Blood sampling for metanephrines comparing venipuncture vs. indwelling intravenous cannula in healthy subjects

Development and validation of ivermectin quantification method in volumetric absorptive microsampling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Background

Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum anthelmintic used to control onchocerciasis from nematode parasites. As an anthelmintic, ivermectin is designed to have high levels in the gastrointestinal tract, so that the systemic intake is relatively low. Due to the very small concentration of ivermectin, a selective and sensitive approach is needed for the analysis of ivermectin in blood. Several methods have been developed using plasma and Dried Blood Spots, but there are still shortcomings due to hematocrit effects. Therefore, this study was conducted to establish a validated ivermectin analysis method with doramectin as the internal standard in using Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Methods

Mass spectrometry equipped with triple quadrupole and positive electrospray ionization mode was used to conduct the analysis. For the biological matrix, whole blood was used by Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling and extracted using a protein precipitation technique with a combination of acetonitrile and methanol (1:1). VAMS has some advantages such as not being affected by hematocrit, requires a small and fixed volume of sample, also a more efficient sampling process.

Results

The optimum conditions were achieved with an Acquity® UPLC BEH C18 column (1,7 μm; 2.1 × 100 mm); extracted-flow rate was 0,2 mL/min; mobile phase was 5 mM ammonium formate pH 3.00 and acetonitrile (10:90) with isocratic elution. Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) detection by m/z values was 892.41 > 569.5 for ivermectin and 916,41 > 331,35 for doramectin.

Conclusion

The method has been appropriately validated in compliance with the 2018 guidelines laid out by the US Food and Drug Administration. Resulting the minimum detection (LLOQ) was 1 ng/mL with a linear concentration range spanning from 1 to 150 ng/mL.

Very elevated serum copeptin concentrations occur in a subset of healthy children in the minutes after phlebotomy

OBJECTIVES

Although AVP and its surrogate, copeptin, are mainly regulated by osmotic and volume stimuli, their secretion is also elicited by stress and growth hormone (GH) stimulating agents. The aim of this report is to describe unusual patterns of copeptin response in a subset of children undergoing GH stimulation tests (GH-ST).

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of a cohort of 93 healthy short children with no polydipsia, polyuria or fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, undergoing GH-ST with intravenous arginine, insulin, oral clonidine, or L-Dopa/carbidopa in various combinations. Serum copeptin concentrations were measured 1-3 min after phlebotomy (0 min) and at 60, 90, 120 min during GH-ST.

RESULTS

In 85 subjects (normal response group, NRG) serum copeptin concentrations increased from a 0 min median of 9 pmol/L (IQR 6, 11.5) (all values ≤21) to a median peak between 60 and 120 min of 22 (IQR15, 38) pmol/L, which varied depending on the stimulating agent. Conversely, in the eight outliers, copeptin concentrations decreased gradually from a median of 154 (IQR 61, 439) pmol/L (all ≥40 pmol/L) to values as low as 14 % of the basal value, by 120 min. Test-associated anxiety was described in 17 subjects in the NRG (20 %) and five of the outliers (63 %).

CONCLUSIONS

A distinctive pattern of very elevated serum copeptin concentrations occurred in 9 % of children undergoing GH-ST, similar to reports in previous pediatric studies. Etiology may include pain or stress of phlebotomy. This phenomenon should be recognized for proper interpretation of copeptin values in children.

Biochemical Assessment of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) require prompt consideration and efficient diagnosis and treatment to minimize associated morbidity and mortality. Once considered, appropriate biochemical testing is key to diagnosis. Advances in understanding catecholamine metabolism have clarified why measurements of the O-methylated catecholamine metabolites rather than the catecholamines themselves are important for effective diagnosis. These metabolites, normetanephrine and metanephrine, produced respectively from norepinephrine and epinephrine, can be measured in plasma or urine, with choice according to available methods or presentation of patients. For patients with signs and symptoms of catecholamine excess, either test will invariably establish the diagnosis, whereas the plasma test provides higher sensitivity than urinary metanephrines for patients screened due to an incidentaloma or genetic predisposition, particularly for small tumors or in patients with an asymptomatic presentation. Additional measurements of plasma methoxytyramine can be important for some tumors, such as paragangliomas, and for surveillance of patients at risk of metastatic disease. Avoidance of false-positive test results is best achieved by plasma measurements with appropriate reference intervals and preanalytical precautions, including sampling blood in the fully supine position. Follow-up of positive results, including optimization of preanalytics for repeat tests or whether to proceed directly to anatomic imaging or confirmatory clonidine tests, depends on the test results, which can also suggest likely size, adrenal vs extra-adrenal location, underlying biology, or even metastatic involvement of a suspected tumor. Modern biochemical testing now makes diagnosis of PPGL relatively simple. Integration of artificial intelligence into the process should make it possible to fine-tune these advances.

