IgA rheumatoid factor in rheumatoid arthritis

IL-4 polymorphisms (rs2227284, rs2243267, and rs2243270) are associated with reduced risk of rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease, and understanding its genetic and molecular basis is crucial for early diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the association between IL-4 polymorphisms (rs2227284, rs2243267, rs2243270, and rs2243283) and RA risk.

METHODS

The four IL-4 polymorphisms were genotyped in 493 RA patients and 493 healthy controls using Agena MassARRAY. Logistic regression analysis calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the relationship between IL-4 polymorphisms and RA risk.

RESULTS

Overall analysis revealed that rs2243267 (GG vs. CC: OR = 0.26, FDR-p = .032; Recessive: OR = 0.27, FDR-p = .048) and rs2243270 (AA vs. GG: OR = 0.26, FDR-p = .024; Recessive: OR = 0.27, FDR-p = .024) were associated with a decreased risk of RA. Stratified analysis indicated that rs2243267 and rs2243270 were correlated with reduced RA risk in female, smoking, BMI <24, and drinking population; rs2227284 was associated with a decreased RA risk in BMI <24 and drinking population. Moreover, rs2243267 and rs2243270 were significantly associated with reduced ACPA positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IL-4 polymorphisms (rs2227284, rs2243267, and rs2243270) act as protective factors for RA in the Chinese Han population.

The function of long non-coding RNA IFNG-AS1 in autoimmune diseases

The prevalence of autoimmune diseases ranks as the third most common disease category globally, following cancer and heart disease. Numerous studies indicate that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays a pivotal role in regulating human growth, development, and the pathogenesis of various diseases. It is more than 200 nucleotides in length and is mostly involve in the regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, lncRNAs are crucial in the development and activation of immune cells, with an expanding body of research exploring their association with autoimmune disorders in humans. LncRNA Ifng antisense RNA 1 (IFNG-AS1), a key regulatory factor in the immune system, also named NeST or TMEVPG1, is proximally located to IFNG and participates in the regulation of it. The dysregulation of IFNG-AS1 is implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases. This study examines the role and mechanism of IFNG-AS1 in various autoimmune diseases and considers its potential as a therapeutic target.

Autoantibodies Serum Level and 10-Year Risk of Fractures Evaluated by FRAX® Tool in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Purpose

FRAX® is a tool used for evaluation of risk of fracture in RA and non-RA patients and to identify those eligible for intervention. One of the limitations of FRAX in RA settings is that it does not consider factors known to contribute to osteoporosis such as autoantibodies. This study analysed the association of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibody (anti-MCV), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP), IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgA RF with 10-year risk of major osteoporosis and hip fracture.

Methods

FRAX® tool was used to estimate 10-year risk of major osteoporosis fracture and hip fracture in 189 RA patients over 40 years of age. Anti-MCV, anti-CCP, IgM RF and IgA RF were tested using enzyme immunoassay and analysed at different levels. Results were adjusted for various confounders including disease activity.

Results

Fifty-one (26.9%) RA patients had high (≥20%) 10-year risk of major osteoporosis fracture and 67 (35.4%) had high (>3%) 10-year risk of hip fracture. Among all the tested autoantibodies, only IgM RF at elevated levels was associated with high 10-year risk of major osteoporosis fracture (adjusted OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 1.5-11.3, p = 0.006) and of hip fracture (adjusted OR = 17.4, 95% CI = 3.7-81.3, p < 0.0001). There was no agreement between FRAX and femoral neck (FN) BMD. None of the autoantibodies tested were associated with FN osteopenia or osteoporosis including IgM RF at high levels.

Conclusion

Our study highlights the importance of quantitative measurement of autoantibodies in assessment of risk for fractures among RA patients. Our preliminary findings need to be assessed in prospective studies to determine the actual predictive value of high IgM RF levels among patients with RA.

