7063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Describe the technique and outcomes of the conversion of prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with pseudarthrosis to an artificial disc replacement (ADR). METHODS Case report. Five patients completed the following pain and function questionnaires at baseline and postoperatively: visual analog pain scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), PROMIS Emotional Distress-Depression Short Form-4a (P-EDD), PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 6b (P-PI), and PROMIS Physical Function Short Form-10a (P-SF). Pseudarthrosis was diagnosed using computed tomography imaging of the cervical spine. The level of prior fusion with pseudarthrosis was remobilized after a standard anterior approach was made, and an artificial disc replacement was performed after revision discectomy. RESULTS The conversion of fusion to ADR was successful in all 5 patients without intraoperative or postoperative complication or the need to perform revision fusion. The average follow-up duration was 12.4 months (range 6-24months). VAS improved on average (median) from 6 (6.0) to 2 (2.2), NDI improved from 23 (21) to 15 (17), P-EDD 4a improved from 11 (11) to 4 (4), and P-PI and P-SF improved from 23 (22) to 16 (19) and from 37 (35) to 41 (39.5), respectively. Radiographic range of motion increased at the fusion conversion level from an average of 1° ± 1.2° to 8.1° ± 4.6° after the insertion of the artificial disc replacement. CONCLUSIONS The reversal of ACDF and conversion to an artificial disc replacement is feasible and achieves postoperative range of motion that is similar to that achieved when performed in a segment not previously fused.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd H Lanman
- University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Neurosurgery, Los Angeles, California.,Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jason M CuÉllar
- Assistant Professor, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Parish JM, Asher AM, Coric D. Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:S50-S56. [PMID: 32994306 DOI: 10.14444/7091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Complications with cervical arthroplasty can be generalized to errors in patient selection or surgical technique. Patients with advanced spondylosis or osteophytic disease, severe facet arthropathy, osteoporosis, sagittal deformity, or preoperative instability are poor candidates for arthroplasty and are more prone to complications. Poor surgical technique can result in subsidence, expulsion, and kyphosis, and it can contribute to heterotopic ossification. Additionally, all of the inherent complications from an anterior cervical approach may occur with cervical artificial disc placement. This article will focus on the complications uniquely associated with cervical arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Parish
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Anthony M Asher
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although extensive reports of clinical outcome after cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion exist, few reviews of the cost-effectiveness research in cervical spine surgery exist. The purpose of this study was to review the concepts of cost-effectiveness research, the various approaches to cost-effectiveness studies in the context of cervical spine surgery, and some of the literature results. METHODS Review article describing cost-effectiveness research concepts, methodology, and results. The article reviews the concept of value, cost, utility, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and recent research. RESULTS Mixed data on cost-effectiveness of CDR compared with fusion exist. Notably, several studies performed within the last 5 years that use prospectively collected utility scores, costs, and adverse event calculations demonstrate a significant cost savings associated with CDR compared with fusion. CONCLUSIONS The recent literature confirms that, in properly selected patients, CDR is more effective and less costly over a 7-year time horizon for patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease. The primary driver of the differential in cost effectiveness is the difference in secondary surgery rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 5 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In properly selected patients, CDR is more effective and less costly over a 7-year time horizon for patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris Radcliff
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Rothman Institute, Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey
| | - Richard D Guyer
- Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that cervical fusion results in increased motion and intradiscal pressures at adjacent levels. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an alternative treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy resulting from degenerative disc disease. By maintaining segmental motion, surgeons hope to avoid some of the primary drawbacks of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as pseudoarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. First introduced in the 1960s, CDA has evolved over the years with changes to implant geometry and materials. Early devices produced suboptimal outcomes, but more recent generations of implants have shown long-term outcomes rivaling or even surpassing those of ACDF. In this article, the rationale for CDA as well as the history of such devices is reviewed.
