Standard versus Accelerated Speaking Valve Placement after Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Study

Valves for the Voiceless: Time to Speaking Valve Use in Posttracheostomy Patients After Multidisciplinary Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To review speaking valve (SV) use at a tertiary academic medical center and determine whether a multidisciplinary team implementation of SV protocols increased SV use and decreased time to SV trials.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients who underwent a tracheostomy between 2017 and 2023 before and after the dissemination of new protocols from a new multidisciplinary tracheostomy care initiative in 2019. The calendar days between meeting SV eligibility criteria and initial trial of SV were compared. Eligibility criteria for SV was defined as any patient ≥48 hours posttracheotomy who can breathe unassisted, off mechanical ventilation, tolerate a deflated cuff, and participate in an evaluation. Interrupted time series analysis using segmented negative binomial regression assessed the change in time to SV placement before and after protocol implementation.

RESULTS

A total of 421 patients were identified. After new protocols were disseminated, eligible patients with a SV trial increased from 75% to 95% with an increase in percentage of patients who tolerated the SV on their first attempt from 60% to 75%. Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated protocol implementation was associated with an overall 80% decrease in time to SV placement.

DISCUSSION

Continued barriers to SV implementation such as elevated tracheal pressures due to large tracheostomy sizes, or inappropriately early consultations with patients unable to participate in SV exam, may be amenable to further institution-level quality improvement initiatives.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A multidisciplinary initiative's dissemination of protocols with algorithms for SLP consultation and SV use can help standardize post-operative tracheostomy care.

Impact of tracheostomy tube modalities on ventilatory mechanics: a bench study

PURPOSE

Tracheostomized patients often present with muscle weakness, altered consciousness, or swallowing difficulties. Hence, the literature is scarce regarding the challenging management of tracheostomy weaning. There is a need to strengthen the understanding of respiratory mechanisms with the different tracheostomy tube modalities that compose this weaning pathway. We aimed to evaluate the impact of these modalities on the work of breathing (WOB), total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot), and tidal volume (VT).

METHODS

With a three-dimensional (3D) printed head mimicking human upper airways, we added a tracheal extension, and pierced to allow insertion of a size 7.0 tracheostomy cannula. The whole was connected to an artificial lung. Three lung mechanics were simulated (normal, obstructive and restrictive). We compared five different tracheostomy tube modalities to a control scenario in which the tube was capped and the cuff was deflated.

RESULTS

A marginal difference was observed on the WOB within conditions with a slight increase + 0.004 [95% CI (0.003-0.004); p < 0.001] when the cuff was inflated in the normal and restrictive models and a slight decrease in the obstructive model. The highest PEEPtot that was reached was + 1 cmH2O [95% CI (1-1.1); p < 0.001] with high-flow therapy (HFT) with the cuff inflated in the obstructive model. We observed a statistically significant reduction in VT [up to - 57 mL 95% CI (- 60 to - 54); p < 0.001] when the cuff was inflated, in both the normal and obstructive models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of conditions that involve cuff deflation. Intermediate modalities with the cuff deflated produced similar results than cannula capping.

Ferrer Adjustable Speaking Valve for Early Phonation in a Deconditioned Patient

A patient with multiple comorbidities and an eight-year history of tracheostomy was being treated for tracheitis. At this point, she became incapable of using regular speaking valves, and multiple attempts to reintroduce the speaking valve failed. A Ferrer adjustable speaking valve (FASV) was designed with gradations of outflow closure, allowing air to go through the vocal cords for phonation. The FASV was offered to her through the compassionate use program at the FDA. At 20% initial closure, the patient was able to tolerate the valve and was advanced to 50% closure, at which point she could phonate partially. The use of the valve was terminated at the time of her transfer, 23 days after the initiation of use. This suggests the safety and possible efficacy of using an adjustable speaking valve earlier than regular valves, allowing patients to communicate earlier and further exercise their diaphragms.

Ventilator Weaning in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation-A Narrative Review

Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) beyond 21 days, usually referred to as prolonged MV, represent a unique group with significant medical needs and a generally poor prognosis. Research suggests that approximately 10% of all MV patients will need prolonged ventilatory care, and that number will continue to rise. Although we have extensive knowledge of MV in the acute care setting, less is known about care in the post-ICU setting. More than 50% of patients who were deemed unweanable in the ICU will be liberated from MV in the post-acute setting. Prolonged MV also presents a challenge in care for medically complex, elderly, socioeconomically disadvantaged and marginalized individuals, usually at the end of their life. Patients and their families often rely on ventilator weaning facilities and skilled nursing homes for the continuation of care, but home ventilation is becoming more common. The focus of this review is to discuss recent advances in the weaning strategies in prolonged MV, present their outcomes and provide insight into the complexity of care.

Sepsis, critical illness, communication, swallowing and Sustainable Development Goals 3, 4, 10

PURPOSE

Sepsis is a major global health problem with an estimated 49 million cases globally each year causing as many as 11 million deaths. The primary objective of this commentary is to describe the impacts of sepsis and critical illness on communication and swallowing function, and to discuss management strategies considering the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

RESULT

Communication and swallowing disabilities can occur with sepsis and critical illness. A holistic framework to optimise function, recovery, and future research priorities across the lifespan can be developed through the SDGs.

CONCLUSION

Communication and swallowing disabilities following critical illness associated with sepsis have global impacts. Early multidisciplinary engagement is key to optimising individuals' function. Collaborative research, education, and public awareness is urgently needed to increase equity in health outcomes across populations. This commentary paper supports progress towards good health and well-being (SDG 3), quality education (SDG 4) and reduced inequalities (SDG 10).

