Current Controversies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Report from the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Scientific Committee

Secondhand Smoke Exposure and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Many studies have shown that active smoking leads to an increasing incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, studies interested in the effects of secondhand smoke exposure (SHS exposure) on COPD were less or underappreciated.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between SHS exposure and the risk of COPD. Three databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) were searched to obtain data. After assessing the study quality, stratified analyses were performed according to the region, gender, and duration of exposure. Cochran's Q and I² were utilized for heterogeneity assessment. To assess publication bias, we used a funnel plot and Egger's test.

Results

A total of 15 studies (6 cross-sectional studies, 6 case-control studies, and 3 cohort studies) with 25,592 participants were involved in this meta-analysis. This study showed that SHS exposure was associated with an increased risk of COPD (odds ratio (OR): 2.25, 95% CI: 1.40-3.62, I² = 98%, p < 0.01 for heterogeneity based on a random-effects analysis model), especially in those with a longer time exposure of more than 5 years was 4.38 (95% CI: 1.28-15.00, I² = 89%, p < 0.01 for heterogeneity based on a random-effects analysis model). In addition, SHS exposure also increases the risk of COPD in women (odds ratio (OR): 2.02, 95% CI: 1.52-2.67, I² = 0%, p = 0.89 for heterogeneity based on a random-effects analysis model).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that SHS exposure is associated with the risk of COPD, especially for individuals with a long time exposed.

Trial Registry

Prospero CRD42022329421.

Therapeutic benefits of recombinant alpha1-antitrypsin IgG1 Fc-fusion protein in experimental emphysema

BACKGROUND

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) is a major serine protease inhibitor. AAT deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder characterized by early-onset severe emphysema. In well-selected AATD patients, therapy with plasma-derived AAT (pAAT), "augmentation therapy", provides modest clinical improvement but is perceived as cumbersome with weekly intravenous infusions. Using mouse models of emphysema, we compared the effects of a recombinant AAT-IgG1 Fc-fusion protein (AAT-Fc), which is expected to have a longer half-life following infusion, to those of pAAT.

METHODS

In an elastase model of emphysema, mice received a single intratracheal instillation of porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) or human leucocyte elastase (hLE). AAT-Fc, pAAT, or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally 1 day prior to or 3 weeks following elastase instillation. Lung function and histology assessments were performed at 7 and 32 days after elastase instillation. In a cigarette smoke (CS) model of emphysema, mice were exposed to CS daily, 5 days a week, for 6 months and AAT-Fc, pAAT, or vehicle were administered every 10 days during the last 3 months of CS exposure. Assessments were performed 3 days after the last CS exposure. Immune responses to lung elastin peptide (EP) and the effects of AAT-Fc or pAAT treatment on dendritic cell (DC) function were determined ex vivo.

RESULTS

Both elastase instillation and CS exposure triggered emphysema-like alveolar enlargement, increased lung compliance, and increased markers of inflammation compared to controls. Administration of AAT-Fc either prior to or following elastase instillation or during CS exposure provided greater protection than pAAT against alveolar enlargement, lung dysfunction, and airway inflammation. When challenged ex vivo with EP, spleen mononuclear cells from elastase-exposed mice exhibited dose-dependent production of IFNγ and IL-17, suggesting immune reactivity. In co-culture experiments with splenic CD4+ T cells isolated from elastase-exposed mice, AAT-Fc treatment prior to EP-priming of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells inhibited the production of IFNγ and IL-17.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to pAAT, AAT-Fc more effectively prevented or attenuated elastase- and CS-induced models of emphysema. These effects were associated with immunomodulatory effects on DC activity. AAT-Fc may provide a therapeutic option to individuals with AATD- and CS-induced emphysema.

