Serum GFAP - reference interval and preanalytical properties in Danish adults

Effect of alemtuzumab over sNfL and sGFAP levels in multiple sclerosis

Introduction

Alemtuzumab is a highly effective pulsed immune reconstitution therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS).

Aim

To evaluate serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS who have been treated with Alemtuzumab over the course of 2 years.

Methods

This prospective study involved MS patients treated with Alemtuzumab at a referral MS center. Both sNfL and sGFAP were analyzed at baseline and then again at 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment using the single molecule array (SiMoA) technique. We also recruited matched healthy controls (HCs) for comparison.

Results

The study included 46 patients (with a median age of 34.2 [Interquartile range (IQR), 28.7-42.3] years, 27 of which were women [58%]) and 76 HCs. No differences in demographic characteristics were observed between patients and HC. The median disease duration was 6.22 (IQR, 1.56-10.13) years. The median annualized relapse rate before treatment was 2 (IQR, 1-3). At baseline, sNfL and sGFAP levels were higher in MS patients (median of 18.8 [IQR, 10.7-52.7] pg/ml and 158.9 [IQR, 126.9-255.5] pg/ml, respectively) when compared to HC (6.11 [IQR, 2.03-8.54] pg/ml and 91.0 [72.6-109] pg/ml, respectively) (p<0.001 for both comparisons). The data indicates that 80% of patients had high (≥10 pg/ml) sNfL values at baseline. We observed a significant decrease in sNfL levels at 6 (65%, p = 0.02), 12 (70.8%, p<0.001), and 24 (78.1%, p<0.001) months. sNfL reached similar levels to HC only after 24 months of Alemtuzumab treatment. During the follow-up period, no changes were identified in the sGFAP values.

Conclusion

Alemtuzumab leads to the normalization of sNfL values in MS patients after 2 years of treatment, with no apparent effect on sGFAP values.

Blood Biomarkers for the Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of validated guidelines in the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), processes to limit unnecessary brain scans are still not sufficient and need to be improved. The use of blood biomarkers represents a relevant adjunct to identify patients at risk for intracranial injury requiring computed tomography (CT) scan.

CONTENT

Biomarkers currently recommended in the management of mTBI in adults and children are discussed in this review. Protein S100 beta (S100B) is the best-documented blood biomarker due to its validation in large observational and interventional studies. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyterminal hydrolase L-1 (UCH-L1) have also recently demonstrated their usefulness in patients with mTBI. Preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical performance are presented to aid in their interpretation in clinical practice. Finally, new perspectives on biomarkers and mTBI are discussed.

SUMMARY

In adults, the inclusion of S100B in Scandinavian and French guidelines has reduced the need for CT scans by at least 30%. S100B has significant potential as a diagnostic biomarker, but limitations include its rapid half-life, which requires blood collection within 3 h of trauma, and its lack of neurospecificity. In 2018, the FDA approved the use of combined determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 to aid in the assessment of mTBI. Since 2022, new French guidelines also recommend the determination of GFAP and UCH-L1 in order to target a larger number of patients (sampling within 12 h post-injury) and optimize the reduction of CT scans. In the future, new cut-offs related to age and promising new biomarkers are expected for both diagnostic and prognostic applications.

Tracking neuroinflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: a strategy for individualized therapeutic approaches?

BACKGROUND

Recent trials of anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies, including lecanemab and donanemab, in early Alzheimer disease (AD) showed that these drugs have limited clinical benefits and their use comes with a significant risk of serious adverse events. Thus, it seems crucial to explore complementary therapeutic approaches. Genome-wide association studies identified robust associations between AD and several AD risk genes related to immune response, including but not restricted to CD33 and TREM2. Here, we critically reviewed the current knowledge on candidate neuroinflammatory biomarkers and their role in characterizing the pathophysiology of AD.