Prevention of Tracheostomy-Related Pressure Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the critical care environment, individuals who undergo tracheostomy are highly susceptible to tracheostomy-related pressure injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to reduce tracheostomy-related pressure injury in the critical care setting.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies of pediatric or adult patients in intensive care units conducted to evaluate interventions to reduce tracheostomy-related pressure injury. Reviewers independently extracted data on study and patient characteristics, incidence of tracheostomy-related pressure injury, characteristics of the interventions, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias criteria.

RESULTS

Ten studies (2 randomized clinical trials, 5 quasi-experimental, 3 observational) involving 2023 critically ill adult and pediatric patients met eligibility criteria. The incidence of tracheostomy-related pressure injury was 17.0% before intervention and 3.5% after intervention, a 79% decrease. Pressure injury most commonly involved skin in the peristomal area and under tracheostomy ties and flanges. Interventions to mitigate risk of tracheostomy-related pressure injury included modifications to tracheostomy flange securement with foam collars, hydrophilic dressings, and extended-length tracheostomy tubes. Interventions were often investigated as part of care bundles, and there was limited standardization of interventions between studies. Meta-analysis supported the benefit of hydrophilic dressings under tracheostomy flanges for decreasing tracheostomy-related pressure injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of hydrophilic dressings and foam collars decreases the incidence of tracheostomy-related pressure injury in critically ill patients. Evidence regarding individual interventions is limited by lack of sensitive measurement tools and by use of bundled interventions. Further research is necessary to delineate optimal interventions for preventing tracheostomy-related pressure injury.

Clinical utility and future direction of speaking valve: A review

This paper summarizes and analyzes the clinical research progress of the speaking valve in recent years, including the structure and function of the speaking valve, the impact of the speaking valve on the patient’s vocalization or speech, the impact on ventilator weaning and tracheal intubation and extubation, and the effect on aspiration and swallowing function, the impact on patient mobility and quality of life. Related issues in clinical use are also described.

Amplifying patient voices amid pandemic: Perspectives on tracheostomy care, communication, and connection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate perspectives of patients, family members, caregivers (PFC), and healthcare professionals (HCP) on tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The cross-sectional survey investigating barriers and facilitators to tracheostomy care was collaboratively developed by patients, family members, nurses, speech-language pathologists, respiratory care practitioners, physicians, and surgeons. The survey was distributed to the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative's learning community, and responses were analyzed.

RESULTS

Survey respondents (n = 191) from 17 countries included individuals with a tracheostomy (85 [45 %]), families/caregivers (43 [22 %]), and diverse HCP (63 [33.0 %]). Overall, 94 % of respondents reported concern that patients with tracheostomy were at increased risk of critical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19; 93 % reported fear or anxiety. With respect to prioritization of care, 38 % of PFC versus 16 % of HCP reported concern that patients with tracheostomies might not be valued or prioritized (p = 0.002). Respondents also differed in fear of contracting COVID-19 (69 % PFC vs. 49 % HCP group, p = 0.009); concern for hospitalization (55.5 % PFC vs. 27 % HCP, p < 0.001); access to medical personnel (34 % PFC vs. 14 % HCP, p = 0.005); and concern about canceled appointments (62 % PFC vs. 41 % HCP, p = 0.01). Respondents from both groups reported severe stress and fatigue, sleep deprivation, lack of breaks, and lack of support (70 % PFC vs. 65 % HCP, p = 0.54). Virtual telecare seldom met perceived needs.

CONCLUSION

PFC with a tracheostomy perceived most risks more acutely than HCP in this global sample. Broad stakeholder engagement is necessary to achieve creative, patient-driven solutions to maintain connection, communication, and access for patients with a tracheostomy.

Tracheostomy care and communication during COVID-19: Global interprofessional perspectives

Objective

Investigate healthcare providers, caregivers, and patient perspectives on tracheostomy care barriers during COVID-19.

Study design

Cross-sectional anonymous survey

Setting

Global Tracheostomy Collaborative Learning Community

Methods

A 17-item questionnaire was electronically distributed, assessing demographic and occupational data; challenges in ten domains of tracheostomy care; and perceptions regarding knowledge and preparedness for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Respondents (n = 115) were from 20 countries, consisting of patients/caregivers (10.4%) and healthcare professionals (87.0%), including primarily otolaryngologists (20.9%), nurses (24.3%), speech-language pathologists (18.3%), respiratory therapists (11.3%), and other physicians (12.2%). The most common tracheostomy care problem was inability to communicate (33.9%), followed by mucus plugging and wound care. Need for information on how to manage cuffs and initiate speech trials was rated highly by most respondents, along with other technical and knowledge areas. Access to care and disposable supplies were also prominent concerns, reflecting competition between community needs for routine tracheostomy supplies and shortages in intensive care units. Integrated teamwork was reported in 40 to 67% of respondents, depending on geography. Forty percent of respondents reported concern regarding personal protective equipment (PPE), and 70% emphasized proper PPE use.

Conclusion

While safety concerns, centering on personal protective equipment and pandemic resources are prominent concerns in COVID-19 tracheostomy care, patient-centered concerns must also be prioritized. Communication and speech, adequate supplies, and care standards are critical considerations in tracheostomy. Stakeholders in tracheostomy care can partner to identify creative solutions for delays in restoring communication, supply disruptions, and reduced access to tracheostomy care in both inpatient and community settings.