The prognostic value of IgA anti-citrullinated protein antibodies and rheumatoid factor in an early arthritis population with a treat-to-target approach

The mucosal origin hypothesis of rheumatoid arthritis has renewed the interest in IgA autoantibodies, but their added value over IgG anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and IgM rheumatoid factor (RF) for modern treatment outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for treatment outcomes in an early arthritis population. IgA-ACPA/RF isotypes were measured in baseline sera from 480 inflammatory arthritis (IA) patients, who were included in the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort trial (tREACH). The tREACH trial was a multicentre, stratified, single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach. The prognostic value of IgA-ACPA/RF was determined by evaluating differences in (1) quick-attained (< 6 months after diagnosis) and persistent remission rates, (2) DMARD-free remission and (3) biological use between IA patients with and without IgA-ACPA/RF over 3 years of follow-up. IgA-ACPA was present in 23% of patients and overlapped with IgG-ACPA positivity in 94%. Similarly, IgA-RF overlapped with IgM-RF in 90% of patients. IgA-ACPA positivity was associated with lower DFR rates and more biological use, but this effect was largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA, since this effect disappeared after stratification for IgG-ACPA (HR 0.6, 95%CI 0.2-1.6 for DFR). No differences were observed in 'quick-attained and persistent remission' rates and for IgA-RF. Their seems to be no additional value of IgA-ACPA and IgA-RF for modern, long-term clinical outcomes. The effects of IgA-ACPA seen in our study are largely mediated by the presence of IgG-ACPA. Based on these results, there is no rationale for measuring these isotypes in daily practice.

Autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis - rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein antibodies and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

RA is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies among which rheumatoid factors (RFs) and antimodified protein antibodies (AMPA) are serological hallmarks of the disease. In recent years, several novel insights into the biology, immunogenetics and clinical relevance of these autoantibodies have been obtained, which deserve to be discussed in more detail.

RECENT FINDINGS

RFs from RA patients seem to target distinct epitopes which appear to be quite specific for RA. Determination of immunoglobulin A (IgA) isotypes of RF and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) may provide prognostic information because their presence is associated with reduced therapeutic responses to TNF inhibitors. Furthermore, IgA levels are increased in RA patients and IgA immune complexes are more potent than immunoglobulin G (IgG) complexes in inducing NET formation. Concerning AMPAs, investigations on variable domain glycosylation (VDG) revealed effects on antigen binding and activation of autoreactive B cells. Studies on pathogenetic involvement of ACPA suggest Janus-faced roles: on the one hand, ACPA may be involved in joint destruction and pain perception while on the other hand protective anti-inflammatory effects may be attributed to a subset of ACPAs.

SUMMARY

The autoimmune response in RA is extremely complex and still far from being fully understood. Antibodies are not only valuable diagnostic biomarkers but also seem to play pivotal roles in the pathophysiology of RA.

Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: is it time to revise the criteria?

Classification criteria have been developed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatic diseases in order to gather a homogeneous patient population for clinical studies and facilitate the timely implementation of therapeutic measures. Although classification criteria are not intended to be used for diagnosis, they are frequently used to support the diagnostic process in clinical practice, including clinical decision-making. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for RA are capable of identifying the majority of symptomatic patients with RA already in the earliest stages of the disease who are not yet showing radiographic changes. These patients will also profit from the early implementation of therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, the risk of misclassification is higher as compared with the former 1987 ACR criteria, which were considerably less sensitive to the recognition of patients with early RA. Of note, the presence of rheumatoid factors (RFs) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) has been attributed equal weight in the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and may contribute up to 50% of the score needed for being classified as RA. However, while ACPAs have been proven to be the most specific serological markers of RA, the specificity of RF is moderate, especially at lower titres. This may lead to the misclassification of RF-positive patients and, consequently, the unjustified implementation of DMARD therapy. Therefore, issues arise on how comprehensive the criteria should be and whether they should be updated and adapted to findings from the past two decades that might increase both their specificity and sensitivity.

Does Eta Protein Differentiate Rheumatoid Arthritis from Psoriatic Arthritis?