Clonidine suppression test for a reliable diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: When to use

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, false-positive results in biochemical testing for suspected pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) are not infrequent and may lead to unnecessary examinations. We aimed to evaluate the role of the clonidine suppression test (CST) in the era of analyses of plasma-free metanephrines for the diagnosis or exclusion of PPGL in patients with adrenal tumours and/or arterial hypertension.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-centre, prospective trial investigated the use of CST in 60 patients with suspected PPGL associated with out-patient elevations of plasma normetanephrine (NMN) and/or metanephrine (MN), in most cases accompanied with hypertension or an adrenal mass. Measurements of plasma catecholamines and free metanephrines were performed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and tandem mass spectrometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients entered final analysis (n = 20 with PPGL and n = 26 with a nonfunctional adrenal mass and/or hypertension). CST reliably excluded false-positive baseline NMN results with a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of CST improved from 85% to 94% when tumours with isolated MN increase (n = 3) were not considered. In patients with elevated baseline NMN (n = 24), CST correctly identified all patients without PPGL. Patients with falsely elevated baseline NMN results (n = 7, 26.9%) exhibited increases of baseline NMN up to 1.7-fold above the upper reference limit.

CONCLUSION

CST qualifies as a useful diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis of borderline elevated plasma-free NMN in patients with suspected PPGL. In this context, CST helps to correctly identify all false-positive NMN screening results.

Preanalytical Considerations and Outpatient Versus Inpatient Tests of Plasma Metanephrines to Diagnose Pheochromocytoma

CONTEXT

Sampling of blood in the supine position for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) results in lower rates of false positives for plasma normetanephrine than seated sampling. It is unclear how inpatient vs outpatient testing and other preanalytical factors impact false positives.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify preanalytical precautions to minimize false-positive results for plasma metanephrines.

METHODS

Impacts of different blood sampling conditions on plasma metanephrines were evaluated, including outpatient vs inpatient testing, sampling of blood in semi- vs fully recumbent positions, use of cannulae vs direct venipuncture, and differences in outside temperature. A total of 3147 patients at 10 tertiary referral centers were tested for PPGL, including 278 with and 2869 without tumors. Rates of false-positive results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Outpatient rather than inpatient sampling resulted in 44% higher plasma concentrations and a 3.4-fold increase in false-positive results for normetanephrine. Low temperature, a semi-recumbent position, and direct venipuncture also resulted in significantly higher plasma concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine than alternative sampling conditions, although with less impact than outpatient sampling. Higher concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine with low compared with warm temperatures were only apparent for outpatient sampling. Preanalytical factors were without impact on plasma metanephrines in patients with PPGL.

CONCLUSION

Although inpatient blood sampling is largely impractical for screening patients with suspected PPGL, other preanalytical precautions (eg, cannulae, warm testing conditions) may be useful. Inpatient sampling may be reserved for follow-up of patients with difficult to distinguish true- from false-positive results.

