Importance of validation of immunoassays for intact proinsulin

The switch from sulfonylurea to preprandial short- acting insulin analog substitution has an immediate and comprehensive beta-cell protective effect in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Supplementary insulin therapy provides assistance to meal-time insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and may have protective effects on beta-cell function.

METHODS

This study explored the immediate effect of supplementary insulin therapy on beta- cell function in patients with glimepiride monotherapy (five women, 15 men; 61.8 +/- 6.4 years old; body mass index, 31.1 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2); hemoglobin A1c, 7.0 +/- 1.3%). After 1 week of continued glimiperide therapy, the patients were randomized either to continue with their oral treatment or to switch to a fixed-dose supplementary insulin therapy (8 U of insulin aspart subcutaneously before each meal) for another week. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) after drug uptake were performed at days 7 and 14, with measurement of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, intact and total proinsulin, glucagon, lactate, free fatty acids, and adiponectin.

RESULTS

Significant reductions from baseline were seen in the supplementary insulin therapy group for the fasting values of insulin (from 13.1 +/- 5.1 microU/mL to 10.6 +/- 5.2 microU/mL, P < 0.01), intact proinsulin (from 18.3 +/- 11.2 pmol/L to 10.3 +/- 4.6 pmol/L, P micro 0.05), total proinsulin (from 43.3 +/- 22.7 pmol/L to 29.7 +/- 14.5 pmol/L, P < 0.01), split proinsulin (from 24.9 +/- 13.8 pmol/L to 19.4 +/- 10.8 pmol/L, P micro 0.01), and the degree of beta-cell dysfunction (P < 0.05). Also, lower values for intact and total proinsulin and split proinsulin in the OGTT were observed in this group during the OGTT at the end point, while no changes at all occurred in the glimepiride group.

CONCLUSIONS

A fixed low-dose preprandial insulin aspart therapy resulted in an overall beta-cell protection with an improved fasting beta-cell secretion profile already within 1 week. Our study indicates that supplementary insulin therapy might be a reasonable alternative to bedtime basal insulin injections for initiation of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

IRIS II Study: Sensitivity and specificity of intact proinsulin, adiponectin, and the proinsulin/adiponectin ratio as markers for insulin resistance

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to compare the specificity and sensitivity of intact proinsulin, adiponectin, and their ratio (proinsulin/adiponectin) in the prediction of insulin resistance as assessed by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score (> or =2 = resistant).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using a cross-sectional approach, 500 orally treated patients with type 2 diabetes (272 women, 238 men; mean +/- SD age, 64.8 +/- 11.6 years; hemoglobin A1c, 7.0 +/- 1.5%; disease duration, 5.8 +/- 6.1 years) were investigated. Various cutoffs for body mass index-adjusted adiponectin and proinsulin/adiponectin were compared with the established cutoff value of 10 pmol/L for fasting proinsulin.

RESULTS

Fasting proinsulin correlated more closely with the HOMA score (r = 0.560, P < 0.001) than fasting adiponectin (r = -0.204, P < 0.001) or proinsulin/adiponectin (r = 0.355, P < 0.001). For proinsulin, specificity and sensitivity for insulin resistance in correlation to the HOMA score results were 96% and 70%, respectively. At a comparable specificity level to proinsulin, adiponectin did not reach a comparable sensitivity (14%), while the proinsulin/adiponectin ratio almost reached the same sensitivity (65%). Overall, patients with elevated proinsulin had a higher prevalence of micro- and macrovascular disease [odds ratio 1.47 (adiponectin, 1.08; proinsulin/ adiponectin, 1.48) and 1.34 (adiponectin, 1.32; proinsulin/adiponectin, 1.27), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Elevation of fasting intact proinsulin seems to be the more specific marker for insulin resistance and increased cardiovascular risk than suppression of fasting adiponectin. Formation of the ratio does not lead to a further increase in the predictive value.

Role of intact proinsulin in diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. While this can be partly explained by an impairment of direct insulin action on the endothelial cell, an independent contribution can be assigned also to the secretory dysfunction of the beta-cell. If the demand for insulin triggered by insulin resistance is arriving at a certain threshold, an insufficiency of the cleavage capacity of beta-cell carboxypeptidase H leads to an increased secretion of intact proinsulin in addition to the desired insulin molecule. Proinsulin, however, has been demonstrated to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor by stimulating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 secretion and blocking fibrinolysis. A recently introduced intact proinsulin assay is able to distinguish between intact proinsulin and its specific and non-specific cleavage products. This assay allows for a pathophysiological staging of type 2 diabetes based on beta-cell secretion. It could be confirmed by a large epidemiological study (IRIS-2, 4,265 patients) that intact proinsulin is a highly specific marker for insulin resistance. It could also be shown in other studies that successful resistance treatment with insulin or glitazones led to a decrease in elevated proinsulin levels and, thus, to a decrease of cardiovascular risk, while the levels remained high during sulfonylurea therapy. Therefore, patients with increased fasting intact proinsulin values should be treated with a therapy focusing on insulin resistance. Assessment of beta-cell function by determination of intact proinsulin may facilitate the selection of the most promising therapy and may also serve to monitor treatment success in the further course of the disease.

Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation of Specific Chemiluminescence Assays for Intact and Total Proinsulin

Measurement of proinsulin is an important tool in the assessment of pancreatic beta cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study was to perform a technical and clinical evaluation of two specific chemiluminescence assays (CLIA) for the determination of intact and total proinsulin in comparison to a radioimmunoassay (RIA) method for the measurement of total proinsulin. A total of 191 serum samples from patients with type 2 diabetes were used to perform a regression analysis. The total proinsulin CLIA showed higher proinsulin levels than the two other proinsulin assays (mean +/- SD: 55.9 +/- 58.1 pmol/l, p < 0.001 in both cases). The intact proinsulin CLIA (22.5 +/- 20.9 pmol/l) gave lower values than the RIA for total proinsulin (31.9 +/- 25.4 pmol/l, p < 0.001 vs. CLIA, r = 0.948). The RIA has a 95% cross-reactivity to des31,32-proinsulin, which is secreted during the process of beta cell deterioration. The intact proinsulin CLIA has virtually no cross-reactivity with des31,32-proinsulin (1.4%) and is therefore more specific for intact proinsulin than the RIA. This test does not measure further degradation products, in contrast to the total proinsulin CLIA. The CLIA is, therefore, more specific for total proinsulin measurement than the RIA. Both CLIAs could be performed much faster (4 hours) than the RIA method (75 hours/ 4 days). In conclusion, the CLIA methods show improved qualitative outcomes, higher specificity and several technical advantages over the RIA method.