Rehospitalisation risk by hypnotics class in older patients with heart failure: a cohort study utilizing administrative claims data in Japan

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing the safety of orexin receptor antagonists and other hypnotic types for older patients with heart failure (HF) remain lacking. This study aimed to compare orexin receptor antagonists (suvorexant) with benzodiazepines or Z-drugs for sleep treatment and investigate the risk of acute HF-related rehospitalisation in older patients with HF.

METHODS

This study used a cohort design to analyse data from an administrative claims database from April 2008 to December 2020. The study population was determined based on inclusion and exclusion criteria from a cohort of 1 159 937 patients aged ≥65 years, selected through random sampling. The follow-up period was censored based on multiple criteria, including outcome occurrences and hypnotic classification changes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were conducted for risk assessment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1858 patients, aged ≥65 years and experiencing their first HF-related hospitalisation. These patients were categorised based on the initially prescribed hypnotic classification, including suvorexant, benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in 490, 606 and 762 patients, respectively. The average age and SD were similar across all hypnotic classes at 82.7±7.6 years. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated a higher trend of rehospitalisation risk for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs than for suvorexant. The adjusted HRs were 2.77 (95% CI 1.17 to 6.52) for benzodiazepines and 2.98 (95% CI 1.33 to 6.68) for Z-drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Suvorexant administration for sleep treatment in older patients with HF shows a potentially reduced risk of acute HF-related rehospitalisation compared with benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. The results of this study provide valuable information for selecting hypnotics in older patients with HF having concurrent sleep disorders.

Does Improvement in Health-Related Lifestyle Habits Increase Purpose in Life among a Health Literate Cohort?

A growing number of studies have revealed the association between health-related lifestyle habits and purpose in life. However, the mechanism linking the two has not been adequately understood. This study aims to examine the effect of changes in health-related lifestyle habits on purpose in life. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on certified professional specialists of health management. We analyzed the cohort’s demographic information, health-related lifestyle behaviors, reported changes in health-related lifestyle habits (exercise, diet, sleep, and other habits), and purpose in life using a validated tool (Ikigai-9). The cohort was divided into four groups based on the number of reported changes in health-related lifestyles. The purpose in life score was compared among the four groups with and without adjusting for lifestyle. In total, there were 4820 participants. The means (and SD) of the Ikigai-9 score for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 31.4 (6.6), 32.2 (5.6), 32.8 (5.8), and 34.9 (5.4), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the Ikigai-9 score among the groups. Healthier changes in lifestyle habits increased perceptions of purpose in life. Both purpose in life and health-related lifestyle habits might be the target factors for disease prevention and health promotion.

Effects of suvorexant on sleep apnea in patients with heart failure: A protocol of crossover pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, is known as a safe and effective sleep medication. Many patients with heart failure (HF) have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and are short sleepers, and it is unknown whether suvorexant is effective in HF patients and can improve insomnia safely. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of suvorexant on SDB in patients with HF.

METHODS

The Heart Failure with Insomnia and Suvorexant trial of Juntendo University Hospital and Juntendo Shizuoka Hospital (J-FLAVOR trial) is a multicenter trial with a randomized double crossover design. We will enroll a total of 30 HF patients treated in the Juntendo University Hospital and Juntendo Shizuoka Hospital. Eligible patients will undergo portable sleep monitoring twice with or without oral administration of suvorexant in a randomly assigned order. Before the study night, patients in the suvorexant first group will receive suvorexant for 4 consecutive days. There are at least 3 wash-out days between the study nights with and without suvorexant. Primary outcome measures of the non-inferiority trial of suvorexant include the apnea-hypopnea index and the severity of SDB, and the results will be compared between the study nights with and without suvorexant.

CONCLUSION

The present study can determine whether suvorexant can be used in HF patients without affecting their SDB. This is a pilot study to primarily assess whether suvorexant affects the severity of SDB in patients with HF. Therefore, further study is warranted to investigate whether suvorexant alters short- and long-term clinical outcomes by providing longer and better sleep in patients with HF.