MAIN BODY

Neuroinflammation is recognized to be a crucial and contributing component of AD pathogenesis. The fact that neuroinflammation is most likely present from earliest pre-stages of AD and co-occurs with the deposition of Aβ reinforces the need to precisely define the sequence and nature of neuroinflammatory events. Numerous clinical trials involving anti-inflammatory drugs previously yielded unfavorable outcomes in early and mild-to-moderate AD. Although the reasons behind these failures remain unclear, these may include the time and the target selected for intervention. Indeed, in our review, we observed a stage-dependent neuroinflammatory process in the AD brain. While the initial activation of glial cells counteracts early brain Aβ deposition, the downregulation in the functional state of microglia occurs at more advanced disease stages. To address this issue, personalized neuroinflammatory modulation therapy is required. The emergence of reliable blood-based neuroinflammatory biomarkers, particularly glial fibrillary acidic protein, a marker of reactive astrocytes, may facilitate the classification of AD patients based on the ATI(N) biomarker framework. This expands upon the traditional classification of Aβ ("A"), tau ("T"), and neurodegeneration ("N"), by incorporating a novel inflammatory component ("I").

CONCLUSIONS

The present review outlines the current knowledge on potential neuroinflammatory biomarkers and, importantly, emphasizes the role of longitudinal analyses, which are needed to accurately monitor the dynamics of cerebral inflammation. Such a precise information on time and place will be required before anti-inflammatory therapeutic interventions can be considered for clinical evaluation. We propose that an effective anti-neuroinflammatory therapy should specifically target microglia and astrocytes, while considering the individual ATI(N) status of patients.

Development of next-generation reference interval models to establish reference intervals based on medical data: current status, algorithms and future consideration

Evidence derived from laboratory medicine plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognosis of various diseases. Reference intervals (RIs) are indispensable tools for assessing test results. The accuracy of clinical decision-making relies directly on the appropriateness of RIs. With the increase in real-world studies and advances in computational power, there has been increased interest in establishing RIs using big data. This approach has demonstrated cost-effectiveness and applicability across diverse scenarios, thereby enhancing the overall suitability of the RI to a certain extent. However, challenges persist when tests results are influenced by age and sex. Reliance on a single RI or a grouping of RIs based on age and sex can lead to erroneous interpretation of results with significant implications for clinical decision-making. To address this issue, the development of next generation of reference interval models has arisen at an historic moment. Such models establish a curve relationship to derive continuously changing reference intervals for test results across different age and sex categories. By automatically selecting appropriate RIs based on the age and sex of patients during result interpretation, this approach facilitates clinical decision-making and enhances disease diagnosis/treatment as well as health management practices. Development of next-generation reference interval models use direct or indirect sampling techniques to select reference individuals and then employed curve fitting methods such as splines, polynomial regression and others to establish continuous models. In light of these studies, several observations can be made: Firstly, to date, limited interest has been shown in developing next-generation reference interval models, with only a few models currently available. Secondly, there are a wide range of methods and algorithms for constructing such models, and their diversity may lead to confusion. Thirdly, the process of constructing next-generation reference interval models can be complex, particularly when employing indirect sampling techniques. At present, normative documents pertaining to the development of next-generation reference interval models are lacking. In summary, this review aims to provide an overview of the current state of development of next-generation reference interval models by defining them, highlighting inherent advantages, and addressing existing challenges. It also describes the process, advanced algorithms for model building, the tools required and the diagnosis and validation of models. Additionally, a discussion on the prospects of utilizing big data for developing next-generation reference interval models is presented. The ultimate objective is to equip clinical laboratories with the theoretical framework and practical tools necessary for developing and optimizing next-generation reference interval models to establish next-generation reference intervals while enhancing the use of medical data resources to facilitate precision medicine.

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acid protein levels in early and advanced stages of cerebral amyloid Angiopathy

BACKGROUND

Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a biomarker for neuroaxonal damage and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for reactive astrocytosis. Both processes occur in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), but studies investigating the potential of NFL and GFAP as markers for CAA are lacking. We aimed to investigate NFL and GFAP as biomarkers for neuroaxonal damage and astrocytosis in CAA.

METHODS

For this cross-sectional study serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected between 2010 and 2020 from controls, (pre)symptomatic Dutch-type hereditary (D-CAA) mutation-carriers and participants with sporadic CAA (sCAA) from two prospective CAA studies at two University hospitals in the Netherlands. NFL and GFAP levels were measured with Simoa-assays. The association between NFL and GFAP levels and age, cognitive performance (MoCA), CAA-related MRI markers (CAA-CSVD-burden) and Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in CSF were assessed with linear regression adjusted for confounders. The control group was divided in age < 55 and ≥55 years to match the specific groups.