Collapse
|
45
|
DiCesare JAT, Tucker AM, Say I, Patel K, Lanman TH, Coufal FJ, Millard J, Deckey JE, Shetgeri S, McBride DQ. Mechanical failure of the Mobi-C implant for artificial cervical disc replacement: report of 4 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:727-733. [PMID: 32736353 DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.spine19442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cervical spondylosis is one of the most commonly treated conditions in neurosurgery. Increasingly, cervical disc replacement (CDR) has become an alternative to traditional arthrodesis, particularly when treating younger patients. Thus, surgeons continue to gain a greater understanding of short- and long-term complications of arthroplasty. Here, the authors present a series of 4 patients initially treated with Mobi-C artificial disc implants who developed postoperative neck pain. Dynamic imaging revealed segmental kyphosis at the level of the implant. All implants were locked in the flexion position, and all patients required reoperation. This is the first reported case series of symptomatic segmental kyphosis after CDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irene Say
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Kunal Patel
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Todd H Lanman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Frank J Coufal
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla
| | | | - Jeffrey E Deckey
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthopedic Specialty Institute, Medical Group of Orange County, Orange, California
| | | | - Duncan Q McBride
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nunley PD, Kerr EJ, Cavanaugh DA, Utter PA, Campbell PG, Wadhwa R, Frank KA, Marshall KE, Stone MB. Adjacent Segment Pathology After Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Part 1: Radiographic Results at 7-Year Follow-Up. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:269-277. [PMID: 32699747 DOI: 10.14444/7036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adjacent segment pathology (ASP) remains a concern following treatment with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Radiographic ASP (RASP) is ASP identified on imaging, which may or may not include clinical symptoms. The risk factors for development of RASP and its clinical effects remain controversial. In part 1 of a 2-part publication we evaluate the incidence and predictors of RASP as well as determine whether any association exists between RASP and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods Data were prospectively collected during a US Food and Drug Administration randomized, multicenter, investigational device exemption trial comparing CDA (Mobi-C; Zimmer Biomet, Westminster, CO) with ACDF. Multiple post hoc analyses were conducted on RASP as it related to demographics and patient outcomes. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 3/4 were calculated separately for all groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used analyze whether RASP was associated with patient preoperative demographic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative radiographic characteristics. The association of RASP with PROs was analyzed using generalized estimating equations and matched, retrospective cohort analysis. Results The incidence of grade 3/4 RASP was lower for patients treated with CDA when initial treatment was at 1 level (27% vs 47%, P < .0001) and at 2 levels (14% vs 49%, P < .0001). Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated significantly lower probability of grade 3/4 RASP over time for patients receiving CDA (P < .001). Treatment with ACDF, treatment of 1 level, higher age, body mass index, higher preoperative physical components score, and a lower Cobb angle were associated with elevated risk of grade 3/4 RASP. CDA was shown to be more effective than ACDF (64.4%; 95% CI = 50.9, 74.2; P < .0001) at preventing RASP. Conclusions The incidence and risk of RASP is decreased when patients are treated with CDA compared with ACDF. Although the mechanism of CDA that generates this protective effect is not understood, PROs remain unaffected through 7 years despite changes in RASP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Rishi Wadhwa
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Special Issues MIS/Navigation. OBJECTIVES Over the past decade, cervical total disc replacement has been established in numerous randomized clinical trials as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the long-term outcomes after cervical arthroplasty. METHODS/RESULTS Early outcomes (studies with 2-year follow-up) after arthroplasty established the efficacy of total disc replacement and, more recently, long-term studies have shown the durability of these good clinical outcomes. Biomechanical and clinical data have demonstrated that this motion preservation technology decreases adjacent-level stresses compared with fusion. Additionally, long-term outcomes as well as outcomes after multilevel arthroplasty have now established the role of arthroplasty in select patient populations, namely patients with 1- and 2-level spondylosis/stenosis causing radiculopathy from C3-7. CONCLUSIONS Data on adjacent segment deterioration and adjacent segment reoperation remains controversial but suggest a positive effect after arthroplasty. But these are multifactorial issues and we still do not fully understand all the factors affecting adjacent segment pathology and longer-term studies after arthroplasty will continue to address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M. Parish
- Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Domagoj Coric
- Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Atrium Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reinas R, Kitumba D, Pereira L, Baptista AM, Alves ÓL. Multilevel cervical arthroplasty-clinical and radiological outcomes. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2020; 6:233-242. [PMID: 32309661 PMCID: PMC7154349 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a valid option for single-level cervical disc disease (CDD) as an alternative to fusion. However, the use in 3- and 4-level disc disease is under scrutiny with scarce data published so far. Our aim was to study clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroplasty in patients with multilevel CDD. METHODS Retrospective analysis of clinical records, pre- and post-operative neutral/dynamic X-rays of patients who underwent CDA in multilevel CDD (2-4 levels). We evaluated sagittal balance parameters (C2-7 and index angle, SVA), global and segmental range of motion (ROM)), neck and arm VAS, Odom's criteria, re-operation rate, adjacent segment disease (ASD), willingness to undertake the same procedure again. Rate of heterotopic ossification (HO) was studied for follow-up >2 years. A subgroup analysis was performed regarding 2-level versus 3- or 4-level arthroplasty. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were included, 6 males and 26 females, mean age of 46 years (range, 30-63). Seventy-seven cervical disc levels were treated with the same artificial disc. Twenty-one patients were operated on 2 levels, nine in 3 levels, and 2 patients in 4 levels. Post-operatively, there was a decrease in SVA (-2.2±8.36 mm, P=0.098) and an increase in global (3.7±9.6º, P=0.042) and index (1.3±6.1º, P=0.071) ROM. Mean nVAS and aVAS decreased (7.5±1.1 to 2.5±1.5; 6.3±1.9 to 2.2±1.7, P<0.05). Two-level versus 3-4 level patient subgroups showed a lower SVA (-1.3±8.1 mm P=0.47; -3.4±6.3 mm P=0.107), a slight increase in global (1.6±9.4º P=0.44; 7.2±11.7º P=0.07) and index (1.1±4.7º P=0.12; 1.3±8.1º P=0.35) ROM. HO was present in 9.9% (7/71) of disc levels operated, none of them with grade 3 or 4. CONCLUSIONS Multilevel CDA provides good clinical and radiological outcomes, preserving global and segmental cervical mobility, while having a beneficial effect on sagittal balance. These results hold for 2 to 4 levels, making this technique a valuable option in selected patients with cervical multilevel CDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Reinas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Djamel Kitumba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Américo Boavida, Luanda, Angola
| | - Leopoldina Pereira
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - António M. Baptista
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
| | - Óscar L. Alves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Espinho, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Badhiwala JH, Platt A, Witiw CD, Traynelis VC. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:217-232. [PMID: 32309660 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an effective treatment for cervical spondylosis. A limitation of ACDF is the risk of adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD), owing to arthrodesis of a motion segment. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has hence garnered significant attention; yet, compelling evidence of reduction in ASD requiring surgery is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare long-term longitudinal adjacent-level operation rates with CDA versus ACDF. Methods An electronic literature search was conducted. Eligible studies were multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CDA with ACDF for one- or two-level symptomatic cervical spondylosis. The primary outcome was adjacent-level operation. Index-level reoperation was a secondary outcome. Outcomes were evaluated at 1-year intervals from the index operation to last reported follow-up by random-effects meta-analyses. Results Eleven RCTs met criteria. For one-level spondylosis, there was no difference in the rate of adjacent-level operation between CDA (2.3%) and ACDF (3.6%) at 2 years. However, a large difference favoring CDA became evident at 5 years and persisted at 7 years (4.3% vs. 10.8%, P<0.001). Significantly fewer patients who underwent CDA required index-level reoperation at all time points out to 7 years (5.2% vs. 12.7%, P<0.001). Similar to one-level operations, there was no significant difference in adjacent-level operations with two-level CDA (1.7%) versus two-level ACDF (3.4%) at 2 years. At 7 years, a significant difference favoring CDA became apparent (5.1% vs. 10.0%, P=0.014). Two-level CDA resulted in fewer index-level reoperations out to 7 years (4.2% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001). Conclusions In this meta-analysis, the short-term rate of adjacent-level operation was similar with CDA or ACDF. However, around 5 years, a statistically significant divergence emerged, where the rate of adjacent-level surgery rose steeply for ACDF. Index-level reoperations were less frequent with CDA in both the short- and long-term. These data indicate CDA may have a superior longevity to ACDF with regard to need for subsequent adjacent-level operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jetan H Badhiwala
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Platt
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher D Witiw
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vincent C Traynelis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wang QL, Tu ZM, Hu P, Kontos F, Li YW, Li L, Dai YL, Lv GH, Wang B. Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Orthop Surg 2019; 12:16-30. [PMID: 31863642 PMCID: PMC7031601 DOI: 10.1111/os.12585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whether cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is superior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains controversial, especially in relation to long-term results. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficiency of CDA and ACDF for cervical disc disease. METHODS We performed this study according to the Cochrane methodology. An extensive search was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 1 June 2019 using the following key words: "anterior cervical fusion," "arthroplasty," "replacement" and "artificial disc". RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane, London, UK) was used to analyze data. Safety and efficiency outcome measures included the success rate, functional outcome measures, adverse events (AE), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), secondary surgery, and patients' satisfaction and recommendation rates. The OR and MD with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate discontinuous and continuous variables, respectively. The statistically significant level was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 11 randomized controlled trials with 3505 patients (CDA/ACDF: 1913/1592) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with ACDF, CDA achieved significantly higher overall success (2.10, 95% CI [1.70, 2.59]), neck disability index (NDI) success (1.73, 95% CI [1.37, 2.18]), neurological success (1.65, 95% CI [1.24, 2.20]), patients' satisfaction (2.14, 95% CI [1.50, 3.05]), and patients' recommendation rates (3.23, 95% CI [1.79, 5.80]). Functional outcome measures such as visual analog score neck pain (-5.50, 95% CI [-8.49, -2.52]) and arm pain (-3.78, 95% CI [-7.04, -0.53]), the Short Form-36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS) (1.93, 95% CI [0.53, 3.32]), and the Short Form-36 mental component score (SF-36 MCS) (2.62, 95% CI [0.95, 4.29]), revealed superiority in the CDA group. CDA also achieved a significantly lower rate of symptomatic ASD (0.46, 95% CI [0.34, 0.63]), total secondary surgery (0.50, 95% CI [0.29, 0.87]), secondary surgery at the index level (0.46, 95% CI [0.29, 0.74]), and secondary surgery at the adjacent level (0.37, 95% CI [0.28, 0.49]). However, no significant difference was found in radiological success (1.35, 95% CI [0.88, 2.08]), NDI score (-2.88, 95% CI [-5.93, 0.17]), total reported AE (1.14, 95% CI [0.92, 1.42]), serious AE (0.89, 95% CI [0.71, 1.11]), device/surgery-related AE (0.90, 95% CI [0.68, 1.18]), radiological superior ASD (0.63, 95% CI [0.28, 1.43]), inferior ASD (0.45, 95% CI [0.19, 1.11]), and work status (1.33, 95% CI [0.78, 2.25]). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed different results between US and non-US groups. CONCLUSION Our study provided further evidence that compared to ACDF, CDA had a higher long-term clinical success rate and better functional outcome measurements, and resulted in less symptomatic ASD and fewer secondary surgeries. However, worldwide multicenter RCT with long-term follow up are still needed for further evaluation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao-Li Wang
- ICU Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Tu
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pan Hu
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Filippos Kontos
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ya-Wei Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yu-Liang Dai
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guo-Hua Lv
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bing Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|