1
|
Giacoppo D, Laudani C, Occhipinti G, Spagnolo M, Greco A, Rochira C, Agnello F, Landolina D, Mauro MS, Finocchiaro S, Mazzone PM, Ammirabile N, Imbesi A, Raffo C, Buccheri S, Capodanno D. Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Circulation 2024; 149:1065-1086. [PMID: 38344859 PMCID: PMC10980178 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.067583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results from multiple randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-guided PCI as well as a pivotal trial comparing the 2 intravascular imaging (IVI) techniques have provided mixed results. METHODS Major electronic databases were searched to identify eligible trials evaluating at least 2 PCI guidance strategies among ICA, IVUS, and OCT. The 2 coprimary outcomes were target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes included ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted. The results were replicated by Bayesian random-effects models. Pairwise meta-analyses of the direct components, multiple sensitivity analyses, and pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA were supplemented. RESULTS The results from 24 randomized trials (15 489 patients: IVUS versus ICA, 46.4%, 7189 patients; OCT versus ICA, 32.1%, 4976 patients; OCT versus IVUS, 21.4%, 3324 patients) were included in the network meta-analyses. IVUS was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization compared with ICA (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), whereas no significant differences were observed between OCT and ICA (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-1.09]) and OCT and IVUS (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.88-1.66]). Myocardial infarction did not significantly differ between guidance strategies (IVUS versus ICA: OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]; OCT versus ICA: OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.68-1.11]; OCT versus IVUS: OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.69-1.33]). These results were consistent with the secondary outcomes of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and sensitivity analyses generally did not reveal inconsistency. OCT was associated with a significant reduction of stent thrombosis compared with ICA (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26-0.92]) but only in the frequentist analysis. Similarly, the results in terms of survival between IVUS or OCT and ICA were uncertain across analyses. A total of 25 randomized trials (17 128 patients) were included in the pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA where IVI guidance was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS IVI-guided PCI was associated with a reduction in ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization compared with ICA-guided PCI, with the difference most evident for IVUS. In contrast, no significant differences in myocardial infarction were observed between guidance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Giacoppo
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Claudio Laudani
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanni Occhipinti
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Spagnolo
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Antonio Greco
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Carla Rochira
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Federica Agnello
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Davide Landolina
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Sara Mauro
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Simone Finocchiaro
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Placido Maria Mazzone
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Nicola Ammirabile
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Antonino Imbesi
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Carmelo Raffo
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Sergio Buccheri
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico “Rodolico – San Marco,” University of Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahman N, Ullah I, Adnan G, Khan MA, Farhad A, Shah I, Abidi J. Clinical Outcomes and Prevalence of Intravascular Ultrasound Use at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a South Asian Country. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11:42. [PMID: 34513206 PMCID: PMC8422435 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_93_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) plays a pivotal role in the current era of coronary interventions. We aimed to determine the prevalence of IVUS use and clinical outcomes of IVUS-guided percutaneous treatment of coronary arteries lesions in a South Asian country. Material and Methods: It is a retrospective observational study, a total of 134 consecutive patients having done IVUS, was enrolled from January 2013 to March 2020 at a single center. Results: Out of 134 patients, 97 (72.4%) were male with a mean age of 63.1 ± 12.9 years. The prevalence of IVUS in our center was 3.0%. The most frequent comorbidity observed was dyslipidemia, n = 111 (82.8%). Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, n = 50 (37.3%), was the common mode of presentation. On coronary angiogram, the left main (LM) disease was found in n = 46 (34.3%), however, single-vessel disease, n = 51 (38.1%), was most commonly noted. IVUS utilization was higher in the left anterior descending, n = 94 (70.1%), followed by LM, n = 46 (34.3%). The LM mean minimal luminal area was 6.0 ± 2.6 mm2 and minimal luminal diameter was 4.53 mm ± 0.6 (mean). The coronary artery dissection was noted in n = 15 (11.2%). The mean duration of follow-up in our study was 40.3 ± 30.1 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded in n = 13 (9.7%), which included heart failure, n = 4 (3%). Cardiovascular death and target vessel revascularization occurred in n = 3 (2.2%). Conclusion: IVUS results in a significant decrease in MACE. Our data might support the broader use of IVUS in both developed and in our part of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasir Rahman
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Ihsan Ullah
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Ghufran Adnan
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Maria Ali Khan
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Awais Farhad
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Izat Shah
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Jabir Abidi
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wybraniec MT, Bańka P, Bochenek T, Roleder T, Mizia-Stec K. Small vessel coronary artery disease: How small can we go with myocardial revascularization? Cardiol J 2020; 28:767-778. [PMID: 32986235 DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2020.0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The issue of small coronary artery atherosclerosis represents an intriguing aspect of coronary artery disease, which is related with higher rates of peri- and post-procedural complications and impaired long-term outcome. This problem is further complicated by the unclear definition of small coronary vessel. Recent randomized controlled trials have provided new data on possible novel interventional treatment of small coronary vessels with drug-coated balloons instead of traditional new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Also, the conservative management represents a therapeutic option in light of the results of the recent ISCHEMIA trial. The current article provides an overview of the most appropriate definition, interventional management, and prognosis of small coronary artery atherosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej T Wybraniec
- First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. .,Upper Silesia Medical Center, Katowice, Poland.
| | - Paweł Bańka
- First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.,Upper Silesia Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
| | - Tomasz Bochenek
- First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.,Upper Silesia Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
| | - Tomasz Roleder
- Regional Specialist Hospital, Research and Development Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
- First Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.,Upper Silesia Medical Center, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khalid M, Patel NK, Amgai B, Bakhit A, Khalid M, Kafle P, Chakraborty S, Gayam V, Mukhtar O, Malyshev Y, Hashmi A, Patel J, Shani J, Patel V. In-hospital outcomes of angiography versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2020; 10:436-442. [PMID: 33235678 PMCID: PMC7671732 DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1800970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We compared the in-hospital complications, outcomes, cost, and length of stay (LOS) between angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the USA. Methods A nationwide inpatient database was queried to identify patients >18 years with STEMI who underwent angiography-guided and IVUS-guided PCI from January 2016 to December 2016. We compared the in-hospital mortality, complications, cost, and LOS between the two groups. Results We identified 100,485 patients who underwent angiography-guided PCI and 5,460 patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI. In-hospital mortality was not statistically different (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.46 − 1.22, P = 0.24). Patients who underwent PCI with IVUS were more likely to have coronary artery dissection (OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.34 − 7.7, p = <0.01), and both groups had a similar incidence of acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. The mean LOS was similar, but the mean total cost was higher in the group that underwent PCI under IVUS guidance. Conclusions The in-hospital mortality, hemodialysis, and the use of support devices did not reach a statistical difference between the two groups. However, we observed higher rates of coronary dissection with the use of IVUS in STEMI management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mazin Khalid
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Neel Kumar Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Birendra Amgai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Ahmed Bakhit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mowyad Khalid
- Division of Cardiology, Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Paritosh Kafle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | - Vijay Gayam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Osama Mukhtar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Yuri Malyshev
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Arsalan Hashmi
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jacob Shani
- Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Vinod Patel
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|