RESULTS

We included 187 participants: 28 presymptomatic D-CAA mutation-carriers (mean age 40 years), 29 symptomatic D-CAA participants (mean age 58 years), 59 sCAA participants (mean age 72 years), 33 controls < 55 years (mean age 42 years) and 38 controls ≥ 55 years (mean age 65 years). In presymptomatic D-CAA, only GFAP in CSF (7.7*103pg/mL vs. 4.4*103pg/mL in controls; P<.001) was increased compared to controls. In symptomatic D-CAA, both serum (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.008, GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 123.4pg/mL; P=0.027) and CSF (NFL:16.8*102pg/mL vs. 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.01 and GFAP:11.4*103pg/mL vs. 7.5*103pg/mL; P<.001) levels were higher than in controls and serum levels (NFL:26.2pg/mL vs. 6.7pg/mL; P=0.05 and GFAP:130.8pg/mL vs. 66.0pg/mL; P=0.004) were higher than in pre-symptomatic D-CAA. In sCAA, only NFL levels were increased compared to controls in both serum (25.6pg/mL vs. 12.5pg/mL; P=0.005) and CSF (20.0*102pg/mL vs 7.8*102pg/mL; P=0.008). All levels correlated with age. Serum NFL correlated with MoCA (P=0.008) and CAA-CSVD score (P<.001). NFL and GFAP in CSF correlated with Aβ42 levels (P=0.01/0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

GFAP level in CSF is an early biomarker for CAA and is increased years before symptom onset. NFL and GFAP levels in serum and CSF are biomarkers for advanced CAA.

Pediatric reference intervals for serum neurofilament light and glial fibrillary acidic protein using the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) cohort

OBJECTIVES

Blood biomarkers have the potential to transform diagnosis and prognosis for multiple neurological indications. Establishing normative data is a critical benchmark in the analytical validation process. Normative data are important in children as little is known about how brain development may impact potential biomarkers. The objective of this study is to generate pediatric reference intervals (RIs) for serum neurofilament light (NfL), an axonal marker, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an astrocytic marker.

METHODS

Serum from healthy children and adolescents aged 1 to <19 years were obtained from the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) cohort. Serum NfL (n=300) and GFAP (n=316) were quantified using Simoa technology, and discrete RI (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) and continuous RI (5th and 95th percentiles) were generated.

RESULTS

While there was no association with sex, there was a statistically significant (p<0.0001) negative association between age and serum NfL (Rho -0.400) and GFAP (Rho -0.749). Two statistically significant age partitions were generated for NfL: age 1 to <10 years (lower, upper limit; 3.13, 20.6 pg/mL) and 10 to <19 years (1.82, 7.44 pg/mL). For GFAP, three statistically significant age partitions were generated: age 1 to <3.5 years (80.4, 601 pg/mL); 3.5 to <11 years (50.7, 224 pg/mL); and 11 to <19 years (26.2, 119 pg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together with the literature on adults, NfL and GFAP display U-shaped curves with high levels in infants, decreasing levels during childhood, a plateau during adolescence and early adulthood and increasing levels in seniors. These normative data are expected to inform future pediatric studies on the importance of age on neurological blood biomarkers.

Cognitive decline in post-COVID-19 syndrome does not correspond with persisting neuronal or astrocytic damage

Cognitive impairment is the most frequent symptom reported in post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS). Aetiology of cognitive impairment in PCS is still to be determined. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are increased in acute COVID-19. Their role as biomarkers in other neurological disorders is under debate. We analysed serum levels of NfL and GFAP as markers for neuronal and astrocytic damage in 53 patients presenting to a PCS Neurology outpatient clinic. Only individuals with self-reported cognitive complaints were included. In these individuals, cognitive complaints were further assessed by comprehensive neuropsychological assessment (NPA). Patients were categorized into subgroups of subjective cognitive decline, single domain impairment, or multi-domain impairment. Serum NfL was in normal range, however an increase of serum GFAP was detected in 4% of patients. Serum NfL and GFAP levels correlated with each other, even when adjusting for patient age (r = 0.347, p = 0.012). NPA showed deficits in 70%; 40% showing impairment in several tested domains. No significant differences were found between serum NfL- and GFAP-levels comparing patients with subjective cognitive decline, single domain impairment, or multi-domain impairment. Persistent neuronal or astrocytic damage did not correlate with cognitive impairment in PCS.

