Diagnostic Performance and Safety Profile of Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Improving diagnostic strategies in bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

INTRODUCTION

In the past two decades, bronchoscopy of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) has improved its diagnostic yield due to the combination of various instruments and devices. Meanwhile, the application is complex and intertwined.

AREAS COVERED

This review article outlines strategies in diagnostic bronchoscopy for PPLs. We summarize the utility and evidence of key instruments and devices based on the results of clinical trials. Future perspectives of bronchoscopy for PPLs are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The accuracy of reaching PPLs by bronchoscopy has improved significantly with the introduction of combined instruments such as navigation, radial endobronchial ultrasound, digital tomosynthesis, and cone-beam computed tomography. It has been accelerated with the advent of approach tools such as newer ultrathin bronchoscopes and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy. In addition, needle aspiration and cryobiopsy provide further diagnostic opportunities beyond forceps biopsy. Rapid on-site evaluation may also play an important role in decision making during the procedures. As a result, the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy for PPLs has improved to a level comparable to that of transthoracic needle biopsy. The techniques and technologies developed in the diagnosis will be carried over to the next step in the transbronchial treatment of PPLs in the future.

The incremental contribution of mobile cone-beam computed tomography to the tool-lesion relationship during shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy

Introduction

This study aims to answer the question of whether adding mobile cone-beam computed tomography (mCBCT) imaging to shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) translates into a quantifiable improvement in the tool-lesion relationship.

Methods

Data from 102 peripheral lung lesions with ≥2 sequential mCBCT orbital spins and from 436 lesions with 0-1 spins were prospectively captured and retrospectively analysed. The primary outcome was the tool-lesion relationship status across the first and the last mCBCT spins. Secondary outcomes included 1) the change in distance between the tip of the sampling tool and the centre of the lesion between the first and the last spins and 2) the per-lesion diagnostic yield.

Results

Compared to lesions requiring 0-1 spins, lesions requiring ≥2 spins were smaller and had unfavourable bronchus sign and intra-operative sonographic view. On the first spin, 54 lesions (53%) were designated as non-tool-in-lesion (non-TIL) while 48 lesions (47%) were designated as TIL. Of the 54 initially non-TIL cases, 49 (90%) were converted to TIL status by the last spin. Overall, on the last spin, 96 out of 102 lesions (94%) were defined as TIL and six out of 102 lesions (6%) were defined as non-TIL (p<0.0001). The mean distance between the tool and the centre of the lesion decreased from 10.4 to 6.6 mm between the first and last spins (p<0.0001). The overall diagnostic yield was 77%.

Conclusion

Targeting traditionally challenging lung lesions, intra-operative volumetric imaging allowed for the conversion of 90% of non-TIL status to TIL. Guidance with mCBCT resulted in a significant decrease in the distance between the tip of the needle to lesion centre.

Diagnostic yield and safety of diagnostic techniques for pulmonary lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With recent advancements in bronchoscopic procedures, data on the best modality to sample peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is lacking, especially comparing bronchoscopy with computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy or needle aspiration (CT-TBNA).

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis, pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis on studies reporting diagnostic yield and complications with the use of CT-TBNA, radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS), virtual bronchoscopy (VB), electromagnetic navigation (EMN) or robot-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) to sample PPLs. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield and the secondary outcome was complications. We estimated the relative risk ratios using a random-effects model and used the frequentist approach for the network meta-analysis. We performed extensive analysis to assess the heterogeneity including reporting bias, publication bias, subgroup and meta-regressional analysis. We assessed the quality of the studies using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and QUADAS-Comparative (QUADAS-C).

RESULTS

We included 363 studies. The overall pooled diagnostic yield was 78.1%, the highest with CT-TBNA (88.9%), followed by RAB (84.8%) and the least with rEBUS (72%). In the pairwise meta-analysis, only rEBUS showed inferiority to CT-TBNA. The network meta-analysis ranked CT-TBNA as likely the most effective approach followed by VB, EMN and RAB, while rEBUS was the least effective, with a low-GRADE certainty. CT-TBNA had the highest rate of complications.

CONCLUSION

Although CT-TBNA is the most effective approach to sample PPLs, RAB has a comparable diagnostic yield with a lesser complication rate. Further prospective studies are needed comparing CT-TBNA and RAB.

