Fast 0/1-h algorithm for detection of NSTEMI: are current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays fit for purpose? An EQA-based evaluation

To rule-in, or not to falsely rule-out, that is the question: evaluation of hs-cTnT EQA performance in light of the ESC-2020 guideline

OBJECTIVES

To accurately evaluate non-ST-elevated acute cardiac syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the quality of high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is of vital importance. The 2020 revision of the NSTE-ACS guideline includes clinical decision-limits (CDL's) to both rule-in and rule-out NSTE-ACS for most commercially available platforms, providing both 0/1 h and 0/2 h delta limits. Our study evaluated whether laboratories are able to meet the analytical performance specifications for imprecision (APS) for hs-cTnT.

METHODS

Results from external quality assurance (EQA) in commutable samples were used to evaluate the current and historic performance of analyzers. The performance of analyzers that either passed or failed to comply with 0/1 h-APS were used on a real-world dataset of first hs-cTnT-values to simulate 10.000 samples of t=0, t=1 and t=2 h values with multiple delta's for all relevant CDL's. We compared the simulated values to the input values to obtain the percentage of aberrant results simulated.

RESULTS

The majority of analyzers complies with APS for rule-in in 2022 (0/1 h: 90.4 % and 0/2 h: 100 %), compliance for the 0/1 h rule-out is still far from optimal (0/1 h: 30.7 %, 0/2 h: 75.4 %), with improving compliance over the past years (rule-in p=<0.0001, rule-out p=0.011, χ2). Whilst 0/1 h-APS-passing analyzers have a minute risk to falsely rule-out patients whom should be ruled-in (0.0001 %), failing performance increases this risk to 2.1 % upon using 0/1 h CDL's. Here, adopting 0/2 h CDL's is favorable (0.01 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratories that fail to meet hs-cTnT 0/1 h-APS should improve their performance to the required and achievable level. Until performance is reached clinics should adopt the 0/2 h CDL's.

Judging the clinical suitability of analytical performance of cardiac troponin assays

New millennium diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction precipitated a revolutionary shift from an approach based primarily on electrocardiography and clinical symptoms to a strategy based on biomarkers, and preferably cardiac troponins (cTn) I and T. In the last 20 years, clinical recommendations have strengthened the role of cTn and led to the development of highly sensitive (hs-cTn) assays, which are now leading players in all current clinical practice guidelines. To optimize the clinical use of these hs-cTn assays, focus on their analytical aspects has become increasingly important, emphasizing the need for the establishment of suitable analytical performance by the definition and implementation of appropriate specifications. An accurate estimate of measurement uncertainty, together with the acquisition of the highest analytical quality when very low concentrations of hs-cTn are measured, are essential requirements and should represent a practical laboratory standard in assuring optimal clinical use. Additional goals for further improving the quality of laboratory information should be the establishment of robust data concerning biological variation of cTn and the resolution of practical challenges opposed to the harmonization of cTn I results obtained by differing commercial measuring systems.

Clinical relevance of biological variation of cardiac troponins

The high-sensitivity immunoassays for cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) are recommended by all the most recent international guidelines as gold standard laboratory methods for the detection of myocardial injury and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In this review article, the Authors aimed at discussing the relevant biochemical, physiological, and clinical issues related to biological variability of cTnI and cTnT. Cardiac troponins, measured with hs-cTn methods, show a better clinical profile than the other cardio-specific biomarkers (such as the natriuretic peptides, BNP and NT-proBNP). In particular, the hs-cTn methods are characterized by a low intra-individual index of variation (<0.6) and reduced analytical imprecision (about 5% CV) at the clinical cut-off value (i.e., the 99th percentile URL value). Moreover, recent studies have reported that differences between two hs-cTn measured values (RCV) >30% can be considered statistically significant. These favourable biological characteristics and analytical performance of hs-cTn methods significantly improved the accuracy in the diagnostic process of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients admitted to emergence department. In addition, several studies have demonstrated the clinical usefulness of cardiovascular risk evaluation with hs-cTn methods in some groups of patients with clinical conditions at high cardiovascular risk (such as systemic hypertension, severe obesity, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). However, screening programs in the general population with hs-cTn methods for cardiovascular risk stratification require further investigation to define the optimal target populations, timing of measurement, and preventive interventions.

Exploring the association between extra-cardiac troponin elevations and risk of future mortality

Although the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) has now become the cornerstone for diagnosing cardiac injury, both ischemic and non-ischemic, recent evidence has become available that many patients display extra-cardiac causes of cTn elevations and carry a considerably enhanced risk of future mortality. The current literature data suggests that cTn elevations may be equally common in patients with cardiac and extra-cardiac diseases. Among the latter cohort of patients, the leading extra-cardiac diseases which may be responsible for either cTnI or cTnT elevations include infectious diseases/sepsis, pulmonary disorders, renal failure, malignancy, as well as gastrointestinal, neurological and musculoskeletal diseases. What also emerges rather clearly from the current literature data, is that the risk of dying for extra-cardiac diseases is higher (i.e., between two to three-fold) in patients with extra-cardiac cTn elevations than in those with cardiac pathologies, and that the most frequent cause of death would then be infections/sepsis, followed by malignancy, respiratory disorders, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal and neurological diseases, heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrhythmias, renal failure, psychiatric, metabolic, urogenital and musculoskeletal disorders. These figures would lead to conclude that there is a considerable risk that the underlying pathology causing cardiac injury and cTn elevation would then become the cause of death in these patients. This important evidence shall lead the way to defining appropriate and effective strategies for managing patients with extra-cardiac cTn elevations, so that their risk of future death could be prevented or limited.