Proteomic signatures of physical, cognitive, and imaging outcomes in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

A quantitative measurement of serum proteome biomarkers that would associate with disease progression endpoints can provide risk stratification for persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and supplement the clinical decision-making process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 202 PwMS were enrolled in a longitudinal study with measurements at two time points with an average follow-up time of 5.4 years. Clinical measures included the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25-foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg, and Symbol Digit Modalities Tests. Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging to determine the volumetric measures of the whole brain, gray matter, deep gray matter, and lateral ventricles. Serum samples were analyzed using a custom immunoassay panel on the Olink™ platform, and concentrations of 18 protein biomarkers were measured. Linear mixed-effects models and adjustment for multiple comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Subjects had a significant 55.6% increase in chemokine ligand 20 (9.7 pg/mL vs. 15.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and neurofilament light polypeptide (10.5 pg/mL vs. 11.5 pg/mL, p = 0.003) at the follow-up time point. Additional changes in CUB domain-containing protein 1, Contactin 2, Glial fibrillary acidic protein, Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, and Osteopontin were noted but did not survive multiple comparison correction. Worse clinical performance in the 9-HPT was associated with neurofilament light polypeptide (p = 0.001). Increases in several biomarker candidates were correlated with greater neurodegenerative changes as measured by different brain volumes.

CONCLUSION

Multiple proteins, selected from a disease activity test that represent diverse biological pathways, are associated with physical, cognitive, and radiographic outcomes. Future studies should determine the utility of multiple protein assays in routine clinical care.

Serial Measurements of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Potential Utility in Providing Insights into Secondary Insults and Long-Term Outcome

In patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), serum biomarkers may have utility in assessing the evolution of secondary brain injury. A panel of nine brain-injury- associated biomarkers was measured in archived serum samples over 10 days post-injury from 100 patients with moderate-severe TBI. Among the biomarkers evaluated, serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) had the strongest associations with summary measures of acute pathophysiology, including intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and brain tissue pO2 (PbtO2). Group based trajectory (TRAJ) analysis was used to identify three distinct GFAP subgroups. The low TRAJ group (n = 23) had peak levels of 9.4 + 1.2 ng/mL that declined rapidly. The middle TRAJ group (n = 48) had higher peak values (31.5 + 5.0 ng/mL) and a slower decline over time. The high TRAJ group (n = 26) had very high, sustained peak values (59.6 + 12.5 ng/mL) that even rose among some patients over 10 days. Patients in the high TRAJ group had significantly higher mortality rate than patients in low and middle TRAJ groups (26.9% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.028). The frequency of poor neurological outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score Extended [GOS-E] 1-4) was 88.5% in the high TRAJ group, 54.2% in the middle TRAJ group, and 30.4% in the low TRAJ group (p < 0.001). ICP was highest in the high TRAJ group (median 17.6 mm Hg), compared with 14.4 mmHg in the low and 15.9 mm Hg in middle TRAJ groups (p = 0.002). High TRAJ patients spent the longest time with ICP >25 mm Hg, median 23 h, compared with 2 and 6 h in the low and middle TRAJ groups (p = 0.006), and the longest time with ICP >30 mm Hg, median 5 h, compared with 0 and 1 h in the low and middle TRAJ groups, respectively (p = 0.013). High TRAJ group patients more commonly required tier 2 or 3 treatment to control ICP. The high TRAJ group had the longest duration when CPP was <50 mm Hg (p = 0.007), and PbtO2 was <10 mm Hg (p = 0.002). Logistical regression was used to study the relationship between temporal serum GFAP patterns and 6-month GOS-E. Here, the low and middle TRAJ groups were combined to form a low-risk group, and the high TRAJ group was designated the high-risk group. High TRAJ group patients had a greater chance of a poor 6-month GOS-E (p < 0.0001). When adjusting for baseline injury characteristics, GFAP TRAJ group membership remained associated with GOS-E (p = 0.003). When an intensive care unit (ICU) injury burden score, developed to quantify physiological derangements, was added to the model, GFAP TRAJ group membership remained associated with GOS-E (p = 0.014). Mediation analysis suggested that ICU burden scores were in the causal pathway between TRAJ group and 6-month mortality or GOS-E. Our results suggest that GFAP may be useful to monitor serially in moderate-severe TBI patients. Future studies in larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Neurofilament Light Chain and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as early prognostic biomarkers after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIMS

Neurofilament Light Chain (NfL) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) are proteins released into the bloodstream upon hypoxic brain injury. We evaluated the biokinetics and examined the prognostic performance of serum NfL and GFAP in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Furthermore, we compared the prognostic performance to that of serum Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE).

METHODS

This is a sub-study of the "Targeted temperature management for 48 vs 24 hours" (NCT01689077) trial. NfL and GFAP serum values from 82 patients were examined in blood samples collected at 24, 48 and 72 hours (h) after reaching target temperature of 33 ± 1 °C. This temperature was reached within a median of 281-320 minutes after intensive care unit admission. GFAP was analysed at 48 and 72 h. The neuroprognostic performance of NfL and GFAP was evaluated after 6 months follow-up.

RESULTS

NfL and GFAP values were significantly higher in patients with a poor outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score 3-5) vs. good outcome (CPC 1-2). NfL 24 h: 1371.5 (462.0; 2125.1) vs. 24.8 (14.0; 61.6). GFAP 48 h: 1285.3 (843.9; 2236.7) vs. 361.2 (200.4; 665.6) (both p < 0.001). Both biomarkers were promising markers of poor functional outcome at 24 and 48 h respectively: NfL 24 h: AUROC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00). GFAP 48 h: AUROC 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.96). NfL and GFAP both predicted outcome better than NSE at 48 h (both p < 0.01). At 72 h NfL but not GFAP outperformed NSE (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Serum NfL and GFAP may be strong biomarkers of poor functional outcome after OHCA from an early timepoint.

Age specific reference intervals for plasma biomarkers of neurodegeneration and neurotrauma in a Canadian population

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aimed to create reference intervals (RI) using a large Canadian population-based cohort, for plasma protein biomarkers with potential utility to screen, diagnosis, prognosticate and manage a variety of neurological diseases and disorders. RIs were generated for: the ratio of amyloid beta 42 over 40 (Aβ42/40), phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau-181), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).

METHODS

900 plasma specimens from male and female participants aged 3-79 years old were obtained from the Statistics Canada Biobank, which holds specimens from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Analysis of Aβ42/40, p-tau-181, NfL and GFAP was performed on the Quanterix Simoa HD-X analyzer using the Neurology 4-plex E and p-tau-181 assays. Discrete RIs were produced according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (EP28-A3c). Continuous RIs were created using quantile regression.

RESULTS

For discrete RIs, significant age partitions were determined for each biomarker. No significant sex partitions were found. The following ranges and age partitions were determined: Aβ42/40: 3-<55y = 0.053-0.098, 55-<80y = 0.040-0.090; p-tau-181: 3-<12y = 1.4-5.6 pg/ml, 12-<60y = 0.8-3.1 pg/ml, 60-<80y = 0.9-4.0 pg/ml; NfL: 3-<40y = 2.6-11.3 pg/ml, 40-<60y = 4.6-17.7 pg/ml, 60-<80y = 8.1-47.1 pg/ml; GFAP; 3-<10y = 47.0-226 pg/ml, 10-<60y = 21.2-91.9 pg/ml, 60-<80y = 40.7-228 pg/ml. Continuous RIs produced smooth centile curves across the age range, from which point estimates for each year of age were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrete and continuous RIs for neurological plasma biomarkers will help refine normative cut-offs across the lifespan and improve the precision of interpretating biomarker levels. Continuous RIs are recommended for use in age groups, such as pediatrics and older adults, that experience rapid concentration changes by age.

Serum GFAP - pediatric reference interval in a cohort of Danish children

OBJECTIVES

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in blood is an emerging biomarker of brain injury and neurological disease. Its clinical use in children is limited by the lack of a reference interval (RI). Thus, the aim of the present study was to establish an age-dependent continuous RI for serum GFAP in children.

