A new era for resident duty hours in surgery calls for greater emphasis on resident wellness

A Systematic Review of Wellness in Plastic Surgery Training

BACKGROUND

Physician and resident wellness has been increasingly emphasized as a means of improving patient outcomes and preventing physician burnout. Few studies have been performed with a focus on wellness in plastic surgery training.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to systematically review what literature exists on the topic of wellness in plastic surgery training and critically appraise it.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to identify journal articles related to wellness in plastic surgery residency. Seventeen studies (6 cohort and 11 cross-sectional) met inclusion criteria and were appraised with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOQAS) to determine the quality of the studies based on selection, comparability, and outcome metrics.

RESULTS

Critical assessment showed that the studies were highly variable in focus. Overall, the quality of the data was low, with an average NOQAS score of 4.1. Only 2 studies focused on plastic surgery residents, examining work hours and social wellness, respectively; they were awarded NOQAS scores of 3 and 4 out of 10.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggest that little research has been devoted to wellness in surgery training, especially in regard to plastic surgery residents, and what research that has been performed is of relatively low quality. The available research suggests a relatively high prevalence of burnout among plastic surgery residents. Evidence suggests some organization-level interventions to improve trainee wellness. Because outcomes-based data on the effects of such interventions are particularly lacking, further investigation is warranted.

Defining Communication Improvement Needs in General Surgery: An Analysis of Pages, Communications, Patterns, and Content☆?>

OBJECTIVE

To describe patterns of pages communication to general surgery (GS) residents, identify the need for and develop strategies to improve interprofessional communication.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

General surgery (GS) service at a tertiary care academic institution, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

All pages sent to GS residents over 4 weeks at an academic institution. Timing, training level of receiver and content of pages were captured.

RESULTS

Communication priority was assigned by 2 independent reviewers-low (121+ min), medium (31-120min), high (6-30min), and immediate (0-5min) priority. Overall, 2 independent reviewers analyzed pages' content through an inductive process, and generated themes. Of 2025 pages retrieved, 963 (47.5%) contained exclusively a call back number. A median of 74 pages per day (range: 43-116) were received, with median page interval of 9.4 minutes (range: 0-640). Junior residents received 79.5% of pages. Timing of the pages was 43.9% weekday shift, 31.8% weeknight shift, and 24.3% weekend call. Communication priority was deemed low for 35.4% of pages, medium for 32.3%, high for 12.4%, and immediate for 0.7%. Content analysis of 1062 pages generated 5 major themes: nonurgent medical issue (54.0%), administrative (15.3%), communication (13.5%), emergencies (4.8%), and GS consultation requests (4.0%). Priority and content of pages varied according to training level and page timing.

CONCLUSIONS

Pages to GS residents were frequent and most often of low priority. They were seldom related to urgent medical matters. Education and new communication strategies are warranted to reduce low priority pages.

Scholarly Conversations in Medical Education

This supplement includes the eight research papers accepted by the 2016 Research in Medical Education Program Planning Committee. In this Commentary, the authors use "conversations in medical education" as a guiding metaphor to explore what these papers contribute to the current scholarly discourse in medical education. They organize their discussion around two domains: the topic of study and the methodological approach. The authors map the eight research papers to six "hot topics" in medical education: (1) curriculum reform, (2) duty hours restriction, (3) learner well-being, (4) innovations in teaching and assessment, (5) self-regulated learning, and (6) learning environment, and to three purposes commonly served by medical education research: (1) description, (2) justification, and (3) clarification. They discuss the range of methods employed in the papers. The authors end by encouraging educators to engage in these ongoing scholarly conversations.

Optimizing inter-professional communications in surgery: protocol for a mixed-methods exploratory study

Background

Effective nurse-physician communication is critical to delivering high quality patient care. Interprofessional communication between surgical nurses and surgeons, often through the use of pagers, is currently characterized by information gaps and interprofessional tensions, both sources of workflow interruption, potential medical error, impaired educational experience, and job satisfaction.

Objective

This study aims to define current patterns of, and understand enablers and barriers to interprofessional communication in general surgery, in order to optimize the use of communication technologies, teamwork, provider satisfaction, and quality and safety of patient care.

Methods

We will use a mixed-methods multiphasic approach. In phase 1, a quantitative and content analysis of alpha-numeric pages (ANP) received by general surgery residents will be conducted to develop a paging taxonomy. Frequency, timing (on-call vs regular duty hours), and interval between pages will be described using a 4-week sample of pages. Results will be compared between pages sent to junior and senior residents. Finally, using an inductive analysis, two independent assessors will classify ANP thematically. In Phase 2, a qualitative constructivist approach will explore stakeholders’ experiences with interprofessional communication, including paging, through interviews and shadowing of 40 residents and 40 nurses at two institutions. Finally, a survey will be developed, tested, and administered to all general surgery nurses and residents at the same two institutions, to evaluate their attitudes about the effectiveness and quality of interprofessional communication, and assess their satisfaction.

Results

Describing the profile of current pages is the first step towards identifying areas and root causes of IPC inefficiency. This study will identify key contextual barriers to surgical nurse-house staff communication, and existing interprofessional knowledge and practice gaps.

Conclusions

Our findings will inform the design of a guideline and tailored intervention to improve IPC in order to ensure high quality patient care, optimal educational experience, and provider satisfaction.