Biochemical Diagnosis of Catecholamine-Producing Tumors of Childhood: Neuroblastoma, Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Catecholamine-producing tumors of childhood include most notably neuroblastoma, but also pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Diagnosis of the former depends largely on biopsy-dependent histopathology, but this is contraindicated in PPGL where diagnosis depends crucially on biochemical tests of catecholamine excess. Such tests retain some importance in neuroblastoma though continue to largely rely on measurements of homovanillic acid (HVA) and vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), which are no longer recommended for PPGL. For PPGL, urinary or plasma metanephrines are the recommended most accurate tests. Addition of methoxytyramine to the plasma panel is particularly useful to identify dopamine-producing tumors and combined with normetanephrine also shows superior diagnostic performance over HVA and VMA for neuroblastoma. While use of metanephrines and methoxytyramine for diagnosis of PPGL in adults is established, there are numerous pitfalls for use of these tests in children. The establishment of pediatric reference intervals is particularly difficult and complicated by dynamic changes in metabolites during childhood, especially in infants for both plasma and urinary measurements, and extending to adolescence for urinary measurements. Interpretation of test results is further complicated in children by difficulties in following recommended preanalytical precautions. Due to this, the slow growing nature of PPGL and neglected consideration of the tumors in childhood the true pediatric prevalence of PPGL is likely underappreciated. Earlier identification of disease, as facilitated by surveillance programs, may uncover the true prevalence and improve therapeutic outcomes of childhood PPGL. For neuroblastoma there remain considerable obstacles in moving from entrenched to more accurate tests of catecholamine excess.

Properly Collected Plasma Metanephrines Excludes PPGL After False-Positive Screening Tests

CONTEXT

False-positive results are common for pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) real-world screening.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the correlation between screening urine and seated plasma metanephrines in outpatients where PPGL was absent, compared to meticulously prepared and supine-collected plasma metanephrines with age-adjusted references.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Databases from a single-provider provincial laboratory (2012-2018), a validated PPGL registry, and a manual chart review from a specialized endocrine testing unit.

PATIENTS

PPGL registry data excluded known PPGL cases from the laboratory database. Outpatients having both urine and plasma metanephrines <90 days apart.

METHODS

The correlation between urine and seated plasma measures along with the total positivity rate. All cases of plasma metanephrines drawn in the endocrine unit were reviewed for test indication and test positivity rate.

RESULTS

There were 810 non-PPGL pairs of urine and plasma metanephrines in the laboratory database; 46.1% of urine metanephrines were reported high. Of seated outpatient plasma metanephrines drawn a median of 5.9 days later, 19.2% were also high (r = 0.33 and 0.50 for normetanephrine and metanephrine, respectively). In contrast, the meticulously prepared and supine collected patients (n = 139, 51% prior high urine metanephrines) had <3% rate of abnormal high results in patients without known PPGL/adrenal mass.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a poor-to-moderate correlation between urine and seated plasma metanephrines. Up to 20% of those with high urine measures also had high seated plasma metanephrines in the absence of PPGL. Properly prepared and collected supine plasma metanephrines had a false-positive rate of <3% in the absence of known PPGL/adrenal mass.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Salivary Metanephrines in Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas

BACKGROUND

Measurements of plasma free metanephrines are recommended for diagnosing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGL). Metanephrines can be detected in saliva with LC-MS/MS with sufficient analytical sensitivity and precision. Because collecting saliva is noninvasive and less cumbersome than plasma or urine sampling, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of salivary metanephrines in diagnosing PPGL.

METHODS

This 2-center study included 118 healthy participants (44 men; mean age: 33 years (range: 19--74 years)), 44 patients with PPGL, and 54 patients suspected of PPGL. Metanephrines were quantified in plasma and saliva using LC-MS/MS. Diagnostic accuracy; correlation between plasma and salivary metanephrines; and potential factors influencing salivary metanephrines, including age, sex, and posture during sampling, were assessed.

RESULTS

Salivary metanephrines were significantly higher in patients with PPGL compared with healthy participants (metanephrine (MN): 0.19 vs 0.09 nmol/L, P < 0.001; normetanephrine (NMN): 2.90 vs 0.49 nmol/L, P < 0.001). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of salivary metanephrines were 89% and 87%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary metanephrines was 88%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.880. We found a significant correlation between plasma and salivary metanephrines (Pearson correlation coefficient: MN, 0.86, P < 0.001; NMN, 0.83, P < 0.001). Salivary NMN concentrations were higher when collected in a seated position compared with supine (P < 0.001) and increased with age (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Salivary metanephrines are a promising tool in the biochemical diagnosis of PPGL. Salivary metanephrines correlate with plasma free metanephrines and are increased in patients with PPGL. At this time, however, salivary metanephrines cannot replace measurement of plasma free metanephrines.