METHODS

Excess serum from routine allergy testing of 391 children, 0.4-17.9 years of age, was measured by a single-molecule array (Simoa) assay. A continuous RI was modelled using non-parametric quantile regression and presented both graphically and tabulated as discrete one-year RIs based on point estimates from the model.

RESULTS

Serum GFAP showed a strong age-dependency with declining levels and variability from infants to adolescents. The estimated median level decreased 66 % from four months to five years of age and another 65 % from five years to 17.9 years of age. No gender difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The study establishes an age-dependent RI for serum GFAP in children showing high levels and variability in the first years of life.

Neurofilament light chain: serum reference intervals in Danish children aged 0-17 years

Elevated levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in the blood is an unspecific biomarker for damage to neuronal axons. The measurement of NfL levels in the blood can provide useful information for monitoring and prognostication of various neurological disorders in children, but a reference interval (RI) is needed before the clinical implementation of the biomarker. We aimed to establish a RI for children aged 0-17 years. Serum samples from 292 healthy reference subjects aged 0.4-17.9 years were analysed by a single-molecule array (Simoa®) established for routine clinical use. Non-parametric quantile regression was used to model a continuous RI, and a traditional age-partitioned non-parametric RI was established according to Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guideline C28-A3. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of hemolysis on assay performance. The traditional age-partitioned non-parametric RI for the age group <3 years was 3.5-16.6 ng/L and 2.1-13.9 ng/L in the age group ≥3 years, respectively. The continuous RI showed an age-dependent decrease in median NfL levels in the first three years of life which was also evident in the age-partitioning of the traditional RI. We found no difference between sexes and no impact of hemolysis on the NfL test results. This study establishes a pediatric RI for serum NfL and lays the groundwork for its future use in clinical practice.

Neurofilament light chain on intensive care admission is an independent predictor of mortality in COVID-19: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and total-tau protein (tau) are novel blood biomarkers of neurological injury, and may be used to predict outcomes in critical COVID-19.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre cohort study of 117 consecutive and critically ill COVID-19 patients in six intensive care units (ICUs) in southern Sweden between May and November 2020. Serial NfL, GFAP and tau were analysed in relation to mortality, the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) and the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) components of health-related quality of life at one year.

RESULTS

NfL, GFAP and tau on ICU admission predicted one-year mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74[Formula: see text]0.90), 0.72 (95% CI 0.62[Formula: see text]0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.54[Formula: see text]0.77). NfL on admission was an independent predictor of one-year mortality (p = 0.039). Low NfL and GFAP values were associated with good PCS ([Formula: see text]45) at one year but not with good MCS ([Formula: see text]45) or GOSE ([Formula: see text]5).

CONCLUSIONS

NfL on ICU admission was an independent predictor of mortality. High levels of NfL, GFAP and tau were associated with mortality but not with poor GOSE in survivors at one year. Low levels of NfL and GFAP were associated with improved physical health-related quality of life.

Quantification and prospective evaluation of serum NfL and GFAP as blood-derived biomarkers of outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients

Identification of reliable and accessible biomarkers to characterize ischemic stroke patients' prognosis remains a clinical challenge. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are markers of brain injury, detectable in blood by high-sensitive technologies. Our aim was to measure serum NfL and GFAP after stroke, and to evaluate their correlation with functional outcome and the scores in rehabilitation scales at 3-month follow-up. Stroke patients were prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal observational study within 24 hours from symptom onset (D1) and monitored after 7 (D7), 30 ± 3 (M1) and 90 ± 5 (M3) days. At each time-point serum NfL and GFAP levels were measured by Single Molecule Array and correlated with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin scale (mRS), Trunk Control Test (TCT), Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Serum NfL and GFAP showed different temporal profiles: NfL increased after stroke with a peak value at D7; GFAP showed an earlier peak at D1. NfL and GFAP concentrations correlated with clinical/rehabilitation outcomes both longitudinally and prospectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that NfL-D7 and GFAP-D1 were independent predictors of 3-month NIHSS, TCT, FAC and FIM scores, with NfL being the biomarker with the best predictive performance.