Early comparison robotic bronchoscopy versus electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy for biopsy of pulmonary nodules in a thoracic surgery practice

Pulmonary nodules are frequently encountered in high-risk patients. Often these require biopsy which can be challenging. We relate our experience comparing use of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) to a robotic bronchoscopy system (RB). A retrospective review of patients undergoing bronchoscopic biopsy from 2015 to 2021. The timeframe overlapped with transition from ENB using Veran SPiN system to RB using Ion system by Intuitive. Patient and nodule characteristics were collected. Primary end point was overall diagnostic yield which was defined by pathologic confirmation of malignancy or benign finding. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic yield based on overall size of nodules and need for further work up and testing. 116 patients underwent ENB or RB of 134 nodules. No perioperative complications occurred. Diagnostic yield of ENB was 49.5% (41/91 nodules) versus 86.1% (37/43 nodules) for RB. Average nodule size for ENB was 2.55 cm versus 1.96 cm for RB. When divided based on size, ENB had a 30% diagnostic yield for nodules 1-2 cm (11/37 nodules, mean size 1.46 cm) and 64% yield for nodules 2-3 cm (14/22 nodules, mean size 2.38 cm). RB had an 81% yield for nodules 1-2 cm (mean size 1.41 cm) and 100% yield for nodules 2-3 cm (mean 2.3 cm). RB showed superiority over ENB in early implementation trials for biopsy of suspicious pulmonary nodules. It is a safe technology allowing for increased access to all lung fields and utilization in the thoracic surgical practice will be paramount to advancing the field.

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is a newly developed bronchoscopic technique for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the diagnostic yield and safety of RAB in patients with PPLs. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to April 2023. Two independent investigators screened retrieved articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. The pooled diagnostic yield and complication rate were estimated. Subgroup analysis was used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and the Egger test. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the robustness of the synthesized results. A total of 725 lesions from 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. No publication bias was found. Overall, RAB had a pooled diagnostic yield of 80.4% (95% CI: 75.7%-85.1%). Lesion size of >30 mm, presence of a bronchus sign, and a concentric radial endobronchial ultrasound view were associated with a statistically significantly higher diagnostic yield. Heterogeneity exploration showed that studies using cryoprobes reported better yields than those without cryoprobes (90.0%, 95% CI: 83.2%-94.7% vs. 79.0%, 95% CI: 75.8%-82.2%, p < 0.01). The pooled complication rate was 3.0% (95% CI: 1.6%-4.4%). In conclusion, RAB is an effective and safe technique for PPLs diagnosis. Further high-quality prospective studies still need to be conducted.

Unlocking the potential of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy: overcoming challenging anatomy and locations

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) was recently added to the armamentarium of tools used in sampling peripheral lung nodules. Protocols and guidelines have since been published advocating use of large oral artificial airways, use of confirmatory technologies such as radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS), and preferably limiting sampling to pulmonary parenchymal lesions. We present three clinical cases where RAB was used unconventionally to sample pulmonary nodules in unusual locations and in patients with challenging airway anatomy. In case 1, we introduced the ion catheter through a nasal airway in a patient with trismus. In case 2, we established a diagnosis by sampling a station 5 lymph node, and in case 3, we sampled a lesion located behind an airway stump from previous thoracic surgery. All three patients would have presented significant challenges for alternative biopsy modalities such as CT-guided needle biopsy or video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Procedural times with robotic-assisted bronchoscopy: a high volume single-center study

BACKGROUND

Incidental and screen-detected pulmonary nodules are common. The increasing capabilities of advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy will increase bronchoscopists' procedural volume necessitating optimization of procedural scheduling and workflow.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine total time in the procedure room, total bronchoscopy procedure time, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy procedure time longitudinally and per specific procedure performed.

DESIGN

A single-center observational study of all consecutive patients undergoing shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) biopsy procedures for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions with variable probability for malignancy.

METHODS

Chart review to collect patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and procedural specifics. Descriptive and comparative statistics are reported.

RESULTS

Actual bronchoscopy procedure time may decrease with increased institutional experience over time, however, there is limited ability to reduce non-bronchoscopy related time within the procedure room. The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and performance of staging endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in a single procedure are each associated with additional time requirements.

CONCLUSION

Institutional procedural block times should adapt to the nature of advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy procedures to allow for the accommodation of new modalities such as RAB combined with other technologies including radial endobronchial ultrasound, CBCT, ROSE, and staging linear EBUS. Identifying institutional median procedural times may assist in scheduling and ideal block time utilization.