Comparative analysis of pathophysiological parameters between emphysematous smokers and emphysematous patients with COPD

Emphysematous smokers with normal spirometry form a considerable proportion of the clinical population. However, despite presenting with respiratory symptoms and activity limitation, they cannot be diagnosed with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) according to current criteria. Thus, we aimed to determine whether emphysema in smokers has a different pathogenesis from that in patients with COPD. We compared 12 pairs of lung tissue samples from emphysematous patients with normal spirometry and COPD, and determined the degree of emphysema using computed tomography. With a focus on COPD-related pathogenesis, we independently assessed inflammatory response, protease-antiprotease balance, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in both groups. Both groups showed similar pathological changes at a comparable degree of emphysema; the expression of inflammatory factors was comparable, with overexpression of proteases and decreased levels of antiproteases. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the activities of glutathione and superoxide dismutase, and expression of apoptosis-related factors. In conclusion, emphysema in smokers with normal spirometry and in patients with COPD had similar pathogenesis. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second cannot be used as the sole diagnostic criterion in patients with COPD; early intervention is of great importance to such patients.

Blood eosinophils as biomarkers of therapeutic response to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Still work in progress

Disease phenotyping is a key step towards an increasingly personalized approach to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), leading to a more precise assessment, treatment and definition of disease outcomes. The search for biomarkers able to guide the identification of COPD phenotypes are of great importance for both researchers and clinicians. However, while several biomarkers of inflammation [e.g., peripheral blood eosinophils and fractional expired nitric oxide] have been identified and applied in asthma, none has been successfully linked to discrete clinical parameters of COPD such as exacerbations, natural progression, and treatment response or mortality risk. Recently, several studies have shown that blood eosinophils are a potential biomarker for patient subset stratification in COPD therapy. Here we reviewed the value of blood eosinophils in predicting the response of COPD patients to treatment.

Predicting response to benralizumab in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analyses of GALATHEA and TERRANOVA studies

BACKGROUND

Benralizumab did not significantly reduce exacerbations compared with placebo in the phase 3 GALATHEA and TERRANOVA trials of benralizumab for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to identify clinical and physiological characteristics of patients with COPD that could help to identify people who are likely to have the greatest treatment effect with benralizumab.

METHODS

We analysed individual study and pooled results from GALATHEA and TERRANOVA. At study enrolment, patients from GALATHEA and TERRANOVA were aged 40-85 years, had moderate to very severe airflow limitation, had elevated blood eosinophil counts, and at least two exacerbations or one severe exacerbation in the previous year despite dual inhaled therapy (inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β₂-agonists or long-acting β₂-agonists plus long-acting muscarinic antagonists) or triple inhaled therapy (inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β₂-agonists plus long-acting muscarinic antagonists). We analysed data for 3910 patients who received benralizumab (30 mg or 100 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks; first three doses every 4 weeks) or placebo with dual or triple therapy to identify factors consistently associated with annual exacerbation rate reduction. We evaluated the annual exacerbation rate for benralizumab versus placebo as the primary endpoint. GALATHEA and TERRANOVA are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02138916 and NCT02155660, respectively.

FINDINGS

For 2665 patients with elevated blood eosinophil counts, treatment effect with benralizumab every 8 weeks at 100 mg, but not at 30 mg, occurred for patients with a history of more frequent exacerbations, poorer baseline lung function, or greater baseline lung function improvement with short-acting bronchodilators. Patients with baseline blood eosinophil counts of 220 cells per μL or greater with: three or more exacerbations in the previous year receiving benralizumab every 8 weeks versus placebo, had rate ratios (RRs) of 0·69 (95% CI 0·56-0·83) for 100 mg and 0·86 (0·71-1·04) for 30 mg; postbronchodilator FEV₁ of less than 40% had RRs of 0·76 (0·64-0·91) for 100 mg and 0·90 (0·76-1·06) for 30 mg; and postbronchodilator response of at least 15% had RRs of 0·67 (0·54-0·83) for 100 mg and 0·87 (0·71-1·07) for 30 mg. When combined factors were examined, patients with elevated baseline blood eosinophil counts, with three or more exacerbations in the previous year, and who were receiving triple therapy were identified as likely to benefit from benralizumab 100 mg every 8 weeks versus placebo (RR 0·70 [95% CI 0·56-0·88]). Benralizumab 30 mg every 8 weeks did not benefit patients meeting these criteria compared with placebo (RR 0·99 [95% CI 0·79-1·23]).

INTERPRETATION

Elevated blood eosinophil counts combined with clinical characteristics identified a subpopulation of patients with COPD who had reductions in exacerbations with benralizumab treatment. These hypothesis-generating analyses identified the potential efficacy of benralizumab 100 mg for this subpopulation. These findings require prospective evaluation in clinical trials.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.