AIM

The clinical symptoms and laboratory markers of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) can be very similar, so making a differential diagnosis between these two diseases is often difficult. Serological parameters to be used in differential diagnosis can guide the clinician. This study aimed to investigate the usability of 14-3-3η (eta) protein as a biomarker in the differential diagnosis of PsA and RA, and the relationships between eta protein and disease activity scores and joint erosions in PsA and RA.

METHODS

54 PsA patients, 53 RA patients, and 56 healthy individuals were included in this study. The ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImunoSorbent Assay) kit was used as a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique to detect human eta protein levels. Receiver- operating Characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the eta protein.

RESULTS

Eta protein levels were found to be significantly higher in the RA group than in the PsA [B: -0.341, OR (95% CI): 0.711 (0.556-0.909), p: 0.007] and control [B: -0.225, OR (95% CI): 0.798 (0.641-0.995), p: 0.045] groups. Eta protein median values were significantly higher in patients with joint erosion than in those without [β= 0.151, OR (95% CI): 1.163 (1.003-1.349), p: 0.046].

CONCLUSION

Eta protein levels are higher in the serum of RA patients than PsA and are associated with joint erosion. Eta protein may be a potential biomarker in the differential diagnosis of RA and PsA. It may represent a possible therapeutic step in the pathophysiological pathways in the development of joint erosion.

Testing for isotypes does not help differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from other rheumatoid factor positive diseases

Rheumatoid factors (RFs) are useful for diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nephelometric and turbidimetric techniques, which detect total RF but do not reveal the antibody isotype, are common diagnostic methods in clinical routine. Given the recent development of isotype-specific immunoassays, the detection of IgG, IgM, and IgA RFs represents an interesting challenge. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether specific RF tests performed as a second step after traditional nephelometry could help differentiating RA from other RF-positive diseases. We tested 117 consecutive serum samples that were RF-positive at nephelometry (BNII nephelometric analyzer, Siemens) for IgA, IgG, and IgM RF isotypes by a fluoroimmunoenzymatic assay (FEIA) on the Phadia 250 instrument (ThermoFisher). Fifty-five subjects had RA and 62 presented non-RA diagnoses. Eighteen sera (15.4%) were positive only by nephelometry, two were positive only for IgA RF, and the remaining 97 sera were all positive for IgM RF isotype (with or without IgG and IgA RF). Positive findings did not correlate with RA or non-RA diagnosis. Spearman rho correlation coefficient between nephelometric total RF and IgM isotype was moderate (0.657), and weak between total RF and IgA (0.396) and IgG (0.360) isotypes. Despite its low specificity, measurement of total RF by nephelometry still seems to be the method that performs best. As IgM, IgA, and IgG RF isotypes showed only a moderate correlation with total RF measurement, their diagnostic use as a second level test remains controversial.

Cystic fibrosis autoantibody signatures associate with Staphylococcus aureus lung infection or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

Introduction

While cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease is characterized by persistent inflammation and infections and chronic inflammatory diseases are often accompanied by autoimmunity, autoimmune reactivity in CF has not been studied in depth.

Methods

In this work we undertook an unbiased approach to explore the systemic autoantibody repertoire in CF using autoantibody microarrays.

Results and discussion

Our results show higher levels of several new autoantibodies in the blood of people with CF (PwCF) compared to control subjects. Some of these are IgA autoantibodies targeting neutrophil components or autoantigens linked to neutrophil-mediated tissue damage in CF. We also found that people with CF with higher systemic IgM autoantibody levels have lower prevalence of S. aureus infection. On the other hand, IgM autoantibody levels in S. aureus-infected PwCF correlate with lung disease severity. Diabetic PwCF have significantly higher levels of IgA autoantibodies in their circulation compared to nondiabetic PwCF and several of their IgM autoantibodies associate with worse lung disease. In contrast, in nondiabetic PwCF blood levels of IgA autoantibodies correlate with lung disease. We have also identified other autoantibodies in CF that associate with P. aeruginosa airway infection. In summary, we have identified several new autoantibodies and associations of autoantibody signatures with specific clinical features in CF.

Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify specific subgroups of patients. The main objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the literature on the role of RF isotypes in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the role of RF isotypes in RA (only in English, from PubMed, search terms: "rheumatoid factor isotypes", "diagnosis", "prognosis" and "rheumatoid arthritis", last search 31 July 2022, two independent assessment of quality and biases, results included in tables and in the meta-analysis).

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles were examined (7517 patients). Testing all RF isotypes with latex test or nephelometry allows for the highest sensitivity (68.6%, 95% CI 66.2% to 71.0%); nonetheless, the determination of IgA isotype provides the highest specificity (91.4%, 95% CI 90.8% to 92.0%) and the highest positive likelihood ratio (7.7, 95% CI 5.7 to 10.4). When testing IgM isotype the highest diagnostic OR (21.7, 95% CI 16.1 to 29.3) is reached. When analysing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF isotype determination increases diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, these do not provide relevant prognostic information, as results are conflicting.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing RF allows the highest sensitivity, while IgA isotype the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio for RA diagnosis. On the other hand, determination of RF isotypes dose not allow prognostic information, as data are limited and heterogeneous.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of IgG and IgA anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

Anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) are specific markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and typically measured by assays employing a cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) as antigen. This study was aimed at investigating the diagnostic performance of anti-CCP2 and anti-CCP3 IgG and IgA assays in patients with early RA with a particular focus on the potential prognostic value of IgA ACPA.

Methods

The anti-CCP3.1 assay (Inova Diagnostics) measuring IgG and IgA antibodies simultaneously was compared to anti-CCP2 IgG and IgA assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific) employing sera of 184 early RA patients, 360 disease controls and 98 healthy subjects.

Results

Anti-CCP2 IgG and IgA assays showed high specificity versus disease controls (98.9%; 99.4%). Sensitivity was 52.2% (IgG) and 28.8% (IgA), resulting in positive likelihood ratios (LR+) of 47.5 (IgG) and 48.0 (IgA). The anti-CCP3.1 assay proved slightly more sensitive than the anti-CCP2 IgG assay (56%) but specificity was markedly lower (90.8% versus disease controls). However, when using a threefold higher cut-off specificity of the anti-CCP3.1 assay increased (97.5%) while sensitivity (52.7%) became comparable to the anti-CCP2 IgG assay resulting in a LR+ of 21.5. Anti-CCP2 IgA antibodies did not increase the diagnostic sensitivity of ACPA testing, but IgA positive patients showed diminished responses to treatment with anti-TNF biologicals compared to patients who had only IgG antibodies.

Conclusion

Specificity of ACPA assays should be adjusted to reduce the risk of misclassification and a false positive diagnosis. Determination of ACPA IgA might provide important prognostic information concerning therapeutic responses.

Salivary IgA subtypes as novel disease biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is the main antibody isotype in body fluids such as tears, intestinal mucous, colostrum, and saliva. There are two subtypes of IgA in humans: IgA1, mainly present in blood and mucosal sites, and IgA2, preferentially expressed in mucosal sites like the colon. In clinical practice, immunoglobulins are typically measured in venous or capillary blood; however, alternative samples, including saliva, are now being considered, given their non-invasive and easy collection nature. Several autoimmune diseases have been related to diverse abnormalities in oral mucosal immunity, such as rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

We decided to evaluate the levels of both IgA subtypes in the saliva of SLE patients. A light chain capture-based ELISA measured specific IgA1 and IgA2 levels in a cohort of SLE patients compared with age and gender-matched healthy volunteers.

Results

Surprisingly, our results indicated that in the saliva of SLE patients, total IgA and IgA1 subtype were significantly elevated; we also found that salivary IgA levels, particularly IgA2, positively correlate with anti-dsDNA IgG antibody titers. Strikingly, we also detected the presence of salivary anti-nucleosome IgA antibodies in SLE patients, a feature not previously reported elsewhere.

Conclusions

According to our results and upon necessary validation, IgA characterization in saliva could represent a potentially helpful tool in the clinical care of SLE patients with the advantage of being a more straightforward, faster, and safer method than manipulating blood samples.