Cardiovascular response to postural perturbations of different intensities in healthy young adults

Cardiovascular response to anticipatory and reactionary postural perturbations in young adults

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? It has been suggested that the cardiovascular responses to a postural perturbation are centrally mediated and reflex mediated. We wanted to know the extent to which the cardiovascular responses to external perturbations could be executed in a feedforward manner, in anticipation of the perturbation. What is the main finding and its importance? We found no anticipatory component driving heart rate and systolic blood pressure responses, suggesting that reflexive mechanisms dominate cardiovascular regulation after a postural perturbation in young adults.

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular responses to postural perturbations have been reported, but whether the cardiovascular responses to external perturbations could be executed in anticipation of the perturbation is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of anticipated and reactionary perturbations on heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) responses in healthy young adults. A secondary aim was to determine whether perceived state anxiety scores were correlated with the change in HR response during postural perturbation. Twenty healthy young adults stood on a treadmill and experienced two perturbation conditions (anticipatory vs. reactionary), each with two intensity levels (Step vs. No Step). The HR and SBP were collected continuously. Two-way repeated-measures statistical non-parametric mapping tests were used to compare HR and SBP responses to the perturbations over time (from -3 to +8 s). The results indicated that HR was significantly elevated in the higher intensity perturbations [Step vs. No Step, at 0.56-1.32 s (P < 0.0001) and 1.92-3.44 s (P < 0.0001) post-perturbation], while there were no differences in HR between perturbation types (anticipatory vs. reactionary) or in SBP between perturbation types and intensity levels. The perceived state anxiety scores did not differ between perturbation types and intensity levels but were correlated with the change in HR post-perturbation (P = 0.013). We suggest that reflexive mechanisms dominate cardiovascular regulation after anticipatory and reactionary perturbations. The data highlight the cardiovascular mechanism(s) associated with perturbations that should be considered when assessing postural stability in populations with poor balance performance.

The effects of slow breathing on postural muscles during standing perturbations in young adults

Maintaining standing balance is vital to completing activities in daily living. Recent findings suggest an interaction between cardiovascular and postural control systems. Volitional slow breathing can modulate the cardiovascular response and affect postural control during quiet standing. However, the effects of slow breathing during threats to standing balance have not been studied. The study examined the effect of slow breathing on the latency and amplitude of postural muscle responses to perturbations of the base of support in healthy, young adults. Twenty-seven participants completed two balance perturbation tasks in standing on an instrumented split-belt treadmill while breathing spontaneously and breathing at 6 breaths per minute. Each perturbation task consisted of 25 posteriorly directed translations of the treadmill belts every 8-12 s. Muscle latency and muscle burst amplitude were measured using surface electromyography from the right limb for the quadriceps (QUADS), medial hamstring (MH), gastrocnemii (GASTROC), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle groups, while a respiratory belt was used to record respiratory rate. Results indicated that during the slow breathing task both muscle latency (p = 0.022) and muscle burst amplitude (p = 0.011) decreased compared to spontaneous breathing. The EMG pre-perturbation activation was not significantly different in any muscle group between conditions (p > 0.167). The study found that reducing respiratory rate to approximately 6 breaths per minute affects the neuromuscular responses in the lower limb muscles to perturbations.